• No results found

Natural Glue Final Draft

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Natural Glue Final Draft"

Copied!
45
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Chapter 1 Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION Background of the Study

Background of the Study

Through history, humans had a thirst for knowledge and development. From Through history, humans had a thirst for knowledge and development. From the beginning of human kind, the discoveries made by our race have shaped our  the beginning of human kind, the discoveries made by our race have shaped our  future forever. We have always wanted to know why things happen and why we future forever. We have always wanted to know why things happen and why we always want to push the boundaries of what are possible. This has led to some of  always want to push the boundaries of what are possible. This has led to some of  the greatest discoveries man had

the greatest discoveries man had in different fields of endeavors.in different fields of endeavors.

Glue has been an important material at home, at school and at office. Most of  Glue has been an important material at home, at school and at office. Most of  the commercially available glue is claiming to be non-toic. !owever, it is still the commercially available glue is claiming to be non-toic. !owever, it is still uncertain of this claim since they contain preservatives that may harm both the user  uncertain of this claim since they contain preservatives that may harm both the user  and the environment.

and the environment. "a

"aseseinin, , a a prprototeiein n obtobtaiainened d frfrom om mimilklk, , hahas s bebeen en lolong ng prprovoven en to to plplay ay anan important role in the production of glue. #t can be obtained from milk by means of  important role in the production of glue. #t can be obtained from milk by means of  adding vinegar into the milk. The curd formed from the reaction is mied with baking adding vinegar into the milk. The curd formed from the reaction is mied with baking soda. The produced glue from milk may vary in consistency depending upon the soda. The produced glue from milk may vary in consistency depending upon the amount of milk, and other raw materials used. $ther research conducted claims that amount of milk, and other raw materials used. $ther research conducted claims that glue made from milk casein is waterproof and can be used for bottle labeling and glue made from milk casein is waterproof and can be used for bottle labeling and cigarette packaging.

cigarette packaging. !o

!owweveverer, , frfresesh h mimilk lk is is knknowown n fofor r itits s ririchchneness ss in in cacalclciuium m anand d ththus us ititss importance for the bones. %side from this, it also contains more than & other  importance for the bones. %side from this, it also contains more than & other  essential nutrients. #t contains proteins that are important to fight diseases, renew essential nutrients. #t contains proteins that are important to fight diseases, renew cells, build muscles and maintain healthy hair and nails, carbohydrates which gives cells, build muscles and maintain healthy hair and nails, carbohydrates which gives

(2)

energy to the body, minerals and vitamins that are essential for good health, for  energy to the body, minerals and vitamins that are essential for good health, for  stronger bones, for more energy, for a stronger immune system and for healthier  stronger bones, for more energy, for a stronger immune system and for healthier  skin, and fatty acids which are important for body cells, as long as they are taken in skin, and fatty acids which are important for body cells, as long as they are taken in mo

modederratate e 'u'uanantititities es ((http)**www.http)**www.nestle-family.nestle-family.com*nutrition-for-all*engliscom*nutrition-for-all*english*why-is- h*why-is-milk-good-for-your-health+/0.asp

milk-good-for-your-health+/0.asp, 1etrieved %ugust /, /234., 1etrieved %ugust /, /234.

#t is within this contet that the researchers tried eploring the possibility of  #t is within this contet that the researchers tried eploring the possibility of  utili5ing old or spoiled milk, which is usually thrown as waste because it may cause utili5ing old or spoiled milk, which is usually thrown as waste because it may cause diarrhea and food poisoning, to produce strong natural glue by employing the diarrhea and food poisoning, to produce strong natural glue by employing the principle of recycling. !ence, this study was undertaken.

principle of recycling. !ence, this study was undertaken.

Statement of the Problem Statement of the Problem

The study has been undertaken to assess the effectiveness of using old and The study has been undertaken to assess the effectiveness of using old and spoiled milk as raw material in

spoiled milk as raw material in the production of natural glue.the production of natural glue. 6pecifically,

6pecifically, it attempted to it attempted to answer the following 'uesanswer the following 'uestion)tion) 2.

2. "an old and spoi"an old and spoiled milled milk be k be comcombinbined with othed with other raw mateer raw materiarials to produls to producece strong natural glue7

strong natural glue7 /.

/. WhaWhat is the degret is the degree of accepte of acceptabiabilitlity of the glue mady of the glue made out of old and spoie out of old and spoiledled milk to consumers in terms of)

milk to consumers in terms of) a.

a. apappepeararanancce8e8 b.

b. vvisiscocosisityty88 c.

c. ssmmeellll, , anandd d.

d. adadhehesisive ve ststrerengtngth7h7 9.

9. #s the pro#s the produced natduced natural gluural glue cheaper te cheaper than the comhan the commercimercially avaially available gllable glue7ue7 Ba!c "umpt!on

Ba!c "umpt!on 2.

2. That olThat old and spoild and spoiled milk caed milk can be n be comcombinbined wited with other raw mah other raw materterialials in s in toto produce natural glue.

(3)

energy to the body, minerals and vitamins that are essential for good health, for  energy to the body, minerals and vitamins that are essential for good health, for  stronger bones, for more energy, for a stronger immune system and for healthier  stronger bones, for more energy, for a stronger immune system and for healthier  skin, and fatty acids which are important for body cells, as long as they are taken in skin, and fatty acids which are important for body cells, as long as they are taken in mo

modederratate e 'u'uanantititities es ((http)**www.http)**www.nestle-family.nestle-family.com*nutrition-for-all*engliscom*nutrition-for-all*english*why-is- h*why-is-milk-good-for-your-health+/0.asp

milk-good-for-your-health+/0.asp, 1etrieved %ugust /, /234., 1etrieved %ugust /, /234.

