• No results found

Guide to the Vascular Flora of Picture Creek Diabase Barrens (Granville County, North Carolina).

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Guide to the Vascular Flora of Picture Creek Diabase Barrens (Granville County, North Carolina)."

Copied!
643
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

ABSTRACT

STANLEY, JENNIFER SARAH. Guide to the Vascular Flora of Picture Creek Diabase Barrens (Granville County, North Carolina). (Under the direction of Alexander Krings).

Picture Creek Diabase Barrens (PCDB) is a biologically unique area located in the northeastern Piedmont of North Carolina in Granville County. Designated a “Nationally Significant” natural area by the NC Natural

(2)

© Copyright 2013 by Jennifer Sarah Stanley

(3)

Guide to the Vascular Flora of Picture Creek Diabase Barrens (Granville County, North Carolina)

by

Jennifer Sarah Stanley

A thesis submitted to the Graduate Faculty of North Carolina State University

in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of

Master of Science

Plant Biology

Raleigh, North Carolina 2013

APPROVED BY:

____________________________ _____________________________ Dr. Jon M. Stucky Dr. Richard R. Braham

________________________________ Dr. Alexander Krings

(4)

BIOGRAPHY

(5)

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

First of all, I would like to thank my advisor Dr. Alexander Krings for his patience, for answering my many questions, for his contagious enthusiasm about plants, and for never letting me get away with “new species” for a specimen. I would also like to thank my committee members: Dr. Jon Stucky, for teaching me how to identify graminoids; and Dr. Richard Braham, for his help with tree identification, especially the oaks!

I am grateful to the many botanists who have assisted me throughout this project: Dr. Warren Hauk for preforming genetic analysis to confirm Sceptridium jenmanii, Derick Poindexter for his help with Carex and Stachys, Michael Schafale for blowing my mind by telling me there is no Diabase Glade natural community at the site (just a glade on diabase), Bruce Sorrie for shedding light on the mysteries of Symphyotrichum, Dr. Alan Weakley for his amazing ability to identify vegetative fragments at a glance, Donna Wright for sharing tips and tricks of the trade, Dr. Jon Stucky for going through my hundreds of graminoid specimens, and Dr. Alexander Krings for help with Rubus and pretty much everything else.

I’d like to thank all the folks at the NC Natural Heritage Program, including Laura Gadd, John Finnegan,

Harry LeGrand, Suzanne Mason, and especially Misty Buchanan, who patiently taught me all I know about GIS and first told me about the plant biology masters program at NC State. Thanks also to Lesley Starke at the Plant Conservation Program for her help obtaining collection permits and her assistance in the field.

Thank you to David Schnake at the NCDA&CS for providing me with useful site information and forest data, and to Roberta Blue and Mark Smith at Progress Energy for explaining the powerline maintenance program. I very much appreciate the generous assistance of Dr. Layne Huiet at Duke and Carol Ann McCormick at UNC during my weeks of herbarium crawls.

To the technology lending staff at NCSU Libraries, thank you for loaning me a GPS unit for a really, really long time! And thank you also to the library GIS staff members for their help.

I’d like to thank all the wonderful folks in the plant biology department office, especially Sue Vitello for

keeping me on track and getting me through from start to finish. Thank you to my fellow floristics lab

members: Rachel Clark, Amanda Faucette, Kelly Hines, Lee Kimmel, Casie Reed, and Robert Thornhill, for all their help and support.

(6)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

LIST OF TABLES... v

LIST OF FIGURES... vi

LIST OF TERMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ... xxvi

INTRODUCTION ... 1

STRUCTURE AND METHODS ... 1

SPECIES LIST ... 1

TAXONOMY... 2

KEYS ... 2

TAXON ENTRIES ... 3

STUDY AREA ... 4

LOCATION ... 4

HISTORY AND LAND USE ... 4

CLIMATE ... 6

GEOLOGY ... 6

SOILS ... 7

PLANT COMMUNITITES ... 9

PIEDMONT PRAIRIES... 9

NATURAL COMMUNITY TYPES ... 11

FLORISTIC SUMMARY ... 18

KEYS TO THE MAJOR VASCULAR PLANT GROUPS ... 1

REFERENCES ... 232

APPENDICES ... 254

(7)

LIST OF TABLES

Table 1. All North Carolina Significantly Rare and Watch List taxa collected or reported from Picture Creek Diabase Barrens. ... 277

Table 2. Guidelines for estimating the relative abundance of each taxon collected at Picture Creek Diabase Barrens by the present author. ... 280 Table 3. Characteristics of Piedmont and Midwestern Prairies ... 280 Table 4. Number of taxa reported or collected from within 2 km of Picture Creek Diabase Barrens ... 281

(8)

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 1. Map of Picture Creek Diabase Barrens SNHA (delimited by yellow boundary) showing the locations of utility corridors, roads, major access roads, electrical transmission towers, and other site components

referred to in this document ... 283

Figure 2. Collecting trips made to Picture Creek Diabase Barrens between October 2010 and July 2013 ... 284

Figure 3. Maps representing approximately 50–75% of the collection points (A) and routes traveled (B) during this project ... 285

Figure 4. Location of Picture Creek Diabase Barrens within the Triassic basin of NC ... 285

Figure 5. Aerial photographs of Picture Creek Diabase Barrens showing changes in the landscape over a 70 year period ... 286

Figure 6. View of the burned powerline cut in late March 2012, facing southwest ... 287

Figure 7. Echinacea laevigata and Marshallia legrandii coming up in mid-May among dead tree sapplings following the burning of a small woodland glade near the junction of the western access road and the powerline cut ... 287

Figure 8. Four examples of species that were significantly more abundant after the burn than before. (Clockwise from top left) Silphium terebinthinaceum (September), Lithospermum canadense (April), Zephyranthes atamasca (April), and Geranium maculatum (April) ... 288

Figure 9. Walter climate diagram for the closest weather station (Raleigh-Durham Airport) to Picture Creek Diabase Barrens ... 289

Figure 10. Tracks of the 44 tropical depressions (TD), tropical storms (TS) and hurricanes (H) that have tracked within a 120 km (75 mi) radius (gray circle) of Butner, NC since 1854 ... 289

Figure 11. Exposed diabase bedrock in Picture Creek ... 290

Figure 12. Rounded diabase boulders scattered around Picture Creek Diabase Barrens ... 291

Figure 13. Iron concretions (“pea gravel”) on the soil surface at Picture Creek Diabase Barrens ... 292

Figure 14. Drying of high shrink-swell clay soils causes cracks to develop ... 292

Figure 15. Soil map (Soil Survey Staff 2013) with soil core profiles and sampled locations ... 293

Figure 16. Example profiles and landscape positions of the four soil types at Picture Creek Diabase Barrens ... ... 294

(9)

Figure 18. Natural community types at Picture Creek Diabase Barrens... 296

Figure 19. The relationship among community types at Picture Creek Diabase Barrens and similar communities ... 297

Figure 20. Venn diagram showing the taxa reported and/or vouchered from Picture Creek Diabase Barrens or within 2 km of the site ... 298

Figure 21. The total number of taxa and the largest families within each of the four main plant groups at Picture Creek Diabase Barrens ... 299

Figure 22. Taxa at Picture Creek Diabase Barrens grouped by primary growth habit ... 300

Figure 23. Asplenium platyneuron (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 301

Figure 24. Woodwardia areolata (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 301

Figure 25. Dennstaedtia punctilobula (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 302

