• No results found

The SharePoint Maturity Model

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "The SharePoint Maturity Model"

Copied!
50
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

The SharePoint Maturity Model

Presented as a Live Broadcast

for

Nothing But SharePoint

1 March 2011

(2)

Agenda

• Logistics

• What’s in it for me?

• About Me

• About My Company

• About the SharePoint Maturity Model

• About Microsoft’s SP Competencies

• SMM Competency Definitions

• SMM Maturity Level Definitions

• The SharePoint Maturity Model - overview

• Self Evaluation Matrix

• The SharePoint Maturity Model – detail & case studies

• Credits & Resources

(3)

Logistics

• If you’re tweeting or live blogging, please

include #EUSP and @sadalit

(4)

What’s In It For Me?

• The Maturity Model can help you develop your strategic

roadmap, and ultimately lead to:

– Greater business process efficiency

– A more trustworthy SP environment

– Happier, more empowered users

– More time for YOU

• to innovate, rather than putting out fires or answering the same

question over and over.

• You can get a quantitative sense of your progress by

re-evaluating each year.

• You are helping to build a data model that will help answer

larger questions about where organizations are in their SP

maturity by industry, number of years of use, etc.

(5)
(6)

About Me

Consulting Manager,

Burntsand

• Project Manager and Business

Analyst focusing on SharePoint

• Working with SharePoint since

beta 2003 version

• 50 SharePoint

implementations

• Microsoft Certified Technology

Specialist

(7)

About My Company

• Leading systems integration firm founded in January

1996

• Microsoft partner with 2 gold competencies, 3 silver

• More than 350 blue chip clients

• Subsidiary of Open Text, local office in Waltham, MA

• Publicly traded on Toronto Stock Exchange (OTEX)

(8)

About the SharePoint Maturity Model

• Developed in Fall 2010 for the purpose of bringing

a

holistic

view to a SharePoint implementation,

and bringing standardization to the conversation

around functionality, best practices, and

improvement.

• Starts at 100 rather than 0

• Does NOT cover:

– Public-facing websites

– Compliance and regulatory issues

– Visual design and branding

• Version 1 published 5 November 2010.

(9)

About Microsoft’s SP Competencies

Ribbon UI

SharePoint Workspace SharePoint Mobile

Office Client & Web App Integration Standards Support

Tagging, Tag Cloud, Ratings Social Bookmarking

Blogs and Wikis My Sites

Activity Feeds

Profiles and Expertise Org Browser

Enterprise Content Types Metadata and Navigation Document Sets

Multi-stage Disposition

Audio and Video Content Types Remote Blob Storage

List Enhancements Social Relevance Phonetic Search Navigation FAST Integration Enhanced Pipeline PerformancePoint Services Excel Services Chart Web Part Visio Services Web Analytics

SQL Server Integration PowerPivot

Business Connectivity Services InfoPath Form Services

(10)

Area

Description

Publication

Presentation of content in SharePoint for consumption by a varied audience of

authenticated users. Areas of focus include navigation, presentation of content

(static vs. personalized), content organization and storage, customizations to the

template, and approvals and workflow.

Collaboration

Multiple individuals working jointly within SharePoint. Areas of focus include

provisioning & de-provisioning, templates, organization (finding a site),

archiving, using SP’s capabilities (i.e. versioning & doc mgmt, task mgmt,

calendar mgmt, discussion thread, surveys, workflow).

Business Process

Linked business activities with a defined trigger and outcome, standardized by

SharePoint and/or custom automated workflow processes. Areas of focus

include data (unstructured/structured), workflow, user security / roles,

reporting, tracking / auditing.

Search

The ability to query indexed content and return results that are ranked in order

of relevance to the search query. Areas of focus include scopes, display of

results, optimization, integration and connectors, and performance.

Competency Definitions - Core

(11)

Area

Description

People &

Communities

The human capital of the organization as represented in SharePoint by profiles,

MySites, and community spaces (the virtual spaces that support particular areas

of interest that may span or fall outside the organizational structure).

