Public Cord Blood Banking at the
National Cord Blood Program (NCBP)
A. Scaradavou, MD
Medical Director, National Cord Blood Program, New York Blood Center
Associate Attending, Pediatric BMT Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
2
CB as hematopoietic stem cell graft
• The blood remaining in the placenta and umbilical cord after the birth of baby is rich is hematopoietic stem cells
• This blood can be harvested easily, with no risk to the mother or baby
Advantages of CB in transplantation
Easy access – large numbers of donors – ethnic diversity Can be collected and stored (cryopreserved) in CB Banks
Available upon demand – no delays in transplants Lower risk of viral infections
Immunologically “naïve” T cells: do not need “perfect” match
Considerations
Cell dose (volume) Transmission of (unknown) diseases
Background: CB Collection Models
In Utero Collection: after delivery of newborn; placenta still in utero
Ex Utero Collection: placenta delivered and removed from delivery room; collection performed by trained technologists
CB collection “kit” Ex utero CB collection
Placenta
Umbilical Cord
Cord Blood Unit
Cord Blood Collection (NCBP)
Ex utero collection
Trained collection personnel
TNC count at collection - Identification of clinical units
Maternal Consent - sample - Questionnaire - Records
Transportation to the Bank - temperature monitoring
Time from collection to
completion of processing: maximum 36 hours
What is a “bankable” CBU
“Adequate” TNC (volume): above Bank’s “cut-off”
Not Clotted
Maternal informed consent – medical information
No Contamination with Bacteria/Fungi
No Contamination with Mother’s Blood
Processed within 36 hours* from collection
Adequate / Viable Hematopoietic Progenitor Cells
Complete infectious disease testing
*FACT requires
maximum of 48 hrs from collection
Background:
CB Processing Methods
• Manual or Automatic Processing
• Closed System or Open System
• Volume Reduction Only
• Red Cell Depletion Only
AXP: Automated Processing System
Partial RBC depletion and volume reduction
Closed manufacturing system; Aseptic processing
Accurate final product volume; Consistent, low hematocrit
High recovery of mononuclear and CD34+ cells; excellent viability
Cord Blood Processing (NCBP)
Plasma
RBCs
Cord Blood freezing and storage
Two-compartment Cryopreservation Bag; total volume: 25 mL HPC-C cryoprotected in DMSO; final DMSO concentration: 10%
1 2
Segments: identity and potency testing post-cryopreservation
1: HLA Confirmatory Typing; 2: CD34+ count/viability, CFU testing 3: retention sample
CB storage
Individual CBU:
controlled rate freezing (CRF) long-term storage in liquid nitrogen in the same freezer reduced transient warming events
automated retrieval Standardization:
highly reproducible
cryopreservation profiles computerized system
Cord Blood cryopreservation - storage
Capacity: 3600 HPC, Cord Blood products BioArchive
Cord Blood Testing
Maternal blood sample: donor ID screening including NAT for HIV/HCV/HBV and WNV, and testing for CMV
CB: CBC, CD45+/CD34+ cells and viability, CFU assays
CB: ABO, Rh, SS hemoglobin (HPLC); molecular Hb testing as needed
CB: Bacteriology (bacterial, fungal, aerobic, anaerobic)
CB: Testing for relevant genetic diseases can beperformed prior to transplant
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500
0 200 400 600 800 1000
Potency: CFU counts and vCD34+ cells
vC
D3
4/mL
10
^3
CFU/ mL 10^3
R²= 0.76 Y=1.4x + 0.86
The “life cycle” of a clinical CBU
Permission to collect - review medical recordHarvest CB TNC
Label CBU - Clinical - Informed consent –
maternal questionnaire
Testing: Potency, IDMs, eligibility, HLA, other QA Review: CBU Release to Search (status)
Research CBU No identifiers No further tests
Review for patient: TNC/match HLA CT from segment
CBU Release for Transplant
Processing - Cryopreservation - Freezing Total Nucleated Cell count at collection
Cord Blood Shipping - Transportation
CB Unit
Shipping Container
< -150C for 5-7 days
CryoShipper Lid CB Unit
Shipping container Continuous temperature
monitoring during transportation
-190° C
NCBP HPC, Cord Blood: final product
Highly regulated stem cell source
Accreditations: FACT or AABB
HEMACORD: NCBP FDA licensed product
November 2011: First stem cell product to be licensed
Stability studies of CB products:
a) Does the “time in storage” affect potency or engraftment ability
b) Is there an expiration date for the products?
HPC, Cord Blood Stability Studies
Example: Labeling
Manufacturing – Expiration Date
NEW CONTAINER LABEL APPLIED AT SHIPMENT
“PARTIAL” LABEL
PRINTED AT SHIPMENT
EXPIRATION DATE PRODUCT NAME
Access to the NCBP CB Inventory
NCBP’s Web portal: WebSearch Registries:
•
Single Point of Access – NMDP Distributed SearchNW Eu rope
Easte rn Eu
rope NW Eu
rope
Easte rn Eu
rope
Unrelated Donor Searches: Results based on patient Ancestry
CB extends transplant access to patients of ethnic “minorities”
Barker et al, BBMT 2010; 16(11):1541-1548
21
Search, Evaluation and Acquisition of CBU for
unrelated transplantation
Well trained, dedicated transplant search coordinators
Clear, step-by-step procedures for search, evaluation and CBU selection for transplant
Communication between search coordinators, clinical teams and Stem Cell Lab
TNC dose; CD34+ cell dose and viability, CFU assays
Quality - Potency of CBU
Interaction of TNC - HLA match
Allele level matching (HLA-A, -B, -C, -DRB1) Selection of CBU with permissible mismatches
Patient - CBU HLA match level
CBU quality post-thaw
Standardization of banking practices
CBU stability studies and segment evaluation
Other CBU characteristics - Banking aspects RBC depletion - final hematocrit
Cryopreservation volume/bag, storage time
CBU selection for unrelated transplantation:
considerations
Other immunological considerations
Variable (N) N (%) < 75% CD34+ Viability Univariate p value Multivariate p value
FACT accreditation at unit collection
Yes (n = 259) 8 (3%)
< 0.001 < 0.001
No (n = 143) 25 (18%)
Year of cryopreservation
1997 – 2004 (n = 119) 17 (14%)
0.008 NS
2005 – 2012 (n = 283) 16 (6%)
Cryo. volume (ml)
< 24.0 (n = 10) 3 (30%)
< 0.001 0.001
24.0 – 26.0 (n = 302) 10 (3%)
26.1 – 30.0 (n = 35) 5 (14%)
> 30.0 (n = 55) 15 (27%)
Processing method
Manual (n = 188) 24 (13%)
0.002 0.010
Automated +
semi-automated (n = 214) 9 (7%)
Method for CBU preparation for infusion: wash or albumin dilution – final volume validated method
Post-thaw evaluation studies
National Cord Blood Program:
Collections - Rodica Ciubotariu, MD, PhD Quality Control - Susana Albano, PhD
IT Systems - Michal Tarnawski, MD Manufacturing - Ludy Dobrila, PhD
Medical Director - Andromachi Scaradavou, MD Program Director - Pablo Rubinstein, MD