• No results found

Compliance Certification

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Compliance Certification"

Copied!
500
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Compliance Certification

Part 1: Signature Page

Part 2: List of Substantive Changes

Part 3: Assessment of Compliance with the

Principles of Accreditation

Core Requirements

Comprehensive Standards

Federal Requirements

Part 4: Institutional Summary Form

Part 5: Organizational Chart

Submitted to the

Commission on Colleges

of the

Southern Association of Colleges and Schools

for Review by the

Off-Site Reaffirmation Committee

for the

Purpose of Reaffirmation of Accreditation

By

Southwest Georgia Technical College

15689 U.S. Highway 19 North

Thomasville, GA 31792

229-225-4096

www.southwestgatech.edu

President: Dr. Craig R. Wentworth

COC Liaison: Dr. Debbie Goodman

(2)

Part

1:

Signature

(3)
(4)

Part

2:

Substantive

(5)

Part 2. LIST OF SUBSTANTIVE CHANGES APPROVED

SINCE THE LAST REAFFIRMATION

Directions: For each substantive change approved since the institution’s initial accreditation or last reaffirmation review, briefly describe the change and provide the date of Commission approval. If no substantive changes requiring approval have been submitted since the last comprehensive review, write “none” in the first column. If, in the review of substantive change, the institution discovers substantive changes that have not been reported according to Commission policy, the changes should be reported immediately to Commission staff.

Substantive changes requiring approval:

• Initiating certificate or degree programs at a more advanced degree level

• Initiating an off-campus site at which students can earn at least 50 percent of credits toward a degree • Initiating a branch campus

• Initiating any change in legal status, governance, form of control, or ownership of the institution

• Expanding the institution’s programs at the current degree level through the addition of significantly different programs

• Initiating programs at a lower degree level • Initiating a consolidation or merger

Access hhtp://www.sacscoc.org and click onto “Policies” for additional information on reporting substantive change, including examples of the changes listed above.

Approval Date Description of Substantive Change

11-15-2006 Increase SWGTC online courses beyond 50% for Criminal

Justice-associate degree, diploma; Early Childhood Care and Education-Justice-associate degree, diploma; Accounting-associate degree, diploma.

[Note: First technical certificate of credit online program approved during reaffirmation visit, May 6-9, 2002 so not included in this substantive change.]

7-16-2008 Offer SWGTC Respiratory Care Technology Degree Program at Albany Technical College, Albany, Georgia.

[Note: Program not implemented at this site.]

2-24-2009 Offer SWGTC Associate Degree Nursing Program at Valdosta Technical College, Valdosta, Georgia.

[Note: Valdosta Technical College was renamed Wiregrass Georgia Technical College.]

6-11-2009 Add Social Work Associate Degree to SWGTC Main Campus program inventory.

6-19-2009 Offer Law Enforcement Investigations Assistant, Technical Certificate of Credit program at Baconton Community Charter School, Baconton, Georgia.

3-03-2010 Offer Management and Supervisory Development Degree, Diploma, and Supervisor/Manager Specialist, Technical Certificate of Credit program at Cleaver Brooks, Inc., Thomasville, Georgia.

3-05-2010 Offer Law Enforcement Investigations Assistant, Technical Certificate of Credit program at Pelham High School, Pelham, Georgia.

3-05-2010 Offer Patient Care Assisting, Technical Certificate of Credit program at Mitchell County High School, Camilla, Georgia.

(6)

Part

3:

Compliance

(7)

Southwest Georgia Technical College

Compliance Certification

Table of Contents

Page

Core Requirements

2.1 ... 1

2.2 ... 3

2.3 ... 5

2.4 ... 7

2.5 ... 13

2.6 ... 45

2.7.1 ... 47

2.7.2 ... 51

2.7.3 ... 57

2.7.4 ... 65

2.8 ... 69

2.9 ... 85

2.10 ... 107

2.11.1 ... 131

2.11.2 ... 139

2.12 ... 145

Comprehensive Standards

3.1.1 ... 147

3.2.1 ... 155

3.2.2 ... 157

3.2.3 ... 161

3.2.4 ... 163

3.2.5 ... 167

3.2.6 ... 169

3.2.7 ... 171

3.2.8 ... 175

3.2.9 ... 179

3.2.10 ... 181

3.2.11 ... 183

3.2.12 ... 185

3.2.13 ... 187

3.2.14 ... 189

3.3.1 ... 191

3.3.2 ... 217

3.4.1 ... 219

3.4.2 ... 225

3.4.3 ... 231

3.4.4 ... 237

3.4.5 ... 245

(8)

3.4.6 ... 251

3.4.7 ... 255

3.4.8 ... 257

3.4.9 ... 261

3.4.10 ... 273

3.4.11 ... 279

3.4.12 ... 287

3.5.1 ... 293

3.5.2 ... 299

3.5.3 ... 301

3.5.4 ... 305

3.6.1 ... 307

3.6.2 ... 309

3.6.3 ... 311

3.6.4 ... 313

3.7.1 ... 315

3.7.2 ... 319

3.7.3 ... 331

3.7.4 ... 337

3.7.5 ... 339

3.8.1 ... 355

3.8.2 ... 367

3.8.3 ... 373

3.9.1 ... 381

3.9.2 ... 383

3.9.3 ... 387

3.10.1 ... 395

3.10.2 ... 399

3.10.3 ... 401

3.10.4 ... 403

3.10.5 ... 407

3.11.1 ... 411

3.11.2 ... 415

3.11.3 ... 419

3.12.1 ... 425

3.13.1 ... 429

3.14.1 ... 431

Federal Requirements

4.1 ... 433

4.2 ... 439

4.3 ... 445

4.4 ... 447

4.5 ... 453

4.6 ... 457

4.7 ... 461

(9)

Compliance Certification:

Core Requirements

(10)

2.1

Degree-granting Authority

The institution has degree-granting authority from the appropriate government agency or agencies.

Judgment

Compliant Non-Compliant Not Applicable

Narrative

Southwest Georgia Technical College (SWGTC) has the authority to grant technical

certificates, diplomas, and associate degrees from the appropriate government agency, the Technical College System of Georgia (TCSG), formerly known as the Georgia Department of Technical and Adult Education (GDTAE). On January 28, 2008, the TCSG issued to the College a College Award Letter granting this authority, retroactive to July 1, 2002. On behalf of the TCSG and the State Board of Technical and Adult Education (State Board), both government entities, Dr. Freida Hill, Acting Deputy Commissioner, issued the College Award Letter to SWGTC; the agency being TCSG and the authority being the State Board. In 1988, the Georgia General Assembly created the GDTAE, and the Official Code of Georgia Annotated (OCGA) § 20-4-14 established the governing board as the State Board of Technical and Adult Education. Under the provisions of OCGA 20-4-11, the Official Code of Georgia empowers the State Board to grant degrees. The OCGA 20-4-11 states that the State Board can:

(10) Approve a request by a postsecondary technical school or institution governed under this chapter to be named a technical college upon the approval and granting of occupational degree-granting status by the State Board of Technical and Adult Education and upon receiving accreditation by the Commission on Colleges of the Southern Association of

Schools, the Council on Occupational Education, or any other appropriate accrediting agency approved by the United States Secretary of Education. The use of the name technical

college shall not alter the governance of the technical school or institution as established under this chapter nor shall it abridge the authority of the Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia under the Constitution of this state.