Composites &

Applications

Custom solutions specific to the needs of the business (traditionally served by

paper forms, Excel spreadsheets and/or Access databases) which may be

accomplished by multiple technologies working together.

Integration

Line of business data and/or content from a separate CMS integrated with the

system, allowing users to self-serve in a controlled yet flexible manner. Maturity

proceeds through integration with single system, multiple systems, Data

Warehouse, and external (partner/supplier or industry) data.

Insight

The means of viewing business data in the system. Maturity proceeds through

aggregation of views, drill-down and charting, actionability, and analytics and

trending.

(12)

Area

Description

Infrastructure

The hardware and processes that support the system. Areas of focus include

farm planning, server configuration, storage, backup/restore, monitoring, and

updates.

Staffing & Training

The human resources that support the system and the level of training with

which they are provided.

Customizations

Custom development and/or third-party products that extend the out-of-box

functionality of the system. Areas of focus include development environment,

management of source code, method of build and deployment, and

development tier.

Competency Definitions - Readiness

(13)

SharePoint

Level

Description

500

Optimizing

The particular area is functioning optimally and continuous improvement occurs based on defined and monitored metrics.

400

Predictable

The particular area is centrally supported, standardized, and in use across the entire organization. Governance is defined and followed.

300

Defined

The way the particular area is leveraged is defined and/or standardized, but not in use across the entire organization.

200

Managed

The particular area is managed by a central group (often IT), but the focus and definition varies by functional area.

100

Initial

The starting point of SharePoint use.

Ma

tu

ra

tion

(14)

The SharePoint Maturity Model – 1 – Core Concepts

Level

Publication

Collaboration

Business Process

Search

500

Optimizing

Content is personalized to the user. Content is shared across multiple functions and systems without duplication. Feedback mechanism on taxonomy is in place.

Automated tagging may be present.

Collaboration occurs outside the firewall – i.e. with external contributors. Automated processes exist for de-provisioning and archiving sites.

Power users can edit existing workflows to adapt them to changing business needs. Users have visibility into process efficiency & can provide feedback into process improvements. Workflows incorporate external users.

Users understand relationship of tagging to search results. Automated tagging may be used. High volumes can be handled.

400

Predictable

Content is monitored, maintained, some is targeted to specific groups. Usage is analyzed. Digital assets are managed appropriately. If more than one doc mgmt system is present, governance is defined.

Collaboration tools are used across the entire

organization. Email is captured & leveraged. Work is promoted from WIP to Final which is leverageable.

The majority of business processes are represented in the system and have audit trails. Mobile functionality is supported. Workflow scope is enterprise-level.

Content types and custom properties are leveraged in Advanced Search. Results customized to specific needs, may be actionable.

300

Defined

Site Columns/ Managed Metadata standardize the taxonomy. Page layouts & site templates are customized. Approval process is implemented.

Collaboration efforts extend sporadically to discussion threads, wikis, blogs, and doc libs with versioning. Site templates are developed for specific needs.

Workflows can recognize the user (i.e. knows “my

manager”). Content types are leveraged. Workflow scope spans departments or sites.

Search results are analyzed. Best bets and metadata properties are leveraged to aid the search experience.

200

Managed

Custom metadata is applied to content. Templates standardized across sites. Lists used rather than static HTML. Multiple document mgmt systems may be present w/out governance around purpose.

Mechanism is in place for new site requests. Collaboration efforts are collected in document libraries (links emailed rather than documents)

Business process is defined; some custom SP Designer workflows (or third-party tool) may be implemented. Workflow scope is at departmental level.

Custom scopes and iFilters employed to aid the search experience.

100

Initial

Navigation & taxonomy not formally considered. Little to no checks on content. Folder

structure is re-created from shared drives. Content that could be in lists is posted in Content Editor WP. Out of box site templates / layouts are used.

Out of box collaboration sites set up as needed without structure or organization. No formal process exists for requesting a new site.

Business process is loosely defined. Out of box workflows (approval, collect feedback) leveraged sporadically. A doc lib or list provides a central base of operations.

