• No results found

Air emissions reduction strategy

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Air emissions reduction strategy"

Copied!
17
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Pemex Exploración y Producción (PEP)

Air emissions reduction strategy

Natural Gas STAR Implementation Workshop Global Methane Initiative

Denver, Colorado. April, 2012

(2)

Agenda

• Introduction

• Business Plan 2010-2024

• Emission reduction strategy

• Emission sources and reduction opportunities

• Base line

1

(3)

Introduction

2

• Emissions to air from the oil and gas industry:

• Pollutants as SOx and Nox affect human health, and

• Carbon Dioxide (CO

2

), Methane (CH

4

) and BC contribute to global warming.

• Nowadays, many industries implement actions to reduce in their processes these emissions.

• PEP, one of the four subsidiaries of Petróleos Mexicanos, is implementing a strategy to reduce air emissions, aligned to the Pemex Business Plan

PEMEX Value Chain

Production and separation of oil and

gas Transport and

hydrocarbon conditioning

Processing

Refining

Distribution

Exportation / domestic consumption Exploration and

development

(4)

During 2009 the estimated GHG emission of PEMEX reached 71 millions of tons/y of CO 2 e

6

Total 71

66

Electric energy consumption

0

Leaks 5

Fuel consumption

10

Venting 11

Gas flaring

46

40

SOURCE: SISPA, API,BDI

PEMEX’s emission inventory, 2009 mmtCO

2

e

▪ Gas flaring

represented 64% of total emission, being Cantarell the main source

▪ It is estimated that with re-injection of gas

project at Cantarell, 5.6 mmt/y of CO

2

e to air will be avoided

Mitigation by gas injection at Cantarell

3

(5)

SOURCES: National Geophysical Data Center (NGDC) 2008 and Carbon Declaration Project, companiesi internet web pages , equipo global v2.0 (Información estimada por observaciones satelitales)

PEP is located at the fifth spot in terms of GHG emissions in Mexico, and the country is twelfth in gas flaring in the international scenario.

Gas flaring,

Billons of cubic metres (BCM)

1.8 1.8 1.9 1.9 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.6 2.6 2.7 3.0 3.1 3.5 3.8 5.2 5.5 7.0

10.4 15.1

40.6

Kuwait Canada Malaysia Oman China USA_Combined Indonesia Venezuela Mexico Uzbekistan Qatar Angola Saudi_Arabia Libya Kazakhstan Algeria Iraq Iran Nigeria Russia

27 53

69 71

99 104

121

179

National Level Economic Sector Emissions,

(mmtCO2e)

Buildings Farming Forestry

Oil and Gas

Non oil industry Waste Management Electricity Generation

Transport

4

(6)

Profitable Growth Planning and Operating Excellence

Improvement of project planning and

implementation

Optimization of production, distribution, and commercialization

Application of best Safety, Health and Environmental practices Organization and

Knowledge

Technology modernization

Development of human talent

Focusing the organization to business

objectives

Social

Responsibility

C

▪ Environmental protection and sustainability

Improve

relationship with communities 8

9

10 5

6

11

7 12

PEP’s Business Plan (2010-2025). One objective is focused on being a clean and socially responsible company

Increase oil production

Increase the reserve inventory

Improve the implementation capacity

Optimization of the investment

expenditures 1

2

3

4

5

2010-2025 Objectives

Maintain production of oil (2.4- 3.0 mmbd)

Maintain production of gas (6.0 y 7.2 mmmpcd)

Reestablishment of 100% of the proven reserves as of 2012

Maintain the production costs

Achieve zero accidents goal

Achievement of public perception a as socially responsible company.

(7)

Main sources of emission in PEP’s operations

PEP’s total emissions

Gas flaring

1. Gas flaring emissions:

CO2 from gas combustion

CH4 from incomplete combustion of gas

Gas Venting

2. Gas released to the atmosphere

Vapours in storage vessels

Degasification of drilling mud

Pipeline maintenance

Fuel consumption

3. Emissions derived from fuel consumption:

Dynamic equipment operation (Pumps, turbines, compressors)

Electric generation.

Fugitive Emissions

4. Emissions derived from operative activities (leaks)

Pipelines and its components

Dynamic equipment

Static equipment and instrumentation

Due to accidents

6

(8)

PEP will improve its environmental protection performance through five programs:

▪ Improvement of the gas utilization

▪ Development of an investment portfolio of projects to mitigate atmospheric emissions.