In 2000, Bill 1187, known as the A+ Education Reform Act changed the names of technical institutes to technical colleges. Thus, Thomas Technical Institute became Southwest Georgia Technical College.

(11)

In 2008, the Georgia General Assembly amended OCGA 20-4-14 A, changing the name of the Georgia Department of Technical and Adult Education to the Technical College System of Georgia and empowering TCSG to “Approve occupational programs below the baccalaureate level; provided, however, any courses to be transferable to units of the University System of Georgia shall be approved by the Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia . . ."

As indicated in State Board policy I.C.1. State Board Responsibilities and Authority, the State Board “shall approve all new technical education programs for public

postsecondary technical education and the deletion or modification of existing

programs.” The TCSG Report AP01 includes a list of programs that the State Board approved for SWGTC.

Sources

College Award Letter

I. C. 1. State Board Responsibilities and AuthorityO.C.G.A § 20-4-14

O.C.G.A. § 20-4-14 AO.C.G.A. 20.4.11TCSG Report AP01

The image cannot be displayed. Your computer may not have enough memory to open the image, or the image may have been corrupted. Restart your computer, and then open the file again. If the red x still appears, you may have to delete the image and then insert it again. The image cannot be displayed. Your computer may not have enough memory to open the image, or the image may have been corrupted. Restart your computer, and then open the file again. If the red x still appears, you may have to delete the image and then insert it again. The image cannot be displayed. Your computer may not have enough memory to open the image, or the image may have been corrupted. Restart your computer, and then open the file again. If the red x still appears, you may have to delete the image and then insert it again. The image cannot be displayed. Your computer may not have enough memory to open the image, or the image may have been corrupted. Restart your computer, and then open the file again. If the red x still appears, you may have to delete the image and then insert it again. The image cannot be displayed. Your computer may not have enough memory to open the image, or the image may have been corrupted. Restart your computer, and then open the file again. If the red x still appears, you may have to delete the image and then insert it again. The image cannot be displayed. Your computer may not have enough memory to open the image, or the image may have been corrupted. Restart your computer, and then open the file again. If the red x still appears, you may have to delete the image and then insert it again.

(12)

2.2

Governing Board

The institution has a governing board of at least five members that is the legal body with specific authority over the institution. The board is an active policy-making body for the institution and is ultimately responsible for ensuring that the financial resources of the institution are adequate to provide a sound educational program. The board is not controlled by a minority of board members or by organizations or interests separate from it. Both the presiding officer of the board and a majority of other voting members of the board are free of any contractual, employment, or personal or familial financial interest in the institution. A military institution authorized and operated by the federal government to award degrees has a public board on which both the presiding officer and a majority of the other members are neither civilian employees of the military nor active/retired military. The board has broad and significant influence upon the institution's programs and operations, plays an active role in policy-making, and ensures that the financial resources of the institution are used to provide a sound educational program. The board is not controlled by a minority of board members or by organizations or interests separate from the board except as specified by the authorizing legislation. Both the presiding officer of the board and a majority of other voting board members are free of any contractual, employment, or personal or familial financial interest in the institution.

Judgment

Compliant Non-Compliant Not Applicable

Narrative

The State Board of Technical and Adult Education (State Board) is Southwest Georgia Technical College's (SWGTC) governing board and is responsible for establishing standards, regulations, and policies for the operation of Georgia's technical colleges. The State Board consists of a member from each of Georgia's 13 Congressional districts as well as eight members at large. A Roster of State Board Members, located on the Technical College System of Georgia (TCSG) Web site, includes each member's picture, contact information, and biography. The State Board Bylaws provide information on the Board's membership, officers and their duties, meetings, and operation.

The State Board is an active policy-making body, as demonstrated in the May 6,

(13)

State Board Responsibilities and Authority provides a list of board responsibilities and a list of tasks the board must consider and act upon.

The State Board is responsible for ensuring that the financial resources of all TCSG

institutions, including SWGTC, are adequate to provide a sound educational program. The Official Code of Georgia Annotated (OCGA) § 20-4-11, Section 11, indicates that the State Board shall:

Submit an annual request for funding to the Office of Planning and Budget as prescribed in Code Sections 45-12-78 and 45-12-79. Such submission shall reflect a request for funds pursuant to an enrollment driven formula that reflects funds for direct instructional costs to include salaries and instructional supplies and equipment, funds for indirect support,

maintenance and operation, staff and professional development, and media services.

The board is not controlled by a minority of board members or by organizations or interests separate from it, as evident in the November 5, 2009, State Board Minutes. The State Board Bylaws, Article III, Meetings of the Board, Section 6, Quorum, explicitly states:

At all meetings of the Board, a majority of the members appointed shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business. The action of a majority of the members of the Board present at any meeting shall be the action of the Board, except as may be otherwise provided by these bylaws.

Both the presiding officer of the board and a majority of other voting members of the board are free of any contractual, employment, or personal or familial financial interest in the institution, as demonstrated in State Board Members' Biographies. Additionally, State Board Members' Biographies indicate that no Board member has such an association with SWGTC.

SWGTC is not a military institution.

Sources

I.C.1. State Board Responsibilities and AuthorityMay 6, 2010 State Board Minutes

November 5, 2009 State Board MinutesO.C.G.A. § 20-4-11 (11)

Roster of State Board MembersState Board Bylaws (III.6)

(14)

2.3

Chief Executive Officer

The institution has a chief executive officer whose primary responsibility is to the institution and who is not the presiding officer of the board.

Judgment

Compliant Non-Compliant Not Applicable

Narrative

Southwest Georgia Technical College (SWGTC) has a chief executive officer, Dr. Craig Wentworth, hired by the Commissioner of the Technical College System of Georgia (TCSG) on November 1, 2010, as outlined in the President's Employment Letter. The President has the authority to operate and manage the College, as stated in State Board policy I. F. 2. Responsibilities and Authority of Technical College Presidents:

The President of each Technical College shall be the Chief Executive Officer of the college and all its departments, and shall exercise supervision and direction and promote the

efficient operation of the college. The President shall be responsible to the Commissioner for the operation and management of the college and for the execution of all directives of the State Board and the Commissioner.

Additionally, more specific responsibilities of the College’s chief executive officer are in State Board Procedure: Presidential Responsibilities and in the President's Job

Description.

The chief executive officer of SWGTC is neither a member of nor the presiding officer of the State Board. The State Board Procedure: State Board Bylaws outlines Board membership and terms of appointment in the Official Code of Georgia Annotated § 20-4-10. The TCSG Web site provides a complete Roster of State Board Members.

