• No results found

ACI 318-08, Appendix D

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "ACI 318-08, Appendix D"

Copied!
47
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

ACI 318-08, Appendix D

IBC 2006 Section 1912

Anchorage to Concrete

Mark Bartlett, PE

Field Engineer

Simpson Anchor Systems

Presentation Topics

Brief History of Anchor Design

ACI 318-08, Appendix D

Design Equations

Phi (Ф) Factors

Interaction Equation

Seismic Provisions

Reinforcement to Prevent Breakout

Other Issues

Edge Distances, Thicknesses & Spacings

When to design per App. D

IBC 2006

Adhesive Anchors and Concrete

Screws

(2)

Prior to ACI 318-02

• Cast-In-Place anchors covered by:

– PCI / ACI 349

– UBC / IBC codes listed allowable

stress capacities for CIP bolts

Prior to ACI 318-02

• Design of Post-Installed anchors:

– Individual manufacturers supplied

load values based on testing

– Values found in catalogs and

ICBO/ICC reports

– Methodology was allowable stress

and assumed an uncracked and

unreinforced section.

(3)

ACI 318-08, Appendix D

ACI 318, Appendix D

• Strength design method for

anchorage to concrete

(i.e. N

ua

≤ ΦN

n

or V

ua

≤ ΦV

n

)

– Cast-In-Place (CIP) anchors

– Post-Installed (PI) anchors

• Undercut anchors

• Torque-controlled anchors

• Deformation-controlled anchors

– PI anchors must be prequalified per

ACI 355.2

(4)

Appendix D Design Equations & Failure

Modes

• Design equations check 5

different failure modes

– Steel capacity

• Tension and Shear

– Concrete breakout capacity

• Tension and Shear

– Pullout/Pull-through capacity

• Tension only

– Concrete Pryout

• Shear only

– Concrete side-face blowout

• Tension and CIP only.

(5)

Design Equations

Tension Capacities

N

sa

= nA

se,N

f

uta

N

cb

= A

Nc

/A

Nco

ec,N

Ψ

ed,N

Ψ

c,N

Ψ

cp,N

N

b

)

N

pn

= Ψ

c,P

N

p

N

sb

= (160c

a1

√A

brg

)λ√f’

c

Shear Capacities

V

sa

= n 0.6 A

se,V

f

uta

V

cbg

= A

Vc

/A

Vco

ec,V

Ψ

ed,V

Ψ

c,V

Ψ

h,V

V

b

)

V

cpg

= k

cp

N

cbg

(6)

Steel Strength In Tension – D.5.1

N

sa

= nA

se,N

f

uta

(Eq. D-3)

– N

sa

– Nominal tensile

strength of an anchor group

– n – Number of anchors

– A

se,N

– Effective cross

sectional area of anchor in

tension

– f

uta

– Specific ultimate tensile

strength of anchor

Concrete Breakout Strength

in Tension

(7)

Concrete Breakout In Tension – D.5.2

N

cb

=A

Nc

/A

Nco

ec,N

Ψ

ed,N

Ψ

c,N

Ψ

cp,N

N

b

)

(Eq. D-5)

• N

cb

– Concrete breakout strength in

tension

Concrete Breakout In Tension – D.5.2

N

cb

=

A

Nc

/A

Nco

ec,N

Ψ

ed,N

Ψ

c,N

Ψ

cp,N

N

b

)

• A

Nc

– Projected failure area of group

• A

Nco

= 9 h

ef

2

Projected failure area of

(8)

Concrete Breakout In Tension – D.5.2

N

cb

=A

Nc

/A

Nco

(

Ψ

ec,N

Ψ

ed,N

Ψ

c,N

Ψ

cp,N

N

b

)

ƒ

Modification for eccentric load

ƒ

Ψ

ec,N

= 1/[1+(2e’

N

/3h

ef

)]

(Eq. D-9)

