• No results found

Operational Risk Information System

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Operational Risk Information System"

Copied!
8
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Operational Risk Information

System

(2)

SIRO integrates all the modules necessary to manage Operational Risk using Advanced (AMA) Methods.

- Common data management: organizational structure, process, risk and control

maps, business lines, risk categories...

- Eventsdatabase.

- Risk & Control Self-Assessment (RCSA) questionnaires.

- Scenario analysis.

- Key Risk Indicators– KRIs. - Action Plans.

- Internal Model-based Capital Calculation Engine.

- Integrated reporting, dashboards.

Why SIRO?

“SIRO is a leading tool for the

integrated management of Operational

Risk in Credit and Insurance

Institutions and Non-financial

Corporations developed by Management

Solutions”

Operational Risk Information System (SIRO)

Event database query. Menu for direct access to SIRO functionality

“Operational Risk

architectures based on

integrating separate

specialist applications for

each module soon

become problematic

(coherence, interfaces,

extra costs, substantial

effort to reconcile

information). These were

however the only option

when no integrated

solutions were available

in the market”

“The use of SIRO has

moved beyond the

Operational Risk

Management field. Its

Capital Calculation Engine

has been adapted for the

management of Insurable

Risk and Insurance

Portfolio Optimization in

Large Industrial

Corporations”

(3)

Advantages

Main features:

- Experience:available since 2004: mature and advancedtool.

- Proven tool: has passed supervisory audit and validationprocesses. - Credentials: implemented in a large number of Financial Institutions.

Large user base.

- Developments: methodologicaland functional updates released on an

annualbasis.

- Adaptable:a common core supports the most advancedOperational Risk

Management methodologies, but is flexible to adaptto the individual needs of organizations.

- Quantification: statistical-mathematical engine (SIRO-ARE)that

incorporates the most advanced techniques in the market: the widest range of distributions for severity fitting (e.g. Generalized Hyperbolic), capacity to work with scenarios and maximum flexibility afforded by the tool’s R languageinterpretation capability.

- Sophisticated reporting: integrates an OLAP engine, interactive

graphics export to Excel and pdf, production of regular reportsfor Management and Business Areas. Large number of predefined and

customized reports.

- Other areas: specific versions for areas outside Operational Risk: Insurable risk (Insurance policy optimization), Audit / Internal Control /

Compliance and Business Continuity.

Operational Risk self-assessment questionnaire

“The tool should adapt to

“Solutions based on

qualitative judgement

(‘red’, ‘yellow’ and ‘green’)

do not capture risk in an

economic sense and have

serious difficulties when it

comes to integrating their

results with the actual

impact of captured events

for the purpose of

estimating Regulatory

Capital (AMA approach)”

(4)

Modules

Operational Risk - Loss Database

Registration of events, their impacts, direct and indirect recoveries Capture

Individual, screen-based

Massive, screen-based (Excel)

Automated capture interface Capture workflow

N:1 relationship with risks

Possibility to attach documents to events Multi-impact events

Integration with Action Plans

Setup of indicators, their interpretation and scales Capture

Individual, screen-based

Massive, screen-based (Excel)

Automated capture interface

N:1 relationship with risks and with risk categories Alert generation

Integration with Action Plans

Operational Risk -Indicators Common data management module Operational Risk -Questionnaires Operational Risk -Action Plans

Processes, Risks, Controls, Organizational Structure, Users and Roles, Risk Categories, Business Lines...

Features

Can be integrated into the Corporate Intranet Allows automatic data capture from enterprise master data

Allows data transfer to external systems Focus on risk users. Minimum workload Full traceability of changes

Possibility to attach documents

Work organization through campaigns Customizable assessment workflow Questionnaire generation from templates Assessment methodology quantifiable in currency units

Assessment auditability

Online VaR calculation through Monte Carlo Dynamic questionnaires User help Specific questionnaires Outsourcing risk IT contingency plans Process continuity Scenario analysis

Direct relationship with risks and controls Possibility to attach documents to plans Alert generation

Action plans resulting from high risk assessment scores, impact of significant events, outlier indicators or deficient controls

Integration of action plans with audit recommendations

Management and valuation of physical assets Insurance portfolio management

Loss capture

Modeling of frequency and severity distributions “What-if” analysis

Franchise and reinsured risk optimization Captive insurer management

Process criticality rating oriented to establishing Continuity Plans

Assessment of lack of continuity regarding:

Financial impact

Regulators awareness

Reputational impact

Affectation to other areas

Client perception

Integrated OLAP engine

Integrated statistical calculation engine Interactive graphics

Regular, integrated reports

Document management on the system’s database

Workflow engine backed by database Profiling and authentication can be delegated Online historical and current data query Traceability and auditability of changes

Insurable Risk / Insurance Portfolio Optimization

Business continuity /

BIA analysis Cross-functional features

Operational Risk Information System (SIRO)

“Less mature tools capture

a snapshot picture of the

‘risk map’, but do not stand

up well to changes in the

organization and its

processes over time”

SIRO-ARE (Advanced Risk Engine)

Data analysis and cleansing, hypothesis verification and discovery and setup of Operational Risk categories

Frequency and severity distribution fitting Integration of sources:

Internal loss database

Self-assessment questionnaires (RCSA)

External events VaR calculation Back testing Stress Testing

Sensitivity and stability analysis Regulatory reporting

(5)

Three-layer architecture

A Java server that implements a

servlet container and a Java Server Pages (JSP) engine, of which there are versions for almost all current Operating Systems: WebSphere, Tomcat, WebLogic, etc.

