• No results found

Accurate Asymptotic Formulas for Eigenvalues and Eigenfunctions of a Boundary-Value Problem of Fourth Order

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Accurate Asymptotic Formulas for Eigenvalues and Eigenfunctions of a Boundary-Value Problem of Fourth Order"

Copied!
21
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Volume 2010, Article ID 720235,21pages doi:10.1155/2010/720235

Research Article

Accurate Asymptotic Formulas for

Eigenvalues and Eigenfunctions of

a Boundary-Value Problem of Fourth Order

Hamza Menken

Mathematics Department, Science and Arts Faculty, Mersin University, 33343 Mersin, Turkey Correspondence should be addressed to Hamza Menken,[email protected]

Received 7 July 2010; Accepted 9 November 2010

Academic Editor: I. T. Kiguradze

Copyrightq2010 Hamza Menken. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

In the present paper, we consider a nonself-adjoint fourth-order differential operator with the periodic boundary conditions. We compute new accurate asymptotic expression of the fundamental solutions of the given equation. Then, we obtain new accurate asymptotic formulas for eigenvalues and eigenfunctions.

1. Introduction

In the present work, we consider a nonself-adjoint fourth-order operator which is generated by the periodic boundary conditions:

y4qxyλy, 0xπ, 1.1

yj0−yjπ 0, j0,1,2,3, 1.2

where qx is a complex-valued function. Without lose of generality, we can assume that π

0 qxdx0.

Spectral properties of Sturm-Liouville operator which is generated by the periodic and antiperiodic boundary conditions have been investigated by many authors, the results on this direct and references are given details in the monographs1–5.

(2)

using the obtained asymptotic formulas for eigenvalues and eigenfunctions, the basis properties of the root functions of the operators were investigated.

The paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we compute new asymptotic expression of the fundamental solutions of 1.1. In Section 3, we obtain new accurate asymptotic estimates for the eigenvalues. In Section 4, we have asymptotic formulas for eigenfunctions under the distinct conditions onqx.

2. The Expression of the Fundamental Solutions

It is well known thatsee2, page 92if the complexs-planes4 λis divided into eight

sectorsS 0,7, defined by the inequalities

π

8 ≤args

1π

8 ,

0,7, 2.1

then in each of these sectors1.1has four linear independent solutionsykx, s k1,2,3,4,

which are regular with respect tosin the sectorSlfor|s|sufficiently large and which satisfy

the relation

ykx, s eωksx

7

υ0

uv,kx

sv O

1

s8 , k1,2,3,4, 2.2

where the numbersωk are the fourth roots of unity, that is,ω1 −ω4 iandω2 −ω3 1.

In general, the term OsN1at the formula 2.2depends upon the smoothness of the

function qx. If qx has mcontinuous derivatives, then one can assert the existence of a representation2.2withN m3. Here, we assume thatqxC40, π. The functions

uυ,kxsatisfy the following recursion relations:

4uυ,kx 6ω3kuυ1,kx 4ωk2uυ2,kx

ωkuυ43,kx ωkqxuυ−3,kx 0, uυ,kx≡0, υ <0.

2.3

Let us put, moreover, u0,kx ≡ 1, uυ,k0 ≡ 0, for υ ≥ 1. Thus, the functions uυ,kxare

uniquely determined. Thus, we can find from2.3that

u0,kx 1, u1,kx 0, u2,kx 0, u3,kx

1 4ω3

k

x

0

qtdt,

u4,kx

3 8

qxq0, u5,kx

5ω3

k

16

qxq0,

u6,kx

3ω2

k

32

qxq0ω

2

k

32 x

0

qtdt 2

,

u7,kxωk

64

qxq0−3ωk

32

qxq0 x

0

qtdt− 3ωk

32 x

0

q2tdt.

(3)

3. The Asymptotic Formulas of Eigenvalues

It follows from the classical investigations see 4, page 65 that the eigenvalues of the problem1.1,1.2 in0,1 consist of the pairs of the sequences{λk,1},{λk,2} satisfying

the following asymptotic formula:

λk,1λk,2O

k1/2 24

1ξ0

k O

1

k3/2

3.1

for sufficiently large integerk, whereξ0is a constant.

Theorem 3.1. Assume thatqxC40, π. Then, the eigenvalues of the boundary-value problem

1.1,1.2form two infinite sequencesλk,1, λk,2 kN,N1, . . ., whereNis a big positive integer

and have the following asymptotic formulas:

λk,1 2ki4

3 8π

π

0 q2tdt

2ki4 O

1

k8

,

λk,2 2k4

3 8π

π

0 q2tdt

2k4 O

1

k8

.