T

3

T

2

T

1

N

Resultant tension load

e’

N

Centroid of anchors

Concrete Breakout In Tension – D.5.2

N

cb

=A

Nc

/A

Nco

ec,N

Ψ

ed,N

Ψ

c,N

Ψ

cp,N

N

b

)

ƒ

Modification for edge effects

ƒ

If c

a,min

> 1.5h

ef

then:

Eq. D-10

Ψ

ed,N

= 1.0

ƒ

If c

< 1.5h

then:

c

a

(9)

Concrete Breakout In Tension – D.5.2

N

cb

=A

Nc

/A

Nco

ec,N

Ψ

ed,N

Ψ

c,N

Ψ

cp,N

N

b

)

ƒ

Modification for cracking

ƒ

Ψ

c,N

=1.4 for uncracked section if

k

c

= 17 in eq. (D-7)

ƒ

Ψ

c,N

per evaluation report (ER) if k

c

from ER used in eq. (D-7)

ƒ

Ψ

c,N

=1.0 for cracked section

Concrete Breakout In Tension – D.5.2

ƒ

N

cb

=A

Nc

/A

Nco

ec,N

Ψ

ed,N

Ψ

c,N

Ψ

cp,N

N

b

)

ƒ

Ψ

cp,N

– Modification for Post-Installed

anchors

ƒ

Uncracked concrete

ƒ

No supplemental reinf. to control splitting

ƒ

If c

a,min

> c

ac

then:

Ψ

cp,N

= 1.0

(Eq. D-12)

ƒ

If c

a,min

< c

ac

then:

Ψ

cp,N

= c

a,min

/c

ac

(Eq. D-13)

ƒ

Where c

ac

= 2.5 h

ef

(undercut anchors)

4 h

ef

(wedge anchors)

(10)

Concrete Breakout In Tension – D.5.2

N

cbg

=A

Nc

/A

Nco

ec,N

Ψ

ed,N

Ψ

c,N

Ψ

cp,N

N

b

)

• Basic concrete breakout strength

• N

b

=k

c

λ

√f’

c

h

ef

1.5

(Eq. D-7)

– k

c

– Coefficient for basic concrete

breakout strength

• Found in either App. D or per product ER

– λ – Modification factor for lightweight

concrete

– f’

c

– Concrete compressive strength

– h

ef

– Effective embedment depth

• Tested h

ef

found in manufacturer’s catalog or

product ER

(11)

Pullout Strength In Tension – D.5.3

N

pn

= Ψ

c,P

N

p

(Eq. D-14)

• N

pn

– Nominal pullout strength

Ψ

c,P

– Modification for cracking

– 1.0 for cracked

– 1.4 for uncracked

• N

p

– Pullout strength in

tension

Pullout Strength In Tension – D.5.3

N

pn

= Ψ

c,P

N

p

(Eq. D-14)

• N

p

– Pullout strength in tension

• For PI anchors N

p

based on ACI

355.2 test results

• For CIP anchors, N

p

based on:

– N

p

= 8 A

brg

f’

c

(Eq. D-15)

headed bolts

– N

p

= 0.9f’

c

e

h

d

a

(Eq. D-16)

hooked bolts

(12)

Side-Face Blowout Strength

in Tension

Side-Face Blowout Strength – D.5.4

N

sb

= (160c

a1

√A

brg

)λ√f’

c

(Eq. D-17)

• N

sb

– Side-face blowout strength (headed

anchors only)

• c

a1

– edge distance

• A

brg

– Net bearing area of the head of anchor

(13)

Steel Strength in Shear

Steel Strength In Shear – D.6.1

• V

sa

= n A

se,V

f

uta

(eq. D-19) CIP HSA

• V

sa

= n 0.6 A

se,V

f

uta

(eq. D-20)

– n – number of anchors

– A

se,V

– effective cross sectional

area of a single anchor in shear

– f

uta

– specified tensile strength of

(14)