Sources

I.F.2. Responsibilities and Authority of Technical College PresidentsO.C.G.A. § 20-4-10

President's Employment LetterPresident's Job Description

(15)

Procedure: State Board Bylaws (Section 2)Roster of State Board Members

(16)

2.4

Institutional Mission

The institution has a clearly defined, comprehensive, and published mission statement that is specific to the institution and appropriate for higher education. The mission addresses teaching and learning and, where applicable, research and public service.

Judgment

Compliant Non-Compliant Not Applicable

Narrative

Southwest Georgia Technical College (SWGTC) has a clearly defined, comprehensive, and published Mission Statement. It is specific to the College and appropriate for higher

education. It also addresses teaching and learning, and public service. The College does not have a research mission. The College's current Mission Statement follows:

Southwest Georgia Technical College, a unit of the Technical College System of Georgia, is a public two-year technical college with the mission to provide learner-centered and high-quality services, courses, and programs through traditional and distance delivery methods, at both on-campus and off-campus locations, serving primarily the citizens of Thomas, Grady, and Mitchell Counties. This mission is accomplished through college-wide services; credit courses leading to associate degree, diploma, and technical certificate of credit programs; adult education services; continuing education; customized business and organizational training; and economic development services. These services, courses, and programs develop individual skills and abilities; provide for intellectual, career, personal, and professional development; and meet the needs of business and industry. Achievement of this mission promotes economic growth and development and improves the quality of life for individuals and the community.

The SWGTC Mission Statement is clearly defined and identifiable. Where published, it has a headline, “Mission” or "Mission Statement,” so the reader quickly identifies and easily locates it. The Mission Statement clearly defines the College by including language specific to scope:

WHO we are . . .

Southwest Georgia Technical College, a unit of the Technical College System of Georgia

WHAT we are . . .

(17)

WHAT we do . . .

provide services, courses, and programs • WHAT is our focus . . .

learner-centered and high-quality • HOW we deliver . . .

through traditional and distance delivery methods • WHERE we deliver . . .

both on-campus and off-campus locations • WHO we serve . . .

primarily the citizens of Thomas, Grady, and Mitchell Counties • HOW we accomplish . . .

through college-wide services; credit courses leading to associate degree, diploma, and technical certificate of credit programs; adult education services; continuing education; customized business and organizational training; and economic development services

WHAT are the goals . . .

develop individual skills and abilities; provide for intellectual, career, personal, and professional development; and meet the needs of business and industry

WHAT is the outcome . . .

promote economic growth and development and improve the quality of life for individuals and the community

The Mission Statement is comprehensive, as demonstrated by language specific to the College's role as follows:

It defines the College status as a public institution.

It defines the College level as a two-year institution.

It defines the College type as a technical college.

It addresses the scope of the College's business as providing services, courses, and programs.

It informs the reader that the College uses two delivery methods for services, courses, and programs to include both traditional and distance.

It states that the College offers services, courses, and programs at both on-campus and off-on-campus locations.

It specifically identifies the primary counties that the College serves as Thomas, Grady, and Mitchell Counties.

It describes how the College, through all units and programs, accomplishes its mission through college-wide services; credit courses leading to associate degree, diploma, and technical certificate programs; adult education services;

continuing education; customized business and organizational training; and economic development services.

(18)

It states that its goals are to develop individual skills and abilities; provide for intellectual, career, personal, and professional development; and meet the needs of business and industry.

Additionally, the Mission Statement is comprehensive as it includes key words and/or

phrases that the College's programs and administrative units use to derive specific functions and purpose statements; for example, administrative units include, but are not limited to, the Administrative Services/Vice President, Facilities, Academic Affairs/Vice President, Admissions, Recruitment, Career Placement and Development, Counseling Services, Tutoring Center, Financial Aid, High School Coordination, Registrar/Student Records,

Library/Media Services, Distance Education, and Economic Development/Vice President. Unit purpose statements are published in documents such as Annual Plans and Budgets

and Outcome Assessments.

The current Mission Statement, as approved by the State Board on April 1, 2010, is published consistently in College publications and on the SWGTC Web site. The College publishes the mission in the 2010-2011 SWGTC Catalog and Student Handbook, p. 9, and maintains it on the College’s Web site under “About SWGTC.” Other publications, such as the SWGTC Institutional Documents, p. 2; the SWGTC Strategic Plan FY 2008-FY 2012: FY 2011 Update, p. 4; and the SWGTC Personnel Handbook, p. 7, also include the Mission Statement, further demonstrating that the College consistently publishes it in appropriate publications.

The Mission Statement is specific to the institution, which is demonstrated as follows: • It includes the specific name of the College as Southwest Georgia Technical

College.

It identifies primary service areas specific to the College as Thomas, Grady, and Mitchell Counties.

The Mission Statement is appropriate for higher education, which is demonstrated as follows:

It specifically states that SWGTC is a two-year technical college.

It specifically states that the mission is accomplished through services and credit courses leading to awards that are appropriate for higher education institutions by including the following as part of the Mission Statement: "This mission is accomplished through college-wide services; credit courses leading to associate degrees, diplomas, and technical certificates of credit programs." • Additionally, all statements in the mission are appropriate for a higher

(19)

The Mission Statement addresses teaching and learning by including language as follows: • It states that the focus is learner-centered.

It speaks to offering instruction in credit courses leading to associate degree, diploma, and technical certificate of credit programs; adult education services;

continuing education; customized business and organizational training; and economic development services.

It informs the reader that the College uses both traditional and distance delivery methods for providing services, courses, and programs.

It states that the College offers services, courses, and programs at both on-campus and off-on-campus locations.

It states that the goals are to develop individual skills and abilities; provide for intellectual, career, personal, and professional development; and meet the needs of business and industry.

SWGTC's mission does not include research; however, the Mission Statement addresses the role of the College in public service by including language specific to the function of the SWGTC Economic Development Department as follows:

It addresses commitment to public service by stating that the College offers education, training, and services through continuing education; customized business and organizational training; and economic development services. Off-Campus Sites

The SWGTC Mission Statement includes language recognizing the College's intent to make services, courses, and programs available at off-campus locations. An excerpt of the current SWGTC Mission Statement relevant to off-campus locations follows:

Southwest Georgia Technical College, a unit of the Technical College System of Georgia, is a public two-year technical college with the mission to provide learner-centered and high-quality services, courses, and programs through traditional and distance delivery methods,

at both on-campus and off-campus locations, serving primarily the citizens of Thomas,

(20)

Distance Education

The SWGTC Mission Statement includes language recognizing the College's intent to make services, courses, and programs available through distance education. An excerpt of the current SWGTC Mission Statement relevant to distance education follows:

Southwest Georgia Technical College, a unit of the Technical College System of Georgia, is a public two-year technical college with the mission to provide learner-centered and

high-quality services, courses, and programs through traditional and distance delivery

methods, at both on-campus and off-campus locations, serving primarily the citizens of Thomas, Grady, and Mitchell Counties.

