• No results found

'Errors and Erasures' decoding in RS coded DS CDMA using noncoherent M ary orthogonal modulation

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "'Errors and Erasures' decoding in RS coded DS CDMA using noncoherent M ary orthogonal modulation"

Copied!
5
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

`Errors-and-Erasures' Decoding in RS coded

DS-CDMA Using Noncoherent M-ary

Orthogonal Modulation

Lie-LiangYang,LajosHanzo

Dept. ofECS,Univ. ofSouthampton,SO171BJ,UK.

Tel: +442380593125,Fax: +442380594508

Email:[email protected],http://www-mobile.ecs.soton.ac.uk

Abstract|In this contribution we investigate the

per-formance of Reed-Solomon (RS) coded DS-CDMA using

noncoherentM-aryorthogonalmodulationovermultipath

Rayleighfadingchannels. `Errors-and-erasures'RS

decod-ingisconsidered,whereerasuresaredeclaredbasedon

var-iouserasureinsertionschemes,suchasthemaximum

Out-put Threshold Test (OTT), RatioThresholdTest(RTT)

andthejointMaximumOutputandRatioThresholdTest

(MOR-TT).Furthermore,theperformanceof

`errors-and-erasures' decodingemploying the jointMOR-TT is

com-pared to that of `error-correction-only' decoding and to

that of `errors-and-erasures' decoding using the OTT as

wellasthe RTT. The numericalresults showthat, when

using`errors-and-erasures'decoding,RScodesof agiven

code rate can achieve a signicantly higher coding gain

thanwithouterasureinformation,andthattheMOR-TT

techniqueoutperformsboththeRTTandtheOTT

tech-niques.

I. Introduction

InDirectSequenceCode-DivisionMultiple-Access

(DS-CDMA)cellularsystemsForwardErrorCorrection(FEC)

coding is often used for mitigating the eects of

fad-ing and interference. For thewell-knownReed-Solomon

(RS) codes, `errors-and-erasures' decoding is preferable

to `error-correction-only' decoding, since

`errors-and-erasures' decoding can typically achieve a signicantly

lower codeword decoding error probability, than

`error-correction-only' decoding, if a reliable erasure insertion

scheme is invoked. Hence, inthe context of RS

decod-ing it is benecial to determinethe reliability ofthe

re-ceived symbols and to erase the low-reliability symbols

prior to thedecoding process. Inthe context of

`errors-and-erasures'decoding,theerasureinsertionschemesare

expected to exhibitlow-complexity and low-delay, while

achievingaslowacodeworddecodingerrorprobabilityas

possible.

On the up-link of a DS-CDMA cellular system,

due to the high complexity of coherent

modula-tion/demodulation, which would require a pilot signal

foreachuser,noncoherentM-aryorthogonalmodulation

ThisworkhasbeencarriedoutintheframeworkoftheISTproject

IST-1999-12070TRUST,whichispartlyfundedbytheEuropeanUnion.

Theauthorswouldliketoacknowledge thecontributionsoftheir

col-leagues from Siemens AG, France Telecom - CNET, Centre Suisse

d'ElectroniqueetdeMicrotechniqueS.A.,King'sCollegeLondon,

Mo-torola Ltd, Panasonic European Laboratories GmbH, Robert Bosch

GmbH,TelefonicaInvestigationYDesarrolloS.A.Unipersonal,Toshiba

ResearchEuropeLtd.,TTINorteS.L.,UniversityofBristol,University

ofSouthampton.

using M = 64, i.e. 6-bit symbols has been proposed

for example for the reverse link of IS-95 [1]. Analysis

ofDS-CDMAsystemsusingM-aryorthogonal signaling

- both with and without RS FEC - has been provided

forexamplein[2]-[7] overmultipathfading channels. In

thecontextof`errors-and-erasures'decodingofRScoded

DS-CDMAusingM-aryorthogonalmodulation,the

era-sure insertion schemes based on the Output Threshold

Test(OTT) [3],[6], [8], RatioThresholdTest (RTT)[7]