Steel Strength In Shear – D.6.1

• V

sa

may also be based on the

results of tests performed and

evaluated according to ACI 355.2

Concrete Breakout Strength

in Shear

(15)

Concrete Breakout Strength In Shear –

D.6.2

V

cbg

= A

Vc

/A

Vco

ec,V

Ψ

ed,V

Ψ

c,V

Ψ

h,V

V

b

)

(Eq. D-22)

• V

cbg

– Concrete breakout strength in

shear

V

cbg

=

A

Vc

/A

Vco

ec,V

Ψ

ed,V

Ψ

c,V

Ψ

h,V

V

b

)

– A

Vc

– projected concrete failure area

of a group of anchors

A

Vc

= (1.5c

a1

+ s

1

+ c

a2

) h

a

Concrete Breakout Strength In Shear –

D.6.2

c

a2

s

1

1.5c

a1

c

a1

h

a

V

A

Vc

(16)

Concrete Breakout Strength In Shear –

D.6.2

V

cbg

= A

Vc

/

A

Vco

ec,V

Ψ

ed,V

Ψ

c,V

Ψ

h,V

V

b

)

– A

Vco

– maximum projected concrete

failure area of a single anchor

1.5c

a1

c

a1

1.5c

1

V

1.5c

a1

A

Vco

= 4.5 c

a12(Eq. D-23)

A

Vco

Concrete Breakout In Shear – D.6.2

V

cbg

= A

Vc

/A

Vco

(

Ψ

ec,V

Ψ

ed,V

Ψ

c,V

Ψ

h,V

V

b

)

ƒ

Ψ

ec,V

– Modification for eccentric

load

(Eq. D-26)

(17)

Concrete Breakout In Shear – D.6.2

V

cbg

= A

Vc

/A

Vco

ec,V

Ψ

ed,V

Ψ

c,V

Ψ

h,V

V

b

)

ƒ

Ψ

ed,V

– Modification for edge effects

ƒ

If c

a2

> 1.5c

a1

then Ψ

ed,V

= 1.0

(Eq. D-27)

ƒ

If c

a2

< 1.5c

a1

then Ψ

ed,V

= 0.7 + 0.3c

a2

/1.5c

a1

(Eq. D-28)

V

c

a1

c

a2

Concrete Breakout In Shear – D.6.2

V

cbg

= A

Vc

/A

Vco

ec,V

Ψ

ed,V

Ψ

c,V

Ψ

h,V

V

b

)

ƒ

Ψ

c,V

Modification factor for

cracking

ƒ

Ψ

c,V

= 1.4 for anchors located in a

region where analysis indicates no

cracking at service loads

(18)

Concrete Breakout In Shear – D.6.2

V

cbg

= A

Vc

/A

Vco

ec,V

Ψ

ed,V

Ψ

c,V

Ψ

h,V

V

b

)

ƒ

Ψ

c,V

= 1.0 for anchors in cracked

concrete with no supplemental

reinforcement or edge

reinforcement smaller

than a #4 bar

V

<#4

Concrete Breakout In Shear – D.6.2

V

cbg

= A

Vc

/A

Vco

ec,V

Ψ

ed,V

Ψ

c,V

Ψ

h,V

V

b

)

ƒ

Ψ

c,V

= 1.2 for anchors in cracked

concrete with reinforcement of a

#4 bar or greater between the

anchor and the edge

V

(19)

Concrete Breakout In Shear – D.6.2

V

cbg

= A

Vc

/A

Vco

ec,V

Ψ

ed,V

Ψ

c,V

Ψ

h,V

V

b

)

ƒ

Ψ

c,V

= 1.4 for anchors in cracked

concrete with reinforcement of a

#4 bar or greater between the

anchor and the edge, and with the

reinforcement enclosed

within stirrups spaced at

not more than 4”.

