© 2011 Deloitte & Touche
Real Estate Investment Trusts
The Beginning!
© 2011 Deloitte & Touche
Introduction
Pádraic Whelan – Opening address
Phil Nicklin – Where and Why?
Pádraic Whelan – Key Irish REIT features
Deirdre Power – Gross Roll up funds V REIT
Michael Flynn – An Irish financing perspective
© 2013 Deloitte LLP. Private and confidential
3
REITs: Where and Why?
Phil Nicklin
“REITs are recognised as an effective
structure to finance and manage listed real estate and are a key feature of the majority of the world's developed investment
jurisdictions... EPRA's view is that there are 34 countries worldwide that have REIT or 'REIT-like' legislation in place.”
REITs: Where?
34 regimes around the world
Policy objectives include:
• Attracting capital into the UK built environment, especially the private rented sector
• Alongside wider reforms to the planning system, providing a route into which newly
developed rented accommodation can be sold, thereby increasing the willingness of house builders to increase supply
• Allowing smaller scale investors the opportunity to access commercial property returns
• Improving stability in the property investment market by rebalancing some debt with equity among property companies
UK Government’s perspective
REITs: Why?
• Access to the global REIT “brand” and international capital
• Liquid and publicly available source of property investment
• Improved after-tax returns for shareholders: Removal of traditional “double-layer” of taxation
• Effective elimination of capital gains
‒ Add value by eliminating existing latent gains
‒ Competitive advantage on corporate acquisitions
‒ Commercial decisions in a tax exempt environment
REITs: Why?
Investor perspective
© 2013 Deloitte LLP. Private and confidential
7
© 2013 Deloitte LLP. Private and confidential
The UK story so far
8
• 25 REITs
• c£50 billion of property
With the exception of the majors, REITs tend to specialise
Diversified Industrial London “Alternatives” • British Land • Land Securities • SEGRO • Hansteen • Mucklow (A&J) Group • Derwent • Great Portland Estates • Big Yellow • Primary Health • Workspace • Target
Shopping centre Retail Alpha Micro-cap • Hammerson • Intu Properties • Shaftesbury • Town Centre Securities • Local Shopping REIT
• New River REIT
• London Metric • Glenstone • Pineapple • Highcroft Investments • Warner Estates • McKay Securities • ApexHi • Ground Rent Income Fund
Source: Deloitte research
Existing REIT population
By market capitalisation - source: FT 15/03/2013
Diversified Majors Specialised Micro-cap
© 2013 Deloitte LLP. Private and confidential
The UK story so far
9
Capital raising
Notes: 1 Volume based upon the top 20 shareholders of the top 10 UK listed REITs by market capitalisation per Bloomberg 14/032013
Source: Bloomberg 14/03/2013 1
Provides access to overseas capital
Key overseas investors REIT investors1 • AMP Redding
• APG • Blackrock • Cohen & Steers • Colonial First State • GIC
• ING Clarion • Morgan Stanley • Norges Bank
• Ontario Teachers Pension Fund • Third Avenue Non-UK: 60% UK: 40%UK 25% Non UK 75%
© 2013 Deloitte LLP. Private and confidential
10
Key Irish REIT features and conditions
Pádraic Whelan
Irish REITs
Rent profits and capital gains tax
free
- At least 1.25 times interest. Cover otherwise
excess taxable. - Debt of REIT cannot exceed 50% of M.V. of
assets of the REIT
Dividends to shareholders with excessive rights > 10% will result in REIT having
taxable income
- 75% of income / assets are rental assets - At least 3 properties no one > 40% of M.V. of all
Distribute 85% of rent or C.T. at 25% on the GAP
Cease to rent an asset – CGT event. Residual business – asset moved over – CGT
event - 3 years from conversion
to list and be non close - 3 years to have right
mix of properties Companies converting - CGT event 20% DWT on property income dividend Acquisition followed by development. Hold for 3
years to avoid 25% CT
Irish REIT – the building blocks
Foreign property possible but tax
leakage
Irish incorporated and resident
Listing on main market of a recognised stock exchange (EU) Widely held Group structure 100% SPV’s 2% stamp on real estate 1% duty on share transfers
REIT
REITS : Tax treatment of property investment income
Investment via REIT
Tax payable by investors
Profits flow through to be taxed annually on
investor only
Marginal tax rate on income Credit for 20% DWT
Corporates CT @25%
CGT @33% on disposal of REIT shares
Irish resident Investors
Foreign Investors
Tax treaty benefits
Disposal of REIT shares does not attract Irish CGT
© 2013 Deloitte LLP. Private and confidential
14
• General Improvements to legislation ? ( loan to Value / Entry Charge ) • Mortgage REITs
• Private, unlisted REITs?? • Residential Housing REITs
Potential future enhancements
© 2013 Deloitte & Touche
Deirdre Power
Gross roll up funds -
How do they measure
up to the REIT?
