Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Jacumba (Appendix 2.4-1) Draft Fire Protection Plan Jacumba Solar Energy Project (Appendix 2.

42 

Loading....

Loading....

Loading....

Loading....

Loading....

Full text

(1)

2.4 Hazards and Hazardous Materials

This section discusses potential impacts relating to hazards and hazardous materials resulting from the implementation of the Proposed Project. The analysis is based on the review of existing resources, technical data, and applicable laws, regulations, and guidelines, as well as the following technical reports prepared for the Proposed Project, in conformance with the County of San Diego (County) Report Requirements or other applicable standards.

 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Jacumba (Appendix 2.4-1)

 Draft Fire Protection Plan – Jacumba Solar Energy Project (Appendix 2.4-2)

For a discussion on the Proposed Project’s impacts on public services, refer to Section 3.1.6, Public Services.

This section is divided into an analysis of potential hazards to public safety and the environment related to hazardous materials, airports, emergency response and evacuation plans, and wildland fire. The discussion of hazards and hazardous materials describes sites with known hazardous materials contamination, sites with potential hazardous materials contamination, hazardous materials transportation, hazardous materials disposal, and hazardous materials release threats. The discussion of airports examines existing airport facilities and potential operational hazards within the County, and specifically within the Proposed Project area. The discussion of emergency response and evacuation plans identifies operations and plans that exist to protect lives and property in the event of a disaster within the County. The wildland fires analysis examines fire threat hazards, the potential for wild fires in the Proposed Project area wildland– urban interface areas and project impacts on fire and emergency services response times. Additionally, information contained in the previously listed technical reports was used in the preparation of the analysis below.

Comments received in response to the Notice of Preparation (NOP) included concerns regarding potential for glare to affect gliders using the Jacumba Airport. These concerns are addressed in this section and glare is also analyzed as part of the analysis provided in Section 2.1, Aesthetics, of this EIR. A copy of the NOP and comment letters received in response to the NOP is included in Appendix 1-1 of this EIR.

Recognizing there is some public interest regarding potential health effects and hazards from exposure to electric and magnetic fields (EMFs), this section also provides information regarding these potential issues. However, this section does not consider EMFs in the context of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) for determination of environmental impact because the available evidence as evaluated by the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) and other regulatory agencies has not established that such fields pose a significant

(2)

health hazard to exposed humans and because there are no defined or adopted CEQA standards for defining health risks from EMFs. As a result, the EMF information is presented for informational purposes to the public and decision makers.

2.4.1 Existing Conditions

Regional Overview

The Proposed Project is located in a rural area with a history of agriculture, burning of refuse, and dumping, and with a high potential for wildland fire risk (CAL FIRE 2012). Other potential hazards include exposure to hazardous materials through transportation and disposal of these materials during construction of the Proposed Project, air traffic hazards from Jacumba Airport (used by gliders), and hazards associated with interference with emergency response which may occur within existing rights-of-way during construction. The conditions, as described below, pose the risk of exposure to hazardous materials or hazardous conditions on the site, or to/from adjacent sites.

Hazardous Materials

Hazardous materials may be encountered during construction activities. Hazardous materials typically require special handling, reuse, and disposal because of their potential to harm human health and the environment. The California Health and Safety Code, Section 25501, defines a hazardous material as:

Any material that, because of its quantity, concentration, or physical or chemical characteristics, poses a significant present or potential hazard to human health and safety or to the environment if released into the workplace or the environment. “Hazardous materials” include, but are not limited to, hazardous substances, hazardous waste, and any material that a handler or the administering agency has a reasonable basis for believing that it would be injurious to the health and safety of persons or harmful to the environment if released into the workplace or the environment.

Potential Hazardous Materials Associated with Historical Land Uses

A variety of historical land uses and conditions in the Proposed Project area or nearby sites could potentially result in site contamination, representing potential hazards to humans and the environment when new land uses are proposed on those lands. Examples of historical land uses in rural areas that have the potential to result in current site contamination include:

Burn Dump Sites – Burn ash refers to the debris, refuse, ash, and ash-contaminated soil that result from the open burning of municipal solid waste. Burn dump sites refer to

(3)

locations where the open burning of solid waste occurred. Burn ash can be commingled with other solid wastes, including incompletely burned refuse. Burn ash may contain concentrations of heavy metals, such as lead, that may be a potential risk to human health and, if excavated, may need to be disposed as either a California or Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) hazardous waste.

Landfills – Active, abandoned, and closed landfills present potential issues related to the exposure of humans to hazards, such as landfill gas migration, when a project is proposed on or near a landfill site.

Historical Agriculture Agricultural activities include the application of fertilizers, herbicides, and pesticides that have the potential to contaminate soil and groundwater. Soils contaminated by past agricultural activities are a growing concern, generally because of land use changes involving proposed housing developments on former agricultural lands.

Petroleum – Petroleum hydrocarbons are the most commonly used group of chemicals in society today. Petroleum hydrocarbons encompass a wide range of compounds, including but not limited to fuels, oils, paints, dry cleaning solvents, and non-chlorinated solvents. These compounds are used in all facets of modern life and can cause soil and groundwater contamination if not properly handled. Underground storage tanks (USTs) and aboveground storage tanks (ASTs) that store petroleum are common sources of contamination into soils and groundwater in the County (County of San Diego 2011a). As part of the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment prepared for the Proposed Project (Appendix 2.4-1), a history of the site was compiled based on the review of historical aerial photographs and topographic maps, agency records, County Directory listings, building permit reports, and a site owner/representative interview. The research revealed that the site has not been previously developed or used and has remained in similar condition as it exists in today. The gen-tie route is less than half a mile in length and crosses a portion of one Assessor’s Parcel Number. The gen-tie route site consists of undisturbed land and crossing the East County (ECO) Substation driveway. No portion of the gen-tie route includes a groundwater well, septic system, chemical or petroleum storage, or an impacted fuel spill site.

The Phase I Environmental Site Assessment identified no recognized environmental conditions or potential sources of hazardous materials or contamination on the Project properties.

Hazardous Waste Transportation

In California, unless specifically exempted, it is unlawful for any person to transport hazardous wastes unless the person holds a valid registration issued by the Department of Toxic Substances

(4)

Control. The Department of Toxic Substances Control maintains a list of active registered hazardous waste transporters throughout the state. The process of transporting hazardous waste often involves transfer facilities. A transfer facility is any facility that is not an on-site facility that is related to the transportation of waste. These facilities include but are not limited to, loading docks, parking areas, storage areas, and other similar areas. Although not all transfer facilities hold hazardous waste, any operator of a facility that accepts hazardous waste for storage, repackaging, or bulking must obtain formal authorization for those activities through the hazardous waste permit process. Hazardous waste transporters are exempt from storage facility permit requirements so long as they observe the limits on storage time and handling.

