• No results found

Duke Ethics & Compliance Office Update 2014

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Duke Ethics & Compliance Office Update 2014"

Copied!
8
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

ETHICS & COMPLIANCE OFFICE

Duke

 

Ethics

 

&

 

Compliance

 

Office

 

Update

 

2014

Research Wednesday

January 22, 2014

Margaret Groves, JD, CRA CCRP Director, CTQA

ETHICS & COMPLIANCE OFFICE

ETHICS & COMPLIANCE OFFICE

Objectives

• Discuss the recent merger of the School of 

Medicine Compliance Office with the Institutional 

Ethics and Compliance Program

• Detail how this office serves the Duke Medicine 

clinical research community 

• Discuss new processes and endeavors of the 

Duke University Ethics and Compliance Office 

that affects the Duke clinical research community

• Identify trends that CTQA has noticed in clinical 

research audits and recent FDA inspections  ETHICS & COMPLIANCE OFFICE

ETHICS & COMPLIANCE OFFICE

What is Changing

• DECO – Duke Ethics & Compliance Office

• Combined responsibility for Institutional and 

Medical compliance

(2)

ETHICS & COMPLIANCE OFFICE

DECO Goals

• Understand resources available at DECO 

–Compliance Review Service (CRS)

–Clinical Trails Quality Assurance (CTQA)

–University Compliance Monitoring

• Increase communication – both ways

• Ensure value‐added process

ETHICS & COMPLIANCE OFFICE

Compliance Structure at Duke

ETHICS & COMPLIANCE OFFICE

DECO – Future Changes

• Evaluate monitoring and reporting process

–Ensure efforts are consistent with risks

• Increase communication

–Liaison meetings, newsletters

• Explore new tools for monitoring and 

reporting

• Website update

(3)

ETHICS & COMPLIANCE OFFICE

New Inititiatives

• Assisting CRUs with developing a standardized 

process for monitoring of studies in the CRUs and 

reporting to the QA committee.

• If we can improve monitoring CTQA may be able 

to reduce the number of  routine reviews per 

year.

• Working with DOCR to create a monitoring group 

that could be available to study teams that need 

monitoring resources.

• Adverse events class development

ETHICS & COMPLIANCE OFFICE

Recent Trends

• Medical records access

• Uptick in FDA visits (3 since October)

• Informed Consent Process Issues

• HIPAA Violations

• Signature and Delegation Log Issues

• Missing Data on CRFs

• Protocol Not Being Followed

ETHICS & COMPLIANCE OFFICE

Accessing Medical Records

• We have seen an uptick in individuals reporting 

unauthorized medical records access.

Do not access medical records of employees or co‐workers

–Need authorization for family members

–My Chart:  https://www.dukemychart.org/home/Duke%20MyChart%20Adult%20 Proxy%20Authorization%20Form.pdf –Maestro Care:  http://him.duhs.duke.edu/wysiwyg/downloads/Employee_Authorizati on.pdf

(4)

ETHICS & COMPLIANCE OFFICE

FDA Visits

• Informed consent appropriately obtained

• 1572s in order

• Financial disclosures in order

• Subject meet eligibility criteria

• Test article accountability/ disposition 

adequately documented

• Protocol‐specific blinding/randomization 

procedures were followed

ETHICS & COMPLIANCE OFFICE

FDA Visits (cont’d)

• Source documents and CRFs are consistent with the  following data listings provided in the background  materials:

–Primary efficacy endpoint

–Secondary efficacy endpoints related to disease progression 

–Adverse events, serious adverse events and deaths 

–Protocol deviations

–Subject randomizations

–Subject discontinuation

–Concomitant medications

• Note that for Verification of the primary efficacy endpoint  and adverse event reporting, review of all subject records is  requested.

ETHICS & COMPLIANCE OFFICE

Informed Consent Process issues

Use correct version of consent

• Reconsent subject as soon as possible after 

amendment requiring reconsent

• Initial don’t just put check mark for opt in/out 

selections if consent requires initials

• Consenters must be authorized (new IRB policy) http://irb.duhs.duke.edu/wysiwyg/downloads/Who_Can_Conduct_Conse nt_Process_12‐20‐2013.pdf

• All parties must sign, date and indicate time

(5)

ETHICS & COMPLIANCE OFFICE

Informed

 

Consent

 

Process

 

Issues

 

(cont’d)

• No phone consent without IRB approval

• Consenter should NEVER sign for subject.  If 

subject is unable to sign, there should be a line 

for LAR signature

• Short form or translated consent must be IRB 

approved for non–English speaking subjects

• No alteration of consent without IRB approval

• Subjects must be given a copy of the ICF as Duke’s 

HIPAA Authorization is contained in the ICF.

ETHICS & COMPLIANCE OFFICE

HIPAA Violations

• Storing research data, including Electronic Protected Health 

Information (ePHI), on non‐Duke approved and/or non‐HIPAA 

compliant servers.

• The use of non‐encrypted personal computers, portable hard 

drives and USB thumb drives for storing research data, 

including ePHI.

