• No results found

Generalized fractional integral operators and the multivariable H function

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Generalized fractional integral operators and the multivariable H function"

Copied!
17
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

R E S E A R C H

Open Access

Generalized fractional integral operators

and the multivariable

H

-function

Praveen Agarwal

1

, Sergei V Rogosin

2

, Erkinjon T Karimov

3*

and Mehar Chand

4

*Correspondence:

[email protected]

3Institute of Mathematics, National

University of Uzbekistan, Tashkent, 100125, Uzbekistan

Full list of author information is available at the end of the article

Abstract

The main object of the present paper is to establish new fractional integral formulas (of Marichev-Saigo-Maeda type) involving the products of the multivariable

H-functions and the first class of multivariable polynomials due to Srivastava and Garg. All the results derived here are of general character and can yield a number of (new and known) results in the theory of fractional calculus.

MSC: 26A33; 33C45; 33C60; 33C70; 33E12

Keywords: Marichev-Saigo-Maeda fractional integral operator; multivariable

H-function; first class of multivariable polynomials; Mittag-Leffler function

1 Introduction

Nowadays, fractional calculus is used as a mathematical tool for modeling the processes in engineering, mathematical economics, physics, chemistry, biology and other branches of science (see [–]). Motivated by the above mentioned works, here we aim to es-tablish two new fractional integral formulas (of Marichev-Saigo-Maeda type) involving the product of multivariableH-functions and the first class of multivariable polynomials Sm,...,ms

n (x, . . . ,xs). The so-called Marichev-Saigo-Maeda generalized fractional operators

were introduced nearly  years ago by Marichev [] and studied in some recent pa-pers, including the papers by Saigo and Maeda [] and by Saxena and Saigo []. Due to the usefulness and the importance of the Marichev-Saigo-Maeda fractional integral operators, many authors have presented a number of interesting integral formulas involv-ing special functions by usinvolv-ing the Marichev-Saigo-Maeda fractional integral operator (see [, –]). By virtue of the unified nature of Marichev-Saigo-Maeda fractional integral operators, a large number of new and known results involving Saigo, Riemann-Liouville and Erdélyi-Kober fractional integral operators follow as special cases of our main formu-las.

Our main results consist in application of the Marichev-Saigo-Maeda generalized frac-tional operators:

I,xα,α,β,β,ηf(x)

= x

α

(η)

x

(xt)η–tαF

α,α,β,β;η;  – t x,  –

x t

f(t)dt (Reη> ) (.)

(2)

and

Ix,∞α,α,β,β,ηf(x)

= x

α

(η)

x

(tx)η–tαF

α,α,β,β;η;  –x t,  –

t x

f(t)dt (Reη> ), (.)

to the multivariable H-functions (see,e.g., [, ]) and the first class of multivariable polynomialsSm,...,ms

n (x, . . . ,xs) given by (.).

A variant of such operators (integral transforms) was introduced by Marichev [] as Mellin type convolution operators with a special functionF(·) in the kernel. These

oper-ators were rediscovered and studied by Saigo in [] as a generalization of the so-called Saigo fractional integral operators, see []. The properties of these operators were studied by Saigo and Maeda []. In particular, relations of the operators with the Mellin trans-forms, hypergeometric operators (or Saigo fractional integral operators), their decompo-sitions and acting properties in the McBride spacesFp;μ(see []) were found.

In (.), (.) the symbolF(·) denotes the so-called rd Appell function (known also as

Horn function) (see [], p.):

F

α,α;β,β;η;x;y=

m,n=

(α)m(α)n(β)m(β)n

(η)m+nm!n!

xmyn max|x|,|y| < . (.)

The properties of this function are discussed in [], pp.-. In particular, its relation to the Gauss hypergeometric function is presented:

F(α,ηα;β,ηβ;η;x;y) =F(α,β;η;x+yxy).

It is known that the rd Appell function cannot be expressed as a product of twoF

func-tions and satisfy pairs of linear partial differential equafunc-tions of the second order.

Operators (.), (.) can be reduced to the fractional integral operators introduced by Saigo [] due to the following relations:

I,xα,,β,β,γf(x) = I,xγ,αγ,–βf(x) (γ ∈C) (.)

and

Ix,∞α,,β,β,γf(x) = Ix,∞γ,αγ,–βf(x) (γ ∈C). (.)

The multivariableH-function, introduced by Srivastava and Panda in a series of research papers (see [], p., Eq. (.), [], p., Eq. (.) and [, ]), can be defined and represented in the following manner (see,e.g., [], p., Eq. (C.)):a

H[x, . . . ,xr] =Hp,q:{p,n:{mr,qr,nr}r}

⎡ ⎢ ⎢ ⎣

x

.. . xr

(aj;αj(), . . . ,α (r)

j ),p:{(c(r)j ,γ (r) j ),pr}

(bj;βj(), . . . ,β (r)

j ),q:{(d(r)j ,δ (r) j ),qr}

⎤ ⎥ ⎥ ⎦

= 

(π ω)r

L · · ·

Lr

φ(ξ, . . . ,ξr) r

i=

θi(ξi)xξiidξi

(3)

where

φ(ξ, . . . ,ξr) =

n

j=( –aj+

r i=α

(i) j ξi)

p

j=n+(aj

r i=α

(i) j ξi)

q

j=( –bj+

r i=β

(i) j ξi)

, (.)

θi(ξi) =

ni

j=( –c (i) j +γ

(i) j ξi)

mi

j=(d (i) jδ

(i) j ξi)

pi

j=ni+(c

(i) jγ

(i) j ξi)

qi

j=mi+( –d

(i) j +δ

(i) j ξi)

, ∀i∈ {, , . . . ,r}. (.)