#t is within this contet that the researchers tried eploring the possibility of  #t is within this contet that the researchers tried eploring the possibility of  utili5ing old or spoiled milk, which is usually thrown as waste because it may cause utili5ing old or spoiled milk, which is usually thrown as waste because it may cause diarrhea and food poisoning, to produce strong natural glue by employing the diarrhea and food poisoning, to produce strong natural glue by employing the principle of recycling. !ence, this study was undertaken.

principle of recycling. !ence, this study was undertaken.

Statement of the Problem Statement of the Problem

The study has been undertaken to assess the effectiveness of using old and The study has been undertaken to assess the effectiveness of using old and spoiled milk as raw material in

spoiled milk as raw material in the production of natural glue.the production of natural glue. 6pecifically,

6pecifically, it attempted to it attempted to answer the following 'uesanswer the following 'uestion)tion) 2.

2. "an old and spoi"an old and spoiled milled milk be k be comcombinbined with othed with other raw mateer raw materiarials to produls to producece strong natural glue7

strong natural glue7 /.

/. WhaWhat is the degret is the degree of accepte of acceptabiabilitlity of the glue mady of the glue made out of old and spoie out of old and spoiledled milk to consumers in terms of)

milk to consumers in terms of) a.

a. apappepeararanancce8e8 b.

b. vvisiscocosisityty88 c.

c. ssmmeellll, , anandd d.

d. adadhehesisive ve ststrerengtngth7h7 9.

9. #s the pro#s the produced natduced natural gluural glue cheaper te cheaper than the comhan the commercimercially avaially available gllable glue7ue7 Ba!c "umpt!on

Ba!c "umpt!on 2.

2. That olThat old and spoild and spoiled milk caed milk can be n be comcombinbined wited with other raw mah other raw materterialials in s in toto produce natural glue.

(4)

/.

/. That thThat the produe produced gluced glue has high degree has high degree of e of accaccepteptabiabilitlity to y to conconsumsumers iners in terms of appearance, viscosity, smell and adhesive strength.

terms of appearance, viscosity, smell and adhesive strength. 9.

9. ThThat the at the glglue ue frfrom old om old anand d spspoioileled d mimilk is lk is chcheaeaper thaper than n itits s cocommmmerercicialal counterpart.

counterpart.

..Ob#ect!$e of the StudyOb#ect!$e of the Study 2.

2. TTo deto determinermine the effee the effectivectiveness of old and spness of old and spoiled mioiled milk as raw matlk as raw material in terial in thehe production of natural glue.

production of natural glue. /.

/. TTo asseo assess the degree of consuss the degree of consumermers: accs: accepteptabiabilitlity on y on the prothe produceduced glue ind glue in terms of tear appearance, viscosity, smell, and adhesive strength.

terms of tear appearance, viscosity, smell, and adhesive strength. 9.

9. TTo condo conduct cost benuct cost benefiefit analyt analysis to comparsis to compare e the cost of produthe cost of productiction of on of thethe natural glue made out of old and spoiled milk and the commercially available natural glue made out of old and spoiled milk and the commercially available glue.

glue.

S!gn!f!cance of the Study S!gn!f!cance of the Study

The result of this study is deemed beneficial to the following groups of  The result of this study is deemed beneficial to the following groups of  people)

people) T

To o GluGlue e ManManufaufactucturerrers. s. They They wiwill ll be be provprovideided d witwith h checheap ap altalternernatiative ve rawraw materials in the production of glue which help them minimi5e their ependitures materials in the production of glue which help them minimi5e their ependitures while increasing their profits8

while increasing their profits8 T

To o ;nv;nviroironmenmentantal l %d%dvocvocateates. s. The The resresult ult of of thithis s stustudy dy wilwill l supsupporport t thetheir ir  adv

advocacocacy y of of redreduciucing ng envenviroironmenmentantal l polpollutlution ion by by empemployloying ing the the priprincipnciples les of of  recycling.

(5)

To the 6ociety. #f this product is found to be effective, then old and spoiled To the 6ociety. #f this product is found to be effective, then old and spoiled milk which is usually thrown away will turn out an economic resource that would milk which is usually thrown away will turn out an economic resource that would contribute to the economic well-being of the society8 and

contribute to the economic well-being of the society8 and

To Future 1esearchers. $ther researchers would be encouraged to discover  To Future 1esearchers. $ther researchers would be encouraged to discover  economic benefits from other potential raw materials.

economic benefits from other potential raw materials.

Scope and %!m!tat!on of the Study Scope and %!m!tat!on of the Study

The study dealt with the creation of a domestic product out of old and spoiled The study dealt with the creation of a domestic product out of old and spoiled milk. $ther necessary raw materials of minimal proportions were used to bring milk. $ther necessary raw materials of minimal proportions were used to bring about the desired product.

about the desired product.

1esults of the study were delimited to the feasibility of the eternal use of the 1esults of the study were delimited to the feasibility of the eternal use of the produced natural glue which has been tested by consumers via the "onsumer  produced natural glue which has been tested by consumers via the "onsumer   %cceptability

 %cceptability 6urvey. 6urvey. #t #t was was etended etended by by comparing comparing the the cost cost of of production production of of thethe natural glue to its commercial counterpart through

natural glue to its commercial counterpart through cost benefit analysis.cost benefit analysis.

Conceptual &rame'ork Conceptual &rame'ork

The study focused on

The study focused on deterdetermining the potentimining the potential use al use of old of old or spoiled milk asor spoiled milk as raw material in the production of strong natural glue. Few people have eplored the raw material in the production of strong natural glue. Few people have eplored the possibilities of using this material in combination with other raw materials to create a possibilities of using this material in combination with other raw materials to create a useful product.

useful product. Th

This is ststudy udy mamade de ususe e of of ththe e #n#npuput-t-<r<roceocessss-$-$ututput put (#(#<$<$4 4 momodedel l of of goagoall acco

(6)

secondarily, other raw materials necessary to create a domestic product in the form of natural glue.