3.2

Proof. By derivation of2.2up to third order with respect tox, the following relations are obtained:

ykmx, s ωksmeωksx

⎡ ⎣7

υ0

uυ,kmx

O

1

s8

, 3.3

wherek1,2,3,4,m1,2,3 and

u0m,kx 1, u1m,kx 0, u2m,kx 0, u3m,kx − 1

4ω3

k

x

0

qtdt,

u41,kx 1

8qx− 3

8q0, u

2

4,kx

1 8qx

3

8q0, u

3

4,kx

3 8qx

3 8q0,

u51,kx ω

3

k

16q

x 5ω3k

16 q

0, u2

5,kx

3ω3k

16 q

x 5ω3k

16 q 0,

u53,kx ω

3

k

16q

x 5ωk3

(4)

u61,kx −5ω

2

k

32

qx q0ω

2

k

32

x

0

qtdt 2

,

u62,kx −3ω

2

k

32 q

x5ωk2

32 q

0 ω2k

32 x

0

qtdt 2

,

u63,kx 3ω

2

k

32 q

x5ω2k

32 q

0 ωk2

32

x

0

qtdt 2

,

u71,kx 9ωk

64 q

x ωk

64q

0ωk

32

qx−3q0 x

0

qtdt−3ωk

32 x

0

q2tdt,

u72,kxωk

64q

x ωk

64q

0 ωk

32

qx 3q0 x

0

qtdt−3ωk

32 x

0

q2tdt,

u73,kx −7ωk

64 q

x ωk

64q

0 3ωk

32

qx 3q0 x

0

qtdt− 3ωk

32 x

0

q2tdt.

3.4

Now let us substitute all these expressions into the characteristic determinant

Δs

U1

y1

U1

y2

U1

y3

U1

y4

U2

y1

U2

y2

U2

y3

U2

y4

U3

y1

U3

y2

U3

y3

U3

y4

U4

y1

U4

y2

U4

y3

U4

y4

, 3.5

where

Uj1

yk

ykykj0, j0,1,2,3. 3.6

By long computations, for sufficiently large|s|, we obtain that

Δs 16is6

esπ

1−3 2

q0

s4 −

3 32

π

0 q2tdt

s7 O

1

s8

−2

1−3

2

q0

s4 O

1

s8

e

1−3

2

q0

s4

3 32

π

0 q2tdt

s7 O

1

s8

×

eisπ

1− 3i

32 π

0 q2tdt

s7 O

1

s8 −2

1O

1

s8

eisπ

1 3i 32

π

0 q2tdt

s7 O

1

s8 .

(5)

Multiplying the last equation by

esπ

13 2

q0

s4

3 32

π

0 q2tdt

s7 O

1

s8 e

isπ

1 3i

32 π

0 q2tdt

s7 O

1

s8 , 3.8

it becomes

esπ

1 3

32 π

0 q2tdt

s7 O

1

s8

2

eisπ

1 3i 32

π

0 q2tdt

s7 O

1

s8 2

. 3.9

Hence, byΔs 0, for sufficiently large|s|, the following equations hold:

esπ−1 3 32

π

0 q2tdt

s7 O

1

s8

, 3.10

eisπ−1 3i 32

π

0 q2tdt

s7 O

1

s8

. 3.11

By Rouche’s theorem, we have asymptotic estimates for the rootssk,1 andsk,2,k N,N

1, . . . ,of3.10and3.11, respectively, whereNis a big positive integer

sk,12ki

3 32π

π

0 q2tdt

2ki7 O

1

k8

, 3.12

sk,22k 3

32π π

0 q2tdt

2k7 O

1

k8

. 3.13

From the relations3.12,3.13and the relationsλk,j s4k,j,j1,2, the asymptotic formulas

3.2are valid forkN.

4. The Asymptotic Formulas for the Eigenfunctions

Now, we obtain asymptotic formulas for eigenfunctions under the distinct conditions onqx. Case 1. Assume thatqxC10, πand the conditionqπq0/0 holds. Based on the

asymptotic expressions of the fundamental solutions of1.1and the asymptotic formulas for eigenvalues of the boundary-value problem1.1,1.2up to orderOs−5, the following

(6)

Theorem 4.1. If the condition q0/0 holds, then eigenfunctions of the boundary-value problem1.1,1.2corresponding the eigenvaluesλk,1andλk,2are of the form

yk,1x sin2kx−sinh2kx O

1

k

, 4.1

yk,2x cos2kx cosh2kx O

1

k

, 4.2

wherekis sufficiently large integer.

