• No results found

Evaluation of Grid Interactive Electric Thermal Storage (GETS) Heaters in Standalone Wind Diesel Systems

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Evaluation of Grid Interactive Electric Thermal Storage (GETS) Heaters in Standalone Wind Diesel Systems"

Copied!
22
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Evaluation of Grid‐Interactive Electric 

Thermal Storage (GETS) Heaters in 

Standalone Wind‐Diesel Systems

2014 Alaska Wind Integration Workshop

March 21, 2014

Richard Wies

Associate Professor 

University of Alaska Fairbanks (UAF) Institute of Northern Engineering (INE)

Co‐Investigators:

Nick Janssen

, Graduate Student, UAF INE

Rorik Peterson

, Associate Professor, UAF INE

This work was supported by: 

1) Alaska Energy Authority‐Emerging Energy Technology Fund Round 1

2) U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences, under 

(2)

Evaluation of Grid‐Interactive Electric 

Thermal Storage (GETS) Heaters in 

Standalone Wind‐Diesel Systems

Goals: Use of Wind Energy

Space Heating & Storage

Grid Frequency Control

GETS Controller Testing

Steffes 2102 Ratings

Laboratory Test Setup

Results: Response to Frequency

Electric‐Thermal Model

Voltage & Frequency 

Dynamics 

Thermal Model

Conclusions (Take‐Aways)

Photo Credit: Steffes Corporation

(3)

Electrothermal Space Heating/Storage: 

Excess Wind to Displace Oil Heating

Masonry Heaters (Steffes Units)

On/off control strategies

Voltage/frequency control

Secondary (Dump) Load

Use of Excess Wind Energy

30%

50%

20%

Fuel Use in Rural Alaska Villages

Electricity

Space Heating

Transportation

Photo Credit: Dennis Meiners, Intelligent Energy Systems

Photo Credit: Steffes Corporation

(4)

Steffes 2102 Heater Ratings

Electric Ratings

Heat Elements: 120 V; 1.33 kW

Blower: 120 V; 30‐100W

Weight

Bricks (16): 176 lbs

Heater: 105 lbs

Storage Capacity

46,062  BTU or 13.5 kWh

Heat Capacity (Bricks) 

0.22 BTU/°F*lb

Temperature Rise 

1100 °F

Loss of Heat through Insulation

2.4 BTU/°F*h

Heat Delivered on Demand

20,000 BTU/h

Photo Credit: Steffes Corporation

(5)

UAF Power Lab Test Setup

(6)
(7)

GETS Controller: 

Programmed Frequency Response

(8)

GETS System Response:

f = 60.5 Hz

4

6

8

10

12

14

57

58

59

60

61

Time (s)

F

re

que

nc

y

(H

z)

Frequency of Voltages

Fan

Fbn

Fcn

4

6

8

10

12

14

2

4

6

8

10

Time (s)

RM

S

Cu

rre

nt

(

A

)

RMS Line Currents

IaRMS

IbRMS

IcRMS

(9)

GETS System Response:

Frequency Rise (60 to 65 Hz)

Frequency

Rise

Time to first

response (s)

0.58

Time to

appropriate

response (s)

1.51

Ramp rate

(Hz/s)

8.00

10

10.5

11

11.5

12

12.5

58

60

62

64

66

68

X: 10.03 Y: 60.5

Time (s)

F

reque

nc

y

(H

z)

Frequency of Voltages

X: 9.984 Y: 60.25 X: 9.809 Y: 59.95

Fan

Fbn

Fcn

10

10.5

11

11.5

12

12.5

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

X: 11.54 Y: 6.018

Time (s)

RM

S

Cu

rr

en

t

RMS Line Currents

X: 10.53 Y: 1.745

IaRMS

IbRMS

IcRMS

(10)

GETS System Response:

Frequency Dip (60.5 to 57 Hz)

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

56

58

60

62

X: 2.16 Y: 60

Time (s)

F

req

uenc

y

(H

z)

Frequency of Voltages

Fan

Fbn

Fcn

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

0

5

10

15

X: 3.506 Y: 8.832

Time (s)

RM

S

Cu

rr

en

t

RMS Line Currents

IaRMS

IbRMS

IcRMS

Frequency

Dip

Time to first

response (s)

0.49

Time to

appropriate

response (s)