V

≥#4

#4@4”

Concrete Breakout In Shear – D.6.2

V

cbg

= A

Vc

/A

Vco

ec,V

Ψ

ed,V

Ψ

c,V

Ψ

h,V

V

b

)

ƒ

Ψ

h,V

– Modification factor for shear

strength of anchors located in concrete

members with h

a

< 1.5c

a1

ƒ

Ψ

h,V

= √1.5c

a1

/h

a

but not less than 1.0

ƒ

When h

a

< 1.5c

a1

, A

Vc

is reduced.

However, breakout strength is not

directly proportional to member

thickness. Ψ

h,V

adjusts for this.

c

a1

1.5c

1

V

(20)

Concrete Breakout Strength In Shear –

D.6.2

V

cbg

= A

Vc

/A

Vco

ec,V

Ψ

ed,V

Ψ

c,V

Ψ

h,V

V

b

)

• V

b

=(7(ℓ

e

/d

a

)

0.2

d

a

f’

c

(c

a1

)

1.5 (Eq. D-24)

– ℓ

e

– load bearing length of anchor

• Same as h

ef

if there is no sleeve on anchor

• Per manufacturer if there is a sleeve

– d

a

– outside diameter of anchor

– λ – adjustment for lightweight concrete

– f’

c

– concrete compressive strength

– c

a1

– edge distance

(21)

Concrete Pryout Strength In Shear –

D.6.3

V

cpg

= k

cp

N

cbg

(Eq. D-30)

k

cp

= 1.0 for h

ef

< 2.5”

k

cp

= 2.0 for h

ef

> 2.5”

N

cbg

– Nominal concrete

breakout strength in tension

– Always do tension calcs first

(22)

Phi (Φ) factors

• N

ua

≤ ΦN

n

or V

ua

≤ ΦV

n

• Phi (Ф) factors are applied to

nominal capacities before

comparing with factored forces

• Based on:

– Supplemental reinforcement

– Failure mode

– Load type

– Anchor property

Phi (Φ) factors D.4.4

0.70 0.70 CIP 0.70 0.45 Cat. 3 0.70 0.55 Cat. 2 0.70 0.65 Cat. 1 0.70 0.70 Use Condition B CIP Pullout 0.70 0.45 0.75 0.55 Cat. 3 0.70 0.55 0.75 0.65 Cat. 2 0.70 0.65 0.75 0.75 Cat. 1 0.70 0.70 0.75 0.75 CIP Breakout 0.70 0.70 0.75 0.75 CIP Side Face Blowout 0.60 0.65 Brittle 0.65 0.75 Use Condition B Ductile Steel Shear Tension Shear Tension Condition B Condition A Ф Factor Anchor Property Failure Mode

(23)

Supplemental Reinforcing D.4.4

• Condition A

– Applies where supplementary

reinforcement is present except for

pullout and pryout strengths.

• Condition B

– Applies where supplementary

reinforcement is not present, and for

pullout or pryout strength.

Supplemental Reinforcing

• Supplemental Reinforcement

– Reinforcement that acts to restrain

the potential concrete breakout but is

not designed to transfer the full

design load from the anchors into

the structural member.

– Refer to sections D.5.2.9 and

D.6.2.9 for full design load transfer

requirements

(24)

Interaction of Tension and Shear

(25)

Interaction of Tension and Shear – D.7

• If V

ua

≤0.2ΦV

n

full tension allowed

– Ignore Shear

• If N

ua

≤0.2ΦN

n

full shear allowed

– Ignore Tension

• Otherwise

N

ua

+ V

ua

< 1.2

ΦN

n

ΦV

n

(26)

Seismic Provisions

D.3.3 – When anchor design includes earthquake

forces for structures assigned to Seismic Design

Category C, D, E, or F, the additional requirements of D.3.3.1 through D.3.3.6 shall apply.

D.3.3.1 – The provisions of Appendix D do not

apply to the design of anchors in plastic hinge zones of concrete structures under earthquake forces.