as wellas joint Maximum Outputand Ratio Threshold

Test(MOR-TT)[9]constituteattractive,low-complexity

andlow-delay erasureinsertion schemes. Inthistreatise

theabovementionederasureinsertionschemesaswellas

theerasureinsertion schemebasedontheBayesianTest

(BT)[10] arerstreviewed. Then,the performanceofa

RScodedDS-CDMAsystemisinvestigated,whenM-ary

orthogonal signaling is employed in conjunction with a

OTT-,RTT-orMOR-TT-basederasureinsertionscheme

over dispersive Rayleigh-fading channels. Furthermore,

theperformanceoftheassociatedM-aryDS-CDMA

sys-teminconjunctionwithRScodesassistedby

`errors-and-erasures'decodingemployingtheOTT,RTTand

MOR-TT are estimatedand compared. Wealso compare the

codeword decoding error performance of the MOR-TT

based erasure insertion scheme to that of using

`error-correction-only'decodingwithoutsideinformation. Note

that, since the complexity of the BT-based erasure

in-sertion scheme is signicantly higher than that of the

OTT, RTTor MOR-TT, the performance investigation

for the RS coded M-ary DS-CDMA system using

BT-based`errors-and-erasures'decodingisnotconsideredin

thiscontribution.

II. System Overview

A. Transmitted Signal andChannel Model

ThetransmitterschematicofthecodedDS-CDMA

sys-temusingM-aryorthogonalmodulationisshowninFig.1.

Inthetransmitterof Fig.1the information bitsare rst

groupedinto b-bitsymbols, whereb=log

2

M. Then,K

information symbols are encoded into an N-symbolRS

codeword. Following RSencodingthe codewordsare

in-terleaved,inordertorandomizetheburstysymbolerrors.

Finally,eachRScodedsymbolis M-arymodulated, DS

spread and carrier-modulated using theapproach of [2],

inorder to formthe transmitted signal. Let us assume

(2)

Information

bits

RSEncoder

M-ary

orthogonal

modulation Interleaver

a i

I

(t) cos!ct

a i

Q

(t) sin!ct

Delay

T0

si(t)

+

Fig.1. Transmitterblock diagramofthecodedDS-CDMAsystemusing M-ary orthogonalmodulation,RSencodingandsymbol

interleaving.

i=1;2;:::;K,canbeexpressedas[2]

si(t) = p

PRcW j

(t)a i

I

(t)cos!ct (1)

+ p

PR

c W

j

(t T

0 )a

i

Q (t T

0 )sin!

c

t; 0tT

s ;

where P isthetransmittedsymbolpowerwithoutFEC,

Rc is the coding rate, Ts is the symbol duration, !c is

the carrier's angular frequency andT0 is anoset time.

Furthermore,W j

(t)isthejthWalsh-Hadamard

orthogo-nalfunction,whichrepresentsthejthorthogonalsignalof

theithuser'ssymbols,whilea i

I

(t)anda i

Q

(t)representthe

spreadingwaveformsoftheIn-phase(I)and Quadrature

(Q)phasechannels,respectively. Thesequadrature

com-ponentsare expressedas a i

# (t)=

P

1

h= 1 a

#;i

h

p(t hTc)

where # 2 fI;Qg, a #;i

h

represents independent

identi-cally distributed (i.i.d) random variables assuming

val-ues of +1 and -1 with equal probability of 1/2.

Fur-thermore, Tc represents the chip duration, and p(t) is

assumed to be the rectangular chip waveform, which is

dened over the interval (0;Tc]. Moreover, we assume

that Ns = Ts=Tc =bTb=Tc = bN, where Tb is the

bit-durationandN =Tb=Tc.

Thedispersivefading channelsare assumedtobe

dis-crete and time-invariant, having a channel impulse

re-sponse of h

i (t) =

P

L

l=1

il Æ(t

il

)exp( j

il

)

experi-encedbyuseri, where

il ;

il and

il

represent the

at-tenuationfactor,delay andphase-shiftforthe l th

multi-path component ofthe channel, respectively, while L is

thetotalnumberofdiversitypathsandÆ(t)isthe

Delta-function. Weassumethattheithuser'smultipath

atten-uations f

il

; l=1;2;:::;Lg are independent

Rayleigh-distributedrandomvariableshavingaPDFgivenby

f

il (R ) =

2R

exp

R 2

; (2)

where =E

(

il )