March, 2013
© 2013 Deloitte & Touche
17 Gross roll up funds – how do they measure up to the REIT?
QIF
REIT
Form
• Company, Unit Trust,
ILP
• Company
Regulated
• Yes (24 hr approval
possible)
• No (but listed/possible
AIFMD?)
Shareholder
requirements
• Min. initial subscription
of €100k
• Professional investor
• PPIU rules
• Widely held
• Not close company
• Penalty tax charge re
shareholders owning
> 10%
Investments
• No restrictions
• Risk spreading principle
for corporate structure
• 75% of income must be
property rental
• Min. 3 properties
• MV of any asset < 40%
of total MV
Leverage
• No restrictions
• Penalty charge if 1.25:1
property financing ratio
breached
© 2013 Deloitte & Touche
18 Gross roll up funds – how do they measure up to the REIT?
QIF *
REIT
Income and gains
• No tax at fund level
• Property rental
income/ gains exempt
• 25% tax on gains from
property developed in
3 year period
• 25% tax on Residual
business
Distributions
• No WHT
• DWT @ 20% - must
pay out 85% of
property rental income
Treaty access
• Treaty by treaty analysis • Yes
Conversion to REIT
• No – new set up
needed
• Yes:
-2% commercial stamp
duty
-CGT on transfers
QIF v. REIT
Tax comparison
© 2013 Deloitte & Touche
19
QIF*
REIT
Irish resident income
Individual
PPIU
Corporate
Pension funds
8 year rule for Irish
residents
33%
53%
25% (12.5% if trading)
Nil
Yes
Marginal rate/USC/PRSI
N/A
25%
Nil
No
Irish resident gains:
Individual
PPIU
Corporate
Pension funds
8 year rule for Irish
residents
36%
56%
25% (12.5% if trading)
Nil
Yes
33%
N/A
33%
Nil
No
QIF v. REIT
Investor Tax comparison
© 2013 Deloitte & Touche 20
QIF*
REIT
Non-residents
Income
Gains
Nil
Nil
20% DWT – subject to
treaty access
Nil
QIF v. REIT
Investor Tax comparison
Gross roll up funds – how do they measure up to the REIT?
© 2013 Deloitte & Touche
AIFMD
Qualifying Investor Fund (QIF) regime
21
Corporate
governance
Valuations
guidelines
Investor
disclosure
Authorisation
& supervision
Independent
depositary
The existing QIF regime already has many of AIFMD’s attributes
© 2013 Deloitte & Touche
QIF to QIAIF
What’s changing?
22 Gross roll up funds – how do they measure up to the REIT?
QIF
QIAIF
Promoter regime
Appoint AIFM
Investment flexibility
Borrowing/leverage permitted
Speed to market
Independent depositary
Capital requirements
Delegation framework
Detailed risk management rules
Detailed regulatory report
Investor disclosures
Conduct of business
EU Passport
(+)
(+)
(+)
(+)
(+)
23
REITs
An Irish Financing Perspective
Michael Flynn
Agenda
24
• What investors want and don’t want • Irish context
• Issues to be solved for REITs to succeed • Can it work in Ireland
What are REIT investors typically seeking?