In these formulas, for anyi= , . . . ,r,Lirepresents the contours which start at the point τiω∞and goτi+ω∞withτi∈R= (–∞,∞) such that all the poles of(d(i)jδ

(i) j ξi),

j= , . . . ,mi;i= , . . . ,r, are separated from those of( –c(i)j +γ (i)

j ξi),j= , . . . ,ni;i= , . . . ,r,

and( –aj+ri=α (i)

j ξi),j= , . . . ,n. Here, the integersn,p,q,mi,ni,pi, qisatisfy the

inequalities ≤np;q≥, ≤miqiand ≤nipi,i= , . . . ,r.

Further, suppose that the parametersaj,j= , . . . ,p;c(i)j , j= , . . . ,pi;i= , . . . ,r, bj,j=

, . . . ,q;d(i)j ,j= , . . . ,qi;i= , . . . ,r, are complex numbers, while the associated coefficients α(i)j ,j= , . . . ,p;i= , . . . ,r;γj(i),j= , . . . ,pi;i= , . . . ,r,βj(i),j= , . . . ,q;i= , . . . ,r;δ

(i) j ,j=

, . . . ,qi;i= , . . . ,r, are positive real numbers such that

i= p

j= αj(i)+

pi

j= γj(i)–

q

j= βj(i)–

qi

j=

δj(i)≤, (.)

i= n

j= αj(i)–

p

j=n+ αj(i)+

q

j= βj(i)+

ni

j= γj(i)–

pi

j=ni+

γj(i)+

mi

j= δj(i)–

qi

j=mi+

δ(i)j > . (.)

It is assumed that the poles of integrand of (.) are simple. Under the conditions (.) the integrals in (.) converge absolutely (see [], p.) in the domain

arg(zi)< π

i, i= , . . . ,r, (.)

and pointszi= ,i= , . . . ,r, and various exceptional parameter values being tacitly

ex-cluded.

From Srivastava and Panda [], we have

H[z, . . . ,zr] =o

|z|e, . . . ,|zr|er, max

≤j≤r

|zj|→, (.)

whereei=min≤j≤mi[

(d(i)

j )

δj(i) ],i= , . . . ,r.

Ifn=  in (.), then the following asymptotic expansion (Srivastava and Panda []) holds:

H[z, . . . ,zr] =o

|z|g, . . . ,|zr|gr, min

≤j≤r

|zj|→ ∞, (.)

wheregi=max≤j≤mi[

(c(i)

j )

γj(i) ],i= , . . . ,r, provided that (.), (.) and (.) hold true.

Remark  When n= , the multivariable H-function defined by (.) reduces to the

(4)

variables is also defined and studied by Munot and Kalla [], Verma [] and Hai and Yakubovich [].

Remark  It is interesting to observe that forn=p=q= , the multivariableH-function breaks up into the product ofr,H-functions; and consequently, there holds the following result (Saxena []):

H,:{mr,nr}

,:{pr,qr}

⎡ ⎢ ⎢ ⎣

x

.. . xr

– :{(c(r)j ,γj(r)),pr}

– :{(d(r)j ,δ(r)j ),qr}

⎤ ⎥ ⎥ ⎦=

r

i=

Hmi,ni

pi,qi

zi{

(c(i)j ,γj(i)),pi}

{(d(i)j ,δj(i)),qi}

. (.)

Remark  The function defined by (.) was introduced and studied by Srivastava and Panda []. Whenαj()=· · ·=α(r)j ,j= , . . . ,p;βj()=· · ·=βj(r),j= , . . . ,q, in (.) the mul-tivariableH-function defined and studied by Saxena [, ] is obtained. In case all the Greek letters are assumed to be unity, theH-function of several complex variables (.) re-duces to the G-function of several complex variables studied by Khadia and Goyal [, ].

Remark  Fractional integrals involving multivariableH-functions are given in a series of papers by Saigo and Saxena [–], Srivastava and Hussain [], Saigoet al.[] and others.

In the sequel, Srivastava and Garg [], p., Eq. (.), introduced the

multivari-able analogue of the polynomials Sm

n(x). This first class of multivariable polynomials

Sm,...,ms

n (x, . . . ,xs) is defined by

Sm,...,ms

n (x, . . . ,xs) =

mk+···+msks≤n

k,...,ks=

(–n)mk+···+msks(n;k, . . . ,ks)

xk · · ·xks

s

k!· · ·ks!

, (.)

wherem, . . . ,msare arbitrary positive integers and the coefficients(n;k, . . . ,ks) (n,ki

,i= , . . . ,s) are arbitrary constants, real or complex.

2 Main results

In this section, we prove two theorems on composition of the Marichev-Saigo-Maeda op-erators with the product of a multivariableH-function and the first class of multivariable polynomials. We start with presenting image formulas involving Marichev-Saigo-Maeda fractional integral operators.

Lemma (see []) Letα,α,β,β,γ ∈C.

If (γ) > , (p) >max[, (α+α+βγ), (αβ)],then

I,xα,α,β,β,γxρ–=αα+γ– (ρ)(ρ+γαα

β)(ρ+βα)

(ρ+γαα)(ρ+γαβ)(ρ+β). (.)

If (γ) > , (p) <  +min[ (–β), (α+αγ), (α+βγ)],then

Iα,α,β,β,γ

x,∞ –=αα +γ–

×( +α+αγρ)( +α+βγρ)( –βρ)

(5)

Theorem  Let (γ) > andα,α,β,β,γ,μ,η,δj,vi,zi,a,b,cj∈C,λj,σi>  (i∈ {, . . . ,r};

j∈ {, . . . ,s}).Let the following conditions be satisfied,too: (i) |argzi|<π

i,i> (i= , . . . ,r),where

i= n

j= αj(i)–

p

j=n+ αj(i)–

q

j= βj(i)+

ni

j= γj(i)

pi

j=ni+

γj(i)+

mi

j= δj(i)–

qi

j=mi+

δj(i)> . (.)

