• No results found

Pseudo Parsing Swift Answer Algorithm

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Pseudo Parsing Swift Answer Algorithm"

Copied!
6
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

P S E U D O P A R S I N G S W I F T - A N S W E R A L G O R I T H M b y

(c) S Pal Asija 19 8 9

Patent A t t o r n e y & Professional Engineer 7 W o o n s o c k e t Ave , Shelton, Conn. 0 6 4 8 4

PH: ( 2 0 3 ) - 7 3 6 - 9 9 3 4 or 7 3 6 - 0 7 7 4

I N T R O D U C T I O N

P s e u d o parsing S W I F T - A N S W E R algorithm is a subset of patented ( 4 , 270 , 182) S W I FT - A N W E R algorithm w h i c h is based on the firstpure software algorithm patent ever issued a n y w h e r e in the world. It is also a federal T r a d e m a r k registered in the principal register of the Unites States Patent a n d T r a d e m a r k Office. It isan a c r o n y m w h i c h stands for Special W o r d Index Full Tex t A 1 ph a N u m e r i c Storage W i t h Easy Retrieval. It is called P s e u d o parsing b e cause it deviates substantially f r o m conventional parsing algorithms, e v e n tho u g h itaccomplishes confusingly similar

objectives. It isnot a software p a c k a g e nor a key w o r d search system.

N O T A K E Y W O R D S Y S T E M

S o m e AI(Artificial Intelligence) experts a n d computational linguists h a v e erroneously perceived this s y s t e m as a k e y w o r d s y s t e m and

therefore h a v e evaluated a n d crticized itas such. But in reality it is not a k e y w o r d system. In fact the s y s t e m n e v e r asks the user for the r -ywords. K e y w o r d s if a n y are automatically created a n d m a n a g e d by this system. It is strictly internal to the s y s t e m a n d therefore completely transparent to the user.

Just as in h u ma n t o h u m a n c o m m u n i c a t i o n s in this h u ma n / ma c h i n e c o m m u n i c a t i o n s y s t e m also, neither the m a c h i n e nor the h u m a n being is conscious of a n y k e y w o r d s . W h e n yo u ask a h u m a n being a question he or she does not ask y o u for k e y words, e v e n t ho ugh the r e s p o n d a n t m a y subconsciously select a n d use s o m e k e y w o r d s to properly r e s p o n d to you. Just as the user does not care w h a t the subconscious of the r e s p o n d a n t does , the user also does not care w h a t the internal software of the s y s t e m does to properly r e s p o n d to the users c o m m u n i c a t i o n s .

B R I E F D E S C R I P T I O N OF T H E D R A W I N G

a) Figure 1 s h o w s the p r o g r a m flow chart of the S W I F T - A N S W E R algorithm.

b) Figure 2 s h o w s the S W I F T - A N S W E R Data Flo D i a g r a m .

(2)

c) Figure 3 s h o w s three p e r f o r m a n c e curves as follows.

(i)Figre 3 (A) m a p s size of the polarizeddata base as a

percentage of the original data base alng the Y axis as the structure of the data base is varied f r o m fully structured to free f o r m along the X axis for a constant data base size.

(ii) Figure 3 (B) m a p s size of the polarized data base along the Y axis as a function of the size of the original data base along the x axis for a

data base of contstant structure.

(ill) Figure 3 (C) s h o w s access time a b o v e a certain threshold is i n d e p e n d e n t of the size of the original data base.

P S E U D O - P A R S I N G A L G O R I T H M

T h e P s e u d o - p a r s i n g S W I F T - A N S W E R algorithm of this invention c o m p r i s e s the -following steps.

a) Separation of a natural language text into senteneces , phrases and words.

b) Separation of W o r d s into non-context an d context words.

c) Separation of non-context w o r d s into noise w o r d s such as p r o n o u n s a n d prepositions a n d c o m m o n w o r d s such as C o m m o n w o r d s a p p e a r i n g too frequently in a file or data base.

d) Alphabetizing all context words.

e) M a p p i n g f r e q u e n c y a n d location of all non-contex t w o r d s with respect to source data original files.