Figure 26. Pteridium aquilinum (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 302

Figure 27. Polystichum acrostichoides (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 303

Figure 28. Equisetum arvense (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 303

Figure 29. Equisetum hyemale (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 304

Figure 30. Onoclea sensibilis var. sensibilis (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 304

Figure 31. Botrypus virginianus (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 305

Figure 32. Ophioglossum pycnostichum (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 305

Figure 33. Sceptridium dissectum (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 306

Figure 34. Sceptridium jenmanii (Photo by Jennifer Stanley) ... 306

Figure 35. Osmundastrumcinnamomeum (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 307

Figure 36. Thelypteris noveboracensis (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 307

Figure 37. Juniperusvirginiana (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 308

Figure 38. Pinusechinata (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 308

Figure 39. Pinustaeda (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 309

Figure 40. Pinus virginiana (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 309

Figure 41. Alisma subcordatum (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 310

Figure 42. Echinodoruscordifolius (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 310

Figure 43. Allium canadense (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 311

Figure 44. Allium cernuum (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 311

Figure 45. Alliumvineale (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 312

Figure 46. Nothoscordum bivalve (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 312

(10)

Figure 48. Arisaema pusillum (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 313

Figure 49. Arisaematriphyllum (USDA-NRCS 2011) ... 314

Figure 50. Lemna minor (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 314

Figure 51. Spirodelapolyrhiza (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 315

Figure 52. Wolffia brasiliensis (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 315

Figure 53. Wolffiacolumbiana (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 316

Figure 54. Uvularia perfoliata (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 316

Figure 55. Uvularia sessilifolia (Britton & Brown 1913)... 317

Figure 56. Commelinacommunis (USDA-NRCS 2011) ... 317

Figure 57. Murdanniakeisak (USDA-NRCS 2011) ... 318

Figure 58. Bulbostyliscapillaris (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 318

Figure 59. Carexamphibola (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 319

Figure 60. Carexannectens (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 319

Figure 61. Carex blanda (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 320

Figure 62. Carex caroliniana (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 320

Figure 63. Carex cephalophora (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 321

Figure 64. Carexcrinita (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 321

Figure 65. Carexfestucacea (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 322

Figure 66. Carexflaccosperma (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 322

Figure 67. Carex frankii (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 323

Figure 68. Carexintumescens (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 323

Figure 69. Carex laxiflora (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 324

Figure 70. Carexlurida (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 324

Figure 71. Carex meadii Dewey (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 325

Figure 72. Carex oxylepis (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 325

Figure 73. Carex seorsa Howe (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 326

Figure 74. Carex squarrosa (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 326

Figure 75. Carextyphina (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 327

Figure 76. Carex willdenowii (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 327

Figure 77. Cyperus echinatus (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 328

Figure 78. Cyperuserythrorhizos (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 328

Figure 79. Cyperus esculentus (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 329

(11)

Figure 81. Cyperusretrorsus (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 330

Figure 82. Cyperusstrigosus (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 330

Figure 83. Eleocharisobtusa (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 331

Figure 84. Eleocharis tenuis (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 331

Figure 85. Fimbristylis annua (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 332

Figure 86. Fimbristylisautumnalis (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 332

Figure 87. Kyllinga pumila (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 333

Figure 88. Rhynchospora glomerata (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 333

Figure 89. Rhynchospora recognita (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 334

Figure 90. Scirpuscyperinus (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 334

Figure 91. Scirpus georgianus (USDA-NRCS 2013) ... 335

Figure 92. Scirpus pendulus (USDA-NRCS 2013) ... 335

Figure 93. Scleria ciliata (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 336

Figure 94. Scleriaoligantha (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 336

Figure 95. Scleriapauciflora (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 337

Figure 96. Scleriatriglomerata (Britton & Brown 1913)... 337

Figure 97. Dioscoreavillosa (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 338

Figure 98. Ornithogalum umbellatum (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 338

Figure 99. Hypoxishirsuta (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 339

Figure 100. Sisyrinchium angustifolium (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 339

Figure 101. Sisyrinchium mucronatum (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 340

Figure 102. Juncus acuminatus (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 340

Figure 103. Juncus biflorus (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 341

Figure 104. Juncus bufonius (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 341

Figure 105. Juncuscoriaceus (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 342

Figure 106. Juncusdichotomus (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 342

Figure 107. Juncuseffusus (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 343

Figure 108. Juncusscirpoides (Britton & Brown 1913)... 343

Figure 109. Juncustenuis (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 344

Figure 110. Erythronium umbilicatum (Photo by Jennifer Stanley) ... 344

Figure 111. Corallorhiza odontorhiza (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 345

Figure 112. Cypripediumacaule (USDA-NRCS 2011; photo by Jennifer Stanley) ... 345

(12)

Figure 114. Liparis liliifolia (Photo by Jennifer Stanley) ... 346

Figure 115. Malaxisunifolia (Britton & Brown 1913; photo by Jennifer Stanley) ... 347

Figure 116. Spiranthes cernua (Photo by Jennifer Stanley) ... 347

Figure 117. Spiranthes tuberosa (Photo by Jennifer Stanley) ... 348

Figure 118. Tipulariadiscolor (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 348

Figure 119. Agrostishyemalis (Britton & Brown 1913)... 349

Figure 120. Agrostisperennans (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 349

Figure 121. Aira caryophyllea (Hitchcock 1950) ... 350

Figure 122. Aira elegans (Hitchcock 1950) ... 350

Figure 123. Alopecurus carolinianus (USDA-NRCS 2013) ... 351

Figure 124. Andropogongerardii (Hitchcock 1950) ... 351

Figure 125. Andropogon gyrans (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 352

Figure 126. Andropogonternarius (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 352

Figure 127. Andropogonvirginicus (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 353

Figure 128. Anthoxanthum odoratum (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 353

Figure 129. Aristida dichotoma (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 354

Figure 130. Aristida oligantha (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 354

Figure 131. Aristida purpurascens (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 355

Figure 132. Arthraxon hispidus (USDA-NRCS 2013) ... 355

Figure 133. Chasmanthiumlatifolium (USDA-NRCS 2011) ... 356

Figure 134. Chasmanthiumlaxum (USDA-NRCS 2011) ... 356

Figure 135. Cinnaarundinacea (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 357

Figure 136. Coleataenia anceps (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 357

Figure 137. Coleataenia rigidulum (USDA-NRCS 2011) ... 358

Figure 138. Cynodondactylon (Hitchcock 1950) ... 358

Figure 139. Dactylisglomerata (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 359

Figure 140. Danthoniasericea (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 359

Figure 141. Danthoniaspicata (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 360

Figure 142. Dichanthelium acuminatum (USDA-NRCS 2013) ... 360

Figure 143. Dichanthelium boreale (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 361

Figure 144. Dichanthelium boscii (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 361

Figure 145. Dichanthelium clandestinum (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 362

(13)

Figure 147. Dichanthelium depauperatum (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 363

Figure 148. Dichantheliumdichotomum (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 363

Figure 149. Dichanthelium ensifolium (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 364

Figure 150. Dichantheliumlaxiflorum (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 364

Figure 151. Dichanthelium oligosanthes (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 365

Figure 152. Dichantheliumpolyanthes (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 365

Figure 153. Dichantheliumscoparium (USDA-NRCS 2011) ... 366

Figure 154. Dichantheliumsphaerocarpon (Hitchcock 1950) ... 366

Figure 155. Dichantheliumvillosissimum (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 367

