• No results found

Reading Corps. Program Overview

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Reading Corps. Program Overview"

Copied!
21
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Reading Corps

(2)

3

rd

Grade Reading Proficiency:

A Critical Milestone to College and Career

 Almost three-quarters (74%) of children who read poorly in third grade

continue to read poorly in high school, making third grade reading proficiency a key predictor of high school drop-out rates.

(3)

Intervene Early to Accelerate Progress

(4)

Expansive

Reach

across

Minnesota

Nearly 200 PreK sites

-63% in Public School -25% in Head Start -10% in Community Child Care -2% in Charter School

(5)

Who are the players that ensure

student success

Master

Coach

Program

Staff

Internal

Coach

Reading

Corps

Tutor

Students

Employee of Program site 6-9 hrs per member per month Serving as an AmeriCorps member

Part-time Santa Cruz Reading Corps tutor

serves 900 hours in 9 months (September-May)

(6)

Intentional Support to 3-5 year olds in Pre-K/TK

settings

• Tutor placed in a PreK/TK classroom to support students language, literacy, social and emotional development throughout the day.

• In the process of adding math interactions! • Literacy support provided during:

• Whole classroom (Tier 1) • Small group time (Tier 2) • One-on-one tutoring (Tier 3)

(7)

7

• Tutors are trained to use the SEEDS of Early Literacy strategies • Internal Coach conducts a pre/post ELLCO in each classroom • Family Engagement is valued: Raising a Reader/Bring a Book

• Tutor works with classroom team to enhance literacy environment • Tutor completes literacy assessment with all children to identify those

needing an extra boost

• using valid and reliable assessments to screen and monitor: IGDI’s and FAST

• One-on-One tutoring and follow-up assessment provided for those identified

Intentional Support to 3-5 year olds in

Pre-K settings

(8)

RC model provides support

• SEEDS TOT for identified literacy expert.

• Tutor receives AmeriCorps orientation and trainings with on-going support throughout the year

• Tutor receives rigorous SEEDS training in the Fall and on-going Response to Intervention trainings throughout the year (4 full days for coach and tutors.

• Tutor receives twice-monthly coaching from Internal Coach • Internal Coach is observed and coached once a month by

Master Literacy Coach (1/mo internal coach meetings) • Data review meeting with District leadership 3x/yr

• Program staff provides monthly member meet-ups for tutors and 2 site evals/year

(9)

SEEDS Quality Interactions

SEEDS Inc. revised 2008

SEEDS Quality Interactions are balanced and provide

opportunities to build a strong foundation (Self-Image) on which learning and growth blossom.

Sensitive Encourage Educate Self-Image Develop through Doing Vocabulary and Meaning Alphabetic Knowledge Book and Print Rules Phonological Awareness Conversation and Oral Language

(10)

Family Engagement:

Raising A Reader

A Raising a Reader Book

Bag with 4 quality,

developmentally

appropriate books is

sent home each week

for families to read

together with their

children

(11)
(12)

Effects of Training and Coaching on

Teachers’ Implementation

Joyce and Showers, 2002

Training Components Demonstrate Knowledge Demonstrate Skills in a Training Setting

Use New Skills in the Classroom

Theory & Discussion 10% 5% 0% … +

Demonstration in Training 30% 20% 0% … +

Practice & Feedback in Training 60% 60% 5% … +

(13)

Fidelity in Conducting Assessments

PreK

Rhyming Alliteration Picture

Naming Naming Letter Sounds Letter

N = 511 489 528 499 484 Median % Fidelity 95% 94% 94% 97% 97% Mean % Fidelity 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Standard Deviation .11 .15 .08 .06 .06

(14)

Fidelity in Delivering Interventions

PreK

(15)

Matched Sample Analysis

Dr. Dave Heistad, 2008-09 Mid-Year Evaluation

 The Dependent t-test comparing mean total literacy scores on the Minneapolis Public Schools Beginning

Kindergarten Assessment (BKA) for students in Reading Corps relative to students not in Reading Corps was statistically significant t (65)= 2.96; p=.004. The effect size (in standard deviation units) for Reading Corps vs. non-Reading Corps was .53 which is a moderate effect. In conclusion, the difference between Reading Corps students and non-Reading Corps students was a large difference which was statistically significant at a 99.5% confidence level.

(16)
(17)

17

Santa Cruz Reading Corps in 15 sites:

Live Oak School District – 5 tutors/9 classrooms

Pajaro Valley USD – 7 tutors/14 classrooms

~ 500 children

LOSD

(18)

66.5% 49.3% 79.3% 56.6% 79.0% 57.2% 84.5% 57.9% 88.4% 64.5% 25.2% 33.4% 12.0% 11.1% 15.7% 24.7% 8.5% 25.4% 7.5% 18.3% 8.4% 17.3% 8.6% 32.3% 5.3% 18.1% 6.9% 16.7% 4.1% 17.2% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Fall

(N=334) (N=359)Winter (N=324)Fall (N=359)Winter (N=319)Fall (N=353)Winter (N=317)Fall (N=347)Winter (N=320)Fall (N=344)Winter

Santa Cruz Reading Corps

Percent of Pre-K Students by Performance Level

(Ages 4 & 5)

Picture Naming Letter Naming

Rhyming Alliteratio n

Letter Sounds

(19)

Partnership with

Minnesota Reading Corps

• Logo, marketing

• EDSpring web-based data entry tool • Recruitment tool

• Evaluation – multi-year studies…. • Program support

• Coaching Support for Master Literacy Coach • Training/Materials

(20)

Evaluation of Minnesota Reading Corps

Multi-year Study:

Funded by the Corporation for National and

Community Service (CNCS)

Conducted by the National Opinion Research Center

(NORC) at the University of Chicago

Three-year Study:

o Process assessment o Impact Evaluation

─ K-3

(21)

Question & Answer

Does it work with any curriculum?

Yes curriculum neutral

What it a site is using CLASS/DRDP?

Other?

References

Related documents