D.3.3.2 – Post-installed structural anchors shall be

qualified for use in cracked concrete and shall have passed the Simulated Seismic Tests in accordance

with ACI 355.2. Pullout strength Np and steel

strength of the anchor in shear Vsashall be based on

the results of the ACI 355.2 Simulated Seismic Tests.

Seismic Provisions

D.3.3.3 – The anchor design strength associated

with concrete failure modes shall be taken as 0.75φNn and 0.75φVn, where φis given in D.4.4 or D.4.5, and

Nnand Vnare determined in accordance with D.5.2,

D.5.3, D.5.4, D.6.2, and D.6.3, assuming the concrete is cracked unless it can be demonstrated that the concrete remains uncracked.

• 0.75 reduction to concrete capacity in

Seismic Design Category C – F

• Impractical to prove concrete remains

uncracked

(27)

Seismic Provisions

D.3.3.4 – Anchors shall be designed to be

governed by the steel strength of a ductile steel elementas determined in accordance with D.5.1 and D.6.1, unless either D.3.3.5 or D.3.3.6 is satisfied.

D.3.3.5 – Instead of D.3.3.4, the attachment that

the anchor is connecting to the structure shall be designed so that the attachment will undergo ductile yielding at a force level corresponding to anchor forces no greater than the design strength of anchors

specified in D.3.3.3.

D.3.3.6 – As an alternative to D.3.3.4 and D.3.3.5,

it shall be permitted to take the design strength of the anchors as 0.4 times the design strength determined in accordance with D.3.3.3. For the anchors of stud bearing walls, it shall be permitted to take the design strength of the anchors as 0.5 times the design strength determined in accordance with D.3.3.3.

Seismic Provisions

• Summary

– Seismic Design Category C, D, E & F

– No anchors in plastic hinge

– PI anchors must pass Simulated

Seismic Test

– Design strength reduced by 25%

– Ductile steel failure of anchors shall

control, or...

– Ductile yielding of attachment, or...

– Anchor capacity reduced by 60%

(28)

Seismic Provisions

• Seismic and edge effects

– At small edge distances, concrete

breakout (non ductile failure mode)

will often control

– If attachment will not experience

ductile yielding before breakout

occurs, then 40% anchor capacity

reduction unless...

– Reinforce section to prevent

breakout from occurring

Reinforcement to Prevent Concrete

Breakout

(29)

Reinforcement to Prevent

Concrete Breakout

D.4.2.1 – The effect of reinforcement provided to

restrain the concrete breakout shall be permitted to be included in the design models used to satisfy D.4.2.

Where anchor reinforcement is provided in accor-dance with D.5.2.9 and D.6.2.9, calculation of the concrete breakout strength in accordance with D.5.2 and D.6.2 is not required.

D.5.2.9 – Where anchor reinforcement is developed

in accordance with Chapter 12 on both sides of the breakout surface, the design strength of the anchor reinforcement shall be permitted to be used instead of the concrete breakout strength in determining φNn. A

strength reduction factor of 0.75 shall be used in the design of the anchor reinforcement.

Reinforcement to Prevent

Concrete Breakout

• Refer to Commentary RD.5.2.9 for

more information

(30)

Reinforcement to Prevent

Concrete Breakout

D.6.2.9 – Where anchor reinforcement is either

developed in accordance with Chapter 12 on both sides of the breakout surface, or encloses the anchor and is developed beyond the breakout surface, the design strength of the anchor reinforcement shall be permitted to be used instead of the concrete breakout strength in determining φVn. A strength reduction factor of 0.75 shall be used in the design of the anchor reinforcement.

Plan Section

• Refer to Commentary RD.6.2.9 for more info

Reinforcement to Prevent

Concrete Breakout

Bars effec tive as anchor reinforce m ent Plan Edge Reinforcement Anchor Reinforcement Section

(31)

Reinforcement to Prevent

Concrete Breakout

• Per Commentary RD.5.2.9 and

RD.6.2.9:

– “As a practical matter, use of anchor

reinforcement is generally limited to

cast-in-place anchors.”