(ii) min≤j≤mi,≤i≤r[–σi (d

(i)

j )

δj(i) ] < (μ) +min[ (α

), (β), (γαβ)].

(iii) |a

bx|< ,also we have

(μ) +

r

i=

σi min

≤j≤mi

(d(i) j ) δj(i)

>max, α+α+βγ, αβ (i= , . . . ,r),

(η) +

r

i=

vi min ≤j≤mi

(d(i) j ) δj(i)

>max, α+α+βγ, αβ (i= , . . . ,r).

(.)

Then the following result holds:

Iα+,α,β,β,γtμ–(bat)–ηSm,...,ms

n

c(bat)–δ, . . . ,cstλs(bat)–δs

×Hz(bat)–v, . . . ,zrtσr(bat)–vr (x)

=bηxμαα+γ–

mk+···+msks≤n

k,...,ks=

(–n)mk+···+msks k!· · ·ks!

(n;k, . . . ,ks)ck · · ·ckss

×b

s

j=δjkjxsj=λjkjH,n+:{mr,nr};,

p+,q+:{pr,qr};,

⎡ ⎢ ⎢ ⎢ ⎢ ⎣

zx

σbv

.. . zrx

σr

bvr

abx

(aj;α()j , . . . ,α (r)

j ),p,A:{(c(r)j ,γ (r) j ),pr}; –

(bj;βj(), . . . ,β (r)

j ),q,B:{(d(r)j ,δ (r)

j ),qr}; (, )

⎤ ⎥ ⎥ ⎥ ⎥

⎦, (.)

where

A=

 –η

s

j=

δjkj;v, . . . ,vr, 

,

 –μ

s

j=

λjkj;σ, . . . ,σr, 

,

 –μγ +α+α+β

s

j=

λjkj;σ, . . . ,σr, 

,

 –μ+αβ

s

j=

λjkj;σ, . . . ,σr, 

(6)

and

B=

 –η

s

j=

δjkj;v, . . . ,vr, 

,

 –μγ +α+α

s

j=

λjkj;σ, . . . ,σr, 

 –μγ +α+β

s

j=

λjkj;σ, . . . ,σr, 

,

 –μβ

s

j=

λjkj;σ, . . . ,σr, 

.

Theorem  Letα,α,β,β,γ,μ,η,δj,vi,zi,a,b,cj∈C,λj,σi>  (i∈ {, . . . ,r};j∈ {, . . . ,s})

and (γ) > .Let the following conditions be satisfied,too:

(μ) –

r

i=

σi min

≤j≤mi

(d(i) j ) δ(i)j

<  +max (–β), α+αγ, α+βγ,

(η) –

r

i=

vi≤j≤mmin

i

(d(i) j ) δj(i)

<  +max (–β), α+αγ, α+βγ,

and the conditions(i)-(iii)in Theoremare also satisfied. Then the following result holds:

Iα–,α,β,β,γtμ–(bat)ηSm,...,ms

n

c(bat)–δ, . . . ,cstλs(bat)–δs

×Hz(bat)–v, . . . ,zrtσr(bat)–vr (x)

=bηxμαα+γ–

mk+···+msks≤n

k,...,ks=

(–n)mk+···+msks k!· · ·ks!

(n;k, . . . ,ks)ck · · ·ckss

×b

s j=δjkj

x

s j=λjkj

H,n+:{mr,nr};,

p+,q+:{pr,qr};,

⎡ ⎢ ⎢ ⎢ ⎢ ⎣

zx

σbv

.. . zrx

σr

bvr

abx

(aj;αj(), . . . ,α (r)

j ),p,C:{(c(r)j ,γ (r) j ),pr}; –

(bj;βj(), . . . ,β (r)

j ),q,D:{(d(r)j ,δ (r)

j ),qr}; (, )

⎤ ⎥ ⎥ ⎥ ⎥

⎦, (.)

where

C=

 –η

s

j=

δjkj;v, . . . ,vr, 

,

 –μ

s

j=

λjkj;σ, . . . ,σr, 

,

 +α+α+βμγ

s

j=

λjkj;σ, . . . ,σr, 

,

 +αβμ

s

j=

λjkj;σ, . . . ,σr, 

(7)

and

D=

 –η

s

j=

δjkj;v, . . . ,vr, 

,

 –μγ+α+α

s

j=

λjkj;σ, . . . ,σr, 

 –μγ +α+β

s

j=

λjkj;σ, . . . ,σr, 

,

 –μβ

s

j=

λjkj;σ, . . . ,σr, 

.

Proof For convenience, let the left-hand side of (.) be denoted by I. Applying the Marichev-Saigo-Maeda generalized fractional operators (.) to the LHS of (.) and mak-ing use of (.) and (.), we obtain

I=

Iα+,α,β,β,γ

–(bat)–γ

mk+···+msks≤n

k,...,ks=

(–n)mk+···+msks k!· · ·ks!

(n;k, . . . ,ks)

×c(bat)δ

k

· · ·cstλs(bat)δs

ks×

(πi)r

L · · ·

Lr

φ(ξ, . . . ,ξr)

× r

i= θi(ξi)

zitσi(bat)νi

ξi

· · ·dξr

(x). (.)

By changing the order of summation and integration, we have

I=

mk+···+msks≤n

k,...,ks=

(–n)mk+···+msks k!· · ·ks!

(n;k, . . . ,ks)ck · · ·ckss

×

 (πi)r

L · · ·

Lr

φ(ξ, . . . ,ξr) r

i=

θi(ξi)zi ξi

I+α,α,β,β,γtμ+

s

j=λjkj+ri=σiξi–

×(bat)–η

s

j=λjkjri=σiξi (x)dξ

· · ·dξr

. (.)

By using the binomial expansion for (bat)–η

s j=λjkj

r

i=σiξi and applying the

Mellin-Barnes counter integral, we get

I=

mk+···+msks≤n

k,...,ks=

(–n)mk+···+msks k!· · ·ks!