Figure 156. Digitariaischaemum (Hitchcock 1950) ... 367

Figure 157. Digitariasanguinalis (Hitchcock 1950) ... 368

Figure 158. Echinochloacolonum (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 368

Figure 159. Echinochloacrusgalli (USDA-NRCS 2011) ... 369

Figure 160. Echinochloamuricata (USDA-NRCS 2011) ... 369

Figure 161. Elymus hystrix (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 370

Figure 162. Elymusvirginicus (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 370

Figure 163. Eragrostis pectinacea (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 371

Figure 164. Eragrostis spectabilis (USDA-NRCS 2013) ... 371

Figure 165. Festucaparadoxa (Hitchcock 1950) ... 372

Figure 166. Festucasubverticillata (USDA-NRCS 2011) ... 372

Figure 167. Gymnopogon ambiguus (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 373

Figure 168. Hordeumpusillum (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 373

Figure 169. Leersiaoryzoides (Hitchcock 1950) ... 374

Figure 170. Leersiavirginica (Hitchcock 1950) ... 374

Figure 171. Melica mutica (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 375

Figure 172. Microstegiumvimineum (USDA-NRCS 2011) ... 375

Figure 173. Muhlenbergia capillaris (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 376

Figure 174. Muhlenbergia schreberi (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 376

Figure 175. Muhlenbergia tenuiflora (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 377

Figure 176. Panicum capillare (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 377

Figure 177. Panicumdichotomiflorum (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 378

Figure 178. Panicum flexile (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 378

(14)

Figure 180. Paspalumdilatatum (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 379

Figure 181. Paspalumfloridanum (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 380

Figure 182. Paspalum laeve (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 380

Figure 183. Paspalumnotatum (Hitchcock 1950) ... 381

Figure 184. Piptochaetiumavenaceum (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 381

Figure 185. Poaannua (Britton & Brown 1913)... 382

Figure 186. Poaautumnalis (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 382

Figure 187. Saccharum alopecuroides (Britton & Brown 1913)... 383

Figure 188. Saccharum brevibarbe (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 383

Figure 189. Schedonorusarundinaceus (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 384

Figure 190. Schizachyriumscoparium (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 384

Figure 191. Setaria faberi (Hitchcock 1950) ... 385

Figure 192. Setariaparviflora (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 385

Figure 193. Setariapumila (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 386

Figure 194. Sorghastrumnutans (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 386

Figure 195. Sorghumhalepense (Hitchcock 1950) ... 387

Figure 196. Sphenopholis obtusata (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 387

Figure 197. Sporobolus vaginiflorus (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 388

Figure 198. Steinchismahians (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 388

Figure 199. Tridensflavus (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 389

Figure 200. Tripsacum dactyloides (Photo by Jennifer Stanley) ... 389

Figure 201. Vulpia myuros (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 390

Figure 202. Vulpiaoctoflora (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 390

Figure 203. Potamogeton diversifolius (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 391

Figure 204. Potamogeton foliosus (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 391

Figure 205. Maianthemum racemosum (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 392

Figure 206. Polygonatum biflorum (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 392

Figure 207. Smilaxbona-nox (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 393

Figure 208. Smilaxglauca (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 393

Figure 209. Smilax herbacea (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 394

Figure 210. Smilaxrotundifolia (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 394

Figure 211. Typhalatifolia (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 395

(15)

Figure 213. Ruellia humilis (Photos by Jennifer Stanley) ... 396

Figure 214. Sambucus canadensis (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 396

Figure 215. Viburnum dentatum (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 397

Figure 216. Viburnumprunifolium (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 397

Figure 217. Liquidambarstyraciflua (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 398

Figure 218. Rhus aromatica (Photo by Jennifer Stanley) ... 398

Figure 219. Rhuscopallinum (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 399

Figure 220. Rhusglabra (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 399

Figure 221. Toxicodendron pubescens (Britton & Brown 1913)... 400

Figure 222. Toxicodendronradicans (USDA-NRCS 2013) ... 400

Figure 223. Asiminatriloba (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 401

Figure 224. Angelica venenosa (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 401

Figure 225. Chaerophyllum procumbens (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 402

Figure 226. Daucus carota L. (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 402

Figure 227. Eryngium yuccifolium (USDA-NRCS 2013; photo by Jennifer Stanley) ... 403

Figure 228. Sanicula marilandica (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 403

Figure 229. Thaspium trifoliatum (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 404

Figure 230. Zizia aptera (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 404

Figure 231. Zizia aurea (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 405

Figure 232. Amsonia tabernaemontana (USDA-NRCS 2013) ... 405

Figure 233. Apocynumcannabinum (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 406

Figure 234. Asclepias syriaca (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 406

Figure 235. Asclepiastuberosa (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 407

Figure 236. Asclepias verticillata (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 407

Figure 237. Asclepias viridiflora (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 408

Figure 238. Matelea carolinensis (Britton & Brown 1913; photo by Jennifer Stanley) ... 408

Figure 239. Matelea decipiens (Photo by Jennifer Stanley) ... 409

Figure 240. Thyrsanthella difformis (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 409

Figure 241. Vinca minor (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 410

Figure 242. Ilexdecidua (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 410

Figure 243. Ilexopaca (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 411

Figure 244. Ilexvomitoria (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 411

(16)

Figure 246. Hexastylis minor (Photo by Jennifer Stanley) ... 412

Figure 247. Achillea millefolium (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 413

Figure 248. Ageratina aromatica (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 413

Figure 249. Ambrosiaartemisiifolia (USDA-NRCS 2011) ... 414

Figure 250. Antennaria parlinii (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 414

Figure 251. Antennaria plantaginifolia (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 415

Figure 252. Anthemis arvensis (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 415

Figure 253. Bidensaristosa (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 416

Figure 254. Brickellia eupatorioides (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 416

Figure 255. Chrysogonum virginianum (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 417

Figure 256. Chrysopsismariana (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 417

Figure 257. Cichoriumintybus (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 418

Figure 258. Cirsiumhorridulum (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 418

Figure 259. Cirsium pumilum (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 419

Figure 260. Cirsium vulgare (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 419

Figure 261. Conocliniumcoelestinum (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 420

Figure 262. Coreopsis auriculata (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 420

Figure 263. Coreopsis major (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 421

Figure 264. Coreopsis tripteris (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 421

Figure 265. Echinacea laevigata (Photo by Jennifer Stanley) ... 422

Figure 266. Echinacea pallida (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 422

Figure 267. Ecliptaprostrata (USDA-NRCS 2011) ... 423

Figure 268. Elephantopuscarolinianus (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 423

Figure 269. Elephantopusnudatus (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 424

Figure 270. Elephantopustomentosus (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 424

Figure 271. Erechtiteshieraciifolius (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 425

Figure 272. Erigeronannuus (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 425

Figure 273. Erigeronstrigosus (USDA-NRCS 2011) ... 426

Figure 274. Eupatorium altissimum (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 426

Figure 275. Eupatoriumcapillifolium (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 427

Figure 276. Eupatoriumhyssopifolium (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 427

Figure 277. Eupatorium pubescens (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 428

(17)

Figure 279. Euthamiacaroliniana (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 429

Figure 280. Heleniumamarum (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 429

Figure 281. Heleniumautumnale (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 430

Figure 282. Helianthus atrorubens (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 430

Figure 283. Helianthus decapetalus (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 431

Figure 284. Helianthus divaricatus (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 431

Figure 285. Heliopsis helianthoides (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 432

