• No results found

Foreign held U S government securities and monetary policy in United States

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Foreign held U S government securities and monetary policy in United States"

Copied!
19
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Foreign-held US Government Securities and Monetary

Policy in the United States

J O S E P H L . L U C I A

T

H E A m e r i c a n d e f i c i t i n t h e balance o f p a y m e n t s o f recent years has h a d its c o u n t e r p a r t i n t h e a c c u m u l a t i o n o f U S g o v e r n m e n t securities i n t h e hands o f f o r e i g n e r s . D o l l a r s earned b y f o r e i g n e r s h a v e been, t o a l a r g e e x t e n t , i n v e s t e d i n U S g o v e r n m e n t securities. I n 1966, f o r e i g n official i n s t i t u t i o n s , m a i n l y f o r e i g n c e n t r a l b a n k s , h e l d 6-316 b i l l i o n d o l l a r s i n U S T r e a s u r y b i l l s ; b y M a y o f 1973 t h i s t o t a l h a d risen t o 35-736 b i l l i o n . M a r k e t a b l e U S g o v e r n m e n t securities ( h e l d m a i n l y b y f o r e i g n c e n t r a l banks) rose i n t h e same p e r i o d f r o m 2-329 b i l l i o n t o m o r e t h a n 7 b i l l i o n d o l l a r s ; n o n - m a r k e t a b l e g o v e r n m e n t securities (bonds a n d notes) increased f r o m 695 m i l l i o n i n 1966 t o 16-012 b i l l i o n i n M a y o f 1973.

I n this paper w e a t t e m p t t o s t u d y t h e significance o f these h o l d i n g s o f U S g o v e r n m e n t securities b y f o r e i g n e r s , a n d t h e i r i n f l u e n c e o n d o m e s t i c m o n e t a r y p o l i c y . T h o u g h such an a c c u m u l a t i o n is i m p o r t a n t f o r t h e balance o f p a y m e n t s , o u r focus w i l l be m a i n l y o n h o w these h o l d i n g s i n f l u e n c e m o n e t a r y p o l i c y i n t h e U n i t e d States.

Foreign-held Debt, Bank Reserves and the Money Supply

I n o r d e r t o b e t t e r u n d e r s t a n d t h e significance o f f o r e i g n - h e l d U S g o v e r n m e n t securities f o r m o n e t a r y p o l i c y w e m a y e x a m i n e h o w purchases a n d sales o f g o v e r n m e n t securities influence b a n k reserves a n d t h e m o n e y s u p p l y .

C o n c e n t r a t i n g first o n f o r e i g n c e n t r a l banks as purchasers o f g o v e r n m e n t s , i f w e assume t h e y purchase, say $100 m i l l i o n i n bills f r o m i n d i v i d u a l s a n d t h e y use deposits i n A m e r i c a n c o m m e r c i a l b a n k s , t o t a l deposits w i l l n o t change n o r w i l l b a n k reserves. $100 m i l l i o n are transferred f r o m t h e accounts o f f o r e i g n c e n t r a l banks t o those o f i n d i v i d u a l s w i t h o u t t h e cash p o s i t i o n o f t h e b a n k i n g system c h a n g i n g . O n t h e o t h e r h a n d , i f t h e y b u y securities f r o m b a n k s , d e m a n d deposits

61

(2)

d e c l i n e ( b y a g a i n $100 m i l l i o n ) w i t h b a n k assets c h a n g i n g i n c o m p o s i t i o n f r o m securities t o cash. I n t h e f i r s t instance m o n e y h e l d b y t h e p u b l i c w i l l increase as t h e y sell securities t o f o r e i g n c e n t r a l b a n k s ; i n t h e second instance, a reshuffling o f assets b e t w e e n t h e banks a n d f o r e i g n c e n t r a l banks o c c u r w i t h d e m a n d deposits o f f o r e i g n c e n t r a l banks d e c l i n i n g b u t t o t a l b a n k reserves r e m a i n i n g t h e same.

A s s u m i n g , o n t h e o t h e r h a n d , t h a t f o r e i g n c e n t r a l banks use deposits h e l d at t h e Federal Reserve system t o b u y securities, t o t a l b a n k reserves w i l l increase w h e t h e r t h e y b u y these securities f r o m banks o r i n d i v i d u a l s . B u y i n g t h e m f r o m i n d i v i d u a l s w o u l d increase t h e p r i v a t e m o n e y s u p p l y d i r e c t l y w h i l e t h e i r purchase f r o m banks w i l l g i v e t h e banks t h e i n c r e m e n t a l reserves t o s u p p o r t a p o t e n t i a l increase i n t h e m o n e y s u p p l y . T h e use o f deposits at t h e C e n t r a l B a n k is, o f course, a n i n j e c t i o n o f h i g h - p o w e r e d m o n e y .

I f t h e Federal Reserve S y s t e m sells U S g o v e r n m e n t s o u t o f t h e i r p o r t f o l i o a n d f o r e i g n c e n t r a l banks are a g a i n purchasers such a transaction w i l l have t h e necessary i m p a c t o f an e q u i v a l e n t o p e n - m a r k e t o p e r a t i o n b y t h e Federal Reserve n a m e l y t o reduce b o t h deposits a n d t o t a l b a n k reserves. T h i s assumes t h a t deposits i n t h e b a n k i n g system are used; w h e n f o r e i g n c e n t r a l banks reduce t h e i r deposits at t h e Federal Reserve i n o r d e r t o purchase these securities, t h e b a n k i n g system w i l l n o t be i n f l u e n c e d d i r e c t l y b y such transactions.

A purchase o f g o v e r n m e n t securities b y f o r e i g n c e n t r a l banks d i r e c t l y f r o m t h e U S T r e a s u r y results i n a r e d u c t i o n o f f o r e i g n - h e l d deposits a n d an increase i n t h e tax a n d l o a n accounts o f t h e T r e a s u r y i n c o m m e r c i a l banks. T o t a l reserves o f t h e b a n k i n g system w i l l n o t c h a n g e ; t h e p r i v a t e l y h e l d m o n e y s u p p l y m a y g o u p , h o w e v e r , as t h e T r e a s u r y u l t i m a t e l y disburses these funds.

C h a n g i n g o u r assumptions t o sales o f U S g o v e r n m e n t securities b y f o r e i g n c e n t r a l banks, i f p r i v a t e i n d i v i d u a l s b u y t h e m , d e m a n d deposits o w n e d b y A m e r i c a n s i n banks w i l l decline as t h e y are transferred t o t h e a c c o u n t of, say, t h e B a n k o f E n g l a n d b u t t h e t o t a l cash p o s i t i o n o f t h e banks w i l l n o t change. W h e r e purchases are m a d e b y t h e banks a n d t h e banks h a v e excess reserves t h e e n d result w i l l b e a n increase i n t o t a l b a n k d e m a n d deposits; an absence o f excess reserves w o u l d e n t a i l n o increase i n d e m a n d deposits as banks reduce, say, t h e i r loans t o purchase securities f r o m f o r e i g n c e n t r a l banks.

A sale o f f o r e i g n - h e l d securities t o t h e Federal Reserve s y s t e m w o u l d increase t o t a l b a n k reserves i f f o r e i g n c e n t r a l banks increase deposits i n t h e banks. A preference o n t h e i r p a r t f o r deposits i n t h e Federal Reserve precludes a n y increase i n t h e l i q u i d i t y o f t h e banks. I f , h o w e v e r , f o r e i g n c e n t r a l banks at some f u t u r e t i m e sell these deposits, a c c u m u l a t e d at t h e Federal Reserve, t o t h e i r nationals f o r t h e purchase o f A m e r i c a n goods a n d services t o t a l b a n k reserves a n d deposits w i l l increase.

(3)

n o change i n t o t a l b a n k reserves a l t h o u g h deposits d o f a l l at least i n i t i a l l y ; i f t h e banks b u y securities a g a i n t h e cash p o s i t i o n o f t h e banks does n o t change a l t h o u g h t h e a m o u n t o f d e m a n d deposits m a y increase i f t h e banks h a v e excess reserves.