The process involved the production of glue from old milk, white vinegar, baking soda and water. =uality testing of the produced glue in comparison with the commercial glue was done via the "onsumer:s %cceptability 6urvey. To determine its comparative advantage in terms of cost of production, cost benefit analysis had been undertaken.

 %s a result, the researchers were able to produce a strong natural glue with old or spoiled milk as its main raw material.

To conclude the flow of the paradigm and for proper assessment of the entire study, the feedback through a broken line was sent back to the input and the process for suggestions to be made from the results of the study.

To understand the conceptual framework of the study, a paradigm is presented on the net page.

$>T<>T <1$";66 #?<>T <roduction of ?atural Glue "onsumer:s  %cceptability 6urvey

"ost @enefit %nalysis $il or 6poiled Milk

White Ainegar  @aking 6oda

Water 

(7)

&!gure 1

Reearch Parad!gm

Def!n!t!on of Term

To have a better perspective of the contents of the study, some of the terms are hereby defined either authoritatively or operationally as follows)

 %dhesive 6trength. The term refers to the ability of an adhesive to stick to a surface and bond two surfaces together (https)**www.corrosionpedia.com*definition* &*adhesive-strength4. %s used in this study, the term refers to the ability of the glue to bond two surfaces of bond papers.

 %ppearance. The term refers to the way that someone, or something, looks (http)**www.yourdictionary.com*appearance4. %s used in this study, the term means the visual perception of the survey respondents as to the color and overall look of  the natural glue under study.

"urds. The term refers to a substance consisting mainly of casein and the like, obtained from milk by coagulation (http)**www.dictionary.com*browse*curd4. %s

(8)

used in this study, the term refers to the solid that remained a miture of old or  spoiled milk and vinegar was heated. This was used in the production of natural glue.

?atural Glue. The term refers to a strong li'uid adhesive obtained by boiling collagenous animal parts such a bones, hides and hooves into a hard gelatin and then adding water (http)**www.thefreedictionary.com*glue4. %s used in this study, the term refers to the product made from old and spoiled milk, white vinegar, baking powder and water and used as adhesive.

6ample %. The term refers to the natural glue produced from the combination of old or spoiled milk, white vinegar, baking soda, and water.

6ample @. The term refers to the commercial glue (;lmer:s glue4 which was used to compare the characteristics of the produced glue from its commercial counterpart.

6mell. The term refers to the 'uality of odor or scent perceived by the nose through the process of smelling (http)**www.dictionary.com*browse*smell4. %s used in this study, the term refers to the scent or odor of the glue samples as perceived by the respondents.

Aiscosity. The viscosity of a li'uid corresponds to the informal concept of  DthicknessD, resistance of a fluid to a change in shape, or movement of neighboring portions relative to one another (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viscosity). Aiscosity denotes opposition to flow. The reciprocal of the viscosity is called the fluidity, a measure of the ease of flow. Molasses, for eample, has a greater viscosity than water . @ecause part of a fluid that is forced to move carries along to some

(9)

etent adEacent parts, viscosity may be thought of as internal friction between the molecules8 such friction opposes the development of  velocity differences within a fluid ( http://global.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic   /630!"/#iscosity).  %s used in this study, the term refers to the measure of how the sample glues flow and felt on the hands of the survey respondents.

Whey. The term refers to the li'uid remaining after milk has been curdled and strained.

Chapter (

(10)

 This chapter presents the literature and studies related to the present study and believed to be of signicant in providing bacground as a guide to the researchers in conceptuali!ing" discussing and interpreting the data of the study#

Related Literature

Glue is a sticky material, usually a li'uid, that can stick two or more things together. Glue can be made from plant or animal parts, or it can be made from oil-based chemicals. The first glues may have been natural li'uids that come out of trees when they are cut. ater people learned to make glue by boiling animal feet, cartilage or bones. 6ome very strong glues were first made from fish bones, rubber  or milk (https)**simple.wikipedia.org*wiki*Glue, 1etrieved on %ugust /, /234..

6imple glue can be made at home by miing wheat flour and water. This glue will stick pieces of paper together. Many kinds of art can be made using glue.  % collage is a work of art made by using glue to stick colored things onto paper . 6ome glue can be used to keep water out of boats, buildings or vehicles. #n this case the glue may be called caulk. 6ome man-made materials, including wood-like materials, are made using glues to bind together small pieces of material or powders (https)**simple.wikipedia.org*wiki*Glue, 1etrieved on %ugust /, /234.

While many types of glue are safe, certain kinds of glue contain strong-smelling chemicals. 6ome people sniff  these glues to get high. 6ometimes people

(11)

breathe in the vapors by mistake. This is a very bad idea because these chemicals are often poisons and may cause brain damage or  illness. Glue can also be made from rice or rice flour ( https)**simple.wikipedia.org*wiki*Glue, 1etrieved on %ugust /, /234.

 %dhesive may be used interchangeably with glue, cement, mucilage, or paste (<ike, /294, and is any substance applied to one surface, or both surfaces, of two separate items that binds them together and resists their  separation. %dEectives may be used in conEunction with the word adhesiveH to describe properties based on the substanceIs physical or chemical form, the type of  materials Eoined, or conditions under which it is applied (Cinloch, 2&J04.

The use of adhesives offers many advantages over binding techni'ues such as sewing, mechanical fastening, thermal bonding, etc. These include the ability to bind different materials together, to distribute stress more efficiently across the Eoint, the cost effectiveness of an easily mechani5ed process, an improvement in aesthetic design, and increased design fleibility. Bisadvantages of adhesive use include decreased stability at high temperatures, relative weakness in bonding large obEects with a small bonding surface area, and greater difficulty in separating obEects during testing. %dhesives are typically organi5ed by the method of adhesion. These are then organi5ed into reactive and non-reactive adhesives, which refer to whether the adhesive chemically reacts in order to harden. %lternatively they can be organi5ed by whether the raw stock is of natural or synthetic origin, or by their  starting physical phase (Cinloch, 2&J04.

