• No results found

Evaluation of DHS' Information Security Program for Fiscal Year 2015

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Evaluation of DHS' Information Security Program for Fiscal Year 2015"

Copied!
68
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

Loading

Figure

Figure 1: DHS’ SA and Weakness Remediation Progress
Figure 2: Discrepancies on the Number of Unsupported Operating Systems Reported  CBP  DHS
Figure 3: SA Status for FEMA, S&T, USCG, and USSS as of July 2015
Figure 5: End of Fiscal Year Component SA Comparison
+3

References

Related documents

The optimally integrated benefit design differs from the standard single good designs by taking into account cross-price elasticities between the several services and goods

Bu tercihlerinin kendilerine nasıl davranıldığıyla değil, bu insanın yi­ yeceğini başka maymunlarla paylaşarak edindiği şöhretle alakası vardır.24 Bizim kendi

We expect the ongoing reduction in vacant space to sustain rental growth for the rest of the year in the German cities.. In Milan, the current state of the market and the ongoing

Based on management’s response and our review of information provided by the Office of Information Technology, we deleted one recommendation (draft report Recommendation 3) that

Furthermore, this chapter presents the role of attachment theory, parental practices, how the marital status, socio-economic status and gender of the parent could

As part of our Technical Security Evaluation Program, we evaluated technical and information security policies and procedures of Department of Homeland Security components at

Specifically, we: (1) used last year's FISMA evaluation as a baseline for this year's evaluation; (2) reviewed policies, procedures, and practices that DHS had implemented at

Component levels; (3) reviewed DHS’ POA&M process to ensure that all security weaknesses are identified, tracked, and addressed; (4) reviewed the processes and status of