(n;k, . . . ,ks)ck · · ·ckssbsj=λjkj

×

 (πi)r

L · · ·

Lr

φ(ξ, . . . ,ξrr

i=

θi(ξi)zibr

i=σiξi ξi

×

Lr+

(η+sj=λjkj+

r

i=σiξi+ξr+) (η+sj=λjkj+ri=σiξi)(ξr++ ) ×I+α,α,β,β,γtμ+

s j=λjkj+

r

i=σiξi+ξr+– (x)dξ

· · ·dξr

(8)

Applying (.) to (.) and re-interpreting the Mellin-Barnes counter integral in terms of the multivariableH-function ofr+  variables, we obtain the right-hand side of (.) after a few simplifications.

Assertion (.) of Theorem  can be proved in a similar manner by using (.) of

Lemma . So, we omit the details of the proof of Theorem .

Here, we derive certain, presumably, new formulas involving Marichev-Saigo-Maeda type fractional integral operators. By settingn=p=q=  in (.) and (.), respectively, we obtain two fractional integral formulas involving product of ther,H-functions stated in Corollaries  and  below.

Corollary  Letα,α,β,β,γ,μ,η,δj,vi,zi,a,b,cj∈C,λj,σi>  (i∈ {, . . .r};j∈ {, . . . ,s})

and (γ) > .Then the following relation holds true:

Iα+,α,β,β,γ

–(bat)ηSm,...,ms

n

c(bat)–δ, . . . ,cstλs(bat)–δs

× r

i=

Hmi,ni

pi,qi

zitσi(bat)–vi

(cij,Cji),pi

(dij,Dij),qi

(x)

=bηxμαα+γ–

mk+···+msks≤n

k,...,ks=

(–n)mk+···+msks k!· · ·ks!

(n;k, . . . ,ks)ck · · ·ckss

×b

s j=δjkj

x

s j=λjkj

H,:mi,ni;,

,:pi,qi;,

zix

σi

bvi –a

bx

A: (c(r)j ,γ (r) j ),pi; – B: (dj(r),δ(r)j ),qi; (, )

, (.)

where A and B are given in Theoremand Hm,n

p,q (·)is the familiar Fox H-function.

Corollary  Letα,α,β,β,γ,μ,η,δj,vi,zi,a,b,cj∈C,λj,σi>  (i∈ {, . . . ,r};j∈ {, . . . ,s})

and (γ) > .Then the following result holds true:

Iα–,α,β,β,γ

–(bat)–ηSm,...,ms

n

c(bat)–δ, . . . ,cstλs(bat)–δs

× r

i=

Hmi,ni

pi,qi

zitσi(bat)–vi

(ci j,Cji),pi

(di j,Dij),qi

(x)

=bηxμαα+γ–

mk+···+msks≤n

k,...,ks=

(–n)mk+···+msks k!· · ·ks!

(n;k, . . . ,ks)ck · · ·ckss

×b

s

j=δjkjxsj=λjkjH,:mi,ni;,

,:pi,qi;,

zix

σi

bvi

–a bx

C: (c(r)j ,γ (r) j ),pi; – D: (dj(r),δj(r)),qi; (, )

, (.)

where

C=

 –η

s

j=

δjkj;v, . . . ,vr, 

,

 –μ

s

j=

λjkj;σ, . . . ,σr, 

(9)

 –μγ +α+α+β

s

j=

λjkj;σ, . . . ,σr, 

,

 –μ+αβ

s

j=

λjkj;σ, . . . ,σr, 

and

D=

 –η

s

j=

δjkj;v, . . . ,vr, 

,

 –μγ +α+α

s

j=

λjkj;σ, . . . ,σr, 

,

 –μγ+α+β

s

j=

λjkj;σ, . . . ,σr, 

,

 –μβ

s

j=

λjkj;σ, . . . ,σr, 

,

where Hm,n

p,q (·)is the familiar Fox H-function.

Interestingly, in view of relation (.), we arrive at the following corollaries concerning Saigo fractional integral operator. It is similar to the results due to Agarwal [], p. and p., Eqs. () and ().

Corollary  Letα,β,γ,μ,η,δj,vi,zi,a,b,cj∈C,λj,σi>  (i∈ {, . . . ,r};j∈ {, . . . ,s}),and

(α) > .Let the following conditions be satisfied,too: (i) |argzi|<π

i,i> (i= , . . . ,r),where

i= – p

j=n+ αj(i)–

q

j= βj(i)+

ni

j= γj(i)–

pi

j=ni+

γj(i)

+

mi

j= δj(i)–

qi

j=mi+

δj(i)>  i∈ {, . . . ,r}.

(ii)

(μ) +

r

i= σi min

≤j≤mi

(d(i) j ) δj(i)

>max, (βγ),

(η) +

r

i=

vi min ≤j≤mi

(d(i) j ) δj(i)

>max, (βγ) and a

bx

< .

Then the following result holds:

Iα+,β,γtμ–(bat)ηSm,...,ms

n

c(bat)–δ, . . . ,cstλs(bat)–δs

×Hz(bat)–v, . . . ,zrtσr(bat)–vr (x)

=bηxμβ–

mk+···+msks≤n

k,...,ks=

(–n)mk+···+msks k!· · ·ks!

