• No results found

asset management advisory services TCC Asset Management 1

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "asset management advisory services TCC Asset Management 1"

Copied!
15
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

asset management

advisory services

(2)

tcc overview

TCC is the largest independently owned compliance

consultancy in the UK. TCC has an excellent reputation

for delivering specialist regulatory compliance services.

The core competencies of the business revolve around

understanding the FCA’s expectations in the relevant

market and providing practical solutions allowing firms

to appropriately meet these requirements.

TCC’s support to clients includes understanding their

individual requirements and assisting with project scoping,

business model and processes analysis, regulatory mapping,

controls gap analysis, regulatory and business change

impact assessments, processes and policies development,

planning and implementing any required remedial actions.

Governance &

Culture

Risk

Management

systems &

controls

change

implementation

TCC delivers expert solutions to the

asset management sector through the

following core competencies:

(3)

asset management support

TCC has a proven track record in providing support to our

asset management clients.

The experienced Asset Management Advisory Services

Team includes:

Ex-FCA Supervisors in the Asset Management

Department who have previously led individual firm risk assessments, thematic reviews and fund supervision

Compliance professionals who have held numerous regulatory/compliance policy and monitoring roles at large and medium sized global asset managers Individuals with experience in back/middle office functions and within global transfer agents and third party administrators

Experience within associated sectors including Wealth Management, Financial Advice, Life and Pension Providers and Discretionary Fund Management

andrew glessing

Managing Director Advisory Services

All of the Advisory Services team have

extensive experience working for the

FCA or within compliance functions of

regulated firms

(4)

FCA business plan themes

Culture

Including governance, responsibilities of the board, management information and escalation of issues, autonomy and empowerment of control functions, accountability, remuneration, recruitment

Fund charges paid by investors

Transparency and clarity and unfair contract terms

Inducements and conflicts of interest

Reference to potential MiFID II requirements

Market abuse

FCA’s expectations of firms and their controls and new focus on high

frequency trading

Financial crime controls

Focus on both anti-money laundering (including sanctions and terrorist

financing) and anti-bribery and corruption measures

Technology resilience

The FCA will take action on firms that fail to maintain technology that could result in risks to consumers. Firms must have a robust BCP plan in place and sufficient protection against cyber crime

Implementation of EU law

The FCA made reference to its implementation of various measures which will require changes to policies and procedures, including – MiFID II, Market Abuse Regulation, PRIIPS, Benchmark Regulation

The FCA published their 2015 Business Plan in March. For the first time, there is significant focus from the FCA on the asset management sector, with commitment to developing an asset management market study. Below lists key themes from the Business Plan, many of which read across to the to the MiFID II European requirements:

Post authorisation review of funds and

segregated mandates

Whether funds are investing and performing as stated in the fund material (factsheets, KIIDs and prospectuses); likely to consider model portfolios, risks, charges, target market

Distribution models

The FCA will undertake a market study into non-advised sales of investment and protection products, including how firms support consumers in choosing products that are suitable for their circumstances

(5)

mifid ii/mifir requirements

In early 2014, the European Parliament and Council adopted new legislation that will overhaul MiFID. The revised Directive (MiFID II) and new Regulation (MiFIR) represent a significant set of reforms which will lead to a reshaping of the financial markets, the products and services that firms provide and the relationship between firms and their customers. Both MiFID II and MiFIR entered into force on 2nd July 2014, and must be implemented within Member States by 3 January 2017. Key focus areas for asset managers include:

Product design and governance – product approval process

requirements, including target market and risk identification

New power around product intervention – MiFIR is proposed

to give regulators new powers to prohibit or restrict the

marketing distribution or sale of certain financial instruments or

financial activity

Transparency requirements – including costs/charges,

execution venues, third party payments

Voice recording – requirement to record all telephone and

face-to-face conversations that may lead to the execution of an order

Execution-only banned for further instruments – e.g.

