• No results found

Collaborative Data Analysis on Wall Displays

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Collaborative Data Analysis on Wall Displays"

Copied!
49
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Collaborative Data Analysis on Wall Displays

(2)

2 [source: The Diverse and Exploding Digital Universe, IDC, 2008] [credit: Did You Know; Fisch, McLeod, Brenman]

(3)
(4)

4

The value of data depends on our ability to

extract meaning and act on it

how can we effectively access data?

- understand its structure and content?

- make comparisons?

- make decisions?

(5)
(6)

Traditional Information Visualization Context

work context

specific questions / tasks

domain-specific

PC based

(7)

Traditional context no longer sufficient

More data to analyze & understand

Complex problems

(8)

Why Collaborative Work?

Go beyond data extraction

Discuss, negotiate, argue interpretations of data

Reduce individual bias

(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)

Research Space

Technique

• Representations for small / large displays • Interaction techniques Application • Social network analysis • Search • Biology Evaluation • Contextual overview • Methodologies Theory • Collaborative data analysis work • Perception

(13)

Challenging Aspect Challenge

Socio

- T

echnical

Specific Research Challenges

(14)

Challenging Aspect Challenge

Users Multiple backgrounds, work styles, preferences, …

Socio

- T

echnical

Isenberg et al., Information Visualization Journal, 2011

Specific Research Challenges

(15)

Challenging Aspect Challenge

Users Multiple backgrounds, work styles, preferences, … Tasks Centered around collaborative work

Socio

- T

echnical

Specific Research Challenges

(16)

Challenging Aspect Challenge

Users Multiple backgrounds, work styles, preferences, … Tasks Centered around collaborative work

Cognition Collaborative foraging & sensemaking

Socio

- T

echnical

Isenberg et al., Information Visualization Journal, 2011

Specific Research Challenges

(17)

Challenging Aspect Challenge

Users Multiple backgrounds, work styles, preferences, … Tasks Centered around collaborative work

Cognition Collaborative foraging & sensemaking Analysis Results Consensus, shared insight

Socio

- T

echnical

Specific Research Challenges

(18)

Challenging Aspect Challenge

Users Multiple backgrounds, work styles, preferences, … Tasks Centered around collaborative work

Cognition Collaborative foraging & sensemaking Analysis Results Consensus, shared insight

Evaluation Social interaction around data

Socio

- T

echnical

Isenberg et al., Information Visualization Journal, 2011

Specific Research Challenges

(19)

Challenging Aspect Challenge

Users Multiple backgrounds, work styles, preferences, … Tasks Centered around collaborative work

Cognition Collaborative foraging & sensemaking Analysis Results Consensus, shared insight

Socio

- T

echnical

Specific Research Challenges

(20)

Challenging Aspect Challenge

Users Multiple backgrounds, work styles, preferences, … Tasks Centered around collaborative work

Cognition Collaborative foraging & sensemaking Analysis Results Consensus, shared insight

Evaluation Social interaction around data Interaction Multiple parallel inputs

Visual Representations Multiple displays, novel display & input technology

Socio

- T

echnical

Isenberg et al., Information Visualization Journal, 2011

Specific Research Challenges

(21)
(22)

INRIA-WILD Large Display Wall

size: 5.5 x 1.8 m (32 LCD screens, 16 machines) resolution: 20480 x 6400 pixels (130 million px)

(23)

In Collaboration: Various Viewing Distances and

Angles

(24)
(25)
(26)
(27)

where to put information?

task dependent

general guidelines

(28)

where to put information?

all areas created equal?

viewing angles/distances?

what about walking?

Reading visualizations

(29)

Quantitative Experiment

Goal:

understand influence of view distortion on

perception in elemental graphical tasks

(30)

2d visualizations and visual variables

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

Category 1 Category 2 Category 3 Category 4

Series 1 Series 2 Series 3

position

lengt

h

(31)

2d visualizations and visual variables

Series 1

Category 1 Category 2 Category 3 Category 4

angle

(32)

Perception of Elemental Graphical Tasks

(33)
(34)
(35)
(36)

36

study setup

(37)

static position results

(38)

static position results (estimation)

Close Viewing Distance

(39)

linear model

true object size

screen horizontal position

screen vertical position

viewer distance

study 1: modeling data

 

  

(40)

result summary

unexpected order and behavior

previous work

why low error?

why high error?

bezels, task

orientation

>

>

(41)
(42)

42

study 2

replicated experiment with free movement

9 users

6 magnitudes

Time & Estimation Errors (absolute and direction)

(43)

observed 3 strategies

not all of them effective

Step-back as bad as Close

(44)

Summary

44

new findings

avoid comparisons with lower screens

careful with full screen visualizations

choose robust visual variables

inform viewers of distortion

use mediators

encourage walking, with correct strategy

bezels could be beneficial

(45)
(46)

46

example

data: US Bureau of the Census

vis: http://www.gsd.harvard.edu/gis/ municipal data of employees working and living at different municipalities

(47)
(48)

conclusion

current work

test more visual variables

and variations

model errors for entire visualizations

study distortion learning

study effect on collaboration

(49)

Collaborative Data Analysis on Wall Displays

References

Related documents

Define the aim(s) of your TeamSTEPPS Intervention. Develop a plan for testing the effectiveness of your TeamSTEPPS Intervention. Develop an implementation plan - for medical

In this step, in order to compare correctly the data which have different measurement unit, a transformation operation is made and after this process the data values are obtained

In this paper, a joined effort of industry and the HU University of Applied Science at the development and implementation of an Enterprise Resource Planning minor is described that is

The keyword spotter we devise is based on non- linearly mapping the input acoustic representation of the speech utterance along with the target keyword into an abstract vector

There were two groups in this study, namely experimental groups and control group. The experimental groups were treated using Reciprocal strategy while the

Total Registered Voters on checklist for this polling place: Total Number of Voters checked off on the entrance checklist: (this includes absentee ballots).. Total number of

independent setpoints from conflicting with setpoints written through the interface as heating and cooling setpoints through the interface cannot be independently written. When the