Proof. Let us calculateUj1yυx, sk,1 j0,1,2up to orderOsk,51. Since

esk,1π1 3 32

π

0 q2tdt

s7

k,1

O

1

s8

k,1

, 4.3

we obtain that

U1

yυx, sk,1

3

8

q0 s4

k,1

O

1

s5

k,1

,

U2

yυx, sk,1

ωυsk,1

1 8

q0 s4k,1 O

1

s5k,1 ,

U3

yυx, sk,1

ωυsk,12

−1

8

q0 s4

k,1

O

1

s5

k,1

.

4.4

Follows from the conditionq0/0 thatUj1yυx, sk,1/0 for j 0,1,2. Thus, we

can seek eigenfunctionyk,1xcorrespondingλk,1in the form

yk,1x

y1x, sk,1 y2x, sk,1 y3x, sk,1 y4x, sk,1

U1

y1

U1

y2

U1

y3

U1

y4

U2

y1

U2

y2

U2

y3

U2

y4

U3

y1

U3

y2

U3

y3

U3

y4

. 4.5

Then,

yk,1x y1x, sk,1

U1

y2

U1

y3

U1

y4

U2

y2

U2

y3

U2

y4

U3

y2

U3

y3

U3

y4

y2x, sk,1

U1

y1

U1

y3

U1

y4

U2

y1

U2

y3

U2

y4

U3

y1

U3

y3

U3

y4

(7)

y3x, sk,1 U1 y1 U1 y2 U1 y4 U2 y1 U2 y2 U2 y4 U3 y1 U3 y2 U3 y4

y4x, sk,1

U1 y1 U1 y2 U1 y3 U2 y1 U2 y2 U2 y3 U3 y1 U3 y2 U3 y3 . 4.6

By simple computations, we obtain U1 y2 U1 y3 U1 y4 U2 y2 U2 y3 U3 y4 U3 y2 U3 y3 U3 y4 − 3 27

q03 s9k,1

1O

1

sk,1

, U1 y1 U1 y3 U1 y4 U2 y1 U2 y3 U2 y4 U3 y1 U3 y3 U3 y4 − 3i 27

q03 s9

k,1

1O

1

sk,1

, U1 y1 U1 y2 U1 y4 U2 y1 U2 y2 U2 y4 U3 y1 U3 y2 U3 y4 − 3i 27

q03 s9k,1

1O

1

sk,1

, U1 y1 U1 y2 U1 y3 U2 y1 U2 y2 U2 y3 U3 y1 U3 y2 U3 y3 − 3 27

q03 s9

k,1

1O

1

sk,1

.

4.7

Hence, using the formula2.2, we can write

yk,1x −3

27

q03 s9k,1

eisk,1xiesk,1xiesk,1xeisk,1xO

1

sk,1

−3

27

q03 s9

k,1

2isinsk,1x−2isinhsk,1xO

1

sk,1

−3i

26

q03 s9k,1

sinsk,1x−sinhsk,1xO

1

sk,1

.

4.8

Therefore, for the normalized eigenfunction, we get

yk,1x sinsk,1x−sinhsk,1xO

1

sk,1

(8)

Using the relations3.3and3.12, for sufficiently large integerk, we obtain4.1

yk,1x sin2kx−sinh2kx O

1

k

. 4.10

Similarly, since Uj1yυx, sk,1/0 for j 1,2,3, we can seek eigenfunction yk,2x

correspondingλk,2in the form

yk,2x

y1x, sk,2 y2x, sk,2 y3x, sk,2 y4x, sk,2

U2 y1 U2 y2 U2 y3 U2 y4 U3 y1 U3 y2 U3 y3 U3 y4 U4 y1 U4 y2 U4 y3 U4 y4 . 4.11 Then,

yk,2x y1x, sk,2

U2 y2 U2 y3 U2 y4 U3 y2 U3 y3 U3 y4 U4 y2 U4 y3 U4 y4

y2x, sk,2

U2 y1 U2 y3 U2 y4 U3 y1 U3 y3 U3 y4 U4 y1 U4 y3 U4 y4

y3x, sk,2

U2 y1 U2 y2 U2 y4 U3 y1 U3 y2 U3 y4 U4 y1 U4 y2 U4 y4

y4x, sk,2

U2 y1 U2 y2 U2 y3 U3 y1 U3 y2 U3 y3 U4 y1 U4 y2 U4 y3 . 4.12

By similar computations we obtain U2 y2 U2 y3 U2 y4 U3 y2 U3 y3 U3 y4 U4 y2 U4 y3 U4 y4 3i 27

q03 s6

k,2

1O

1

sk,2

, U2 y1 U2 y3 U2 y4 U3 y1 U3 y3 U3 y4 U4 y1 U4 y3 U4 y4 − 3i 27

q03 s6k,2

1O

1

sk,2

(9)

U2

y1

U2

y2

U2

y4

U3

y1

U3

y2

U3

y4

U4

y1

U4

y2

U4

y4

3i

27

q03 s6

k,2

1O

1

sk,2

,

U2

y1

U2

y2

U2

y3

U3

y1

U3

y2

U3

y3

U4

y1

U4

y2

U4

y3

3i

27

q03 s6k,2

1O

1

sk,2

.