Out of box functionality for query, results, and scopes; some additional content sources may be indexed. Ma tu ra tion 14

Maturation also occurs along this vector

(15)

The SharePoint Maturity Model – 2 – Advanced Concepts

Ma

tu

ra

tion

Level

People and

Communities

Composites and

Applications

Integration

Insight

500

Optimizing

Users can edit certain profile data that writes back to AD or HRIS. MySites template is customized. Communities extend to external participants.

Forms connect with LOB data. New capabilities & requirements are surfaced & integrated into

downstream capabilities.

External data (partner/supplier or industry) is integrated with SP.

Analytics and trending are employed.

400

Predictable

Profile fields may integrate with LOB data. MySites are

centralized (only one instance). Communities flourish under governance.

InfoPath forms improve the user experience. Mobile functionality is supported.

Most of the systems that are desired to be integrated, are integrated. A data warehouse may be integrated with SP.

Items are actionable.

300

Defined

Custom profile fields reflect company culture; photos are updated from central source. MySites rolled out to all users, supported, trained. Community spaces connect a particular set of users.

Most critical business forms are online; some involve automated workflows.

Multiple systems are

integrated. Reports allow drill-down and charting.

200

Managed

MySites rolled out to pilot groups or users. Out-of-box profiiles implemented. Community spaces may be piloted.

Increasing use of SP lists to replace Excel spreadsheets and paper forms.

Applications are opened up to a larger group of users.

A single system is integrated

with SP. Reports are aggregated through customization.

100

Initial

Basic profile data imported from AD or other source. MySites host not created.

Some paper forms

converted to SP list forms. Many Excel spreadsheets, Access databases, paper forms still stored in / linked to from SharePoint.

Links to enterprise systems posted on SP site. Printed or exported business data is stored in doc libs.

Existing reports are used; data is brought together manually.

(16)

The SharePoint Maturity Model – 3 – Readiness Concepts

Ma

tur

atio

n

Level

Infrastructure

Staffing & Training

Customizations

500

Optimizing

System health & error logs monitored. Processes for archiving & de-provisioning are in place.

Top-down support in place; dedicated IT business analyst, server admin, helpdesk, training staff; empowered user

community. Multiple training offerings exist.

Deployment is fully automated via features . Source code is managed centrally as IP, re-usable and shareable.

400

Predictable

Backup/restore has been tested. Dev and QA environments are present. Administration may be improved via third-party tools. BLOB integration may be present.

IT has more than one resource knowledgeable on the system. Requests for new functionality are tracked and prioritized. An end-user training plan is in place.

Deployment is fully automated – solution package and scripts. Total Cost of Ownership is considered.

300

Defined

Number of servers is appropriate to demands and scalable for future growth. Dev

environment is present. Service Packs tested in QA and installed in a timely fashion.

SP evangelized around the organization by individual or small group. Content owners from some functional areas are trained and using the system. One IT resource knowledgeable on the system.

Mixed automated \ manual deployment process - some artifacts deployed via scripts, others by following list of manual steps. Source control is centralized.

200

Managed

Multiple server installlation or single-server is backed up on a regular basis.

SP evangelized to a subset of depts or functional areas by an individual; work mainly done by individual or small group. Training is informal, ad-hoc.

Changes are deployed from one environment to another using backup/restore. Source control is simple file storage.

100

Initial

Single-server installation, sometimes rogue . No plan for availability / disaster recovery.

One pioneer or small group pilots the product. No development, or development is done in Production. No QA / development environments. No source control. 16

Maturation also occurs along this vector

(17)

Self Evaluation Matrix

Date of Assessment

Years the organization has used SharePoint

Current SP Version (year + standard or enterprise if known)

# of users organization-wide

# of IT staff supporting SharePoint (combine part-timers &

include vendors if they are a regular part of your team)

Organization’s Industry

Go to

http://bit.ly/SMMExcelTemplate

for a quick way to graph this information!

Publication Collaboration Business Process

Search People & Communities

Composites & Applications

(18)

Self Evaluation Matrix – Filled-in Example

Publication Collaboration Business Process

Search People & Communities

Composites & Applications

Integration Insight Infrastructure Staffing & Training Customizations

500

Optimizing

400

Predictable

300

Defined

200

Managed

100

Initial 18

Go to

http://bit.ly/SMMExcelTemplate

for a quick way to graph this information!