A s i n a n y m o d e l , q u a l i f i c a t i o n s m a y b e i n t r o d u c e d . T h o u g h f o r e i g n c e n t r a l banks d o n o t increase t h e t o t a l cash p o s i t i o n o f t h e b a n k i n g s y s t e m b y s e l l i n g securities t o banks o r i n d i v i d u a l s , t h e y m a y change t h e v o l u m e o f excess reserves b y a l t e r i n g t h e c o m p o s i t i o n o f deposits as b e t w e e n d e m a n d a n d t i m e . T h i s f o l l o w s f r o m t h e l o w e r reserve r e q u i r e m e n t a p p l i c a b l e t o t i m e deposits. T h u s a s w i t c h f r o m d e m a n d t o t i m e deposits b y increasing excess reserves also increases t h e p o t e n t i a l f o r an increase i n b a n k c r e d i t a n d m o n e y . A l s o , t h o u g h t h e purchase of, say, treasury bills b y f o r e i g n c e n t r a l banks m a y i n v o l v e n o change i n t h e a v a i l a b i l i t y o f b a n k reserves i t m a y increase t h e y i e l d o n such securities. T h i r d l y , i t is n o t clear t h a t a g i v e n a v a i l a b i l i t y o f l i q u i d i t y i n t h e b a n k i n g s y s t e m is a m a t t e r o f i n d i f f e r e n c e as t o t h e f u n c t i o n i n g o f t h e b a n k i n g system o r t h e r e a c t i o n o f t h e Federal Reserve regardless o f t h e o w n e r s h i p o f such l i q u i d i t y . A n increase i n t h e f o r e i g n o w n e r s h i p o f deposits m a y e l i c i t o n e r e a c t i o n f r o m t h e c e n t r a l b a n k as c o m p a r e d t o a s i t u a t i o n w h e r e deposits are h e l d b y domestics o r m a y e l i c i t q u i t e d i f f e r e n t reactions d e p e n d i n g o n t h e c o n d i t i o n o f t h e balance o f p a y m e n t s .

Implications for Monetary Policy

W h a t e v e r t h e causes o f A m e r i c a n balance o f p a y m e n t s deficits w h i c h l e d t o t h e a c c u m u l a t i o n o f g o v e r n m e n t securities b y f o r e i g n c e n t r a l banks, this s t o c k o f f o r e i g n - h e l d securities has i n f l u e n c e d a n d c e r t a i n l y w i l l c o n t i n u e t o i n f l u e n c e t h e course o f U S m o n e t a r y p o l i c y . T h i s is i n sharp c o n t r a s t t o t h e years w h e n f o r e i g n -h e l d p u b l i c d e b t was a s m a l l percentage o f t -h e t o t a l a n d t -h e m a i n c o n c e r n w a s w i t h t h e b u r d e n o f an e x t e r n a l l y - h e l d d e b t .

I n essence t h e data s h o w an acceleration i n t h e purchases o f treasury bills a n d certificates b y f o r e i g n official i n s t i t u t i o n s i n late 1970 a n d e a r l y 1971. F r o m a p e a k o f 24-7 b i l l i o n i n M a y 1971 official h o l d i n g s o f b i l l s f e l l b y m o r e t h a n 5 b i l l i o n i n t h e n e x t t w o m o n t h s p r e c e d i n g t h e A u g u s t 1971 crisis. D u r i n g A u g u s t , f o r e i g n c e n t r a l banks a g a i n b e g a n t o purchase s h o r t - t e r m treasury securities, w i t h h o l d i n g s g r o w i n g b y a l m o s t e i g h t b i l l i o n d o l l a r s b e t w e e n A u g u s t 1971 a n d M a r c h 1972. T h e t r e n d i n f o r e i g n c e n t r a l b a n k h o l d i n g s o f b i l l s d u r i n g t h e rest o f 1972 w a s d o w n w a r d as t h e y l i q u i d a t e d b i l l s . W i t h t h e i n t e r n a t i o n a l m o n e t a r y crisis o f e a r l y 1973, official h o l d i n g s again rose (cf. c h a r t I ) .

(4)

Billions 4 0 o f

Dollars

C H A R T I

US Treasury Bills and Certificates {payable in dollars) owed to official institutions

(1969-1973)

3 0

2 0

10

J a n . 6 9

J a n . J a n . J a n . 7 0 7 1 7 2

(5)
(6)
(7)

T h e a c c u m u l a t i o n o f U S g o v e r n m e n t d e b t b y f o r e i g n c e n t r a l banks a n d t h e i r activities i n securities m a r k e t s resulted i n a m a r k e d increase i n t h e percentage o f f o r e i g n - h e l d U S p u b l i c d e b t ; this r a t i o rose f r o m 3 p e r c e n t i n 1969 t o 22 p e r cent i n 1 9 7 2 .1 T h e dollars used b y f o r e i g n c e n t r a l b a n k s ( a c q u i r e d as a result o f t h e i r i n t e r v e n t i o n i n f o r e i g n e x c h a n g e m a r k e t s ) h e l p e d finance treasury deficits b y a c q u i r i n g securities d i r e c t l y f r o m t h e U S T r e a s u r y . T h e y also w e r e used t o purchase securities d i r e c t l y f r o m i n d i v i d u a l s ; i n 1971 p r i v a t e i n d i v i d u a l s s o l d s o m e $10 b i l l i o n i n securities t o f o r e i g n c e n t r a l b a n k s .2

T h e i m p a c t o f dealings b y f o r e i g n c e n t r a l banks i n t h e g o v e r n m e n t securities m a r k e t was o b v i o u s l y n o t e d b y t h e Federal Reserve system a n d t h e i m p l i c a t i o n s o f t h e i r a c t i v i t y analysed i n t h e d e l i b e r a t i o n s o f the o p e n - m a r k e t c o m m i t t e e . A t the m e e t i n g o f J u n e 29, 1971 i t was n o t e d t h a t s h o r t - t e r m rates w e r e subject t o pressure f r o m actual o r p o t e n t i a l sales o f f o r e i g n c e n t r a l b a n k s .3 A p p r o x i m a t e l y

o n e m o n t h later, b i l l rates w e r e c i t e d as h a v i n g risen p a r t l y as a result o f sales b y f o r e i g n official a c c o u n t s .4

F o l l o w i n g t h e a n n o u n c e m e n t o f t h e N e w E c o n o m i c P o l i c y o n A u g u s t 15, 1971, the influence o f f o r e i g n c e n t r a l b a n k s c o n t i n u e d t o be f e l t i n t e r m s o f h e l p i n g t o reduce b i l l rates. I n t h e m e e t i n g o f O c t o b e r 19, 1971, i t w a s n o t e d t h a t b i l l rates h a d f a l l e n b y s o m e 70 basis p o i n t s since A u g u s t 15 as a result o f f o r e i g n d e m a n d .5

I n t h e N o v e m b e r 16, 1971 m e e t i n g pressure o n b i l l rates was seen as r e s u l t i n g f r o m the r e d u c e d s u p p l y ( o f bills) traceable t o f o r e i g n purchases.6

Q u i t e l o g i c a l l y t h e Federal Reserve expressed c o n c e r n o v e r f o r e i g n official purchases o f b i l l s , t h e d o w n w a r d pressure o n b i l l rates a n d t h e adverse effect such pressure w o u l d h a v e o n t h e balance o f p a y m e n t s . I n t h e J u n e 1 9 - 2 0 , 1 9 7 2 m e e t i n g i t was d e c i d e d t h a t t h e Federal Reserve i n p r o v i d i n g reserves s h o u l d n o t b u y b i l l s ( w h i c h w o u l d r e d u c e yields) a n d t h a t f o r e i g n d e m a n d f o r bills s h o u l d be m e t f r o m t h e system's p o r t f o l i o .7 T o the e x t e n t t h a t such sales m i g h t h a v e undesirable

effects, reserve needs s h o u l d b e m e t b y o t h e r means. T h e n a t u r e o f these means was n o t spelled o u t .

O t h e r instances can be used t o i l l u s t r a t e the significance o n Federal Reserve t h i n k i n g o f f o r e i g n c e n t r a l b a n k activities i n t h e g o v e r n m e n t securities m a r k e t . I n t h e J u l y 18, 1972 m e e t i n g t h e o p e n - m a r k e t c o m m i t t e e saw b i l l rates n o t r i s i n g

1. International Letter, Federal Reserve B a n k o f Chicago, N o v . 9, 1973.

2. T h o u g h the emphasis o f this study is o n f o r e i g n central bank holdings o f U S governments, there w e r e also private, f o r e i g n purchases (and sales) t h o u g h o n a m u c h smaller scale. D u r i n g 1971, f o r example, sales b y foreigners (other than f o r e i g n official institutions) o f l o n g t e r m securities a m o u n t e d t o 79 m i l l i o n ; d u r i n g 1972 they purchased 21 m i l l i o n i n l o n g - t e r m governments. Foreign banks t y p i c a l l y have n o t h e l d m u c h i n U S Treasury bills; between A p r i l and June 1971 they d i d increase purchases b y some 1*5 b i l l i o n . I n the n e x t several m o n t h s they l i q u i d a t e d p r a c t i ­ cally a l l o f their holdings.