25
Some of the key requirements for a REIT seeking capital
1 . Specialism • Geography, sector, income type
2. Low LTV • Average across the majors is only 43%*
3. Strong dividend yield • REITs are primarily seen as an income investment with capital upside
4. Scale • Where seeking to attract capital, a market capitalisation around £150m is typically sought for liquidity
5. Free float • Where seeking to attract capital this needs to be sufficient to provide secondary trading liquidity
6. An asset pool • Blind vehicles are difficult to raise (unless “rock-star” management)
7. Management track record and alignment
• Preferably made money for listed investors before
1 –*Source: Jeffries 19/09/2011
Typically these are requirements when raising significant capital as a REIT
© 2013 Deloitte & Touche Real Estate Investment Trusts | The Beginning!
What investors do not want!!
26
Investors will typically not provide capital to...
1 . Deleverage • Do not want to pay for the de-leveraging of an over-geared company
2. External management • Strong preference for internal management – external is difficult but not impossible
3. Opaque vehicles • Premium valuations for transparency and disclosure
4. Diversification • A diversified portfolio with no clear story will be unattractive
Irish Context
27
• Significant levels of Real Estate investment in past
• Most real estate highly leveraged
• Significant value impairment in recent years
• Economic owner in many cases is bank(s)
• Strong desire of international capital to acquire assets
• Agreeing valuation remains stumbling block
Issues to be solved in Ireland
28
• Why would company put assets into REIT? ‒ particularly if LTV underwater
‒ Need to solve what happens residual debt
• Is there enough appropriate assets to put in REIT
• Could banks use REIT as potential deleveraging structure rather than portfolio sales
• Need to attract capital
‒ What will Irish REIT provide versus International REITs ‒ What assets will attract greatest interest
‒ Will other Irish opportunities distract from REITs
Can Ireland Deliver?
29
Some of the key requirements for a REIT seeking capital
1 . Specialism • Yes
2. Low LTV • Will require funder agreement 3. Strong dividend yield • Potential – selected assets
4. Scale • Yes
5. Free float • Yes
6. An asset pool • Should be possible 7. Management track
record and alignment
• Potential
Real Estate Investment Trusts | The Beginning! © 2013 Deloitte & Touche
© 2013 Deloitte LLP. Private and confidential
30
Phil Nicklin, Partner
Tel: +44 20 7007 2984
Email: pnicklin@deloitte.co.uk
Padraic Whelan, Partner
Tel: +353 1 417 2848
Email: pwhelan@deloitte.ie
Contact details
31 © 2013 Deloitte & Touche
Deirdre Power, Partner
Tel: +353 1 417 2448
Email: dpower@deloitte.ie
Michael Flynn, Partner
Tel: +353 1 417 2515
© 2013 Deloitte & Touche Deloitte refers to one or more of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited, a private company limited by guarantee, and its network
of member firms, each of which is a legally separate and independent entity. Please see www.deloitte.com/ie/about for a detailed description of the legal structure of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited and its member firms.
These materials and the information contained herein are provided by Deloitte & Touche and are intended to provide general information on a particular subject or subjects and are not an exhaustive treatment of such subject(s). Accordingly, the information in these materials is not intended to constitute accounting, tax, legal, investment, consulting or other
professional advice or services. The information is not intended to be relied upon as the sole basis for any decision which may affect you or your business. Before making any decision or taking any action that might affect your personal finances or business, you should consult a qualified professional adviser. These materials and the information contained therein are provided as is, and Deloitte & Touche makes no express or implied representations or warranties regarding these materials or the information contained therein. Without limiting the foregoing, Deloitte & Touche does not warrant that the materials or information contained therein will be error-free or will meet any particular criteria of performance or quality. Deloitte & Touche expressly disclaims all implied warranties, including, without limitation, warranties of merchantability, title, fitness for a particular purpose, non-infringement, compatibility, security and accuracy.
Your use of these materials and information contained therein is at your own risk, and you assume full responsibility and risk of loss resulting from the use thereof. Deloitte & Touche will not be liable for any special, indirect, incidental, consequential or punitive damages or any other damages whatsoever, whether in an action of contract, statute, tort (including, without limitation, negligence) or otherwise, relating to the use of these materials or the information contained therein.
If any of the foregoing is not fully enforceable for any reason, the remainder shall nonetheless continue to apply.