(12)

 %dhesives may be found naturally or produced synthetically. The earliest human use of adhesive-like substances was approimately /, years ago. The first references to adhesives in literature first appeared in approimately / @";. The Greeks and 1omans made great contributions to the development of  adhesives. #n ;urope, glue was not widely used until the period 2K20 ";. From then until the 2&s increases in adhesive use and discovery were relatively gradual. $nly since the last century has the development of synthetic adhesives accelerated rapidly and innovation in the field continues to the present (Ma55a, et al, /34.

The birch-bark-tar adhesive is a simple, one-component adhesive. %lthough sticky enough, plant-based adhesives are brittle and vulnerable to environmental conditions. The first use of compound adhesives was discovered in 6ibudu, 6outh  %frica. !ere, 0,-year-old stone segments that were once inserted in ae hafts were discovered covered with an adhesive composed of plant gum and red ochre (natural iron oide4 as adding ochre to plant gum produces a stronger product and protects the gum from disintegrating under wet conditions (Wadley, et al, /&4. The ability to produce stronger adhesives allowed middle stone age humans to attach stone segments to sticks in greater variations, which led to the development of new tools (Wadley, /24.

More recent eamples of adhesive use by prehistoric humans have been found at the burial sites of ancient tribes. %rchaeologists studying the sites found that approimately 3, years ago the tribesmen had buried their dead together 

(13)

with food found in broken clay pots repaired with tree resins (;bnesaEEad, /24. %nother investigation by archaeologists uncovered the use of bituminous cements to fasten ivory eyeballs to statues in @abylonian temples dating to approimately  @"; (Mittal L <i55i, /94.

#n /, a paper revealed the discovery of a ,/-year-old man nicknamed the DTyrolean #cemanD or Dt5iD, who was preserved in a glacier near the %ustria-#taly border. 6everal of his belongings were found with him including two arrows with flint arrowheads and a copper hatchet, each with evidence of organic glue used to connect the stone or metal parts to the wooden shafts. The glue was analy5ed as pitch, which re'uires the heating of tar during its production. The retrieval of this tar re'uires a transformation of birch bark by means of heat, in a process known as pyrolysis (6auter, /4.

The development of modern adhesives began in 23& with the founding of  the first commercial glue plant in !olland. This plant produced glues from animal hides (Mittal L <i55i, /94. #n 20, the first @ritish glue patent was issued for fish glue. The following decades of the net century witnessed the manufacture of  casein glues in German and 6wiss factories (;bnesaEEad, /24. #n 2J03, the first >6 patent (number 2J9,/4 was issued to the 1oss brothers for the production of  casein glue (1oss L 1oss, 2J034.

The 2&/s, 2&9s, and 2&s witnessed great advances in the development and production of new plastics and resins due to the First and 6econd World Wars. These advances greatly improved the development of adhesives by allowing the

(14)

use of newly developed materials that ehibited a variety of properties. With changing needs and ever evolving technology, the development of new synthetic adhesives continues to the present (;bnesaEEad, /24. !owever, due to their low cost, natural adhesives are still more commonly used ((Mittal L <i55i, /94.

Glues are part of a larger family called adhesives. The two classes are distinguished by the fact that glue comes from organic compounds while adhesives are chemical-based. %dhering materials called epoies, caulks, or sealants are also chemical compounds that have special additives to give them properties suitable for  particular Eobs or applications (http)**www.madehow.com*Aolume-*Glue.html , 1etrieved 6eptember /, /234.

Glue came into being when ancient tribes discovered that the bones, hides, skin, sinew, and other connective tissues from animals could be processed to remove collagen, the protein in these tissues. The collagen was sticky and was useful for holding things together. Milk solids, known as casein, and blood albumin can also be used as a basis for glue. Bried serum from cowsI blood yields albumin that coagulates or clumps together when it is heated and becomes insoluble in water (http)**www.madehow.com*Aolume-*Glue.html , 1etrieved 6eptember /, /234.

Fish glue was also made from the heads, bones, and skin of fish, but this glue tended to be too thin and less sticky. @y eperimenting, early man discovered that the air bladders of various fish produced much more satisfactory glue that was

(15)

white and tasteless. #t eventually was named isinglass or ichthocol (http)**www.madehow.com*Aolume-*Glue.html , 1etrieved 6eptember /, /234.

 There are three classes of substance that are called glues and that do not contain chemicals, compounds, or high-tech additives8 these are bone glue, hide or  skin glue, and fish glue. Technically, other sticky substances are adhesives, gums, or cements, although consumers tend to use these terms interchangeably (http)**www.madehow.com*Aolume-*Glue.html , 1etrieved 6eptember /, /234.

<lants have also been used to produce glues collectively called vegetable glues. These materials are dispersible or soluble in water and are usually made from the starches that compose many grains and vegetables. The natural gums include agar, from colloids in marine plants, algin that is derived from seaweed, and gum %rabic, an etract of the acacia tree (also known as the gum tree4. The substance called marine glue is used to caulk seams, but it consists of tar or pitch and is not truly glue (http)**www.madehow.com*Aolume-*Glue.html , 1etrieved 6eptember /, /234.

Glue manufacturers obtain bones and tissues of animals from slaughterhouses, tanneries, and meat packing companies8 it is no coincidence that the worldIs largest glue manufacturer is the dairy called @orden "ompany. The animal remains that are the raw materials for glue may include ears, tails, scraps of  hide or skin, scrapings from the fleshy sides of hides, tendons, bones, and feet. 6imilarly, manufacturers of fish glue obtain bones, heads, scales, and skins of fish

(16)

from canneries and other processing plants (http)**www.madehow.com*Aolume-*Glue.html, 1etrieved 6eptember /, /234.