4.13

Hence, using the formula2.2, we can write

yk,2x

3i

27

q03 s6k,2

eisk,2xesk,2xesk,2xeisk,2xO

1

sk,2

3i 27

q03 s6k,2

2 cossk,2x2 coshsk,2xO

1

sk,2

3i 26

q03 s6

k,1

cossk,2xcoshsk,2xO

1

sk,2

.

4.14

Therefore, for the normalized eigenfunction, we get

yk,2x cossk,2xcoshsk,2xO

1

sk,2

. 4.15

Hence, for sufficiently large integerk, we obtain4.2

yk,2x cos2kx cosh2kx O

1

k

. 4.16

Case 2. Assume thatqxC20, πand the conditionsq0 0 andq0/0 hold. Based on the asymptotic expressions of the fundamental solutions of 1.1 and the asymptotic formulas for eigenvalues of the boundary-value problem1.1,1.2up to order

Os−6, the following result is valid.

Theorem 4.2. If the conditionsqπq0 0andqπq0/0hold, then eigenfunctions of the boundary-value problem1.1,1.2corresponding the eigenvaluesλk,1andλk,2are of the form

yk,1x cos2kx−cosh2kx O

1

k

, 4.17

yk,2x sin2kx−sinh2kx O

1

k

, 4.18

(10)

Proof. It is clear that

U1

yυx, sk,1

3

8

q0 s4

k,1

5ωυ

16

q0 s5

k,1

O

1

s6

k,1

,

U2

yυx, sk,1

ωυsk,1

1 8

q0 s4k,1

ωυ

16

q0 s5k,1

O

1

s6

k,1

,

U3

yυx, sk,1

ωυsk,12

−1

8

q0 s4

k,1

−3ωυ

16

q0 s5k,1

O

1

s6k,1 .

4.19

It follows from the conditionsq0 0,q0/0 thatUj1yυx, sk,1/0 for

j0,1,2. Thus, we can seek eigenfunctionyk,1xcorrespondingλk,1in the form

yk,1x

y1x, sk,1 y2x, sk,1 y3x, sk,1 y4x, sk,1

U1

y1

U1

y2

U1

y3

U1

y4

U2

y1

U2

y2

U2

y3

U2

y4

U3

y1

U3

y2

U3

y3

U3

y4

. 4.20

Then,

yk,1x y1x, sk,1

U1

y2

U1

y3

U1

y4

U2

y2

U2

y3

U2

y4

U3

y2

U3

y3

U3

y4

y2x, sk,1

U1

y1

U1

y3

U1

y4

U2

y1

U2

y3

U2

y4

U3

y1

U3

y3

U3

y4

(11)

y3x, sk,1 U1 y1 U1 y2 U1 y4 U2 y1 U2 y2 U2 y4 U3 y1 U3 y2 U3 y4

y4x, sk,1

U1 y1 U1 y2 U1 y3 U2 y1 U2 y2 U2 y3 U3 y1 U3 y2 U3 y3 . 4.21

By simple computations, we have U1 y2 U1 y3 U1 y4 U2 y2 U2 y3 U2 y4 U3 y2 U3 y3 U3 y4 15i 210

q03 s12k,1

1O

1

sk,1

, U1 y1 U1 y3 U1 y4 U2 y1 U3 y3 U2 y4 U3 y1 U3 y3 U3 y4 15i 210

q03 s12

k,1

1O

1

sk,1

, U1 y1 U1 y2 U1 y4 U2 y1 U2 y2 U2 y4 U3 y1 U3 y2 U3 y4 − 15i 210

q03 s12k,1

1O

1

sk,1

, U1 y1 U1 y2 U1 y3 U2 y1 U2 y2 U2 y3 U3 y1 U3 y2 U3 y3 − 15i 210

q03 s12

k,1

1O

1

sk,1

.

4.22

Hence, using the formula2.2, we can write

yk,1x

15i

210

q03 s12

k,1

eisk,1xesk,1xesk,1xeisk,1xO

1

sk,1

15i 29

q03 s12k,1

cossk,1x−coshsk,1xO

1

sk,1

.