Sources

2010-2011 SWGTC Catalog and Student Handbook (Page 10)About SWGTC

Southwest Georgia Technical College Institutional Documents (Page 2)Southwest Georgia Technical College Strategic Plan FY 2008-FY 2012: FY

2011 Update (Page 4)

(21)
(22)

2.5

Institutional Effectiveness

The institution engages in ongoing, integrated, and institution-wide research-based planning and evaluation processes that (1) incorporate a systematic review of institutional mission, goals, and outcomes; (2) result in continuing improvement in institutional quality; and (3) demonstrate the institution is effectively accomplishing its mission.

Judgment

Compliant Non-Compliant Not Applicable

Narrative

Overview

Southwest Georgia Technical College (SWGTC) engages in ongoing, integrated, and institution-wide research-based planning and evaluation processes that (1) incorporate a systematic review of institutional mission, goals, and outcomes; (2) result in continuing improvement in institutional quality; and (3) demonstrate the institution is effectively accomplishing its mission. Ultimately, SWGTC defines Institutional Effectiveness (IE) as the positive correlation of results to expectations. The SWGTC Institutional Effectiveness (IE) system, as described in the SWGTC Institutional Effectiveness Model (IE Model), integrates specific research, data collection, evaluation, analysis, assessment, planning, budgeting, and implementing processes within all units and programs of the College. The IE Model provides a system for the College to continuously improve programs, services, and student learning and to demonstrate the progress of the College in fulfilling its stated mission.

Ongoing Planning and Evaluation Processes

Although the College has had a published IE Model since 1987, as reflected in the SWGTC Institutional Self-Study Report 2002, Section III, p. III-1, the College's IE Model, processes, and products have evolved and improved over the years. The President provides leadership, while the IE Office, the IE Committee, and the President’s Leadership Council (PLC) facilitate the IE processes, as indicated in the SWGTC Institutional Effectiveness Policy. This policy ensures that the College uses the IE Model in implementing the ongoing Continuous Improvement Process (CIP), steps taken to ensure quality programs and

(23)

SWGTC IE Model has established components that enable the College to implement its Continuous Improvement Process. These components represent processes for research, evaluation, assessment, and planning, as detailed in the SWGTC Institutional

Effectiveness Model, and include the following:

• Technical College System of Georgia (TCSG) Mission • Annual Review of SWGTC Mission and Role and Scope • 5-Year Strategic Plan

• End-of-Year Assessment of the Strategic Plan

• Annual Update of the Strategic Plan (New Initiatives) • Master Facility Plan

• Information Technology Plan • Review of TCSG Standards

• TCSG Performance Accountability System (PAS) • Perkins Plan

• 3-6 Year TCSG Performance Accountability Review (PAR) • Customer Evaluations (Internal and External)

• Annual Faculty and Staff Personnel Evaluations • Research and Data

(24)

• Assessment of Expected Outcomes and Document Improvements (Units/Programs/Student Learning Outcomes)

• Annual Plans and Budgets • Staff Development Plans

• End-of-Year Assessment of Annual Plans and Budgets and Staff Development Plans The College has a long history of strategic planning and documenting results. An early plan, the Thomas Technical Institute 1994 Strategic Plan, was carried out in FY

1995-FY 1999, and a subsequent plan, the SWGTC Strategic Plan FY 2001-2011, was closed out in FY 2007. It was replaced in FY 2008 with a new strategic plan, recently updated and published as the SWGTC Strategic Plan FY 2008-FY 2012: FY 2011 Update. Over the years, College personnel has consistently executed plans and annually documented strategic plan accomplishments. The old documentation process involved document production, which made production of year-end results timely; but the current process allows members of the PLC, on behalf of all College personnel, to evaluate and document accomplishments in an Excel workbook, created with College goal worksheets, and maintained on the College's shared drive. The most recent year-end evaluation document is the SWGTC Strategic Plan Implementation-FY 2008-FY 2012: Includes FY 2008-FY 2010 Evaluations and FY 2011 Plan.

In the early years, FY 1998 through FY 2008, unit annual plans and budgets were created, and the results were documented at mid-year and year-end in word processing software. Since FY 2009, faculty and staff have used a Cold Fusion application, with anytime-anywhere access, to complete unit annual plans and budgets. In older annual planning documents, users manually entered the strategic planning and College goal references; however, with APPLES, the new annual planning and budgeting tool, users select these from drop down menus. Thus, the new tool makes completing the evaluation processes for unit plans and budgets easy.

Realizing that it would be difficult to document compliance with SACS: COC 3.3.1.1-.5 (excluding .4) through only the strategic planning and annual planning and budgeting documents, the College, in FY 2005, designed and implemented outcome assessment templates for all units of the College. While administrative units assess unique expected outcomes, included in the assessment tools, the technical programs assess a standard "set" of program expected outcomes and unique program student learning outcomes (SLOs). In FY 2006 and FY 2007, data were collected and reported for specified SLOs in the templates, and comparison to prior-year results was reported in FY 2007 and FY 2008. As the College implemented curriculum changes and as reporting expectations changed to include

traditional and online instruction results, as well as on-campus and off-campus instruction results, program SLOs continued to improved annually. The College maintains archives of

(25)

completed plans, research, evaluations, data reports, and outcome assessments. Many of these recent documents are included in this Core Requirement section, and others are included in Comprehensive Standard 3.3.1.

A calendar, published in the SWGTC Institutional Effectiveness Model, p. 10,

demonstrates that College planning and evaluation processes are ongoing. The calendar provides organization to ensure that research-based planning and evaluation, and other processes included in the IE Model, are ongoing. The calendar lists activities associated with 5-year, 3-year, and 1-year research-based planning and evaluation and other processes. Also, the calendar identifies the month (s) that 1-year activities occur. The College also includes a narrative of its timeline in its SWGTC Institutional

Effectiveness Procedure, further evidence that the College has ongoing processes and activities.

Integrated Planning and Evaluation Processes

The IE Model components include integrated research, evaluation, assessment, and

planning and budgeting processes. Beginning with the establishment of the SWGTC Mission Statement and its annual review to assure currency, the SWGTC Mission Statement provides the basis for the SWGTC Vision, Values, Philosophy, College Goals, and Role and Scope as well as for strategic planning, outcome assessment, and annual planning and budgeting. Strategic planning occurs with input from many IE Model components, but notably the SWGTC Master Facility Plan and the SWGTC Information Technology Plan. Updates occur annually to the SWGTC Strategic Plan as new initiatives are added as strategic objectives. The SWGTC Strategic Plan College Goals and Strategic Objectives are evaluated/assessed at each end-of-year, with evaluation/assessment results impacting updates to the SWGTC Strategic Plan. Data, research, assessment, and evaluation results are available and utilized to determine the extent to which the SWGTC Mission, College Goals, Strategic Objectives, and Expected Outcomes are achieved. Annual plans and

budgets and staff development plans are formed based on results, expectations, needs, and strategic plan objectives. The SWGTC Budget Committee considers budget requests for administrative units and program units, as included in annual plans and budgets, and funds are allocated according to funding recommendations. Improvements in the College, units, and programs are recorded in Outcome Assessments; in Strategic Plan accomplishments, and in Annual Plan Goals, Objectives, and Activities accomplishments. An illustration of the integration of the IE Model components follows:

(26)
(27)

Institution-wide Planning and Evaluation Processes

All College departments, programs, units, and personnel participate in planning, budgeting, evaluation, and outcome assessment processes. The most current listing of departments, programs, units, and associated College personnel involved in these processes is the FY 2011 Planning & Budgeting, Evaluation, and Outcome Assessment Units. These processes not only provide for horizontal inclusiveness for the units of the College, but also provide for vertical inclusiveness from the president, to the vice presidents, to

deans/directors/ coordinators/specialists, to programs and offices, and to individual faculty and staff. The College has in place Local Measures; TCSG Performance Accountability System (PAS) Program and Institutional Measures; and College Performance Funding Measures and Benchmarks that are assigned to specific College units and programs during outcome assessment processes. These measures, benchmarks, and data sources are published in the SWGTC Institutional Measures: FY 2010 document. Several of the institutional measures are indirect measures and results are assessed based upon survey results. The College publishes the measures and corresponding survey questions in the SWGTC FY 2010 Evaluations, Surveys, Benchmarks document.

Research Based Planning and Evaluation Processes

SWGTC conducts research, gathers data, and completes evaluations, which are analyzed and used as sources during evaluation and planning processes. During the evaluation phase, faculty and staff evaluate expected outcomes (Unit, Program, and SLOs) using research, data, and evaluations to determine the extent to which established expected outcomes are achieved as included in unit and program outcome assessment templates and as included in program SLO assessment templates. Also, supervisors complete faculty and staff evaluations to determine the extent to which they meet performance criteria

expectations. Then, during the planning phase, faculty and staff consider assessment results to create unit annual plans and budgets that include improvements plans for expected outcomes not met or for improvements and/or resources needed/desired. Additionally, faculty and staff use completed personnel evaluations as they create staff development plans for the upcoming year. Steps 1-5 of the Continuous Improvement Process illustrate these processes. The following sections describe how SWGTC conducts customer and personnel evaluations, conducts research, and compiles data on an ongoing basis for use in planning and evaluation processes. The following sections also include specific examples of how the College uses customer evaluations, personnel evaluations, research, and data in evaluation and planning.

(28)

Customer Evaluations

Internal and external customers complete evaluations/surveys of departments, programs, and the College overall. The College uses the customer survey results on an on-going basis as indirect assessments, but especially reviews and uses

them during the evaluation and planning phases as expected Outcome Assessments (units and programs) are completed and as Annual Plans and Budgets and the

College’s Strategic Plan are prepared. Findings are also used during the evaluation of individuals, programs, functional units, and the College. Student Affairs, Economic Development, Adult Education, Distance Education (formerly Georgia Virtual

Technical College, and the Institutional Effectiveness units are responsible for these evaluations. The Institutional Research Coordinator is responsible for administering most evaluations, for compiling most evaluation results, and for writing results reports. Customer evaluation findings are continuously reviewed and action is taken as needed. Examples of evaluations/surveys administered regularly include New Student Orientation Survey, Student Evaluations of Instructors/Instruction, Student Evaluations of Clinical Instructors/Coordinators/Instruction, Online Course Evaluation (used through spring 2010), Online Course Evaluation (used beginning Fall 2010), Adult Education Instructor/Class Evaluation, Economic Development Course Evaluation Survey, Student Satisfaction Survey, High School Student-Sites Student Satisfaction Survey, Off-Campus Sites Student Satisfaction Survey, Colleague Satisfaction Survey, Graduate Exit Survey, Graduate Follow-Up Survey, and the Employer Follow-Up Survey.

SWGTC maintains PDF documents of evaluations/surveys and results reports on a shared drive that all members of the faculty and staff can access. Additionally, these documents are linked to the College Intranet for easy access by the internal College community. Since FY 2001, the College has archived reports in PDF format. The most recent three years of results reports for customer evaluations are included below:

• New Student Orientation Survey Results: FY 2008, FY 2009, and FY 2010; • Student Evaluations of Instructors/Instruction-Overall Results: FY 2008, FY 2009,

and FY 2010;

• Online Course Evaluation-Overall Results: FY 2008, FY 2009, and FY 2010;

• Adult Education Instructor/Class Evaluation-Overall Results: FY 2008, FY 2009, and FY 2010;

• Economic Development Course Evaluation Survey-Overall Results: FY 2008, FY 2009, and FY 2010;

(29)

• High School Site Student Satisfaction Survey Results: FY 2008 and FY 2009 (Survey Results Report changed for FY 2010);

• High School Student and Sites & Off-Campus Sites Student Satisfaction Survey Results: FY 2010;

• Colleague Satisfaction Survey Results: FY 2008, FY 2009, and FY 2010; • Graduate Exit Survey Results: FY 2008, FY 2009, and FY 2010;

• Graduate Follow-Up Survey Results: FY 2007, FY 2008, and FY 2009 (FY 2010 results available Spring 2011); and

• Employer Follow-Up Survey Results: FY 2007, FY 2008, and FY 2009 (FY 2010 results available Spring 2011).

*The College does not archive individual evaluation results, only overall results.

Table 2.5-1 shows an example of how the Vice President for Academic Affairs used the results from a customer evaluation, the Colleague Satisfaction Survey, to evaluate an

expected outcome included in the Academic Affairs' Unit Outcome Assessment. The example provided is one where the expected outcome was not met, and, therefore, subsequent activities were included in the Academic Affairs/Vice President's Annual Plan and Budget. This example illustrates that SWGTC has research-based planning and evaluation processes in place.

(30)

Table 2.5-1

Example of Results of Customer Evaluation Used in Evaluation and Planning Processes

Unit Name Expected Outcome Number Expected Outcome

Data Source Met/Not Met FY 2011 Action Plan Assessment Results FY 2009 Academic Affairs/VP AAVP-2 (FY 09) AAVP-3 (FY 10) LM III-2 For FY 2010 Colleague Satisfaction Survey 80% of faculty indicate satisfaction with equipment and instructional technology in support of instruction. DOCUMENT REFERENCE/DATA SOURCE: FY 2009 and FY 2010 Assessment Colleague Satisfaction Survey ?’s 29-30 (reported by VP-AA - ONLY Faculty Responses) Not Met Question 30 78.6% of faculty indicate satisfaction that instructional equipment in shops/labs is adequate to meet the current technological needs of the program. LINK

Annual Faculty and Staff Personnel Evaluations

Prior to May 31, supervisors annually evaluate each SWGTC faculty and staff member. Examples of personnel evaluations regularly used in this process include Administrator Performance Evaluation, Building Maintenance Staff & Grounds Maintenance Staff Evaluation, Faculty Performance Evaluation, Adjunct Faculty Evaluation, Adjunct Online Faculty Evaluation, and Support Staff Evaluation. During the evaluation, as relevant to the individual,

supervisors review the previous individual staff development plan, the department and/or individual annual plan, and, if appropriate, customer evaluations, as well as other evaluation and/or outcomes assessment findings. The Human Resources Coordinator maintains personnel evaluations in personnel files. Based on these evaluations, faculty and staff design staff development activities and plans for the upcoming year.