Date of Assessment

1/29/11

Years the organization has used SharePoint

7

Current SP Version (year + standard or enterprise if known)

SP 2010 Enterprise

# of users organization-wide

50

# of IT staff supporting SharePoint (combine part-timers &

include vendors if they are a regular part of your team)

2.5

Organization’s Industry

Professional Services

100 199 200 299 300 399 400 499 500 599

(19)

Excel Template Available

(20)

Publication

Level

Maturity Level Definition

Competency

500

Optimizing

The particular area is functioning optimally and continuous improvement occurs based on defined and monitored metrics.

Content is personalized to the user. Content is shared across multiple functions and systems without

duplication. Feedback mechanism on taxonomy is in place. Automated tagging may be present.

400

Predictable

The particular area is centrally supported, standardized, and in use across the entire organization. Governance is defined and followed.

Content is monitored, maintained, some is targeted to specific groups. Usage is analyzed. Digital assets are managed appropriately. If more than one doc mgmt system is present, governance is defined.

300

Defined

The way the particular area is leveraged is defined and/or standardized, but not in use across the entire organization.

Site Columns/ Managed Metadata standardize the taxonomy. Page layouts & site templates are customized. Approval process is implemented.

200

Managed

The particular area is managed by a central group (often IT), but the focus and definition varies by functional area.

Custom metadata is applied to content. Templates standardized across sites. Lists used rather than static HTML. Multiple document mgmt systems may be present w/out governance around purpose.

100

Initial The starting point of SharePoint use.

Navigation & taxonomy not formally considered. Little to no checks on content. Folder structure is re-created from shared drives. Content that could be in lists is posted in Content Editor WP. Out of box site templates / layouts are used.

Presentation of content in SharePoint for consumption by a varied audience of

authenticated users. Areas of focus include navigation, presentation of content (static

vs. personalized), content organization and storage, customizations to the template,

and approvals and workflow.

(21)

Publication – 100-level example

(22)

Publication – 500-level example

22

Source: Burntsand

(23)

Collaboration

Level

Maturity Level Definition

Competency

500

Optimizing

The particular area is functioning

optimally and continuous improvement occurs based on defined and monitored metrics.

Collaboration occurs outside the firewall – i.e. with external contributors. Automated processes exist for de-provisioning and archiving sites.

400

Predictable

The particular area is centrally supported, standardized, and in use across the entire organization. Governance is defined and followed.

Collaboration tools are used across the entire organization. Email is captured & leveraged. Work is promoted from WIP to Final which is leverageable.

300

Defined

The way the particular area is leveraged is defined and/or standardized, but not in use across the entire organization.

Collaboration efforts extend sporadically to discussion threads, wikis, blogs, and doc libs with versioning. Site templates are developed for specific needs.

200

Managed

The particular area is managed by a

central group (often IT), but the focus and definition varies by functional area.

Mechanism is in place for new site requests. Collaboration efforts are collected in document libraries (links emailed rather than documents)

100

Initial The starting point of SharePoint use.

Out of box collaboration sites set up as needed without structure or organization. No formal process exists for requesting a new site.

Multiple individuals working jointly within SharePoint. Areas of focus include

(24)

Collaboration – 100-level example

24

Source: Burntsand

(25)

Collaboration– 500-level example

(26)

Business Process

Level

Maturity Level Definition

Competency

500

Optimizing

The particular area is functioning optimally and continuous improvement occurs based on defined and monitored metrics.

Power users can edit existing workflows to adapt them to changing business needs. Users have visibility into process efficiency & can provide feedback into process improvements. Workflows incorporate external users.

400

Predictable

The particular area is centrally supported, standardized, and in use across the entire organization. Governance is defined and followed.

The majority of business processes are represented in the system and have audit trails. Mobile functionality is supported. Workflow scope is enterprise-level.

300

Defined

The way the particular area is leveraged is defined and/or standardized, but not in use across the entire organization.

