KU Program:
Nursing
Higher rated programs have lower ranks.
^(NRC) indicates that the NRC obtained the data from a source other than KU.
NRC Rankings 2010
Ranking
90% Confidence
Interval
End Points
Rank as a % of
Ranked Program
Count
Best
Rank
Worst
Rank
Best
Rank
Worst
Rank
Regression-based Rankings (R)
16
36
31%
69%
Survey-based Rankings (S)
20
39
38%
75%
Research Activity Dimensional Ranking
14
37
27%
71%
Student Support & Outcomes Dimensional Ranking
4
19
8%
37%
Diversity Dimensional Ranking
47
52
90%
100%
Dimensional Ranking
Selected Variables included in
Dimensional Rankings (Source^)
Raw
Data
Rank
in
NRC
Field
Rank as
a % of
Program
Count
Research Activity
Publications per allocated faculty (NRC)
0.36
34
65%
Citations per publications (NRC)
0.83
40
77%
Percent faculty with grants (NRC)
63.4%
24
46%
Awards per allocated faculty (NRC)
0.38
7
14%
Student Support & Outcomes
Percent 1st-yr. students with full support (KU)
0.0%
35
67%
Percent completing within discipline time frame (KU)
87.0%
4
8%
Time to degree (KU)
5.70
35
67%
Diversity
Percent non-Asian minority faculty (KU)
0.0%
42
81%
Percent female faculty (KU)
95.2%
20
39%
Percent non-Asian minority students (KU)
0.0%
49
94%
Percent female students (KU)
92.9%
29
56%
Percent international students (KU)
14.3%
12
23%
Additional Variables
included in R & S Rankings
Raw
Data
Rank
in
NRC
Field
Rank as
a % of
Program
Count
Other Overall Ranking Measures
Average PhDs 2002 to 2006 (KU)
5.80
21
40%
Percent faculty interdisciplinary (KU)
16.0%
25
48%
Percent 1st-yr. students with external funding (KU)
0.0%
24
46%
KU Program:
Nursing
Regression-based Rankings
Program
ranks among
AAU publics/
Big 12
16
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
Regression-based national rank range from 5% to 95% - 52 programs ranked
0
10
20
30
40
50
Washington
Iowa
Michigan
Minnesota
Pittsburgh
Arizona
N Carolina
Wisconsin
Texas
UCLA
KUMC: Nursing
Missouri
Virginia
Ohio St
Florida
Penn St
The line represents the range where, with 90% certainty , the program's rank is located.
The larger blue dot represents the best ranking in the 90% range and the smaller black dot represents the worst ranking in the 90% range.
The X-axis represents all ranked programs; The Y -axis represents AAU Public & Big 12 ranked programs. The v ertical dashed lines ref lect quartiles of all ranked programs.
KU Program:
Nursing
Survey-based Rankings
Program
ranks among
AAU publics/
Big 12
16
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
Survey-based national rank range from 5% to 95% - 52 programs ranked
0
10
20
30
40
50
Michigan
Washington
N Carolina
Texas
Virginia
Wisconsin
Iowa
Arizona
UCLA
Pittsburgh
Minnesota
Missouri
Penn St
Ohio St
KUMC: Nursing
Florida
The line represents the range where, with 90% certainty , the program's rank is located.
The larger blue dot represents the best ranking in the 90% range and the smaller black dot represents the worst ranking in the 90% range.
The X-axis represents all ranked programs; The Y -axis represents AAU Public & Big 12 ranked programs. The v ertical dashed lines ref lect quartiles of all ranked programs.
KU Program:
Nursing
Research Rankings
Program
ranks among
AAU publics/
Big 12
16
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
Research national rank range from 5% to 95% - 52 programs ranked
0
10
20
30
40
50
Minnesota
Michigan
N Carolina
Washington
UCLA
Ohio St
Pittsburgh
Missouri
Arizona
Iowa
Wisconsin
Texas
KUMC: Nursing
Virginia
Penn St
Florida
The line represents the range where, with 90% certainty , the program's rank is located.
The larger blue dot represents the best ranking in the 90% range and the smaller black dot represents the worst ranking in the 90% range.
The X-axis represents all ranked programs; The Y -axis represents AAU Public & Big 12 ranked programs. The v ertical dashed lines ref lect quartiles of all ranked programs.
KU Program:
Nursing
Student Support Rankings
Program
ranks among
AAU publics/
Big 12
16
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
Student Support national rank range from 5% to 95% - 52 programs ranked
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Penn St
Virginia
UCLA
KUMC: Nursing
Missouri
Wisconsin
Arizona
Florida
Texas
N Carolina
Washington
Pittsburgh
Michigan
Iowa
Ohio St
Minnesota
The line represents the range where, with 90% certainty , the program's rank is located.
The larger blue dot represents the best ranking in the 90% range and the smaller black dot represents the worst ranking in the 90% range.
The X-axis represents all ranked programs; The Y -axis represents AAU Public & Big 12 ranked programs. The v ertical dashed lines ref lect quartiles of all ranked programs.
KU Program:
Nursing
Diversity Rankings
Program
ranks among
AAU publics/
Big 12
16
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
Diversity national rank range from 5% to 95% - 52 programs ranked
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
UCLA
Texas
Michigan
Virginia
N Carolina
Arizona
Washington
Florida
Pittsburgh
Ohio St
Wisconsin
Minnesota
Missouri
Penn St
Iowa
KUMC: Nursing
The line represents the range where, with 90% certainty , the program's rank is located.
The larger blue dot represents the best ranking in the 90% range and the smaller black dot represents the worst ranking in the 90% range.
The X-axis represents all ranked programs; The Y -axis represents AAU Public & Big 12 ranked programs. The v ertical dashed lines ref lect quartiles of all ranked programs.
