• No results found

Session Objectives. Economic Stimulus Package. Electronic Medical Records Evaluation, Selection & Implementation Process

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Session Objectives. Economic Stimulus Package. Electronic Medical Records Evaluation, Selection & Implementation Process"

Copied!
9
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Electronic Medical Records

Evaluation, Selection &

Implementation Process

Presented by:

Sherri L. Boston, MBA, COE, OCS

Session Objectives

Provide an overview of the Electronic Health

Records (EHR) provisions in the Economic

Stimulus Package.

Explain the EMR evaluation, selection and

implementation process.

Review the tools available to assist the practice

and staff during the EMR review and

implementation process.

President Obama signed H.R. 1, the “American Recovery and

Reinvestment Act of 2009” (ARRA) into law on 2/17/09.

Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act

(HITECH) part of ARRA; encourages adoption of electronic health

records (EHRs) through incentive payments.

EHR provisions in HITECH:

 $19.2 billion available to encourage adoption of EHR.

 Qualified providers and hospitals earn incentive benefits beginning

in 2011 by demonstrating “meaningful use” of EHR systems.

 Penalties for non-compliance begin in 2015.

On 1/13/10 the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and

the Office of National Coordinator of Health Information Technology

(ONC) published two coordinated sets of regulations for EHR

incentives.

(2)

ONC and CMS Regulations

HHS will accept comments on these regulations through March 15, 2010.

ONC

“Interim Final Rule”

Certified EHR

Technology

Outlines requirements to be “certified:” • Standards • Implementation • Specifications • Certification Criteria Does not change HIPAA requirements

CMS

“Proposed Rule”

Meaningful Use

Outlines criteria for demonstrating meaningful use of certified technology Provides proposed calculation and payment of incentives

Certified EHR Technology

Definitions:

“Qualified EHR:” An electronic record of health-related

information on an individual that:

1. Includes patient demographics and clinical health information.

2. Has the capacity to:

• Provide clinical decision support.

• Support MD order entry.

• Capture and query information relevant to health care quality.

• Exchange electronic health information with, and integrate

such information from, other sources.

“Certified EHR Technology:” Meets requirements of “qualified

EHR” and has been tested and certified by ONC program,

meeting all certification criteria.

Meaningful Use

Requirements:

HITECH Act requires that eligible professionals must be

“meaningful EHR user” of certified EHR technology and

meet three requirements:

1.

Demonstrate use of certified EHR technology in a

meaningful manner.

2. Demonstrate that such certified EHR technology is

connected in a manner that provides for electronic

exchange of health information, in accordance with

laws and standards, to promote quality health care.

3. Using certified EHR technology, submit information

(3)

Phased Roll-Out of Meaningful Use Criteria

CMS proposed rule sets forth three stages for demonstrating

meaningful use.

Stage 1: Criteria focus on electronically recording patient

data to facilitate coordination of care, implementation of

clinical decision support, and reporting clinical quality

measures.

Stages 2 & 3: Criteria not yet defined; will focus on

interoperability of EHR technology, increase in efficiency,

and improvement in population health.

Phased roll-out allows for incrementally improving and

expanding the adoption and implementation of EHR

technology.

Stages of Meaningful Use

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2011

Stage 1

Stage 1

Stage 2

Stage 2

Stage 3

2012

Stage 1

Stage 1

Stage 2

Stage 3

2013

Stage 1

Stage 2

Stage 3

2014

Stage 1

Stage 3

2015

Stage 3

Stage of Meaningful Use Criteria by Payment Year

• Only the Stage 1 criteria are currently proposed and include 25 objectives and functionality measures for eligible professionals.

• CMS is expected to provide guidance on Stage 2 & 3 measures beginning in 2013.

EMR Incentive Payments

Proposed rule calls for Part B Medicare carriers to make

payments once “meaningful use” is demonstrated for the

applicable reporting period.

Incentive payment is to equal 75% of the physician’s

allowable Medicare charges for up to five years; subject to a

maximum amount per physician.

Annual cap may be higher for professionals in designated

health professional shortage area.

Payment ceiling declines each year; penalizing late adopters.

To qualify for the full incentive benefit of $44,000,

(4)

EMR Incentive Payments

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2011

$18,000

2012

$12,000

$18,000

2013

$8,000

$12,000

$15,000

2014

$4,000

$8,000

$12,000

$12,000

2015

$2,000

$4,000

$8,000

$8,000

$0

2016

$2,000

$4,000

$4,000

$0

Total

$44,000

$44,000

$39,000

$24,000

$0

Maximum Annual Payment by Year Implemented

Payment Adjustments Beginning in 2015

Penalties for non-compliance begin in 2015.

Medicare reimbursement reduced by 1%, 2%, and 3% in

2015, 2016, and 2017 and each subsequent calendar year.

HITECH Act authorizes CMS to further reduce

reimbursement in 2018 if less than 75% of eligible

professionals are EHR users.

Proposed rule has an exemption for professionals due to a

significant hardship; however, no definition of significant

hardship has been provided by CMS.

(5)

Identify EMR Project Team ►Define clear vision of project

►Identify project team and include representatives from management, clinical, and physician teams

►Define scope of project and develop work plan outlining details of the process.