1.35

Ramp rate

(Hz/s)

2.67

(11)

GETS System Response: 

Zero & Full ETS Load (Cycling)

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

56

58

60

62

Time (s)

F

req

ue

nc

y

(H

z)

Frequency of Voltages

Fan

Fbn

Fcn

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

0

5

10

15

X: 4.338 Y: 9.53

Time (s)

RM

S

Cu

rr

en

t

RMS Line Currents

X: 3.338 Y: 2.044 X: 13.34 Y: 9.707 X: 12.34 Y: 1.869 X: 7.332 Y: 10.29 X: 6.332 Y: 1.501 X: 10.34 Y: 9.214 X: 9.34 Y: 1.642

IaRMS

IbRMS

IcRMS

(12)

GETS System Response: 

¾ & Full ETS Load (Cycling)

2

4

6

8

10

12

55

60

65

70

Time (s)

F

req

uenc

y

(H

z)

Frequency of Voltages

Fan

Fbn

Fcn

2

4

6

8

10

12

2

4

6

8

10

12

X: 10.51 Y: 8.538

R

M

S

C

ur

rent

RMS Line Currents

X: 9.483 Y: 9.314 X: 7.483 Y: 8.062 X: 6.505 Y: 10.02 X: 4.505 Y: 8.349 X: 3.483 Y: 10.37 X: 1.483 Y: 8.393

IaRMS

IbRMS

IcRMS

(13)

GETS System Response: 

Switching to Engage ETS Load

2.6

2.7

2.8

2.9

3

3.1

3.2

3.3

3.4

59

60

61

62

Time (s)

F

req

ue

nc

y

(H

z)

Frequency of Voltages

Fan

Fbn

Fcn

2.6

2.7

2.8

2.9

3

3.1

3.2

3.3

3.4

8

9

10

11

X: 2.69 Y: 9.76

Time (s)

RM

S

Cu

rre

nt

RMS Line Currents

X: 2.79 Y: 9.163 X: 2.97 Y: 10.08 X: 3.07 Y: 9.496 X: 3.251 Y: 10.54 X: 3.351 Y: 9.883

IaRMS

IbRMS

IcRMS

Off: ~0.1 sec

On: ~0.2 sec

(14)

GETS System Response: 

Switching to Disengage ETS Load

3.2

3.4

3.6

3.8

4

4.2

58.5

59

59.5

60

60.5

61

Time (s)

F

requ

en

cy

(

H

z)

Frequency of Voltages

Fan

Fbn

Fcn

3.2

3.4

3.6

3.8

4

4.2

1

2

3

4

5

RM

S

Curre

nt

X: 3.926Y: 4.373 X: 3.608 Y: 1.574 X: 3.507 Y: 4.389 X: 3.407 Y: 1.491 X: 3.29 Y: 4.421 X: 3.19 Y: 1.368 X: 3.708 Y: 4.421 X: 3.826 Y: 1.698

RMS Line Currents

IaRMS

IbRMS

IcRMS

Off: ~0.1 sec

(15)

Summary of Results: 

Response of GETS Controller

ETS Load Changes:

Discrete ETS Load Levels: apply or remove based on measured frequency f

Cycled ON & OFF: @ two discrete load levels for 60 Hz  f  60.5 Hz 

System Frequency Changes:

Frequency Rise: add load in steps until fully loaded @ 60.5Hz

Frequency Dip: remove load in steps until fully unloaded @ 60Hz

Time Delays:

Delay Time (no ETS load to full ETS load): 1.00 s 

Delay Time (¾ ETS load to full ETS load): 2.00 s 

Controller Switching Times:

Small (< 1 A) ETS Loads: OFF for 0.10 s; ON for 0.20 s

Medium (≈ 3 A) ETS Loads: OFF for 0.10 s; ON for 0.10 s

Photo Credit: Steffes Corporation

(16)

ETS‐Power Systems Integration Laboratory 

(PSIL) Model

(17)

