DIRICHLET BOUNDARY VALUE PROBLEM WITH
AN INVERSE SQUARE POTENTIAL
SHENGHUA WENG AND YONGQING LI
Received 11 January 2006; Accepted 24 March 2006
Via the linking theorem, the existence of nontrivial solutions for a nonlinear elliptic Dir-ichlet boundary value problem with an inverse square potential is proved.
Copyright © 2006 S. Weng and Y. Li. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Introduction
This paper is concerned with the existence of nontrivial solutions to the following prob-lem:
−u− μ
|x|2u= |u|
p−2u+λu inΩ\ {0},
u(x)=0 on∂Ω,
(1.1)
where 0∈Ω⊂RN (N≥3) is a bounded domain with smooth boundary, 0≤μ < μ=
((N−2)/2)2, andμis the best constant in the Hardy inequality:
C
RN u2 |x|2dx≤
RN|∇u|
2dx (1.2)
(cf. [3, Lemma 2.1]), 2< p <2∗, where 2∗=2N/(N−2) is the so-called critical Sobolev exponent andλ >0 is a parameter.
Finally, inTheorem 1.3we prove, for smallλ >0, the existence of a solution to
−u− μ |x|2u=u
p−1+λu inΩ\ {0},
u(x)>0 inΩ\ {0}, u(x)=0 on∂Ω.
(1.3)
Hindawi Publishing Corporation Boundary Value Problems
In the caseμ=0, problem (1.1) has been studied extensively. For example, whenp= 2∗, Capozzi et al. [1] have shown that (1.1) has at least one positive solution forN≥ 5. When 2< p <2∗, the existence of positive solutions of (1.1) has been shown in [5, Chapter 1].
Our results are the following.
Theorem1.1. Let0∈Ω⊂RN(N≥3)be an open bounded domain. If0≤μ < μ, then for
anyλ >0, problem (1.1) possesses a nontrivial solution.
Remark 1.2. We mention that whenp=2∗, the existence of nontrivial solutions of (1.1) has been proved in [2, Theorem 1.3].
Theorem1.3. Let0∈Ω⊂RN (N≥3)be an open bounded domain. If0≤μ <μ, prob-¯
lem (1.3) has a positive solution for0< λ < λ1, whereλ1 denotes the first eigenvalue of the operator− −μ/|x|2.
This paper is organized as follows. InSection 2, we give some preliminaries.Section 3 is devoted to the proof ofTheorem 1.1. The proof ofTheorem 1.3is contained inSection 4.
2. Notations and preliminaries
Throughout this paper,c,ciwill denote various positive constants whose exact values are
not important.H1
0(Ω) will be denoted as the standard Sobolev space, whose norm · is deduced by the standard inner product. By| · |p, we denote the norm ofLp(Ω). All
integrals are taken overΩunless stated otherwise. OnH1
0(Ω), we use the norm
u 2
μ= |∇u|2−
μ |x|2u
2
dx. (2.1)
It follows from the Hardy inequality that the norm · μis equivalent to the usual norm
· ofH1
0(Ω).H01(Ω) with the norm · μis simply denoted byH.
By using the critical point theory, we define the action function onH:
Jμ(u)=12 |∇u|2−|x|μ2u 2
dx−1
p
|u|pdx−λ
2
|u|2dx. (2.2)
It is well known that a weak solutionu∈H1
0(Ω) of (1.1) is precisely a critical point ofJμ.
That is,
Jμ(u),ϕ
= ∇u∇ϕ−|x|μ2uϕ
dx−
|u|p−2
uϕdx−λ
uϕdx=0 (2.3)
Definition 2.1(see [6, Definition 1.16]). Letc∈R, letEbe a Banach space, and letI∈ C1(E,R). Say thatIsatisfies (PS)
ccondition if any sequence{un}inEsuch thatI(un)→c
and I(un) E−1→0 has a convergent subsequence. If this holds for everyc∈R,Isatisfies (PS) condition.
Now we will prove thatJμsatisfies (PS) condition, which is contained in the following
two lemmas.
Lemma2.2. If0≤μ < μ=((N−2)/2)2, then any sequence{u
n} ⊂H01(Ω)satisfying Jμ
un
−→c, Jμun
−→0, n−→ ∞, (2.4)
is bounded inH01(Ω). Proof. Since Jμ un =1 2 ∇un 2 − μ
|x|2u 2
n
dx−1
p
un pdx−λ2
un 2 dx, Jμ un
,ϕ= ∇un∇ϕ−|x|μ2unϕ
dx− un p−2unϕdx−λ
unϕdx.