3. Annual Report, B o a r d o f Governors 1971, p . 158.

4. Ibid. p . 164.

5. Annual Report, B o a r d o f Governors 1971, p . 186,

6. Ibid. p . 192.

(8)

as o t h e r rates p a r t l y i n a n t i c i p a t i o n o f f o r e i g n official purchases. T h e y also c o n ­ fessed t o p r o v i d i n g reserves ( i n t h e p r e v i o u s m o n t h ) i n such a w a y as t o m i n i m i s e f u r t h e r declines i n b i l l rates w h i c h w e r e associated w i t h f o r e i g n official purchases.8

T h o u g h t h e o p e n - m a r k e t c o m m i t t e e d i d refer t o f o r e i g n c e n t r a l b a n k a c t i v i t i e s a n d a v a i l a b i l i t y o f b a n k reserves, m o s t emphasis seems t o h a v e been p l a c e d o n t h e d i r e c t i m p a c t o f f o r e i g n purchases o r sales o n interest rates. F o r e i g n purchases w e r e seen as l o w e r i n g y i e l d s , f o r e i g n sales as r a i s i n g y i e l d s . T o t h e e x t e n t t h a t m a i n t e n a n c e o f b i l l rates at a l e v e l c o m p a t i b l e w i t h e x t e r n a l e q u i l i b r i u m w a s a n o b j e c t i v e o f m o n e t a r y p o l i c y d u r i n g 1971 a n d 1972, d o w n w a r d pressure o n b i l l rates e x e r t e d b y f o r e i g n official purchases w o u l d appear t o h a v e r e d u c e d t h e effectiveness o f m o n e t a r y p o l i c y r e l a t i v e t o t h e a t t a i n m e n t o f t h e i r o b j e c t i v e .9

A l o n g t h e same lines, i f official purchases o f m a r k e t a b l e l o n g - t e r m securities d u r i n g 1972 a n d e a r l y 1973 h e l p e d keep l o n g - t e r m interest rates d o w n , t h i s m a y h a v e been i n c o m p a t i b l e w i t h a p p r o p r i a t e c o n t r a c y c l i c a l m o n e t a r y p o l i c y i n t h a t phase o f t h e business c y c l e . T h a t is t o say, since t h e e c o n o m y n o r m a l l y experiences r i s i n g interest rates i n t h e p r o s p e r i t y phase o f t h e c y c l e , r e s t r a i n i n g t h e rise o f l o n g - r a t e s r e d u c e d t h e i r s t a b i l i s i n g effect.

T h e purchases o f l o n g - t e r m securities b y f o r e i g n c e n t r a l banks d u r i n g late 1971 t h r o u g h 1972 a n d i n t o t h e s p r i n g o f 1973 is seen as r e s t r a i n i n g increases i n interest rates at t h e l o n g e n d o f t h e s t r u c t u r e1 0 a n d t o t h a t e x t e n t r e s t r a i n i n g t h e effectiveness

o f m o n e t a r y p o l i c y . T h i s is n o t t o say t h a t t h e Federal Reserve c o u l d n o t h a v e c o n d u c t e d o p e n - m a r k e t o p e r a t i o n s i n b o n d s so as t o p u t u p w a r d pressure o n rates i f t h e y so desired. O n t h e basis o f p o l i c y statements b y C e n t r a l B a n k i n g a u t h o r i t i e s i t appears, h o w e v e r , t h a t t h e y w e l c o m e d a i d i n r e s t r a i n i n g u p w a r d pressure o n l o n g rates w i t h t h e l a t t e r seen as i n t e r f e r i n g w i t h r e c o v e r y f r o m recession. T h u s A r t h u r B u r n s , t e s t i f y i n g b e f o r e t h e J o i n t E c o n o m i c C o m m i t t e e , s a i d :

I also w a n t to b r i n g to y o u r attention a policy statement that w e issued w h i c h is helping t o nudge interest rates d o w n , particularly i n the case o f the more sticky types o f mortgage and consumer loans.1 1

T h i s a t t i t u d e t o w a r d interest rates, o n t h e p a r t o f t h e Federal Reserve is v u l n e r - , able t o c r i t i c i s m . A l m o s t t w o years after t h e t r o u g h o f t h e 1969-70 business c y c l e reached i n t h e t h i r d q u a r t e r o f 1970, l o n g - t e r m rates o n g o v e r n m e n t b o n d s w e r e s o m e 100 basis p o i n t s l o w e r .1 2 F o r e i g n c e n t r a l b a n k s b y p u r c h a s i n g g o v e r n m e n t

b o n d s c o n t r i b u t e d t o t h e m a i n t e n a n c e o f these a r t i f i c i a l l y l o w rates, w h i c h c o u l d 8. Ibid. p p . 158—160.

9. T h e extent t o w h i c h b i l l rates declined m a y be seen i n the rate o n 3 m o n t h bills for January 1970 o f T 13 per cent, as c o m p a r e d t o 4-44 per cent one year later a n d 3-38 per cent i n M a r c h o f 1971.

10. Federal Reserve Bulletin, June 1973, p . 440.

1 1 . 1 9 7 2 Economic Report of the President, Hearings Before the Joint Economic Committee, Feb. 1972, p-

(9)

n o t be j u s t i f i e d o n t h e basis o f experience i n past business c y c l e s1 3 n o r o n t h e basis

o f a n t i - i n f l a t i o n a r y c o n t r a c y c l i c a l m o n e t a r y p o l i c y .

T h e use o f f o r e i g n h e l d f u n d s i n t h e g o v e r n m e n t securities m a r k e t has been seen t o h a v e created p r o b l e m s f o r m o n e t a r y p o l i c y b y causing a p a t t e r n o f rates t h a t d i d n o t c o n t r i b u t e t o t h e efficiency o f m o n e t a r y m a n a g e m e n t . I t m a y b e asked, h o w e v e r , i f t h e existence o f these l a r g e h o l d i n g s o f g o v e r n m e n t securities b y f o r e i g n c e n t r a l banks create o t h e r p o t e n t i a l p r o b l e m s f o r t h e Federal Reserve.

Since t h e Federal Reserve has a t t e m p t e d i n t h e past t o m i n i m i s e i n s t a b i l i t y i n t h e m o n e y m a r k e t , i t w o u l d appear t h a t t h e actions o f f o r e i g n c e n t r a l banks a d d s t i l l a n o t h e r set o f variables t o be r e c k o n e d w i t h b y t h e Federal Reserve. M a n y studies o f C e n t r a l B a n k p o l i c y i n t h e U S emphasise t h a t t h e Federal Reserve c o n d u c t s o p e n - m a r k e t o p e r a t i o n s p r i m a r i l y i n a defensive m a n n e r t o offset those factors t h a t w o u l d t e n d t o p u t pressure o n t h e m o n e y m a r k e t . I n a m o r e c o n c r e t e m a n n e r i f such i t e m s as float, c u r r e n c y i n c i r c u l a t i o n , T r e a s u r y deposits etc, are b e h a v i n g so as t o reduce b a n k reserves t h e Federal Reserve w o u l d b u y g o v e r n m e n t s so as t o s u p p l y reserves t o t h e b a n k i n g s y s t e m .1 4 W i t h f o r e i g n c e n t r a l banks i n

a p o s i t i o n t o , say, sell securities a n d i n effect c o n d u c t o p e n - m a r k e t o p e r a t i o n s o f t h e i r o w n , t h e Federal Reserve m u s t o f necessity take such a c t i o n i n t o a c c o u n t i n d e t e r m i n i n g o v e r a l l reserve a v a i l a b i l i t y . Since a l l o f t h e m a r k e t factors a f f e c t i n g b a n k reserves can o n l y b e estimated w i t h a s i g n i f i c a n t m a r g i n o f e r r o r , t h e activities o f f o r e i g n c e n t r a l banks i n the m o n e y a n d securities m a r k e t v i a b u y i n g o r s e l l i n g securities w o u l d appear t o w i d e n this m a r g i n .1 5

C o n c e i v a b l y t h e task o f t h e Federal Reserve i n r e g u l a t i n g b a n k reserves c o u l d b e m a d e m o r e d i f f i c u l t b y t h e fact t h a t t h e need, say, o f f o r e i g n c e n t r a l b a n k s t o l i q u i d a t e securities m a y n o t c o i n c i d e w i t h t h e needs o f t h e m o n e y m a r k e t f o r l i q u i d i t y . T h e r e is n o , a priori, reason t o suppose t h a t f o r e i g n c e n t r a l b a n k sales o f securities w i l l be consistent w i t h t h e Federal Reserve's p o l i c y o n interest rates o r w i t h t h e desire o f t h e A m e r i c a n C e n t r a l b a n k t o p r o v i d e reserves. A s s u m i n g , l e t us say, t h a t t h e phases o f t h e business c y c l e d o n o t c o i n c i d e as b e t w e e n t h e U S a n d o t h e r e c o n o m i e s t h e n f o r e i g n c e n t r a l banks m a y be selling securities t o h e l p f i n a n c e an e x t e r n a l d e f i c i t at t h e same t i m e t h a t t h e m o n e t a r y a u t h o r i t i e s i n t h e U S are a t t e m p t i n g t o p r e v e n t a rise i n interest rates w h i c h m i g h t a b o r t a r e c o v e r y . I n t e r v e n t i o n i n t h e m a r k e t b y t h e Federal Reserve t o p r e v e n t this rise c o u l d result i n excessive a n d u n d e s i r e d c r e a t i o n o f reserves.