(10)

×b

s j=δjkjx

s

j=λjkjH,n+:{mr,nr};,

p+,q+:{pr,qr};,

⎡ ⎢ ⎢ ⎢ ⎢ ⎣

zx

σbv

.. . zrx

σr

bvr

abx

(aj;α()j , . . . ,α (r)

j ),p,A:{(c(r)j ,γ (r) j ),pr}; –

(bj;βj(), . . . ,β (r)

j ),q,B:{(dj(r),δ (r)

j ),qr}; (, )

⎤ ⎥ ⎥ ⎥ ⎥

⎦, (.)

where

A=

 –η

s

j=

δjkj;v, . . . ,vr, 

,

 –μ

s

j=

λjkj;σ, . . . ,σr, 

,

 –μγ +β

s

j=

λjkj;σ, . . . ,σr, 

and

B=

 –η

s

j=

δjkj;v, . . . ,vr, 

,

 –μ+β

s

j=

λjkj;σ, . . . ,σr, 

 –μγα

s

j=

λjkj;σ, . . . ,σr, 

,

and the conditions of existence of the above corollary follow easily from Theorem.

Corollary  Letα,β,γ,μ,η,δj,vi,zi,a,b,cj∈C,λj,σi>  (i∈ {, . . . ,r};j∈ {, . . . ,s}),and

(α) > .Let the following conditions be satisfied,too: (i) |argzi|<πi,i> (i= , . . . ,r),where

i= – p

j=n+ αj(i)–

q

j= βj(i)+

ni

j= γj(i)–

pi

j=ni+

γj(i)+

mi

j= δj(i)–

qi

j=mi+

δj(i)> .

(ii)

(μ) –

r

i= σi min

≤j≤mi

(d(i) j ) δ(i)j

<  +max (β), (γ) (i= , . . . ,r),

(η) –

r

i=

vi min ≤j≤mi

(d(i) j ) δj(i)

<  +max (β), (γ) (i= , . . . ,r).

Then the following result holds:

Iα–,β,γtμ–(bat)–ηSm,...,ms

n

c(bat)–δ, . . . ,cstλs(bat)–δs

×Hz(bat)–v, . . . ,zrtσr(bat)–vr (x)

=bηxμβ–

mk+···+msks≤n

k,...,ks=

(–n)mk+···+msks k!· · ·ks!

(11)

×b

s j=δjkjx

s

j=λjkjH,n+:{mr,nr};,

p+,q+:{pr,qr};,

⎡ ⎢ ⎢ ⎢ ⎢ ⎣

zx

σbv

.. . zrx

σr

bvr

abx

(aj;αj(), . . . ,α (r)

j ),p,C:{(c(r)j ,γ (r) j ),pr}; –

(bj;βj(), . . . ,β (r)

j ),q,D:{(d(r)j ,δ (r)

j ),qr}; (, )

⎤ ⎥ ⎥ ⎥ ⎥

⎦, (.)

where

C=

 –η

s

j=

δjkj;v, . . . ,vr, 

,

 –μ

s

j=

λjkj;σ, . . . ,σr, 

,

 +α+βμγ

s

j=

λjkj;σ, . . . ,σr, 

and

D=

 –η

s

j=

δjkj;v, . . . ,vr, 

,

 –γμ

s

j=

λjkj;σ, . . . ,σr, 

 +βμ

s

j=

λjkj;σ, . . . ,σr, 

,

and the conditions of existence of the above corollary follow easily from Theorem.

Remark  By puttingβ= –αandβ=  in Corollaries  and , respectively, we can ob-tain very interesting results involving the Riemann-Liouville and Erdélyi-Kober fractional integral operators.

3 Special cases and concluding remarks

Here we consider another variation of the results derived in the preceding sections. The multivariableH-function occurring in these results can be suitably specialized to yield a wide variety of special functions (or product of such functions) of one or more variables (see [], pp.-, -, - and []). Again, by suitably specializing the coefficient of the first class of multivariable polynomials, it can be reduced to other multivariable hy-pergeometric polynomials and classical orthogonal polynomials of one or more variables. (i) If we reduce the multivariableH-functions into the product of two FoxH-functions in Theorem  and then reduce oneH-function to the exponential function by takingσ= ,

v→, we obtain the following result after a little simplification:

Iα+,α,β,β,γ

–(bat)–ηSm,...,ms

n

c(bat)–δ, . . . ,cstλs(bat)–δs

×e–ztHp,qm,n

z(bat)–v

(cj,Cj),p

(dj,Dj),q

(x)

=bηxμαα+γ–

mk+···+msks≤n

k,...,ks=

(–n)mk+···+msks k!· · ·ks!

(12)

×b

s j=δjkjx

s

j=λjkjH,:,;m,n;,

,:,;p,q;,

⎡ ⎢ ⎣

zx

zx

σ

bv

abx

E: (cj,γj),p; –

F: (, );{(dj,δj),q}; (, )

⎤ ⎥

⎦, (.)

where

E=

 –η

s

j=

δjkj; ,v, 

,

 –μ

s

j=

λjkj; ,σ, 

,

 –μγ +α+α+β

s

j=

λjkj; ,σ, 

,

 –μ+αβ

s

j=

λjkj; ,σ, 

,

F=

 –η

s

j=

δjkj; ,v, 

,

 –μγ +α+α

s

j=

λjkj; ,σ, 

,

 –μγ +α+β

s

j=

λjkj; ,σ, 

,

 –μβ

s

j=

λjkj; ,σ, 

.

The conditions of validity of the above result easily follow from Theorem .

Remark  If we reduce the Marichev-Saigo-Maeda type fractional integral operator into

the Riemann-Liouville fractional integral operator and putSm,...,ms

n = ,η,v= , and make

a suitable adjustment in the parameters in the above equation, then we obtain the known result by Kilbas and Saigo [], p., Eq. (..); in addition, if we putSmnjj = ,η,v= , z= /,σ=  and reduce the FoxH-function to the Bessel function of the first kind,

then we obtain the known result given by Kilbas and Sebastian [], p., Eqs. ()-().

(ii) Next if we takez,σ=  andv=  in the result (.) and reduce theH-function

of one variable to a generalized Mittag-Leffler function [] (see also []), we can easily obtain the following result after a few simplifications:

Iα+,α,β,β,γtμ–(bat)ηSm,...,ms

n

c(bat)–δ, . . . ,cstλs(bat)–δs

×e–ztEvω,ξ[t] (x)

=b

ηxμαα+γ–

(v)

mk+···+msks≤n

k,...,ks=

(–n)mk+···+msks k!· · ·ks!

