• No results found

North Carolina Criminal Justice Performance Measures

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "North Carolina Criminal Justice Performance Measures"

Copied!
11
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

North Carolina  Criminal Justice 

Performance Measures

November 17, 2014

(2)

31,581

40,824 41,030

37,665

0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000 40,000 45,000

FY 1997

FY 1998

FY 1999

FY 2000

FY 2001

FY 2002

FY 2003

FY 2004

FY 2005

FY 2006

FY 2007

FY 2008

FY 2009

FY 2010

FY 2011

FY 2012

FY 2013

FY 2014

North Carolina Prison Population:  FY 1997‐FY 2014

Prison Population

FY2000–FY2009 Growth:

+ 29%

FY1997-FY2000 Growth:

- 3%

In 2009, the state’s prison population was  growing significantly.

Since enactment of JRA in 2011, prison  population has decreased 8 percent. 

Reduced prison population allowed the state  to remain out of jail backlog for the past  three fiscal years saving what was a $1  million dollar per month cost during first 6  months of FY 2011.

FY2011–FY2014 Growth:

- 8%

Justice  reinvestment 

(2011)

Average Daily  Backlog

Yearly Cost (Millions)

FY 2007 27 $0.40 

FY 2008 125 $1.83 

FY 2009 208 $3.04 

FY 2010 659 $9.67 

FY 2011* 402 $5.85 

FY 2012 0 $0.00 

FY 2013 0 $0.00 

FY 2014 0 $0.00 

*through only first 6 months of FY2010‐2011 

(3)

Prison Composition

76%of the probation revocations to prison were for  technical violations of supervision in 2009

100%of technical violators now serve a 90 day period of  confinement in response to violation (CRV) 

11,586

15,976

15,118

7,440

0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000 16,000 18,000

FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014

North Carolina Prison Admissions FY 2001 ‐ FY 2014

Probation Revocations

New Offense Convictions

Other

Justice  reinvestment 

(2011)

Probation Revocations as %  of Total Prison Admissions

FY 2001 50%

FY 2002 49%

FY 2003 51%

FY 2004 51%

FY 2005 52%

FY 2006 53%

FY 2007 51%

FY 2008 51%

FY 2009 53%

FY 2010 52%

FY 2011 52%

FY 2012 46%

FY 2013 37%

FY 2014 37%

544

2,429

2,731

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000

FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014

CRV Entries:  FY 2012 ‐ FY 2014

50% Drop in  Revocation  Entries

(4)

Population Trends

30,000 35,000 40,000 45,000

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2014

Actual Prison Population 37,665 2005 Actual

Prison Population 36,663

Prison Population at JRA  Passing June 2011

41,030

8% drop in prison population 50% drop in probation revocations

JRA Projected Prison Population

38,264 Baseline Projected Prison

Population 43,220

5% increase from June 2011 population

11.5 percent drop in the projected 2017  prison population:  from 43,220 to 38,264 8 percent drop in prison population between  2011 and 2014:  from 41,030 to 37,665

50 percent drop in admissions due to  probation revocation between 2011 and  2014:  from 15,118 to 7,440

(5)

Prison Releases

15,147

8,716

17,814 18,244

0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000 16,000 18,000 20,000

FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 FY2013 FY2014 Exits without Supervision

In FY2011,  84% of all structured sentencing  felony prison releases did not receive 

supervision 

In FY2014,  48%  of structured sentencing prison  releases received no supervision and the trend  continues to decline

Prison Exits

(6)

Probation Revocations

36.0% 37.6%

19.7%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

40.0%

FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014

Probation Revocation Rates:  FY 2007 ‐FY 2014

Justice  reinvestment 

(2011) 47 percent drop in revocation rate 

between FY 2011 and FY 2014:  from  37.6% to 19.7%

53 percent drop in offenders exiting  probation due to revocation 

between FY 2011 and FY 2014:  from  24,995 to 11,686

Impact of reduced case loads:

• Greater emphasis on high risk  offenders.

• Quality contacts; more ability to  focus on offender needs.

0 20 40 60 80 100

Pre‐JRA Post‐JRA

Average Caseload

(7)

Probation Revocation by Risk Level

JRA codified existing practice of using risk assessment to drive supervision  and re‐focused probation practice. 

Association between risk and revocation rates indicate renewed focus on risk  assessment is on target; offenders with higher risk profiles are more likely to  be have probation revoked.  

FY 2014 revocation rates declined for all risk levels; higher risk offenders had  greater reductions:

High risk decreased from 62% to 53%

Medium risk decreased from 33% to 30%

Low risk decreased from 15% to 12%

61% 64% 65%

58%

62%

53%

39% 37%

27% 23%

33% 30%

39%

31%

20%

13% 15%

12%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014

Revocation Rate by Risk Level

High Risk Medium Risk Low Risk

(8)

Swift & Certain Sanctions

267

1,166 1,389

412

615

99

515

184

853

0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000

FY 11‐12 FY 12‐13 FY 13‐14

Delegated Authority High Risk Delegated Authority Quick Dip (2 Day) Quick Dip (3 Day) Cases

JRA created additional  tools for probation  officers to increase  offender accountability  with swift and certain  responses to negative  behavior.

Use of JRA tools has  increased significantly; 

especially utilization of  administrative jail  sanction (“quick‐dip”).