Workflows can recognize the user (i.e. knows “my manager”). Content types are leveraged. Workflow scope spans departments or sites.

200

Managed

The particular area is managed by a central group (often IT), but the focus and definition varies by functional area.

Business process is defined; some custom SP Designer workflows (or third-party tool) may be implemented. Workflow scope is at departmental level.

100

Initial The starting point of SharePoint use.

Business process is loosely defined. Out of box workflows (approval, collect feedback) leveraged sporadically. A doc lib or list provides a central base of operations.

Linked business activities with a defined trigger and outcome, standardized by

SharePoint and/or custom automated workflow processes. Areas of focus include

data (unstructured/structured), workflow, user security / roles, reporting, tracking /

auditing.

(27)

Business Process – 100-level example

(28)

Business Process – 500-level example

28

Source: Nielsen Norman Group Intranet Design Annual 2010, Enbridge intranet, p. 63

(29)

Search

Level

Maturity Level Definition

Competency

500

Optimizing

The particular area is functioning optimally and continuous improvement occurs based on defined and monitored metrics.

Users understand relationship of tagging to search results. Automated tagging may be used. High volumes can be handled.

400

Predictable

The particular area is centrally supported, standardized, and in use across the entire organization. Governance is defined and followed.

Content types and custom properties are leveraged in Advanced Search. Results customized to specific needs, may be actionable.

300

Defined

The way the particular area is leveraged is defined and/or standardized, but not in use across the entire organization.

Search results are analyzed. Best bets and metadata properties are leveraged to aid the search experience.

200

Managed

The particular area is managed by a central group (often IT), but the focus and definition varies by functional area.

Custom scopes and iFilters employed to aid the search experience.

100

Initial The starting point of SharePoint use.

Out of box functionality for query, results, and scopes; some additional content sources may be indexed.

(30)

Search – 100-level example

30 4/22/2011 Copyright 2011 Sadalit Van Buren

(31)

Search – 500-level example

(32)

People and Communities

Level

Maturity Level Definition

Competency

500

Optimizing

The particular area is functioning optimally and continuous improvement occurs based on defined and monitored metrics. MySites may be allowed for external users.

Users can edit certain profile data that writes back to AD or HRIS. MySites template is customized.

Communities extend to external participants.

400

Predictable

The particular area is centrally supported, standardized, and in use across the entire organization. Governance is defined and followed.

Profile fields may integrate with LOB data. MySites are centralized (only one instance). Communities flourish under governance.

300

Defined

The way the particular area is leveraged is defined and/or standardized, but not in use across the entire organization.

Custom profile fields reflect company culture; photos are updated from central source.

MySites rolled out to all users, supported, trained. Community spaces connect a particular set of users.

200

Managed

The particular area is managed by a central group (often IT), but the focus and definition varies by functional area.

MySites rolled out to pilot groups or users. Out-of-box profiiles implemented. Community spaces may be piloted.

100

Initial The starting point of SharePoint use.

Basic profile data imported from AD or other source. MySites host not created.

The human capital of the organization as represented in SharePoint by profiles,

MySites, and community spaces (the virtual spaces that support particular areas of

interest that may span or fall outside the organizational structure).

(33)

People and Communities – 100-level example

(34)

People and Communities – 500-level example

Source: Burntsand

(35)

Composites and Applications

Level

Maturity Level Definition

Competency

500

Optimizing

The particular area is functioning optimally and continuous improvement occurs based on defined and monitored metrics.

Forms connect with LOB data. New capabilities & requirements are surfaced & integrated into downstream capabilities.

400

Predictable

The particular area is centrally supported, standardized, and in use across the entire organization. Governance is defined and followed.

InfoPath forms improve the user experience. Mobile functionality is supported.

300

Defined

The way the particular area is leveraged is defined and/or standardized, but not in use across the entire organization.

Most critical business forms are online; some involve automated workflows.

200

Managed

The particular area is managed by a central group (often IT), but the focus and definition varies by functional area.

Increasing use of SP lists to replace Excel spreadsheets and paper forms. Applications are opened up to a larger group of users.