2

. The phasesf

il

; l=1;2;:::;Lg

of the dierent paths are assumed to be uniformly

dis-tributed randomvariablesin[0;2), whilethe ithuser's

pathdelaysof n

il

; l=1;2;:::;L o

are modeledas

ran-anduniformlydistributedin[0;T

s

). Wealsoassumethat

ideal powercontrol is employed, andhence the received

signalpowersare thesameforall Kusers. Thenthe

re-ceivedsignalatthebasestationgeneratedbytheKusers

canbeexpressedas

r(t)= K

X

i=1 y

i

(t)+n(t); (3)

where

yi(t)= L

X

l=1 p

P

il

W j

(t

il )a

i

I (t

il

)cos(!c(t

il

)

il )

+W j

(t T

0

il )a

i

Q (t T

0

il )sin(!

c (t

il

)

il )

:

Furthermore,n(t)representstheAdditiveWhite

Gaus-sianNoise(AWGN),whichis modeledasarandom

vari-ablewithzeromeananddouble-sidedpowerspectral

den-sity of N

0

=2. After the receiver's bandpass lter, n(t)

becomes anarrow-bandnoise process, whichcanbe

ex-pressed as n(t) = n

c (t)cos!

c t+n

s (t)sin!

c

t [2], where

n

c

(t)and n

s

(t) represent lowpass-ltered Gaussian

pro-cesses.

B. ReceiverModel

Thereceiverschematicconsideredinthispaperforthe

RScodedDS-CDMAsystemisshowninFig.2,which

in-cludesnoncoherentM-arydemodulation,equalgain

com-bining(EGC),maximumlikelihooddetection(MLD),

era-sureinsertionbasedontheOTT,RTTorMOR-TT,

dein-terleaving and RS `errors-and-erasures' decoding.

Fur-thermore, the square-law-based noncoherent M-ary

de-modulationblockisthesameasthatusedin[2]andhence

theinterestedreadersarereferredto[2]forfurtherdetails.

Multipathdiversity combininginvokingtheEGC

princi-plewasimplementedinthe`EGC'block. TheMLDblock

selectsthe largestfromitsinputvariablesandcomputes

thevalueof-theratioofthe`second'maximumtothe

(3)

r(t)

Square-law

noncoherent

M-ary

demodulation U

i

(1;1)

U i

(1;L)

U i

(m;1)

U i

(m;L)

U i

(M;1)

U i

(M;L)

EGC EGC EGC

U i

1

U i

m

U i

M

Y1

Select

the

largest

Output

or

erase

anM-ary

RScode

symbol

RSdecoder

Information

bits Deinterleaver

(MLD)

Fig.2. ReceivermodeloftheRScodedDS-CDMAsysteminvestigatedusingnoncoherentM-arydemodulation,multipathdiversity

combining,Maximum-LikelihoodDetection(MLD),MOR-TTbasederasureinsertion,deinterleavingandRS`errors-and-erasures'

decoding.

insertanerasure. Finally,aftersymbol-based

deinterleav-ing,theRSdecoderinvokes`errors-and-erasures'decoding

andthenoutputsthereceivedinformationbits.

III. Overview of Erasure Insertion

Schemes

In this section four erasure insertion schemes

asso-ciated with the noncoherent M-ary orthogonal

demod-ulation are reviewed. Let

U i

1 ;U

i

2 ;:::;U

i

M

represent

the decision variables input to the MLD block of Fig.2.

We expressthe maximumand the`second'maximumof

U i

1 ;U

i

2 ;:::;U

i

M as

Y

1 =max

1

U i

1 ;U

i

2 ;:::;U

i

M

; (4)

Y2=max

2

U i

1 ;U

i

2 ;:::;U

i

M

: (5)

Furthermore,letH1 andH0 representthehypothesesof

correctdecisionanderroneousdecisionconcerninganM

-arysymbolin theMLD block of Fig.2. Hence, we have

P(H0)=1 P(H1).