Figure 286. Hieraciumgronovii (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 432

Figure 287. Hieracium venosum (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 433

Figure 288. Hypochaerisradicata (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 433

Figure 289. Krigiacespitosa (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 434

Figure 290. Krigia dandelion (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 434

Figure 291. Krigiavirginica (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 435

Figure 292. Lactuca canadensis (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 435

Figure 293. Leucanthemumvulgare (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 436

Figure 294. Liatris pilosa (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 436

Figure 295. Liatris squarrosa (Photo by Jennifer Stanley) ... 437

Figure 296. Liatris squarrulosa (Photo by Jennifer Stanley) ... 437

Figure 297. Marshallia legrandii (Photo by Jennifer Stanley) ... 438

Figure 298. Mikaniascandens (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 438

Figure 299. Packeraanonyma (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 439

Figure 300. Packera paupercula (Britton & Brown 1913)... 439

Figure 301. Parthenium auriculatum (Britton & Brown 1913; photo by Jennifer Stanley) ... 440

Figure 302. Plucheacamphorata (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 440

Figure 303. Pseudognaphaliumobtusifolium (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 441

Figure 304. Pyrrhopappuscarolinianus (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 441

Figure 305. Rudbeckia fulgida (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 442

Figure 306. Rudbeckiahirta (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 442

Figure 307. Rudbeckia laciniata (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 443

Figure 308. Sericocarpus asteroides (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 443

Figure 309. Silphium asteriscus (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 444

Figure 310. Silphium terebinthinaceum (Britton & Brown 1913; photo by Jennifer Stanley) ... 444

(18)

Figure 312. Solidago caesia (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 445

Figure 313. Solidago erecta (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 446

Figure 314. Solidago nemoralis (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 446

Figure 315. Solidago ptarmicoides (Britton & Brown 1913; photo by Jennifer Stanley) ... 447

Figure 316. Solidago rigida var. glabrata (Photo by Jennifer Stanley)... 447

Figure 317. Solidago rugosa (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 448

Figure 318. Sonchus asper (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 448

Figure 319. Symphyotrichum depauperatum (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 449

Figure 320. Symphyotrichum laeve var. concinnum (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 449

Figure 321. Symphyotrichumlanceolatum (USDA-NRCS 2011) ... 450

Figure 322. Symphyotrichumlateriflorum (USDA-NRCS 2011) ... 450

Figure 323. Symphyotrichum pilosum (USDA-NRCS 2013) ... 451

Figure 324. Taraxacumofficinale (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 451

Figure 325. Vernonia glauca (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 452

Figure 326. Vernonia noveboracensis (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 452

Figure 327. Podophyllumpeltatum (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 453

Figure 328. Betulanigra (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 453

Figure 329. Carpinuscaroliniana (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 454

Figure 330. Corylus americana (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 454

Figure 331. Ostryavirginiana (Britton & Brown 1913)... 455

Figure 332. Bignoniacarpreolata (USDA-NRCS 2011) ... 455

Figure 333. Campsisradicans (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 456

Figure 334. Lithospermum canescens (Britton & Brown 1913; photo by Jennifer Stanley) ... 456

Figure 335. Myosotis verna (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 457

Figure 336. Barbarea verna (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 457

Figure 337. Cardamine angustata (Photo by Jennifer Stanley)... 458

Figure 338. Cardamine douglassii (Britton & Brown 1913; photo by Jennifer Stanley) ... 458

Figure 339. Cardaminehirsuta (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 459

Figure 340. Cardamineparviflora (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 459

Figure 341. Cardamine pensylvanica (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 460

Figure 342. Lepidiumvirginicum (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 460

Figure 343. Lobeliacardinalis (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 461

(19)

Figure 345. Lobelianuttallii (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 462

Figure 346. Lobelia puberula (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 462

Figure 347. Lobelia spicata (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 463

Figure 348. Triodanisperfoliata (Britton & Brown 1913; photo by Jennifer Stanley) ... 463

Figure 349. Celtislaevigata (USDA-NRCS 2011) ... 464

Figure 350. Celtis occidentalis (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 464

Figure 351. Celtis tenuifolia (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 465

Figure 352. Lonicerajaponica (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 465

Figure 353. Lonicerasempervirens (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 466

Figure 354. Symphoricarpos orbiculatus (Britton & Brown 1913; photo by Jennifer Stanley) ... 466

Figure 355. Cerastium fontanum (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 467

Figure 356. Cerastiumglomeratum (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 467

Figure 357. Silene antirrhina (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 468

Figure 358. Silene virginica (Britton & Brown 1913; photo by Jennifer Stanley) ... 468

Figure 359. Euonymusamericanus (USDA-NRCS 2011) ... 469

Figure 360. Lechea racemulosa (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 469

Figure 361. Cuscuta pentagona (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 470

Figure 362. Ipomoeapandurata (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 470

Figure 363. Cornusamomum (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 471

Figure 364. Cornusflorida (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 471

Figure 365. Diospyrosvirginiana (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 472

Figure 366. Chimaphilamaculata (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 472

Figure 367. Eubotrysracemosa (Britton & Brown 1913; photo by Jennifer Stanley) ... 473

Figure 368. Monotropa uniflora (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 473

Figure 369. Oxydendrumarboreum (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 474

Figure 370. Rhododendron arborescens (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 474

Figure 371. Rhododendron periclymenoides (Britton & Brown 1913; photo by Jennifer Stanley) ... 475

Figure 372. Vacciniumfuscatum (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 475

Figure 373. Vaccinium pallidum (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 476

Figure 374. Vacciniumstamineum (USDA-NRCS 2011) ... 476

Figure 375. Vaccinium tenellum (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 477

Figure 376. Acalyphagracilens (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 477

(20)

Figure 378. Crotonglandulosus (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 478

Figure 379. Euphorbiacorollata (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 479

Figure 380. Euphorbiamaculata (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 479

Figure 381. Euphorbia nutans (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 480

Figure 382. Amphicarpaeabracteata (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 480

Figure 383. Baptisia australis var. aberrans (Photo by Jennifer Stanley)... 481

Figure 384. Centrosemavirginianum (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 481

Figure 385. Cerciscanadensis (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 482

Figure 386. Chamaecristafasciculata (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 482

Figure 387. Chamaecristanictitans (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 483

Figure 388. Clitoriamariana (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 483

Figure 389. Desmodium canescens (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 484

Figure 390. Desmodium glabellum (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 484

Figure 391. Desmodium laevigatum (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 485

Figure 392. Desmodiumlineatum (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 485

Figure 393. Desmodium marilandicum (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 486

Figure 394. Desmodiumpaniculatum (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 486

Figure 395. Desmodium rotundifolium (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 487

Figure 396. Hylodesmum nudiflorum (Britton & Brown 1913)... 487

Figure 397. Kummerowiastriata (USDA-NRCS 2011) ... 488

Figure 398. Lespedezacapitata (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 488

Figure 399. Lespedezahirta (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 489

Figure 400. Lespedezaprocumbens (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 489

Figure 401. Lespedezarepens (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 490

Figure 402. Lespedezaviolacea (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 490

Figure 403. Lespedeza virginica (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 491

Figure 404. Rhynchosiatomentosa (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 491

Figure 405. Robinia pseudoacacia (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 492

Figure 406. Strophostyles umbellata (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 492

Figure 407. Stylosanthes biflora (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 493

Figure 408. Trifolium campestre (Britton & Brown 1913)... 493

Figure 409. Trifoliumdubium (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 494