100

Initial The starting point of SharePoint use.

Some paper forms converted to SP list forms. Many Excel spreadsheets, Access databases, paper forms still stored in / linked to from SharePoint.

(36)

Composites & Applications – 100-level example

Source: Burntsand

(37)

Composites & Applications – 500-level example

(38)

Integration

Level

Maturity Level Definition

Competency

500

Optimizing

The particular area is functioning optimally and continuous improvement occurs based on defined and monitored metrics.

External data (partner/supplier or industry) is integrated with SP.

400

Predictable

The particular area is centrally supported, standardized, and in use across the entire organization. Governance is defined and followed.

Most of the systems that are desired to be integrated, are integrated. A data warehouse may be integrated with SP.

300

Defined

The way the particular area is leveraged is defined and/or standardized, but not in use across the entire organization.

Multiple systems are integrated.

200

Managed

The particular area is managed by a central group (often IT), but the focus and definition varies by functional area.

A single system is integrated with SP.

100

Initial The starting point of SharePoint use.

Links to enterprise systems posted on SP site. Printed or exported business data is stored in doc libs.

Line of business data and/or content from a separate CMS integrated with the

system, allowing users to self-serve in a controlled yet flexible manner. Maturity

proceeds through integration with single system, multiple systems, Data Warehouse,

and external (partner/supplier or industry) data.

(39)

Insight

Level

Maturity Level Definition

Competency

500

Optimizing

The particular area is functioning optimally and continuous improvement occurs based on defined and monitored metrics.

Analytics and trending are employed.

400

Predictable

The particular area is centrally supported, standardized, and in use across the entire organization. Governance is defined and followed.

Items are actionable.

300

Defined

The way the particular area is leveraged is defined and/or standardized, but not in use across the entire organization.

Reports allow drill-down and charting.

200

Managed

The particular area is managed by a central group (often IT), but the focus and definition varies by functional area.

Reports are aggregated through customization.

100

Initial The starting point of SharePoint use.

Existing reports are used; data is brought together manually.

(40)

Insight – 100-level example

40 4/22/2011 Copyright 2011 Sadalit Van Buren

(41)

Insight – 500-level example

(42)

Infrastructure

Level

Maturity Level Definition

Competency

500

Optimizing

The particular area is functioning optimally and continuous improvement occurs based on defined and monitored metrics.

System health & error logs monitored.

Processes for archiving & de-provisioning are in place. Disaster Recovery plan is in place.

400

Predictable

The particular area is centrally supported, standardized, and in use across the entire organization. Governance is defined and followed. Users trust the system.

Backup/restore has been tested. Dev and QA environments are present. Administration may be improved via third-party tools. BLOB

integration may be present.

300

Defined

The way the particular area is leveraged is defined and/or standardized, but not in use across the entire organization. Remote access is available.

Number of servers is appropriate to demands and scalable for future growth. Dev

environment is present. Service Packs tested in QA and installed in a timely fashion.

200

Managed

The particular area is managed by a central group (often IT), but the focus and definition varies by functional area.

Multiple server installlation or single-server is backed up on a regular basis.

100

Initial The starting point of SharePoint use.

Single-server installation, sometimes rogue . No plan for availability / disaster recovery.

The hardware and processes that support the system. Areas of focus include farm

planning, server configuration, storage, backup/restore, monitoring, and updates.

(43)

Staffing and Training

Level

Maturity Level Definition

Competency

500

Optimizing

The particular area is functioning optimally and continuous improvement occurs based on defined and monitored metrics.

Top-down support in place; dedicated IT business analyst, server admin, helpdesk, training staff;

empowered user community. Multiple training offerings exist.

400

Predictable

The particular area is centrally supported, standardized, and in use across the entire organization. Governance is defined and followed.

IT has more than one resource knowledgeable on the system. Requests for new functionality are tracked and prioritized. An end-user training plan is in place.

300

Defined

The way the particular area is leveraged is defined and/or standardized, but not in use across the entire organization.