4.23

Therefore, for the normalized eigenfunction, we get

yk,1x cossk,1x−coshsk,1xO

1

sk,1

(12)

Using the relations3.3and3.12, for sufficiently large integerk, we obtain4.17:

yk,1x cos2kx−cosh2kx O

1

k

. 4.25

In similar way, we can seek eigenfunctionyk,2xcorrespondingλk,2in the form

yk,2x

y1x, sk,2 y2x, sk,2 y3x, sk,2 y4x, sk,2

U2 y1 U2 y2 U2 y3 U2 y4 U3 y1 U3 y2 U3 y3 U3 y4 U4 y1 U4 y2 U4 y3 U4 y4 . 4.26 Then,

yk,2x y1x, sk,2

U2 y2 U2 y3 U2 y4 U3 y2 U3 y3 U3 y4 U4 y2 U4 y3 U4 y4

y2x, sk,2

U2 y1 U2 y3 U2 y4 U3 y1 U3 y3 U3 y4 U4 y1 U4 y3 U4 y4

y3x, sk,2

U2 y1 U2 y2 U2 y4 U3 y1 U3 y2 U3 y4 U4 y1 U4 y2 U4 y4

y4x, sk,2

U2 y1 U2 y2 U2 y3 U3 y1 U3 y2 U3 y3 U4 y1 U4 y2 U4 y3 . 4.27

By simple computations, we get U2 y2 U2 y3 U2 y4 U3 y2 U3 y3 U3 y4 U4 y2 U4 y3 U4 y4 3 210

q03 s9

k,2

1O

1

sk,2

, U2 y1 U2 y3 U2 y4 U3 y1 U3 y3 U3 y4 U4 y1 U4 y3 U4 y4 3i 210

q03 s9k,2

1O

1

sk,2

(13)

U2

y1

U2

y2

U2

y4

U3

y1

U3

y2

U3

y4

U4

y1

U4

y2

U4

y4

3i

210

q03 s9

k,2

1O

1

sk,2

,

U2

y1

U2

y2

U2

y3

U3

y1

U3

y2

U3

y3

U4

y1

U4

y2

U4

y3

3 210

q03 s9k,2

1O

1

sk,2

.

4.28

Hence, using the formula2.2, we can write

yk,2x

3 210

q03 s9k,2

eisk,2xiesk,2xiesk,2xeisk,2xO

1

sk,2

3i 29

q03 s9

k,2

sinsk,2x−sinhsk,2xO

1

sk,2

.

4.29

Therefore, for the normalized eigenfunction, we get

yk,2x sinsk,2x−sinhsk,2xO

1

sk,2

O

1

sk,2

. 4.30

Hence, for sufficiently large integerk, we obtain4.18:

yk,2x sin2kx−sinh2kx O

1

k

. 4.31

Case 3. Assume thatqxC30, πand the conditionsqjπqj0 0, j 0,1 and q0/0 hold. Based on the asymptotic expressions of the fundamental solutions of 1.1and the asymptotic formulas for eigenvalues of the boundary-value problem1.1,1.2 up to orderOs−7, the following result is valid.

Theorem 4.3. If the conditions qjπqj0 0, j 0,1and qπq0/0 hold, then eigenfunctions of the boundary-value problem1.1,1.2corresponding the eigenvaluesλk,1andλk,2

are of the form

yk,1x sin2kx sinh2kx O

1

k

, 4.32

yk,2x cos2kx−cosh2kx O

1

k

4.33

(14)

Proof. It is clear that

U1

yυx, sk,1

3

8

q0 s4

k,1

5ωυ

16

q0 s5

k,1

−5ω2υ

32

q0 s6

k,1

O

1

s7

k,1

,

U2

yυx, sk,1

ωυsk,1

1 8

q0 s4k,1

ωυ

16

q0 s5k,1

5ω2

υ

32

q0 s6k,1

O

1

s7k,1

,

U3

yυx, sk,1

ωυsk,12

−1

8

q0 s4

k,1

−3ωυ

16

q0 s5

k,1

− 3ωυ2

32

q0 s6

k,1

O

1

s7

k,1

.