structured UCITS funds, shares that embed a derivative, bonds

not traded on regulated markets

Best execution and order handling – policy must contain sufficient

detail, be in clear to understand language and firms must make

public for each class of instrument the top 5 execution venues used

on an annual basis and firms should not receive any remuneration

for routing client orders to particular trading or execution venues

Inducements – investment firms undertaking portfolio management

will be banned from accepting fees, commission or any other

benefit paid or provided by a third party relating to the precision

of services to clients. Still to be determined whether investment

research and execution-related services provided to IMs out of

dealing commission will be permitted

Bundled services – firms will be required to provide evidence

on the costs and charges of each component of a service (e.g.

execution and investment research services)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

(6)

hot topic - market abuse

The FCA conducted a thematic review of how asset management firms control the risk of committing market abuse. The review considered how firms control the risks of insider dealing, improper disclosure and market manipulation, with a primary focus on equities and insider dealing.

Firms should review their policies and procedures to control the risk of market abuse and ensure that these operate effectively and cover all material risks.

Key Points:

Good Practice:

Managing the risk that

inside information could

be received but not

identified

• Effective policies to identify and capture inside information which are consistently applied

• Policies should include when information is unintentionally received (e.g. when enough details are provided for the fund manager to deduce the company and the nature of the event)

ü Wall crossings - an initial point of contact for soundings that is independent of the fund managers

ü Company-specific research - a designated point of contact for staff to discuss any concerns about whether inside information might have been received and a consistent approach to meeting companies prior to results being published

Controlling access to

inside information and

managing the risk of

improper disclosure

• Policy limiting the sharing of inside information to those who need to know

• Monitoring in place to assess the effectiveness of this policy

ü

Maintaining a detailed log of who is privy to the inside

information

Pre-trade controls

to prevent market

manipulation and insider

dealing

• Pre-trade block on trading securities on the restricted list (and ensuring securities are added to the restricted list on a timely basis)

• Documenting the rationale for trading decisions

ü

A segregated dealing function which can flag potentially

manipulative transactions

ü

Recording the telephone lines of staff directly involved in

the investment process

(7)

Key Points:

Good Practice:

Post-trade surveillance

• Post-trade surveillance that effectively highlights potentially suspicious trades (including trades preceding price-moving corporate announcements)

• Thoroughly investigated any potentially suspicious transac-tions

• Comprehensive documentation of external meetings

• Awareness of front office research activity

ü Regular monitoring of the recorded telephone lines of fund managers and traders

Personal account dealing

policies

• Effective policies and procedures to reduce the risk of market abuse

ü Requiring pre-trade approval for PA dealing and conducting a post-trade review to monitor for any suspicious activity

Training

• Training (new joiner and annual) to ensure employees’ under-standing of the market abuse rules is kept up-to-date

ü Face-to-face training to complement online training

ü Include recent market abuse cases/scenarios specific to the firm

ü Frequent reminders to staff to be alert to the risk that information could be received in unexpected situations

(8)

tcc areas of expertise

ü

Corporate governance structure and effectiveness

ü

Management information provided to Boards and

Committees

ü

Senior management responsibilities

ü

Culture and treating clients fairly

ü

Conduct risk

ü

Training and competence requirements

ü

Recruitment, remuneration whistleblowing policies

Governance & Culture

ü

Business model analysis and risk identification

ü

Market conduct, including trading practices

ü

Inducements and conflicts of interest

ü

Product design and governance

ü

Policies and procedures

ü

Client money

ü

Fee structures

ü

Oversight of third party providers and contingency

plans

(9)

tcc areas of expertise

ü

Transaction reporting

ü

Portfolio compliance - trade monitoring

ü

Best execution and order handling

ü

Market abuse controls

ü

Financial crime controls

ü

Errors and incidents

ü

IT resilience

systems & controls

ü

MiFID II

ü

AIFMD

ü

Market Abuse Regulation

ü

Global operating models

ü

Order management system implementation

ü

Impact assessments

ü

Post implementation review

(10)

client engagement examples

TCC has undertaken a variety of client engagements in the asset management sector, which include:

Detailed review of firm’s conduct risk within the business model, including culture and governance, product development and distribution processes

Assessing the completeness and accuracy of transaction reporting arrangements, including operational

procedures, compliance testing and oversight of third parties

Conduct Risk

compliance function

Full-scale review of compliance structure and framework, including re-designing the compliance monitoring plan, development of new policies and procedures and providing training to staff where gaps were identified

regulatory change

portfolio monitoring

change implementation

transaction reporting

Assessing compliance with the AIFMD with particular focus on risk management, fund valuation and board reporting

