Evaluation of Grid‐Interactive Electric
Thermal Storage (GETS) Heaters in
Standalone Wind‐Diesel Systems
2014 Alaska Wind Integration Workshop
March 21, 2014
Richard Wies
Associate Professor
University of Alaska Fairbanks (UAF) Institute of Northern Engineering (INE)
Co‐Investigators:
Nick Janssen
, Graduate Student, UAF INE
Rorik Peterson
, Associate Professor, UAF INE
This work was supported by:
1) Alaska Energy Authority‐Emerging Energy Technology Fund Round 1
2) U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences, under
Evaluation of Grid‐Interactive Electric
Thermal Storage (GETS) Heaters in
Standalone Wind‐Diesel Systems
►
Goals: Use of Wind Energy
►
Space Heating & Storage
►
Grid Frequency Control
►
GETS Controller Testing
►
Steffes 2102 Ratings
►
Laboratory Test Setup
►
Results: Response to Frequency
►
Electric‐Thermal Model
►
Voltage & Frequency
Dynamics
►
Thermal Model
►
Conclusions (Take‐Aways)
Photo Credit: Steffes Corporation
►
Electrothermal Space Heating/Storage:
►
Excess Wind to Displace Oil Heating
►
Masonry Heaters (Steffes Units)
►
On/off control strategies
►
Voltage/frequency control
►
Secondary (Dump) Load
Use of Excess Wind Energy
30%
50%
20%
Fuel Use in Rural Alaska Villages
Electricity
Space Heating
Transportation
Photo Credit: Dennis Meiners, Intelligent Energy Systems
Photo Credit: Steffes Corporation
Steffes 2102 Heater Ratings
Electric Ratings
Heat Elements: 120 V; 1.33 kW
Blower: 120 V; 30‐100W
Weight
Bricks (16): 176 lbs
Heater: 105 lbs
Storage Capacity
46,062 BTU or 13.5 kWh
Heat Capacity (Bricks)
0.22 BTU/°F*lb
Temperature Rise
1100 °F
Loss of Heat through Insulation
2.4 BTU/°F*h
Heat Delivered on Demand
20,000 BTU/h
Photo Credit: Steffes Corporation
UAF Power Lab Test Setup
GETS Controller:
Programmed Frequency Response
GETS System Response:
f = 60.5 Hz
4
6
8
10
12
14
57
58
59
60
61
Time (s)
F
re
que
nc
y
(H
z)
Frequency of Voltages
Fan
Fbn
Fcn
4
6
8
10
12
14
2
4
6
8
10
Time (s)
RM
S
Cu
rre
nt
(
A
)
RMS Line Currents
IaRMS
IbRMS
IcRMS
GETS System Response:
Frequency Rise (60 to 65 Hz)
Frequency
Rise
Time to first
response (s)
0.58
Time to
appropriate
response (s)
1.51
Ramp rate
(Hz/s)
8.00
10
10.5
11
11.5
12
12.5
58
60
62
64
66
68
X: 10.03 Y: 60.5Time (s)
F
reque
nc
y
(H
z)
Frequency of Voltages
X: 9.984 Y: 60.25 X: 9.809 Y: 59.95Fan
Fbn
Fcn
10
10.5
11
11.5
12
12.5
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
X: 11.54 Y: 6.018Time (s)
RM
S
Cu
rr
en
t
RMS Line Currents
X: 10.53 Y: 1.745IaRMS
IbRMS
IcRMS
GETS System Response:
Frequency Dip (60.5 to 57 Hz)
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
56
58
60
62
X: 2.16 Y: 60Time (s)
F
req
uenc
y
(H
z)
Frequency of Voltages
Fan
Fbn
Fcn
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
0
5
10
15
X: 3.506 Y: 8.832Time (s)
RM
S
Cu
rr
en
t
RMS Line Currents
IaRMS
IbRMS
IcRMS
Frequency
Dip
Time to first
response (s)
0.49
Time to
appropriate
response (s)
1.35
Ramp rate
(Hz/s)
2.67
GETS System Response:
Zero & Full ETS Load (Cycling)
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
56
58
60
62
Time (s)
F
req
ue
nc
y
(H
z)
Frequency of Voltages
Fan
Fbn
Fcn
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
0
5
10
15
X: 4.338 Y: 9.53Time (s)
RM
S
Cu
rr
en
t
RMS Line Currents
X: 3.338 Y: 2.044 X: 13.34 Y: 9.707 X: 12.34 Y: 1.869 X: 7.332 Y: 10.29 X: 6.332 Y: 1.501 X: 10.34 Y: 9.214 X: 9.34 Y: 1.642IaRMS
IbRMS
IcRMS
GETS System Response:
¾ & Full ETS Load (Cycling)
2
4
6
8
10
12
55
60
65
70
Time (s)
F
req
uenc
y
(H
z)
Frequency of Voltages
Fan
Fbn
Fcn
2
4
6
8
10
12
2
4
6
8
10
12
X: 10.51 Y: 8.538R
M
S
C
ur
rent
RMS Line Currents
X: 9.483 Y: 9.314 X: 7.483 Y: 8.062 X: 6.505 Y: 10.02 X: 4.505 Y: 8.349 X: 3.483 Y: 10.37 X: 1.483 Y: 8.393IaRMS
IbRMS
IcRMS
GETS System Response:
Switching to Engage ETS Load
2.6
2.7
2.8
2.9
3
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
59
60
61
62
Time (s)
F
req
ue
nc
y
(H
z)
Frequency of Voltages
Fan
Fbn
Fcn
2.6
2.7
2.8
2.9
3
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
8
9
10
11
