• No results found

A Guide to Structural Waterproofing

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "A Guide to Structural Waterproofing"

Copied!
28
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

1 © 2012 W. R. Grace & Co | Benjamin J. Brooks

A Guide to Structural

Waterproofing

Part One

Waterproofing Protection For

Below Ground Structures

(2)

2 © 2012 W.R. Grace & Co.

Grace Around The World

Reference Material

Waterproofing Strategies

System Selection

Detailing & Workmanship

Summary

Questions

(3)

3 © 2012 W. R. Grace & Co | Benjamin J. Brooks

Global Headquarters

Columbia, MD, USA

2 2 2 5 2 5 2 4 4 2

Grace Around the World

Highlights

Operations in Over 40 Countries

Leading specialty chemical and materials company

Founded in 1854

Approximately 6,000 employees with $3bn turnover

Global headquarters Key offices

Regional headquarters 93 manufacturing sites 44 R&D/Tech Service sites

UK Headquarters

(4)

4 © 2012 W. R. Grace & Co.

Reference Material

BS8102:2009: Code

of Practice for

Protection of Below

Ground Structures

against. Water from

the Ground

 BS8102 gives recommendations and provides guidance of methods of dealing with and preventing the entry of water from surrounding ground into a structure below ground level.

Institution of Civil

Engineers (ICE):

Reducing the Risk

of Leaking

Substructure a

Clients Guide

• An ICE client guide explaining

substructure waterproofing issues and the risks associated with waterproofing

(5)

5 © 2012 W. R. Grace & Co.

STRUCTURAL WATERPROOFING

Waterproofing

Strategy

• Design Flow Chart

• Design Team

• Clients Requirements

• Desk Study

• Risk Assessment

• Consequences of Failure

The Waterproofing Strategies

(6)

6 © 2012 W. R. Grace & Co.

Design Flow Chart

Assess the risks from

external environment, then

adopt a waterproofing

strategy capable of

achieving client’s

requirements

• Early inclusion of waterproofing specialist

• Clear understanding of clients requirements and expectations • Develop strategy and select

waterproofing system as part of overall robust Initial Information Design Philosophy •Design Team Site Evaluation •Desk Study •Risk Assessment •Water table Classification

Review of Structure •Type (e.g.. New or Existing?)

•Intended use •Foundation form and design

•Construction Methodology

Structural Design Considerations

Selection of type A, B or C Waterproofing Protection Is combined Protection Necessary?

Has Buildability been considered? Has repairability been addressed?

Yes

No

(7)

7 © 2012 W. R. Grace & Co.

Design Team

Note: The waterproofing specialist could be the manufacturer or material supplier, provided that the manufacturer/supplier has the relevant expertise

BS8102:2009 clause 4.2

STRUCTURAL WATERPROOFING

A waterproofing

specialist should be

included as part of

the design team so

that an integrated

waterproofing

solution is created.

The waterproofing specialist should: • Be suitably experienced;

• Be capable of devising solutions that accommodate various projects

constraints and needs;

• Provide the design team with information and guidance that assists with and influences the design, installation and future maintenance of the waterproofed structure

(8)

8 © 2012 W. R. Grace & Co | Benjamin J. Brooks

Clients Requirements

Does the client understand the

difference between wet; damp;

dry?

Have the costs associated with

achieving a DRY basement

been considered?

What are the consequences of

failure?

Has the future use of the

building been discussed?

(9)

9 © 2012 W. R. Grace & Co | Benjamin J. Brooks

Site Evaluation - Desk Study

Hydrostatic head, water table

and perched water table

Local topography, soil type,

contaminates, gas

Missing information obtained

by physical site investigation

BS8102:2009 5.1.1

(10)

10 © 2012 W. R. Grace & Co | Benjamin J. Brooks

Site Evaluation – Risk Assessment

Long term water pressures

Affects of surface water

infiltration

Use of external drainage

Effects of climate change,

burst water mains sewers.

Effects of drainage on existing

neighbouring structures

Effects of gas or contaminates

(11)

11 © 2012 W. R. Grace & Co | Benjamin J. Brooks

For variable or non free draining strata the classification is considered as high

BS8102:2009 Water Table Classification

Low

Variable

High

Where the water table fluctuates Permanently above underside of the base slab

Permanently below underside of the base slab in free draining strata.

(12)

12 © 2012 W. R. Grace & Co.

Potential

Water Ingress

• Ingress may occur from more sources than just

groundwater.

(13)

13 © 2012 W. R. Grace & Co.

STRUCTURAL WATERPROOFING

Consequences

of Failure

• Disputes costs, legal fees

• Private or public property damage liability

• Endangerment of building operative or public from damage to electrical equipment

• Damage to archives, stored goods or plant • Loss of rent

• Reduction in value of property

• Damage to reputation of landlord/developer • Facility, business disruption

• Lack of access/utility of basement areas

• Costs of remedial work and operational delays

Consequences of Failure

(14)

14 © 2012 W. R. Grace & Co.

Waterproofing

System

Selection

• BS 8102:2009 Basement Grades

• BS 8102:2009 Protection Types

• Water Migration

• Guidance on Combined Systems

Waterproofing System Selection

(15)

15 © 2012 W. R. Grace & Co | Benjamin J. Brooks

Grade 1 Basic Utility

Car parking ; plant rooms (excluding electrical equipment); workshops

Grade 2 Better Utility

Plant Rooms and Workshops

requiring drier environment than grade1

Grade 3 Habitable

Ventilated residential and commercial areas inc. offices, restaurants; leisure centers

Basement Grades - BS 8102: 2009

Wet

Damp

(16)

16 © 2012 W. R. Grace & Co | Benjamin J. Brooks

Protection Types

Barrier

Physical Barrier.

 Fully Bonded Membranes, Loose Laid Geosynthetic Clay Liners

 Cementitious Renders, Liquid Waterproofing Systems

Drained Protection

Cavity Drain

 Preformed Cavity formers

 Designed Open Cavity Structural Integral Protection by Design

 Admixures, Controlled Crack Width Design

 Sheet Pilling (may need further protection)

A

B

C

Apart from managing the risks, it is important to understand the waterproofing options available; each method will have cost and space implications for the basement scheme (ICE) REDUCING THE RISK OF LEAKING SUBSTRUCTURE A CLIENTS GUIDE

(17)

17 © 2012 W. R. Grace & Co | Benjamin J. Brooks

 Applied prior to placing of structural concrete

 Full and intimate bond

 Eliminates water migration vertically & horizontally

 Suitable for alkaline soil conditions

 Unaffected by wet dry cycling

Pre-Applied Bonded

Membranes

 Full & intimate bond vertically

 Eliminates water migration vertically

 Some can be suitable as gas protection

 Some can be used in alkaline soil conditions

Bonded Sheet

Membranes

 Designed for negative water pressure

 Eliminates water migration vertically

 Good as solution to complex details

 Ideal as remedial solution

Cementitious

Coatings

Typical Type A Solutions

Typical Type A Solutions

(18)

18 © 2012 W. R. Grace & Co.

Water Migration

(19)

19 © 2012 W. R. Grace & Co | Benjamin J. Brooks

 Must be applied in three coats

 Dated technology that requires heat

 Can become brittle with age

Mastic Asphalt

 Mechanical key to concrete

 Does not resist water migration

Mechanical Key

Membranes

 Mechanical key to

concrete Does not resist water migration

 Not suitable for alkaline ground

 Wet/dry cycling?

Bentonite Carpets

Typical Type A Solutions

Typical Type A Solutions

(20)

20 © 2012 W. R. Grace & Co | Benjamin J. Brooks

 Controlled crack width

 Additional protection may be needed

 Can be cost prohibitive due to steel content

Structural Design

 Requires proper curing of the in-situ concrete.

 No requirement for vapour barrier

 QSRMC/BSI accredited ready-mix supplier.

 Should be considered as part of a system that includes water stops

Concrete Design with

Admixture

 Additional protection may be needed

 Relies on workmanship

 Can be used as part of a redundant post injection system.

Sheet Piled wall

Typical Type B Solutions

Typical Type B Solutions

(21)

21 © 2012 W. R. Grace & Co | Benjamin J. Brooks

Typical Type C Solutions

Drained Cavity

Open Cavity Design

Installed internally after construction of basement.

No hydrostatic pressure on sheets designed more minor seepage.

Installed after basement construction

Does not prevent vapour transmission

(22)

22 © 2012 W. R. Grace & Co | Benjamin J. Brooks

Combined Solutions

STRUCTURAL WATERPROOFING

Use of

Combined

Protection

Systems

Reduces Risk

• Consider combining multiple systems of

waterproofing where:

• Assessed external risks are high

• Consequences of failure to achieve

desired internal environment are

high.

(23)

23 © 2012 W. R. Grace & Co.

Detailing

Detailing -

Adopt a

Simple

Approach

• Involve the waterproofing specialist

for advice

• Ensure continuity with above ground

DPC/building envelope.

• Consider buildability and order of

works.

(24)

24 © 2012 W. R. Grace & Co | Benjamin J. Brooks

STRUCTURAL WATERPROOFING

Quality

Waterproofing

Demands

Teamwork

• Potential risks identified in the

waterproofing strategy should be

understood by the whole team.

• Changes to sequence of works

will have a major impact on

waterproofing integrity.

• Ensure the contractor has the

prerequisite experience to install

the chosen system

(25)

25 © 2012 W.R. Grace & Co.

Systems Summary

Basement Grades - BS8102

Grade 1 - Wet

Grade 2 - Damp

Grade 3 – Dry

Protection Types

Type A – Barrier

Type B – Structural Integral

Type C – Drained Cavity

Look for Materials that limit water

migration.

Consider combined systems where

the risks & consequences of failure

are high

(26)

26 © 2012 W. R. Grace & Co | Benjamin J. Brooks

Successful protection Waterproofing Protection For Below Ground Structures relies on these three elements.

Summary

System Choice

Workmanship

Design

Substructure Protection

(27)

27 © 2012 W. R. Grace & Co.

Questions

Any Questions?

(28)

28 © 2012 W. R. Grace & Co | Benjamin J. Brooks

For additional information, please visit

www.prepufe.com

or contact:

[email protected]

References

Related documents

 National Technical Approval as a crack-bridging, mineral waterproofing grout for the production of building waterproofing according to Construction Product List A, part 2, serial

A basic understanding of Basement Waterproofing in Existing Buildings Basement Waterproofing is the term that describes methods used to prevent water entering rooms that are

The Adams Township School District will have employees complete a questionnaire covering the signs and symptoms of COVID-19 and their exposure to people with suspected or

Health & Beauty Men's Haircut and Shave Revised Health & Beauty Nutrition & Vitamin Store Keep. Health & Beauty

Através dos dados acima mencionados, em conjunto com informações troposféricas (temperatura, vento, umidade específica) e de superfície (evaporação), foi avaliado para o

Facebook Group: Indian Administrative Service ( Raz Kr)... Facebook Group: Indian Administrative Service (

Ceteris paribus,* the context suggests that demand for air travel on major airlines has been severely hit by changes in tastes and preferences and incomes related to 3 major

RP 578 also provides guidelines for material control and material verification programs on ferrous and non-ferrous alloys of new and existing systems specifically covered by B 31.3