Hazardous Materials Disposal

Through the RCRA, Congress directed the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to create regulations that manage hazardous waste from “the cradle to the grave.” Under this mandate, the EPA has developed strict requirements for all aspects of hazardous waste management, including the recycling, treatment, storage, and disposal of hazardous waste. Facilities that provide recycling, treatment, storage, and disposal of hazardous waste are referred to as treatment, storage, and disposal facilities. Regulations pertaining to these facilities are designed to prevent the release of hazardous materials into the environment and are more stringent than those that apply to generators or transporters. Within the unincorporated County, multiple treatment, storage, and disposal facility sites exist, such as those owned and operated by the U.S. military and San Diego Gas & Electric (SDG&E).

Airport Hazards

Airport Land Use Compatibility Plans (ALUCPs) are plans that guide property owners and local jurisdictions in determining what types of proposed new land uses are appropriate around airports. Airport safety zones are established for all public airports as part of the ALUCP, and land use restrictions within safety zones are established to protect people and property on the ground and in the air. Main areas of concern related to airport hazards include overflight safety, airspace protection, flight patterns, and land use compatibility. Hazards associated with airports can have serious human safety and quality of life impacts. Aviation facilities provide a variety of aviation services to local residents, including civil aviation, government use, business flights, charter flights, flight schools, and helicopter operations.

The nearest registered airport is the Jacumba Airport located approximately 1.5 miles west of the Project site. The Project site is within Airport Influence Area 2 of the Jacumba Airport (AIA). The airport is unattended and unlighted and is mainly used as a glider facility by single-engine aircraft and sailplanes, with activity predominately occurring during weekends in non-summer

(5)

months. In 2011, 800 operations occurred at the Jacumba Airport. No aircraft are based at the Jacumba Airport (County of San Diego 2012a).

There are no active private airstrips within the vicinity of the Project site. Wildfire Hazards

A vast amount of the County’s undeveloped lands support natural habitats such as grasslands, sage scrub, chaparral, and some coniferous forest. In the context of fire ecology, these areas are known as wildlands. Fire ecology research has shown that the natural fire regime for the shrublands and forests in the County was one of frequent small fires and occasional large fires. Modern society has interrupted and fractured the natural fire process by initiating fire suppression policies, introducing invasive plant species that burn readily such as eucalyptus trees, and building houses within or adjacent to wildland areas (wildland–urban interface areas) such as the County’s backcountry. Although fires can occur anywhere in the County, fires that begin in wildland areas pose a threat to personal safety and structures due to rapid spread and the extreme heat that these fires often generate. Past wildfires have taken lives and destroyed homes. The Proposed Project is located in an area classified as Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE) (Appendix 2.4-2). Fire hazard designations are based on topography, vegetation, and weather, amongst other factors that indicate the likelihood of wildfire occurrence. The Proposed Project site is located in an area dominated by semi-desert chaparral vegetation, which is a vegetation community that experiences occasional wildfire and can burn in an extreme manner under windy, dry conditions. The terrain on and within the vicinity of the Proposed Project site is predominantly flat to gently rolling. The Proposed Project area, like all of inland San Diego County, is subject to seasonal weather conditions that can heighten the likelihood of fire ignition and spread. Santa Ana winds are winds originating from the Great Basin that create extreme fire weather conditions characterized by low humidity, sustained high speeds, and extremely strong gusts. These conditions can lead to extremely intense and fast-moving fires.

The County has a long history of wildland fires. As identified in an annual report produced by CAL FIRE called “Wildfire Activity Statistics,” the County is consistently listed among the top five counties in the state for both number of acres burned and dollar value of fire damage. In the County, fire season is typically defined from May through November, depending on variations in weather conditions. However, the threat of a wildland fire is always present and is influenced by weather conditions throughout the year. In 2011, 196 fires in San Diego County burned a combined 17,439 acres, the largest amount of acres burned per County in California in 2011 (CAL FIRE 2012).

(6)

The fire environment in southeastern San Diego County is considered one of several areas that are classified as “wildfire corridors.” The wildfire corridor includes a consistent and continuous fuel bed that extends from extreme east County to the urban areas of Alpine, El Cajon, and Chula Vista to the west. Although the area is subject to occasional wildfire ignitions, a large portion of the fuel bed has not burned in 40 or more years. This situation is considered to result in the potential for catastrophic wildfire under extreme weather conditions (Appendix 2.4-2).

Based on the region’s fuels, fire history, and expected fire behavior, a high-intensity fire can be expected to occur in the Proposed Project area at some point in the future, whether it is started by natural or man-made causes. Fire behavior in the Proposed Project area can be extreme with intense heat, above average flame lengths, fast spread, and spotting, thus causing a hazard both on and off the Proposed Project site. For information on fire protection services in the Proposed Project area, see Section 3.1.6, Public Services.

Hazards Associated with Interference with Emergency Responses

County of San Diego Department of Environmental Health, Hazardous Incident Response Team

The County of San Diego Department of Environmental Health, Hazardous Incident Response Team (DEH-HIRT) is the local agency that is responsible for responding to chemically related emergencies or complaints. DEH-HIRT consists of 10 California State Certified Hazardous Materials Specialists. The team was founded in 1981 by the Unified Disaster Council and is funded by a Joint Powers Agreement. This team services all unincorporated San Diego County areas, 18 municipalities, 2 military bases, and 5 Indian reservations. There are over 400 responses a year in the DEH-HIRT operational area. DEH-HIRT responds jointly with the San Diego Fire-Rescue Department Hazardous Incident Response Team to investigate and mitigate chemically related emergencies or complaints. Emergency response activities include mitigation, containment, control actions, hazard identification, and threat evaluation to the local population and the environment. DEH-HIRT is also responsible for handling all after normal business hours complaints for the DEH (County of San Diego 2012b).

Emergency/Evacuation Plans

Emergency response plans include elements to maintain continuity of government, emergency functions of governmental agencies, mobilization and application of resources, mutual aid, and public information. Emergency response plans are maintained at the federal, state, and local level for all types of disasters, including human-made and natural. Local governments have the primary responsibility for preparedness and response activities. In San Diego County, there is a comprehensive emergency plan known as the Operational Area Emergency Plan as well as numerous stand-alone emergency plans, including the Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation

(7)

Plan. Potential hazards or events that may trigger an emergency response action in the County include earthquakes, tsunamis, floods, wildland fires, landslides, droughts, hurricanes, tropical storms and freezes. Emergency response actions could also be triggered from a hazardous material incident, water or air pollution, a major transportation accident, water, gas, or energy shortage, an epidemic, a nuclear accident, or terrorism.