4.34

From the conditions qjπ qj0 0j 0,1 and qπ q0/0, we have Uj1yυx, sk,1/0 forj 0,1,2. Thus, we can seek eigenfunctionyk,1xcorrespondingλk,1

in the form

yk,1x

y1x, sk,1 y2x, sk,1 y3x, sk,1 y4x, sk,1

U1

y1

U1

y2

U1

y3

U1

y4

U2

y1

U2

y2

U2

y3

U2

y4

U3

y1

U3

y2

U3

y3

U3

y4

. 4.35

Then,

yk,1x y1x, sk,1

U1

y2

U1

y3

U1

y4

U2

y2

U2

y3

U2

y4

U3

y2

U3

y3

U3

y4

y2x, sk,1

U1

y1

U1

y3

U1

y4

U2

y1

U2

y3

U2

y4

U3

y1

U3

y3

U3

y4

y3x, sk,1

U1

y1

U1

y2

U1

y4

U2

y1

U2

y2

U2

y4

U3

y1

U3

y2

U3

y4

y4x, sk,1

U1

y1

U1

y2

U1

y3

U2

y1

U2

y2

U2

y3

U3

y1

U3

y2

U3

y3

.

(15)

By simple calculations, we get

U1

y2

U1

y3

U1

y4

U2

y2

U2

y3

U2

y4

U3

y2

U3

y3

U3

y4

75 213

q03 s15

k,1

1O

1

sk,1

,

U1

y1

U1

y3

U1

y4

U2

y1

U2

y3

U2

y4

U3

y1

U3

y3

U3

y4

75i

213

q03 s15k,1

1O

1

sk,1

,

U1

y1

U1

y2

U1

y4

U2

y1

U2

y2

U2

y4

U3

y1

U3

y2

U3

y4

75i

213

q03 s15k,1

1O

1

sk,1

,

U1

y1

U1

y2

U1

y3

U2

y1

U2

y2

U2

y3

U3

y1

U3

y2

U3

y3

75 213

q03 s15

k,1

1O

1

sk,1

.

4.37

Hence, using the formula2.2, we can write

yk,1x

75 213

q03 s15k,1

eisk,1xiesk,1xiesk,1xeisk,1xO

1

sk,1

−75i

212

q03 s15

k,1

sinsk,1xsinhsk,1xO

1

sk,1

.

4.38

Therefore, for the normalized eigenfunction, we get

yk,1x sinsk,1xsinhsk,1xO

1

sk,1

. 4.39

Using the relations3.3and3.12, for sufficiently large integerk, we obtain4.32

yk,1x sin2kx sinh2kx O

1

k

. 4.40

In similar way, we can seek eigenfunctionyk,2xcorrespondingλk,2in the form

yk,2x

y1x, sk,2 y2x, sk,2 y3x, sk,2 y4x, sk,2

U2

y1

U2

y2

U2

y3

U2

y4

U3

y1

U3

y2

U3

y3

U3

y4

U4

y1

U4

y2

U4

y3

U4

y4

(16)

Then,

yk,2x y1x, sk,2

U2 y2 U2 y3 U2 y4 U3 y2 U3 y3 U3 y4 U4 y2 U4 y3 U4 y4

y2x, sk,2

U2 y1 U2 y3 U2 y4 U3 y1 U3 y3 U3 y4 U4 y1 U4 y3 U4 y4

y3x, sk,2

U2 y1 U2 y2 U2 y4 U3 y1 U3 y2 U3 y4 U4 y1 U4 y2 U4 y4

y4x, sk,2

U2 y1 U2 y2 U2 y3 U3 y1 U3 y2 U3 y3 U4 y1 U4 y2 U4 y3 . 4.42

By simple computations, we get U2 y2 U2 y3 U2 y4 U3 y2 U3 y3 U3 y4 U4 y2 U4 y3 U4 y4 − 45i 213

q03 s12

k,2

1O

1

sk,2

, U2 y1 U2 y3 U2 y4 U3 y1 U3 y3 U3 y4 U4 y1 U4 y3 U4 y4 − 45i 213

q03 s12

k,2

1O

1

sk,2

, U2 y1 U2 y2 U2 y4 U3 y1 U3 y2 U3 y4 U4 y1 U4 y2 U4 y4 45i 213

q03 s12k,2

1O

1

sk,2

, U2 y1 U2 y2 U2 y4 U3 y1 U3 y2 U3 y4 U4 y1 U4 y2 U4 y4 45i 213

q03 s12

k,2

1O

1

sk,2

.

4.43

By the formula2.2, we can write

yk,2x

45i

213

q03 s12

k,2

eisk,2xesk,2xesk,2xeisk,2xO

1

sk,2

45i 212

q03 s12k,2

cossk,2x−coshsk,2xO

1

sk,2

.

