Serving counselor licensing boards for over 25 years
CAN COUNSELOR
LICENSING
LICENSING
PORTABILITY
ADDRESSING THE
NEED FOR
COMMON
WHO OWNS THE
RESPONSIBILTY FOR
SOLVING THE
PORTABIITY
PROBLEM?
THE ENTIRE
Licensing & AASCB
History
In 1986, 21 delegates from the 9 existing
state counselor licensing boards formed AASCB
Requirements ranged from 30 credits (Alabama) to 60 credits (Virginia) (AASCB, 1986a).
During that first meeting delegates discussed
licensing reciprocity and cited differences in state requirements as a major roadblock to be addressed (AASCB, 1986b).
By 1987, twenty-four states adopted counselor licensing laws, making common standards in
A call for a
summit…
“We (the Counseling profession)
have much to offer our fellow
human beings. The sooner we can
get our own house in order the
sooner we will free up even more
energy to address cultural and
social issues that confront our
world”.
Regulator or
counselor: Equally
responsible
“The need to remember that
protection of the public is more
than an expectation of legislators.
It is the
ethical responsibility
of every professional
counselor
as well as the
Problems identified
- 2004
Licensing board
complaints &
discipline data were unavailable
from AASCB & most states
ACA Ethics Committee & licensing
boards
rarely shared violation
information
The wide
variation of state
Interviews: Most important
issues facing the profession
(re: licensing)?
(Mascari, 2004)
Counselor identity
Portability
Variance in licensing
requirements
Psychologists
’
restricting
scope of practice
Use of certified clinical
Recommendatio
ns
Convene a major summit
of ACA, divisions, AASCB,
CACREP, NBCC to provide a
unified future direction
Consider merging efforts of
CACREP & CORE
Portability
requires
More
recommendation
s
AASCB spearhead a movement of all
“entities” to
develop a new
licensing model
(including the title)
CACREP reconsider the
role of
counseling psychologists
in
counselor preparation
ACA and all “entities” treat the issue
A tragic flaw in
licensing
The inclusion of the words “…and
related degrees” has created a
problem for counselor licensing.
Master’s level Psychology programs
are renaming their degree
Counseling Psychology and
qualifying for licensing.
The question we need to answer:
“Is the counseling profession
being hijacked by psychology?”
Multiple
Professional
Identity Disorder
Faculty in counselor education
programs with “mixed
professional identity”
Degrees in “related professions”
holding licenses and
Unresolved portability
issues
(from 2004) How many credits should a Master’s degree in
counseling contain? (CACREP has the answer)
How many supervised clinical hours after the
Master’s degree should a licensure candidate complete?
What exam(s) should be used for licensing?
(NCE,CMHCE, CRCE or something else)
What title(s) should be used for licensing? (LPC, LMHC,
or…)
What degree(s) should qualify for counselor licensing?
(Counseling)
What professional degree/field should supervisors hold
Jim Wilson as
Margaret Meade…
“a small group with a
limited revenue stream,
constantly changing
leadership and
membership can
What AASCB has
already
accomplished
Co-sponsored 20/20
Adopted a two-tier exam policy Adopted supervision standards
Adopted the consumer’s guide to internet
counseling
Adopted a portability policy & created the
Credentials Registry
Proposed a model for collecting discipline data Had influence in the development of the 2009
AASCB Portability
Requirements
A
current active License
to
practice counseling at the
independent level from an AASCB
member state
No disciplinary action
taken
5 years post
license counseling
Qualifications for
Group II
60 graduate semester hours including a master’s
degree in counseling or related field
Coursework the same as group I, with additional coursework in specific treatment modalities
4,000 hours of post master’s supervision. With 2,500 hours direct client contact
100 hours of clinical supervision
The 5 years of counseling experience must be in
clinical counseling
Qualifications for
Group I
48 graduate semester hours including a
Masters degree in counseling or related
field
Coursework to include specific content
that is consistent with CACREP
guidelines
3,000 clock hours of post master’s
supervision. 1,900 hours direct client
contact
100 hours of clinical supervision
Successful passage of a licensure
ASCB & 20/20
AASCB remains the single most important
organization representing the views and interests of counselor licensing boards
It played a critical role in the development of
20/20
Ongoing discussions among AASCB members
about licensure issues led to an informal meeting of
the AASCB presidential team (Jim Wilson, Charles Gagnon, and Barry Mascari)
ACA President Sam Gladding, and Chief Professional Officer David Kaplan at the January 2005 AASCB
annual meeting in Savannah
Mutual concerns about fragmenting counselor identity
The “summit”
challenge
A formal memorandum from
President Wilson for AASCB to
ACA to meet
the presidential teams
met at
the 2006 ACA conference in
Atlanta and agreed to
co-host a summit
to address:
counselor identity
licensing-related issues
almost 20 years after the
20/20 Unifying
Principles
Principle 1 “Sharing a common
professional identity is critical for
counselors”, underscoring the need for
professional and program identity
Principle 4 identified the creation of a
portability system as a priority for
strengthening the profession.
