• No results found

Historical Perspective

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Historical Perspective"

Copied!
7
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

ESOP

 

Cash

 

Management,

 

ESOP

 

Cash

 

Management,

g

g

,

,

 

Secret

 

Innovations

 

in

 

Secret

 

Innovations

 

in

 

Repurchase

 

Obligations

Repurchase

 

Obligations

1

Repurchase

 

Obligation

 

Repurchase

 

Obligation

 

i

t

h fl

d

i

t

h fl

d

impacts

 

on

 

cash

 

flow

 

and

 

impacts

 

on

 

cash

 

flow

 

and

 

the

 

attributable

 

valuation

 

the

 

attributable

 

valuation

 

discount

discount

Scott

 

Miller,

 

Enterprise

 

Services,

 

Inc.

Scott

 

Miller,

 

Enterprise

 

Services,

 

Inc.

2

Prior

Prior

 

 

to

to

 

 

1998:

1998:

 

 

ESOPs

ESOPs

 

 

“C”

“C”

 

 

Corp

Corp

Most

Most

 

 

ESOPs

ESOPs

 

 

minority

minority

 

 

position

position

 

 

IRC

IRC

 

 

Sect.

Sect.

 

 

1042

1042

 

 

Rollover

Rollover

 

 

popular

popular

F

F

if

if

100% ESOP

100% ESOP

Historical

 

Perspective

Few

Few

 

 

if

if

 

 

any

any

 

 

100%

100%

 

 

ESOPs

ESOPs

Repurchase

Repurchase

 

 

obligation

obligation

 

 

immaterial

immaterial

Employee

Employee

 

 

owned

owned

 

 

company

company

 

 

not

not

 

 

the

the

 

 

end

end

 

 

destination

destination

(2)

ESOPs

ESOPs

 

 

in

in

 

 

“S”

“S”

 

 

Corporations

Corporations

 

 

EGTRRA

EGTRRA

 

 

(2001)

(2001)

 

 

breakout

breakout

 

 

period

period

 

 

Discover

Discover

 

 

that

that

 

 

100%

100%

 

 

S

S

 

 

ESOP

ESOP

 

 

is

is

 

 

free

free

 

 

of

of

 

 

i

t

bli ti

i

t

bli ti

ESOP

 

Renaissance

 

in

 

1998

income

 

tax

 

obligations

income

 

tax

 

obligations

Estimated

Estimated

 

 

80

80

‐‐

90%

90%

 

 

ESOPs

ESOPs

 

 

are

are

 

 

“S”

“S”

Most

Most

 

 

ESOP

ESOP

 

 

“S”

“S”

 

 

Corps

Corps

 

 

are

are

 

 

100%

100%

 

 

(or

(or

 

 

migrating

 

toward

 

100%)

 

migrating

 

toward

 

100%)

 

4

Repurchase

Repurchase

 

 

obligation

obligation

 

 

(RO)

(RO)

 

 

issues

issues

  

  

RO

RO

 

 

now

now

 

 

material

material

 

 

for

for

 

 

most

most

 

 

ESOPs

ESOPs

ESOPs

ESOPs

 

 

should

should

 

 

have

have

 

 

RO

RO

 

 

study

study

Ab

Ab

t RO t d FMV

t RO t d FMV

ld b i

ld b i

t d

t d

Many

 

ESOPs

 

control

 

position

Absent

Absent

 

 

RO

RO

 

 

study,

study,

 

 

FMV

FMV

 

 

could

could

 

 

be

be

 

 

impacted

impacted

 

 

by

 

lack

 

of

 

planning

by

 

lack

 

of

 

planning

Many

Many

 

 

ESOPs

ESOPs

 

 

have

have

 

 

excess

excess

 

 

liquidity

liquidity

 

 

Volatile

Volatile

 

 

economy

economy

 

 

(since

(since

 

 

2008)

2008)

Ignoring

Ignoring

 

 

RO

RO

 

 

could

could

 

 

negatively

negatively

 

 

impact

impact

 

 

BV

BV

5

Funding

 

repurchase

 

Funding

 

repurchase

 

obligations

 

through

 

obligations

 

through

 

traditional

 

investments

traditional

 

investments

6

(3)

1.

1. Use

Use

 

 

cash

cash

 

 

flow

flow

 

 

to

to

 

 

handle

handle

 

 

liability

liability

2.

2. Use

Use

 

 

leverage

leverage

 

 

to

to

 

 

handle

handle

 

 

liability

liability

3.

3. Rare

Rare

 

 

instances

instances

 

 

money

money

 

 

would

would

 

 

be

be

 

 

put

put

 

 

away,

away,

 

 

sinking

sinking

 

 

fund, to handle liability

fund, to handle liability

Historical

 

ESOP

 

RO

 

Liability

 

Solution

fund,

 

to

 

handle

 

liability

fund,

 

to

 

handle

 

liability

4.