A. OTT

Inthe context of theOTT, the decisionvariable

sub-jectedtoanerasureinsertionisY1,i.e.,theactual

demod-ulator outputisobserved. Let fY

1

(yjH1)and fY

1 (yjH0)

be the conditional probability density functions (PDF),

giventhattheassociated demodulated symboliscorrect

(H1)andincorrect(H0),respectively.Asanexample,the

distributions offY

1

(yjH1) andfY

1

(yjH0) overmultipath

Rayleigh fading channels are shownin Fig.3, where the

diversity orderisL=3,theaveragesignal-to-noiseratio

(SNR)perbitis

b

=5dBandM =16;64;256. Fromthe

gureweobservethat foragivenvalueofM,fY

1 (yjH1)

ismainlydistributedoveranormalizeddemodulator

out-put range associated with relatively high values of Y1,

while fY

1

(yjH0) is spread overa rangehaving relatively

low values of Y1. Consequently, we can argue that the

demodulated symbols havingrelatively low valuesof Y1

are lessreliable thanthose havingrelatively high values

of Y1. Let YT beathresholdassociated withmaking an

erasuredecisionbasedontheOTT.Then,ifY1YT,the

Fig.3. ThePDFsofY1=maxfgunderthehypothesesofH1

andH0usingM=16;64;256,L=3;b=5dBovermultipath

Rayleigh-fadingchannels.

associated demodulated symbolshould be erased.

Oth-erwise,if Y1 >YT,the demodulatoroutputs aRS code

symbol.

B. RTT

Theratio involved inViterbi's RTT is dened as the

ratio of the maximum to the `second' maximum [8], or

equivalently,itcanbedenedastheratioofthe`second'

maximumtothemaximum,whichcanbeexpressedas

= Y

2

Y

1

; 01: (6)

Letf(rjH1)and f(rjH0) bethe conditionalPDFs

un-der the hypotheses of H1 associated with correct

deci-sions and H0 of erroneousdecisionof the MLD,

respec-tively. The distributions of f

(rjH1) and f

(rjH0)

us-ing the sameparameters as thoseinFig.3 are shownin

Fig.4,whenmultipathRayleighfadingchannelswere

(4)

Fig.4. ThePDFsof= Y

2

Y

1

underthehypothesesofH

1 and

H0using M =16;64;256, L =3; b =5dBovermultipath

Rayleigh-fadingchannels.

mainly spread over the range havingrelatively low

val-ues of , while f

(rjH

0

) is mainly distributed over the

range havingrelatively high values of. Therefore, the

demodulatedsymbolshavingarelativelylowratioofare

morereliable,thanthosehavingrelativelyhighvaluesof

. Consequently,apre-setthresholdR

T

canbeinvoked,

inordertoerasetheselow-reliability symbolsassociated

witharatioofR

T .

C. Joint MOR-TT

In the context of the joint MOR-TT, the erasure

in-sertion is based on the observation of both the

maxi-mum Y

1

of Eq.(4) and the ratio of Eq.(6).

Specif-ically, let f

Y1;

(y;rjH1) and f

Y1;

(y;rjH0) be the joint

two-dimensional(2D)PDFsofthemaximumY1 andthe

ratioassociatedwiththeMOR-TT,conditionedonboth

the correct detection and erroneous detection of M-ary

symbols. The properties of the MOR-TT can be

stud-ied with the aid of the 2D PDFs of f

Y

1 ;

(y;rjH

1 ) and

f

Y1;

(y;rjH0),for example,whichareshowninFig.5for

theparametersofM =64; L=3and

b

=5dB.Fromthe

2DsurfacesofFig.5weobservethatforthegiven

param-etersthepeakofthedistributionf

Y1;

(y;rjH1)islocated

atarelativelyhighvalueofY1orarelativelylowvalueof

,while thepeakof thedistributionf

Y1;

(y;rjH0) is

lo-catedatarelativelylowvalueofY1 andarelativelyhigh

value of . Theabove observations inturn imply that

f

Y1;

(y;rjH1)ismainlyspreadovertherangehaving

rel-ativelyhighvaluesofY1orrelativelylowvaluesof,while

f

Y1;