(31)

Table 2.5-2 provides examples of how two faculty members used the results of personnel evaluations to create corresponding staff development activities in their staff development plans for the upcoming year. These examples illustrate that SWGTC has research-based planning and evaluation processes in place.

Table 2.5-2

Example of Results of Personnel Evaluation Used in Planning Processes

Personnel Evaluation Staff Development Plan SWGTC Faculty 1 Performance

Evaluation: FY 2010 SWGTC Faculty 1 Staff Development Plan: FY 2011 SWGTC Faculty 2 Performance

Evaluation: FY 2010 SWGTC Faculty 2 Staff Development Plan: FY 2011

Research and Data

To support the assessment of unit and program expected outcomes and SLOs by programs, SWGTC conducts research, then collects and compiles data for units and programs to use, as needed. The College uses research and data reports on an ongoing basis as direct assessments, but especially reviews and uses these

reports during the evaluation and planning phases as Outcome Assessments (units and programs) for measures are completed and as Annual Plans and Budgets and the College's Strategic Plan are prepared. Units and programs use research and data reports, as needed, as data sources in the Outcomes Assessments (OA) and in the Student Learning Outcomes Assessment (SLOA) templates in order to complete the formal outcomes assessment processes. The Institutional Research (IR)

Coordinator compiles Local Program Data Reports and Course Completion and Pass Rate Analysis-All Courses. The IR Coordinator also posts these, the PAS Trend Reports, and the SWGTC Performance Funding Measure Results on the College shared drive for use by all faculty and staff. Additionally, these are linked to the College Intranet for easy access by the internal College community. In 2002, the College began archiving reports in PDF format (except for the SWGTC Performance Funding Measure Results report, which first became available in FY 2008).

Research and data reports are continuously reviewed, and action is taken as needed. Four examples of SWGTC research and data reports used by units and programs include: Local Program Data Reports: FY 2008, FY 2009, and FY 2010; PAS Trend Reports: FY 2006-FY 2008, FY 2007-FY 2009, FY 2008-FY 2010; Course Completion and

(32)

Pass Rate Analysis-All Courses: FY 2008, FY 2009, and FY 2010; and SWGTC

Performance Funding Measure Results: FY 2008, FY 2009, and FY 2010. For reader convenience, the FY 2008, FY 2009, and FY 2010 results for the SWGTC Performance Funding Measures are included in one report.

Table 2.5-3 demonstrates how the Associate Degree Nursing faculty used the results from the PAS Trend Report to evaluate an expected outcome included in the Associate Degree Nursing's Unit Outcome Assessment. The example provided is one where the expected outcome was not met, and, therefore, subsequent activities were included in the Associate Degree Nursing Annual Plan and Budget. This example illustrates that SWGTC has research based planning and evaluation processes in place.

Table 2.5-3

Example of Results of Data

Used in Evaluation and Planning Processes Unit Name Expected Outcome Number Expected Outcome

Data Source Met/Not Met FY 2011 Action Plan Assessment Results FY 2009 Associate Degree Nursing ADN-12 PAS CP-1 12 FTEs or more are recorded for each full-time instructor for the program group for the reporting year enrollment.

DOCUMENT

REFERENCE/DATA SOURCE: Program Data Report PAS Measures-3-Year Report:

[FTE/Instructor for the Data Year]

Not Met

11.13 FTE’s per instructor were recorded for each full time instructor for the program group for the reporting year enrollment. (FY 2009) 52.40 Generic 14.38 LPN Bridge LINK

(33)

Incorporate a Systematic Review of Institutional Mission, Goals, and Outcomes The IE Model employs a system that provides for a systematic review of the institutional mission, goals, and outcomes. It ensures that expected unit and program outcomes and program SLOs are identified and assessed; that results are used for improvement in

planning and budgeting; that plans are implemented and evaluated; and that improvements are documented. The College completes an annual review of the College Mission Statement and Role and Scope. The College also completes a periodic review of the College Vision, Values, Philosophy, and Goals to be updated during the strategic planning preparation process. A new strategic plan is developed every five years. Annually, the PLC leads the assessment of the Five-Year Strategic Plan: College Goals and Strategic Objectives and records fiscal year accomplishments. Annually, faculty and administrative staff complete the Technical College System of Georgia Performance Accountability System (PAS): Evaluation, Plan, and Budget process whereby expectations are assessed and improvements planned. Annually, unit and program assessments of established expected outcomes and SLOs are completed and improvements documented. Annually, faculty and staff develop new annual plans and budgets and staff development plans based on the following: (1) results of prior year Annual Plans and evaluations, (2) research and data, and (3) future plans. Mid-year and annually, faculty and staff complete the goals, objectives, and activities assessment included in unit annual plans and budgets and individual staff development plans.

Annual Review: Mission and Role and Scope

The College conducts an annual review of the College's Mission Statement and of the College’s Role and Scope. The Institutional Effectiveness Office, with assistance from the Institutional Effectiveness (IE) Committee, is responsible for coordinating the annual review of the College’s Mission Statement by faculty and staff, Student Council members, and program advisory committee members. Input is secured from individuals and groups via a survey, the Mission Statement Evaluation. Faculty and staff complete the evaluation online; and Student Council members and program advisory committee members provide input through group discussion. The

Institutional Effectiveness (IE) Committee summarizes, considers input, and makes suggestions regarding the dispensation of input to the PLC. The PLC then considers IE Committee input and approves revisions (if any) to be forwarded to the local Board of Directors. The local Board of Directors then reviews the College Mission Statement and the PLC recommendations before deciding either to maintain the Mission Statement as is, or to approve changes. Should the local Board of Directors approve changes to the College Mission, the revised Mission Statement is forwarded to the State Board of Technical and Adult Education for approval.

(34)

During the FY 2010 review, significant changes were suggested and made to the College Mission Statement that had remained unchanged since April 5, 2007. Suggestions resulted from input received from several sources as follows:

• from the results of the Mission Statement Evaluation: FY 2010, as reported in the Mission Statement Evaluation Results: FY 2010, and summarized in the Summary of FY 2010 Mission Statement Evaluation Results: January 2010;

• from the Institutional Effectiveness Committee, as indicated in Institutional Effectiveness Committee Minutes: January 14, 2010, and Institutional Effectiveness Committee Minutes: February 16, 2010;

• from the PLC, as indicated in President's Leadership Council Minutes: February 9, 2010, and President's Leadership Council Minutes: February 23, 2010; and

• from the local Board of Directors, as indicated in Board of Directors' Meeting Minutes: March 2, 2010.

A request for change in the SWGTC Mission Statement was forwarded to the State Board on March 3, 2010, as indicated in the SWGTC Letter to State Board to Approve Mission Statement: March 3, 2010. The State Board approved the College's request at its meeting held on April 1, 2010, as indicated in the State Board Minutes: April 1, 2010. Several changes made in the SWGTC Mission Statement ensures that it included language specific to SWGTC. A reference was added indicating that the College serves primarily the citizens of Thomas, Grady, and Mitchell Counties. Language was added more specifically communicating the

services, programs, and award levels offered by the College. Also, included was a reference to off-campus locations.