(n;k, . . . ,ks)ck · · ·ckss

×b

s

j=δjkj(–x)sj=λjkjH,:,;,;, ,:,;,;,

⎡ ⎢ ⎣

zx

xa bx

E: –; ( –v, ); –

F: (, ); (, ), ( –η; ); ( –ξ,ω); (, )

⎤ ⎥

(13)

where

E=

 –η

s

j=

δjkj; , , 

,

 –μ

s

j=

λjkj; , , 

,

 –μγ +α+α+β

s

j=

λjkj; , , 

,

 –μ+αβ

s

j=

λjkj; , , 

,

F=

 –η

s

j=

δjkj; , , 

,

 –μγ+α+α

s

j=

λjkj; , , 

,

 –μγ +α+β

s

j=

λjkj; , , 

,

 –μβ

s

j=

λjkj; , , 

.

The conditions of validity of (.) can be easily followed directly by those given with (.).

Remark  If we reduce the Marichev-Saigo-Maeda type fractional integral operator to

the Riemann-Liouville fractional integral operator and setSm,...,ms

n = ,η,v= , and make

a suitable adjustment in the parameters in equation (.), then we arrive at the known result given by Saxenaet al.[], p., Eq. (.).

(iii) Again, if we reduce theH-function of one variable to the generalized Wright hyper-geometric function [], p., Eq. (..), in the result (.), we arrive at the following new and interesting result:

Iα+,α,β,β,γ

–(bat)–ηSm,...,ms

n

c(bat)–δ, . . . ,cstλs(bat)–δs

×e–ztpψq

z(bat)–v

( –cj,Cj),p

(, ), ( –dj,Dj),q

(x)

=bηxμαα+γ–

mk+···+msks≤n

k,...,ks=

(–n)mk+···+msks k!· · ·ks!

(n;k, . . . ,ks)ck · · ·ckss

×b

s

j=δjkjxjs=λjkjH,:,;,p;,

,:,;p,q;,

⎡ ⎢ ⎣

zx

zx

σbv

abx

E: (cj,Cj),p; –

F: (, );{(dj,Dj),q}; (, )

⎤ ⎥

⎦, (.)

where

E=

 –η

s

j=

δjkj; ,v, 

,

 –μ

s

j=

λjkj; ,σ, 

,

 –μγ +α+α+β

s

j=

λjkj; ,σ, 

,

 –μ+αβ

s

j=

λjkj; ,σ, 

(14)

F=

 –η

s

j=

δjkj; ,v, 

,

 –μγ +α+α

s

j=

λjkj; ,σ, 

,

 –μγ +α+β

s

j=

λjkj; ,σ, 

,

 –μβ

s

j=

λjkj; ,σ, 

.

(iv) Further Theorem , if we reduce the multivariableH-function to the product of r-different Whittaker functions [], p., Eq. (..), and takevi→,σi= , then we

arrive at the following result:

Iα+,α,β,β,γ

–(bat)ηSm,...,ms

n

c(bat)–δ, . . . ,cstλs(bat)–δs

× r

i=

ezitWλ

i,μi(zit)

(x)

=bηxμαα+γ–

mk+···+msks≤n

k,...,ks=

(–n)mk+···+msks k!· · ·ks!

(n;k, . . . ,ks)ck · · ·ckss

×b

s j=δjkjx

s

j=λjkjH,:,;...;,;,

,:,;...;,;,

⎡ ⎢ ⎢ ⎢ ⎢ ⎣

zx

.. . zrx

abx

G: –; ( –λ, ); . . . ; ( –λr, ); –

H: (/±μ, ); . . . ; (/±μr, )(, )

⎤ ⎥ ⎥ ⎥ ⎥

⎦, (.)

where

G=

 –η

s

j=

δjkj; , . . . ,  ! rtimes

, 

,

 –μ

s

j=

λjkj; , . . . ,  ! rtimes

, 

,

 –μγ +α+α+β

s

j=

λjkj; , . . . ,  ! rtimes

, 

,

 –μ+αβ

s

j=

λjkj; , . . . ,  ! rtimes

, 

,

H=

 –η

s

j=

δjkj; , . . . ,  ! rtimes

, 

,

 –μγ +α+α

s

j=

λjkj; , . . . ,  ! rtimes

, 

,

 –μγ +α+β

s

j=

λjkj; , . . . ,  ! rtimes

, 

,

 –μβ

s

j=

λjkj; , . . . ,  ! rtimes

, 

.

The conditions of validity of the above result easily follow from Theorem .

Remark  If we reduce the Marichev-Saigo-Maeda type fractional integral operator to the Riemann-Liouville fractional integral operator and setSm,...,ms

n = ,η,v= , and make

(15)

(v) Finally, if we reduce the multivariable H-function into the product of two Fox

H-functions in Theorem  and then reduce oneH-function to the exponential function

by settingσ,λj,v,δj= ,cj,s=  andSmn to the Hermite polynomial [, ], and we set

S

n[x] =xn/Hn[√x], in this casem= ,An,k= (–)k, we obtain the following interesting

result:

Iα+,α,β,β,γ

–(bat)–ηtn/Hn

 √t

×e–ztHp,qm,n

z(bat)–v

(cj,Cj),p

(dj,Dj),q

(x)

=bηxμαα+γ–

mk+···+msks≤n

k,...,ks=

(–n)mk+···+msks k!· · ·ks!