(21)

Figure 411. Vicia caroliniana (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 495

Figure 412. Vicia cracca (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 495

Figure 413. Viciasativa (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 496

Figure 414. Fagusgrandifolia (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 496

Figure 415. Quercuaalba (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 497

Figure 416. Quercus bicolor (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 497

Figure 417. Quercus coccinea (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 498

Figure 418. Quercusfalcata (USDA-NRCS 2011) ... 498

Figure 419. Quercuslaurifolia (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 499

Figure 420. Quercusmarilandica (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 499

Figure 421. Quercusmichauxii (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 500

Figure 422. Quercusphellos (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 500

Figure 423. Quercus rubra (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 501

Figure 424. Quercus shumardii (USDA-NRCS 2013) ... 501

Figure 425. Quercusstellata (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 502

Figure 426. Quercusvelutina (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 502

Figure 427. Gelsemiumsempervirens (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 503

Figure 428. Gentiana villosa (Britton & Brown 1913; photo by Jennifer Stanley) ... 503

Figure 429. Obolaria virginica (Britton & Brown 1913; photo by Jennifer Stanley) ... 504

Figure 430. Sabatia angularis (Photos by Jennifer Stanley) ... 504

Figure 431. Geranium carolinianum (Britton & Brown 1913; photo by Jennifer Stanley) ... 505

Figure 432. Geranium maculatum (Britton & Brown 1913; photo by Jennifer Stanley) ... 505

Figure 433. Hamamelis virginiana (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 506

Figure 434. Hypericum densiflorum (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 506

Figure 435. Hypericumgentianoides (USDA-NRCS 2011) ... 507

Figure 436. Hypericumhypericoides (USDA-NRCS 2011) ... 507

Figure 437. Hypericum mutilum (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 508

Figure 438. Hypericum prolificum (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 508

Figure 439. Hypericumpunctatum (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 509

Figure 440. Hypericum virgatum (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 509

Figure 441. Carya glabra (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 510

Figure 442. Caryaovata (Britton & Brown 1913) ... 510

(22)
(23)
(24)
(25)
(26)
(27)
(28)

LIST OF TERMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

A list of definitions for terminology used in this document. Refer to Figure 1 for information regarding the PCDB study site. “Reported taxa” are those taxa that have been previously reported from the site and refer to both vouchered and unvouchered reports. Carolina Power & Light, Progress Energy Carolinas, and Duke Energy Progress are all utility companies that have owned and managed the powerline right-of-way at PCDB since its establishment.

Burn unit [#] Refer to Figure 1

C Celcius

ca. Circa

ChA Chewacla-Wehadkee soil association

cm Centimeters

CrB/C Creedmoor soils (CrB and CrC) DBH Diameter at breast height DBOHF Dry Basic Oak-Hickory Forest DEN Denison University herbarium

DG Diabase glade

DMBOHF Dry-Mesic Basic Oak-Hickory Forest DOHF Dry Oak-Hickory Forest

DUKE Duke University herbarium

F Fahrenheit

FNA Flora of North America

Glade The portion of the powerline cut that contains the majority of the rare, threatened, and endangered species. While the terms “barren” or “Piedmont prairie” may be more accurate to describe this community, the term “glade” is widely used in referring to this site and will be used here for consistency.

GPS Global Positioning System

Graminoids Grasses (Poaceae), sedges (Cyperaceae), and rushes (Juncaceae).

in Inches

IrB Iredell soils

(29)

m Meters

Mafic Soils with high concentrations of magnesium and iron.

mi Miles

MMHF Mixed Moisture Hardpan Forest

NC North Carolina

NCDA&CS North Carolina Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services NCNHP North Carolina Natural Heritage Program

NCSC North Carolina State University herbarium

NCU University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill herbarium NOAA National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration PAF Piedmont Alluvial Forest

PcA Picture soils

PCDB Picture Creek Diabase Barrens PCP Plant Conservation Program

PBF(HS) Piedmont Bottomland Forest (High subtype) PBF(TLS) Piedmont Bottomland Forest (Typic Low subtype) PBG(TS) Piedmont Basic Glade (Typic subtype)

PHSF(HS) Piedmont Headwater Stream Forest (Hardpan subtype) PLF(TS) Piedmont Levee Forest (Typic sybtype)

P/MSI(PMS) Piedmont/Mountain Semipermanent Impoundment (Piedmont Marsh subtype) RAB Radford et al. (1986)

RDU Raleigh-Durham International Airport SNHA Significant Natural Heritage Area

Tower [#] See Figure 1 for location of electrical transmission towers.

US United States

USDA United States Department of Agriculture USF&WS United States Fish and Wildlife Service Vicinity All land within a 2 km radius of PCDB.

(30)

INTRODUCTION

Picture Creek Diabase Barrens (PCDB) is a Significant Natural Heritage Area (SNHA), rated by the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) as “Nationally Significant” with an “Outstanding” biodiversity rating (Schafale rev. Franklin 2005). LeGrand (1986) called PCDB “one of the most significant natural areas in the state”, and for good reason. This site, due to a combination of factors including past and present disturbance

regimes, unique soils, extreme hydrology, and unusual geology, is home to dozens of Significantly Rare and Watch List taxa (Table 1). These include, for example, ca. 40,000 flowering stems of the federally Endangered Echinacea laevigata (C.L. Boynton & Beadle) S.F. Blake (Lesley Starke, pers. comm.). An additional seven taxa are Endangered in North Carolina (NC) and five are Threatened in the state. PCDB also supports populations of three Federal Species of Concern and fourteen other taxa that are considered Significantly Rare in NC. Along with these thirty rare taxa, another eighteen taxa are on the NCNHP Watch List. While a variety of floristic surveys have been conducted at PCDB and at similar sites in the area, most of these efforts have been limited to glades and glade-like openings. Additionally, very few voucher specimens have been collected from the area. This project was undertaken to comprehensively inventory the PCDB flora and provide information for land managers and conservationists. The three primary objectives of this project were to (1) collect voucher specimens of the vascular flora at PCDB, (2) compile a comprehensive list of taxa collected and previously reported from PCDB and the vicinity (i.e., within 2 km of PCDB), and (3) create a guide to the flora including illustrations, taxonomic treatments, and keys for the identification of all taxa reported or collected from PCDB and the vicinity.

STRUCTURE AND METHODS

SPECIES LIST

(31)

To determine if any specimens had been previously collected within 2 km of PCDB, herbarium searches were conducted of the three likeliest herbaria to contain specimens from the site: Duke University (DUKE), North Carolina State University (NCSC), and the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (NCU). During these visits, every specimen collected in Granville County, NC was located and, if determined to have been collected within 2 km of PCDB, included in keys, taxonomic treatments, and analyses for this project. These herbarium searches located fifty-seven specimens collected within 2 km of PCDB.

Seventy-one collecting trips were made to PCDB between October 2010 and July 2013 (Figure 2). The primary objective of these visits was to collect all taxa present at the site. This involved walking the entire PCDB site. Each time a taxon was encountered that had not previously been collected by the author, a voucher specimen, including underground portions, was collected. Voucher specimens were deposited at NCSC. Where possible, digital photographs, geocoordinates, and duplicate vouchers were also collected, as well as leaf samples for the NCSC DNA bank. Geocoordinates were taken for approximately 80% of the specimens collected during this project using a handheld Garmin GPSMAP 60CSx unit The locations of another 10% were georeferenced by reference to a geographically identifiable feature or a centrally located GPS point. Geocoordinates are included on the specimen labels resulting from the project. In addition to collection points, the routes traveled during forty-six of the seventy-one trips were also tracked using GPS (Figure 3).