(17)

Therefore, for the normalized eigenfunction, we get

yk,2x cossk,2x−coshsk,2xO

1

sk,2

. 4.45

Hence, for sufficiently large integerk, we obtain the relation4.33

yk,2x cos2kx−cosh2kx O

1

k

. 4.46

Case 4. Assume thatqxC40, πand the conditions qjπqj0 0,j 0,2 and

q0/0 hold. Based on the asymptotic expressions of the fundamental solutions of 1.1and the asymptotic formulas for eigenvalues of the boundary-value problem1.1,1.2 up to orderOs−8, the following result is valid.

Theorem 4.4. If the conditionsqjπqj0 0, j 0,2 and q0/0 hold, then eigenfunctions of the boundary-value problem1.1,1.2corresponding the eigenvaluesλk,1andλk,2

are of the form

yk,1x cos2kx cosh2kx O

1

k

, 4.47

yk,2x sin2kx sinh2kx O

1

k

, 4.48

wherekis sufficiently large integer.

Proof. It is clear that

U1

yυx, sk,1

3

8

q0 s4k,1

5ωυ

16

q0 s5k,1

−5ω2υ

32

q0 s6

k,1

ωυ

64

q0 s7

k,1

O

1

s8

k,1

,

U2

yυx, sk,1

ωυsk,1

1 8

q0 s4

k,1

ωυ

16

q0 s5k,1

− 5ω2υ

32

q0 s6k,1

9ωυ

64

q0 s7

k,1

O

1

s8k,1

(18)

U3

yυx, sk,1

ωυsk,12

−1

8

q0 s4

k,1

−3ωυ

16

q0 s5

k,1

− 3ω2υ

32

q0 s6

k,1

ωυ

64

q0 s7 k,1 O 1 s8 k,1 . 4.49

From the conditions qjπ qj0 0 j 0,2 and qπ q0/0, we have Uj1yυx, sk,1/0 forj 0,1,2. Thus, we can seek eigenfunctionyk,1xcorrespondingλk,1

in the form

yk,1x

y1x, sk,1 y2x, sk,1 y3x, sk,1 y4x, sk,1

U1 y1 U1 y2 U1 y3 U1 y4 U2 y1 U2 y2 U2 y3 U2 y4 U3 y1 U3 y2 U3 y3 U3 y4 . 4.50 Then

yk,1x y1x, sk,1

U1 y2 U1 y3 U1 y4 U2 y2 U2 y3 U2 y4 U3 y2 U3 y3 U3 y4

y2x, sk,1

U1 y1 U1 y3 U1 y4 U2 y1 U2 y3 U2 y4 U3 y1 U3 y3 U3 y4

y3x, sk,1

U1 y1 U1 y2 U1 y4 U2 y1 U2 y2 U2 y4 U3 y1 U3 y2 U3 y4

y4x, sk,1

U1 y1 U1 y2 U1 y3 U2 y1 U2 y2 U2 y3 U3 y1 U3 y2 U3 y3 . 4.51

By simple computations, we get U1 y2 U1 y3 U1 y4 U2 y2 U2 y3 U2 y4 U3 y2 U3 y3 U3 y4 9i 216

q03 s18

k,1

1O

1

sk,1

, U1 y1 U1 y3 U1 y4 U2 y1 U2 y3 U2 y4 U3 y1 U3 y3 U3 y4 − 9i 216

q03 s18

k,1

1O

1

sk,1

(19)

U1

y1

U1

y3

U1

y4

U2

y1

U2

y3

U2

y4

U3

y1

U3

y3

U3

y4

9i

216

q03 s18

k,1

1O

1

sk,1

,

U1

y1

U1

y2

U1

y3

U2

y1

U2

y2

U2

y3

U3

y1

U3

y2

U3

y3

9i

216

q03 s18k,1

1O

1

sk,1

.

4.52

By the formula2.2, we can write

yk,1x

9i

216

q03 s18k,1

eisk,1xesk,1xesk,1xeisk,1xO

1

sk,1

9i 215

q03 s18

k,1

cossk,1xcoshsk,1xO

1

sk,1

.