4. Rarely

Rarely

 

 

was

was

 

 

an

an

 

 

Investment

Investment

 

 

policy

policy

 

 

Statement

Statement

 

 

created

created

 

 

or

 

or

 

used

used

7

1.

1. Use

Use

 

 

of

of

 

 

a

a

 

 

Repurchase

Repurchase

 

 

Liability

Liability

 

 

study

study

 

 

is

is

 

 

common

common

2.

2. Creation

Creation

 

 

and

and

 

 

use

use

 

 

of

of

 

 

an

an

 

 

Investment

Investment

 

 

Policy

Policy

 

 

Statement

Statement

 

 

is

 

common

is

 

common

3.

3. We

We commonly see a mixture of different strategies

commonly see a mixture of different strategies

Common

 

ESOP

 

Repurchase

 

Liability

 

Solutions

3.

3. We

We

 

 

commonly

commonly

 

 

see

see

 

 

a

a

 

 

mixture

mixture

 

 

of

of

 

 

different

different

 

 

strategies

strategies

 

 

to

 

to

 

address

address

 

 

the

the

 

 

repurchase

repurchase

 

 

Liability

Liability

 

 

issue

issue

 

 

i.e.

i.e.

a)

a) Life

Life

 

 

Insurance

Insurance

b)

b) CD’s

CD’s

 

 

and

and

 

 

different

different

 

 

Fixed

Fixed

 

 

Income

Income

 

 

Investments

Investments

c)

c) Equities

Equities

 

 

(i.e

(i.e.

.

 

 

ETF’s,

ETF’s,

 

 

Structured

Structured

 

 

Products

Products

 

 

or

or

 

 

Ind.

Ind.

 

 

Equities)

Equities)

4.

4. The

The

 

 

Repurchase

Repurchase

 

 

issue

issue

 

 

is

is

 

 

part

part

 

 

of

of

 

 

regular

regular

 

 

meetings

meetings

 

 

now.

 

(i.e

now.

 

(i.e.

.

 

 

Quarterly

Quarterly

 

 

Board

Board

 

 

meetings)

meetings)

8

Recently

 

approved

 

application for managing

application

 

for

 

managing

 

and

 

monitoring

 

cash

 

flows

 

for

 

repurchase

 

obligations

(4)

New

 

Investment

 

Application

 

for

 

ESOPs

Preserve

 

purchasing

 

power

 

(inflation)

Align

 

other

 

investment

 

account

 

to

 

mirror

 

economic

 

performance

 

of

 

public

 

companies

Prudent

 

behavior

 

to

 

match

 

investments

 

with

 

repurchase

 

obligations

 

Market

 

based

 

investment

 

with

 

FDIC

 

principle

 

protection

10

Suggested

 

Key

 

Features

 

of

 

Market

 

Linked

 

Deposits

 

(MLD)

FDIC

 

Principle

 

Protection

Link

 

returns

 

to

 

a

 

market

 

index

o

S&P

 

500,

 

Dow,

 

etc…

i

l

l l i

Simple

 

return

 

calculation

o

Point

 

to

 

point

 

return

 

X

 

Participation

 

%

Fee

 

Transparency

 

Pre

approved

 

liquidity

 

options

11

FDIC

 

Issued

 

Favorable

 

Ruling

 

– Sep

 

13,

 

2013

FDIC

 

Ruling

 

Summary:

 

Each

 

ESOP

 

Plan

 

Participant’s

 

FDIC

 

Insurance

 

Coverage

 

passes through to the

passes

 

through

 

to

 

the

 

ESOP

 

Trust.

 

Calculation

 

Example:

 

Largest

 

owner

 

%

 

=

 

10%

$250,000

 

/

 

10%

 

=

 

$2,500,000

 

of

 

available

 

FDIC

 

Coverage

 

per

 

FDIC

 

(5)

$166K $156K 56% Gain $150 $175 )

$100,000

 

invested

 

at

 

85%

 

Participation

 

(12/31/03

 

to

 

12/31/13)

S&P 500 (w/o div) Projected Investment 

10

 

Year

 

S&P

 

500

 

MLD

 

@

 

85%

 

Participation

 

Example

 

1

 

$50 $75 $100 $125 $100k   In ve st m e n t   (T housand s) Maturity Value

FDIC

 

Insurance

(floor)

13

S&P500 (without dividends) performance data from Bloomberg. Market Linked Deposit data is hypothetical performance data. Please see Disclosures at the end of this presentation.

$100K 0% Loss $100  $125  s)

$100,000

 

invested

 

at

 

85%

 

Participation

 

(2/28/1999

 

to

 

2/28/2009)

10

 

Year

 

S&P

 

500

 

MLD

 

@

 

85%

 

Participation

 

Example

 

2

FDIC

 

Insurance

(floor)

$59K – Not Applicable $‐ $25  $50  $75  $100k   In ve st m e n t   (T housand s

S&P 500 (w/o div) Projected Investment 

Maturity Value

14

S&P500 (without dividends) performance data from Bloomberg. Market Linked Deposit data is hypothetical performance data. Please see Disclosures at the end of this presentation.