TAXONOMY

The taxonomic concepts and nomenclature used in this guide primarily follow Weakley (2012a) or salient treatments in the Flora of North America (Oxford University, Press), as cited. Natural community type concepts follow primarily Schafale (2012), with additional associated taxon information provided by Schafale and Weakley (1990). The following specialists provided assistance in confirming determinations: Richard Braham (NCSC; Celtis L., Quercus L.), Warren Hauk (DEN; Sceptridium jenmanii (Underw.) Lyon), Alexander Krings (NCSC; vascular plants excluding graminoids), Derick Poindexter (NCU; Carex

cephalophora Muhl. ex Willd., C. gracilescens Hartm. ex Andersson, C. granularis Muhl. ex Willd., C. pigra Naczi, C. planispicata Naczi), Bruce Sorrie (NCNHP; Symphyotrichum Nees), and Jon Stucky (NCSC; graminoids).

KEYS

(32)

families within that group and each family includes a key to its included genera. A key to specific and subspecific taxa is included. In some cases, one ore more of these keys may be absent. For instance, a family with only one genus and species may be keyed directly in the key to families. The major sectional groups are listed in phylogenetic order from earliest diverging to most recent. All other taxonomic groups are listed alphabetically within their taxonomic level.

Within the keys, the typical numerical ranges for morphological characters are listed, with extreme numerical values sometimes included in parentheses. For example, “Corolla 2–3(–4) mm long” indicates that

the typical corolla measures 2–3 mm in length, though examples measuring up to 4 mm have been encountered. An attempt has been made to minimize botanical jargon and increase the “user-friendliness” of the keys by

adding brief explanations in parentheses for some of the more technical terms.

TAXON ENTRIES

Following each genus, all taxa collected or reported from within 2 km of PCDB are listed and additional information for each taxon is provided. The taxonomic name and corresponding authority are listed for all species and subspecific taxa where appropriate. An asterisk (*) preceeding the name denotes non-native taxa, whereas the combination of an asterisk and a question mark (*?) indicates that the nativity status of the taxon is uncertain. Following Weakley (2012), native taxa are those believed to exist in the NC Piedmont prior to European settlement. Listed after each name is its synonomy as it corresponds to treatments in three of the major floras for the region: 1) Flora of North America (Oxford University Press; FNA), 2) Manual of the vascular flora of the Carolinas (Radford et al. 1968; RAB), and 3) Flora of the southern and mid-Atlantic states (Weakley 2012). Common names are also included as an additional aid for memory and identification and are based primarily on Weakley (2012). The rank and status of state or federally-listed taxa is included

(33)

not available, the herbarium accession number is listed. Each symbol included at the end of a taxon entry represents a specific source reporting that taxon at PCDB:  = Barnett-Lawrence (1994a),  = Lunsford (2002),  = Oakley et al. (1995),  = Walker (2009),  = LeGrand (1986) and Schafale rev. Franklin (2005),

and  = Peet et al. (2013). The symbols are also listed in the references section next to their corresponding source.

Taxon entries also include public domain illustrations by Britton and Brown (1913) when available, and photographs by the present author to further aid plant identification.

STUDY AREA

LOCATION

Picture Creek Diabase Barrens (407.35 acres) is located in southwestern Granville County in the

northeastern Piedmont of NC (Figure 4). The site lies just north of Butner and west of interstate 85. Located in the upper Neuse River watershed (Koch 1967) on generally flat terrain, the elevation of PCDB ranges from 94–

116 m (310–380 ft) above sea level. A gas line and adjacent railroad line define the eastern border of PCDB

while the western boundary follows Picture Creek. To the south, the boundary is generally marked by a sewer line and an industrial complex. The site extends approximately 1.5 km to the northern boundary which follows an access road and a small portion of Otha Mangum Road (Schafale rev. Franklin 2005; Figure 1).

PCDB is part of the Umstead Research Farm Unit managed by the NCDA&CS Research Stations Division and the powerline cut is leased by Duke Energy Progress (Schafale rev. Franklin 2005; David Schnake, pers. comm.). While the site itself is not being actively managed for timber, the NCDA&CS lands west of Picture Creek have been recently clear-cut.

HISTORY AND LAND USE

(34)

Superconducting Supercollider (Super Collider Site Evaluation Committee 1988). This prompted the NCNHP to conduct surveys of the area, which revealed many rare, threatened, and endangered species. These

discoveries were a contributing factor in the decision to remove the proposed location from consideration (Noss 2012). In 1986, the PCDB SNHA was established, encompassing 540 acres (LeGrand 1986, Schafale rev. Franklin 2005).

In the winter of 1993, the western access road was cleared and the northern access road was cleared and planted with annual wildlife food (Barnett-Lawrence 1994b). During the late summer and fall of 1993, five long-term study plots were permanently established at PCDB to monitor Echinacea laevigata.

PCDB is divided into four management units (burn units). Unit 1 was burned in April 1994 and in February 1995 unit 2 was burned. Unit 4 was burned in February 1996 and a burn of unit 3 was planned for April 1995 but did not happen due to dry conditions unsuitable for a prescribed burn (Barnett-Lawrence 1994b; Lunsford 2002).

Based on aerial photos (Figure 5), the industrial complex adjacent to what is currently the southern boundary of PCDB, was built sometime between 1993 and 1998. Unfortunately, this facility was built on the southern portion of PCDB, destroying 25% of the site and reducing its total acreage to the present 407.35 acres (Schafale rev. Franklin 2005). The sewer line forming the southern border of PCDB was also established in the mid 1990s.

(35)

The gas line and sewer line were each mowed multiple times throughout the duration of this project. In June 2013 the natural levee of the marsh impoundment was breached and the water had drained almost completely following several weeks of record-setting rainfall.

CLIMATE

Climate data for PCDB were obtained from the KRDU weather station at Raleigh-Durham International Airport, located approximately 31.1 km (19.3 mi) south of PCDB (NOAA 2013). Data from 1981–2010 are summarized in Error! Reference source not found.. The climate in this area is generally mild, with average daily maximum temperatures ranging from around 10.5°C (51°F) in January to 32.3°C (90°F) in July. The average daily minimum temperature during the coldest month of the year is just below freezing at -0.5°C (31°F; NOAA 2013). The first freezing temperatures of the season in Granville County usually occur around the last week of October while the last freezing temperatures are typically recorded around the first week of April (Soil Survey Staff 2011). As a result of mild winter temperatures, plants can be found in bloom every month of the year.

Average annual precipitation is 110.1 cm (43.34 in). Precipitation is fairly evenly distributed throughout the year with a slight increase during the summer months (Soil Survey Staff 2011). This seasonal increase in rainfall is primarily caused by the frequent thunderstorms and occasional hurricanes that affect the region (NOAA 2013). Since 1854, at least fourty-four tropical depressions, tropical storms, and hurricanes have tracked with 120 km (75 mi) of PCDB (CSC 2013; ). This means that on average, a tropical cyclone occurs in the area every 3–4 years. In addition to these large-scale storm events, thirty-eight tornadoes were reported in the Raleigh-Durham area between 1950–2011 (Forbes 2012). Ice storms also occur periodically in this region of the Piedmont. These storms can cause significant or even crippling accumulations of ice which can severly damage trees over large areas.