X: 2.69 Y: 9.76Time (s)
RM
S
Cu
rre
nt
RMS Line Currents
X: 2.79 Y: 9.163 X: 2.97 Y: 10.08 X: 3.07 Y: 9.496 X: 3.251 Y: 10.54 X: 3.351 Y: 9.883IaRMS
IbRMS
IcRMS
Off: ~0.1 sec
On: ~0.2 sec
GETS System Response:
Switching to Disengage ETS Load
3.2
3.4
3.6
3.8
4
4.2
58.5
59
59.5
60
60.5
61
Time (s)
F
requ
en
cy
(
H
z)
Frequency of Voltages
Fan
Fbn
Fcn
3.2
3.4
3.6
3.8
4
4.2
1
2
3
4
5
RM
S
Curre
nt
X: 3.926Y: 4.373 X: 3.608 Y: 1.574 X: 3.507 Y: 4.389 X: 3.407 Y: 1.491 X: 3.29 Y: 4.421 X: 3.19 Y: 1.368 X: 3.708 Y: 4.421 X: 3.826 Y: 1.698RMS Line Currents
IaRMS
IbRMS
IcRMS
Off: ~0.1 sec
Summary of Results:
Response of GETS Controller
ETS Load Changes:
Discrete ETS Load Levels: apply or remove based on measured frequency f
Cycled ON & OFF: @ two discrete load levels for 60 Hz f 60.5 Hz
System Frequency Changes:
Frequency Rise: add load in steps until fully loaded @ 60.5Hz
Frequency Dip: remove load in steps until fully unloaded @ 60Hz
Time Delays:
Delay Time (no ETS load to full ETS load): 1.00 s
Delay Time (¾ ETS load to full ETS load): 2.00 s
Controller Switching Times:
Small (< 1 A) ETS Loads: OFF for 0.10 s; ON for 0.20 s
Medium (≈ 3 A) ETS Loads: OFF for 0.10 s; ON for 0.10 s
Photo Credit: Steffes Corporation
ETS‐Power Systems Integration Laboratory
(PSIL) Model
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 -5 0 5 10 15x 10 4 Time (s) P ow er (W } WTG Real Power No ETS Units 5 Units/Phase 10 Units/Phase 15 Units/Phase 20 Units/Phase 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 0.96 0.98 1 1.02 1.04 Time (s) F re que nc y (p u) Bus Frequency No ETS Units 5 Units/Phase 10 Units/Phase 15 Units/Phase 20 Units/Phase 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 400 450 500 550 600 Time (s) V olt age (V ) Bus Voltage No ETS Units 5 Units/Phase 10 Units/Phase 15 Units/Phase 20 Units/Phase 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 0 10 20 30 40 Time (s) R ot or A ngle (° ) SM Rotor Angle No ETS Units 5 Units/Phase 10 Units/Phase 15 Units/Phase 20 Units/Phase
Zoom-in on next slide
(voltage stability)
75 kW
61.2 Hz
550 V with 15 units
125 kW
Multiple ETS‐PSIL Model Results
(60‐60.5 Hz; 0.1 sec hold)
8.5 9 9.5 10 10.5 11 11.5 12 12.5 -5 0 5 10 15x 10 4 Time (s) P ow er (W } WTG Real Power No ETS Units 5 Units/Phase 10 Units/Phase 15 Units/Phase 20 Units/Phase 8.5 9 9.5 10 10.5 11 11.5 12 12.5 400 450 500 550 600 V olt ag e (V ) Bus Voltage Time (s) No ETS Units 5 Units/Phase 10 Units/Phase 15 Units/Phase 20 Units/Phase 20 30 40 or An gl e (°) SM Rotor Angle No ETS Units 5 Units/Phase 10 Units/Phase 15 Units/Phase 9.4 9.6 9.8 10 10.2 10.4 10.6 10.8 11 11.2 11.4 0.99 1 1.01 1.02 1.03 F requ enc y (pu) Bus Frequency Time (s) No ETS Units 5 Units/Phase 10 Units/Phase 15 Units/Phase 20 Units/Phase
61.2 Hz
550 V with 15 units
125 kW
65.6 kW
Multiple ETS‐PSIL Model Results
(60‐60.5 Hz; 0.1 sec hold)
►
Excess Wind to Electric Heat
►
Displace oil heat & storage potential
►
Wind‐Diesel System Stability
►
GETS could assist with frequency regulation
►
Effect on voltage stability with multiple ETS loads
►
Further Investigation
►
Effect of multiple GETS units coming “ON” at same time
►
Distributed control among GETS units
►
Thermal characteristics & possible improvements?
►
On‐site manufacture of bricks?
Conclusions (Take Aways)
Questions?
Contact Info:
Richard Wies, Ph.D., P.E.
Electrical and Computer Engineering
Email: [email protected]
Phone: (907) 474‐7071
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
Rorik Peterson, Ph.D.
Mechanical Engineering
University of Alaska Fairbanks
Email: [email protected]
Phone: (907) 474‐5593
The Heat is
ON
in the Arctic!!
Steffes 2105 Heater Ratings
Electric Ratings
Heat Elements: 240 V; 6.0 kW, 7.5 kW, or 9.0 kW
Blower: 120 V; 30‐100W
Weight
Bricks (40): 440 lbs
Heater: 145 lbs
Storage Capacity
115,155 BTU or 33.75 kWh
Heat Capacity (Bricks)
0.22 BTU/°F*lb
Temperature Rise
1100 °F
Loss of Heat through Insulation
2.4 BTU/°F*h
Heat Delivered on Demand
20,000 BTU/h
Photo Credit: Steffes Corporation