• What about post-installed

anchors?

– At small edge distances, anchor

capacity will be greatly reduced for

seismic design.

(32)

Capacity Adjustments

• PI anchor pullout capacity

– Tested values of N

p

are done in 2500 psi

concrete

– Pullout capacities increase for higher f’

c

– Adjustment equations in ER

• Grout pads

– 20% reduction in shear strength (D.6.1.3)

– App. D makes no mention to grout pad

thickness

• Shear load parallel to concrete edge

– Breakout capacity doubled per D.6.2.1(c).

Triple Edge Conditions

D.5.2.3 – Where anchors are located less than 1.5heffrom three or more edges, the value of hefused

in Eq. (D-4) through (D-11) shall be the greater of ca,max/1.5 and one-third of the maximum spacing

between the anchors within the group.

D.6.2.4 – Where anchors are influenced by three or

more edges, the value of ca1 used in Eq. (D-23)

through (D-29) shall be the greatest of ca2/1.5 in

either direction, ha/1.5; and one-third of the maximum

(33)

Triple Edge Condition in Tension

(34)

Corner Condition D.6.2.1(d)

(d) For anchors located at a corner, the limiting nominal concrete breakout strength shall be deter-mined for each edge, and the minimum value shall be used.

V

c

a1

c

a2

V

c

a2

c

a1

Shear Near an Edge D.6.2.1

Where anchors are located at varying distances from the edge and the anchors are welded to the attach-ment so as to distribute the force to all anchors, it shall be permitted to evaluate the strength based on the distance to the farthest row of anchors from the edge. In this case, it shall be permitted to base the value of ca1on the distance from the edge to the axis of the farthest anchor row that is selected as critical, and all of the shear shall be assumed to be carried by this critical anchor row alone.

V

c

0.5V

0.5V

Anchors

welded to

plate

Anchors

not welded

to plate

(35)

Shear Near an Edge D.6.2.1

V

c

a1

• Increase c

a1

without welding to plate

– Slot holes closest to edge

Required Edge Distances, Spacings,

and Thicknesses

(36)

Section D.8

Minimum spacings and edge distances for anchors and minimum thicknesses of members shall conform to D.8.1 through D.8.6, unless supplementary reinforce-ment is provided to control splitting. Lesser values from product-specific tests performed in accordance with ACI 355.2 shall be permitted.

D.8.1 – Unless determined in accordance with D.8.4,

minimum center-to-center spacing of anchors shall be

4dafor untorqued cast-in anchors, and 6dafor torqued cast-in anchors and post-installed anchors.

D.8.2 – Unless determined in accordance with D.8.4,

minimum edge distances for cast-in headed anchors that will not be torqued shall be based on specified cover requirements for reinforcement in 7.7. For cast-in headed anchors that will be torqued, the mcast-inimum edge distances shall be 6da.

Section D.8

D.8.3 – Unless determined in accordance with D.8.4,

minimum edge distances for post-installed anchors shall be based on the greater of specified cover requirements for reinforcement in 7.7, or minimum edge distance requirements for the products as deter-mined by tests in accordance with ACI 355.2, and shall not be less than 2.0 times the maximum aggregate size. In the absence of product-specific ACI 355.2 test information, the minimum edge distance shall be taken as not less than:

Undercut anchors...6da

Torque-controlled anchors...8da Displacement-controlled anchors...10da

(37)

Section D.8

D.8.4 – For anchors where installation does not

produce a splitting force and that will remain untorqued, if the edge distance or spacing is less than those speci-fied in D.8.1 to D.8.3, calculations shall be performed by substituting for daa smaller value d’athat meets the

requirements of D.8.1 to D.8.3. Calculated forces applied to the anchor shall be limited to the values corresponding to an anchor having a diameter of d’a.