GEOLOGY

(36)

As the Triassic basins were forming, deep vertical fissures began to appear in the bedrock. These fractures allowed basaltic magma to intrude into the upper layers of the earth’s surface. These vertical intrusions are

called dikes while horizontal intrusions of magma through layers of sediments are refered to as sills. The magma creating these dikes and sills cooled relatively quickly near the surface, forming a medium-grained igneous rock called diabase (Oakley et al. 1995; Stewart and Roberson 2007). Virtually the entire PCDB site lies atop one of these diabase sills (Bain and Harvey 1977; Burt et al. 1978), which is estimated to extend approximately 20 m in depth (Koch 1967). Picture Creek carved a deep channel along the western side of the diabase sill underlying PCDB. The creek followed a path of least resistance, cutting through the more easily eroded Triassic sediments surrounding the sill. Being more resistant to erosion than the surrounding sediments, diabase sills are often found underlying flat uplands. In some places along Picture Creek, the channel has carved down to the edge of the sill, exposing the diabase bedrock (Figure 11Error! Reference source not found.). Rounded diabase can be found scattered through the forest and in more concentrated numbers in creeks and streams (Koch 1967; Burt et al. 1978; Oakley et al. 1995; Figure 12). These boulders represent portions of the diabase parent material that are most resistant to weathering (Batson 1952). Small, black, pellet-like iron concretions, or “pea-gravel”, often litter the soil surface in eroded areas. This phenomenon is

responsible for some of the local terms for the area, such as “buckshot land” (Batson 1952; Figure 13).

SOILS

Most of the soils at PCDB are shallow (Batson 1952), weathered from the diabase sill that lies just below the surface. Soils formed from this parent material are considered mafic, having high concentrations of iron, magnesium, and often calcium. Such an abundance of these elemental nutrients results in soils that are circumneutral with a pH ≥6.5; significantly higher than the range of 4.5–5.5 more typical of the ssurrounding

Piedmont (Oakley et al. 1995). Mafic soils weathered from diabase have a very dense clay hardpan just below the soil surface. This shallow hardpan creates an impermeable layer within the soil which restricts root depth and causes extreme hydrological conditions. During the winter and spring, the combination of flat topography and a clay hardpan cause a perched water table, a saturated soil surface, and standing water in some locations. Throughout the summer and fall, the soil dries and its high shirnk-swell clay content causes the soil to crack and become brick like (Batson 1952; Barnett-Lawrence 1994b; Figure 14). These extreme fluctuations in soil moisture conditions throughout the growing season create unfavorable conditions for many plants. Poor drainage and erosion caused by rapid runoff are especially unsuitable for agriculture (Koch 1967).

(37)

with a dark gray or purplish-black A horizon and a yellowish-brown to olive B horizon. When dry, the B horizon turns a rusty brown color (Batson 1952). Along Picture Creek, the soils are primarily the Chewacla and Wehadkee series (Inceptisols). Cewacla soils are also often circumneutral, though variability exists due to the alluvial nature of the series (Oakley et al. 1995). Representing only a small fraction of the site are

Creedmoor soils (Ultisol), which are acidic with A and B horizons that are orange or nearly red. These lighter-colored, acidic soils are much more abundant in the Piedmont than are the darker mafic soils that dominate PCDB. Though different in many ways, the Creedmoor series has a high shrink-swell clay content in common with its mafic counterparts (Juras 1997).

Alfisols

Iredell (IrB) loam (Fine, mixed, active, thermic Oxyaquic Vertic Hapludalfs; Figure 16, Figure 17). Moderately-well drained soils on interfluvial uplands with slopes 2–6%. Soils generally circumneutral, weathered from diabase bedrock 152–203 cm (60–80 in) below the surface. Typical soil profile exhibits a clay layer spanning the depth from 15– 64 cm (6–25 in) below the surface. Surface of water table located in upper 30– 61 cm (12–24 in) of soil (McQuaid and Varana 1997). Approximately 75.9% (309.5 acres) of PCDB is mapped as IrB (Soil Survey Staff 2013).

Inceptisols

Chewacla-Wehadkee association (ChA) alluvial loam, frequently flooded (Chewacla [60%]: Fine-loamy, mixed, active, thermic Fluvaquentic Dystrudepts; Wehadkee [36%]: Fine-loamy, mixed, active, nonacid, thermic Fluvaquentic Endoaquepts; Figure 16, Figure 17).

Somewhat poorly to poorly drained floodplain soils on 0–2% slopes. Soils weathered from ingneous and metamorphic rocks. Typical soil profile >203 cm (80 in) deep with loamy textures. Surface of water table located in upper 61 cm (24 in) of soil (McQuaid and Varana 1997). Approximately 5.6% (22.7 acres) of the site is mapped as ChA (Soil Survey Staff 2013).

Mollisols

Picture (PcA) loam (Fine, smectitic, thermic Vertic Argiaquolls; Figure 16, Figure 17).

(38)

Ultisols

Creedmoor (CrB, CrC) coarse sandy loam (Fine, mixed, semiactive, thermic Aquic Hapludults; Figure 16, Figure 17).

Moderately-well drained soils on interfluvial uplands and hillslopes. Slopes 2–10% (CrB 2–6%, CrC 6– 10%). Soils weathered from Triassic sedimentary rocks. Surface of water table located in upper 46– 61 cm (18–24 in) of soil. Typical soil profile >203 cm (80 in) deep exhibiting a clay layer spanning the depth from 18– 173 cm (7–68 in) below the surface (McQuaid and Varana 1997). Approximately 6.7% (27.3 acres) of the site is mapped as CrB or CrC (Soil Survey Staff 2013).

PLANT COMMUNITITES

PIEDMONT PRAIRIES

Piedmont prairies are unique natural communities that occur scattered throughout the Piedmont region of the southeastern US. It is often thought that grasslands only occur in areas that are too wet for desert but too dry for forest. However, this is not true in some areas. The southeastern US for instance, receives precipitation in amounts more than adequate to sustain forests. As Noss (2012) noted, seasonal drought alone would not be capable of producing the hundreds of millions of acres of southern grasslands that existed at the time of European settlement. In this region, grassland development is more closely tied to soil conditions, fire regimes, and disturbance. At PCDB, the natural community can be found in the powerline cut and in small patches of open woods. Based on current definitions (e.g., Schafale 2012, Noss 2012), the example at this site is probably most accurately described as a Piedmont prairie or a barren.

(39)

Despite many floristic similarities, the conditions under which Piedmont prairies develop, differ in many ways from the conditions responsible for the prairies of the Midwest (Tompkins et al. 2010; Table 3).

The arrival of American Indians in the Piedmont approximately 12,000 years ago played a major role maintaining these open areas. For thousands of years, these original inhabitants regularly burned the forest to facilitate travel and hunting. Beginning about 4,500 years ago, American Indian tribes began to establish more permanent settlements, based around agriculture. As these cultures transitioned from a primarily hunting-gathering existence, fire emerged as a useful tool for clearing land for agriculture (Noss 2012). Frequent burning of the land perpetuated the existence of these natural communities, mimicking the more sporadic, natural lightening-caused fires of the past. Frequent burning leads to an open understory with scattered mature trees (Juras 1997).

In her dissertation, Dobbs (2006) mapped out the primarly trade routes established by American Indians in the Piedmont of NC. One of the two major paths was within several kilometers of PCDB. Today, Interstate 85 follows a very similar route through the Piedmont (Juras 1997). Interestingly, this corridor also passes through many of the areas in the Piedmont that have high shrink-swell soils whose droughty conditions make them especially prone to fire.