(2.5)
Choose 2< q < p, and letϕ=unin (2.5). Fornlarge enough,
c+ 1 +o(1)unμ
≥Jμ
un −1 q Jμ un ,un
= 1 2− 1 q
un2μ+
1 q− 1 p
un pdx+
1 q− 1 2
λ un 2dx
≥1 2− 1 q un 2 μ+ 1 q− 1 p
un pdx+
1
q− 1 2
λCun
2
μ.
(2.6)
It follows fromp >2 that{un}is bounded inH01(Ω).
Lemma2.3. Under the assumption ofLemma 2.2,{un}possesses a convergent subsequence
inH.
Proof. ByLemma 2.2, going if necessary to a subsequence, we can assume that
unu inH,
un−→u inLr(Ω) for 1≤r <2∗. (2.7)
Let f(u)= |u|p−2u, [5, Theorem A.2] implies that f(u
n)→ f(u) inLs, wheres=r/(r−
1). Observe that
un−u2
μ=
Jμun−J
μ(u),un−u
+ fun−f(u)un−u+λun−u2
dx.
It is clear that
Jμun
−Jμ(u),un−u
−→0, n−→ ∞. (2.9)
It follows from the H¨older inequality that
fun−f(u)un−udx≤ fun−f(u) r/(r−1) un−u r−→0, n−→ ∞.
(2.10)
Thus we have proved that un−u μ→0,n→ ∞.
3. Proof ofTheorem 1.1
In this section, we will proveTheorem 1.1via the following linking theorem from Rabi-nowitz [5, Theorem 5.3] (see also [6]).
Proposition3.1. LetEbe a Banach space withE=Y⊕X, where dimY <∞. Suppose that I∈C1(E,R)and satisfies that
(i)there existρ,α >0such thatI|∂BρX≥α;
(ii)there existe∈∂B1XandR > ρsuch that ifQ≡(BρY)⊕ {re; 0< r < R}, then
I|∂Q≤0.
IfIsatisfies (PS)ccondition with
c=inf
h∈Γmaxu∈QI
h(u), (3.1)
where
Γ=h∈C(Q,E);h|∂Q=id
, (3.2)
thencis a critical value ofIandc≥α.
Remark 3.2(see [5, Remark 5.5(iii)]). SupposeI|Y≤0 and there are ane∈∂B1
Xand
T > ρsuch that I(u)≤0 foru∈Y⊕span{e}and u ≥T, then for any largeT,Q= (Bρ
Y)⊕ {te; 0< t < T}satisfiesI|∂Q≤0.
To continue our discussion, we may assume that there isk such thatλk≤λ < λk+1,
whereλk is thekth eigenvalue of the operator (− −μ/|x|2) with Dirichlet boundary
condition (see [2,4]). Let
Y:=Yk=span
φ1,φ2,...,φk
, (3.3)
hereφidenotes the eigenfunction corresponding toλi. DecomposeH01(Ω)=Y⊕X(where Xis the topological complement ofYinH01(Ω)). For anyy∈Y, we have that
∇y 2− μ |x|2y
2 dx≤λk
y2dx, (3.4)
∇u 2− μ |x|2u
2
dx≥λk+1
u2dx for anyu∈ X. (3.5)
Proposition3.3. There existρ,α >0such thatJμ|∂BρX≥α.
Proof. For anyu∈X,λk≤λ < λk+1, we obtain from (3.5) and Sobolev inequality that
Jμ(u)=12 |∇u|2−|x|μ2u 2
dx−1
p
|u|pdx−λ
2
|u|2dx
≥1 2
λk+1−λ
λk+1 |∇u|
2− μ |x|2u
2
dx−1 p
|u|pdx
≥1 2
λk+1−λ λk+1 u
2
μ−c u μp.
(3.6)
Then we can choose u μ=ρsufficiently small andα >0 such thatJμ|∂BρX≥α.
Proposition3.4. Jμverifies (ii) ofProposition 3.1.
