• No results found

Closed, Re exive, Invertible, and Normal Subhypergroups of Special Hypergroups

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Closed, Re exive, Invertible, and Normal Subhypergroups of Special Hypergroups"

Copied!
6
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Closed, Reflexive, Invertible, and

Normal Subhypergroups of

Special Hypergroups

Pavl´ına Raˇ

ckov´

a

University of Defence, Brno, Czech Republic

[email protected]

Abstract

In [5] J. Jantosciak introduced several special types of subhyper-groups (invertible, closed, normal, reflexive) of a general hypergroup and studied their relationship. In this article, the full description of such subhypergroups in hypergroups induced by quasiordered groups is given. Further, it is shown that there are no such non-trivial sub-hypergroups in quasiorder sub-hypergroups.

Key words: Hypergroup, transposition hypergroup, join space, closed, reflexive, invertible, and normal subhypergroup, quasiordered group, quasiorder hypergroup.

MSC 2010: 20N20.

1

Introduction

We will sum up basic concepts from hypergroup theory and results which will be needed in the following text.

• Let H 6= ∅. A mapping ∗: H×H → P∗ is called binary hyperoperation on H. The pair (H,∗) is hypergroupoid.

• A hypergroupoid (H,∗) is extensive if {a, b} ⊆a∗b for any a, b∈H.

• A hypergroupoid (H,∗) is called hypergroup if the hyperoperation ∗ is associative, i.e

(2)

and the reproduction axiom

a∗H =H =H∗a for any a ∈H

is satisfied.

• Let (H,∗) be a hypergroup and S ⊆ H. Assume that a∗b ⊆ S for any

a, b∈S. Thus (S,∗) is an associative hypergroupoid (so called semihyper-group). If, moreover, it satisfies the reproduction axiom, that is, it is a hypergroup, we say that (S,∗) is subhypergroup of (H,∗).

• A hypergroup (H,∗) is called transposition hypergroup if the transposition axiom is satisfied, that is, for any quadruple of elements a, b, c, d ∈H the implication:

If b\a≈c/d, then a∗d≈b∗c

holds, where

b\a={x∈H :a∈b∗x}, c/d={x∈H :c∈x∗d}

are left and right extensions, respectively.

(For two set A, B, the symbol A ≈ B means that A and B are incident, i.e. A∩B 6=∅.)

• A commutative transposition hypergroup (H,∗) is called join space. The following concepts play the key role in the formulation of the main results.

Definition 1.1 A subhypergroup (S,∗) of a hypergroup (H,∗) is called

• closed if a/b⊆S and b\a⊆S for any a, b∈S,

• invertible if a/b ≈ S implies b/a ≈ S and b\a ≈S implies a\b ≈S for any a, b∈H,

• reflexive if a\S =S/a for any a∈H,

• normal if a∗S =S∗a for any a∈H.

J. Jantosciak (see [5]) proved that

• invertible subhypergroup of any hypergroup is closed,

• closed and normal subhypergroup of a transposition hypergroup is reflexive,

(3)

2

Hypergroups Induced by Quasiordered

Groups

First the relationship among closed, normal, invertible, and reflexive sub-hypergroups of sub-hypergroups induced by quasiordering will be tackled.

Definition 2.1 An ordered (quasiordered) group is a triple (H,·,≤), where

(H,·) is a group and “≤” is an ordering (quasiordering) on H having the substitution property on (H,·), that is for any quadruple a, b, c, d∈ H such that a≤b, c≤d, there is a·c≤b·d.

A hyperoperation is naturally induced on each (quasi)ordered group (H,·,≤). For x ∈ H, let us denote [x)≤ the principal end generated by x, that is [x)≤ = {y ∈ H : x ≤ y}. Analogously the principal beginning (x]≤ is defined. For x, y ∈ H, let us denote x∗y = [x·y)≤. Then (H,∗) is a hypergroupoid associated with (H,·,≤). The following result can be proven (see [3, 6, 7]):

Theorem 2.1 Let (H,·,≤) be a quasiordered group and (H,∗) the hyper-groupoid associated with it. Then (H,∗) is the transposition hypergroup.

