• No results found

State of the Cloud A cloud computing overview Presented to CALIS on behalf of Innovative Interfaces Inc November 9, 2012

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "State of the Cloud A cloud computing overview Presented to CALIS on behalf of Innovative Interfaces Inc November 9, 2012"

Copied!
34
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

State of the Cloud

A cloud computing overview

Presented to CALIS on behalf of Innovative Interfaces Inc

November 9, 2012

(2)

§

Today

s Agenda

§

Who is 451 Research?

§

What is the cloud? (our definition)

§

Growth trends & forecast

§

Adoption of cloud services

§

Case studies

(3)

About The 451 Group: Enterprise IT Research

3

(4)
(5)

§

Unique combination of research,

analysis & data

§

Published syndicated research on

emerging enterprise IT markets

§

600-node IT taxonomy!

§

Daily qualitative & quantitative insight

§

Analyst advisory, support

§

Global events

§

Go-to-market support

(6)

600-Item Technology Taxonomy

(7)

Financial Markets: M&A KnowledgeBase

Transactions database

Technology mergers and acquisitions database

§

30,000 deals from 2002, updated daily

§

600-item taxonomy

(8)
(9)

Cloud: what it is and what it isn

t

Cloud is not managed services: Key difference is that managed services traditionally offer fixed quantity of resources under a multi-year

contract.

Cloud is not outsourcing: In an

outsourcing arrangement assets are typically transferred in their entirety as a fixed quantity.

Cloud is not virtualization:

Virtualization is a cloud-enabling technology.

(10)

CloudScape Codex: 8 Cloud Attributes

Publically Accessible

Programmatic Interfaces

Multi-tenancy

Accounting Granularity

Scalability and Elasticity

Virtualization and

Automation Web

Management Capabilities

Rapid Provisioning

(11)

Delivery Models

SaaS:

PaaS:

IaaS:

Business processes and apps as a remotely hosted and managed service, accessible through a browser.

In-cloud platform for development and deployment of cloud apps, analogous to on-premises app server, plus multi-tenant elasticity and other cloud-features.

Virtual or physical hardware resources (e.g. compute, storage, network) offered as a service.

(12)
(13)

Deployment Models

Virtual Private

Hybrid

Public

Internal Private

Hybrid services have both private and public cloud computing elements.

Shared IT service provided to customers via the public Internet.

Implemented and delivered via a third party and is accessible via the public Internet.

IT capability offered as a service by an IT organization to its business using cloud-enabling technologies.

(14)

Cloud computing is IT as a Service

What End Users See

Utility Computing

What IT/Service Providers See

Policy, Governance Metering/Chargeback/Billing

Runbook/Process Automation On-boarding, Lifecycle Management

Workload Management Configuration Management

Application Streaming Automation OS Provisioning

Virtualization GRID/HPC/clusters

(15)
(16)

Financial Markets Group: Market Monitor - Cloud market sizing

Cloud Computing:

Cloud As a Service

§ 200+ Tracked Vendor Participants

§ 15 Market Segments

Cloud Enabling

Technologies:

Virtualization and

On-Premise

§ 120+ Tracked Vendor Participants

§ 6 Market Segments & 9 Sub-Segments

§ Revenue segmented by Geography, Vertical & Customer Size

Desktop

Virtualization

Ecosystem

§ 50+ Tracked Vendor Participants

(17)
(18)

Cloud Market Overview

Revenue ($bn)

(19)

Cloud Computing

As A Service

Estimated 2012 Revenue Breakdown, Including Enterprise Apps SaaS

(20)

Cloud Computing

As A Service

Est. 2012 Revenue Breakdown by Subsector

Total $4.9bn (270+ vendors)

Segment Vendor Count

Cloud Computing 'As A Service' 272

IaaS 132

Compute & Storage-as-a-Service 126 Stand-Alone Cloud Storage 9

PaaS 73

PaaS from SaaS 12

Stand-Alone PaaS 33

Application Lifecycle Management as a

Service 31

Pre-Production / Testing 18

Integration as a Service 13

Infrastructure SaaS 94

Online Backup 20

Cloud Archiving 10

IT Management as a Service 68

Systems & Network Monitoring &

Management 46

Resource Utilization, Capacity Planning &

Billing 18

IT Service Management 10

(21)

Cloud Computing

As A Service

Geographic Revenue Breakdown, (270+ vendors)

(*) Preliminary forecast

67% 63% 60% 57% 54% 20% 23% 24% 26% 28% 11% 12% 14% 15% 15% 2% 2% 3% 3% 4%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 NA EMEA APAC LATAM (*)

(22)

IaaS -

where the money is spent (130+ vendors, 2012)

North America

59%

EMEA

24%

APAC

15%

LATAM

2%

(23)

IaaS - where the money is counted (130+ vendors, 2012)

North America 88%

54 Vendors 31 VendorsEMEA 6%

LATAM 1% 9 Vendors

APAC 6% 38 Vendors

(24)

IaaS vendors in China and Hong Kong

Sector Vendor Headquarters

IaaS, PaaS Alibaba Hangzhou, China

IaaS China Telecom Beijing, China

IaaS ChinaCache Beijimg, China

IaaS CITIC Telecom CPC Hong Kong

IaaS CloudTerrrain Hong Kong

IaaS ClusterTech Hong Kong

IaaS GDS Services Beijing, China

IaaS UnGeo Beijing, China

(25)
(26)

Enabling Technologies = 2.5x value of as-a-Service market

Source: 451 Research Market Monitor (Data Cut 16 Oct, 2012)

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 CET - 27% CAGR $5.1 $7.8 $10.6 $13.5 $16.6 $19.9 Cloud "As A Service"

(27)
(28)

PUBLIC CLOUD ADOPTION: IS ANYBODY OUT THERE?