Wildfire Hazards

As discussed above, the Proposed Project site is located within an area classified as Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone by CAL FIRE (Appendix 2.4-2). Vegetation on the site and adjacent sites is dominated by chaparral species, which represent fuels that would spread wildfire on and off the site. Based on the region’s fuels, fire history, and expected fire behavior, a high-intensity fire can be expected to occur in the area that would be considered a hazard to the site and surrounding properties (Dudek 2013).

Hazards Associated with Interference with Emergency Responses

The site is undeveloped and presents no interference with implementation of emergency responses in the area. The approximate response time to the Proposed Project facilities from the Jacumba Fire Station is 9 minutes. This response time is compliant with the General Plan travel time requirements for rural land use zoning, which allow in excess of 20 minutes (see Appendix 2.4-2). Emergency medical response cannot be separated from fire protection response services because the first responders to emergency medical responses are usually fire response units. American Medical Response (AMR) San Diego is the contracted ambulance service provider for the Proposed Project area. AMR’s closest location within the Proposed Project area is at 1390 Dewey Place in Campo (ARM San Diego 2012). Due to AMR’s very large service area, when an AMR unit responds to a call it can be unavailable for additional calls for extended time periods. In addition to AMR, primary medical response is provided by area fire stations (Dudek 2013). For more information on fire protection in the Proposed Project area and applicable fire protection laws and regulations, see Appendix 2.4-2, Draft Fire Protection Plan – Jacumba Solar Energy Project.

2.4.2 Regulatory Setting

Numerous federal, state, and local regulations have been enacted to prevent or mitigate damage to public health and safety and the environment from the release or threatened release of hazardous substances into the workplace or environment, to protect human health and environmental resources from existing site contamination, and to protect human health and safety from the threat of an emergency, including fire. The regulations below are relevant to the

(8)

Proposed Project and the topics of hazardous substances, site contamination, and potential emergencies on the site.

Federal Regulations

Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976, as amended by the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments of 1984

Federal hazardous waste laws are generally promulgated under RCRA. RCRA establishes a framework for national programs to achieve environmentally sound management of both hazardous and non-hazardous wastes. RCRA was designed to protect human health and the environment, reduce/eliminate the generation of hazardous waste, and conserve energy and natural resources. RCRA also promotes resource recovery techniques. The Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments of 1984 both expanded the scope of RCRA and increased the level of detail in many of its provisions. The Hazardous Waste Management subchapter of the RCRA deals with a variety of issues regarding the management of hazardous materials including the export of hazardous waste, state programs, inspections of hazardous waste disposal facilities, enforcement, and the identification and listing of hazardous waste.

Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act and the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986

Congress enacted the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), commonly known as Superfund, on December 11, 1980. CERCLA established prohibitions and requirements concerning closed and abandoned hazardous waste sites, provided for liability of persons responsible for releases of hazardous waste at these sites, and established a trust fund to provide for cleanup when no responsible party could be identified. The Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act (SARA) amended CERCLA on October 17, 1986. SARA stressed the importance of permanent remedies and innovative treatment technologies in cleaning up hazardous waste sites, required Superfund actions to consider the standards and requirements found in other state and federal environmental laws and regulations; provided new enforcement authorities and settlement tools, increased state involvement in every phase of the Superfund program, increased the focus on human health problems posed by hazardous waste sites, encouraged greater citizen participation in making decisions on how sites should be cleaned up, and increased the size of the trust fund to $8.5 billion.

Chemical Accident Prevention Provisions

When Congress passed the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, it required the EPA to publish regulations and guidance for chemical accident prevention at facilities using extremely hazardous substances. These rules, which built upon existing industry codes and standards,

(9)

require companies of all sizes that use certain flammable and toxic substances to develop a Risk Management Program.

Emergency Planning Community Right-to-Know Act

The Emergency Planning Community Right-to-Know Act, also known as SARA Title III, was enacted in October 1986. The act was passed in response to concerns regarding the environmental and safety hazards posed by the storage and handling of toxic chemicals. These concerns were triggered by the disaster in Bhopal, India, in which more than 2,000 people suffered death or serious injury from the accidental release of methyl isocyanate. To reduce the likelihood of such a disaster in the United States, Congress imposed requirements on both state and federally regulated facilities. SARA Title III establishes requirements for federal, state, and local governments, Indian Tribes, and industry regarding emergency planning and “Community Right-to-Know” reporting on hazardous and toxic chemicals. The act requires states and local emergency planning groups to develop community emergency response plans for protection from a list of Extremely Hazardous Substances (40 CFR 355, Appendix A). The community right-to-know provisions help increase the public’s knowledge and access to information on chemicals at individual facilities, their uses, and releases into the environment. In California, SARA Title III is implemented through the California Accidental Release Prevention (CalARP) program.

Hazardous Materials Transportation Act

The U.S. Department of Transportation regulates hazardous materials transportation under Title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). State agencies with primary responsibility for enforcing federal and state regulations and responding to hazardous materials transportation emergencies are the California Highway Patrol and the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). These agencies also govern permitting for hazardous materials transportation.

EPA Region 9, Preliminary Remediation Goals

Region 9 is the Pacific Southwest Division of the EPA, which includes Arizona, California, Hawaii, Nevada, the Pacific Islands, and over 140 Tribal Nations. Preliminary Remediation Goals are tools for evaluating and cleaning up contaminated sites. Preliminary Remediation Goals for the Superfund/RCRA programs are risk-based concentrations, derived from standardized equations combining exposure information assumptions with EPA toxicity data. They are considered to be protective for humans (including sensitive groups) over a lifetime. However, Preliminary Remediation Goals are not always applicable to a particular site and do not address non-human-health issues, such as ecological impacts. Region 9’s Preliminary Remediation Goals are viewed as agency guidelines, not legally enforceable standards.

(10)

Federal Aviation Administration Functions

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has primary responsibility for the safety of civil aviation. The FAA’s major functions regarding hazards include the following: (1) developing and operating a common system of air traffic control and navigation for both civil and military aircraft, (2) developing and implementing programs to control aircraft noise and other environmental effects of civil aviation, (3) regulating U.S. commercial space transportation, and (4) conducting reviews to determine that the safety of persons and property on the ground are protected.