▪ Systematic management of environmental topics

▪ Support reforestation and ecosystem protection.

Programs

Challenges

Infrastructure

to increase associated Gas utilization

Re injection of gas

Management of oil wells with high gas-oil ratio

Investment portfolio for gas utilization projects.

A

Strategies to mitigate emissions to air (energy efficiency)

Definition of the GHG mitigation strategy.

Energy savings programs

Definition of the process model

Participation in national and international partnerships to support mitigation projects (GMI, GGFR, EC and ARPEL).

B

Clean Industry Certificates

(environmental audits)

Facilities to be certified

Implementation of best practices C

Remediation of

environmental liabilities

Remediation of the areas and dams considered to be environmental liabilities D

Efficient use of water

Assure the efficient use, handling and disposition

E

Activities

7

(9)

PEP’s emission reduction strategy is focused in three action lines:

Action Lines

1. Increase the gas utilization

• Accomplish the National Hydrocarbons Commission´s regulation

• Reduction of gas flaring and venting

• Capacity for gas processing

• Enhancement oil recovery

2. Reduce Methane Emissions

• Evaporation in tanks

• Efficiency of flare systems

• Fugitive emissions reduction Reduction of

PEP’s Emissions Objective

8

PEP must take accomplish the National Hydrocarbons Commission (CNH) dispositions on gas utilization and flaring.

3. Increase the energy efficiency – Equipment efficiency

– Heat recovery

(10)

Specific goals have been defined for each mitigation aspect

Action

Increase the utilization of associated gas

Flaring efficiency

Reduce gas evaporation in tanks.

Substitution of seals in compressors.

Substitution of pneumatic equipment

Thermal efficiency

Cogeneration Gas utilization

Impact

Total emissions abatement Mitigation

Total of emission per unit barrel of oil equivalent

Maintain gas flaring below the maximum level allowed by CNH

Reach at least 98% efficiency in flares

Decrease of 36% in the loss of gas to evaporation in tanks.

Substitution of wet seals in 36% of the compressors

Substitution of 36% of self-contained pneumatic equipment.

Increase of 20% of thermal efficiency in 36% of equipments

Reduction in 15 mmpcd of fuel gas by usage of thermal currents.

Cogeneration of 100 MW of electric energy

Specific Goals

Mitigation of 48 million of tons of CO2 equivalent by 2024

A maximum of 14.25 kgCO2e / BPCE Carbon Intensity

Methane emissions reduction

Increase in energetic efficiency

9

(11)

To estimate PEP’s future emissions for 2010 – 2024, three scenarios were constructed

3. High Mitigation 1. Inertial 2. CNH Procedures

Gas utilization equal to the registered in 2009

Average electric consumption per produced barrel equal to the historic average reported

Substitution to high efficiency flares

Gas flaring Flaring in accordance to the defined

procedures of CNH as of 2011

Average electric consumption per produced barrel equal to the historic average

Indirect

Installation of a 250 MW cogeneration system

Average electric consumption per produced barrel equal to the historic average reported in SISPA

Gas evaporation equal to average in 2009

85% reduction of evaporation losses in tanks due to modifications to the stabilizer systems, installation of tanks with floating roofs and vapour recovery systems.

Venting

Decrease factor by evaporation

Emission factor per billion cubic feet of gas estimated by API

Emission factor per day of perforation estimated by API

Combustion of barrel produced per production asset equal to the reported 2009

Increase the thermal efficiency of 100% of the compressors

Implementation heat recuperation projects

Fuel Consump-

tion

Combustion of barrel produced per production asset equal to the reported 2009

Emission factors per oil well, pipeline length and equipment, estimated by API

Substitution of 100% of wet seals in equipments.

Substitution of 100% of pneumatic equipment for self contained equipment.

Fugitive emission

Emission factors per oil well, pipeline length and equipment, estimated by API

10

(12)

It is estimated that with the implementation of these scenarios, PEP’s emission will be located between14 y 69 mmtCO 2 e in 2024

FUENTE: Análisis de equipo

Total emissions for PEP 2009-2024 (Millions of tons CO

2

e/y)

69

33

14

10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75

24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13

12 11 10 09

CNH procedures Inertial

High mitigation

11

(13)

Collaboration PEP - Global Methane Initiative(GMI)

12

 Global Methane Initiative is an international initiative that promotes the recovery and use of methane as a clean energy source.