Let (G,·,≤) bea quasiordered group, (G,∗), where a∗b= [a·b)≤, be the induced (transposition) hypergroup. Let (S,∗) be its subhypergroup, that is, [x·y)≤ ⊂S holds forx, y ∈S, namely x·y∈S.

For the right and left extensions we have:

a/b={x∈G:a ∈x∗b}={x∈G:x·b≤a}= ={x∈G:x≤a·b−1},

b\a={x∈G:a ∈b∗x}={x∈G:b·x≤a}= ={x∈G:x≤b−1·a}.

Theorem 2.2 A subhypergroup (S,∗) is closed iff (S,·) is a subgroup of the group (G,·) and (a]≤∪[a)≤ ⊂S for any a∈S.

Proof. Necessity:

For a∈S there isa/a= (e]≤, hence e∈S (e is the neutral element). If a∈S, then e/a= (a−1]

≤, hencea−1 ∈S.

If a∈S, then a/e= (a]≤, hence (a]≤ ⊂S. Because (S,∗) is a subhyper-group we also get a∗e= [a)≤⊂S.

Sufficiency: Let a, b ∈ S. Then a·b−1 S, so (a·b−1]

≤ = a/b ⊂ S.

(4)

Theorem 2.3 A subhypergroup (S,∗) is closed iff it is invertible. Proof. Each invertible subhypergroup is closed.

Now, let us assume that (S,∗) is closed. If a/b ≈ S, there exists x ∈ S

such that x ≤ a ·b−1. Due to the previous theorem a·b−1 ∈ S and also (a·b−1)−1 =b·a−1 S, thereforeb/aS. Especially,b/a S. Analogously

the statement forb\a can be proven. 2

Theorem 2.4 A subhypergroup (S,∗) is reflexive iff the following property holds: If for x, y ∈ G the element x·y is covered by an element of S, then y·x is also covered by an element of S.

Proof. The following equalities hold:

a\S= [ b∈S

a\b= [ b∈S

(a−1·b]≤,

S/a= [ b∈S

b/a =[ b∈S

(b·a−1]≤.

Hence, x ∈ a\S iff b ∈ S exists such that x ≤ a−1 ·b, that is, a ·x b.

Analogously x ∈ S/a iff c ∈ S exists such that x·a ≤ c. This implies the

statement. 2

If (S,∗) is a closed subhypergroup, according to the previous result, the condition “to be comparable with an element of S” is equivalent with the condition “to be inS”. Therefore, we get:

Corollary 2.1 A closed subhypergroup (S,∗) is reflexive iff the following property holds: If for x, y ∈G the element x·y∈S, then also y·x∈S. Theorem 2.5 A subhypergroup (S,∗) is normal iff the following property holds: If x·y, where x, y ∈G, covers an element of S, then y·x also covers an element of S.

Proof. The following equalities hold:

a∗S = [ b∈S

a∗b= [ b∈S

[a·b)≤,

S∗a= [ b∈S

b∗a= [ b∈S

[b·a)≤.

Hence, x ∈ a ∗S iff b ∈ S exists such that a·b ≤ x, that is, b ≤ a−1 ·x. Analogouslyx∈S∗a iffc∈S exists such that c≤x·a−1. This implies the

(5)

In case (S,∗) is a closed subhypergroup, analogously to reflexive subhy-pergroups we have:

Corollary 2.2 A closed subhypergroup(S,∗)is normal iff the following prop-erty holds: If for x, y ∈G the element x·y∈S, than also y·x∈S.

Joining the previous two results we get:

Corollary 2.3 Let (S,∗) be a closed subhypergroup. Then (S,∗) is normal iff it is reflexive.

3

Quasiorder Hypergroups

Now the relationship among closed, normal, invertible, and reflexive sub-hypergroups of quasiorder sub-hypergroups will be tackled.