13.111 b o t h the 1954 and 1958 recoveries l o n g - t e r m yields increased. T h u s , one year after the t r o u g h o f A u g u s t 1954, l o n g - t e r m bonds w e r e y i e l d i n g some 47 basis points m o r e . I n A p r i l 1959, the y i e l d o n l o n g - t e r m bonds was 4-01 per cent as c o m p a r e d t o 3-12 per cent one year earlier. A p p r o x i m a t e l y the same relationship h e l d i n the year f o l l o w i n g the February 1961 t r o u g h . Business

Conditions Digest, February, 1973.

14. I n the first h a l f o f 1973 the Federal Reserve b o u g h t some 4*2 b i l l i o n i n bills m a i n l y f r o m f o r e i g n central banks so as t o offset an increase i n treasury balances at the Federal Reserve, w h i c h reduced reserves. Commentary on Credit, S o l o m o n Brothers, J u l y 20, 1973, p . 4.

(10)

H o l d i n g s o f treasury securities b y f o r e i g n c e n t r a l banks m a y create o t h e r p r o b l e m s f o r t h e Federal Reserve. I f f o r e i g n e r s shift h o l d i n g s f r o m l o n g - t e r m t o s h o r t - t e r m issues, this w o u l d i n f l u e n c e d e b t m a n a g e m e n t policies w i t h t h e T r e a s u r y h a v i n g t o c o m e m o r e o f t e n t o t h e m a r k e t f o r f i n a n c i n g . A l s o i t w o u l d influence m o n e t a r y p o l i c y i n t e r m s o f h a v i n g t o m a i n t a i n a p o s t u r e o f e v e n - k e e l m o r e o f t e n . T h i s m a y m e a n a p a t t e r n o f o p e n - m a r k e t o p e r a t i o n s m u c h m o r e defensive i n n a t u r e t h a n w o u l d o t h e r w i s e h a v e been t h e case. T h e Federal Reserve c o u l d h a v e a l l o w e d m a r k e t factors a b s o r b i n g reserves t o h a v e t i g h t e n e d t h e m o n e y m a r k e t ; faced, h o w e v e r , w i t h t h e need t o m a i n t a i n e v e n - k e e l m o r e o f t e n , defensive o p e n - m a r k e t o p e r a t i o n s m i g h t be m o r e aggressive i n offsetting forces r e d u c i n g b a n k reserves.

F o r e i g n o p e r a t i o n s i n t h e l o n g - t e r m sector o f t h e g o v e r n m e n t s e c u r i t i e s ' m a r k e t m a y n o t o n l y , as has a l r e a d y been discussed, alter t h e p a t t e r n o f interest rates b u t m a y also f o r c e a change i n t h e modus operandi o f o p e n - m a r k e t o p e r a t i o n s r e l a t i v e t o t h e m a r k e t s i n w h i c h securities are b o u g h t a n d s o l d . T h o u g h t h e Federal Reserve concentrates o p e n - m a r k e t o p e r a t i o n s p r e d o m i n a n t l y i n t h e b i l l m a r k e t (bills o n l y has l o n g been a b a n d o n e d ) a d i s t o r t i o n o f t h e s t r u c t u r e o f rates b y f o r e i g n purchases o f l o n g - t e r m securities m i g h t i n d u c e t h e Federal Reserve t o alter t h e i r o p e r a t i o n s i n f a v o u r o f t h e l o n g - t e r m p a r t o f t h e m a r k e t . I t is n o t clear, h o w e v e r , t h a t increased a c t i v i t y b y t h e Federal Reserve i n t h e m a r k e t f o r l o n g - t e r m securities w o u l d c o n t r i b u t e t o t h e p r o p e r f u n c t i o n i n g a n d efficiency o f t h e m a r k e t f o r g o v e r n m e n t securities.

T h e increased i m p o r t a n c e o f f o r e i g n c e n t r a l banks i n t h e g o v e r n m e n t securities m a r k e t s m a y also create t e c h n i c a l p r o b l e m s f o r t h e Federal Reserve i n m o n e t a r y m a n a g e m e n t . Since o p e n - m a r k e t o p e r a t i o n s are t h e m o s t i m p o r t a n t t o o l o f p o l i c y , b o t h t h e size a n d c o m p o s i t i o n o f t h e Federal Reserve's p o r t f o l i o o f securities are i m p o r t a n t . I f f o r e i g n c e n t r a l banks decide t o sell securities, t h e Federal Reserve faces n o c o n s t r a i n t i n b e i n g able t o b u y t h e m .1 6 T h e a b i l i t y o f t h e

C e n t r a l B a n k t o b u y g o v e r n m e n t securities as a means o f i n j e c t i n g reserves i n t o t h e b a n k i n g system is c o n s t r a i n e d , h o w e v e r , i f f o r e i g n purchases have d e p l e t e d t h e i n v e n t o r i e s o f dealers. T h e r e is s o m e evidence t h a t this has i n d e e d h a p p e n e d .1 7

T h o u g h s o m e o f t h e p r o b l e m s associated w i t h f o r e i g n h o l d i n g s o f g o v e r n m e n t securities h a v e been discussed i t is n o t clear t h a t t h e i r m a n a g e m e n t a l w a y s frustrates m o n e t a r y p o l i c y . T o t h e e x t e n t t h a t f o r e i g n i n v e s t m e n t d u r i n g 1972 o f $4*3 b i l l i o n i n m a r k e t a b l e a n d $3-8 b i l l i o n i n n o n - m a r k e t a b l e issues h e l p e d m e e t i n g m o r e t h a n h a l f o f t h e T r e a s u r y ' s b o r r o w i n g1 8 needs, i t m i g h t h a v e

(11)

t h e C e n t r a l B a n k w i t h t h e l a t t e r situations i n v o l v i n g t h e m o n e t i s a t i o n o f such d e b t . T h i s , o f course, neglects t h e interest-rate aspects o f these purchases b y f o r e i g n c e n t r a l banks w h i c h m a y i n d u c e a p a t t e r n o f rates unacceptable t o t h e m o n e t a r y a u t h o r i t i e s .1 9

T h e existence o f such a l a r g e s t o c k o f g o v e r n m e n t securities h e l d b y f o r e i g n -c e n t r a l banks has o t h e r i n t e r e s t i n g aspe-cts f o r m o n e t a r y p o l i -c y . W o u l d t h e p r o b l e m s f o r m o n e t a r y p o l i c y be a n y different i f t h e d o l l a r s earned t h r o u g h o u r balance o f p a y m e n t s deficits h a d been i n v e s t e d i n t h e stock o r c o r p o r a t e b o n d m a r k e t ; Since o n l y a s m a l l p a r t d i d g o i n t o these m a r k e t s , w e can o n l y speculate o n w h a t t h e Fed's r o l e w o u l d b e .2 0 A massive i n f l o w o f these funds i n t o , say, t h e

c o r p o r a t e b o n d m a r k e t w o u l d h a v e h a d t h e i m m e d i a t e i m p a c t o f r e d u c i n g y i e l d s a n d c o n c e i v a b l y a m o r e d i r e c t f a v o u r a b l e i n f l u e n c e o n d o m e s t i c i n v e s t m e n t , w h i c h at least i n 1972 w o u l d h a v e served t o frustrate m o n e t a r y p o l i c y b y n o t e x e r t i n g t h e r e s t r a i n i n g i n f l u e n c e o f h i g h e r interest rates. I f , o n t h e o t h e r h a n d , securities i n the hands o f f o r e i g n e r s are v i e w e d as a p o t e n t i a l source o f i n s t a b i l i t y f o r m o n e y a n d c a p i t a l m a r k e t s , w o u l d t h e p o t e n t i a l i n s t a b i l i t y be lessened i f f o r e i g n c e n t r a l banks h a d b o u g h t c o r p o r a t e r a t h e r t h a n g o v e r n m e n t bonds? A s s u m i n g t h a t f o r e i g n officials w o u l d b r i n g o f f a mass l i q u i d a t i o n , i t is d i f f i c u l t t o see t h e Federal Reserve a b a n d o n i n g t h e m a r k e t a n d a l l o w i n g a f i n a n c i a l p a n i c t o d e v e l o p . G r a n t e d t h a t f o r e i g n c e n t r a l banks c o u l d l i q u i d a t e d e b t , w h e t h e r p r i v a t e o r g o v e r n m e n t a l , t h e r o l e o f t h e C e n t r a l B a n k i n assuring t h e l i q u i d i t y o f t h e b a n k i n g s y s t e m w o u l d n o t appear t o be a n y different. I n d e e d , t h e p o t e n t i a l i n s t a b i l i t y o f g o v e r n m e n t d e b t exists e v e n i f A m e r i c a n s h o l d t h e d e b t , w i t h t h e r o l e o f t h e Federal Reserve as a l e n d e r o f last resort c l e a r l y delineated i n some p e r i o d o f crisis.