A consensus issue supporting Principle 4
pointed to the essential role of common standards:
“The counselor education program
Finally…
On October 28, 2010 the ACA Governing
Council approved the new definition :
“Counseling is a professional
relationship that empowers
diverse individuals, families,
and groups to accomplish
mental health, wellness,
20/20 Delphi initial
portability round (1-12)
- Coursework
Group theory & techniques
Counseling theory &
practice
Cultural diversity
Ethical issues related to
clinical practice
Professional orientation &
ethics
Assessment & appraisal
Human growth &
development
Research & program
evaluation
Career development Individual, group &
family counseling interventions
Psychopathology &
diagnosis & treatment
Cultural context of
relationships, issues & trends in a
Ranked items 1-12
look like
items 14, 15, 27
The
CACREP standards
The eight areas of professional
identity identified by CACREP
CACREP requirements for
So is the
picture
IS THERE A DIFFERENCE
BETWEEN COUNSELING &
PSYCHOLOGY OR SOCIAL
WORK?
We should hope so, or why is there a separate
licensing law in 50 states, Puerto Rico, DC, & Canada?
Courses in master’s level psychology
programs do not reflect common counseling standards (i.e., CACREP) found in the counseling licensing regulations of many states.
If we have to ask this question, or if you are
Professional
identity is
important
Tom Sweeney (2001) described the
complexities of developing
professional identity:
“…students in counselor education learn to distinguish themselves from other
practitioners with similar competencies and knowledge, for it is not the
What is a related
profession?
This has been the bane of our existence since
it was included in many licensing laws.
Tom Sweeney identified the purpose as hope
that MFTs would join our professional ranks
It was NEVER meant to include psychology, social work, etc. IN THE MODEL LICENSING
EFFORTS
It is time for this language to GO away!!!
the Masters in
Psychology
Accreditation Council
…established a new accreditation
process for counseling programs:
“This newly formulated professional
accreditation council represents an
expansion in the original Masters in
Psychology Accreditation Council
(MPAC), which has been in existence for
more than 15 years” (MPAC, 2011). With
flexibility in faculty qualifications, the
MPAC accreditation reintroduces
Fish or cut bait
1980s, there were 67 institutions with CACREP-accredited
programs
today there are 596 programs accredited in 264
institutions
Those efforts [MPAC], in my opinion, will only dilute much
of the progress that has been made to unify professional counselors over the past 30 years and create
unnecessary divisions within our profession.
When it comes to accreditation for professional
Do we need ANOTHER
accrediting body?
Counseling, unlike social work and psychology,
has not established a single entity containing its accreditation, credentialing, and professional organizations.
The American Psychological Association (APA,
2007) and the National Association of Social
Workers (NASW) Council on Social Work Education (CSWE, 2001) do not have separate accrediting bodies or multiple codes of ethics.
Herlihy and Remley (1995) identified at least
nine separate ethical codes among ACA, the divisions, and the accrediting bodies
a single ethical standard would help the public
Licensing boards benefit
from requiring CACREP
accreditation
It provides an expedited application review
and a consistent measure for evaluating minimum training criteria for licensure and practice.
With an external program accreditation
standard, the potential subjectivity in individual credentials evaluation and
board evaluation of programs is reduced
Criticism by US DOD
(2006)
“ …there is no well-established nationally recognized accrediting body for LPCs.
States have a wide range of standards, licensure and certification requirements for LPCs.
While CACREP accredits mental health counselor training programs…
The absence of a national homogeneous
standard curriculum to guide the training of LPCs fails to meet beneficiaries’ expectations for the national, uniform quality care that is the
TRICARE report
recognizes CACREP/
criticizes Boards
There appears to be little attempt to evaluate learning outcomes, and there is no specific documented evidence to indicate how
equivalence is determined.
In addition, because of wide variation among courses, course titles, and qualifications of
instructors, there is no empirical evidence that other accepted courses of study by licensure bodies have the same learning outcomes as accredited CACREP Clinical Mental Health
Recurring
symptoms
…there is not agreement among the
organizations [ACA, NBCC, AMHCA] that
CACREP should have been written into the
regulations…
This approach will unfortunately dilute the
value of the choice your program and
students have made to seek and maintain
CACREP accreditation and could
potentially undermine this important
The portability train
may have left the
TRICARE’s
Requirements
Possession of a state license for independent practice in mental health counseling
Master's degree or higher from a mental health counseling education and training program accredited by CACREP
Passing score on the National Clinical Mental Health Counseling Examination (NCMHCE) or its successor as determined by TRICARE.
Minimum of two (2) years of post-master's degree supervised mental health counseling practice
minimum of 3,000 hours of supervised clinical practice
100 hours of face-to-face supervision by a mental health
WHERE ARE
WE or WHERE
SHOULD WE
Unresolved
questions
How can we start comparing ourselves to
Social Work, not psychology, as our
standards have more in common?
Who will partner to fund the Portability Bank
(NCR)?
Who will partner to fund the C-DIN
(discipline databank)?
Unresolved…
How we resolve some of the testing dilemmas? How will we finally include Rehab Counselors in unified
licensing?
How can we get ACES to endorse AASCB initiatives?
Should AASCB hold its annual conference alternating years at ACA to have a presence? (or staff the booth!)
Should AASCB become IACLB?
What is getting in our
way?
Lack of funding
Constantly changing leadership and membership
at AASCB
Distancing ourselves at times, instead of being an
integral part of the profession
Conflicting state interests
Biting off more than we can chew
Counseling profession’s unresolved issues get
played out here at AASCB
Self interest, short-sightedness, turf wars, & power
Mascari’s oracle:
Achieving
portability
Achieving portability in the near future
depends upon all state licensing boards’
advocating for legislation that
includes
the 20/20 standards:
(a) common title for the licensed professional
counselor
(b) 60-credit counseling degree
(c) common number of supervised hours or
years of experience, and
(d) Resolving the examination dilemma (i.e.,
NCE and NCMHCE or CRCE or something new)