An FAA report titled Technical Guidance for Evaluating Selected Solar Technologies on Airports (FAA Solar Guide) was prepared to provide the FAA with procedures for reviewing solar projects (FAA 2010). The FAA Solar Guide includes the following content:

 Chapter 1 provides an introduction to solar electricity and how it is delivered to customers. It includes a description of solar photovoltaic (PV) technology, which is one of the more practical applications for airports, other types of solar energy systems, how systems connect and operate with the electric grid, and the specific electricity supply and demand issues associated with solar projects at airports.

 Chapter 2 reviews airport site planning issues including the life cycle of a typical solar PV project, project participants, and airport planning considerations for locating solar facilities at airports (e.g., Airport Layout Plan consistency).

 Chapter 3 examines the regulatory issues that FAA must consider, including Title 14 of the CFR Part 77 (Airspace Review) and obligations under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA).

 Chapter 4 describes the financial landscape for solar projects including the government incentives available to fund projects and how the different ownership models (e.g., public versus private) can maximize project cost-effectiveness.

 Chapter 5 reviews the federal government’s role in solar development and includes recommendations for future research and procedural efficiency.

As of June 26, 2012, the FAA is reviewing Section 3.1.2, Reflectivity, of the FAA Solar Guide, based on new information and field experience. The FAA cautions users against relying solely on this section at this time as it may be subject to change (FAA 2010). The FAA provided an Interim Policy on October 23, 2013, regarding review of solar energy system projects on federally obligated airports; however, it does not address off-airport facilities.

(11)

Federal Response Plan

The Federal Response Plan of 1999 is a signed agreement among 27 federal departments and agencies, including the American Red Cross, that (1) provides the mechanism for coordinating delivery of federal assistance and resources to augment efforts of state and local governments overwhelmed by a major disaster or emergency; (2) supports implementation of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Act, as well as individual agency statutory authorities; and (3) supplements other federal emergency operations plans developed to address specific hazards. The Federal Response Plan is implemented in anticipation of a significant event likely to result in a need for federal assistance or in response to an actual event requiring federal assistance under a presidential declaration of a major disaster or emergency.

State Regulations Hazardous Materials

California Government Code Section 65962.5 (a), Cortese List

The Hazardous Waste and Substance Sites (Cortese) List is a planning document used by the state, local agencies, and developers to comply with the CEQA requirements in providing information about the location of hazardous materials release sites. Government Code Section 65962.5 requires the California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA) to develop at least annually an updated Cortese List. The Department of Toxic Substances Control is responsible for a portion of the information contained in the Cortese List. Other state and local government agencies are required to provide additional hazardous material release information for the Cortese List.

Hazardous Materials Business Plans

Article 1 of Chapter 6.95 of the California Health and Safety Code (Sections 25500–25520) requires that any business that handles, stores, or disposes of a hazardous substance at a given threshold quantity must prepare a hazardous materials business plan (HMBP). HMBPs are intended to minimize hazards to human health and the environment from fires, explosions, or an unplanned release of hazardous substances into air, soil, or surface water. The HMBP must be carried out immediately whenever a fire, explosion, or unplanned chemical release occurs. An HMBP includes three sections: (1) an inventory of hazardous materials, including a site map, which details their location; (2) an emergency response plan; and (3) an employee-training program. HMBPs serve as an aid to employers and employees in managing emergencies at a given facility. They also help better prepare emergency response personnel for handling a wide range of emergencies that might occur at the facility.

(12)

HMBPs are submitted to the Department of Environmental Health Hazardous Materials Division. The plans must be resubmitted, reviewed, revised, or amended as necessary every 3 years. The HMBP must also be amended within 30 days whenever there are changes in the amount or location of stored hazardous chemicals on a site. The Hazardous Materials Division conducts routine inspections at businesses required to submit business plans. The purpose of these inspections is to (1) ensure compliance with existing laws and regulations concerning HMBP requirements, (2) identify existing safety hazards that could cause or contribute to an accidental spill or release, and (3) suggest preventative measures designed to minimize the risk of a spill or release of hazardous materials. After initial submission of an HMBP, the business must review and recertify the HMBP every year.

Risk Management Plans

Article 2 of Chapter 6.95 of the California Health and Safety Code (Sections 25531–25543.3) requires the owner or operator of a stationary source (non-transporation) with more than a threshold quantity of a regulated substance to prepare a risk management plan. The state statutes and regulations combine federal and state program requirements for the prevention of accidental releases of listed substances into the atmosphere. The incorporation of the federal and state requirements have been designated the CalARP program. CalARP requires that a risk management plan include a hazard assessment program, an accidental release prevention program, and an emergency response plan. The risk management plan must be revised every 5 years or as necessary. The majority of facilities or businesses in the County that have prepared risk management plans are ammonia refrigeration facilities, water treatment and wastewater treatment plants that handle chlorine gas and facilities that store flammable chemicals such as methane and propane.

Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations and Hazardous Waste Control Law, Chapter 6.5

The Department of Toxic Substances Control regulates the generation, transportation, treatment, storage, and disposal of hazardous waste under RCRA and the California Hazardous Waste Control Law. Both laws impose “cradle-to-grave” regulatory systems for handling hazardous waste in a manner that protects human health and the environment. CalEPA has delegated some of its authority under the Hazardous Waste Control Law to county health departments and other Certified Unified Program Agencies, including the San Diego County DEH.

Title 23 of the California Code of Regulations, Underground Storage Tank Act

The underground storage tank monitoring and response program is required under Chapter 6.7 of the California Health and Safety Code and Title 23 of the California Code of Regulations. The program was developed to ensure that the facilities meet regulatory requirements for design,

(13)

monitoring, maintenance, and emergency response in operating or owning underground storage tanks. The County DEH is the local administering agency for this program.

Title 27 of the California Code of Regulations, Solid Waste

Title 27 of the California Code of Regulations contains a waste classification system that applies to solid wastes that cannot be discharged directly or indirectly to waters of the state and which therefore must be discharged to waste management sites for treatment, storage, or disposal. The California Integrated Waste Management Board and its certified Local Enforcement Agency regulate the operation, inspection, permitting, and oversight of maintenance activities at active and closed solid waste management sites and operations.

California Human Health Screening Levels

The California Human Health Screening Levels (CHHSLs or “Chisels”) are concentrations of 54 hazardous chemicals in soil or soil gas that CalEPA considers to be below thresholds of concern for risks to human health. The CHHSLs were developed by the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment on behalf of CalEPA. The CHHSLs were developed using standard exposure assumptions and chemical toxicity values published by the EPA and CalEPA. The CHHSLs can be used to screen sites for potential human health concerns where releases of hazardous chemicals to soils have occurred. Under most circumstances, the presence of a chemical in soil, soil gas, or indoor air at concentrations below the corresponding CHHSL can be assumed to not pose a significant health risk to people who may live or work at the site. There are separate CHHSLs for residential and commercial/industrial sites.

