• No results found

Better Access to Medicare Mental Health Items and Psychology Providers

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Better Access to Medicare Mental Health Items and Psychology Providers"

Copied!
9
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

1

Medicare mental health items and psychology providers. Australian Psychological Society

‘Better Access’ to

Medicare Mental Health

Items and Psychology Providers

The issue of ease of access by the community to the new mental health items is central to its success. This paper attempts to examine aspects crucial to access: location of services and costs to clients. In response to questions regarding the new COAG Mental Health initiative and its uptake by the community, the Australian Psychological Society (APS) sought the input of its members who are delivering the new Medicare Benefit Schedule items. The APS received responses from 623 Clinical Psychologists to a range of questions. Additionally, two separate groups of Registered Psychologists (not Clinical Psychologists) were surveyed through email-based questions and an on-line survey, respectively, gaining 812 responses. These responses from the samples of Clinical Psychologists and Registered Psychologists are presented and explained below.

Table 1, below, presents data on demographics of psychology providers for locations across Australia.

Table 1: Geographical distribution of psychology providers

Clinical Psychologist Registered Psychologist Totals

n % n % n %

Metropolitan 475 76 591 73 1066 74

Regional 120 19 144 18 264 19

Rural 28 5 77 9 105 7

(2)

2

Medicare mental health items and psychology providers. Australian Psychological Society

The results show that a quarter of Clinical Psychologists (24%) and Registered Psychologists (27%) offer psychological services outside metropolitan areas. The majority of psychologists (74%) provide services within metropolitan areas, followed by regional (19%) and rural (7%).

Table 2 displays bulk billing patterns of Clinical and Registered Psychologists for locations across Australia: metropolitan, regional, and rural areas.

Table 2: Bulk billing pattern for psychology providers across

metropolitan,

regional, and rural areas

62% of Clinical Psychologists report bulk billing clients with the highest proportion (71%) of bulk billing services provided in rural areas. In contrast, 48% of Registered Psychologists bulk bill. The highest proportion of bulk billing services provided by Registered Psychologists (60%) is for regional areas.

Table 3, shows average and average highest Medicare fees charged by psychology providers for locations across Australia.

Clinical Psychologist Registered Psychologist

n Bulk bill % n Bulk bill %

Metropolitan 281 59 259 44

Regional 81 69 85 60

Rural 20 71 43 56

(3)

3

Medicare mental health items and psychology providers. Australian Psychological Society

Table 3: Psychology providers’ fees charged across metropolitan,

regional, and rural areas

Clinical Psychologists’ charge an average Medicare fee of $133 — $4 above the Schedule Fee. The highest fee charged by Clinical Psychologists, on average, is $143 — an additional $13.60 on top of the recommended Schedule Fee of $129.40. The Registered Psychologists report an average Medicare fee ($101) and an average highest Medicare fee ($113) that was, typically, only $13 to $25 more than the Schedule Fee of $88.20, respectively.

Further, Registered Psychologists’ fees were examined according to metropolitan, regional and rural classification. On average, psychologists charge $101 for services in metropolitan areas, $99 in regional, and $103 in rural areas. Average highest fees charged to Medicare clients were found to be $114 for metropolitan areas, $108 for regional areas, and $118 for services provided in rural and remote areas. The highest fees charged, therefore, are on average only $26 to $30 more than the Medicare Schedule Fee of $88.20 for Registered Psychologists.

Alternative representations of the data on fee structures for Clinical and Registered Psychologists are represented in Figures 1 to 4.

Clinical Psychologist Registered Psychologist

Average Medicare fee Highest average Medicare fee Average Medicare fee Highest average Medicare fee Metropolitan $133 $143 $101 $114 Regional $99 $108

Rural (over all areas) $103 $117

(4)

4

Medicare mental health items and psychology providers. Australian Psychological Society

Figure 1: Analysis of Clinical Psychologists’ average Medicare fees

charged.

As demonstrated above in figure 1, the data indicates that the average fee charge by the majority of Clinical Psychologists (57%) is at, or below, the Schedule Fee of $130.

Figure 2: Analysis of Clinical Psychologists’ highest Medicare fees

charged.

Similar to the data on average fee, almost half of all Clinical Psychologists (42%) highest fee charged is at, or below, the Schedule Fee of $130. Three quarters of

(5)

5

Medicare mental health items and psychology providers. Australian Psychological Society

Clinical Psychologists (77%) highest fee charge is $150 or less, and only 13% are charging $160 or more for psychological services to their Medicare clients.

Figure 3: Analysis of Registered Psychologists’ average Medicare fees

charged.

The data for Registered Psychologists shows that the majority of psychologists (59%) average fee is less than $100. More specifically, almost a quarter of psychologists (24%) charge at or below the Schedule Fee of $88.20. Only 13% of Registered Psychologists charge more than $120 for a 50-minute-plus psychological service for Medicare clients.