(y;rjH0)ismainlydistributedovertherangehaving

relatively low values of Y1 and relatively high values of

. Therefore, ifa demodulatedsymbolhas a maximum

outputvalueofY1 andaratioof,thathadfalleninthe

mainrangeoffY

1

;(y;rjH0),thesymbolconcernedmust

be a low-reliability symboland mustbe replacedby an

erasure. By contrast, if a demodulated symbolhas

val-uesofY1andthathadfallenoutsidethemainrangeof

fY

1

;(y;rjH0),thenthissymbolislikelytobecorrectand

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1 0

5

10

15

20

25

30

0

0.3

0.6

0.9

1.2

1.5

H

1

H

0

M=64, L=3,

b

=5dB

Variable

y

Variable

r

Probability

density

conditioned

on

H

1

and

H

0

Fig.5. The2DjointPDFsoff

Y

1 ;

(y;rjH1)andf

Y

1 ;

(y;rjH0)

usingtheparametersofM=64,L=3,b=5dBover

disper-siveRayleigh-fadingchannels.

theRSdecoder. Consequently,inordertoerasethe

low-reliabilityRScodedsymbols,weassumethatYT andRT

are two thresholds, which activate an erasure insertion,

wheneverY1YT andRT.

D. BT

For M-ary orthogonal modulation systems using the

Bayesiantest,allthedecisionvariablesinputtotheMLD

mustbeconsidered,inordertomakeanerasuredecision.

Specically, let si be the ith code symbolof the

alpha-bet, and U = U i

1 ;U

i

2 ;:::;U

i

M

be the vectorof M-ary

decisionvariables input to the MLD unitof Fig.2. Let

f(ujsi) be the conditionalPDF of U given that si was

sent,andibetheaprioriprobabilityofsendingsi. The

BTdecidesthatareceivedsymbolshouldbeerasedif

max

j

j f(ujs

j )

M

X

i=1

if(ujsi)

(1 ); (7)

where 0< < 1. Since inthe BT-based erasure

inser-tionschemethePDFsoff(ujsi)fori=1;2;:::;M have

tobeestimatedformakinganerasureinsertiondecision,

thecomplexityoftheBTissignicantlyhigherthanthat

ofthe OTT,RTTorMOR-TT,whichcarryoutan

era-suredecisionbasedontheestimationofeitherY1or,or

both. Furthermore,thenumericalresultsin[10]indicate

thattheBT-basederasureinsertionschemeonlyslightly

outperforms the RTT-based erasure insertion scheme, if

theSignaltoInterferenceplusnoiseratio(SINR)is

suÆ-cientlyhigh.

E. Performance

In this section the performance of RS coded M-ary

(5)

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20 0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

-11

-10

-9

-8

-7

Log

of

codeword

decoding

error

probability

Ratio

threshold

(R

T

)

Amplitude

threshold

(Y

T

)

Fig.6. Codeworddecodingerrorprobabilityversustheamplitude

threshold,YT andtheratiothreshold,RT fortheRS(32,20)

FECcodeusing `errors-and-erasures'decodingbased onthe

MOR-TTerasure insertionscheme over dispersive Rayleigh

fadingchannelsusingtheparametersofM=32,L=3,K=1,

b

=12dBandRS(32,20).

schemes is estimated and compared for a given set of

parameters. Fig.6 shows the codeword decoding error

probabilityofthe M-ary DS-CDMAsystemover

disper-sive Rayleigh fading channels usingthe joint MOR-TT.

The RS(32,20) code constructed over the Galois Field

GF(32)=GF(2 5

)correspondingto5-bitsymbolswasused

and`errors-and-erasures'decodingbasedontheMOR-TT

insertionschemewasemployed. Fromtheresults we

ob-servethatthereexistsanoptimumthresholdvalueofR

T

or Y

T

, for which`errors-and-erasures' decoding achieves

theminimumcodeworddecodingerrorprobability. This

observationinturnimpliesthatforgivenvaluesofM,

di-versityorderofL,numberofusersK,SNRperbitof

b as

wellasforagivenRScode,thereexistoptimum

thresh-olds Y

T and R

T

, for which the `errors-and-erasures'

de-codingusingthejointMOR-TTerasureinsertionscheme

achievestheminimumcodeworddecodingerror

probabil-ity. Thisminimum codeword decoding errorprobability

islower,thanthatassociatedwithusingtheRTTaloneor

theOTTalone. NotethatinFig.6thepoint

correspond-ingtoY

T

=0and

T

=1representsthecodeword

decod-ing error probability using`error-correction-only'

decod-ing. Therefore,wecanobservethat`errors-and-erasures'

decoding outperforms`error-correction-only'decoding,if

the appropriate thresholdsare invoked. However, ifthe

threshold Y

T

is too highand simultaneouslythe

thresh-old T is too low, too many erasures will be activated,

potentially erasing correct demodulated symbols.

