• No results found

Slab Bridge Final

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Slab Bridge Final"

Copied!
6
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Recommended for spans less than 9 m

ROHAN PERSAUD

1.0 INPUTS BRIDGE ENGINEERING

Concrete density: 25kN/m3 Width of bridge : 8.7 m

Wearing course density: 22kN/m3

Clear span : 6m

Carriageway width 7.5m Clause 112.1 of IRC:6 -minimum carrage way width Foothway with(each side): 0.6m

Slab thickness : 500mm

Wearing course thickness: 75mm

Width of bearing: 400mm

Main bar dia.: 20mm

Clear cover : 25mm ERROR: IRC:21-Cla.304.3 : Min Clear Cover 40 mm

Distribution bar dia. 12mm

Effective depth (d): 465 mm

Effective Span (l): 6.4 m

2.0 Dead loads

Self wt. of slab: 12.5 kN/m2

Self wt. of Wearing course: 1.65 kN/m2 Total: 14.15kN/m2

2.1 Max. Bending Moment: 72.448KNm. per m width of slab. 2.2 Maximum Shear force : 45.28KN. per m width of slab.

(2)

ANALYSIS OF SIMPLY SUPPORTED SLAB BRIDGES -IRC :6-2010, IRC:21-2000

3.0 Live loads

3.1 Class AA Tracked Vehicle

Table 2 of IRC:6 -for two lanes design purpose consider one lane of class AA vehicle.

Impact factor : 19.75 %

Note: The track vehicle is places symmetrical of the span.

Effective length of load: 4.75 m 45o dispersion

Effective Width of one track (be): 5.43 m

Net effective width: 6.99 m

3.1.1 Intensity of loading : 25.25KN/m2

3.1.2 Max. Bending Moment : 120.69KNm. Per m width of slab. Shear Force :

New Effective Width of one track (be): 5.13 m New Net effective width: 6.84 m New Intensity of loading : 25.79KN/m2

3.1.3 Max. Shear Force : 77.05KN Per m width of slab.

Effective width of dispersion of both tracks, providing minimum clearance of 1.2 m and allowing for overlap of dispersion.

(3)

3.2 Class AA wheeled Vehicle

Table 2 of IRC:6 -for two lanes design purpose consider one lane of class AA vehicle.

Impact factor : 25 %

Width of dispersion parallel to span: 1.23 m Effective length of load along the

span : 2.43 m

Effective width of load perpendicular

to span (be): 4.72 m

Net effective width: 6.51 m

3.2.1 Intensity of loading : 31.60KN/m2

3.2.2 Max. Bending Moment : 99.54KNm. Per m width of slab. Shear Force :

New Effective Width of one track

(be): 3.17 m

New Net effective width: 5.37 m New Intensity of loading : 38.29KN/m2

3.2.3 Max. Shear Force : 75.38KN Per m width of slab.

Dispersion areas overlap(45 degrees), and loads are placed symmetrical to the centre of span

Effective width of dispersion all wheels, providing minimum clearance of 1.2 m and allowing for overlap of dispersion.

(4)

ANALYSIS OF SIMPLY SUPPORTED SLAB BRIDGES -IRC :6-2010, IRC:21-2000

3.3 Class A wheeled Vehicle

Table 2 of IRC:6 -for two lanes design purpose consider two lane of class A vehicle.

Impact factor : 36.29 %

Width of dispersion parallel to span: 1.33 m Effective length of load along the

span : 2.530 m

Effective width of load perpendicular

to span (be): 4.922 m

Net effective width: 8.76 m

Limited effective width: 8.7 m

3.3.1 Intensity of loading : 14.12KN/m2

3.3.2 Max. Bending Moment : 45.85KNm. Per m width of slab. Shear Force :

New Effective Width of one track

(be): 6.423 m

New Net effective width: 9.51 m

Limited effective width: 8.7 m

New Intensity of loading : 5.56KN/m2

3.2.3 Max. Shear Force : 11.29KN Per m width of slab.

Design Bending Moment : 120.69 KNm Live load 72.448 KNm Dead load

193.14KNm Per m width of slab.

Design shear force : 77.05 KN live load

45.28 KN Dead load

122.33KN Per m width of slab.

Effective width of dispersion all wheels, providing minimum clearance of 1.2 m and allowing for overlap of dispersion.

