• No results found

CloudHarmony Performance Benchmark: Select High-Performing Public Cloud to Increase Economic Benefits

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "CloudHarmony Performance Benchmark: Select High-Performing Public Cloud to Increase Economic Benefits"

Copied!
8
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

What You Will Learn

Even small differences in cloud performance can affect costs, customer satisfaction, and time to market.

This white paper, intended for enterprises evaluating public cloud services, summarizes the results of an independent comparison of public cloud service performance conducted by CloudHarmony in March 2011:

• Forty-four tests measured performance for CPU-intensive tasks, disk I/O, memory I/O, interpreted-language

programming, and encryption and encoding.

• The tests compared the performance of a cloud compute instance to a baseline compute instance operating on Intel Xeon 5500-series processors.

• The Savvis Symphony Virtual Private Data Center (VPDC) performed at or near the top of the CloudHarmony

benchmark in all five categories. The service platform consists of Cisco UCS® B200 M2 Blade Servers using two Intel Xeon 5570 4-core 2.93-Ghz processors and 96 GB RAM

In the Cloud, Performance Matters

Organizations of all sizes are moving some or all of their business computing to the cloud, attracted by favorable economics. One benefit is that usage-based billing lowers costs compared to purchasing infrastructure that sometimes sits idle. But not all clouds are equal, and the extent of the savings depends upon infrastructure performance. That is, the more work the cloud platform can do in a unit of time, the

• Google reported that a 400-milisecond delay in presenting search results, less than the blink of an eye, reduced the number of searches per user by .59 percent

• AOL observed that users who experience the fastest page loads view 50 percent more pages per visit than those who experience the slowest page loads

• When Shopzilla accelerated page load times from approximately seven to two seconds, revenue increased by 7–12 percent

• AutoAnything, a web-based supplier of auto accessories and parts, measured customer satisfaction before and after improving web performance for page loads from 14 to seven seconds. Customers were 29 percent more likely to buy on their first visit, and 38 percent more likely to return to the site

CloudHarmony Benchmark: Empirical

Comparison of Public Cloud Performance

Savvis, a leading global provider of cloud infrastructure for enterprises, asked CloudHarmony to conduct a benchmark comparing the performance of leading public cloud providers. CloudHarmony, which is not affiliated with or funded by any cloud provider, tested the following services:

• Savvis Symphony Virtual Private Data Center (VPDC) • Amazon EC2

• IBM SmartCloud Enterprise • Terremark vCloud Express

CloudHarmony Performance Benchmark:

Select High-Performing Public Cloud to

Increase Economic Benefits

(2)

After assessing 44 performance metrics, including both synthetic and real-world performance testing, CloudHarmony aggregated the results into five performance categories: • CPU, relevant to compute-intensive tasks such as Monte

Carlo simulations used in the financial services industry • Memory I/O, relevant to caching systems and

memory stores

• Disk I/O, relevant to database and web server

• Interpreted language processing, relevant to development in the cloud

• Encryption and encoding, relevant to security and privacy protection

The tests revealed how much better or worse the compute instance performance compared to a baseline compute instance. If a baseline score is 100, then a compute instance earning an aggregate result of 125 is 25 percent faster than the baseline. An instance earning an aggregate score of 75 is 25 percent slower.

CPU Results

What benchmark measured:

Most relevant for:

Business impact:

Baseline:

See company comparisons for CPU results in Figures 1 and 2.

CloudHarmony Performance Benchmark:

Select High-Performing Public Cloud to

Increase Economic Benefits

White Paper

Based on the Amazon EC2 Compute Unit (ECU), the CloudHarmony Compute Unit (CCU) compiles 19 different CPU benchmarks

Compute-intensive tasks such as big-data analysis, email routing, and multi-threaded applications

Lower computing costs and faster application response times

Intel Xeon Processor 1.2 GHz 2007 [Verifying model #]

(3)

CloudHarmony Performance Benchmark:

Select High-Performing Public Cloud to

Increase Economic Benefits

White Paper

1 Core Config Cores Memory (GB)

Savvis 1 2 Amazon 1 3.75 IBM 2 2 Terremark 1 1 Rackspace 4 2 8 10 12 14 Figure 1. CPU Results