Glue can be made from casein. "asein is the name for a family of  related phosphoproteins. These proteins are commonly found in mammalian milk, making up JN of the proteins in cowIs milk and between /N and N of the proteins in human milk (Cun5 L onnerdal, 2&&4.

"asein-based glues, formulated from casein, water, hydrated lime and sodium hydroide were popular for woodworking, including for  aircraft. "asein glue is also used in transformer manufacturing (specifically transformer board4 due to its oil permeability. While largely replaced with synthetic resins, casein-based glues still have a use in certain niche applications, such as laminating fireproof doors and the labeling of bottles (Tracto, /34.

Related Stud!e

 % study conducted by @ayoyo (n.d.4 entitled, %dhesive Glue from "amansi TrunkH aimed to produce glue from camansi tree that is found anywhere in the <hilippines. 1esult showed that there is no significant difference between the glue from camansi trunk as compared to the commercial glue in terms of color, teture, odor, drying period and spoiling period. The color of the glue from camansi is off  white but this may be due to lack of advanced e'uipment to make the color very white.

(17)

>mar, et al (n.d.4 conducted a study bearing the title, @etel nut (areca catechu4 tannin as an adhesiveH to determine the amount of tannin yield from betel nut etract, if the tannin adhesive could substitute the commercial wood glue, and compared the adhesive strength of the eperimental adhesive and commercial wood glue. 1esult showed that about N of tannin could be produced. The adhesive was comparable with the commercially produced wood glue. % test for  adhesive strength showed no significant difference among the three adhesives. ;perimental adhesive could bind other materials aside from wood. @ased on the gathered results, the difference of the means before and after eposure to seawater  and tap water between commercial adhesive and eperimental mitures % and @ is less than 2 which showed that there is no significant difference, then the ?ull hypothesis was accepted. Therefore, adhesive from betel nut tannin could be an ecellent substitute to commercial and synthesi5ed adhesive.

Tsutomu ?oguchi of the 6ony 1esearch "enter found that the oil from orange peels would dissolve polystyrene. @y using a product called imoene, that contains .N of the orange peel oil ?oguchi found that the polystyrene would break down into a li'uid form that created a very strong glue and can be used to create styrene pellets that go back into the production of more polystyrene (http)**www.brighthub.com*environment*green-living*articles*/23.asp, 1etrieved 6eptember /, /234.

 % study bearing the title, Milk "asein as an %lternative #ngredient for GlueH found out that the casein from milk is an effective alternative ingredient in glue

(18)

making (https)**www.scribd.com*doc*3399&J3*#nvestigatory-<roEect, 1etrieved 6eptember /, /234.

The studies of @ayoyo, et al, >mar, et al, and ?oguchi bear similarity with the present study because they all dealt with adhesives. !owever, they differ in the materials used in the production of adhesives.

Chapter , -)T.ODO%O/0

This chapter includes the description of the materials and e'uipment, research design, locale of the study, data gathering procedures and the statistical treatment of the data.

-ater!al and )u!pment

The materials needed in the production of the natural glue are as follows)  m old or spoiled milk, 2 m white vinegar, 9 g baking soda, and 2 m distilled water.

(19)

The e'uipment used are the following) graduated cylinder for measuring the volumes of milk, vinegar, and water8 weighing scale for measuring the weight of the baking soda, stove and pan for cooking the glue, ladle for stirring the glue, basin and strainer for separating the milk curds from the whey, container for storing the glue, and commercial glue for comparison of their characteristics.

Reearch De!gn

The study made use of the descriptive normative survey method. This was used to address the problem on the degree of consumers: acceptability of the produced natural glue.

 %ccording to 6anche5, this method is used in the description of phenomena in contrast in ascertaining what caused them and what their values and significance are. The researchers believe that such methods are the most suited to further the study because it focuses on the analysis of the perceptions of the respondents as regard the characteristics of the natural glue made from old or spoiled milk as compared to the commercial glue.

Reearch %ocale

The study was conducted at 6an #sidro "entral 6chool. The said school is one of the ++ public elementary schools in 6an #sidro Bistrict. #t is located at @arangay ++++++++++ in the municipality of 6an #sidro, Bivision of #sabela.

(20)

To bring about the desired outcome of the study, the researchers made use of the following research instruments)

6urvey 6heet. The most appropriate instrument to assess feasibility and marketability of a product is the use of a survey sheet. #n this study, a survey sheet was used to find out the degree of acceptability of the product by the consumers in terms of appearance, viscosity, smell and adhesive strength.

#nformal #nterview. To verify and clarify vague answers or responses, an informal interview was employed to the respondents who took part in the survey.

Data /ather!ng Procedure

!ere is the step by step procedure in the production of natural glue and the data gathering procedures in order to generate results)

"2 Collect!on and Preparat!on of Ra' -ater!al

$ld and spoiled milk was gathered from residents of 6an #sidro, #sabela. The collection was placed in a large clean container and was refrigerated to arrest its further spoilage. % total of  m were utili5ed in the production of natural glue. White vinegar, distilled water and baking soda were purchased at 6antiago "ity.

B2 Preparat!on of the )u!pment !n /lue Product!on

The researchers prepared a medium-si5ed pan and a stove for  cooking, a ladle for stirring, a basin and a strainer for separating the milk curd from whey, a graduated cylinder for measuring the volumes of milk, white

(21)

vinegar and water, and a weighing scale for taking the weight of the baking soda.

C2 Product!on of Natural /lue

>sing a graduated cylinder,  m of old or spoiled milk was measured. #t was placed in a medium-si5ed pan and was heated until warm. Fifteen (24 m of white vinegar was then added to the warm milk. #t was further heated by stirring occasionally until the milk separated from its curds and whey. Then, the miture was strained keeping the curds or the solid part. The curds were then molded into one big slimy ball.

 %gain, the ball of curds was in a clean pan and 9 g of baking soda and 2 m of water was added to it. The miture was heated up until it started bubbling. The stove was turned off after achieving the desired consistency of the glue. The produced glue was allowed to cool before it was placed in a clean container.