(n;k, . . . ,ks)ck · · ·ckss

×b

s j=δjkjx

s

j=λjkjH,:,;{m,n};,

,:,;{p,q};,

⎡ ⎢ ⎣

zx

zx

σbv

abx

G: (c(r)j ,γj(r)),pr; – H: (, );{(dj,δj),q}; (, )

⎤ ⎥

⎦, (.)

where

G=

 –η

s

j=

δjkj; ,v, 

,

 –μ

s

j=

λjkj; ,σ, 

,

 –μγ +α+α+β

s

j=

λjkj; ,σ, 

,

 –μ+αβ

s

j=

λjkj; ,σ, 

,

H=

 –η

s

j=

δjkj; ,v, 

,

 –μγ +α+α

s

j=

λjkj; ,σ, 

,

 –μγ +α+β

s

j=

λjkj; ,σ, 

,

 –μβ

s

j=

λjkj; ,σ, 

.

The conditions of validity of the above result can be easily derived from Theorem . A large number of other special cases of our main result can also be obtained, but we do not mention them here on account of the lack of space.

Now, we conclude our present investigation by remarking that the fractional integration (of Marichev-Saigo-Maeda type) of the products of multivariableH-functions and the first class of multivariable polynomials established in this paper will be useful for investigators in various disciplines of applied sciences and engineering physics. We are also trying to find certain possible applications of those results presented here to some other research areas, for example, obtaining a closed form solution of a fractional generalization of a free electron equation.

Competing interests

(16)

Authors’ contributions

All authors have participated in the obtained results. The collaboration of each one cannot be separated in different parts of the paper. All of them have made substantial contributions to the theoretical results. All authors have been involved in drafting the manuscript and revising it critically for important intellectual content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Author details

1Department of Mathematics, Anand International College of Engineering, Jaipur, 303012, India.2Department of

Economics, Belarusian State University, Minsk, 220030, Belarus.3Institute of Mathematics, National University of

Uzbekistan, Tashkent, 100125, Uzbekistan.4Department of Mathematics, Fateh College for Women, Bathinda, 151103,

India.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Dr. S Jain for her useful suggestions during discussions and to anonymous reviewers for their valuable remarks.

Endnote

a Here and in what follows, we denote byωan imaginary unit.

Received: 22 July 2015 Accepted: 30 October 2015

References

1. Baleanu, D, Diethelm, K, Scalas, E, Trujillo, JJ: Fractional Calculus: Models and Numerical Methods. World Scientific, Singapore (2012)

2. Caponetto, R, Dongola, G, Fortuna, L, Petráš, I: Fractional Order Systems: Modeling and Control Applications. World Scientific, Singapore (2010)

3. Caputo, M, Mainardi, F: Linear models of dissipation in anelastic solids. Riv. Nuovo Cimento, Ser. II1, 161-198 (1971) 4. Hilfer, R (ed.): Applications of Fractional Calculus in Physics. Word Scientific, River Edge (2000)

5. Mainardi, F: Fractional Calculus and Waves in Linear Viscoelasticity. Imperial College Press, London (2010) 6. Mathai, AM, Saxena, RK, Haubold, HJ: TheH-Function: Theory and Applications. Springer, Dordrecht (2010) 7. Prakasa Rao, BLS: Statistical Inference for Fractional Diffusion Processes. Wiley, Chichester (2010) 8. Rabotnov, YN: Elements of Hereditary Solid Mechanics. Mir, Moscow (1980)

9. Tarasov, VE: Fractional Dynamics: Application of Fractional Calculus to Dynamics of Particles, Fields and Media. Springer, Berlin (2010)

10. Uchaikin, VV: Fractional Derivatives for Physicists and Engineers. Volume I: Background and Theory. Springer, Berlin (2013)

11. Uchaikin, VV: Fractional Derivatives for Physicists and Engineers. Volume II: Applications. Springer, Berlin (2013) 12. Zaslavsky, GM: Hamiltonian Chaos and Fractional Dynamics. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2005)

13. Marichev, OI: Volterra equation of Mellin convolution type with a Horn function in the kernel. Izv. Akad. Nauk BSSR, Ser. Fiz.-Mat. Nauk1, 128-129 (1974)

14. Saigo, M, Maeda, N: More generalization of fractional calculus. In: Rusev, P, Dimovski, I, Kiryakova, V (eds.) Transform Methods and Special Functions, Varna, 1996 (Proc. 2nd Intern. Workshop), pp. 386-400. IMI-BAS, Sofia (1998) 15. Saxena, RK, Saigo, M: Generalized fractional calculus of theH-function associated with the Appell functionF3. J. Fract.

Calc.19, 89-104 (2001)

16. Agarwal, P: Generalized fractional integration of theH-function. Matematiche67(2), 107-118 (2012)

17. Agarwal, P: Fractional integration of the product of two multivariablesH-function and a general class of polynomials. In: Anastassiou, GA, Duman, O (eds.) Advances in Applied Mathematics and Approximation Theory, vol. 41, pp. 359-374. Springer, New York (2013)

18. Baleanu, D, Agarwal, P: On generalized fractional integral operators and the generalized Gauss hypergeometric functions. Abstr. Appl. Anal.2014, Article ID 630840 (2014). doi:10.1155/2014/630840

19. Choi, J, Agarwal, P: Certain integral transform and fractional integral formulas for the generalized Gauss hypergeometric functions. Abstr. Appl. Anal.2014, Article ID 735946 (2014). doi:10.1155/2014/735946 20. Srivastava, HM, Agarwal, P: Certain fractional integral operators and the generalized incomplete hypergeometric

functions. Appl. Appl. Math.8(2), 333-345 (2013)

21. Saxena, RK: On theH-function ofnvariables. Kyungpook Math. J.17, 221-226 (1977)

22. Srivastava, HM, Panda, R: Expansion theorems for theH-function of several complex variables. J. Reine Angew. Math. 288, 129-145 (1976)

23. Saigo, M: On generalized fractional calculus operators. In: Recent Advances in Applied Mathematics (Proc. Internat. Workshop held at Kuwait Univ.), Kuwait Univ., Kuwait, pp. 441-450 (1996)