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 -5 0 5 10 15x 10 4 Time (s) P ow er (W } WTG Real Power No ETS Units 5 Units/Phase 10 Units/Phase 15 Units/Phase 20 Units/Phase 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 0.96 0.98 1 1.02 1.04 Time (s) F re que nc y (p u) Bus Frequency No ETS Units 5 Units/Phase 10 Units/Phase 15 Units/Phase 20 Units/Phase 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 400 450 500 550 600 Time (s) V olt age (V ) Bus Voltage No ETS Units 5 Units/Phase 10 Units/Phase 15 Units/Phase 20 Units/Phase 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 0 10 20 30 40 Time (s) R ot or A ngle (° ) SM Rotor Angle No ETS Units 5 Units/Phase 10 Units/Phase 15 Units/Phase 20 Units/Phase

Zoom-in on next slide

(voltage stability)

75 kW

61.2 Hz

550 V with 15 units

125 kW

Multiple ETS‐PSIL Model Results 

(60‐60.5 Hz; 0.1 sec hold) 

(18)

8.5 9 9.5 10 10.5 11 11.5 12 12.5 -5 0 5 10 15x 10 4 Time (s) P ow er (W } WTG Real Power No ETS Units 5 Units/Phase 10 Units/Phase 15 Units/Phase 20 Units/Phase 8.5 9 9.5 10 10.5 11 11.5 12 12.5 400 450 500 550 600 V olt ag e (V ) Bus Voltage Time (s) No ETS Units 5 Units/Phase 10 Units/Phase 15 Units/Phase 20 Units/Phase 20 30 40 or An gl e (°) SM Rotor Angle No ETS Units 5 Units/Phase 10 Units/Phase 15 Units/Phase 9.4 9.6 9.8 10 10.2 10.4 10.6 10.8 11 11.2 11.4 0.99 1 1.01 1.02 1.03 F requ enc y (pu) Bus Frequency Time (s) No ETS Units 5 Units/Phase 10 Units/Phase 15 Units/Phase 20 Units/Phase

61.2 Hz

550 V with 15 units

125 kW

65.6 kW

Multiple ETS‐PSIL Model Results 

(60‐60.5 Hz; 0.1 sec hold) 

(19)
(20)

Excess Wind to Electric Heat

Displace oil heat & storage potential

Wind‐Diesel System Stability

GETS could assist with frequency regulation

Effect on voltage stability with multiple ETS loads

Further Investigation

Effect of multiple GETS units coming “ON” at same time

Distributed control among GETS units

Thermal characteristics & possible improvements?

On‐site manufacture of bricks?

Conclusions (Take Aways)

(21)

Questions?

Contact Info:

Richard Wies, Ph.D., P.E.

Electrical and Computer Engineering

Email: [email protected]

Phone: (907) 474‐7071

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐

Rorik Peterson, Ph.D.

Mechanical Engineering

University of Alaska Fairbanks

Email: [email protected]

Phone: (907) 474‐5593

The Heat is 

ON

in the Arctic!!

(22)

Steffes 2105 Heater Ratings

Electric Ratings

Heat Elements: 240 V; 6.0 kW, 7.5 kW, or 9.0 kW

Blower: 120 V; 30‐100W

Weight

Bricks (40): 440 lbs

Heater: 145 lbs

Storage Capacity

115,155 BTU or 33.75 kWh

Heat Capacity (Bricks) 

0.22 BTU/°F*lb

Temperature Rise 

1100 °F

Loss of Heat through Insulation

2.4 BTU/°F*h

Heat Delivered on Demand

20,000 BTU/h

Photo Credit: Steffes Corporation

References

Related documents

( 2016 ) identi- fied limited research that had examined the co-occurrence of problem gambling and IPV; however, the best available esti- mates from studies of community and

SIP/AIP implementation attained the goals and objectives relevant to school performance indicators.. Republic of

New organisations also moved into the field, notably Battersea Polytechnic, which had been training male sanitary inspectors in its evening department since the late

Literature review and survey was carried out to identify the barriers and issues of BIM, construction project processes that involved BIM implementation as well

People with strong habits who made action plans to engage in physical activity or limit or interrupt sedentary behavior would engage in less physical activity or more

These results highlight the need to include technical cooperation and its e¤ect on the project’s probability of success into the management’s incentive scheme to ensure

Almighty God have mercy on you, forgive you all your sins through our Lord Jesus Christ, strengthen you in all goodness, and by the power of the Holy Spirit keep you in eternal

This research aims to classify the female consumer demographic segments linked by impulsive buying, to determine the effect of visual merchandising on impulsive buying, and