D2 3ual!ty Tet!ng of the Produced /lue

The 'uality and characteristics of the glue produced was tested through "onsumers: %cceptability 6urvey. Twenty individuals in various walks of life were randomly selected as respondents. They were asked to assess the 'uality of the produced glue and compare it with the available glue being commercially marketed. %fter which, they were asked to rate the samples in terms of appearance, viscosity, smell, and adhesive strength using the prepared survey form (see %ppendi on page ++++ 4.

(22)

To determine the perceptions of the consumers on the appearance of  the sample glues, -point ikert scale was utili5ed. The point and 'ualitatively description is hereby given)

<oint =ualitative Bescription "haracteristics

 ;cellent ;tremely good to look at

9 Good Good to look at

/ <oor <oor appearance

2 Aery <oor Aery poor appearance

To assess the perceptions of the consumers on the viscosity of the glue samples, -point ikert scale was utili5ed. The point and 'ualitatively description is given below)

<oint =ualitative Bescription "haracteristics

 ;cellent ;tremely good viscosity

9 Good Good viscosity

/ <oor <oor viscosity

2 Aery <oor Aery poor viscosity

To know the perceptions of the consumers on the smell of the sample glues, -point ikert scale was utili5ed. The point and 'ualitatively description is hereby given)

<oint =ualitative Bescription "haracteristics

 ;cellent ;tremely good smell

9 Good Good smell

(23)

2 Aery <oor Aery poor smell

To assess the perceptions of the consumers on the adhesive strength of the glue samples, -point ikert scale was utili5ed. The point and 'ualitatively description is given on the net page.

<oint =ualitative Bescription

"haracteristics

 ;cellent ;tremely strong adhesive strength

9 Good 6trong adhesive strength

/ <oor <oor adhesive strength

2 Aery <oor Aery poor adhesive strength

Stat!t!cal Treatment of Data

The data gathered from the survey were processed using the weighted mean. The range and 'ualitative description is presented below)

1ange =ualitative

Bescription

"haracteristics

9./3 K . ;cellent ;tremely good to look at, ;tremely good viscosity, ;tremely good smell, ;tremely strong adhesive strength

/.2 K 9./ Good Good to look at, Good viscosity, Good smell, 6trong adhesive strength

2.03 K /. <oor   <oor appearance, <oor viscosity, <oor smell, <oor  adhesive strength

2. K 2.0 Aery <oor   Aery poor appearance, Aery poor viscosity, Aery poor smell, Aery poor adhesive strength

(24)

Cot Benef!t "naly!

#n order to answer problem number , the researchers conducted cost benefit analysis. The amount incurred in the production of natural glue was compared to the cost of purchasing commercial glue. 1esult of the analysis is presented in Table 9 on page /0.

&lo'chart of /eneral Procedure

&!gure (

&lo'chart of /eneral Procedure "ollection and <reparation of 1aw Materials

<roduction of ?atural Glue

=uality Testing through "onsumers: %cceptability 6urvey

"ost @enefit %nalysis

 %nalysis and #nterpretation of Bata

"onclusion

(25)

Chapter 4

PR)S)NT"TION5 "N"%0SIS "ND INT)RPR)T"TION O& D"T"

This chapter elucidates in tabular form the data gathered. %nalysis after  every result is presented in this chapter.

Table 1

Comb!nat!on of Old and Spo!led -!lk '!th Other Ra' -ater!al !n the Product!on of Natural /lue

Ra' -ater!al 3uant!ty

$ld and 6poiled Milk  m

White Ainegar 2 m

Water 2 m

@aking6oda 9g

*olume 6 788 m%

Table 2 shows the raw materials combined in the production of natural glue. #t reveals that to produce a 3 m volume of natural glue,  m old or spoiled milk, 2 m white vinegar, 2 m water, and 9 g of baking soda were used.

(26)

Table (

Reult of the Conumer "cceptab!l!ty Sur$ey a to "ppearance5 *!co!ty5 Smell and "dhe!$e Strength

Conumer "ppearance *!co!ty Smell "dhe!$e Strength " B " B " B " B

2. ;lementary 6chool <rincipal 9  9  9 9  

/.@usinesswoman 9 9 9  9   

9.Farmer 9  9  9 9 9 

.@arangay6ecretary     9 9  

.!ousewife     9 9  

3.Bentist 9  9  9   

0.6ari-sari 6tore$wner 9 9  9  9  

J.?urse 9  9  9 9  

&. ;lementary 6chool Teacher  9 9  / 9 9 

2.<harmacist /  9  /   

22."ollege 6tudent  9      

2/.<oliceman     9   

29. ;lementary 6chool <upil   9     

2.!igh6chool6tudent 9    9   

2.<unong@arangay        

23.!igh6choolTeacher 9 9 9  9   

20.FishAendor      9  

2J."arpenter    9 9  9 

2&.Tricycle Briver   9  9   

/.FishAendor 9    9   

Weighted Mean 9. 9.0 9. 9.& 9.2 9.3 9.J . #nterpretation ;cellent ;cellent ;cellent ;cellent Good ;cellent ;cellent ;cellent $egend:  A – Natural Glue from Old/Spoiled Milk B – Commercial Glue

(27)

The result of the "onsumers %cceptability 6urvey is presented in Table / in the previous page. #t can be gleaned from the table that consumers had high degree of acceptance on the produced natural glue as evidenced by the ;cellent results in appearance (9.4, viscosity (9.4 and adhesive strength (9.J4 and very good in smell (9.24. The commercial glue has higher weighted means across all the four  characteristics surveyed but the ikert 6cale shows that their 'ualitative descriptions were more or less the same, ecept for smell. This is an indication of  consumers: high degree of acceptance of the glue produced from old and spoiled milk when marketed or sold.