I f w e can assume t h a t m o n e t a r y p o l i c y has e v e n a m i n i m a l effect o n t h e w i l l i n g n e s s o f investors t o h o l d o n t o securities b y w a y o f its i m p a c t o n c a p i t a l values can w e also assume t h a t f o r e i g n c e n t r a l banks w i l l be i n f l u e n c e d a n d i n t h e desired d i r e c t i o n ? M o r e specifically a n d w i t h o u t a t t e m p t i n g t o resurrect t h e A v a i l a b i l i t y D o c t r i n e , i f c a p i t a l losses deter p r i v a t e investors f r o m selling g o v e r n ­ m e n t securities w i l l i t h a v e t h e same effect o n f o r e i g n c e n t r a l banks w h o are n o t as p r o f i t - o r i e n t e d ? I f n o t , t h e n some o f t h e effectiveness o f m o n e t a r y p o l i c y t h o u g h m a r g i n a l , m a y be lost.

G i v e n t h e parameters o f t h e s i t u a t i o n w i t h a h u g e balance o f p a y m e n t s d e f i c i t a n d its c o u n t e r p a r t t h e a c c u m u l a t i o n i n t h e f o r m o f g o v e r n m e n t securities, f o r e i g n c e n t r a l banks m i g h t h a v e r e d u c e d t h e p r o b l e m s o f m o n e t a r y m a n a g e m e n t b y

19. T h e Treasury indicates that the overhang o f f o r e i g n - h e l d securities influenced the t i m i n g o f its b o r r o w i n g i n 1972. T o reassure the m a r k e t against any sudden d e m a n d f o r cash i f f o r e i g n central banks l i q u i d a t e d securities, the Treasury advanced its o w n cash b o r r o w i n g i n t o December (rather t h a n N o v e m b e r 1972). 1972 Report of the Secretary of the Treasury, p . 23.

20. N e t purchases o f U S corporate stock b y foreigners a m o u n t e d t o b u t 1-672 b i l l i o n i n 1971 and 3-316 b i l l i o n i n 1972; f o r corporate bonds the figures w e r e -68 b i l l i o n i n 1971 and 1-824 b i l l i o n i n 1972. These w e r e o b v i o u s l y b u t a fraction o f the purchases o f governments. Federal Reserve

(12)

a l t e r i n g the p a t t e r n o f t h e i r purchases. Purchases o f T r e a s u r y b o n d s i n 1971 ( i n c o n t r a s t t o t h e substantial i n v e s t m e n t i n bills) w o u l d h a v e r e d u c e d d o w n w a r d pressure o n b i l l rates w i t h its c o n c o m i t a n t destabilising influence o n t h e B a l a n c e o f P a y m e n t s . O n t h e o t h e r h a n d , h e a v y purchases o f bills (rather t h a n b o n d s ) d u r i n g 1972 a n d e a r l y 1973, m e e t i n g w i t h t h e pressure o f e x p a n d i n g e c o n o m i c a c t i v i t y , m i g h t n o t h a v e c o n t r i b u t e d as m u c h t o r e d u c i n g b i l l rates a n d also, n o t i n t e r f e r i n g w i t h t h e stabilising i n f l u e n c e o f r i s i n g l o n g - t e r m interest rates i n t h e p r o s p e r i t y phase o f t h e business c y c l e . W h e t h e r t h e p a t t e r n o f purchases o p t i m a l f r o m t h e v i e w p o i n t o f effective m o n e t a r y p o l i c y w o u l d be consistent w i t h t h e needs o f f o r e i g n official i n s t i t u t i o n s is a m o o t q u e s t i o n .

T h e assurances o f t h e Federal Reserve t h a t f o r e i g n c e n t r a l b a n k h o l d i n g s o f U S g o v e r n m e n t s pose m e r e t r a n s i t o r y p r o b l e m s2 1 i n t e r m s o f t h e m o n e y m a r k e t ,

are n o t b o r n e o u t b y t h e realities o f t h e s i t u a t i o n . F o r o n e , t h e y h a v e a d m i t t e d t h a t f o r e i g n purchases h a v e caused d i s t o r t i o n s i n t h e p a t t e r n o f interest rates especially i n t h e l i g h t o f t h e preference d i s p l a y e d b y f o r e i g n c e n t r a l banks f o r bills. T h i s d i s t o r t i o n has i m p l i c a t i o n s n o t o n l y f o r t h e balance o f p a y m e n t s b u t also f o r t h e attractiveness o f savings a n d l o n g - t e r m i n v e s t m e n t . T h u s , t h e w i d e d i f f e r e n t i a l b e t w e e n s h o r t a n d l o n g rates i n 1971 has been c i t e d as i n c r e a s i n g t h e attractiveness o f t i m e a n d savings accounts, i n t u r n i n f l u e n c i n g s p e n d i n g o n c o n s t r u c t i o n .2 2

S e c o n d l y , t h e r e is a m p l e evidence t h a t t h e Federal Reserve has been i n f l u e n c e d b y t h e actions o f f o r e i g n c e n t r a l banks. Instances h a v e a l r e a d y been g i v e n o f p o l i c y decisions m a d e b y t h e F e d as a n offset t o t h e activities o f f o r e i g n c e n t r a l banks. These i n c l u d e t h e s u p p l y i n g o f reserves b y means o t h e r t h a n t h e purchase o f b i l l s , a n d t h e c o n t r a c t i n g o f repurchase agreements as a means o f s u p p l y i n g reserves t e m p o r a r i l y so as t o be able t o purchase securities f r o m f o r e i g n c e n t r a l banks i n t h e w a k e o f t h e a n t i c i p a t e d r e f l o w o f funds f o l l o w i n g t h e S m i t h s o n i a n a g r e e m e n t .2 3 T h u s . i t does n o t appear reasonable t o v i e w f o r e i g n c e n t r a l b a n k

h o l d i n g s o f U S g o v e r n m e n t securities as a m e r e t r a n s i t o r y p r o b l e m . T h e v e r y a c t i v i t i e s o f t h e Federal Reserve are at v a r i a n c e w i t h this v i e w .

F o r e i g n h o l d i n g s o f U S g o v e r n m e n t securities h a v e been treated as t o t h e i r i m p a c t o n m o n e t a r y p o l i c y . I t is clear, h o w e v e r , t h a t t h e y present p r o b l e m s f o r b o t h d e b t m a n a g e m e n t a n d t h e r e f o r m o f t h e i n t e r n a t i o n a l m o n e t a r y system. F o r d e b t m a n a g e m e n t since so m u c h is i n t h e f o r m o f l i q u i d s h o r t - t e r m securities; f o r i n t e r n a t i o n a l m o n e t a r y r e f o r m since a decrease i n t h e d e m a n d f o r U S g o v e r n ­ m e n t securities m a y c o i n c i d e w i t h a decrease i n t h e d e m a n d f o r d o l l a r s . I f w e can assume t h a t f o r e i g n c e n t r a l banks are responsible e n o u g h t o a v o i d a mass l i q u i d a ­ t i o n o f U S g o v e r n m e n t securities, t h e task o f b o t h t h e Federal Reserve a n d t h e T r e a s u r y w o u l d be eased i n d i r e c t p r o p o r t i o n t o t h e m o v e m e n t o f f o r e i g n h o l d i n g s i n t o l o n g e r - t e r m a n d b e t t e r y e t i n t o n o n - m a r k e t a b l e securities. A subsidy t o f o r e i g n c e n t r a l banks, e i t h e r i n t h e f o r m o f r e d u c e d taxes o n interest i n c o m e

2 1 . 1 9 7 3 Economic Report of the President, Hearings on the Economic Report, p . 4 3 1 . 22. Annual Report, B o a r d o f G o v e r n o r s 1971, p . 44.

(13)

o r perhaps h i g h e r interest r a t e s ,2 4 c o u l d b e j u s t i f i e d i f i t c o n t r i b u t e d t o t h e i m ­

m o b i l i s a t i o n o f such funds. T h i s assumes, o f course, t h a t f o r e i g n c e n t r a l banks see i t as b e i n g i n t h e i r o w n self-interest t o reduce t h e l i q u i d i t y o f t h e i r h o l d i n g s .

