• No results found

AUDITING. Systematic process of objectively obtaining and evaluating evidence

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "AUDITING. Systematic process of objectively obtaining and evaluating evidence"

Copied!
31
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

AUDITING

l Systematic process of objectively

obtaining and evaluating evidence

» Regarding assertions about economic actions and events;

» To ascertain the degree of

correspondence between those

assertions and established criteria; and

» Communicating the results to interested

(2)

Purpose

of an Audit

To provide certain degree of

assurance that the activities

reviewed (financial statements,

operations, management practices,

etc.) have been performed in

accordance with applicable

standards or practices.

(3)

Standards on Auditing

l Either:

International Standards on Auditing, issued by IFAC (International Federation of

Accountants)

l or:

Standards for Government Auditors, issued by INTOSAI (International Organization of Supreme Audit Institutions)

(4)

AUDIT COMPLIANCE

TYPES OF AUDITS

l

Financial

l

Compliance

l

Operational

(5)

FINANCIAL AUDITS

l The Implementing Organization’s

Financial Statements

l Project Financial Statements

l Statements of Expenditures (SOEs) l Special Bank Account (SA)

(6)

Implementing Organization’s

Financial Statements

Overall objective is to express an

opinion on fairness of

statements

Phases:

l Understanding the Organization l Evaluating Internal Controls

l Testing Financial Statement

(7)

Understanding the Organization

l Nature of the Organization’s

Activities

l Organization’s Background l Significant Trends and

Relationships

l Staff Appraisal Report (SAR) l Loan Agreement

l Other Documents Pertaining to the

(8)

Evaluating Internal Controls

l

Purpose: To determine the audit tests

required for forming an opinion

l How much Reliance on internal controls? l Extent of Validation?

» Tests of Compliance

» Tests of Transactions

4

Not an endorsement of the overall

(9)

Testing the Balances

l

Purpose: To determine if

information is fairly presented

l Examples:

» Observation of Inventory-taking

» Verification of Fixed Assets

» Direct Verification with Third Parties

4

Level of Testing Might Depend on

(10)

Audit of Project Financial

Statements

l Overall Objectives

» Statements fairly presented? – For the period

– Cumulatively

l Disbursements made in accordance with:

» Loan agreement

» SAR

l Fair presentation of balance sheets,

(11)

Audit of Project F/S (cont.)

l

Similar to the audit process for the

entity’s financial statements,

except:

» Greater emphasis on inspection of valid supporting documentation

» Additional steps, such as physical observation of significant items, to

substantiate the validity of expenditures reported.

(12)

Audits of SOEs

Primary objective is to ascertain that

individual expenditures reported in

the SOEs are:

l

Fully supported by proper

documentation in files

l

Properly authorized and eligible

l

Appropriately accounted for

(13)

Audits of SOEs

...Continued l Why?

» Because withdrawal requests are not supported by documentation submitted to the Bank

l Effect?

» Results of audit are basis for

determining whether to continue use of SOEs, or if adjustment must be made on subsequent claims

(14)

Audits of Special Accounts

Primary objectives are to verify that:

l SA financial statements are fairly

presented, and

l disbursements from SAs are proper and

in accordance with the respective loan agreements

(15)

Audits of Special Accounts

(cont.)

l Auditors should:

» Review the SA records maintained by the Implementing Institution

» Review the SA bank statements

» Reconcile (including tracking of in-transit items)

» Directly confirm balances with Bank

» Examine treatment and disclosure of interest earned on SA

(16)

Audits of Adjustment Loans

l Primary focus is on the adequacy of

procedures used to prepare customs or similar certificates.

l Limited to examining certificates on

which SOEs have been based and

determining reliability of the procedures applied in verifying or issuing such

(17)

Audits of Adjustment Loans

(cont.)

l Important issues:

» TOR must satisfy financial covenants

» Documentation must not have been used to justify another adjustment loan

» Claims must be properly documented

» Negative list items must be verified

(18)

Requirements for Auditors

l Adherence to principles of integrity,

objectivity, independence and confidentially

l Adequate and Competent Staff

l Work performed by personnel who have

technical training and proficiency

l Proper direction and supervision of work

(19)

Selection of Auditors

l Preferably independent auditors who

meet ISA criteria and are members of bodies affiliated with IFAC

l Government audit institutions should

subcontract with audit firms until

equivalent independence and technical competence is achieved. The Bank can help them to meet this goal

(20)

Determining Auditor

Acceptability

l TM should consult with an accounting

professional and consider the following:

» Evidence of independence

» Qualifications and experience of key personnel

» Time and personnel reqs. of the audit

» Experience with: – Bank projects

– Operations similar to the project

» Peer review, quality control, CPE requirements of the firm

(21)

Government Auditors

l

Usually the “Supreme Audit

Institution (SAI)”

l

Should:

» Report to legislature, rather than executive branch of government

» Have statutory authority

» Preferably be a member of INTOSAI, and meet corresponding standards

Contralor General

(22)

Private Sector Auditors

l Independent auditors who meet ISA

criteria and are members of bodies affiliated with IFAC

l Duly licensed to practice the profession l Competent staff and adequate facilities l Preferably affiliated with an international

firm that provides adequate guidance and quality control

(23)

Appointing the Auditor

l The borrower appoints the auditor, but

only after the Bank has expressed the acceptability of the auditor proposed.

l The auditor should be appointed well

before the beginning of the fiscal year. Preferably there should be a multi-year contract.

(24)

Terms of Reference (TOR)

l Provide guidance for the audit and format

of the audit report

l Should not restrict the auditor’s

obligations with respect to legislation, regulation, and auditing standards

» In the event of poor performance, auditors should not be able to claim that TOR

requirements prevented them from doing professional work

(25)

Additional Guidance

l “Suggested Minimum Guidelines and Terms

of Reference for the Planning and Execution of External Audits of Borrowers, Executing Agencies and Operations Financed by the World Bank”

l FM-600 Summarizes Requirements stated in

(26)

Contract or Engagement Letter

l All engagements with audit firms should be

supported by a contract

l Contract should specifically incorporate the

TORs

l Engagement letters are prepared by

auditors and should not substitute either the TORs or the contract

l Audits by Government Auditors should at

(27)

Auditors’ Opinions

l Written upon completion of the audit of

the institution/project financial statements

» Should contain separate SOE paragraph if they are used in the project

l Types of Audit Opinions

» Unqualified

» Qualified

» Adverse

» Disclaimer of opinion

(28)

Opinions Required (Project)

l Project Financial Statements (Sources and

Applications of Funds, Accumulated

Investments, Supplementary Information)

l Certificates of Expenditures for period audited l Special Account

l Compliance

l Internal Control Structure

(29)

Management Letter

l

Is a report on the internal controls

and operating procedures of the

institution

l

Must address:

» Any subjects which the project managers and the auditor had previously agreed

should be discussed

» All other matters that the auditor judges to be worthy of management’s attention

(30)

Financing of Audit Costs

l Normally financed by Borrower if part of

its normal operating expenditures

» Exceptions must be approved by the RVP

l May be included in project budget if

costs are incremental because of project nature

l Audits performed by government

auditors should not be financed by the Bank

(31)

Report Submission

l

Audited financial statements should

be submitted within six months from

the end of implementing institution’s

fiscal year

» Or sooner if agreed upon by the Bank and the borrower

References

Related documents