Savvis VPDC Ranked Highest in CPU Performance for 8-, 4-, and 2-Core Configurations

Large Config Cores Memory (GB)

Savvis 8 32

Amazon 16 23

IBM 16 32

Terremark 8 16

Rackspace 8 30

Medium Config Cores Memory (GB)

Savvis 4 8

Amazon 1 3.75

IBM 4 8

Terremark 2 4

Rackspace 4 4

Small Config Cores Memory (GB)

Savvis 1 2 Amazon 1 1.7 IBM 2 2 Terremark 1 1 Rackspace 4 2 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 35 27 13 Savvis VPDC 34 3 1 AWS EC2 26 10 6 IBM SmartCloud Enterprise 6 4 4 Rackspace 23 10 5 Terremark vCloud Express CCU

Large Config Medium Config Small Config

(4)

Disk I/O Results

What it measures: Most relevant to: Business impact:

Baseline (100 points):

See how each cloud provider ranked in disk results in Figure 3.

CloudHarmony Performance Benchmark:

Select High-Performing Public Cloud to

Increase Economic Benefits

White Paper

How fast compute instances read from and write to disk

Database and web server workloads Lower computing costs because of faster execution; faster project completion

Dual-processor Intel Xeon Processor E5506 2.13 GHz, with eight cores total and four 15,000 RPM SAS drives in a RAID 1+0 configuration

Figure 3. Disk Results

Savvis VPDC Ranked First in Large and Medium Configurations

Small Medium Large 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 140 160 91

Savvis VPDC AWS EC2 98

IBM SmartCloud Enterprise

GoGrid and Rackspace tested with local storage. All other vendors tested with off-instance storage such as SAN.

OpSource had best IOP in large class with 198.26 and best in medium class with 190.24. GoGrid had the best in the small class with 150.72.

Rackspace Terremark vCloud Express

IOP

(5)

Memory I/O Results

What it measures:

Most relevant to: Business impact: Baseline (100 points):

See how each cloud provider ranked in memory results in Figure 4.

CloudHarmony Performance Benchmark:

Select High-Performing Public Cloud to

Increase Economic Benefits

White Paper

How fast the cloud server reads and writes data to memory

Caching systems and memory-based data stores

Faster application response time Dual Intel Xeon Sever 5504 Quad-Core with 2.00 GHz processors and 48 GB DDR3 ECC RAM

Large Config Cores Memory (GB)

Savvis 8 16

Amazon 16 23

IBM 16 32

Terremark 8 16

Rackspace 8 30

Medium Config Cores Memory (GB)

Savvis 4 8

Amazon 1 3.75

IBM 4 8

Terremark 4 8

Rackspace 4 4

Small Config Cores Memory (GB)

Savvis 1 2 Amazon 1 1.7 IBM 2 2 Terremark 1 1 Rackspace 4 2 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 145.0 145.7

(6)

Interpreted Language Programming Results

What it measures:

Most relevant to: Business impact: Baseline (100 points):

Figure 5 displays each cloud provider’s results in interpreted language programming.

CloudHarmony Performance Benchmark:

Select High-Performing Public Cloud to

Increase Economic Benefits

White Paper

Performance of four languages commonly used to develop server-side software applications, including Java, Ruby, Python, and PHP Software development

Faster time to market, more time for quality testing

Dual-processor Intel Xeon Processor E5506 2.13 GHz (8 cores total) with four 15,000 RPM SAS drives configured in hardware-managed RAID 1+0

Figure 5. Interpreted Language Programming Results Savvis VPDC Performed Faster for Programming Across Large, Medium, and Small Environments

Large Medium Small 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180

Savvis VPDC AWS EC2 IBM SmartCloud

Enterprise Rackspace vCloud ExpressTerremark

Lang

0

(7)

Encoding and Encryption Results

What it measures:

Most relevant to:

Business impact: Baseline (100 points):

Figure 6 illustrates each company’s encoding and encryption results.

