IT Governance: framework
d
t d
and case study
Presenter
Yaowaluk Chadbunchachai
Yaowaluk Chadbunchachai
Advisory Services
Presentation topics
►
ERM and IT governance
►
IT governance framework
►
IT governance assessment
g
►
Case study – Implication of IT governance
on internal audit
on internal audit
“We think IT governance needs to be a shared commitment across
the business, it’s not something that can be left to the CIO and IT
departments. Instead, to be effective, it must be understood and
p
,
,
the responsibility shared throughout the business.”
ERM and IT governance
ISO9000
ISO38500
OCEG
CMM
Balanced
IT
IT
GRC
ITIL
Balanced
Score
C
d
IT
IT
Governance
Governance
Frameworks
Frameworks
Card
SAS 70/
ISAE 3402
Frameworks…
Frameworks…
Confused ??
Confused ??
ISO27001
COBIT
S
3 0
ISO31000
COSO IC/ERM
IT GRC Drivers & Objectives
► Most companies have take a very siloed approach to IT risk management which creates multiple
redundancies and extensive inconsistency in how IT risks are assessed and managed.
A ff ti IT GRC ill t th l ti f IT i k d t l t t f
► An effective IT GRC program will aggregate the evaluation of IT risks and controls to create a convergence of
IT Risk Management activities which results in greater consistency and efficiency across the IT GRC program and the company as a whole.
Common Current State Desired Future State
Board oversight Audit committee Compensation committee Risk committees Other committee Executive management
External – regulators, analysts, investors Board/senior management oversight
Audit Risk Other
e
rnal ntrol
Executive management
CEO CFO CRO General Counsel
committee committee committees
Internal audit Int e co n External audit Aligned mandate and scope
Internal audit Risk management Compliance Internal control Information technology Legal and regulatory External audit
Business Business Business Business
g p
Coordinated infrastructure and people Consistent methods and practices Common information and technology Business Business Business Business
22 September 2010 Page 6 © Ernst & Young Corporate Services Limited 2010. All Rights Reserved. IT governance: framework and case study
ERM and IT governance
ERM
IT Governance Defined
“IT Governance is a set of IT management activities, policies,
g
, p
,
standards and measures developed to ensure desirable behavior,
for the effective, efficient and secure use of technology.”
E t & Y Ernst & Young
IT Governance Determines Key IT Governance Decisions
► Evaluation of business initiatives and risk
► Who makes decisions
► Power
► How they make them
► Decision Process/Rights
► Evaluation of business initiatives and risk ► Prioritization of projects
► Allocation of resources and budgets ► Performance measurements
All i f d ► Decision Process/Rights
► Why they make them
► Alignment
► Allocation of costs and cost measurement
methods
► Tracking and reporting mechanisms
► Assessment of value of an IT investment
Without proper governance, an organization
is at risk of losing its competitive advantage
► Assessment of value of an IT investment
22 September 2010 Page 9 IT governance: framework and case study
Why is IT Governance necessary?
►
Fundamentally, it enables a stronger competitive position due
to improved performance efficiency and effectiveness at all
to improved performance, efficiency and effectiveness at all
levels of the organization
►
Ensures enterprise alignment
►
Ensures enterprise alignment
►
Ensure effective IT processes and delivery
►
Ensure effective risk management
►
Establishes and deploys the right IT resources and
y
g
capabilities
►
Enables continuous performance improvement
p
p
►
Underpins legal and regulatory compliance
The Enterprise Agenda for IT
►How does IT impact your business?
► Value – how does IT create value for the
Align Strategically
enterprise?
► Cost – how does IT help rationalize the overall
costs of the business?
Create Value
g
g
y
vely
Op
costs of the business?
► Risk – how does IT help the business manage
its overall risk position?
►IT can be a competitive advantage or a corporate
Objectives
ern E
ff
ecti
v
er
at
e E
ffi
c
►IT can be a competitive advantage or a corporate hindrance
►We believe that for IT to create a positive impact,
Manage
Risk
Rationalize
Cost
Go
ve
cien
tly
there are four “must do’s” for the enterprise relative to IT: ► Align Strategically
Measure Performance
► Govern Effectively ► Operate Efficiently ► Measure Performance22 September 2010 Page 11 IT governance: framework and case study
The ITGI Model – Strategic Alignment
Strategic Alignment, g g , focuses on ensuring the linkage of business and IT g g plans; defining, maintaining and validating the IT value proposition; and aligning IT operations with enterprise operations.
ic V
ic V ► Align IT strategy with enterprise strategy
Strateg ic
Align
ment DelivValuerye
t
P IT IT
Strateg ic
Align
ment DelivValuerye
t
P IT IT
g gy p gy
► Ensure IT delivers against the strategy ► Co-responsibility of business and IT ► Direct IT strategy Risk anag em ent Pe rfo rm anc M easu rem Governance Governance Domains Domains Risk anag em ent Pe rfo rm anc M easu rem Governance Governance Domains
Domains ► Ensure a culture of openness and collaboration among the business,
geographical and functional units of the
Ma Resource Management nc e m ent Ma Resource Management nc e m ent enterprise
The ITGI Model – Value Delivery
Value Delivery is about executing the value proposition throughout the delivery cycle, ensuring that IT delivers the promised benefits against the strategy, y g p g gy
concentrating on optimising costs and proving the intrinsic value of IT.