E v e n i f such a f r e e z i n g o f f o r e i g n h o l d i n g s o f g o v e r n m e n t s w e r e n o t feasible, t h e task o f m o n e t a r y p o l i c y does n o t seem t o be i n s u r m o u n t a b l e . I t is h a r d l y l i k e l y t h a t t h e A m e r i c a n balance o f p a y m e n t s w i l l s h o w surpluses o f t h e same o r d e r as t h e deficits t h a t l e d t o t h e a c c u m u l a t i o n . A s t h e d o l l a r does s t r e n g t h e n i n w o r l d m a r k e t s , f o r e i g n c e n t r a l banks w i l l be e x p e c t e d t o l i q u i d a t e s o m e o f t h e i r s e c u r i t y h o l d i n g s .2 5 T o t h e e x t e n t t h a t b o t h t h e s t r e n g t h e n i n g a n d l i q u i d a t i o n

are o r d e r l y , t h e y n e e d present n o great p r o b l e m s t o t h e Federal Reserve.

Patterns of Security Holdings among Nations

T h e o v e r a l l a c c u m u l a t i o n o f s e c u r i t y h o l d i n g s b y f o r e i g n c e n t r a l banks hides s i g n i f i c a n t differences a m o n g t h e m i n t h e patterns o f securities h e l d . T h e G e r m a n s h a v e d i s p l a y e d a preference f o r U S T r e a s u r y bills a n d l o n g e r - t e r m n o n - m a r k e t a b l e b o n d s ; t h e i r h o l d i n g s o f m a r k e t a b l e notes a n d b o n d s h a v e been s m a l l . B e t w e e n J a n u a r y o f 1970 a n d 1971 official G e r m a n h o l d i n g s o f treasury bills j u m p e d f r o m 983 m i l l i o n t o 6*869 b i l l i o n ; t h e y h e l d b u t o n e m i l l i o n d o l l a r s i n m a r k e t a b l e b o n d s . D u r i n g t h e first five m o n t h s o f 1971, h o l d i n g s o f bills increased t o 11*585 b i l l i o n ; f r o m t h a t t i m e , h o w e v e r , t h e y l i q u i d a t e d treasury b i l l s as m a y be seen f r o m t h e i r h o l d i n g s o f b u t 4-4 b i l l i o n i n J a n u a r y 1973. W i t h t h e i n f l o w o f d o l l a r s i n t o G e r m a n y d u r i n g t h e w i n t e r o f 1973, t h e D e u t s c h e - B u n d e s b a n k a c c u m u l a t e d s o m e 7-6 b i l l i o n i n bills i n M a r c h a n d A p r i l o f 1973. T h o u g h G e r m a n h o l d i n g s o f bills w e r e d e c l i n i n g t h r o u g h late 1971 a n d d u r i n g 1972, t h e y d i d increase purchases o f special treasury issues o f n o n - m a r k e t a b l e notes a n d b o n d s ; these b o n d s d e n o m i n ­ ated i n dollars j u m p e d f r o m 3-0 b i l l i o n i n M a y o f 1971 t o w e l l o v e r $11 b i l l i o n b y t h e e n d o f 1972. T h e G e r m a n s h a d h e l d n o n - m a r k e t a b l e treasury issues d e n o m i n a t e d i n D - M a r k s t h r o u g h t h e 1960s; at n o t i m e , h o w e v e r , d i d t h e i r h o l d i n g s exceed o n e b i l l i o n d o l l a r s (cf. T a b l e 4).

O f f i c i a l Japanese h o l d i n g s o f treasury bills have also d i s p l a y e d a r i s i n g t r e n d , s i m i l a r t o t h a t o f t h e G e r m a n s , w i t h t h e difference t h a t t h e Japanese d i d n o t l i q u i d a t e bills d u r i n g t h e second h a l f o f 1971 a n d i n t o 1972 as d i d t h e G e r m a n s . T h e i r h o l d i n g s o f b i l l s increased b y s o m e 9-2 b i l l i o n i n 1971. B y t h e e n d o f 1972 there w a s l i t t l e change. D u r i n g the crisis o f e a r l y 1973, h o w e v e r , t h e Japanese d i d sell s o m e 3-8 b i l l i o n o f treasury b i l l s . I n c o n t r a s t t o t h e G e r m a n s , t h e Japanese purchased a l a r g e a m o u n t o f m a r k e t a b l e b o n d s a n d notes; t h e i r h o l d i n g s rose f r o m b u t 61 m i l l i o n i n J a n u a r y 1971 t o 2'0 b i l l i o n i n J a n u a r y 1972 a n d 4*8 b i l l i o n a y e a r later.

24. Senator P r o x m i r e , c h a i r m a n o f the J o i n t E c o n o m i c C o m m i t t e e , has i n q u i r e d as t o the possi­ b i l i t y o f a m o r a t o r i u m o n taxes payable b y f o r e i g n central banks o n their holdings o f governments.

1973 Economic Report of the President, Hearings Before the Joint Economic Committee, p . 423.

(14)

O f t h e m a j o r i n d u s t r i a l n a t i o n s , C a n a d a i n v e s t e d m o r e o n a p r o p o r t i o n a t e basis o f its d o l l a r h o l d i n g s i n n o n - m a r k e t a b l e U S g o v e r n m e n t notes a n d b o n d s . I t increased its h o l d i n g s o f treasury bills d u r i n g 1971 a n d 1972 t h e n l i q u i d a t i n g s o m e $300 m i l l i o n i n late 1972 a n d e a r l y 1973. H o l d i n g s o f m a r k e t a b l e notes a n d b o n d s w e r e also r e d u c e d b y some 100 m i l l i o n d u r i n g 1970 a n d 1971 b u t t h e n rose r a p i d l y i n t h e l a t t e r m o n t h s o f 1972 a n d early 1973. T h e i m p o r t a n c e o f n o n - m a r k e t a b l e securities ( d e n o m i n a t e d i n dollars) m a y be seen i n t h e s o m e 2*6 b i l l i o n h e l d i n 1971 a n d 2-8 b i l l i o n h e l d i n 1972. T h i s w a s greater t h a n t h e i r c o m b i n e d t o t a l o f m a r k e t ­ able issues o f b i l l s , notes a n d b o n d s .

T h e b e h a v i o u r o f t h e U n i t e d K i n g d o m i n t h e m a n a g e m e n t o f U S g o v e r n m e n t securities reflected t h e g r o w t h a n d t h e n decline i n t h e i r official reserves a n d also a m a r k e d preference f o r treasury b i l l s . T h e B r i t i s h official h o l d i n g s o f treasury b i l l s increased t h r o u g h 1971 t i l l A u g u s t o f t h a t year. A f t e r l i q u i d a t i n g s o m e 500 m i l l i o n b e t w e e n A u g u s t a n d S e p t e m b e r 1971, t h e y a g a i n b e g a n b u y i n g bills i n N o v e m b e r w i t h t h e i r h o l d i n g s i n c r e a s i n g t o 6-3 b i l l i o n b y M a r c h 1972. Since t h a t peak, h o w e v e r , official h o l d i n g s d e c l i n e d some 3-0 b i l l i o n b y t h e e n d o f 1972. T h o u g h t h e U n i t e d K i n g d o m d i d b u y 300 m i l l i o n i n b i l l s d u r i n g t h e crisis o f early 1973, t h e i r h o l d i n g s w e r e s t i l l w e l l b e l o w those o f a y e a r earlier. T h e l i q u i d a t i o n o f bills d u r i n g 1972 w a s r e l a t e d t o t h e balance o f p a y m e n t s difficulties o f t h e U n i t e d K i n g d o m d u r i n g this p e r i o d . A s t o h o l d i n g s o f o t h e r securities t h e

T A B L E I : Holdings of Treasury bills by country, 1969-73, at three-month intervals (in millions of dollars)

Germany Japan Canada France UK Italy Switzerland

1969 June 1,166 970 55 72 156 326 37

Sept. 3 » i1 2 1,058 27 116 1 339 180

D e c . 189 1,234 233 99 59 178 234

1970 M a r c h 1,635 1,456 336 232 251 102 191

June 2,825 1,272 229 439 58 325 296

Sept. 4.945 998 350 727 459 367 337

Dec. 6,938 1,676 ' 479 856 170 436 421

1971 M a r c h 8,348 2,757 623 1,202 1,210 i , i 9 5 289

June 6,239 4,743 648 1,662 4,092 1,107 593

Sept. 4.480 9,989 988 2,471 4,555 1,608 2,094

D e c . 5,777 10,548 1,153 2,462 6,295 1,232 2,003 1972 M a r c h 7 . I 4 I 11,095 1,017 2,412 6,373 916 1,824

June 5.991 9,76o 1,325 2,880 5,578 379 1,402

Sept. 5,278 9,620 1,192 3,872 3,397 824 2,237

D e c . 4.735 10,099 855 3,845 2,948 533 1,529

(15)

T A B L E 2: Holdings of marketable bonds and notes by country, 1969-73, at three-month intervals (in millions of dollars)

Germany Japan Canada France C7iC Italy Switzerlam

1969 June

10 389 6 368

44 Sept.

10 389 6 406

45 Dec.

61 272 6 407

42 1970 M a r c h

62 271 6 350

46

June

61 286 6 396

45 Sept.

61. 284 6 423

49 Dec.

61 192 6 499

49 1971 M a r c h

61 188 7 537

48 June 3 142 174 2 490

29 Sept. 3 755 175 2 432

29 Dec. 3 I . 7 I 7 181 2 323

60 1972 M a r c h 3 2,391 178 2 268

53

June 3 2,901 313 2 264

53 Sept. 3 3 . 4 8 i 432 2 293

45 Dec. 3 4.38o 558 2 327

45 1973 M a r c h 3 5,421 559 2 276

44

Source: T r e a s u r y Bulletins.