4.53

Therefore, for the normalized eigenfunction, we get

yk,1x cossk,1xcoshsk,1xO

1

sk,1

. 4.54

Using the relations3.3and3.12, for sufficiently large integerk, we obtain4.47:

yk,1x cos2kx cosh2kx O

1

k

. 4.55

In similar way, we can seek eigenfunctionyk,2xcorrespondingλk,2in the form

yk,2x

y1x, sk,2 y2x, sk,2 y3x, sk,2 y4x, sk,2

U2

y1

U2

y2

U2

y3

U2

y4

U3

y1

U3

y2

U3

y3

U3

y4

U4

y1

U4

y2

U4

y3

U4

y4

(20)

By simple computations, we get

U2

y2

U2

y3

U2

y4

U3

y2

U3

y3

U3

y4

U4

y2

U4

y3

U4

y4

63 216

q03 s15

k,2

1O

1

sk,2

,

U2

y1

U2

y3

U2

y4

U3

y1

U3

y3

U3

y4

U4

y1

U4

y3

U4

y4

63i

216

q03 s15k,2

1O

1

sk,2

,

U2

y1

U2

y2

U2

y4

U3

y1

U3

y2

U3

y4

U4

y1

U4

y2

U4

y4

63i

216

q03 s15k,2

1O

1

sk,2

,

U2

y1

U2

y2

U2

y3

U3

y1

U3

y2

U3

y3

U4

y1

U4

y2

U4

y3

63 216

q03 s15

k,2

1O

1

sk,2

.

4.57

By the formula2.2, we can write

yk,2x

63 216

q03 s15k,2

eisk,2xiesk,2xiesk,2xeisk,2xO

1

sk,2

−63i

215

q03 s15

k,2

sinsk,2xsinhsk,2xO

1

sk,2

.

4.58

Therefore, for the normalized eigenfunction, we get

yk,2x sinsk,2xsinhsk,2xO

1

sk,2

. 4.59

Hence, for sufficiently large integerk, we obtain the relation4.48

yk,2x sin2kx sinh2kx O

1

k

. 4.60

Acknowledgments

(21)

References

1 N. Dunford and J. T. Schwartz,Linear Operators, Part 3 Spectral Operators, Wiley Classics Library, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1970.

2 B. M. Levitan and I. S. Sargsjan, Introduction to Spectral Theory: Selfadjoint Ordinary Differential Operators, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, USA, 1975.

3 V. A. Marchenko,Sturm-Liouville Operators and Applications, vol. 22 ofOperator Theory: Advances and Applications, Birkh¨auser, Basel, Switzerland, 1986.

4 M. A. Naimark,Linear Differential Operators. Part 1, Frederick Ungar, New York, NY, USA, 1967.

5 F. S. Rofe-Beketov and A. M. Kholkin,Spectral Analysis of Differential Operators, vol. 7 ofWorld Scientific Monograph Series in Mathematics, World Scientific Publishing, Singapore, 2005.

6 N. B. Kerimov and K. R. Mamedov, “On the Riesz basis property of root functions of some regular boundary value problems,”Mathematical Notes, vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 483–487, 1998.

7 V. A. Chernyatin, “Higher-order spectral asymptotics for the Sturm-Liouville operator,”Ordinary Differential Equations, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 217–227, 2002.

8 K. R. Mamedov and H. Menken, “On the basisness inL20,1of the root functions in not strongly regular boundary value problems,”European Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 51–60, 2008.

9 K. R. Mamedov and H. Menken, “Asymptotic formulas for eigenvalues and eigenfunctions of a nonselfadjoint Sturm-Liouville operator,” inFurther Progress in Analysis, H. G. W. Begehr, A. O. C¸ elebi, and R. P. Gilbert, Eds., pp. 798–805, World Scientific Publishing, 2009.

10 V. M. Kurbanov, “A theorem on equivalent bases for a differential operator,”Doklady Akademii Nauk, vol. 406, no. 1, pp. 17–20, 2006.

11 H. Menken and K. R. Mamedov, “Basis property inLp0,1of the root functions corresponding to a

References

Related documents

This paper describes a variational approach for computing eigenalues of a two point boundary value problem associated with coupled second order equations to which a fourth order

Davis, “Multiple solutions and eigenvalues for third-order right focal boundary value problems,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. Avery, “Multiple

In this paper, we study the dependence of eigenvalues of  n th order boundary value transmission problems on the problem. Using the ideas of Mukhtarov and Yakubov [] and Wang et

Malaguti, “On a nonlocal boundary value problem for second order nonlinear singular di ff erential equations,” Georgian Mathematical Journal , vol. Webb, “Positive solutions of

Existence and multiple solutions to a discrete fourth order boundary value problem Liu et al Advances in Difference Equations (2018) 2018 427 https //doi org/10 1186/s13662 018 1879 1 R E

Keywords: Fourth order; Multipoint boundary value problem; Resonance; Coincidence degree

Cabada studied a fourth order periodic boundary value problem similar to (1.1), using a gen- eralized method of upper and lower solutions and developing the monotone iterative

STUDY THEBEHAVIOR OF THE SOLUTION OF SIXTH ORDER BOUNDARY VALUE PROBLEM The aim of this section is to estimate the behavior of the solution to the given sixth order boundary