• No results found

ANNUAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FORM SECONDARY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "ANNUAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FORM SECONDARY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER"

Copied!
9
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

A

NNUAL

P

ERFORMANCE

E

VALUATION

F

ORM

S

ECONDARY

C

HIEF

E

XECUTIVE

O

FFICER

Name of Incumbent: Evaluation Period: Date:

SECTION DESCRIPTION

Section 1:

Annual Goals The organization’s annual goals, as approved by the Board of Directors at the end of the preceding fiscal year, as well as other

goals identified by the Board or the CEO Performance Evaluation Committee, are entered in this section. (These goals form the basis of the CEO Performance Management Plan.) The CEO Performance Evaluation Committee reviews these goals at each quarterly review to ensure that they remain current with the changing environment. During the mid-year review, the CEO meets with the CEO Performance Evaluation Committee to discuss progress. At year-end, the CEO Performance Evaluation Committee evaluates the CEO’s performance ratings for each goal.

Section 2: Assessment

of Capabilities The CEO Performance Evaluation Committee evaluates the performance of the CEO based on the 360-degree capability assessment, as well as other relevant feedback. The CEO Performance Evaluation Committee and the CEO identify areas for

development and agree on a development plan. At the mid-year and year-end reviews, the CEO and the CEO Performance Evaluation Committee meet to discuss progress.

Section 3:

Performance Summary and Sign-Off

This section is used to summarize the CEO’s overall performance against expectations for the fiscal year. The CEO and the Board Chair sign off on the year-end performance review.

(2)

O

VERVIEW OF THE

R

ATING

S

CALE

Use the following rating scale to rate the CEO’s performance relative to expectations at year-end for Section 2: Assessment of Capabilities.

RATING SCALE DESCRIPTION

Exceeds Expectations Performance/outcomes considerably surpass performance expectations on all key measures.

Meets Expectations Performance/outcomes consistently meet established expectations, and may exceed expectations in some aspects of

performance. Partially Meets

Expectations

Performance/outcomes meet some, but not all, expectations. Performance is not at the fully acceptable level to achieve desired results, and may require further improvement or development.

Does Not Meet Expectations

Performance/outcomes consistently do not meet expectations. Performance is at a level below what is necessary to achieve the desired results. Serious improvement is needed and a corrective action plan will be discussed.

(3)

1. A

NNUAL

G

OALS

Prior to the end of the previous fiscal year, the Board of Directors approves the organization’s goals in alignment with the annual strategic plan. Additional goals may be identified by the Board and the CEO Performance Evaluation Committee. The mid-year performance review includes a review of progress toward achieving these goals. The goals and related indicators are reviewed by the CEO Performance Evaluation Committee at each quarterly review to ensure that they remain current with the changing environment.

(4)

2.

A

SSESSMENT OF

C

APABILITIES

The CEO Performance Evaluation Committee evaluates the performance of the CEO based on the 360-degree capability assessment, as well as other relevant feedback. The CEO Performance Evaluation Committee and the CEO identify areas for development and agree on a

development plan. At the mid-year and year-end reviews, the CEO and the CEO Performance Evaluation Committee meet to discuss progress.

Capability Comments Year-End Review

Exceeds Expectations Meets Expectations Part ia ll y M e e ts

Expectations Does Not

Meet Expectations Un ab le to evaluate

DOMAIN: LEADS SELF

DOMAIN: ENGAGES OTHERS

(5)

Capability Comments Year-End Review Exceeds Expectations Meets Expectations Part ia ll y M e e ts

Expectations Does Not

Meet Expectations Un ab le to evaluate  

DOMAIN: DEVELOPS COALITIONS

(6)

Capability Comments Year-End Review Exceeds Expectations Meets Expectations Part ia ll y M e e ts

Expectations Does Not

Meet Expectations Un ab le to evaluate

DOMAIN: SYSTEMS TRANSFORMATION

(7)

2.

A

SSESSMENT OF

C

APABILITIES

,

CONTINUED

Part 2 (a) - Review of Prior Year Development Plan

Review outcomes from prior year development plan.

Areas for Focus/

(8)

Part 2 (b) - Future Year Development Plan

Identify areas of focus for development, including actions and a timeframe for completion. Refer to the results of the 360-degree capability assessment and other information sources to identify areas for development.

Areas for Focus/

(9)

3. P

ERFORMANCE

S

UMMARY AND

S

IGN

-O

FF

Complete the following at the end of the performance cycle. Overall Rating:

Annual Goals: Insert pay-out of performance management plan.

Capabilities: Number of capabilities at or above target level:

Overall Rating

Exceeds Expectations

Meets Expectations

Partially Meets Expectations

Does Not Meet Expectations

CEO Comments:

Board Chair Comments:

CEO Signature: Date:

References

Related documents

The aim of this paper is to present current knowledge on the composition of crustaceans and aquatic insects of different water body types in a group of Mediterranean coastal

educators to pay and submit documents required for a certificate; 2) a reduction in the processing time for educator certificates; 3) a reduction in the number of emergency,

SYSTEMS LINKAGE DIAGRAM LINKING SYSTEMS 6.7.1 6.7.2 6.7.3 6.7.4 JOB ANALYSIS Job Analysis Job Descriptions KPA`s Job evaluation TRAINING Training + Development

z z Incorrectly assembled bearing Verify correct bearing assemblage and adjustments z z z Excessive amount of oil Clean bearing and add correct amount of lubricant z z z Oil

Most of well-known stock market indices of the major stock markets in developed countries are still considered as highly representative since their constituent

In the case of free standing deposits, a reduction in interconnected porosity resulted in a lower corrosion current density, a lower passive current density and an increase in

In the holistic approach, while Shari’ah may be a principal source of law, the human attempts to understand it and articulate it as positive laws must be grounded in universal

where 'a' is also a positive real different than unity and is called the base and 'x' is called the exponent.. logarithm of a number to the same base