Evidence that the SWGTC Mission Statement is reviewed annually is found in additional documentation. The SWGTC Mission Statement Evaluation Results for FY 2008 and FY 2009 are included in exhibits as are Institutional Effectiveness Committee Minutes for February 12, 2008 and February 17, 2009, President's Leadership Council Minutes for February 26, 2008 and February 24, 2009, and local Board of Directors' Minutes for March 4, 2008 and March 3, 2009.

Table 2.5-4 provides a summary of Mission Statement Evaluation Results for FY 2008, FY 2009, and FY 2010. Also included is a summary of actions taken by stakeholder groups and links to minutes. These results illustrate that a systematic review of the institutional Mission Statement occurred.

(35)

Table 2.5-4

Systematic Review of Institutional Mission Summary Task/Outcome FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 Campus-wide Mission Statement Evaluation Results

LINK LINK LINK

ACTIONS TAKEN BY:

Institutional Effectiveness Committee No changes recommended to President’s Leadership Council No changes recommended to President’s Leadership Council Changes recommended to President’s Leadership Council • Add language specific to SWGTC to include the county names that are included in the SWGTC service area; • Add language to more specifically communicate the services, programs, and award levels offered by the College; and • Added reference to off-campus locations. Meeting Date: 02-12-2008 Meeting Date: 02-17-2009 Meeting Date: 02-16-2010

(36)

Task/Outcome FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 President’s Leadership Council No changes recommended to Local Board of Directors No changes recommended to Local Board of Directors Changes recommended to Local Board of Directors: • Add language specific to SWGTC to include the county names that are included in the SWGTC service area; • Add language to more specifically communicate the services, programs, and award levels offered by the College; and • Added reference to off-campus locations. Meeting Date: 02-26-2008 Meeting Date: 02-24-2009 Meeting Date: 02-23-2010 Local Board of Directors No changes recommended No changes recommended Changes recommended to State Board: • Add language specific to SWGTC to include the county names that are included in the SWGTC service area; • Add language to more specifically communicate the services, programs, and award levels offered by the College; and

(37)

Task/Outcome FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 • Added reference to off-campus locations. Meeting Date: 03-04-2008 Meeting Date: 03-03-2009 Meeting Date: 03-02-2010 State Board All recommended

changes were approved.

Meeting Date:

04-01-2010

The PLC annually reviews the College’s Role and Scope. It is updated if changes in role or scope are indicated in programs or services. The PLC reviewed the Role and Scope most recently at its meeting on April 27, 2010. The President's Leadership Council Minutes: April 27, 2010, reflects that minor updates were made in the High School and Library/Media Services sections. The Role and Scope is published in the SWGTC Institutional Documents, pp. 5-6.

Periodic Review: College Vision, Values, Philosophy, and Goals Faculty and staff conduct a periodic review of the College's Vision, Values,

Philosophy, and Goals. The review precedes the preparation of a new strategic plan. The last review and update occurred in FY 2007 as the College conducted research and activities to prepare and implement a new strategic plan in FY 2008.

Five-Year Strategic Plan

The SWGTC faculty, staff, and local Board of Directors develop a comprehensive five-year strategic plan. Input is also gathered from the College’s students, program advisory

committee members, and from the community through the completion of the Business and Industry Training Needs Survey. This plan is prepared as follows: (1) Compile an in-depth environmental scan that formally examines external and internal environments in relation to the College’s Mission, Vision, Values, Philosophy, Goals, and Role and Scope; (2) conduct a formal SWOT process that gathers observations and predictions from participating

individuals to enable the College to take advantage of strengths and opportunities, while minimizing College weaknesses and threats; (3) determine a desired vision of what the College will be in five years; (4) complete a gap analysis of desired vision and current status; (5) devise plan and budget; (6) establish a plan to assess accomplishments; and (7) implement plan. The strategic plan establishes College goals and strategic objectives

(38)

that include all functional areas of the College. The Institutional Effectiveness Office is responsible for facilitating the strategic plan development. The Strategic Planning Ad Hoc Committee is responsible for developing the strategic plan. The strategic plan currently in place is the SWGTC Strategic Plan FY 2008-FY 2012: FY 2011 Update.

End-of-Year Assessment of Strategic Plan: College Goals and Strategic Objectives

Annually, at the end of the year, stakeholders complete an analysis to assess the College’s progress in accomplishing the College Goals and Strategic Objectives included in the College’s Strategic Plan. The progress and updates to strategic objectives and activities are documented annually in the Strategic Plan

Implementation document. The three completed assessments for the current Strategic Plan include the SWGTC Strategic Plan Implementation-FY 2008-FY 2012: Includes 2008-FY 2008 Evaluations and 2008-FY 2009 Plan, the SWGTC Strategic Plan Implementation-FY 2008-FY 2012: Includes FY 2008 and FY 2009 Evaluations and FY 2010 Plan, and the SWGTC Strategic Plan Implementation-FY 2008-FY 2012: Includes FY 2008-FY 2010 Evaluations and FY 2011 Plan. The Institutional Effectiveness Office coordinates this activity with PLC and other stakeholders.

Table 2.5-5 provides a list of the College's six goals and links to annual summary reports by stakeholders as they reviewed goals and recorded goal accomplishments for FY 2008, FY 2009, and FY 2010. This list illustrates that a systematic review of the institutional goals occurred.

(39)

Table 2.5-5

Systematic Review of College Goals Summary

College Goal Review Annual Results FY

2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 Goal 1:

Provide high-quality instructional courses and programs that serve the intellectual and career needs of individuals and the needs of business and industry.

LINK LINK LINK

Goal 2:

Provide advanced technology and infrastructure to

support teaching, learning, and administrative functions. LINK LINK LINK

Goal 3:

Provide comprehensive services and resources to promote student success.

LINK LINK LINK

Goal 4:

Provide quality training programs to serve the needs of individuals and to promote economic development of business and industry.

LINK LINK LINK

Goal 5:

Maintain an ongoing research-based system of assessment, planning, and budgeting to achieve expected outcomes.

LINK LINK LINK

Goal 6:

Develop mutually beneficial partnerships to secure contributions from business and industry, public-sector sources, private foundations, and individuals.

LINK LINK LINK

(40)

Annual Update of Strategic Plan

The PLC annually identifies new initiatives and recommends inclusion in the strategic plan as strategic objectives. The local Board of Directors approves adjustments to the strategic plan. The Institutional Effectiveness Office coordinates this activity. For FY 2011, PLC recommended to the local Board of Directors, the addition of Goal 1, 1.O, which is to expand and develop programs and offerings by beginning Health Information Technology, A.A.S., Diploma, and Health Information Coding Associate, TCC, programs. This initiative was approved by PLC as reflected in President's Leadership Council Minutes: March 30, 2010, and approved by the local Board of Directors as reflected in the Board of Directors' Minutes: April 5, 2010. This activity supports the College Goal 1, which is to "provide high-quality instructional courses and programs that serve the intellectual and career needs of individuals and the needs of business and industry." The new initiative is published in the document SWGTC Strategic Plan Implementation-FY FY 2012: Includes FY 2008-FY 2010 Evaluations and 2008-FY 2011 Plan, p. 4, in Goal 1, Objective 1.O.