NOTE: T h e a b o v e m e n t i o n e d five steps of the P s e u d o parsing

al gorithm are applied to the natural l a n g u a g e unstructred files in the batch m o d e a n d then again to the s p o n t a n e o u s convoluted questions in the real time m o d e .

f) p e r f o r m i n g m a t h e m a t i c a l operations such as taking highest

c o m m o n factor a n d lowest c o m m o n mu ltiple of the statistical information that c o r r e p o n d s to context w o r d s in the question.

(3)

Note: This step in turn generates a lsitof prioritized a n s w e r w h i c h specified that the best a n s w e r based u p o n the totality of this question begins on disc so a n d so , sec to r so a n d so a n d is so m a n y bytes long and the second best a n s w e r begins on disc so a n d so, sector so and so a nd is so m a n y bytes l o n g a n d soon.

g) applying the user transparent boolean logic to different p e r m u t a t i o n s a n d combinations of the c o n t e x t w o r d s in the question.

NOTE: T h e p s e u d o parsing i s c o m p l e t e d at this step. T h e r e m a i n i n g steps described in the patent deal with fetching a n d presenting the right a n s w e r in the right f ormat to the user.

U N I Q U E A L G 0 R I_T H M

T h e algorithm i s u n i q u e c o m p a r e d to the prior art b e c a u s e itisthe only software that r e s p o n d s to a users e r r o n e o u s s p o n t a n e o u s questions primarily b e cause it p e r f o r m s the following user transparent functions automatically.

a) A u t o m a t i c LIUs (Logical Information Units) b) A u t o m a t i c & Unlimited Dictionary.

c) A u t o m a t i c K e y W o r d s d) A u t o m a t i c Boolean Logic

e) A u t o m a t i c Prioritizing of A n s w e r s f) A u t o m a t i c Fault Tolerance

g) A u t o m a t i c Context Deter m i n a t i o n .

h) A u t o m a t i c D B M ( D a t a B a s e M a n a g e m e n t )

Th e following functions a n d features are not automated.

a) Questions & R e f r a m i n g of questions b) Interpretation of A n s w e r s

c) Specification of the U S E R e n v i r o n m e n t

d) Creation of the Un s t r u c t u r e d Source Data Base e) Selection of Special Features

f) Inputting of additional context de pe nda n t c o m m o n w o r d s a nd ' s y n o n y m s & a n t o n y m s ' i e s e a r c h o n y m s .

(4)

This u n i q u e algorithm creates the illusion of artificial intelligence without e v e n using a conventional "Spell-Check” dictionary let alone s p o o n feeding rules of parsing, g r a m m a r , p r o g r a m m i n g and k n o w l e d g e of the world. T h e artificial intelligence if a n y in this s y s t e m is inherent in the structure of the algorithm w h i c h m a k e s it ind e pe nd en t of the k n o w l e d g e d o m a n i n of the data base.

F I V E P A H S E A L G O R IT H M

a) Installation phase during w h i c h the c o m p u t e r asks you a series of q ues t ions to get t o k n o w your c o m p u t e r e n v i r o n m e n t an d your

applicational n e e d s including your data bases , so that itcan load appropriate operating s y s t e m , interface mod ul es a n d drivers.

b) Batch P h a s e during w h i c h the algorithm pre-processes each file specified in phase (a) a n d extracts certain things f r o m them.

c) Real T i m e P h a s e during w h i c h the s a m e algorithm is applied to the question as w a s applied to the files in p h a s e (b).

d) Priority phase during w h i c h the prioritizing algorithm ranks all possible a n s w e r s without going to the data base files.

e) Presentation P h a s e during w h i c h the algorithm presents a n s w e r s in the order established in the priority p h a s e (a) s u pra by fetching t h e m f r o m the original files.