Compared outcomes for 368 offenders who had a quick dip to a  group of matched offenders who did not have a quick dip as a  response to similar non‐compliance.

91.8 percent  (338) of the offenders with a quick dip had a positive  outcome compared to only 53.3 percent (196) of offenders from  the comparison group, who did not have a quick dip.

0.1%

19.5%

0.2%

10.6%

7.9%

16.6%

0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0%

Quick Dip No Quick Dip

Quick Dip Outcomes

Absconded Revoked Unsatisfactory Termination

(9)

Arrests and Crime Trends

0 100,000 200,000 300,000 400,000 500,000 600,000

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

0 50,000 100,000 150,000 200,000 250,000 300,000 350,000 400,000 450,000

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000 40,000 45,000

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

Arrests

Index Crimes

Violent Crimes

Total Arrests Arrest Rate

CY2006 519,206 5,844.5

CY2007 507,527 5,587.8

CY2008 509,828 5,500.0

CY2009 499,461 5,299.4

CY2010 489,725 5,135.8

CY2011 479,135 4,956.9

CY2012 469,885 4,811.8

CY2013 431,650 4,376.9

Total Index Index Crime

Crimes Rate

CY2006 398,613 4,487.0

CY2007 404,863 4,457.5

CY2008 406,479 4,385.1

CY2009 374,322 3,971.7

CY2010 359,854 3,773.8

CY2011 368,580 3,813.1

CY2012 357,074 3,656,6

CY2013 334,928 3,396.2

Total Violent Violent Crime

Crimes Rate

CY2006 41,408 466.1

CY2007 41,757 459.7

CY2008 42,330 456.7

CY2009 37,260 395.3

CY2010 34,016 356.7

CY2011 33,341 344.9

CY2012 33,985 348.0

CY2013 32,433 328.9

Down 16.9%

Down 21.7%

Murder, Rape, Robbery,

Aggravate Assault, Burglary,

Larceny,

Motor Vehicle Theft

Murder, Rape, Robbery,

Aggravate Assault

(10)

Spending

Fiscal Year DPS Authorized  Budget

Probation  Authorized Budget

Parole Authorized  Budget

2006‐2007 $1,208,819,047  $143,968,694  $1,409,133  2007‐2008 $1,311,798,560  $148,234,414  $1,406,583  2008‐2009 $1,508,499,024  $164,813,620  $1,488,674  2009‐2010 $1,403,028,420  $173,391,028  $1,535,166  2010‐2011 $1,365,379,681  $167,415,122  $1,502,511  2011‐2012 $1,412,886,261  $168,248,407  $1,696,677  2012‐2013 $1,423,972,223  $171,775,103  $1,938,747 

Budget as a Percent of Total  NC Appropriations:

2006‐2007 6.4%

2007‐2008 6.3%

2008‐2009 7.1%

2009‐2010 7.4%

2010‐2011 7.2%

2011‐2012 7.2%

2012‐2013 7.1%

5.60%

5.80%

6.00%

6.20%

6.40%

6.60%

6.80%

7.00%

7.20%

7.40%

7.60%

Budget as a Percent of Total  NC Appropriations

While overall spending on corrections and public safety continues  to increase, the proportion of public funds spent in this area has  begun to decline.

Fiscal Year Budget Allocations

(11)

Reinvestments

Savings Achieved as of January 2015

Reinvestments to Date

11 Prison Closures $    55.80 million

Regional Office Closure $       1.02 million

Eliminate Double Celling (Pamlico) $       2.40 million

Operating Budget Reduction $    10.00 million

Prison Conversions (Eastern & Johnston) $       6.94 million Diagnostic Center Reduction $       0.82 million Remove Misdemeanants from State Prison $       6.64 million Total JRA Reductions $    83.62 million

175 Additional Probation Parole Officers & Equipment $    14.63  million Increase Parole Commission Staff $       0.38  million Expand Electronic Monitoring Program $       1.80  million Provide Substance Abuse Treatment for High Risk/High 

Need Individuals

$       4.00  million Fund Treatment for Effective Community Supervision 

Program

$       4.14  million

Fund CRV Centers $       7.43  million

Total JRA Reinvestments $    32.38 million

 $‐

 $50.00  $100.00

Savings Reinvestment

Millions

References

Related documents

Moreover, given the revelations from Levin's senate investigations on the credit rating agencies and the conflicts on interest that result in rating the securities of the issuers

・ Expand sales of health foods by increasing the number of wholesale channel stores handling our products and in FANCL’s store sales channel renewing or

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA CRIMINAL JUSTICE INSTRUCTOR EVALUATION Form F-16 (Rev. 10.01) Criminal Justice Standards Division Post Office Drawer 149. Restorative Justice Information

Subscriber acquisition costs include hardware subsidies paid to radio manufacturers, distributors and automakers, including subsidies paid to automakers who include a SIRIUS radio

Special meetings of the Council shall beheld at any time at the call of the Section Chair, any three members of the Council or of the President or the Board of Governors of the

The North Vancouver RCMP and West Vancouver Police Department work with the North Shore Restorative Justice Society to offer an alternative to the criminal justice system.. If the

The North Carolina Medical Assistance Provider Fraud statute (N.C. §108A-63) allows North Carolina officials to seek criminal penalties against providers who defraud the

financial progress Expiration alerts (contract, warranties) Expiration alerts (contract, warranties) Approval workflow Approval workflow Knowledge Management Knowledge