Senate Bill 1889, Accidental Release Prevention Law/CalARP

Senate Bill (SB) 1889 required California to implement a new federally mandated program governing the accidental airborne release of chemicals promulgated under Section 112 of the Clean Air Act. Effective January 1, 1997, CalARP replaced the previous California Risk Management and Prevention Program and incorporated the mandatory federal requirements. CalARP addresses facilities that contain specified hazardous materials, known as “regulated substances,” which if involved in an accidental release could result in adverse off-site consequences. CalARP defines regulated substances as chemicals that pose a threat to public health and safety or the environment because they are highly toxic, flammable, or explosive. Emergency Response to Hazardous Materials Incidents

California has developed an emergency response plan to coordinate emergency services provided by federal, state, and local government, and private agencies. The plan is administered by the California Emergency Management Agency and includes response to hazardous materials

(14)

incidents. The California Emergency Management Agency coordinates the response of other agencies, including CalEPA, California Highway Patrol, California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Regional Water Quality Control Board, San Diego Air Pollution Control District, the City of San Diego Fire Department, and DEH-HIRT.

California Fire Code

The California Fire Code (CFC) is Chapter 9 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations. It was created by the California Building Standards Commission and is based on the International Fire Code created by the International Code Council. It is the primary means for authorizing and enforcing procedures and mechanisms to ensure the safe handling and storage of any substance that may pose a threat to public health and safety. The CFC regulates the use, handling, and storage requirements for hazardous materials at fixed facilities. The CFC and the California Building Code use a hazard classification system to determine what protective measures are required to protect fire and life safety. These measures may include construction standards, separations from property lines, and specialized equipment. To ensure that these safety measures are met, the CFC employs a permit system based on hazard classification. The CFC is updated every 3 years.

Emergency Response

California Emergency Services Act

The California Emergency Services Act was adopted to establish the state’s roles and responsibilities during human-made or natural emergencies that result in conditions of disaster and/or extreme peril to life, property, or the resources of the state. This act is intended to protect health and safety by preserving the lives and property of the people of the state.

California Natural Disaster Assistance Act

The California Natural Disaster Assistance Act provides financial aid to local agencies to assist in the permanent restoration of public real property, other than facilities used solely for recreational purposes, when such real property has been damaged or destroyed by a natural disaster. The California Natural Disaster Assistance Act is activated after the following occurs: (1) a local declaration of emergency; or (2) California Emergency Management Agency gives concurrence with the local declaration, or the governor issues a proclamation of a state emergency. Once the act is activated, local government is eligible for certain types of assistance, depending upon the specific declaration or proclamation issued.

(15)

Wildfire Protection

Title 14 Division 1.5 of the California Code of Regulations

Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, Division 1.5, establishes the regulations for CAL FIRE and is applicable in all State Responsibility Areas—areas where CAL FIRE is responsible for wildfire protection. Most of the unincorporated area of the County is a State Responsibility Area, and any development in State Responsibility Areas must comply with these regulations. Among other things, Title 14, Section 1270 et seq. establishes minimum standards for emergency access, fuel modification, setback to property line, signage, and water supply.

State Fire Regulations

State fire regulations are set forth in Section 13000 et seq. of the California Health and Safety Code, which include regulations concerning building standards (as also set forth in the California Building Code), fire protection and notification systems, fire protection devices such as extinguishers and smoke alarms, high-rise building and childcare facility standards, and fire suppression training. The state fire marshal enforces these regulations and building standards in all state-owned buildings, state-occupied buildings, and state institutions throughout California. Local Regulations

San Diego County, Site Assessment and Mitigation Program

The County DEH maintains the Site Assessment and Mitigation list of contaminated sites that have previously or are currently undergoing environmental investigations and/or remedial actions. The County Site Assessment and Mitigation Program, within the Land and Water Quality Division of the DEH, has a primary purpose to protect human health, water resources, and the environment within the County by providing oversight of assessments and cleanups in accordance with the California Health and Safety Code and California Code of Regulations. The Site Assessment and Mitigation’s Voluntary Assistance Program also provides staff consultation, project oversight, and technical or environmental report evaluation and concurrence (when appropriate) on projects, including properties contaminated with hazardous substances.

Jacumba Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan

The County of San Diego adopted the ALUCP for the Jacumba Airport in December 2006 and amended the plan in 2011 (County of San Diego 2011b). ALUCPs are plans that guide property owners and local jurisdictions in determining what types of proposed new land uses are appropriate around airports. They are intended to protect the safety of people, property, and aircraft on the ground and in the air in the vicinity of the airport. They also protect airports from

(16)

encroachment by new incompatible land uses that could restrict their operations. The Jacumba ALUCP defines an area around the airport as the AIA, which is established by factors including airport size, operations, and configuration, as well as the safety, airspace protection, noise, and overflight impacts on the land surrounding an airport. The Proposed Project is located within the AIA for Jacumba Airport, Airport Influence Area 2. Therefore, the Proposed Project is subject to the restrictions applicable to the AIA.

County of San Diego Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan

The County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan is implemented by the County of San Diego Office of Emergency Services. The Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan is a County-wide plan that identifies risks posed by natural and man-made disasters and discusses ways to minimize potential damage occurring as a result of these disasters. The comprehensive plan is intended to serve many purposes, including enhancing public understanding and awareness of potential hazardous situations, creating a decision tool for managing hazards, promoting compliance with state and federal program requirements, enhancing local policies for hazard mitigation capability, providing inter-jurisdictional coordination, and achieving regulatory compliance (County of San Diego 2010a).

Operational Area Emergency Plan

The Office of Emergency Services also implements the Operational Area Emergency Plan. The Operational Area Emergency Plan describes a comprehensive emergency management system which provides for a planned response to disaster situations associated with natural disasters, technological incidents, terrorism, and nuclear-related incidents. It delineates concepts relating to various emergency situations, identifies components of a comprehensive emergency management system and describes the overall responsibilities for protecting life and property and assuming the overall well-being of the population. The plan contains 17 annexes detailing specific emergency operations for different emergency situations; in addition there are 7 stand-alone emergency plans (County of San Diego 2010b).

County of San Diego Code of Regulatory Ordinances Sections 68.401-68.406, Defensible Space for Fire Protection Ordinance

This ordinance addresses the accumulation of weeds, rubbish, and other materials on a private property found to create a fire hazard and be injurious to the health, safety, and general welfare of the public. The ordinance constitutes the presence of such weeds, rubbish, and other materials as a public nuisance, which must be abated in accordance with the provisions of this section. This ordinance is enforced in all County Service Areas, and in the unincorporated areas of the County outside of a fire protection district. All fire protection districts have a combustible

(17)

vegetation abatement program, and many fire protection districts have adopted and enforce the County’s ordinance.