IfR is a quasiordering on H we denoteR(a) ={x∈H :a R x}. Further, for A⊆H we set R(A) = S

a∈A

R(a).

Theorem 3.1 Let (H, R) be a quasiordered set. For any pair a, b ∈ H we set

a∗Rb=R(a)∪R(b) =R({a, b}).

Then (H,∗R) is commutative extensive hypergroup. For the proof see [3, p. 150, Th. 2.1].

Definition 3.1 Ahypergroup (H,∗)is said quasiorderif the following con-ditions are satisfied:

• a∈a3 ⊆a2,

• a∗b=a2b2

for any a, b∈H.

The following theorem characterizes all quasiorder hypergroups.

Theorem 3.2 A hypergroup(H,∗)is quasiorder iff a quasiorderingR on H exists such that for any a, b∈H there is

a∗b =R(a)∪R(b) =R({a, b}).

(6)

Theorem 3.3 Let (G,∗) be a quasiorder hypergroup. Then any subhyper-group of (G,∗) is reflexive and normal. Moreover, (G,∗) contains no proper closed or invertible subhypergroup.

Proof. Suppose that (G,∗) is a quasiorder hypergroup and R is a qua-siordering from the previous theorem.

The hyperoperation∗is commutative, hence any subhypergroup (S,∗) is reflexive and normal.

Further,

a/b={x∈G:a∈b∗x}={x∈G:a∈R(b)∪R(x)}.

Especially a/a = G. If (S,∗) is closed, then necessarily S = G. Therefore, no proper closed subhypergroup exists.

Analogously, any invertible subhypergroup is closed, therefore, no proper

invertible subhypergroup exists. 2

References

[1] Corsini, P., Leoreanu, V.,Applications of Hyperstructure Theory.Kluwer AP, Dordrecht, Boston, London 2003, 322 pp.

[2] Hoˇskov´a, ˇS., Representation of quasi-order hypergroups. Global Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 1, Number 2, India (2005), pp. 173–176.

[3] Chvalina, J.,Funkcion´aln´ı grafy, kvaziuspoˇr´adan´e mnoˇziny a komutativn´ı hypergrupy. Brno, MU 1995, 206 pp. (in Czech)

[4] Jantosciak, J., Transposition in hypergroups. Internat. Congress on AHA 6 (Prague 1996), Democtritus Univ. of Thrace Press, Alexandropo-lis, 1997, pp. 77–84.

[5] Jantosciak, J., Transposition hypergroups: Noncommutative join spaces.

J. Algebra 187 (1997), pp. 97–119.

[6] Raˇckov´a, P., Akce polohypergrup a modelov´an´ı hypergrup integr´aln´ımi oper´atory.PhD. Thesis, Faculty of Science, Palack´y University, Olomouc 2008, Czech Rep., 73 pp. (in Czech)

[7] Raˇckov´a, P., Hypergroups of symmetric matrices. 10th International

References

Related documents

But even when I am persuaded that there is particular evidence that some contemporary privacy scholarship or policy has actually responded to and improved from

On another level, in locating the discussion on global citizenship within a broader context of the “securitization” of immigration (Aas, 2011; Huysmans,

– The certificate or asymmetric key must be installed in the master database of the destination server, so that SQL Server can access the database files.. TRANSPARENT

Helping to create research questions and boost innovation in people is another opportunity that can be exploited by using virtual networks. Creativity and technology in today’s

The characters selected for characterization were tree vigour, growth habit, branching, leaf length (cm), leaf width (cm), number of leaflets, leaflet shape, leaflet margin,

Effect of coating on the water loss (WL) during osmotic dehydration of coated and uncoated pineapple samples at different concentrations of pectin, two levels of dipping time

The adapted checklist of Lee's Big ‘C' and little ‘c' cultural components (2009) was used for the current study. After content analysis, Big ‘C' cultural components with the highest,

We examined the relationship between biological aging (carbonyl accumulation) and the microbiota in various ways: (1) we performed distance-based linear model (DistLM) on the top