D.8.5 – The value of heffor an expansion or undercut post-installed anchor shall not exceed the greater of 2/3 of the member thickness and the member thickness minus 4 in.

Section D.8

D.8.6 – Unless determined from tension tests in

accordance with ACI 355.2, the critical edge distance, cac, shall not be taken less than:

Undercut anchors...2.5hef

Torque-controlled anchors...4hef Displacement-controlled anchors...4hef

(38)

Limitations of Appendix D

• Applies for CIP and some

Post-Installed anchors

– Specialty inserts, through bolts,

adhesive anchors, screw anchors,

PAT fasteners outside scope of

Appendix D

– ACI Commentary: “Adhesive

anchors are widely used and can

perform adequately. At this

time…outside the scope.”

Limitations of Appendix D

• NW Concrete and LW Concrete

only

– Reductions in capacity in LW

– CMU and Concrete on metal deck

outside scope of App. D

• Grouted CMU will still use existing

post-installed anchor products

(39)

Limitations of Appendix D

• Limits to:

– Diameter (≤2”)

– Embedment depth (≤25”)

– Concrete compressive strength

(≤8000 psi PI; <10000 psi CIP).

(40)

When to use Appendix D

• Per ACI 318-08, D.2.1

– “…anchors in concrete used to

transmit structural loads by means of

tension, shear, or a combination of

tension and shear between (a)

connected structural elements; or (b)

safety-related attachments and

structural elements.”

– What is a “safety-related

attachment”?

When to use Appendix D

• Per ACI 318-08, RD.2.1

– Commentary lists examples for

safety-related attachments.

– “…safety-related attachments that are

not part of the structure (such as

sprinkler systems, heavy suspended

pipes, or barrier rails) are attached to

structural elements.”

(41)

When to Use Appendix D

IBC 2006

IBC 2006, Section 1911

Anchorage To Concrete –

Allowable Stress Design

1911.1 Scope. The provisions of this section shall govern the

allowable stress design of headed bolts, and headed stud

anchors cast in normal-weight concrete for purposes of

trans-mitting structural loads from one connected element to the

other.

These provisions do not apply to anchors installed in

hardened concrete or where load combinations include

earth-quake loads or effects.

The bearing area of headed anchors

shall be not less than one and one-half times the shank area.

Where strength design is used, or where load combinations

include earthquake loads or effects, the design strength of

anchors shall be determined in accordance with Section 1912.

Bolts shall conform to ASTM A 307 or an approved

equivalent.

(42)

IBC 2006, Section 1912

Anchorage To Concrete – Strength Design

1912.1 Scope. The provisions of this section shall govern the

strength design of anchors installed in concrete for purposes of transmitting structural loads from one connected element to the other. Headed bolts, headed studs and hooked (J- or L-) bolts cast in concrete and expansion anchors and undercut anchors installed in hardened concrete shall be designed in accordance with Appendix D of ACI 318 as modified by Section 1908.1.16, provided they are within the scope of Appendix D.

The strength design of anchors that are not within the scope of Appendix D of ACI 318, and as amended above, shall be in accordance with an approved procedure.

Exception: Where the basic concrete breakout strength in

tension of a single anchor, Nb, is determined in accordance with Equation (D-7), the concrete breakout strength requirements of Section D.4.2.2 shall be considered satisfied by the design procedures of Sections D.5.2 and D.6.2 for anchors exceeding 2 inches (51mm) in diameter or 25 inches (635mm) tensile embedment depth.

IBC 2006, Section 1908

Modifications to ACI 318

1908.1.16 ACI 318, Section D.3.3. Modify ACI 318, section

D.3.3.2 through C.3.3.5, to read as follows:

D.3.3.2 – In structures assigned to Seismic Design Category C, D, E or F,post-installed anchors for use under D.2.3 shall have passed the Simulated Seismic Tests of ACI 355.2.