County of San Diego Code of Regulatory Ordinances Sections 96.1.005 and 96.1.202, Removal of Fire Hazards

The San Diego County Fire Authority (SDCFA), in partnership with CAL FIRE, the Bureau of Land Management, and the U.S. Forest Service, is responsible for the enforcement of defensible space inspections. Inspectors from CAL FIRE are responsible for the initial inspection of properties to ensure an adequate defensible space has been created around structures. If violations of the program requirements are noted, inspectors provide a list of required corrective measures and provide a reasonable time frame to complete the task. If the violations still exist upon reinspection, the local fire inspector will forward a complaint to the County for further enforcement action.

County of San Diego Consolidated Fire Code

The County of San Diego, in collaboration with the local fire protection districts, created the first Consolidated Fire Code in 2001. The Consolidated Fire Code contains the County and fire protection districts’ amendments to the California Fire Code. The purpose of consolidation of the County and local fire districts adoptive ordinances is to promote consistency in the interpretation and enforcement of the fire code for the protection of the public health and safety, which includes permit requirements for the installation, alteration, or repair of new and existing fire protection systems, and penalties for violations of the code. The Code provides the minimum requirements for access, water supply and distribution, construction type, fire protection systems, and vegetation management. Additionally, the fire code regulates hazardous materials and associated measures to ensure that public health and safety are protected from incidents relating to hazardous substance releases. San Diego County’s 2014 Consolidated Fire Code is the most recently adopted version and it contains the County and fire protection districts’ amendments to the 2013 California Fire Code.

County of San Diego General Plan

Updated (and adopted) in August 2011, the County of San Diego General Plan guides future growth in the unincorporated areas of the County and considers projected growth anticipated to occur within various communities. Policies relevant to emergencies, hazards, and hazardous materials that may occur at the Proposed Project site are listed below.

Land Use Element

Policy LU-6.10: Protection from Hazards. Require that development be located and designed to protect property and residents from the risks of natural and man-induced hazards.

(18)

Safety

Policy S-3.1: Defensible Development. Require development to be located, designed, and constructed to provide adequate defensibility and minimize the risk of structural loss and life safety resulting from wildland fires.

Policy S-3.3: Minimize Flammable Vegetation. Site and design development to minimize the likelihood of a wildfire spreading to structures by minimizing pockets or peninsulas, or islands of flammable vegetation within a development.

Policy S-3.4: Service Availability. Plan for development where fire and emergency services are available or planned.

Policy S-3.5: Access Roads. Require development to provide additional access roads when necessary to provide for safe access of emergency equipment and civilian evacuation concurrently.

Policy S-3.6: Fire Protection Measures. Ensure that development located within fire threat areas implement measures that reduce the risk of structural and human loss due to wildfire.  Policy S-3.7: Fire Resistant Construction. Require all new, remodeled, or rebuilt

structures to meet current ignition resistance construction codes and establish and enforce reasonable and prudent standards that support retrofitting of existing structures in high fire threat areas.

 Policy S-4.2: Coordination to Minimize Fuel Management Impacts. Consider comments from CAL FIRE, U.S. Forest Service, local fire districts, and wildlife agencies for recommendations regarding mitigation for impacts to habitat and species into fuel management projects.

Policy S6.1: Water Supply. Ensure that water supply systems for development are adequate to combat structural and wildland fires.

Policy S-6.3: Funding Fire Protection Services. Require development to contribute its fair share towards funding the provision of appropriate fire and emergency medical services as determined necessary to adequately serve the project.

Policy S-6.4: Fire Protection Services for Development. Require that development demonstrate that fire services can be provided that meet the minimum travel times identified in Table S-1 (Travel Time Standards) (20 minutes in the RL-40, 80, and 160 land use designations).

Policy S-6.5: Concurrency of Fire Protection Services. Ensure that fire protection staffing, facilities and equipment required to serve development are operating prior to, or in conjunction with, the development. Allow incremental growth to occur until a new facility can be supported by development.

(19)

Policy S-11.1: Land Use Location. Require that land uses involving the storage, transfer, or processing of hazardous materials be located and designed to minimize risk and comply with all applicable hazardous materials regulations.

Policy S-11.3: Hazards Sensitive Uses. Require that land uses using hazardous materials be located and designed to ensure sensitive uses, such a schools, hospitals, day care centers, and residential neighborhoods, are protected. Similarly, avoid locating sensitive uses near established hazardous materials users or High Impact Industrial areas where incompatibilities would result.

Policy S-11.4: Contaminated Lands. Require areas of known or suspected contamination to be assessed prior to reuse. The reuse shall be in a manner that is compatible with the nature of the contamination and subsequent remediation efforts.

Policy S-11.5: Development Adjacent to Agricultural Operations. Require development adjacent to existing agricultural operations in Semi-Rural and Rural Lands to adequately buffer agricultural areas and ensure compliance with relevant safety codes where pesticides or other hazardous materials are used.

Policy S-15.3: Hazardous Obstructions within Airport Approach and Departure. Restrict development of potentially hazardous obstructions or other hazards to flight located within airport approach and departure areas or known flight patterns and discourage uses that may impact airport operations or do not meet Federal or State aviation standards (County of San Diego 2011c).

Subregional Plans

The Proposed Project site is located within the Mountain Empire Subregional Plan and the Jacumba Subregional Group Area Community Plan planning area boundaries. There are no policies relevant to hazards or hazardous materials in the Mountain Empire Subregional Plan or Jacumba Subregional Group Area.

2.4.3 Analysis of Project Effects and Determination as to Significance

Because the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment identified no recognized environmental conditions or potential sources of hazardous materials or contamination on the Project properties, evaluation of the Proposed Project against the thresholds for projects with on-site contamination is not warranted.

(20)

2.4.3.1 Hazardous Materials

Guidelines for the Determination of Significance

For the purposes of this Environmental Impact Report (EIR), the County’s Guidelines for Determining Significance and Report Format and Content Requirements – Hazardous Materials and Existing Contamination (Hazardous Materials Guidelines; County of San Diego 2007a) applies to both the direct impact analysis and the cumulative impact analysis. A project would generally be considered to have a significant effect if it proposes any of the following, absent specific evidence to the contrary. Conversely, if a project does not propose any of the following, it would generally not be considered to have a significant effect related to hazardous substances and existing contamination, absent specific evidence of such an effect:

 The project is a business, operation, or facility that proposes to handle hazardous substances in excess of the threshold quantities listed in Chapter 6.95 of the Health and Safety Code (H&SC), generate hazardous waste regulated under Chapter 6.5 of the H&SC, and/or store hazardous substances in underground storage tanks regulated under Chapter 6.7 of the H&SC, and the project will not be able to comply with applicable hazardous substance regulations.