Proof. First, for anyy∈Y, we obtain from (3.4) that
Jμ(y)=12 |∇y|2−|x|μ2y 2
dx−1
p
|y|pdx−λ
2
|y|2dx
≤1 2
λk−λ
λk |∇y|
2− μ |x|2y
2dx−1 p
|y|pdx
=1 2
λk−λ
λk y
2
μ−
1 p|y|
p p.
(3.7)
ThusJμ(y)≤0 since all norms are equivalent onY. Lete:=φk+1be the (k+ 1)th eigen-function of (− −μ/|x|2), since for anyy∈Y,
Jμ
y+tφk+1
−→ −∞ ast−→ ∞. (3.8)
It follows fromRemark 3.2that we can takeTsufficiently large and defineQ=(BTY)⊕
{re; 0< t < T}such thatProposition 3.4holds.
The proof in the case ofc≥αis the same as in the proof of [5, Theorem 5.3], by now we have completed the proof ofTheorem 1.1.
4. Proof ofTheorem 1.3
In this section, we will proveTheorem 1.3. Here we define the following Euler-Lagrange functional of (1.3) onH:
Jμ(u)=12 |∇u|2−|x|μ2u 2
dx−1
p u
+p dx−λ
2 u
+2
dx, (4.1)
whereu+=max{u, 0}, and for anyϕ∈C∞ 0(Ω),
Jμ(u),ϕ
= ∇u∇ϕ− μ |x|2uϕ
dx− u+p−1ϕdx−λ u+ϕdx. (4.2)
By using the same method in the proof ofTheorem 1.1, we obtain thatJμ satisfies (PS)
It is easy to check thatJμ(u)∈C1(H01(Ω),R), we will verify the assumptions of the mountain pass theorem. By the Sobolev theorem, there existsc1>0, such that foru∈ H, u Lp(Ω)≤c1 u μ. Hence we have
Jμ(u)=12 |∇u|2−|x|μ2u 2
dx−1
p u
+pdx−λ
2 u
+2dx
≥1 2 u
2
μ−
c1 p u
p μ− λ
2λ1 u 2
μ
=1 2
1− λ λ1
u 2
μ−c
1 p u
p μ.
(4.3)
So there isr >0 such that
b:= inf
u μ=r
Jμ(u)>0=Jμ(0). (4.4)
Letu∈Hwithu >0 onΩ, we have, fort≥0,
Jμ(tu)=t
2
2 |∇u|
2− μ |x|2u
2
dx−tp p
(u+)pdx−λt2
2 u
+2dx. (4.5)
Since p >2, there existse:=tu, such that e μ> r andJμ(e)≤0. By the mountain pass
theorem,Jμhas a positive critical value, and problem
−u− μ |x|2u=
u+p−1+λu+ inΩ\ {0},
u∈H01(Ω)
(4.6)
has a nontrivial solutionu. Multiplying the equation byu−and integrating overΩ, we find
0= ∇u− 2− μ |x|2
u−2
dx= u− 2
μ. (4.7)
Henceu−=0, that is, u≥0. A standard elliptic regularity argument implies thatu∈ C2(Ω\ {0}), in which case, by the strong maximum principle,uis positive, thus is the solution of problem (1.3).
Acknowledgments
References
[1] A. Capozzi, D. Fortunato, and G. Palmieri,An existence result for nonlinear elliptic problems in-volving critical Sobolev exponent, Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincar´e. Analyse Non Lin´eaire2
(1985), no. 6, 463–470.
[2] J. Chen,Existence of solutions for a nonlinear PDE with an inverse square potential, Journal of Differential Equations195(2003), no. 2, 497–519.
[3] J. P. Garc´ıa Azorero and I. Peral Alonso,Hardy inequalities and some critical elliptic and parabolic problems, Journal of Differential Equations144(1998), no. 2, 441–476.
[4] E. Jannelli,The role played by space dimension in elliptic critical problems, Journal of Differential Equations156(1999), no. 2, 407–426.
[5] P. H. Rabinowitz,Minimax Methods in Critical Point Theory with Applications to Differential Equations, CBMS Regional Conference Series in Mathematics, vol. 65, American Mathematical Society, Rhode Island, 1986.
[6] M. Willem,Minimax Theorems, Progress in Nonlinear Differential Equations and Their Appli-cations, 24, Birkh¨auser Boston, Massachusetts, 1996.
Shenghua Weng: Department of Mathematics, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou 350007, China E-mail address:[email protected]