Archford

 

FDIC

 

Coverage

 

Calculator

 

– Provisional

 

Patent

Go

 

to

 

www.fdiccalc.com

 

for

 

more

 

information

(6)

Disclosures

Archford Capital Strategies ("Archford") is a registered investment advisor. Information contained in this  report is for informational purposes only and should not be considered investment advice or  recommendations. Advice may only be provided after entering into an advisory agreement with Archford.  This document is for informational purposes only. The information and data presented herein has been  prepared on the basis of the publicly available information, internally developed data or other third party  sources. No guarantee is given as to the accuracy, completeness, or reasonableness of the contents 

t i d h i

16

contained herein.

Investing involves risk, including the possible loss of all principal and returns thereon. The investment will  fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost.  There is no guarantee that investment objectives will be met.

This material contains hypothetical performance data. Hypothetical performance results have many inherent  limitations. No representation is being made that any account will achieve profits or losses similar to those  shown. In fact, there are frequently material differences between hypothetical performance results and the  actual results subsequently achieved by any particular portfolio strategy.

Speaker

 

Information

Speaker

p

p

 

Information

17

James

 

D.

 

Maher

 

CEPA®,

 

CRPC®,

 

CRPS®

Archford Capital Strategies

Chief Executive Office and Founder

In addition to focusing on wealth management, estate planning, concentrated stock strategies and  investment management at Archford Capital Strategies, Jim focuses on the needs of closely‐held  business owners. He has worked to create a network of professionals to assist business owners with  a range of solutions to business continuation – from ESOPs to buyouts and sales. A Certified Exit  Plan Advisor (CEPA), he works with outsourced – as well as the group’s own – attorneys, CPA's,  business valuation specialists and marketing/employee education companies establishing resources 

f b i i t iti Th t h l d t b i d t l di Fi i l

18 for business owners in transition. The team has evolved to be industry‐leading Financial  Consultants.

Jim is an award‐winning, nationally‐recognized authority in estate planning, business  transition and philanthropy for closely held businesses, and a sought after trainer and  presenter on a range of topics. He holds a BS and JD from the University of Missouri‐ Columbia. He is a member of the Missouri Bar, The Exit Planning Institute, The National  Center for Employee Ownership and the St. Louis Estate Planning Council. Jim holds the  designations of Chartered Retirement Planning CounselorSM(CRPC®), Certified Exit Plan  Advisor (CEPA) and Chartered Retirement Planning Specialist (CRPS).

Contact Information:

Phone: (618) 416‐7081 or (855) 293‐5125 (toll free) Email: [email protected]

(7)

Scott

 

Miller

 

CPA/ABV,

 

CVA

Enterprise Services, Inc.

President

As an entrepreneur himself, Scott understands closely held and family‐owned businesses. He  balances that perspective with years of corporate experience, starting his career at a national public  accounting firm, going on to serve as a VP of Finance and plan fiduciary for a large ESOP company.  He then served as a principal in several family businesses, and founded ESI in 1993. At ESI, he’s helped hundreds of businesses through transition planning, including valuations, 

t t i l i fi i f i i i t i ti d liti ti t

19 strategic planning, financing, fairness opinions, terminations and litigation support. As a nationally recognized authority on business valuations, he’s published widely in professional  journals and is a sought‐after speaker for professional and industry groups. He’s authored technical  seminars for the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and the National Association of  Certified Valuation Analysts. Scott has an undergraduate degree from Kenyon College and an MBA  from the Cornell University Johnson Graduate School of Management. He is a CPA with additional  business valuation accreditation from the AICPA and NACVA.

Contact Information:

Phone: (262) 646‐6490 Email: esi@esi‐enterprise.com

References

Related documents

There were also levitations of the medium onto the table, with the hands and legs well-controlled; touches, and a special demonstration by John for JO, with Eusapia’s hand clasping

In the essay Richet pre- sented an outline of aspects of his psychic career, including: Early interest in hypnosis and hypnotic lucidity, encounters with gifted individuals such

There was always some delay in these manifestations, as happens with a physical echo. The less light there was in the room, the stronger the sound would be... Upon seeing

Five known poets of the Elizabethan period, Ben Jonson, Edmund Spenser, Edward de Vere, Thomas Nashe, and Leonard Digges, joined by two publishers of Shakespeare’s sonnets, Thomas

Abstract—The case of the Brazilian medium Carlos Mirabelli is one of the most tantalizing and frustrating in psychical research.. If

Some modern psychologists have discussed psychic phenomena in the congresses, seemingly adopting the perspective that the disappearance of psychical research was a desirable

As he expressed at the 3rd International Congress of Psychical Research in Paris in 1927, the place of metapsychics should be as a branch of a more general science, the

The book Shadow Land makes no mention of the separation or widowhood but continues with a detailed account of her later life as a medium beginning with the 10-year period in