• Creation and maintenance/adherence to Information Security 

Operations Plan (ISOPS) and Research Data Security Plans 

(RDSPs).

• Collection and use of PHI without proper Subject 

authorization and/or HIPAA Waiver of Authorization.

ETHICS & COMPLIANCE OFFICE

HIPAA Violations (cont’d)

• Retention of Social Security Numbers in patient files without 

authorization from the Information Security  Office (ISO).

• Notice of Privacy Practices (NPP) not provided to healthy 

Subjects per Duke policy and HIPAA regulations. (NPP 

Updated 9/2013)

• Failure to collect signed acknowledgement of receipt of the 

NPP or a procedure to identify subjects who have been given 

an NPP at first service delivery.

• Improper disposal and/or destruction of PHI.

• Contact Duke Medicine ISO before storing any VA data at 

Duke.  VA data must be maintained in a FISMA compliant 

(6)

ETHICS & COMPLIANCE OFFICE

HIPAA Violations (cont’d)

• Disclosure of PHI without an executed Data Use Agreement 

(DUA) in place and/or without Subject authorization.

• Transmission of Sensitive Electronic Information (SEI) and/or 

PHI without proper electronic security encryption.

• Use of personal email (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) for Duke business. • Please report suspected HIPAA issues in a timely 

manner, Duke has only 60 days to complete a 

breach investigation and corrective action. The 60 

days starts as soon as the first person at Duke 

knows of the breach, not when the Compliance 

Office is notified.

ETHICS & COMPLIANCE OFFICE

Signature

 

and

 

Delegation

 

Log

 

issues

• The investigator should maintain a list of 

appropriately qualified persons whom the 

investigator has delegated significant trial related 

duties. (GCP 4.1.5)

• Need to list all key personnel for the life of the 

study and list the duties they are authorized to 

perform on the study

• All personnel should sign – Important to obtain 

original signatures 

• Collect all required CV’s and Licenses

ETHICS & COMPLIANCE OFFICE

Missing

 

Data

 

on

 

CRFs

• All blanks need to be filled in or marked N/A

• Data should be consistent with source 

documentation – have a plan in place to look 

for transcription errors (data validation)

• Both paper and electronic CRFs  data should 

(7)

ETHICS & COMPLIANCE OFFICE

Protocol

 

not

 

being

 

followed

• Do not make changes to a protocol without IRB approval  unless imminent risk of safety to  subjects then need to  notify IRB immediately.

• Do not implement amendment changes until IRB approval  is obtained.

• Make sure study visits in window (timeline in MC)

• Document monitoring if protocol requires monitoring

• Be sure pregnancy tests are performed as needed for  research

• Make sure all study questionnaire being used are IRB  approved

• Make sure adverse events documented and reported as  required

ETHICS & COMPLIANCE OFFICE

Summary

• DECO is a resource for you

• Share ideas and efforts

ETHICS & COMPLIANCE OFFICE

Contact Information

Tina R. Tyson, JD, Chief Ethics and Compliance Officer, [email protected] 

CTQA and Billing Compliance,[email protected]

Margaret Groves, Director, [email protected]

Tasha Carmon, Senior Compliance Auditor, [email protected]

Aliki Martin, Senior Compliance Auditor, [email protected]

Nancy Szczech, Senior Compliance Auditor, [email protected]

Vivian Jordan, Compliance Auditor, [email protected]

Compliance Review Services

Tom Davis, Director, [email protected]

Tara Clayton, Senior Compliance Auditor, [email protected]

Mike Petrichko, Senior Compliance Auditor, [email protected]

Michele Ragland, Senior Compliance Auditor, [email protected]

Diane Padgett, Compliance Auditor, [email protected]

Ethics & Compliance Monitoring

(8)

ETHICS & COMPLIANCE OFFICE

Contact Information

• http://medschool.duke.edu/research/compliance‐office

• http://duke.edu/services/ethicscompliance

• MCAdmin Clinical Trials Quality Assurance  [email protected]

Hotlines:

–Duke University:  1.800.849.9793

–Duke Medicine: 1.800.826.8109

ETHICS & COMPLIANCE OFFICE

Questions? 

References

Related documents

For state and local governments, several methods of financing the production of these goods are available, including systems benefit charge (SBC) funds, issuance of energy

The developed methodology for determining different components of vulnerability and risk is demonstrated for six major damage centers (i.e., London, St. Marys, I ngersoll,

climatology; environmental chemistry; paleo-limnology; air emissions and air quality; human health; atmospheric transport and deposition of contaminants; oil sands process related

Commodity Shares of International Market Development Expenditures Before the implementation of the national soybean checkoff program, the evident strat- egy of the

The center is associated with the University of Bonn and offers a stimulating research environment through its international network, workshops and conferences, data service,

Treatment differences in terms of R levels and transition frequency are mainly driven by the adaptation process: figure 3 shows that groups which transition to the efficient

Based on the motivation crowding theory, this study investigated the moderating effect of monetary incentives on the relationships of motivations and members' intention for

If you love the idea of playing piano but don’t want to start with boring triads or note reading, you’re going to love learning to play the open position