TCSG Performance Accountability System: Evaluation, Plan, and Budget The Technical College System of Georgia's (TCSG) institutional effectiveness process, the Performance Accountability System (PAS), is a process designed to promote quality and excellence in technical education and training. It is based on the premise that effectiveness is not simply a measurement process; rather, it is fundamentally grounded in the belief that organizations cannot improve unless they can evaluate their current performance against established benchmarks and use the results of these evaluations as the basis for future planning. The PAS system contains the following: (1) Program Assessment; (2) College-wide Assessment; (3) Budgeting; and (4) Improvement Planning. This process annually measures performance on a prescribed set of college-wide and program measures. These include (1) compliance with the TCSG standards’ measures (designated as CS) and (2) compliance with performance measures (designated as CP) according to established benchmarks. College performance on CP measures are reported in reports forwarded to the College by TCSG. The PAS FY 2006-2008 Trend Report, the PAS FY 2007-2009 Trend Report, and the PAS FY 2008-2010 Trend Report demonstrate the status of the College's program groups in meeting TCSG enrollment, award, and placement expectations for three years for the data year and for a three-year trend.

Additionally, plans for continuous quality improvement in programs and the College, needed Minor Repair and Renovation (MRR) for facilities, and corresponding fiscal resources are included in the submission. PAS plans are completed for program

(41)

groupings not meeting PAS compliance and/or performance expectations. Level I Standard Corrective Action Plans and/or Performance Corrective Action Plans are prepared and submitted for program groups not meeting any standard and three or less performance measures. Any program group with four or more deficiencies in the six key performance measures will complete a Level II Program Group Performance Improvement Plan, which includes conducting and reporting on a Community Needs Assessment. PAS program groupings and the College overall evaluates and plans improvements for any unmet standards or measures. The programs, units, and College information is recorded within the Performance Accountability System Software (PASS).

During the budgeting phase, the TCSG PASS is used to prepare the College's budget request for state improvement funds projecting two fiscal years into the future. The College requests state funding for major renovation or repair (MRR); equipment needed for capital outlay construction projects, including capital outlay equipment, program equipment, and administrative equipment; and the College’s units and programs through items entered into TCSG PASS. The President submits the capital outlay construction requests to the TCSG, and they are included in the current Master Facility Plan.

College units and programs maintain improvement budget fund requests for specific items in APPLES PAS, a local Web-based application. Unit/Program heads on an ongoing basis are able to add items to APPLES PAS at any time as well as change the status of items to "delete" or "purchased." These items are entered into TCSG PASS from the local data base as the College submits its improvement budget needs for units and programs to TCSG.

SWGTC faculty and administrative staff participate in the PAS evaluation, planning, and budgeting process that is coordinated by the Institutional Effectiveness Office.

Outcomes Assessment and Document Improvements

Annually, each functional area (unit) and program grouping reviews its purpose statements relevant to the College Mission and assesses and records performance on established expected outcomes. In addition to unique unit and program measures, College-established local measures, and the TCSG: PAS measures are assessed according to established benchmarks. Also, programs measure performance of SLOs. Graduates' general education competencies are assessed. The results of outcome assessments are recorded in a local database. Completed outcome assessment

(42)

documents for units and programs are exhibited as SWGTC Outcome Assessment: FY 2007, SWGTC Outcome Assessment: FY 2008, and SWGTC Outcome

Assessment: FY 2009, and SWGTC Outcome Assessment: FY 2010. Plans for unmet expected outcomes, SLOs, and general education competencies, or those needing improvement, are recorded in the outcome assessment documents, then included in the unit or program annual plan and budget. Units and programs record improvements made from the prior year's assessment results and/or improvement actions taken.

Table 2.5-6 provides links to the College's Outcome Assessments completed annually by stakeholders for FY 2008, FY 2009, and FY 2010. This table illustrates that a systematic review of the institutional outcomes occurred. Comprehensive Standard Section 3.3.1 (.1 through .5 [minus .4]) provides additional documentation that outcomes are assessed.

Table 2.5-6

Systematic Review of College-wide Outcomes Summary (Three Most Recent Years)

College-wide Outcomes Review: Annual Results Links

FY 2008 LINK

FY 2009 LINK

FY 2010 LINK

Annual Plan and Budget

Each department, instructional program, and functional unit of the College develops an annual plan of work and budget. The most current unit listing of departments, programs, units, and associated College personnel for planning, budgeting, evaluation, and outcome assessment efforts is the FY 2011 SWGTC Outcome Assessment and Planning & Budgeting Units. The plan of work is based on the following: (1) outcomes assessment results from unit or program specific, local, and the TCSG: PAS measures and SLOs; (2) evaluation results of Perkins measures; (3) faculty/staff evaluations; (4) customer evaluations; (5) advisory committee input; (6) the previous annual plan; (7) COC Principles of Accreditation; (8) program specific licensure/accreditation/ certification standards and evaluations; (9) Strategic Plan College Goals and Strategic Objectives; and (10) results of other data and evaluations. The process involves every program, unit, and individual and includes evaluating, assessing, planning, budgeting, and implementing.

Figure

Table 2.5-3 demonstrates how the Associate Degree Nursing faculty used the results from  the PAS Trend Report to evaluate an expected outcome included in the Associate Degree  Nursing's Unit Outcome Assessment
Table 2.7.1-1: Associate of Applied Science Degree Programs
Table 2.7.2-1: Curriculum Comparisons
Table 2.7.3-1 provides a summary of the number of quarter credit hours required in each  A.A.S
+7

References

Related documents

Next, a series of chapters will cover cervical screening and the microscopic features of normal and abnormal cells found in cervical cytology samples, followed by the techniques

It is for these reasons that branch interest in economic development exploded into the early 1960s; federal officials embrace tonic; new employment creation and relocation

A este respecto, aunque es bien cierto que los microorganismos puede ser utilizados para la remediación de suelos contaminados con metales (principalmente, mediante inmovilización

The Ohio State Board of Cosmetology (hereafter referred to as “the Board”) is a unique regulatory board engaged in the governance of business, schools, and providers of branches

Director of Technical Education has prescribed the syllabus for the Advanced Diploma in Industrial Safety and the Maharashtra State Board of Technical Education hold the

Local emergency services, such as Boston Police, Boston Fire, Boston EMS, PWD, and others who have disaster response and related responsibilities will maintain and

In similar manner VKT for each vehicle type can be determined for the future years, Fuel consumption and fuel sale data can be obtained for each year and vehicle factor need to

This study draws on primary care reform interventions in Ontario, Canada as a natural experiment of P4P incentive payments to address the following questions: 1) Does P4P