IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE NO. Defendant

This is a civil action brought by the United States of America under §§ 7402 and 7408 of the Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C.) (I.R.C.) to enjoin defendant, Lorenzo Lamantia,

Because King has failed to state a cognizable claim for relief, the Court will adopt the R&R, overrule King’s objections, and deny King’s motion for preliminary injunction

Thus, this paper contributes to the existing literature on the random walk hypothesis, by providing additional evidence on the Malaysian stock market efficiency,

The Defendant has been and/or is directly infringing and/or inducing others to infringe the ’077 patent by, among other things, making, using, making available for another’s

Defendants’ use of a mark confusingly similar to Plaintiff’s SEATTLE PLUMBING COMPANY mark in commerce as described above has caused and continues to cause irreparable harm

Specifically, Nyrop must raise a genuine issue of material fact that (1) that the District’s explanation is “unworthy of credence because it has no basis in fact,” or (2) “that

After the filing of this Stipulation but before distribution of any portion of the 5 Settlement Fund, if a case is commenced in respect of any Defendant under Title 11 of the 6

Event to approve the bell buckle vendor application sent, be an event with all amounts paid by location in bell buckle expects all in the craft fair.. Assortment of defense in