EMR Evaluation, Selection, Implementation

Identify EMR Project Team

Evaluation Phase

►Complete a self-assessment of your EMR “readiness”

►Review articles and publications related to EMR

►Evaluate risks/benefits of EMR implementation

►Make decision to go forward or delay selection and implementation process

EMR Evaluation, Selection, Implementation

(6)

Article:

Financial Impact of an EMR System

Identify EMR Project Team

Evaluation Phase

Investigational Phase

►Collect data from practices currently using EMR, schedule site visits

►Determine practice design requirements for EMR utilization

►Number of users

►Hardware needs

►Networking and connectivity

►Interface options with existing EPM

►Interface capability with diagnostic equipment

►Select 4 – 5 EMR vendors; send RFPs

EMR Evaluation, Selection, Implementation

(7)

Identify EMR Project Team

Evaluation Phase

Investigational Phase

Analysis & Decision Phase

►Identify 10 – 15 priority needs for EMR

►Complete a comparison of the EMR vendor RFPs

►Perform a cost benefit analysis

►Compare practice needs and costs with results of RFP

►Determine top 2 – 3 vendors, schedule on-site demonstrations

►Utilize EMR Project Team to make EMR selection

►Evaluate financing options

►Negotiate and sign hardware/software contracts

EMR Evaluation, Selection, Implementation

Sample Cost Benefit Analysis

Identify EMR Project Team

Evaluation Phase

Investigational Phase

Analysis & Decision Phase

Pre-Implementation Phase

►Identify implementation team

►Set realistic timeline for training & implementation

►Review and redesign every work process

►Evaluate hardware needs; purchase

►Arrange for networking/connectivity

►Assess and determine method of “phase in” to EMR with final goal of paperless

►Customize office visit templates

►Determine which old patient information is to be scanned into the new system; begin the scanning process

(8)

Identify EMR Project Team

Evaluation Phase

Investigational Phase

Analysis & Decision Phase

Pre-Implementation Phase

Training Phase

►Designate Training Team

►Develop training plan (preliminary training/vendor training)

►Arrange basic computer skill training for staff needing assistance

►Schedule preliminary training for staff and physicians

►Schedule vendor on-site training

►Implement vendor training plan for both staff and physicians (include hands-on training)

EMR Evaluation, Selection, Implementation

Implementation Phase Identify EMR Project Team

Evaluation Phase

Investigational Phase

Analysis & Decision Phase

Pre-Implementation Phase

Training Phase

►Modify patient schedule before going “live”

►Select day of week to launch EMR

►Make certain vendor trainers are present

►Assemble staff early to review processes

►Debrief at the end of the first day; adjust processes as needed

►Conduct regular meetings to address EMR concerns and needs

►Provide periodic quality review of charts

►Celebrate!

EMR Evaluation, Selection, Implementation

Implementation Phase Identify EMR Project Team

Evaluation Phase

Investigational Phase

Analysis & Decision Phase

Pre-Implementation Phase

Training Phase

►EMR evaluation, selection, and implementation is a long, difficult process; however it is one with many positive implications for the practice. Consider the following:

►Examine practice needs and resources carefully before deciding to proceed with EMR implementation.

►Make certain there is strong leadership from both administration and physicians

►Set realistic time goals for the project

(9)

Implementation Phase Identify EMR Project Team

Evaluation Phase

Investigational Phase

Analysis & Decision Phase

Pre-Implementation Phase

Training Phase

►Utilize a team to maximize efforts in planning and implementation

►Plan – Train – Implement – Reevaluate – Redesign – Retrain – Implement! It’s an ongoing process

►Celebrate accomplishments! Most practices with EMR would NEVER want to return to paper charts. If EMR is right for the practice, the arduous process is worth it!

►Both the challenges and opportunities can be yours!

EMR Evaluation, Selection, Implementation

References

Related documents

Und im Laufe der Geschichte entwickelt er sich zu einem gefühlvollen Kelvin, der zwar logisch nachvoll- ziehen kann, dass er nicht der echten „Rheya“ begegnet ist, sich jedoch

REVIEW AND DOWNLOAD THIS COMPLETE USER GUIDE OR TROUBLESHOOTING SECTION CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP MANAGEMENT EBOOK SOFTWARE, TO PROVIDES THE ANSWER AS WELL.. AS ANY

The observed indirect effect of self-efficacy on affective commitment with the organization, totally mediated by work engagement, is consistent with the postulates of the JDR

HALF A SIXPENCE Characters Kipps Sid Buggins Pearce Kate Victoria Flo Shalford Mrs Walsingham Helen Ann Young Walsingham Chitterlow Laura Plus Ensemble, who play: Young Kipps,

 Pricing should first perform the checks to return a validating carrier eligible for electronic ticketing (i.e.: having electronic ticketing agreements with all marketing

In this chapter, I gathered a mosaic of fragments from discussions, writings, vid- eos, comics, and social media posts to render an imperfect image of how the SPRs per- ceive

All the above information has been gathered from multiple sources that I have managed to track down, so hopefully it will all be correct and accurate to my knowledge, any additions

5 Copies of publications are required alongside the thesis submitted for examination only. In the event of a successful examination, candidates are not required to supply copies