P O W E R F U L A L G O R I T H M

T h e p o w e r of the algorithm can be traced to the following precepts a n d principles.

a) All natural languages saturate. As a language saturates a n d the data base g r o w s larger the probability of a n e w w o r d a p p e a r i n g goes d o w n a n d the proabability of a repeat w o r d goes up. T h e length of the index does

not increase although v o l u m e of cross-indexing does.

b) S o m e w o r d s such as m o s t p r o n o u n s a n d propositions do not m e a n m u c h e v e n to people let alone c o m p u t e r s

(5)

SW

IFT

-ANS

WER

D

A

TA

FL

O

W

D

IA

G

R

A

M

Cl 2 3

9

i I

£ it

2 a

2

(6)

c) H C F (Highest C o m m o n Factors) a n d L C M (Least C o m m o n Multiple) of all data across dictionary w o r d s w h i c h the c o m p u t e r has not been p r e ­ told as m e a n i n g l e s s to h u m a n beings f r o m the question contain valuable information.

d) Prioritizing sub-algorithm is based on hierarchical relevence of decreasing order. M o s t relevent being the shortest L I U containing all w o r d s of the question m o s t n u m b e r of times closest together. T h e algorithm c o m p u t e s a n d gives starting access location an d length.

e) Faul t tolerance b y left a n d right shift with an d without addition of d u m m y characters a n d deletion of characters . T h e extent being

proportional to the size of the wo r d a n d the degree of fault tolerance specified by the user in phase (a) in para 14 supra.

f ) T h e p o w e r of Binary Search a n d Boolean logic can be m a d e user transparent.

g) Everything people type or put on a m a c h i n e readable m e d i a p r o b a b l y m e a n s s o m e t h i n g to t h e m notwithstanding l i v e l y d e m o given s o m e t i m e s by the inventor.

h) S y n o n y m s a n d a n t o n y m s both refer to the s a m e contevt.

i) V o n - N e u m a n n serial c o m p u t e r is no m a t c h for the parallel processing brain w h i c h is not too well u n d e r s t o o d to begin with. .

j ) M o s t w o r d s i n m o s t data bases a n d con c o m i t a n t software are spelled correctly.

k) Its naive to think that k n o w l e d g e engineers can s p o o n f e e d k n o w l e d g e of the universe to the computer.

100%

FULLY STRUCTURE FREE SIZE O F O RIGIN AL DATA BASE SIZE O F O RIG IN AL DATA BASE STRUCTURED FORM

Figure 3

Figure

Figure 3-447-

References

Related documents

Percent of humeral head anterior to scapular line (PHHA), glenoid version, coracoscapular angles, and coracoscapular and coracohumeral distances were significantly lower for

ART: antiresorptive treatment; BMD: bone mineral density; BMI: body mass index; DXA: dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry; GLM: General Linear Model; GQOL: global quality of life;

4) At 4- and 12-month follow-up, changes in the sec- ondary outcomes VAS pain, global disease activity, gen- eric and disease specific functioning and disability (measured by

As no questionnaires are available in the Dutch lan- guage to determine preoperative expectations of patients on a waiting list for total hip or knee arthroplasty, the first aim of

As the result of the current study showing that distance on longitudinal axis between the weighted center and the geometric center of the nucleus pulposus in Pfirrmann Grade II

reported a subluxa- tion/reluxation rate of 13% (six of 45 operated knees) in an average follow-up examination period of 13.5 years, where 14 patients and 15 Roux-Elmslie-Trillat

Some studies have shown an increased occurrence of signs and symptoms of entrapment neuropathies, mainly carpal tunnel syndrome, in occupations involving the use of vibrating

The specific aims of these experiments were [1] to determine the degree of fit of a newly defined function to the load-deflection data of SMS and the degree of linear fit over the