T A B L E 3: Non-marketable US Treasury bonds and notes issued to official institutions, 1969-73, at three-month intervals

In Dollars {Millions) In Foreign Currencies (Millions)

Germany Canada Italy Germany Italy Switzerland

1969 June

1,084 140 1,200 226 5 4 i Sept.

1,084 139 1,200 125 5 4 i Dec.

1,129 135 1,200 125 5 4 i 1970 M a r c h

1,429 121 542

5 4 i

June

2,229 32 542

541

Sept.

2,289 29 542

541 Dec.

2,289 25 542

541 1971 M a r c h

2,289 25 542

541

June 3,000 2,289 25 542

569

(16)

U n i t e d K i n g d o m h e l d n o n o n - m a r k e t a b l e securities; h o l d i n g s o f s o m e 546 m i l l i o n i n m a r k e t a b l e s i n J a n u a r y 1971 (270 m i l l i o n b y J a n u a r y 1972) w e r e a s m a l l percentage o f t h e i r h o l d i n g s .

A m o n g o t h e r i n d u s t r i a l n a t i o n s c e r t a i n patterns o f i n v e s t m e n t b y f o r e i g n c e n t r a l banks m a y b e n o t e d . France's interest i n U S g o v e r n m e n t securities has been m a n i f e s t e d a l m o s t c o m p l e t e l y i n t e r m s o f bills. T h e i r i n v e s t m e n t i n b i l l s g r e w f r o m 994 m i l l i o n d o l l a r s i n J a n u a r y 1971 t o 3-3 b i l l i o n i n A u g u s t o f t h a t year. T h e y d i d l i q u i d a t e s o m e 1-3 b i l l i o n i n t h e n e x t t w o m o n t h s , b u t r e s u m e d b u y i n g b i l l s t o w a r d t h e e n d o f 1971. H o l d i n g s increased d u r i n g a l l o f 1972 a n d e a r l y 1973 as official reserves g r e w . France's h o l d i n g s o f m a r k e t a b l e notes a n d b o n d s w e r e a m i n i m a l 2 m i l l i o n d o l l a r s i n 1972; t h e y h e l d n o n o n - m a r k e t a b l e b o n d s .

I t a l y ' s official h o l d i n g s o f treasury bills g r e w d u r i n g 1971 r e a c h i n g a peak o f 1-608 b i l l i o n i n S e p t e m b e r 1971. Since t h e n h o l d i n g s o f b i l l s have d i s p l a y e d a n e g a t i v e t r e n d . T h e y h a v e s h o w n n o interest i n m a r k e t a b l e l o n g - t e r m U S g o v e r n m e n t securities. T h o u g h official h o l d i n g s o f n o n - m a r k e t a b l e b o n d s a n d notes ( d e n o m i n a t e d i n dollars) a m o u n t e d t o o v e r 100 m i l l i o n dollars i n 1969, t h e m a j o r p a r t w a s l i q u i d a t e d b y 1972. A l l o f t h e 125 m i l l i o n i n n o n - m a r k e t a b l e s ( d e n o m i n a t e d i n l i r e ) w e r e l i q u i d a t e d since 1 9 7 0 .2 6

S w i t z e r l a n d d i d purchase substantial a m o u n t s o f treasury bills d u r i n g 1971. I n d e e d t h e i r h o l d i n g s o f b i l l s j u m p e d b y s o m e 1-5 b i l l i o n b e t w e e n J u l y a n d A u g u s t 1971. O v e r t h e n e x t year t h e y t h e n s o l d a b i l l i o n d o l l a r s i n these s h o r t - t e r m securities. T h o u g h t h e y purchased 1*05 b i l l i o n dollars i n bills b e t w e e n J u n e a n d J u l y 1972, t h e i r h o l d i n g s d e c l i n e d d u r i n g t h e rest o f 1972 a n d i n t o e a r l y 1973. A s t o l o n g e r - t e r m securities, Swiss official h o l d i n g s o f m a r k e t a b l e notes a n d b o n d s w e r e v e r y s m a l l . T h e y h e l d , h o w e v e r , 1*2 b i l l i o n i n n o n - m a r k e t a b l e s d u r i n g 1971 a n d 1972. These w e r e d e n o m i n a t e d i n Swiss Francs.

These diverse patterns o f i n v e s t m e n t o f d o l l a r s i n U S g o v e r n m e n t securities m a y be analysed i n t e r m s o f several d i f f e r e n t factors. T h e purchase o f treasury b i l l s o n such a l a r g e scale i n 1971 c a n n o t b e j u s t i f i e d b y interest rate differentials n o r b y t h e desire t o m a x i m i s e interest i n c o m e since b i l l rates d u r i n g a l l o f 1971 w e r e w e l l b e l o w those o n U S g o v e r n m e n t l o n g - t e r m securities. C o n v e r s e l y , t h e a c c u m u l a t i o n o f b o n d s d u r i n g 1972 appears l o g i c a l i f earnings w e r e t h e o v e r ­ r i d i n g c o n s i d e r a t i o n as t h e p o s i t i v e l y s l o p e d p a t t e r n o f yields persisted d u r i n g 1972. S e c o n d l y , t h e o b v i o u s preference f o r treasury bills reflects t h e l i q u i d i t y advantages o f these securities, w h i c h w a s o b t a i n e d at a s i g n i f i c a n t cost i n f o r e g o n e i n c o m e d u r i n g these years. A t h i r d c o n s i d e r a t i o n w o u l d be t h e state o f t h e Balance o f P a y m e n t s o f t h e respective c o u n t r i e s . G r e a t B r i t a i n , f o r e x a m p l e , a c c u m u l a t e d treasury b i l l s d u r i n g 1971 b u t t h e n l i q u i d a t e d a s i g n i f i c a n t p o r t i o n as i t i n c u r r e d an e x t e r n a l d e f i c i t d u r i n g 1972. I t a l y f o l l o w e d a s i m i l a r p a t t e r n o f i n v e s t m e n t a n d l i q u i d a t i o n .

Besides interest rate differentials, l i q u i d i t y a n d balance o f p a y m e n t s considera­ t i o n s , t w o o t h e r factors appear r e l e v a n t i n e x p l a i n i n g differences a m o n g n a t i o n s

(17)

i n s e c u r i t y h o l d i n g s , the desire t o c o - o p e r a t e w i t h A m e r i c a n m o n e t a r y a u t h o r i t i e s2 7

a n d the desire t o p r o t e c t t h e i r assets against t h e loss associated w i t h d e v a l u a t i o n . T h e purchase o f sizeable a m o u n t s o f l o n g - t e r m n o n - m a r k e t a b l e b o n d s b y b o t h t h e G e r m a n s a n d Canadians reflects a s p i r i t o f c o - o p e r a t i o n o n t h e i r p a r t , easing t h e task o f b o t h t h e T r e a s u r y a n d o f t h e Federal Reserve b y a c c e p t i n g assets w i t h less l i q u i d i t y . T h e G e r m a n s a n d Swiss, also, purchased l o n g - t e r m n o n - m a r k e t a b l e securities d e n o m i n a t e d i n t h e i r o w n currencies m o t i v a t e d n o d o u b t b y a desire t o p r o t e c t themselves against losses associated w i t h possible d e v a l u a t i o n o f t h e d o l l a r .