CloudHarmony Performance Benchmark:

Select High-Performing Public Cloud to

Increase Economic Benefits

White Paper

Speed of encoding and encryption Storing sensitive information in the cloud, including intellectual property, healthcare records, and financial information

Secure access and compliance with privacy requirements

Dual Intel Xeon Server E5504 Quad-Core 2.00 GHz processors with 48 GB DDR3 ECC RAM

Figure 6. Encoding and Encryption Results

Savvis VPDC Ranked First for Encryption and Encoding

Large Medium Small 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180

Savvis VPDC AWS EC2 IBM SmartCloud

Enterprise Rackspace vCloud ExpressTerremark

Encode

(8)

About the Savvis Symphony VPDC

Infrastructure: Built on Cisco Unified

Computing System™

Savvis Symphony VPDC is one of the industry’s first enterprise-class virtual private data center solutions, providing multi-tiered security and service and network profiles. The service is built on Cisco® UCS B200 M2 Blade Servers featuring dual Intel Xeon 5570 4-core 2.93-Ghz processors and 96 GB RAM.

Conclusion

Introduced in 2010, The Savvis Symphony VPDC performed at or near the top of all five test categories: CPU, disk I/O, memory I/O, interpreted-language programming, and encryption and encoding. Therefore, organizations that use

the Savvis Symphony VPDC to extend or replace their own data centers stand to gain the most in terms of cost savings, incremental revenue from a faster customer experience, and first-to-market advantage.

For More Information

To learn more about Savvis cloud services, visit: www.savvis.com/cloud

To learn more about the Cisco Unified Data Center solutions at the foundation of the Savvis Symphony VPDC, visit: www.cisco.com/go/udc

To read the full benchmark report, call Savvis: 1-800-SAVVIS1.

CPU Memory Disk Encryption Language

Unit CCU MIOP IOP Encode Lang

Baseline

Config Amazon EC2 ECU Dual Intel E5504 Quad core 2.00 GHz processors and 48 GB DDR3 ECC ram

Dual Intel E5506 2.13 GHz (8 cores) with 4X15K RPM SAS drives with hardware RAID 1+0

Dual Intel E5504 Quad core 2.00 GHz processors and 48 GB DDR3 ECC ram

Dual Intel E5506 2.13 GHz (8 cores) with 4X15K RPM SAS drives with hardware RAID 1+0

Test 19 7 7 7 4

Test

Names c-ray, crafty, dcraw, espeak, geekbench, graphics-magick, hmmer, john-the-ripper-(blowfisj, des, md5) mafft, nero2d, openss, opstone-(svd, svsp, vsp), sudokut, tscp, unixbench CacheBench, Geekbench, hdparm, RAMspeed, Redis Benchmark Stream, Unixbench Blogbench, Bonnie++, Dbench, Flexible IO Tester, hdparm buffered disk reads, IOzone, Threaded I/O Tester Monkey Audio Encoding WAV To FLAC, WAV To MP3, WAV To Ogg, WAV To WavPack, FFmpeg AVI to NTSC VCD, GnuPG SPECjvm, Ruby, Python, PHP

References

Related documents

smartBridges’ carrier-class, high performance wireless connectivity products empower communication service providers to deploy cost effective, scalable, high performance wireless

Prevalence of TST positivity was compared between household contacts by HIV and ART status of the index case to distinguish those not on ART or on ART for ,1 year from those on ART

Through secret diplomatic channels, Napoleon asked Jefferson if the United States would help a French army traveling by sea to St.. Jefferson replied that “nothing will be easier

of biosynthesis to prevent supraoptimal levels of ethylene during vegetative growth and (2) auto-catalysis of biosynthesis for rapid induction of ethylene production in response

The number of people for whom DWDA prescriptions were written (DWDA prescription recipients) and the resulting deaths from the ingestion of prescribed DWDA medications (DWDA

In our empirical application, consider the case where we have four fresh retail meat products ordered as follows: fresh beef, fresh pork, fresh chicken and fresh seafood.. This

Figure 6.2: Leftover search space with the correct key. Finally, we should highlight that our implementation of the attack only returns the leftover search space if at least a

32 12:12 Nursing office query Nurses’ station Delay NA 33 12:16 Dietitian informs Nurses’ station Disrupt indirect Intervention 34 12:20 Linen unavailable PT room Disrupt