12% 12%

52%

14% 14%

11%

72% 71%

37%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 120% Storage as a Service

Compute as a Service Software as a Service

In-Use In-Plan Not In Plan

Q: What is your status of implementation for this technology?

(29)

Drivers of Adoption

Infrastructure as a Service

35% 37% 50% 50% 51% 53% 56% 59% 43% 37% 26% 27% 29% 28% 31% 25% 15% 19% 18% 15% 12% 13% 5% 8% 7% 7% 6% 8% 8% 6% 8% 8%

Enable business units to deliver innovative services to market

Self-service provisioning through a simple web portal instead of IT

Reduce complexity Getting new products/services to market faster Reduce expenses for power, floor, space, operations, facilities, amortization, and/or

networking

Reduce maintenance costs More efficiently meet our business units' service

demands

More efficiently deal with variability (elasticity)

Extremely to Very Important Somewhat to Minimally Important Not at All Important Don't Know/No Response

Where applicable, how important are the following factors in driving your adoption of different types of cloud

computing? Please use a 1-5 scale where ‘1’ is not at all important and ‘5’ is extremely important.

n=100. Cloud Computing

2H ‘12 Cloud Computing

(30)

Drivers of Adoption

Software as a Service

36% 39% 43% 44% 48% 48% 48% 60% 35% 38% 34% 42% 36% 30% 31% 29% 22% 17% 16% 8% 9% 16% 15% 5% 7% 6% 7% 6% 7% 6% 6% 6%

Self-service provisioning through a simple web portal instead of IT Enable business units to deliver innovative

services to market

Reduce expenses for power, floor, space, operations, facilities, amortization, and/or

networking

Reduce maintenance costs More efficiently deal with variability

(elasticity)

Reduce complexity Getting new products/services to market

faster

More efficiently meet our business units' service demands

Extremely to Very Important Somewhat to Minimally Important Not at All Important Don't Know/No Response

Where applicable, how important are the following factors in driving your adoption of different types of cloud

computing? Please use a 1-5 scale where ‘1’ is not at all important and ‘5’ is extremely important.

n=100. Cloud Computing

2H ‘12 Cloud Computing

(31)

Corporate cloud computing: current cloud usage

Corporate Market: Current Public Cloud Computing Use

Percentage of Respondents Whose Companies Currently Use Applications that Run on Cloud Computing Services

11% 14% 17% 17% 19% 22% 22% 29% 32% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% Jul 2010 Oct 2010 Jan 2011 Apr 2011 Jul 2011 Oct 2011 Jan 2012 Apr 2012 Jul 2012 Education Sector - 30% adoption

#1: SaaS #2: PaaS

(32)
(33)

Pain Points Moving to the Cloud

Internal Private Cloud Pain Points*

16% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 3% 3% 3% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 6% 6% 18% 19% 42% Other None Legacy Applications Maturity Migration/Integration Network Compliance Licensing Storage Automated Provisioning Automation Lack of Internal Process Reliability/Availability Security Complexity Internal Resources/Expertise Pricing/Budget Perception and Internal Resistance Management

External Public Cloud Pain Points*

12% 2% 2% 2% 3% 7% 8% 10% 12% 12% 12% 12% 69% Other Internal Resources/Expertise Interoperability Licensing Hybrid Cloud –Lack of …

Pricing/Budget Reliability/Availability Lack of Control Compliance Management Network Perception and Internal Resistance Security

Left Chart, n=62; Right Chart, n=59. *Note that due to multiple responses per interview, total may exceed100%.

As you move to an internal private cloud infrastructure

what are the two greatest pain points? As you move out to the external public cloud, what is or what do you expect to be the two greatest pain points? Cloud Computing Industry Profile - 1H Cloud Computing‘12 Industry Profile - 1H ‘12

(34)

Thank you!

References

Related documents

excision of the tumor on the anterior mitral leaflet and on the tricuspid septal leaflet respectively. Case 2 with a neoplasm on the aortic noncoronary leaflet and a coronary

The most important finding of this study is that opera- tive time was significantly longer in the trainee surgeon group; however, there were no significant differences in ROM, KSS,

Indications for the atrial septal defect closure were the same as those used for surgical closure, which included hemodynamically significant left to right shunts and (or)

ADCC, antibody dependent cellular cytotoxicity; AR, androgen receptor; B10 B cells, IL-10 producing B cells; BCa, bladder cancer; BCDM, B cell deficient mice; Bregs, B regulatory

Keywords: PD-1, Immune checkpoint blockade, Antibody therapy, Melanoma, Renal cell cancer, Immunotherapy, Concurrent

• A decrease in Total Contact Area results in an increase in pressures, peak pressures and peak pressure indices in the sacral area and heels.. • As the patient’s feet contact

Gill can act as an informative tissue for determining the effects of anoxia on energy metabolism proteins (Tomanek, 2008) and has already been used in numerous studies