(6)

6

Medicare mental health items and psychology providers. Australian Psychological Society

Figure 4: Analysis of Registered Psychologists’ highest Medicare fees

charged.

The Registered Psychologists (67%) report their highest Medicare fee to be less than $120. In fact, half of the Registered Psychologists report their average highest Medicare fee at $110 or lower, and further, 38% of psychologists’ average highest fee is below $100. This should be compared to the Schedule Fee of $88.20 for Registered Psychologists.

Table 4 and Table 5 present data on psychologists’ perceptions of General Practitioner management of Mental Health Care Plans.

Table 4: Proportion of General Practitioners who do not lodge the

correct Medicare consultation item 2710

Less than 10% 11-25% 26-50% 51-75% 76-100% TOTAL n n n n n Clinical 266 56 0 0 17 339 Registered 376 76 68 14 35 569 Total % 71% 15% 7% 1% 6% 908 Total n 642 132 68 14 52

(7)

7

Medicare mental health items and psychology providers. Australian Psychological Society

In response to a question regarding what proportion of General Practitioners do not lodge the correct Medicare consultation item 2710 the statistics suggest, that generally, psychologists did not perceive this as a problem. The relevance of this issue surrounds the fact that without this “lodgment” the claims of psychologists, or those of their patients, could not be paid. With a total of 908 responses, 71% of Clinical and Registered Psychologists report that General Practitioners lodge the correct form in the majority of cases. Anecdotally, psychologists report a great improvement amongst General Practitioners in activating the rebates for clients.

Table 5: Proportion of General Practitioners who send the MHCP with

the referral

Only a slight majority of General Practitioners (56%) were reported to send the Mental Health Care Plan (MHCP) together with the referral to psychologists on more than seventy five per cent of occasions.

The data on Clinical and Registered Psychologists seeing new clients or having pre-existing clients referred under the Medicare Initiative are displayed in Table 6 and 7, respectively. Less than 10% 11-25% 26-50% 51-75% 76-100% TOTAL N n n n n n Clinical 25 23 62 60 199 369 Registered 37 34 138 104 429 742 Total % 6% 5% 18% 15% 56% 1111 Total n 62 57 200 164 628

(8)

8

Medicare mental health items and psychology providers. Australian Psychological Society

Table 6: Percentage of new clients Clinical and Registered Psychologists

are seeing under Medicare

The findings detailed in Table 4 suggest that up to 60% of psychological clients are new clients under the Medicare Initiative. 66% of Clinical Psychologists report that at least 75% of their Medicare clients are new clients, and 57% of Registered Psychologists report that at least 75% of their Medicare clients are new clients.

Table 7: The frequency of psychologists seeing pre-existing clients

under Medicare

The majority of Clinical and Registered Psychologists (67%) are not seeing pre-existing clients under the new Medicare Initiative. Simply put, 43% of psychologists report that less than ten percent of their clients are pre-existing clients.

Less than 10% 11-25% 26-50% 51-75% 76-100% TOTAL N n n n n n Specialist 12 16 47 54 250 379 Registered 37 40 106 134 423 740 TOTAL % 4% 5% 14% 17% 60% 1119 TOTAL n 49 56 153 188 673 Less than 10% 11-25% 26-50% 51-75% 76-100% TOTAL N n n n n n Specialist 193 87 57 13 14 364 Registered 245 152 146 37 65 645 TOTAL % 43% 24% 20% 5% 8% 1009 TOTAL n 438 239 203 50 79

(9)

9

Medicare mental health items and psychology providers. Australian Psychological Society

Conclusion

This survey attempted to address the issue of access in the community to the new MBS items. The responses received from Psychologists who are providing these services were extremely encouraging. The two aspects of access that were addressed — location and cost of services — evoked very clear messages. Psychologists, both Clinical and Registered, are servicing the regional and rural areas, providing bulk billing, and keeping out of pocket expenses to a minimum.

References

Related documents

1) Questionnaires were distributed nationally to clinical staff and implementation leads. 2) A national comparison of the number and severity of pre and post

The management of island breaching in national parks and in federal wilderness areas on coastal barrier islands, similar to the management of fire, mosquitoes, and other

Although a few studies have examined the direct relationship between performance-based rewards, training and development, and employee turnover intention in a single

The record of Bomber Command operations in October 1944 shows that Harris carried out the oil and transportation directives and then complied with the new plan for

Prigoff, Esq., appeals his rejection as Police Officer candidate by the City of Paterson and its request to remove his name from the eligible list for Police Officer

when a Company settles a class action lawsuit and estab- lishes a claims-made process, it has two choices: (1) take a charge on its financial statements for the entire amount of

Therefore, an eavesdropper can never isolate an individual user’s signal because there is always an active virtual user in the network that serves as interferer, and

This paper presents a study of tree species diversity of deciduous dipterocarp forest (DDF) in Mae Chaem District, Chiang Mai Province, northern Thailand and a review of