SP evangelized around the organization by individual or small group. Content owners from some functional areas are trained and using the system. One IT resource knowledgeable on the system.

200

Managed

The particular area is managed by a central group (often IT), but the focus and definition varies by functional area.

SP evangelized to a subset of depts or functional areas by an individual; work mainly done by individual or small group. Training is informal, ad-hoc.

100

Initial The starting point of SharePoint use. One pioneer or small group pilots the product.

(44)

Customizations

Level

Maturity Level Definition

Competency

500

Optimizing

The particular area is functioning optimally and continuous improvement occurs based on defined and monitored metrics.

Deployment is fully automated via features . Source code is managed centrally as IP, re-usable and shareable.

400

Predictable

The particular area is centrally supported, standardized, and in use across the entire organization. Governance is defined and followed.

Deployment is fully automated – solution package and scripts. Total Cost of Ownership is

considered.

300

Defined

The way the particular area is leveraged is defined and/or standardized, but not in use across the entire organization.

Mixed automated \ manual deployment process - some artifacts deployed via scripts, others by following list of manual steps. Source control is centralized.

200

Managed

The particular area is managed by a central group (often IT), but the focus and definition varies by functional area.

Changes are deployed from one environment to another using backup/restore. Source control is simple file storage.

100

Initial The starting point of SharePoint use.

No development, or development is done in

Production. No QA / development environments. No source control.

Custom development and/or third-party products that extend the out-of-box

functionality of the system. Areas of focus include development environment,

management of source code, method of build and deployment, and development

tier.

(45)

Call to Action

• Fill out the SMM self-assessment!

• Send me your data to help build a data model

for everyone

(your name & company name will remain

anonymous.)

• Contact me

(contact info on next slide)

– With Questions

– With Feedback

– If you’d like help assessing your SP

(46)

Contact Information

Sadie Van Buren

[email protected]

• Twitter: @sadalit

• LinkedIn:

http://www.linkedin.com/in/sadalit

(47)

Resources

Self Evaluation Matrix:

http://bit.ly/SMMpptMatrix

Excel Template for the Self-Assessment:

(48)

Credits

SharePoint Maturity Model (Customizations) from Hugo

Esperanca’s blog.

http://activeobjects.blogspot.com/2008/07/sharepoint-maturity-model-smm_20.html

Rate Your Organization's SharePoint Collaboration Maturity,

from Lee Reed on EUSP:

http://www.endusersharepoint.com/2010/01/07/adoption-

tip-4-of-8-rate-your-organizations-sharepoint-collaboration-maturity/

Capability Maturity Model:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capability_Maturity_Model

(49)

Acknowledgements

• Thanks to Mark Miller at End User SharePoint

and the folks at for hosting this

presentation.

• My gratitude to Vinnie Alwani, Harold

Brenneman, John Francis, Sue Hanley,

Richard Harbridge, Mike Landino, Chris

McNulty, Mark Miller, Ed Podbelski, Ray

(50)

50

Thank you!

References

Related documents

™ Conform analytic data access and delivery to enterprise security and governance requirements With Data Virtualization software you get:.. ™ One place to go for analytic

This study reveals some significant points: (1) The pattern of interaction between the family of former terrorists convict and surrounding communities can be

Major Goolsby’s Pub & Grill Miller Time Pub & Grill Milwaukee Brat House Milwaukee Brewing Company Milwaukee Chophouse Mo’s a Place for Steaks Mo’s Irish Pub Milwaukee

Day 20 PCR results (Figure 2) showed one faint positive band on one of the 2 yolk samples collected from that embryo at that time point, but no other positives were detected. Day 21

For the upcoming 2013 reporting period (2014 administration), Pioneer ACOs will need to choose a CMS-certified vendor and pay to have the survey conducted.. For the upcoming

Mitigate information risks Deliver continuous access to Support information retention policies Securely share information Information Compliance Information

Joshua Pruyn (former Admissions Representative, Alta College, Inc., Denver CO), Testimony before the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions, For-Profit Schools:

Even in those cases where the states have used some of the securitization receipts to fund tobacco-prevention efforts (and other public health programs), the states usually end