&!gure ,

/raph!cal Repreentat!on of the +e!ghted -ean of the Conumer9 "cceptab!l!ty Sur$ey

%&&'%(%)*' +,-*.-,T/ -0' %'-,+' -T(')T $ $#5 1 1#5 2 2#5 3 3#5 4 %  egend)

 % K ?atural Glue from $ld Milk @ K "ommercial Glue

(28)

Table ,

Cot Benef!t "naly!

-ater!al -ater!al Pr!ce :!n

Php;

"mount Needed

"ctual Cot of  -ater!al Ued :!n Php; Cot of  Commerc!al /lue :!n Php; $ld and 6poiled Milk  m <hp . (for collecting4 Elmer%s &l'e White Ainegar <hp2J. per 

9 m.

2 m <hp .00 @aking 6oda <hp2. per  

 g. 9 g. <hp &. Water <hp 2. per   99 m 2 m <hp 9.9 abor and <ackaging <hp /. Total 3 m <hp 90.J

Total Cot of Product!on of 188 m% <hp 3.9 <hp 9.

Table 9 presents the comparison of the cost of production of the natural glue and the selling price of its commercial counterpart (;lmer:s glue4. #t reveals that <90.J was the cost of production of 3 m natural glue from old and spoiled milk. The table further reveals that 2 m of the produced glue costs <hp3.9 while a 2 m ;lmer:s glue costs <9.. This indicates that the produced glue is </9.0 or 0&N cheaper than the commercial glue.

(29)

Compar!on of the Cot of Product!on :!n Ph!l!pp!ne peo; of the Natural /lue and Commerc!al /lue

)%T(% ' (.0 . 0, *.00'(*,% ' $ 5 1$ 15 2$ 25 3$ Chapter <

(30)

SU--"R0 O& &INDIN/S5 CONC%USION "ND R)CO--)ND"TIONS

This chapter presents the summary of findings of this research study. #t also includes the conclusion and the recommendations offered by the researcher as drawn out of the findings.

Summary of &!nd!ng

#t was found out that old or spoiled milk can be combined with white vinegar, baking soda and water to produce strong natural glue.

The "onsumers %cceptability 6urvey conducted consumers perceived the natural glue produced from old or spoiled milk and other raw materials to have an ecellent appearance, viscosity and adhesive strength, and very good smell, while the commercial glue was perceive to be ecellent across all the characteristics being surveyed. Furthermore, the commercial glue has higher weighted means across all the four characteristics assessed when compared to the produced natural glue. !owever, the ikert 6cale shows that their 'ualitative descriptions were more or less the same, ecept for smell. This is an indication of consumers: high degree of acceptance of the glue produced when marketed or sold.

"omparing the cost of production of the natural glue and the selling price of  its commercial counterpart, it shows that <hp 90.J was the cost of production of  3 m natural glue from old and spoiled milk, which accounts for <hp3.9 per 2 m, while 2 m commercial glue costs <hp 9.. This implies that the produced glue is </9.0 or 0&N cheaper than the commercial glue.

(31)

@ased on the results and findings of the study, the following conclusions were drawn)

2. $ld or spoiled milk can be utili5ed as raw material in the production of  natural glue.

/. The natural glue from old or spoiled milk has a high degree of  acceptability as compared to its commercial counterpart in terms of  appearance, viscosity, smell, and adhesive strength.

9. The natural old glue is cheaper by </9.0 or 0&N for every 2 m volume as compared to commercial glue.

Recommendat!on

The following recommendations would enhance the economic benefits of old and spoiled milk)

2. <eople are encouraged not to dispose of their old and spoiled milk as it can be utili5ed in the production of natural glue.

/. <eople are encouraged to practice recycling while helping lessen the harmful effects of pollution.

9. Further study along this line is also recommended.

BIB%IO/R"P.0

@ayoyo, Oennilyn, et al (n.d.4. %dhesive Glue from "amansi Trunk. 1etrieved from http)**scinet.dost.gov.ph*union*6how6earch1esult.php7

sP/LfPLpPLPLpagePLsidP2LidP%dhesiveQglueQfromQcamansiQtrunkLMty peP<1$O;"T6 on %ugust /0, /23.

(32)

;bnesaEEad, 6ina (/24. D!istory of %dhesivesD. !andbook of %dhesives and 6urface <reparation ) Technology, %pplications and Manufacturing.  %msterdam) ;lsevier. p. 290.#6@? &0J2900329.

http)**www.madehow.com*Aolume-*Glue.html , 1etrieved 6eptember /, /23

https)**www.scribd.com*doc*3399&J3*#nvestigatory-<roEect, 1etrieved 6eptember  /, /23. http)**www.brighthub.com*environment*green-living*articles*/23.asp, 1etrieved 6ept. /, /23. http)**www.yourdictionary.com*appearance http)**www.dictionary.com*browse*curd4 http)**www.thefreedictionary.com*glue http)**www.dictionary.com*browse*smell http)**en.wikipedia.org*wiki*Aiscosity http)**global.britannica.com*;@checked*topic *39/J*viscosity https)**www.corrosionpedia.com*definition* &*adhesive-strength

Cinloch, %.O. (2&J04. %dhesion and %dhesives ) 6cience and Technology (1eprinted. ed.4. ondon) "hapman and !all. p. 2. #6@? -2/-/0-R.

 Cun5, "8 onnerdal, @ (2&&4. D!uman-milk proteins) analysis of casein and casein subunits by anion-echange chromatography, gel electrophoresis, and specific staining methodsD. %merican Oournal of "linical ?utrition. The  %merican 6ociety for "linical ?utrition. 2 (24) 90K3. <M#B 23JJ3J9.

1etrieved 2 %ugust /23.

