Case 2:14-cv ER Document 21 Filed 09/08/14 Page 1 of 24 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Defendant HM Casualty Insurance Company is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and maintaining its principal place of business

Defendants have infringed and are infringing at least claim 12 of the ’420 Patent by importing into the United States and/or by using, offering to sell, and/or selling in the United

KCKCC responded by claiming that it offered an adequate pre-termination process. KCKCC claims its pre-termination process included the opportunity to be heard, the opportunity for

To the extent that Butler’s bad faith claim is based on 42 Pa. § 8371, Scottsdale argues that the applicable two-year limitations period bars this action because Scottsdale

Shamonsky’s complaint alleges that “Defendants’ agent promised Shamonsky that she could finish the nursing program if she went for testing.” Given Saint Luke’s written policy

plaintiff’s commissions on the book of business, therefore, is at least $4.2 million. Plaintiff contends, however, that the amount in controversy is determined at the time of

It is undisputed that Plaintiff was bitten by Defendant’s dog. Thus, the first two elements of Plaintiff’s case are satisfied. It is also undisputed that Plaintiff was invited

A fair reading of the Complaint, the Amended Complaints, and the attachments, indicates that Plaintiffs may have a claim against the Pennsylvania State Police for the use of