 GMI started in 2004 as an association of countries, and currently is integrated by near 40 countries.

 On behalf of the Mexican Government, Pemex is a co-chair of the Oil and Gas Subcommittee of GMI

 This association’s aims are the reduction of global methane emission reductions to:

• Encourage economic growth

• Increase energetic security

• Improve air quality and industrial safety

• Reduce greenhouse gas emissions

(14)

Collaboration between PEMEX- Global Methane Initiative

13

1. Project Identification

• Measuring and diagnostic studies in working areas.

• Fugitive emissions reduction activities

▫ Technology substitution projects

• Training PEMEX’s personnel

▫ Courses and workshops at workplace.

▫ Participation in international conferences

2. Development of strategies and implantation policies

Development of emission inventory (Base line)

▫ Inventory and base line construction for CH

4

and CO

2

▫ Marginal abatement cost model (MAC)

▫ Measures and profitable project analysis for PEMEX

▫ Identification of mitigation projects

(15)

Activities carried on with Global Methane Initiatives (GMI)

14

22 CH

4

Emission measurements campaigns

• Gas processing plants Cactus, Ciudad PEMEX, Nuevo PEMEX, Poza Rica, Burgos.

• Gas compression centers: Cunduacán, Atasta, José Colomo and Samaria II

• Production Field Nejo 1, Activo Integral Burgos

• Ammonia plant: CPQ Cosoleacaque

• Production Platform Abkatun - D

• Chilapilla y Jose Colomo Fields

• Recollection Station San Roman

• Vernet Battery

• Maritime terminal Dos Bocas

• Gas compression station and battery Ogarrio 4

• Gas compression station and battery Cinco Presidentes 4

• Cárdenas Pipeline sector

(16)

Final remarks

15

• Nowadays, several oil and gas companies implement actions plans to reduce air emissions in its operations (SOx, NOx, CO2, CH4, and BC)

• During 2009 the estimated GHG emission of PEMEX reached 71 millions of tons of CO2e. Gas flaring represented 64% of total emission, being Cantarell the main source

• Pemex Exploración y Producción (PEP) is implementing a strategy to reduce air emissions, aligned to the Pemex Business Plan. One objective of the PEP’s Business Plan (2010-2025) is focused on being a clean and socially responsible company

• PEP is located at the fifth spot in terms of GHG emissions in Mexico, and the country is twelfth in gas flaring in the international scenario.

• The main sources of emission in PEP are: Gas flaring and venting, fuel consumption and fugitive emissions

• PEP will improve its environmental protection performance through five programs: increase associated gas utilization, energy efficiency projects, environmental audits, remediation of environmental liabilities, efficient use of water.

• Pemex participates in several alliances (Global Methane Initiative (GMI), Global Gas Flaring

Reduction (GGFR), Environment Canada and ARPEL); this partnership has been very productive to help Pemex to recognize the importance of the emissions to air issue and to develop several actions to mitigate them.

efficiency

(17)

Javier Bocanegra Petroleos Mexicanos

Corporate Operations Direction [email protected]

16

Thank you!

Miguel Angel Granados

Pemex Exploración y Producción

Strategic Planning Management

[email protected]

References

Related documents

In God’s Story, Your Story, popular pastor and bestselling author Max Lucado will inspire you to see how your own day-to-day story intersects with God’s grand, overarching epic

University of Minnesota Interdisciplinary Informatics Seed Grant (Principal Investigator) 2011-12 University of Minnesota, Institute for Health Informatics Seed Grant

In the Ernst and Young Transfer Pricing 1997 Global Survey, it was found that 88 percent of the companies interviewed world-wide believed that the single most

This is because corporations largely use capital input services from the assets they own (generally reported on their balance sheets), for which no reference market price is ready

Instead of solving the inverse problem numerically, we propose to directly learn the inverse mapping from EC signals to crack profiles with a deep encoder-decoder convolutional

De Marco and Lister’s research into telephone interrupt recovery times was carried out on software developers, and the 15 minutes it takes a software developer to recovery from

Insurance(University of Karlsruhe), Quantitative Methods in Finance Conference (Australia), Symposium on the measurament of Market and Credit Risks" (ETH, Switzerland), Finance