Ma55a, <8 Martini, F8 6ala, @8 Magi, M8 "olombini, M8 Giachi, G8 anducci, F8 emorini, "8 Modugno, F8 1ibechini, ; (Oanuary /34. D% new <alaeolithic discovery) tar-hafted stone tools in a ;uropean Mid-<leistocene bone-bearing bedD. Oournal of %rchaeological 6cience. 99 (&4) 292. doi)2. 223*E.Eas./3.2.3.

Mittal, C..8 %. <i55i (/94. D!istorical Bevelopment of %dhesives and %dhesive @ondingD. !andbook of %dhesive Technology (/nd ed., rev. and epanded. ed.4. ?ew Sork) Marcel Bekker, #nc. p. 2. #6@? J/0&J32.

(33)

<ike, 1oscoe (/294. D%dhesiveD. ;ncyclopedia @ritannica $nline. ;ncyclopedia @ritannica #nc. 1etrieved / %ugust /23.

1oss, Oohn L 1oss, "harles (2J034. D#mprovement in <rocesses of <reparing GlueD. >nited 6tates <atent and Trademark $ffice. 1etrieved 2 %ugust /23.

6auter F, Oordis >, Graf %, Werther W, Aarmu5ahttp C. (/4. 6tudies in organic archaeology #) identification of the prehistoric adhesive used by the Tyrolean #cemanH to fi his weapons. %1C#A$", 2)U 09K00

Tracto, %rthur %. (/34. "oatings Materials %nd 6urface "oatings. "1" <ress, pages 2&K0 to 2&K22

>mar, et al (n.d.4. @etel nut (areca catechu4 tannin as an adhesive. 1etrieved from http)**scinet.dost.gov.ph*union*6how6earch1esult.php7

sP/LfPLpPLPLpagePLsidP2LidP@etelQnutQN/JarecaQcatechu

N/&QtanninQasQanQadhesiveLMtypeP<1$@O;"T6 on on %ugust /0, /23. Wadley, yn (2 Oune /24. D"ompound %dhesive Manufacture as a @ehavioral

<roy for "omple "ognition in the Middle 6tone %geD. "urrent  %nthropology. 2 (s24) 6222K622&.doi)2.2J3*3&J93

 Wadley, 8 !odgskiss, T8 Grant, M (Oun /&4. D#mplications for comple cognition from the hafting of tools with compound adhesives in the Middle 6tone %ge, 6outh %fricaD.<roceedings of the ?ational %cademy of 6ciences of the >nited 6tates of %merica. 23(/4) && . @ibcode)/&<?%6.. 23.&&W. doi)2.209*pnas. &&023.#66? /0-J/. <M" /0&&J

(34)
(35)
(36)

CONSU-)RS9 "CC)PT"BI%IT0 SUR*)0 S.))T

?ame (optional4)++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ %ge ) ++++++++++   %ddress) ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 6e) ++++++++++ 

(37)

"urrent Oob*Work) +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 

<lease rate the two products using the following scale)

<oint 6cale =ualitative Bescription

 ./2 K . ;cellent

9 9.2 K ./ Aery Good

/ 2.J2 K /.3 6atisfactory

2 2. K 2.J <oor  

"haracteristics @rand % @rand @

2. %ppearance /. Aiscosity 9. 6mell . %dhesive 6trength  ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 6ignature Bate

(38)

ST"TISTIC"%

CO-PUT"TIONS

Computat!on of the +e!ghted -ean

2. "onsumers: %cceptability 6urvey (%ppearance4 2.2 ?atural Glue made out of $ld or 6poiled Milk

WM P Vf ?

P (  24 Q (9  &4 Q (/  24 /

(39)

P 3& / WM P 9. (;cellent4 2./ "ommercial Glue WM P Vf ? P (  24 Q (9  4 / P 0 / WM P 9.0 (;cellent4

/. "onsumers: %cceptability 6urvey (Aiscosity4

/.2 ?atural Glue made out of $ld or 6poiled Milk WM P Vf ? P (  24 Q (9  24 / P 0 / WM P 9. (;cellent4 /./ "ommercial Glue WM P Vf ? P (  2J4 Q (9  /4 / P 0J / WM P .& (;cellent4

(40)

9. "onsumers: %cceptability 6urvey (6mell4

9.2 ?atural Glue made out of $ld or 6poiled Milk WM P Vf ? P (  4 Q (9  294 Q (/  /4 / P 39 / WM P 9.2 (Good4 2./ "ommercial Glue WM P Vf ? P (  2/4 Q (9  J4 / P 0/ / WM P 9.3 (;cellent4

. "onsumers: %cceptability 6urvey (%dhesive 6trength4 .2 ?atural Glue made out of $ld or 6poiled Milk

WM P Vf ? P (  204 Q (9  94 / P 00 /

(41)

WM P 9.J (;cellent4 ./ "ommercial Glue WM P Vf ? P (  /4 / P J / WM P . (;cellent4

(42)

CURRICU%U- *IT")

CURRICU%U- *IT") ?ame ) ?ickname ) 6e )  %ge )

(43)

 %ddress ) @irthday )  %mbition ) Father:s ?ame ) Mother:s ?ame ) 1eligion ) ?ationality ) "ivil 6tatus ) Motto ) ;ducational %ttainment) ;lementary ) 6econdary )

<erson to be contacted in case of emergency)

CURRICU%U- *IT")

?ame )

?ickname )

6e )

(44)

 %ddress ) @irthday )  %mbition ) Father:s ?ame ) Mother:s ?ame ) 1eligion ) ?ationality ) "ivil 6tatus ) Motto ) ;ducational %ttainment) ;lementary ) 6econdary )

<erson to be contacted in case of emergency)

CURRICU%U- *IT")

?ame )

?ickname )

6e )

(45)

 %ddress ) @irthday )  %mbition ) Father:s ?ame ) Mother:s ?ame ) 1eligion ) ?ationality ) "ivil 6tatus ) Motto ) ;ducational %ttainment) ;lementary ) 6econdary )

References

Related documents