 The project is a business, operation, or facility that would handle regulated substances subject to CalARP risk management plan requirements that in the event of a release could adversely affect children’s health due to the presence of a school or day care within one-quarter mile of the facility.

Analysis

During construction, operation and maintenance, and demolition of the Proposed Project, hazardous materials, such as petroleum products and maintenance chemicals, would be brought to and used on the site. Numerous federal, state, and local regulations exist that require strict adherence to specific guidelines regarding the use, transportation, and disposal of such hazardous materials. Regulations that would be required of those transporting, using or disposing of hazardous materials are discussed above and include RCRA, CERCLA, the Hazardous Materials Transportation Act, the International Fire Code, Title 22 and Title 27 of the California Code of Regulations, and the County Consolidated Fire Code. The Project site would include the use and storage of limited quantities of lubricants and cleaners potentially covered under Chapter 6.95 of the Health and Safety Code (H&SC), which would be used to maintain the on-site equipment and facilities. Storage and handling of any materials covered under Chapter 6.95 of the H&SC would be undertaken in accordance with all applicable regulations. No underground storage tanks are proposed as a part of the Project. PV panels typically contain stable components such as silicon and metal, which would not pose a hazardous materials concern. The silicon in some panels may

(21)

be infused with trace amounts of chemicals such as boron or phosphorous. However, the small amounts of these chemicals would not pose a hazard in the unlikely event of panel failure and release. The battery storage system would likely be a lithium ion type that contains lithium ions in some compound such as lithium manganese oxide. Release of the lithium is unlikely due to the rigorous construction and regulations such as UL1642, lithium cell safety standards. The primary hazards associated with these types of batteries are overheating and fire, which are discussed in Section 3.1.6, Public Services, and Section 2.4.3.3, Wildfire Hazards.

The Project would include a step-up transformer that would contain approximately 6,000 gallons of mineral oil, which would necessitate the need to develop a Hazardous Materials Business Plan (HMBP) in accordance with Chapter 6.95 of the H&SC, Division 20, (AB 2185 & AB 2189). The project is designed to comply with the requirement of Chapter 6.95 of the H&SC, including containment provisions for potential spills by containing the materials within boxed components and mounting these on concrete foundations. The Project would not include any other on-site storage, use, or transport of hazardous materials as a part of normal operations in quantities equal to or greater than 55 gallons, 500 pounds, or 200 cubic feet of substances classified as hazardous materials. All storage, handling, transport, emission, and disposal of hazardous substances shall be in full compliance with federal, state, and local regulations. California Government Code Section 65850.2 requires that no final certificate of occupancy or its substantial equivalent be issued unless there is verification that the owner or authorized agent has met, or is meeting, the applicable requirements of the H&SC, Division 20, Chapter 6.95, Article 2, Sections 25500– 25520. The Proposed Project would be able to comply with applicable hazardous substance regulations and impacts would, therefore, be less than significant.

The Proposed Project is not located within 0.25 mile of a school and would not include the use of a regulated substance subject to CalARP risk management plan requirements (19 CCR, Division 2, Chapter 4.5). The nearest school is the Jacumba Elementary School, located at 44343 Old Highway 80, approximately 3.5 miles west of the Project site. As such, the Proposed Project would not expose a school or daycare facility to regulated substances that could adversely affect children’s health.

Based on the analysis provided, the Proposed Project would comply with hazardous substance regulations, would not expose persons to hazardous materials, and would not produce hazardous emissions within 0.25 mile of an existing or proposed school or day care facility. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.

(22)

2.4.3.2 Airport Hazards

Guidelines for the Determination of Significance

For the purposes of this EIR, the County’s Guidelines for Determining Significance and Report Format and Content Requirements – Airport Hazards (Airport Hazards Guidelines; County of San Diego 2007b) applies to the direct and indirect impact analysis, as well as the cumulative impact analysis.

A significant impact would result if:

 The project is located within an established AIA for a public airport or public use airport and proposes a development intensity, flight obstruction, or other land use that conflicts with the ALUCP or CLUP (if no ALUCP is adopted) and as a result, the project may result in a significant airport hazard.

 Conflicts with FAA Regulations: The proposed project is determined by the FAA to constitute a hazard to aviation based on FAA review of Form 7460-1, is inconsistent with current FAA Heliport Design Criteria for Heliports not subject to an ALUCP or CLUP, or conflicts with FAA rules or regulations related to airport hazards and as a result, the project may result in a significant airport hazard.

Analysis

As discussed above, the nearest registered airport is the Jacumba Airport located approximately one and a half miles west of the Project site. The airport is unattended and unlighted and is mainly used as a glider facility by single-engine aircraft and sailplanes, with activity predominately occurring during weekends in non-summer months. The Proposed Project is located within 1.5 miles of the Jacumba airport, and according to the Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ACLUP) a portion of the property is within Airport Influence Area 2 of the AIA, on the far side of some intervening high terrain (Figure 2.4-1). Influence Area 2 is concerned with height of developments based on the “conical surface,” which is the elevations at which aircraft navigate in proximity to the airport. The Proposed Project structures would be below the conical surface for the Jacumba Airport and would not represent an incompatible use. The gen-tie line associated with the Proposed Project is outside the AIA. Because of topographical conditions between the Jacumba Airport and the Project site, as well as the low aircraft activity and modeled flight paths, and because the Proposed Project does not include incompatible uses, the Project would not cause a safety hazard associated with air traffic in the area.

Notification of the FAA may not be required because of the presence of the “shielding” topography between the airport and the Project site per Part 77 Section 77.9(e)(1). The shielding topographic feature (Airport Mesa) reaches an elevation of approximately 3,600 feet above mean

(23)

sea level (amsl), while the Jacumba Airport is at an elevation of approximately 2,800 feet amsl and the Project site is at an elevation between approximately 3,100 feet and 3,200 feet amsl. With the tallest possible Project feature being the gen-tie poles, which would be a maximum height of approximately 150 feet, the tallest Project components would be approximately 250 feet below the elevation of the intervening or shielding topography. The FAA made a formal determination of no hazard to air navigation on March 6, 2015.