D.3.3.3 – In structures assigned to Seismic Design Category C, D, E or F,the design strength of anchors shall be taken as 0.75φNnand 0.75φVn, where φ is given in D.4.4 or D.4.5, and Nnand Vnare determined in accordance with D.4.1.

D.3.3.4 – In structures assigned to Seismic Design Category C, D, E or F,anchors shall be designed to be governed by tensile or shear strength of a ductile steel element, unless D.3.3.5 is satisfied.

D.3.3.5 – Instead of D.3.3.4, the attachment that the anchor is connecting to the structure shall be designed so that the attachment will undergo ductile yielding at a load level corresponding to anchor forces no greater than the design

(43)

Adhesive Anchors and

Concrete Screws

Adhesives Anchors and Concrete

Screws

• IBC 2006, Section 1912

– “The strength design of anchors that

do not within the scope of Appendix D

of ACI 318…shall be in accordance

with an approved design procedure.”

• What design procedures are

approved?

• Who decides?

(44)

Adhesives Anchors and Concrete

Screws

• IBC 2006, Section 104.11

104.11 Alternative materials, design and methods of construction and equipment. The provisions of this code are not

intended to prevent the installation of any material or to prohibit any design or method of construction not specifically prescribed by this code, provided that any such alternative has been approved. An alternative material, design or method of construction shall be approved where the building official finds that the proposed design is satisfactory and complies with the intent of the provisions of this code, and that the material, method or work offered is, for the purpose intended, at least the equivalent of that prescribed in this code in quality, strength, effectiveness, fire resistance, durability and safety.

104.11.1 Research reports. Supporting data, where necessary

to assist in the approval of materials or assemblies not specifically provided for in this code, shall consist of valid research reports from approved sources.

Adhesives Anchors and Concrete

Screws

• IBC 2006, Section 104.11

– The building official has the ability to

approve a material if it is not

specifically referenced in the code

– Adhesive anchors and screw anchors

fall into this category

– Caution: Most building officials are still

learning about strength design

(45)

Adhesives Anchors and Concrete

Screws

• Many engineers are still designing

adhesive anchors and screw

anchors per ASD

• Strength design code reports for

adhesives and screws are just

starting to come online

Adhesives Anchors and Concrete

Screws

• ICC ES AC 193

– Expansion anchors

– Undercut anchors

– Screw anchors

• ICC ES AC 308

– Adhesive anchors

(46)

Code Reports

The Future of Anchors

• Reliance on software for anchor

design

• Many new post-installed anchors

• Confusion among engineers,

(47)

The Future of Anchors

• What changes will the IBC 2009

and ACI 318-11, Appendix D bring?

– Clearer provisions for adhesives and

concrete screws?

References

Related documents

Moreover, spectroscopy shows Cu intercalation to shift the chemical potential to higher energies and increase the LDOS at the Fermi level providing a favorable electronic

Combined scent from images and text cues resulted in higher scent ratings by participants in the first study, and participants in our second study preferred when

BA Film &amp; Theatre and German (withdrawn - all students to have completed by June 2012) BA Film &amp; Theatre and Italian (withdrawn - all students to have completed by June 2012)

Zaradi uporabe računalništva v oblaku postaja vedno bolj dostopna tudi umetna inteligenca (AI), ki se je v različne namene poslužujejo že marsikatera podjetja. AI

implementer of the Eq class would have to implement at least one of these functions; in other words, one function would be specialized (ad-hoc polymorphism), leaving the other

Comparison of magnetic resonance spectroscopy, proton density fat fraction and histological analysis in the quantification of liver steatosis in children and adolescents.. Children

Even for an initial smooth regular network, there is uniqueness in the same special class of networks, while one should ex- pect uniqueness in the natural class of curvature flows

In contrast to our results for the LGI, where the measured violations are still lower than the theoretical maximum, our maximum measured value for the quantum witness saturates