Con-sequently, the codeword decoding error probability

us-ing `errors-and-erasures' decoding might be signicantly

higher,thanthatusing`error-correction-only'decoding.

Finally,inFig.7wecomparedthe`errors-and-erasures'

RSdecodingperformanceofoursystemsusingtheOTT,

Fig.7. Codeword decodingerror probability versus SNR per

bitforRS(32,20)`erasures-and-erasures'decodingusingOTT,

RTTandjointMOR-TTerasureinsertionschemes.

nels. The parameters used was M = 32, the number

of users was K = 10, the numberof chips per bit was

N =128and the diversity order was L =2;3;4. From

the results we observethat the proposed MOR-TT

era-sureschemeoutperformsboththeRTTandOTTerasure

insertionschemes.

References

[1] Telcomm.IndustryAssociation(TIA),Washington,DC,Mobile

sta-tion- Basestationcompatibilitystandard for dual-mode wideband

spreadspectrumcellular system,EIA/TIAInterimStandardIS-95,

1993.

[2] L.M.A.Jalloul andJ.M. Holtzman,\Performanceanalysisof

DS/CDMAwithnoncoherentM-aryorthogonalmodulationin

mul-tipathfadingchannels,"IEEEJournalonSelectedAreasin

Commu-nications,vol.12,pp.862{870,June1994.

[3] S.W.KimandW.Stark,\PerformancelimitsofReed-Solomon

codedCDMAwithorthogonalsignalinginaRayleigh-fading

chan-nel,"IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 46, pp. 1125{

1134,September1998.

[4] L.-L.YangandL.Hanzo,\Errors-and-erasuresdecodingof

Reed-Solomoncodesoverfrequency-selectiveRayleighfadingchannel

us-ingM-aryorthogonalsignaling,"inProceedingsofIEEEVTC'2000,

(Tokyo,Japan),pp.854{858,May2000.

[5] L.-L.Yang,K.Yen,M.Dillinger,andL.Hanzo,\PerformanceofRS

codedDS-CDMAusingnoncoherentM-aryorthogonalmodulation

over multipathfadingchannels,"in Proceedingsof PIMRC'2000,

(London,UK),pp.584{588,September2000.

[6] L.-L. Yang and L. Hanzo, \Performance analysis of coded

M-aryorthogonal signaling usingerrors-and-erasures decodingover

frequency-selectivefadingchannels,"ToappearinIEEEJournalon

SelectedAreasinCommunications.

[7] L.-L.Yang,K.Yen,andL.Hanzo,\AReed-Solomoncoded

DS-CDMAsystem using noncoherent M-aryorthogonal modulation

overmultipathfadingchannels,"IEEEJournalonSelectedAreas

inCommunications,vol.18,November2000.

[8] A.J.Viterbi,\Arobustratio-thresholdtechniquetomitigatetone

andpartialbandjammingincodedMFSKsystems,"in

Proceed-ingsofIEEEMilitaryCommunicationsConferencesRec.,pp.22.4.1{

22.4.5,IEEE,October1982.

[9] L.-L.YangandL.Hanzo,\PerformanceanalysisofRScoded

DS-CDMAusingnoncoherentM-aryorthogonalmodulationover

mul-tipathfadingchannels,"SubmittedtoIEEEJournalonSelected

Ar-easinCommunications,October2000.

[10] C.W.BaumandM.B.Pursley,\Bayesianmethodsfor erasure

insertion in frequency-hop communication system with

partial-bandinterference,"IEEETransactionsonCommunications,vol.40,

References

Related documents