A s s u m i n g t h a t f o r e i g n c e n t r a l banks a t t e m p t t o m a x i m i s e u t i l i t y i n t h e i r h o l d i n g s o f treasury securities, w e m a y t h i n k o f t h e m as e q u a t i n g desired t o actual h o l d i n g s . Since U S T r e a s u r y b i l l s w e r e purchased b y a l l o f the c o u n t r i e s s t u d i e d (whereas some d i d n o t purchase m a r k e t a b l e a n d others n o n - m a r k e t a b l e ) w e w i l l a t t e m p t t o relate desired h o l d i n g s o f bills t o actual h o l d i n g s . D e s i r e d h o l d i n g s o f treasury bills are v i e w e d as b e i n g f u n c t i o n a l l y related t o ( i ) b i l l rates (Rt), w h i c h

reflect o p p o r t u n i t y costs o f i n v e s t i n g i n treasury b i l l s , (2) t h e rates o f i n f l a t i o n measured b y t h e c o n s u m e r p r i c e i n d e x (Pt) as a p r o x y r e f l e c t i n g expectations as

t o t h e general state o f t h e U S e c o n o m y , a n d (3) h o l d i n g s o f t o t a l official reserves ( O , ) as a c o n s t r a i n t o n t h e i r d e m a n d f o r bills. T h u s , desired treasury b i l l h o l d i n g s (by f o r e i g n c e n t r a l banks) are a f u n c t i o n o f b i l l rates, prices a n d official reserves. I f desired are e q u a l t o actual h o l d i n g s , (Bt) t h e n i n e q u i l i b r i u m .

Bt=f(R„P„Ot)

Regressing h o l d i n g s o f b i l l s ( f o r each o f t h e seven countries) o n each o f these three variables, u s i n g m o n t h l y data f o r t h e p e r i o d 1969 t h r o u g h M a r c h 1973 y i e l d e d t h e f o l l o w i n g results. T h e v a r i a b l e m o s t o f t e n r e l a t e d i n a statistically s i g n i f i c a n t m a n n e r t o treasury b i l l h o l d i n g s , is official h o l d i n g s o f reserves. T h e t w o o t h e r variables e x p l a i n e d l i t t l e o f t h e v a r i a t i o n i n f o r e i g n official h o l d i n g s o f b i l l s .

U s i n g first differences o f t h e data, t h e f o l l o w i n g results w e r e o b t a i n e d . F o r G e r m a n y a l m o s t 72 p e r cent o f the v a r i a t i o n i n b i l l s c o u l d be e x p l a i n e d b y changes i n official reserves, w i t h t h e coefficient o f t h e official reserve v a r i a b l e a p p r o x i m a t e l y

0-9. F o r Japan a h i g h e r J R2 was o b t a i n e d (-898) w i t h t h e official reserves v a r i a b l e

statistically s i g n i f i c a n t a n d a p p r o x i m a t i n g o n e .2 8 F o r each o f t h e o t h e r five c o u n t r i e s

t h e R2's w e r e d i s t i n c t l y l o w e r b u t a g a i n t h e official reserves v a r i a b l e w a s statistically

s i g n i f i c a n t a n d l i k e G e r m a n y a n d Japan h a v i n g a p o s i t i v e coefficient i n d i c a t i n g t h a t increases i n reserves w e r e associated w i t h increases i n b i l l h o l d i n g s . E q u a t i o n s f o r each c o u n t r y are g i v e n i n T a b l e 1.

27. T h e G e r m a n C e n t r a l B a n k rationalised its investment policies as n o t c o n t r i b u t i n g t o an increase i n international l i q u i d i t y . Report of the Deutsche Bundesbank, 1971, p . 105. T h e B a n k o f I t a l y sees the purchase o f some 9 b i l l i o n dollars i n m e d i u m a n d l o n g - t e r m securities b y f o r e i g n central banks as r e d u c i n g i n t e r n a t i o n a l l i q u i d i t y . Annual Report, B a n k o f I t a l y 1972, p . 3 1 .

28. W h e n using l o g a r i t h m i c differences, the coefficients f o r the official reserves variable was significant f o r f o u r o f the seven countries, G e r m a n y , Japan, I t a l y and France, w i t h coefficients, respectively, o f 3-64, vS6, 3-63 and 1*94. Thus, the d e m a n d f o r bills f o r each o f t h e m appears t o be elastic.

(18)

T A B L E 4: Equations relating holdings of US Treasury bills to prices, bill rates and official reserves, by country, 1969-73

Japan

R2= - 8 o 8

D.W.=2-SS9

G e r m a n y

£ ' = • 7 1 7

D.W. = 1-450

S w i t z e r l a n d

K * = - I 8 I

D.W. = 2 - 3 4 1

Canada

France

i ?2= - i 7 4 6

D.W. = 1-930

\ R2= - 5 0 0

D.W. = 1-789

U n i t e d K i n g d o m

I t a l y

ic»=-44

D.W.=0-987

R2= - 3 6

D.W. = i-Z9

B , = o - o o 8 —0-500?, —0-277R, + I - 0 0 8 O , (•090) (2-64) (1-885) (i6-95)

B , = —0-1480 —0-149?, —0-449R, + - 9 0 8 0 0 , (•537) . (-240) (1-340) (8-88)

B(= o - 0 5 5 5 — 0 - H 0 7 P , —o-o848i?( + 0 - 2 1 1 4 0 ,

(o-557) . (-518) (-693) (2-76)

B,==o-0237 —0-0583?, - 0 - 0 4 3 4 ^ , + 0 - 2 3 4 1 0 , (•772) (-902) (1-15) (2-42)

B , = o - 0 4 7 3 + o - i o 6 4 P , - f - o - i 8 9 f i , + o - 6 o o o O , (0-673) (0-722) (2-18) (5-74)

B , = —0-9474 - f o - i 6 i 5P, + 0 - 2 4 5 ! ? , + 0 - 6 3 7 0 , ( - 0 - 3 5 1 ) (0-578) (1-46) (5-48)

B , = o - 0 3 4 0 — o - i o i 2 P , —0-0225.1?, + 0 - 4 7 4 0 , (•660) ( - 0 - 9 3 4 ) . ( - 0 - 3 3 3 ) (4-22)

Conclusions

(19)

-m e n t o f t h e objectives o f p o l i c y . T h e purchases o f b i l l s b y f o r e i g n official i n s t i t u ­ t i o n s i n 1971 a n d o f l o n g - t e r m securities i n 1972 a n d e a r l y 1973 c o n t r i b u t e d s o m e w h a t t o l o w e r rates t h a n those c o m p a t i b l e w i t h t h e a t t a i n m e n t o f e x t e r n a l e q u i l i b r i u m i n 1971 a n d n o n - i n f l a t i o n a r y a g g r e g a t e d e m a n d i n 1972 a n d 1973.

T h e p r o b l e m s posed b y t h e a c c u m u l a t i o n o f g o v e r n m e n t securities relate n o t o n l y t o t h e a b i l i t y o f t h e Federal Reserve t o achieve a desired p a t t e r n o f interest rates b u t also t o m a i n t a i n t h e desired degree o f reserve a v a i l a b i l i t y . W h e t h e r t h i s w i l l p r o v e t o b e a m o r e serious p r o b l e m w i l l b e d e t e r m i n e d b y t h e success i n i m m o b i l i s i n g funds i n t o l o n g e r - t e r m a n d n o n - m a r k e t a b l e securities, a n d b y t h e e x t e n t t o w h i c h t h e d o l l a r i m p r o v e s i n f o r e i g n - e x c h a n g e m a r k e t s . A g r a d u a l s t r e n g t h e n i n g o f t h e d o l l a r l e a d i n g t o a g r a d u a l l i q u i d a t i o n o f securities b y f o r e i g n c e n t r a l banks s h o u l d pose n o serious d a n g e r e i t h e r i n t h e f o r m o f d i s r u p t i o n o f financial m a r k e t s o r a n excessive c r e a t i o n o f l i q u i d i t y b y t h e C e n t r a l B a n k .

References

Related documents

For identification of the text (words) that will be used for speech segments extraction, selection of existing Macedonian and Albanian words, which contain all

In this respect we have an odd case history of a female patient, who was relieved of her several years lasting lateralized tinnitus after a single mobilization of distal C

Although all our member centers provide space for various 12 step meetings and other peer to peer recovery supports – recovery centers are not affiliated with any of these groups..

Given that economy financialization in the countries studied is an integral part of their existence, the most statistically significant indicators of financializationhave been

4.4 Hazard Cage Card: Complete the hazard cage card (example included as Appendix A) for each cage housing animals that will be administered particularly hazardous

I transmit herewith for Senate advice and consent to ratification the Convention Between the United States of America and the Re- public of Latvia for the Avoidance of Double

While the current pilot study has contributed to further- ing knowledge about the use of recovery stories, there are some limitations. Participants were recruited over the inter-

It has been well understood that the performance of a cloud application heavily depends on its allocated share of resources, including computing resources, such as CPU and memory,