A Relational Database Management System (RDBMS): Oracle, SQL Server, etc.

A web server (optional), generally part of the intranet infrastructure, where user authentication is delegated.

Client: user PC with a web browser.

Technical features

Developed independently of the Operating System, Java Application Server and Relational Database Management System used.

Security can be delegated to the existing corporate Single Sign On/Intranet architecture.

- Delegated authentication. - Delegated authorization.

Protection of URLs and against malicious access.

Corrective maintenance and support with flexible Service Levels tailored to each individual Organization.

Yearly version updates under the maintenance contract.

Technical architecture

SIRO architecture

Technical features

“A key strength in the SIRO architecture design

has been the strict use of standard market

technology to minimize the demands placed on

the Technology and Systems Area”

(6)

Main SIRO implementations

The different SIRO modules are widely implemented in organizations of various kinds and endorsed by Regulatory Authorities. Among the types of organizations in which SIRO is implemented are:

 Central Banks Regulatory and Supervisory Bodies.

 Large, highly diversified financial groups with a presence in different geographical regions.

 Financial institutions with an international presence.

 Financial institutions with a local presence.

 Insurance companies.

 Corporations in industry sectors (Insurable risk module/Insurance portfolio optimization).

Credentials

“Operational Risk units have very limited

human resources that cannot become slaves

to routine. Tools should be sufficiently

mature and optimized so as to reduce their

workload and allow them to focus on

higher value-added tasks”

(7)

“Our Mission is to create

value propositions for our

clients and commit to

their effective

implantation.

Our goal is to exceed

client expectations,

becoming their trusted

partners.”

Leading business consulting services firm

Services

Strategy

Sales and Marketing

Management

Financial Information

Risk Management and Control

Transformation: Organization

and Processes

New Technologies

Industries

Financial Institutions

Energy

Telecommunications

Europe Madrid, Barcelona, Bilbao, London, Frankfurt,Warsaw, Zurich, Milan, Lisbon

Americas

New York, San Juan de Puerto Rico, Mexico City, Bogota, Sao Paulo, Lima, Buenos Aires, Santiago de Chile

Asia Beijing

Management Solutions is an international and independent consulting firm whose core mission is to deliver business, risk, financial, organization and process-related advisory services, targeted at both functional aspects and the

implementation of related technologies.

Management Solutions has a multidisciplinary workforce of over 1,700

professionals bringing together business-oriented, mathematical, technical and systems integration skills, and operates through 18 offices (nine in Europe, eight in the Americas and one in Asia).

Our key differentiating strength lies in our in-depth knowledge of our clients’ businesses and our high level of industry and functional specialization.

To better meet our clients’ needs, our practice is structured by industry and line of activity, covering a broad spectrum of competencies.

For further information please contact:

Raúl García de Blas

Operational Risk Management Practice Partner [email protected]

Eduardo Pérez-Hickman

Operational Risk Management Practice Partner [email protected]

(8)

© Management Solutions. 2015

All rights reserved

All rights reserved. Cannot be reproduced, distributed, publicly disclosed, converted, totally or partially, freely or with a charge, in any way or procedure, without the express written authorization of Management Solutions.

The information contained in this publication is merely to be used as a guideline. Management Solutions shall not be held responsible for the use which could be made of this information by third parties. Nobody is entitled to use this material except by express authorization of Management Solutions.

Madrid Barcelona Bilbao London Frankfurt Warszawa Zürich Milano Lisboa Beijing

New York San Juan

de Puerto Rico

México D.F. Bogotá São Paulo Lima Santiago de Chile Buenos Aires

References

Related documents

A remarkable feature of the portfolio insurance strategy is the constant amount of required economic risk capital as measured by value-at-risk and conditional value-at- risk as long

Using copulas, we examine the impact of dependence structure between market risk and underwriting risk of insurance portfolio on the insurer’s economic capital, particularly

The usability of a variance swap contract for a property insurance portfolio will be in hedging the variance of realized CAT event losses to actual required reserve capital

To the extent that the capital and other solvency requirements for the insurance risk of protection sellers is lower due to the benefits of diversification than the operational

In the banking book, the Basel II capital requirement formula (IRB modeling) is based on the assumption that the portfolio is in- finitely fine grained; that is, it consists of a

The regulatory requirements relating to the calculation of the capital of insurance undertakings and the mandatory minimum solvency margin, which are contained in two Directives

In addition, large financial institutions, i.e. the largest and most globally active banks, were required to hold a greater amount of capital with an increase proportion of this Tier

Scenario analysis evaluates very specific and potentially severe OpRisk events and links them with the calculation of capital when limited internal loss data is available.. How-