• No results found

Enterprise Grants Management]

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Enterprise Grants Management]"

Copied!
30
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

]

Enterprise Grants Management

Gary Thomas

IT Director of SAP Services

Jill Stewart

SAP Business Architect

(2)

[

Agenda

Introduction

Business Need

NCDOT Grant Administration

Business Process Overview

System Architecture

Business Value

(3)

[

North Carolina Transportation

Statewide Infrastructure

 78,000 Miles Of Highway Roadway  12,712 Bridges

 74 Public Airports

 Public Transportation In All 100 Counties

 2 Major Passenger Train Routes  Statewide Bicycle Routes

 8 Coastal Ferry Service Routes  2 International Shipping Ports

(4)

[

SAP Footprint

SAP Live since 2003

6,000 Users

Complex Landscape

 SAP ECC 6.0

 SAP CRM 7.0

 SAP NetWeaver 7.1

 EP (Intranet and Extranet Portals)

 BI (BW, BobJ, Xceslius, Crystal, Bex)

 PI (Interfaces and Web Services)

(5)

[

Business Need

NCDOT administers $1 Billion in grant funding annually

 Federal funding for NCDOT as recipient

 Federal funding where NCDOT acts as pass-through agency  State funding administered by NCDOT

Custom Federal Aid Billing module developed with initial

installation of SAP in 2003 (Grantee Processes)

Paper-based process for administration of constituent grant

funding (Grantor Processes)

(6)

[

Business Requirements

System-enable grant processing

 Program tracking

 Applications

 Award agreements and claims  Grant budgets and balances

Modernize form generation and communications

Streamline business processes

Web-enable grant activities for recipients

 Application submission

 Award status

(7)

[

IT Requirements

Leverage existing financial processes

 ECC financial and cost accounting

 Federal billing and expenditure splitting  Payment processing

Leverage existing infrastructure

 ERP Business Suite (including CRM)  Business Warehouse/Business

Intelligence

 Enterprise Portal

Leverage existing labor pool

 IT support staff

 Supplemental contract resources

Financial Processes

Existing Infrastructure

(8)

[

What is Grants Management?

State as Grantor

Publish Grant Programs

Receive and Assess

Applications

Award Grants

Process Claims

Make Payments

Monitor Grant Projects

Audit

State as Grantee

Notification of

Opportunities

Complete Applications

Receive Award

Bill Granting Agency

Receive Payment

Submit Progress

(9)
(10)

[

Program Management

System manages grants by program

 Manage program budget

 Track application status  Monitor agreements  Program audits

 Reporting and data analysis

Programs grouped by business area

 Similar business logic

 Address same external user base  Organizational structure alignment

(11)

[

Online Presence

Grant Recipients Access Grants Online

 Grant Application Submission

 Award Status

 Invoice Submission  Program Tracking

(12)

[

Process Improvements

Modern Communication Methods

 Email Notifications

 Adobe Interactive Forms

 Electronic and Scanned Document Upload  Online Help

Auto-populate Business Partner Data

Leverage Data in Downstream Processes

Case Management

Integrated Reporting

 Audit Support

(13)
(14)
(15)
(16)
(17)
(18)
(19)
(20)
(21)

[

System Integration

Vendor/BP

General Ledger

Fund

Budget/Commitment

Billing/Payment

Account Assignment

BP

Expense Types

Funding Source

Agreement

Claim

Object Validation

Funded Program

Grantor Program

(22)

[

Project Approach

First wave – 2 business units (April 2011)

 8 months, $750,000

 10 in-house staff (part-time)

 2 supplemental contract resources

Second wave – 1 business unit (April 2012)

 6 months, $200,000

 No supplemental staffing

(23)

[

Business Value

Improved Transparency and Auditability of Grant

Program Activities

Controlled Unallowable Costs Up Front

 Enabled Controls to Ensure Each Grant Spent in Accordance with Federal Guidelines

 Minimized Audit Concerns

Streamlined Activities from Proposal to Closeout

Reduced Application Cycle Time by 50%

(24)

[

Shared Services

NCDOT has history of shared SAP services within

State of NC

 Department of Public Instruction (Plant Maintenance and Inventory)

 State Highway Patrol (Plant Maintenance)  State Port Authority (Financials and Assets)  Global TransPark (Financials)

 Department of Agriculture (Accounts Receivable)

State of NC looking to consolidate systems

 Grants Management part of initial effort

 Focus on reuse of existing business processes

(25)

[

Statewide Opportunity

Cost per transaction

ROI

$

(26)

[

Enterprise Grants Management

Interagency agreement defines scope and terms of services

Implementation projects roll out functionality in phases

 Standardized Processes

 Financial integration

 80/20 Template as basis for additional business processes

 Organizational Alignment

 Statewide Support Structure

 Skill Development

 Customer Satisfaction

User group governs system changes and

future direction

(27)

[

Tighter budget control over grants Ability to leverage best practice Long-term sustainability Improved information security Reduced incidence of fraud Faster return on investment

Lower overall cost due to leveraged assets Ease of auditability Improved analysis across programs

Reduced training cost Consolidated systems Reduced support cost Reduced support cost

Improved service levels

Benefits of Consolidation

Common Reporting Common Process

Model

Common Platform &

(28)

[

Key Learning Points

High-level Grant process overview

Use of adaptive technology

 Emails

 Case management  PDF forms

 Attachments

Grantor Management (CRM) integration with ECC processes

and master data synchronization

(29)

[

Wrap Up

Gary Thomas – IT Director of SAP Services

gthomas@ncdot.gov

Jill Stewart – SAP Business Architect

jestewart@ncdot.gov

Manoj Pandya – SAP Consultant

mpandya@ndssap.com

(30)

[

Thank you for participating.

References

Related documents

Even though BTYD models tend to perform well in predicting transaction frequency, amount and timing of individual customers as well as customer lifetime, they sometimes

A layer-2 domain consists of many servers, which are divided into subnets, i.e., Virtual Local Area Network (VLANs), and each subnet contains up to a few hundred

b) Suppression Type: Principal component analysis might give interpretable results for some data sets. In this case the influences can be adjusted for “irrelevant” parts not

In order to detect weaknesses in the company and propose suggestions for improvement that might move it towards greater prosperity, the performance assessment , using

Any rational dominant party should consequently seek to use state power to reshape the ADP curve in a way which enhances a peak close to its own policy position and thins out

The salience and importance of different risk facets will be contingent on the sources of uncertainty in a specific decision (consumption) situation; most importantly here—in

This study used a multimethod approach to evaluate the relationship of alexithymia (measured by the 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale, and 30-item Emotion Awareness Questionnaire),

• A panel of entrepreneurs and business men/women for your school’s students or community youth group.... Program Components