Review of portfolio monitoring arrangements with particular focus on best execution and market abuse controls

Long-term project leading the compliance implications of implementing a new global order management system, including the development of a new global target operating model for compliance

(11)

case study:

full compliance review

and remediation

TCC approach:

ü

Business analysis:

Full scale business model analysis and

understanding of the scope of the firm’s activities

ü

Regulatory mapping:

Determining all applicable regulations, FCA

handbook requirements and FCA permissions required

ü

Risk identification:

Identifying all risks associated with the business

model, including all conflicts of interest

ü

Gap analysis:

Assessing the adequacy of current risk management

activities, including all governance and oversight arrangements in

place

ü

Remediation design:

Design of a new risk management framework

from risk identification process through to management, mitigation

and the ICAAP

ü

Implementation:

Updating policies and procedures, introducing

a new compliance monitoring plan and risk log. Detailed project

management plan and timelines and provided regular updates to

senior management

ü

Training:

providing training to staff where knowledge gaps were

identified (e.g. market abuse)

Client: A medium sized UK-based asset manager

Background: Development of processes, procedures, systems and

controls had not kept pace with the growth of the business and increasing regulatory requirements

Task: Required a full FCA-style assessment of its compliance

framework, highlighting any gaps or weaknesses

For more information about how we can help

your business, get in touch on 020 3772 7230

to arrange a meeting to discuss your individual requirements.

(12)

case study:

new global compliance

operating model

TCC approach:

ü

Business analysis:

Primary analysis to understand the firm’s current

systems, processes and controls in place across all offices globally

ü

Impact analysis:

Working closely with the business to understand

their requirements across all front to back office functions and

hosting global workshops to discuss current state processes

ü

Requirements:

Follow-up workshops to set out the future global

operating model and processes and to discuss identified challenges,

inconsistencies in local processes and regulatory requirements

ü

Project management:

Monitoring key deliverables against planned

deadlines, tracking risks and issues through to resolution in a RAID

log and providing updates to the committees

ü

Implementation:

Sitting alongside the business stakeholders in

different locations globally and supporting the implementation of

new systems, processes and reports and improvements required

ü

Testing:

Conducting user acceptance testing of the newly

implemented processes, systems and reports

Client: Top 5 global asset manager

Background: Their existing operating model and architecture was

based upon the consolidation of a number of legacy boutique businesses, and as such was complex, inefficient and costly and carried significant operational risk

Task: The client was implementing a new order management system

and required full re-engineering of their compliance processes, systems and reports globally

For more information about how we can help

your business, get in touch on 020 3772 7230

to arrange a meeting to discuss your individual requirements.

(13)

asset management team

chris martin

Senior Regulatory Consultant

Profile: Chris is a Regulatory Consultant

with nearly 10 years’ experience in financial services, specialising in Asset Management.

TCC: Client engagements have included conducting assessments of firm’s

compliance functions, including governance arrangements, systems and controls, policies, processes and procedures, implementation and oversight of remedial actions; advising firms on the impact of new regulation and recommending changes to comply with the new requirements; Compliance workstream lead for implementation of a new Order Management System (OMS) at a global asset manager.

FCA: Chris was previously Lead Associate in the Complex Events Team in the

FCA’s Supervision Division. Prior to that he was a Senior Associate in the Asset Management and Advisers Department. His work included leading firm specific risk assessment visits and thematic work looking to proactively identify risk in the firm’s business model; leading supervision projects and cases, including industry redress schemes.

Industry: Chris has previously worked at Barings Asset Management and

International Financial Data Services (IFDS).

andrew glessing

Managing Director Advisory Services

Profile: Andrew is Managing Director of

TCC Advisory Services with over 25 years experience in regulated firms, including 7 years FSA/FCA experience in firm and thematic supervision

TCC:Client engagements have included delivery and oversight of governance, risk management and compliance reviews and the development and

implementation of remediation plans; assessment of firms’ readiness for FCA-style supervision and management of conduct risk; assessments of compliance with the FCA’s guidance on provider/distributor arrangements; fund manager authorisations.