During this project, many fragments of American Indian artifacts were encountered in the more eroded and exposed areas of the site. Perhaps the abundance of these fragments indicates the past existence of an American Indian settlement. The proximity of PCDB to one of the major trade routes would have made this a convenient settlement site. The presence of nearby floodplains would have provided good land for an agricultural society. Additionally, less-suitable soil conditions and the subsequent slow growth of woody plants on these barrens led to a naturally open canopy that would have required far less effort to clear an area for settlement. Historically, PCDB probably contained open post-oak and shortleaf pine woods with scattered patches of prairie on the shallowest soils (Barnett-Lawrence 1994b).

(40)

prairies are now confined almost entirely to anthropogenically disturbed sites such as utility corridors and roadsides (Davis et al. 2002; Noss 2012).

NATURAL COMMUNITY TYPES

The significance of the PCDB site is largely due to the fact that it supports the remnants of a Piedmont prairie. Historically, this Piedmont prairie most likely covered a significantly larger area, possibly dominating the area now occupied by Xeric Hardpan Forest (XHF). Apparently, underground perenniating structures of prairie species were able to persist under the XHF canopy for extended durations because when the powerline right-of-way was cut through the fire-suppressed forest in the mid 1980s, a natural community dominated by prairie plants emerged. These prairie-affiliated taxa have persisted in the powerline cut because this corridor has been frequently mowed and recently burned. Additionally, harsh soil conditions have slowed regeneration of woody species between disturbance events. If the entire PCDB site were to be cleared, it is likely that a variety of prairie plants would emerge in many areas.

In the following descriptions, plant community type concepts follow Schafale (2012) with additional species associations from Schafale and Weakley (1990). The first item in the parenthesis following each community name is an abbreviation for that community. The second item refers to the global rank of the community using the NatureServe (2013) ranking system. Included in brackets is the National Vegetation Classification name for the community type and its corresponding Community Element Global Code (CEGL). Refer to Figure 18 for the locations of natural communities at PCDB. Figure 19 shows the relationships among community types.

Dry-Basic Oak-Hickory Forest (DBOHF; G2G3; Figure 18, Figure 19) [Quercus alba - Quercus stellata - Carya carolinae-septentrionalis / Acer leucoderme - Cercis canadensis Forest (CEGL007773)].

This forest community type occupies much of the southeastern and northwestern portions of PCDB. Like DMBOHF(PS), this forest type occurs on mafic Piedmont soils. At this site, DBOHF is strongly correlated with Iredell (Oxyaquic Vertic Hapludalfs) soils. The southeastern portion of this community occurs on fairly level ground while the portion lying to the northwest occupies a north-facing slope.

The canopy is dominated by Quercus alba L. and other oak species such as Q. falcata Michx.and Q. stellata Wangenh. The midstory generally includes Cercis canadensis L., Cornus florida L., Fraxinus americana L., and Viburnum spp. The understory may include species such as Rhusaromatica Aiton and Symphoricarpos orbiculatus Moench. At PCDB, the northwestern occurrence of this community type contains numerous seedlings and saplings, with Quercus alba seedlings blanketing the ground in several areas.

(41)

Vaccinium spp. It differs from Dry-Mesic Basic Oak-Hickory Forest (Piedmont sybtype) by lacking more mesic oaks like Quercus rubra L. and instead is dominated by oaks associated with drier conditions. DBOHF also generally has fewer Carya spp. and Juniperus virginiana L. than the more mesic version of the community. In addition, this forest type is distinguished form Xeric Hardpan Forest by having less extreme soil conditions and fewer xerophytic canopy species such as Quercus falcata and Q.stellata.

Dry-Mesic Basic Oak-Hickory Forest (Piedmont subtype [DMBOHF(PS)]; G3G4; Figure 18, Figure 19) [Quercus alba - Quercus rubra - Carya (ovata, carolinae-septentrionalis) / Cercis canadensis Forest (CEGL007232)]

This community type covers the central portion of PCDB on both sides of the powerline cut, extending from slightly north of tower 4 to just south of tower 3. Typically occurring on mafic soils, DMBOHF(PS) at PCDB is found primarily in areas where the soils are mapped as Iredell (Oxyaquic Vertic Hapludalfs).

Topographically, this community occupies flat uplands and gentle slopes.

The canopy is comprised of oaks and hickories with Quercus alba being the dominant species. Fagus grandifolia Ehrh. and Liriodendron tulipifera L. are rare or absent in this community, as are oaks like Quercus falcata, Q. marilandica Münchh., and Q. stellata, which typically occur on drier sites. The sub-canopy often contains Acer floridanum (Chapm.) Pax,Cercis canadensis, Cornus florida, and Fraxinus americana L., as well as scattered Carpinus caroliniana Walter, Ilex opaca Aiton, and Juniperus virginiana. The shrub layer includes a variety of species such as Rhus aromatica Aiton, Viburnum prunifolium L., and Viburnum rafinesquianum Schult. Herbs such as Endodeca serpentaria (L.) Raf., Euphorbia corollata L., Scleria oligantha Michx., and Uvularia perfoliata L. are generally present in the understory.

DMBOHF(PS) is distinguished from similar Dry Oak-Hickory Forest by having moister soils. The more fertile soils, as well as the presence of species usually found on more basic soils, like Celtis spp., Cercis canadensis, Dichanthelium boscii (Poir.) Gould & C.A. Clark, Fraxinus americana, and Symphoricarpos orbiculatus,distinguish this community type from the Dry-Mesic Oak-Hickory Forest (the latter not known from the site). Certain species associated with floodplains such as Acer floridanum, Carya ovata (Mill.) K. Koch, and Elymus spp., are often present while plants of more acidic soils such as Chimaphila maculata, Oxydendrum arboreum, and Vaccinium spp. are infrequent.

Dry Oak-Hickory Forest (Piedmont subtype [DOHF(PS)]; G4G5; Figure 18, Figure 19) [Quercus falcata - Quercus alba - Carya alba / Oxydendrum arboreum / Vaccinium stamineum Forest (CEGL007244)].

Figure

Table 1.  All North Carolina Significantly Rare and Watch List taxa collected or reported from Picture Creek Diabase Barrens
Figure 35.  Osmundastrum cinnamomeum (Britton & Brown 1913).
Figure 37.  Juniperus virginiana (Britton & Brown 1913).
Figure 40.  Pinus virginiana (Britton & Brown 1913).
+7

References

Related documents

For measures that have building-wide impacts or impacts across a number of systems, engineering modeling using generally accepted public domain software is acceptable to

Embryos de- rived from this strain frequently display Lch neurons that are associated more closely than in wild type, ex- hibit a mild loss of neurons, show abnormal

Note that the LO is already µR dependent due to the coupling λ ′ ( µR ). We find significant reduction in the µR scale dependence when higher order QCD corrections are included. It

As a result, the new parameters of the project consisted of a basic search into the current issues relating to student data and school websites to provide general

For example, the first items that the Milwaukee Public Museum (MPM) now categorizes as Moche ceramic vessels were originally recorded in catalog books with no assigned culture.

The extended summary assists 5CGroup in attracting Western venture capital as it allows for an understanding of the main problems for Chinese SMEs seeking Western venture

51 Did the reporting organization directly or indirectly engage in any of the following with any other organization descnbed in section 501(c) of the Code (other than section

of Molecular Microbiology/Inmunology and USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA..