• No results found

Existence of solutions for a nonlinear elliptic Dirichlet boundary value problem with an inverse square potential

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Existence of solutions for a nonlinear elliptic Dirichlet boundary value problem with an inverse square potential"

Copied!
7
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

DIRICHLET BOUNDARY VALUE PROBLEM WITH

AN INVERSE SQUARE POTENTIAL

SHENGHUA WENG AND YONGQING LI

Received 11 January 2006; Accepted 24 March 2006

Via the linking theorem, the existence of nontrivial solutions for a nonlinear elliptic Dir-ichlet boundary value problem with an inverse square potential is proved.

Copyright © 2006 S. Weng and Y. Li. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

1. Introduction

This paper is concerned with the existence of nontrivial solutions to the following prob-lem:

−u− μ

|x|2u= |u|

p−2u+λu inΩ\ {0},

u(x)=0 onΩ,

(1.1)

where 0ΩRN (N3) is a bounded domain with smooth boundary, 0μ < μ=

((N−2)/2)2, andμis the best constant in the Hardy inequality:

C

RN u2 |x|2dx≤

RN|∇u|

2dx (1.2)

(cf. [3, Lemma 2.1]), 2< p <2, where 2∗=2N/(N−2) is the so-called critical Sobolev exponent andλ >0 is a parameter.

Finally, inTheorem 1.3we prove, for smallλ >0, the existence of a solution to

−u− μ |x|2u=u

p−1+λu inΩ\ {0},

u(x)>0 inΩ\ {0}, u(x)=0 onΩ.

(1.3)

Hindawi Publishing Corporation Boundary Value Problems

(2)

In the caseμ=0, problem (1.1) has been studied extensively. For example, whenp= 2, Capozzi et al. [1] have shown that (1.1) has at least one positive solution forN≥ 5. When 2< p <2, the existence of positive solutions of (1.1) has been shown in [5, Chapter 1].

Our results are the following.

Theorem1.1. Let0ΩRN(N3)be an open bounded domain. If0μ < μ, then for

anyλ >0, problem (1.1) possesses a nontrivial solution.

Remark 1.2. We mention that whenp=2, the existence of nontrivial solutions of (1.1) has been proved in [2, Theorem 1.3].

Theorem1.3. Let0ΩRN (N3)be an open bounded domain. If0μ <μ, prob-¯

lem (1.3) has a positive solution for0< λ < λ1, whereλ1 denotes the first eigenvalue of the operator− −μ/|x|2.

This paper is organized as follows. InSection 2, we give some preliminaries.Section 3 is devoted to the proof ofTheorem 1.1. The proof ofTheorem 1.3is contained inSection 4.

2. Notations and preliminaries

Throughout this paper,c,ciwill denote various positive constants whose exact values are

not important.H1

0(Ω) will be denoted as the standard Sobolev space, whose norm · is deduced by the standard inner product. By| · |p, we denote the norm ofLp(Ω). All

integrals are taken overΩunless stated otherwise. OnH1

0(Ω), we use the norm

u 2

μ= |∇u|2

μ |x|2u

2

dx. (2.1)

It follows from the Hardy inequality that the norm · μis equivalent to the usual norm

· ofH1

0(Ω).H01(Ω) with the norm · μis simply denoted byH.

By using the critical point theory, we define the action function onH:

(u)=12 |∇u|2|x|μ2u 2

dx−1

p

|u|pdxλ

2

|u|2dx. (2.2)

It is well known that a weak solutionu∈H1

0(Ω) of (1.1) is precisely a critical point of.

That is,

(u),ϕ

= ∇u∇ϕ−|x|μ2

dx−

|u|p−2

uϕdx−λ

uϕdx=0 (2.3)

(3)

Definition 2.1(see [6, Definition 1.16]). Letc∈R, letEbe a Banach space, and letI∈ C1(E,R). Say thatIsatisfies (PS)

ccondition if any sequence{un}inEsuch thatI(un)→c

and I(un) E−10 has a convergent subsequence. If this holds for everyc∈R,Isatisfies (PS) condition.

Now we will prove thatsatisfies (PS) condition, which is contained in the following

two lemmas.

Lemma2.2. If0≤μ < μ=((N−2)/2)2, then any sequence{u

n} ⊂H01(Ω)satisfying

un

−→c, Jμun

−→0, n−→ ∞, (2.4)

is bounded inH01(Ω). Proof. Since un =1 2 ∇un 2 μ

|x|2u 2

n

dx−1

p

un pdx−λ2

un 2 dx, un

,ϕ= ∇un∇ϕ−|x|μ2unϕ

dx− un p−2unϕdx−λ

unϕdx.

(2.5)

Choose 2< q < p, and letϕ=unin (2.5). Fornlarge enough,

c+ 1 +o(1)unμ

≥Jμ

un 1 q un ,un

= 1 2 1 q

un2μ+

1 q− 1 p

un pdx+

1 q− 1 2

λ un 2dx

1 2 1 q un 2 μ+ 1 q− 1 p

un pdx+

1

q− 1 2

λCun

2

μ.

(2.6)

It follows fromp >2 that{un}is bounded inH01(Ω).

Lemma2.3. Under the assumption ofLemma 2.2,{un}possesses a convergent subsequence

inH.

Proof. ByLemma 2.2, going if necessary to a subsequence, we can assume that

unu inH,

un−→u inLr(Ω) for 1≤r <2∗. (2.7)

Let f(u)= |u|p−2u, [5, Theorem A.2] implies that f(u

n) f(u) inLs, wheres=r/(r−

1). Observe that

unu2

μ=

Jμun−J

μ(u),un−u

+ fun−f(u)un−u+λun−u2

dx.

(4)

It is clear that

Jμun

−Jμ(u),un−u

−→0, n−→ ∞. (2.9)

It follows from the H¨older inequality that

fun−f(u)un−udx≤ fun−f(u) r/(r−1) un−u r−→0, n−→ ∞.

(2.10)

Thus we have proved that un−u μ→0,n→ ∞.

3. Proof ofTheorem 1.1

In this section, we will proveTheorem 1.1via the following linking theorem from Rabi-nowitz [5, Theorem 5.3] (see also [6]).

Proposition3.1. LetEbe a Banach space withE=Y⊕X, where dimY <∞. Suppose that I∈C1(E,R)and satisfies that

(i)there existρ,α >0such thatI|∂BρX≥α;

(ii)there existe∈∂B1XandR > ρsuch that ifQ≡(BρY)⊕ {re; 0< r < R}, then

I|∂Q≤0.

IfIsatisfies (PS)ccondition with

c=inf

h∈Γmaxu∈QI

h(u), (3.1)

where

Γ=h∈C(Q,E);h|∂Q=id

, (3.2)

thencis a critical value ofIandc≥α.

Remark 3.2(see [5, Remark 5.5(iii)]). SupposeI|Y≤0 and there are ane∈∂B1

Xand

T > ρsuch that I(u)0 foru∈Y⊕span{e}and u ≥T, then for any largeT,Q= (

Y)⊕ {te; 0< t < T}satisfiesI|∂Q≤0.

To continue our discussion, we may assume that there isk such thatλk≤λ < λk+1,

whereλk is thekth eigenvalue of the operator (− −μ/|x|2) with Dirichlet boundary

condition (see [2,4]). Let

Y:=Yk=span

φ1,φ2,...,φk

, (3.3)

hereφidenotes the eigenfunction corresponding toλi. DecomposeH01(Ω)=Y⊕X(where Xis the topological complement ofYinH01(Ω)). For anyy∈Y, we have that

∇y 2 μ |x|2y

2 dx≤λk

y2dx, (3.4)

∇u 2 μ |x|2u

2

dx≥λk+1

u2dx for anyu X. (3.5)

(5)

Proposition3.3. There existρ,α >0such thatJμ|∂BρX≥α.

Proof. For anyu∈X,λk≤λ < λk+1, we obtain from (3.5) and Sobolev inequality that

(u)=12 |∇u|2|x|μ2u 2

dx−1

p

|u|pdxλ

2

|u|2dx

1 2

λk+1−λ

λk+1 |∇u|

2 μ |x|2u

2

dx−1 p

|u|pdx

1 2

λk+1−λ λk+1 u

2

μ−c u μp.

(3.6)

Then we can choose u μ=ρsufficiently small andα >0 such thatJμ|∂BρX≥α.

Proposition3.4. Jμverifies (ii) ofProposition 3.1.

Proof. First, for anyy∈Y, we obtain from (3.4) that

(y)=12 |∇y|2|x|μ2y 2

dx−1

p

|y|pdxλ

2

|y|2dx

1 2

λk−λ

λk |∇y|

2 μ |x|2y

2dx1 p

|y|pdx

=1 2

λk−λ

λk y

2

μ−

1 p|y|

p p.

(3.7)

Thus(y)0 since all norms are equivalent onY. Lete:=φk+1be the (k+ 1)th eigen-function of (− −μ/|x|2), since for anyyY,

y+tφk+1

−→ −∞ ast−→ ∞. (3.8)

It follows fromRemark 3.2that we can takeTsufficiently large and defineQ=(BTY)

{re; 0< t < T}such thatProposition 3.4holds.

The proof in the case ofc≥αis the same as in the proof of [5, Theorem 5.3], by now we have completed the proof ofTheorem 1.1.

4. Proof ofTheorem 1.3

In this section, we will proveTheorem 1.3. Here we define the following Euler-Lagrange functional of (1.3) onH:

(u)=12 |∇u|2|x|μ2u 2

dx−1

p u

+p dx−λ

2 u

+2

dx, (4.1)

whereu+=max{u, 0}, and for anyϕC 0(Ω),

(u),ϕ

= ∇u∇ϕ− μ |x|2

dx− u+p−1ϕdx−λ u+ϕdx. (4.2)

By using the same method in the proof ofTheorem 1.1, we obtain that satisfies (PS)

(6)

It is easy to check that(u)∈C1(H01(Ω),R), we will verify the assumptions of the mountain pass theorem. By the Sobolev theorem, there existsc1>0, such that foru∈ H, u Lp(Ω)≤c1 u μ. Hence we have

(u)=12 |∇u|2|x|μ2u 2

dx−1

p u

+pdxλ

2 u

+2dx

1 2 u

2

μ−

c1 p u

p μ− λ

2λ1 u 2

μ

=1 2

1 λ λ1

u 2

μ−c

1 p u

p μ.

(4.3)

So there isr >0 such that

b:= inf

u μ=r

(u)>0=Jμ(0). (4.4)

Letu∈Hwithu >0 onΩ, we have, fort≥0,

(tu)=t

2

2 |∇u|

2 μ |x|2u

2

dx−tp p

(u+)pdxλt2

2 u

+2dx. (4.5)

Since p >2, there existse:=tu, such that e μ> r and(e)0. By the mountain pass

theorem,has a positive critical value, and problem

−u− μ |x|2u=

u+p−1+λu+ inΩ\ {0},

u∈H01(Ω)

(4.6)

has a nontrivial solutionu. Multiplying the equation byu−and integrating overΩ, we find

0= ∇u− 2 μ |x|2

u−2

dx= u− 2

μ. (4.7)

Henceu−=0, that is, u≥0. A standard elliptic regularity argument implies thatu∈ C2(Ω\ {0}), in which case, by the strong maximum principle,uis positive, thus is the solution of problem (1.3).

Acknowledgments

(7)

References

[1] A. Capozzi, D. Fortunato, and G. Palmieri,An existence result for nonlinear elliptic problems in-volving critical Sobolev exponent, Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincar´e. Analyse Non Lin´eaire2

(1985), no. 6, 463–470.

[2] J. Chen,Existence of solutions for a nonlinear PDE with an inverse square potential, Journal of Differential Equations195(2003), no. 2, 497–519.

[3] J. P. Garc´ıa Azorero and I. Peral Alonso,Hardy inequalities and some critical elliptic and parabolic problems, Journal of Differential Equations144(1998), no. 2, 441–476.

[4] E. Jannelli,The role played by space dimension in elliptic critical problems, Journal of Differential Equations156(1999), no. 2, 407–426.

[5] P. H. Rabinowitz,Minimax Methods in Critical Point Theory with Applications to Differential Equations, CBMS Regional Conference Series in Mathematics, vol. 65, American Mathematical Society, Rhode Island, 1986.

[6] M. Willem,Minimax Theorems, Progress in Nonlinear Differential Equations and Their Appli-cations, 24, Birkh¨auser Boston, Massachusetts, 1996.

Shenghua Weng: Department of Mathematics, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou 350007, China E-mail address:[email protected]

References

Related documents