While the FAA Solar Guide focuses on the design considerations and application of solar panels at airport sites, there is some guidance pertaining to reflectivity of solar technology that may apply. However, as previously stated in Section 2.4.2, the FAA cautions users against relying on the reflectivity section as the FAA is reviewing it based on new information and field experience (FAA 2010). It should also be noted that pursuant to the Code of Federal Regulations, Section 91.119 of the General Operating and Flight Rules, aircraft may not be operated closer than 500 feet to any person, vessel, vehicle, or structure except when necessary for takeoff or landing (14 CFR 91.119). The Proposed Project is not located adjacent to a landing strip and would not result in substantial glare, although brief periods of glare potential exist immediately west of the facility shortly after sunrise and immediately east of the facility shortly before sunset at specific times of the year. The solar facility would be directed southwards towards the sun and include PV technology that is designed to maximize absorption and avoid reflectivity of solar light to realize the greatest potential conversion to electricity. Please refer to Section 2.1, Aesthetics, of this EIR for a discussion of glare relative to the Proposed Project. The necessarily low glare of the facility combined with the orientation of the facility to the south, away from approaching aviation users, would ensure that the Proposed Project would not cause a significant impact to aircraft as a result of glare. Further, because of the presence of topography either side of the site (Airport Mesa and Jacumba Mountains) the window for glare would be below the conical surface and would affect aircraft pilots and the FAA is not requiring any markings or alterations and did not find any hazard associated with glare. The intervening presence of Airport Mesa also results in the Project components, including the transmission poles, being below heights that would cause safety concerns for the FAA and no lighting or marking requirements are anticipated as a result.

The Proposed Project would have no impact on airports or air traffic in the area.

2.4.3.3 Wildfire Hazards

Guidelines for the Determination of Significance

For the purposes of this EIR, the County’s Guidelines for Determining Significance and Report Format and Content Requirements – Wildland Fire and Fire Protection (Wildland Fire Protection Guidelines; County of San Diego 2010c) applies to the direct and indirect impact analysis, as well as the cumulative impact analysis.

(24)

An affirmative response to, or confirmation of any one of the following guidelines, will generally be considered a significant impact related to wildland fire and fire protection as a result of the project, in the absence of evidence to the contrary:

 The project cannot demonstrate compliance with all applicable fire codes.

 A comprehensive Fire Protection Plan has been accepted, and the project is inconsistent with its recommendations.

 The project does not meet the emergency response objectives identified in the Public Facilities Element of the County General Plan or offer feasible alternatives that achieve comparable emergency response objectives [addressed in section 2.4.3.4, Hazards Associated with Emergency Responses incorporated by reference herein.]

Analysis

As stated above, the Proposed Project site is located within an area classified as Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone by CAL FIRE (Appendix 2.4-2). Vegetation on the site and adjacent sites is dominated by chaparral species, which represent fuels that would spread wildfire on and off the site. Based on the region’s fuels, fire history, and expected fire behavior, a high-intensity fire can be expected to occur in the area (Dudek 2013), which poses a potentially significant hazard to those working on the site and in the surrounding area.

An increase in the risk of wildland fire on the site would occur during construction when there is the largest amount of fuel on the site and increased activity combined with a greater number of ignition sources on the site. Similarly, an increase in the risk of wildland fire would occur during decommissioning, when there is increased activity and ignition sources on the site. Potential ignition sources during construction and related activities include chainsaws, wood chippers, grinders, torches, earthmoving equipment, and other vehicles that could create sparks, be a source of heat, or leak flammable materials, which would increase the possibility of fire. Because the details of the construction methods, approach, and responsibilities are not determined until a contractor is awarded a contract, the final construction fire prevention plan (CFPP) cannot be included as a technical study. Therefore, the Proposed Project would result in a potentially significant wildfire hazards impacts (Impact HZ-1) without the preparation of a Construction FPP that has been accepted by the County and that either requires the Proposed Project comply with all applicable fire codes for construction or incorporates site-specific modifications that (a) explain why the strict compliance is impractical, (b) complies with the intent and purpose of the code, and (c) do not lessen health, life and fire safety standards. The FPP for operation of the Project does include a Conceptual CFPP, which contains the elements necessary for the CFPP to assess he potential impact is mitigated to below a level of significance.

(25)

Further, preparation of the County-required traffic control plan and construction notification procedures would provide safe and efficient traffic flow in the area and on site during construction activities, which would also ensure safe access to the site and surrounding properties by emergency responders.

During operations and maintenance the Proposed Project and gen-tie line would introduce potential ignition sources that do not currently exist on the site. The equipment on the site that may be ignition sources during operation and maintenance includes transformers, capacitors, electric transmission lines (including the gen-tie line), substations, vehicles, and gas- or electric-powered small hand tools. Depending on the type of lithium ion battery selected for the Project, the potential hazards are primarily associated with the possibility of thermal runaway (similar to overheating) occurring from a malfunctioning or damaged battery. Newer battery technologies have minimized the occurrence of thermal runaway through a system of protections including internal cell monitoring and partitioning; use of non-flammable chemicals; container design and features; ventilation, and air-conditioning (HVAC) systems; and inert gas fire suppression systems. The site’s inverters and solar panels represent potential ignition sources that have a low likelihood of causing fires. All of this equipment represents a risk of sparking or igniting nearby off-site flammable vegetation. All battery components would be on concrete avoiding contact with ignition sources and would not include liquids that could spill.

Additionally, the Proposed Project represents a potential challenge to firefighters due to accessibility within the site. The site cannot typically provide code-consistent fire apparatus access for all structures, which results in some structures being farther than 150 feet from fire apparatus access roads. However, the site is accessible via smaller, lighter, and more maneuverable vehicles that are available. Because the rural area fire stations often are staffed with volunteer firefighters, there may be challenges due to lack of appropriate training for effectively and safely responding around new solar facilities. To reduce the risk of fire on the site and improve the effectiveness of an emergency response should a fire occur on site, a County-required site-specific Fire Protection Plan (FPP) for the Proposed Project (Appendix 2.4-2) would be implemented.

The FPP is consistent with the 2014 County Consolidated Fire Code and the County Building and Electrical Codes and employs all related CPUC regulations, including General Order 95: Rules for Overhead Electric Line Construction. The FPP considered the topography, geology, combustible vegetation (fuel types), climatic conditions and fire history of the Proposed Project location; as well as addressed, in terms of compliance with applicable codes and regulations including, but was not limited to: water supply, primary and secondary access, travel time to the nearest fire station, structure setback from property lines, ignition-resistant building features, fire protection systems and equipment, impacts to existing emergency services, defensible space and vegetation management. Customized measures were developed

Figure

Updating...

References

Updating...

Related subjects :