Dispersion areas overlap(45 degrees), and loads are placed symmetrical to the centre of span

(5)

Design Bending Moment : 193.14KNm Per m width of slab. Design shear force : 122.33KN Per m width of slab.

1.0 INPUTS Interpulate using table :

1.5 0.46

Concrete Grade : M 25 100As/bd: 0.52 x : 0.34 N/mm2

Bar Grade : Fe 415 1.75 0.49

2.0 ALLOWABLE STRESS DESIGN :

Premissable compressive stress of concrete (Qcb): 8.33 Mpa Premissable tensile stress of rebars (Qst) : 200 Mpa

Modular ratio (m) : 10 IRC-21: cl 304

Neutral axis depth factor (n): 0.29

Lever arm factor (j): 0.90

Coefficient of Resistance (R): 1.10

2.1 Depth :

Ultimate Moment (Mu) =Rbd2

Effective depth requited (dreq) = sqr.(Mu/b.R) where b=1000 mm for slab Effective Depth required (dreq) : 418mm

Effective Depth provided (dprov) : 465mm

The Provided Depth of Slab is Sufficient 2.2 Main Tension Reinforcement :

Area of tension rebars required (Asreq )= M/(Qst.j.dprov ) Asreq = 2302mm2 per meter width of slab

Area of Tension Rerbars provided (Asprov): 2418mm 2

per meter width of slab Minimum Reinforcement (Asmin) : 600mm2 per meter width of slab Maximum Reinforcement (Asmax) : 20000mm2 per meter width of slab Asprov = 8 # bars at 150 mm c/c parallel to span

(6)

2.3 Distribution Tension Reinforcement:

Bending Moment Caused by Lateral Distribution of load (Mlat) = 0.3 Mlive + 0.2 Mdead IRC-21: cl 305-18

Mlat : 50.7KNm Per m width

Effective depth to distribution dar (d1) : 449mm Area of tension rebars required (Asreq )= Mlat/(Qst.j.d1 )

Asreq = 626mm2 per meter width of slab

Area of Tension Rerbars provided (Asprov) : 904mm2 per meter width of slab Minimum Reinforcement (Asmin) : 600mm2 per meter width of slab Maximum Reinforcement (Asmax) : 20000mm

2

per meter width of slab Asprov = 8 # bars at 150 mm c/c perpendicular to main bars

IRC:21-Cla.303.4: Spacing -150mm for crack control The Provided Area of Reinforcement is Sufficient 2.4 Strinkage and Temperature Reinforcement at top of slab :

Maximum spacing of bars : 300 mm IRC:21-Cla. 305.10

Minimum steel area : 250 mm2 per meter width of slab Asprov = 5 # bars at 250 mm c/c Both ways

The Provided Area of Reinforcement and Spacings are Sufficient

2.5 Shear Check

Maximum Shear Force : 122.33 KN

Design Shear Stress : 0.26N/mm2

Max. Permissable Shear Stress : 1.9N/mm2 Permissible Shear Stress:

(100.Asprov)/(b.d) : 0.52 By Interpulation using above table

Permissable Shear stress in concrete (Tc) : 0.34N/mm2

References

Related documents

Secara langsung Investasi Pemerintah berpengaruh negatif dalam pembentukan Pendapatan Asli Daerah yakni sebesar -0,589, sedangkan Pengaruh tidak langsung Investasi

The influence of economic capital on financial performance of LPD has a T-Statistic value is 5.853. Based on the above results can be stated the relationship of economic capital

Error rate and Updating rate led to Unitas members‘ rationality level to increase at a higher rate, almost catching up with Stima members‘ rationality level by 2015

Contradictions between the current study’s findings and those of the earlier studies are evident, such as Ole and Per (2007)’s study carried out in Uganda and

STEP L: Prepare the written detailed five-year strategic plan (mission statement, environmental or situational analyses, strategic issues, goals and strategic objectives,

To isolate, culture and characterize hair follicle stem cells and its differentiation into epidermal keratinocytes on a chitosan Skin Regeneration Template (SRT). 1.4

Our results showed that serum leptin concentrations were sig‐ nificantly higher and the values of FSH, LH, testosterone and SHBG were significantly lower in obese men as compared

refuges or ecological traps. How- ever, and as far as we know, no study has ever evaluated the possible presence and physiological condition of this species in anthropogenic