FCA:Team manager and lead supervisor for a number of large and medium-sized asset managers under the FSA and FCA’s supervisory models. Work included firm specific risk assessments of asset managers’ governance and risk management arrangements, systems and controls, policies and procedures and prudential risk management, change in control assessments, oversight of remedial work, assessment of outsourced arrangements and investigation of conduct related issues in the sector.

Industry: Andrew’s other previous experience includes roles in asset

management and life and pensions organisations.

The Asset Management Team is led by senior regulatory consultant Chris Martin. Get in touch

with him on 020 3772 7230 to arrange a meeting

(14)

asset management team

judith wright

Associate Director

Profile: Judith is an Associate Director of TCC

Advisory Services with over 20 years financial services experience, including 7 years in compliance monitoring and policy roles at asset managers.

TCC: Client engagements have included detailed assessments of asset

mangers’ compliance functions, governance and systems and controls, including full conduct risk assessments and working with the business to implement regulatory change; in-depth reviews of asset manager’s policies and procedures, including outsourcing arrangements, Committee ToR,

development of the Compliance Manual, setting of the compliance monitoring plan and audit work to cover the whole business from the front to back office.

Industry: Judith was a Compliance Policy Manager at a global asset manager

and prior to that was a Compliance Officer at another global asset manager. Judith has held additional roles in wealth management, discretionary fund management and financial advice.

Judith also holds a law degree.

sarah barton-white

Regulatory Consultant

Profile: Sarah is a Regulatory Consultant, with

previous portfolio compliance experience at a top investment bank.

TCC: Client engagements have included advising firms on new and existing

regulatory requirements including action plans for how firm’s can adapt and ensure compliance with new regulatory requirements; system and controls assessments, change implementation projects looking to redesign global compliance models, the design and build of compliance procedures, policies and manuals, investment guideline monitoring oversight, compliance monitoring arrangements and risk management assessments.

Industry: Sarah worked at Goldman Sachs as a Senior Compliance Analyst,

first in their central Regulatory Team and then in the Asset Management Compliance Advisory Team supporting the front office. Sarah’s work included handling trading errors and guideline breaches, pre- and post-trade compliance support (guideline queries, new issues, restricted list, best execution, fair allocation, cross-trades), product launches and desk/product reviews.

Sarah has a legal qualification (GDL) from BPP Law School and a BA from University College London.

The Asset Management Team is led by senior regulatory consultant Chris Martin. Get in touch

with him on 020 3772 7230 to arrange a meeting

(15)

Head Office

UK Operations Centre

The Consulting Consortium Ltd

6th Floor

10 Lower Thames Street London

EC3R 6EN

Tel: +44 (0) 800 970 9754

www.theconsultingconsortium.com

The Consulting Consortium Ltd 1 Broadgate

The Headrow Leeds

West Yorkshire LS1 8EQ Tel: +44 (0) 113 261 5860 Fax: +44 (0) 113 261 5861

References

Related documents

procedures were satisfactory overall, OAAS identified opportunities for improvement in certain areas including governance over mobile device management practices; asset

Power Supplies for constant current HI-POWER LEDs 350/700mA Alimentatori per LED in corrente costante HI-POWER

On November 18, 2013, an initial ruling requiring released requiring minimum security controls for safeguarding controlled technical information on DoD contractor

In Z, Aristotle first argues (ch.. O n the one hand, the phrase 'that-which4s' refers to what a thing <precisely> is, as well as the particular thing involved, and on the

Or- den Foral 69/2013, de 19 de junio, de la Consejera de Salud, por la que se crea y regula el Registro Poblacional de Enfermedades Raras de Navarra y se crea el fichero de datos

Although it is true that, due to the small size of sub-samples of juveniles from the same ethnic group, the data in Tables 1 and 2 pertain to all juveniles from the Balkan

• provide high level oversight of financial and asset management responsibilities through Audit Committee/CEO reporting to council on development and implementation of Asset

One alternative is to substitute a regulated power supply with an output equal to the the battery voltage and current capacity found by dividing the VA rating of the normal