24. Kiryakova, V: On two Saigo’s fractional integral operators in the class of univalent functions. Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal. 9(2), 160-176 (2006)

25. McBride, AC: Fractional Calculus and Integral Transforms of Generalized Functions. Research Notes in Math., vol. 31. Pitman, London (1979)

26. Olver, FWJ, Lozier, DW, Boisvert, RF, Clark, CW (eds.): NIST Handbook of Mathematical Functions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2010)

27. Saigo, M: A remark on integral operators involving the Gauss hypergeometric functions. Math. Rep. Coll. Gen. Educ. Kyushu Univ.11, 135-143 (1978)

28. Srivastava, HM, Panda, R: Some bilateral generating functions for a class of generalized hypergeometric polynomials. J. Reine Angew. Math.283/284, 265-274 (1976)

29. Srivastava, HM, Panda, R: Certain multidimensional integral transformations. I. Ned. Akad. Wet. Proc., Ser. A, Indag. Math.40, 118-131 (1978)

(17)

31. Srivastava, HM, Gupta, KC, Goyal, SP: TheH-Functions of One and Two Variables with Applications. South Asian Publishers, New Delhi (1982)

32. Srivastava, HM, Panda, R: Some expansion theorems and generating relations for theH-functions of several complex variables. II. Comment. Math. Univ. St. Pauli25, 169-197 (1976)

33. Mittal, PK, Gupta, KC: An integral involving generalized function of two variables. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci., Sect. A75, 117-123 (1972)

34. Munot, PC, Kalla, SL: On an extension of generalized function of two variables. Rev. Univ. Nac. Tucumán Ser. A21, 67-84 (1971)

35. Verma, RU: On theH-function of two variables - II. An. ¸Stiin¸t. Univ. ‘Al.I. Cuza’ Ia¸si, Mat.17, 103-109 (1971) 36. Hai, NT, Yakubovich, SB: The Double Mellin-Barnes Type Integrals and Their Applications to Convolution Theory.

World Scientific, Singapore (1992)

37. Srivastava, HM, Panda, R: Expansion theorems for theH-function of several complex variables. J. Reine Angew. Math. 288, 129-145 (1976)

38. Saxena, RK: On a generalized function ofnvariables. Kyungpook Math. J.14, 255-259 (1974)

39. Khadia, SS, Goyal, AN: On the generalized function ofnvariables - II. Vijnana Parishad Anusandhan Patrika18, 359-366 (1975)

40. Khadia, SS, Goyal, AN: On the generalized function ofn-variables. Vijnana Parishad Anusandhan Patrika13, 191-201 (1970)

41. Saigo, M, Saxena, RK: Unified fractional integral formulas for the multivariableH-function. J. Fract. Calc.15, 91-107 (1999)

42. Saigo, M, Saxena, RK: Unified fractional integral formulas for the multivariableH-function - II. J. Fract. Calc.16, 99-110 (1999)

43. Saigo, M, Saxena, RK: Unified fractional integral formulas for the multivariableH-function - III. J. Fract. Calc.20, 45-68 (2001)

44. Srivastava, HM, Hussain, MA: Fractional integration of theH-function of several variables. Comput. Math. Appl.30, 73-85 (1995)

45. Saigo, M, Saxena, RK, Ram, J: Fractional integration of the product of Appell functionF3and multivariableH-function.

J. Fract. Calc.27, 31-42 (2005)

46. Srivastava, HM, Garg, M: Some integrals involving a general class of polynomials and multivariableH-function. Rev. Roum. Phys.32, 685-692 (1987)

47. Agarwal, P: Further results on fractional calculus of Saigo operator. Appl. Appl. Math.7(2), 585-594 (2012) 48. Srivastava, HM, Singh, NP: The integration of certain product of the multivariableH-function with a general class of

polynomials. Rend. Circ. Mat. Palermo32, 157-187 (1983)

49. Kilbas, AA, Saigo, M:H-Transforms: Theory and Application. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton (2004)

50. Kilbas, AA, Sebastian, N: Generalized fractional integration of Bessel function of first kind. Integral Transforms Spec. Funct.19(12), 869-883 (2008)

51. Prabhakar, TR: A singular integral equation with a generalized Mittag-Leffler function in the kernel. Yokohama Math. J. 19, 7-15 (1971)

52. Gorenflo, R, Kilbas, A, Mainardi, F, Rogosin, S: Mittag-Leffler Function, Related Topics and Applications. Springer, Berlin (2014)

53. Saxena, RK, Ram, J, Suthar, DL: Fractional calculus of generalized Mittag-Leffler functions. J. Indian Acad. Math.31(1), 165-172 (2009)

54. Kilbas, AA: Fractional calculus of the generalized Wright function. Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal.8(2), 113-126 (2005) 55. Srivastava, HM, Saxena, RK, Ram, J: Some multidimensional fractional integral operations involving a general class of

References

Related documents

In this article, we quantify further the relationship between the variation and the mean of human mortality by testing the application of TL to human death

However, the resolved trans (+)-R, R analogue (DAT IC50 = 0.46 nM) had a high binding affinity much greater than GBR 12909 and its unhydroxylated parent piperidine compound and

amino acid 2-carboxy-6-hydroxyloctahydroindole (Choi) moiety; the Choi 5 (Figure 5.2) 36 is the core structure in the aeruginosins, and is indispensable to their

Implementing learning using learning strategies with PBL as one of the alternatives in the learning of mathematics. With learning strategy and PBL learning achievement of

The researchers adopted Al-Nouh, Abdul-Kareem, and Taqi's (2014) scale measuring 'EFL Teachers’ Attitudes toward Creativity and Their Perceptions of Practice'. Based

Testing null hypothesis - To investigate the null hypothesis, stating that there is no statistically significant relationship between participants' linguistic intelligence