ic V
ic V
► Appropriate quality, on time and on
budget
Strate gic Align
ment DelivValuerye
t
P IT IT
Strate gic Align
ment DelivValuerye
t
P IT IT
► Clarify value, educate, involve
stakeholders and manage perceptions F l t ki f b i l Risk anag em ent Pe rfo rm anc M ea su rem Governance Governance Domains Domains Risk anag em ent Pe rfo rm anc M ea su rem Governance Governance Domains
Domains ► Formal tracking of business value of IT (business requirements & process change)
► Disciplined approach to project
Ma Resource Management nc e m ent Ma Resource Management nc e m
ent ► Disciplined approach to project
management with a larger role for the business
► Technology standardisation
22 September 2010 Page 13 IT governance: framework and case study
The ITGI Model – Risk Management
Risk Management requires risk awareness by senior corporate officers, a clear understanding of the enterprise’s appetite for risk, , g p pp , understanding of compliance requirements, transparency about the significant risks to the enterprise and embedding of risk
management responsibilities into the organisation.
gic t D Val
gic t D Val ► A areness of IT risks based on
Strateg ic
Align
ment DelivValuerye
nt P M GovernanceGovernanceIT IT Strateg ic Align
ment DelivValuerye
nt
P
M GovernanceGovernanceIT IT
► Awareness of IT risks based on
proactive and continuous assessment
► Transparency to all stakeholders ► Establishing responsibility and
Risk Man agem en Pe rfo rm anc M easu rem e Governance Governance Domains Domains Risk Man agem en Pe rfo rm anc M easu rem e Governance Governance Domains
Domains ► Establishing responsibility and embedding risk management into the organisation
► Risk mitigation can generate
cost-Ma Resource Management ce ent Ma Resource Management ce
ent ► Risk mitigation can generate
cost-efficiencies
► Information security
The ITGI Model – Resource Management
Resource Management is about the optimal investment in, and the proper management of, critical IT resources: applications, information,
p p g , pp , ,
infrastructure and people. Key issues relate to the optimisation of knowledge and infrastructure.
ic V
ic V ► Inventories of hardware and
Strateg ic
Align
ment DelivValuerye
t
P IT IT
Strateg ic
Align
ment DelivValuerye
t
P IT IT
software
► Practices to train and retain
skilled staff Cl i t t d f d Risk anag em ent Pe rfo rm anc M easu rem Governance Governance Domains Domains Risk anag em ent Pe rfo rm anc M easu rem Governance Governance Domains
Domains ► Clear, consistent and enforced procurement policies
► Standardised and interoperable
infrastructure Ma Resource Management nc e m ent Ma Resource Management nc e m ent infrastructure
► Service level management
The ITGI Model – Performance Measurement
Performance Measurement, tracks and monitors strategy implementation project completion resource usage process implementation, project completion, resource usage, process performance and service delivery, using, for example, balanced scorecards that translate strategy into action to achieve goals measurable beyond conventional accounting.
tegic nt D Valu
tegic nt D Valu ► Define and monitor measures
Strateg Align
ment Delivalueery
ent
Pe
M GovernanceGovernanceIT IT
Strateg Align
ment Delivalueery
ent
Pe
M GovernanceGovernanceIT IT
► Define and monitor measures
► IT Balanced Scorecard as emerging
reporting system
► A management reporting system that
Risk Man agem en erf orm an ce M easu rem e Go e a ce Domains Domains Risk Man agem en erf orm an ce M easu rem e Go e a ce Domains
Domains ► A management reporting system that feeds back into the strategy
► The most effective means to achieve IT
and Business alignment
M Resource Management e ent M Resource Management e
ent and Business alignment
► Enabling effective value measurement
(ROI, NPV…)
Assessing IT Governance
N
i
Initial/
Repeatable
Defined
Managed
O i i d
0
1
2
3
4
5
Non-existent
Ad Hoc
but Intuitive
process
and Measurable Optimised
0 - Management processes are not applied at all
(Maturity Model - CobiT 4.1 )
0 - Management processes are not applied at all.
1 - Processes are ad hoc and disorganised.
2 - Processes follow a regular pattern
2 - Processes follow a regular pattern.
3 - Processes are documented and communicated.
4 - Processes are monitored and measured
4 - Processes are monitored and measured.
5 - Best practices are followed and automated.
Assessing IT Governance
Sample Maturity Model for IT Governance
i i l i
1
0
IT Governance – Value Delivery
Maturity Model - CobiT 4.1
Value Delivery
Domain 1 2 3 4 5
IT Direction & Planning Enterprise IT Architecture Value Measurement Project Portfolio Mgt 1. 2. 3. 4. Non-Existent Initial/ Ad Hoc Repeatable but Intuitive Defined process Managed and Measurable Optimized 0 1 2 3 4 5 3rdParty Relationship Mgt 5. Legend Current State 0 - Processes are non-existent
1 - Processes are ad hoc & Legend
Current State Interim Target State
Current State Interim Target State Target State
disorganized
2 - Processes are repeatable but intuitive
3 - Processes are defined, documented & communicated 4 P d & Target State 4 - Processes are managed & measured
5 - Processes are optimized
Example also in Appendix D (page 48) of Board Briefing on IT Governance booklet
22 September 2010 Page 19 IT governance: framework and case study
Assessing IT Governance
►
Maturity model ranking
►
Organizational scorecard to ITGI model
►
Organizational scorecard to ITGI model
►
Gap analysis leading to improvement initiatives
►
Uses a scale of 0 through 5 to measure the maturity level of the area
being assessed
►
Do not assume that the desired state is always 5
Critical to perform analysis over time; especially as the
business changes (e.g. mergers integrations etc ) mergers, integrations, etc.)
Example: IT Governance Maturity
Assessment Components
Assessment Components
Strategic Alignment Performance Measurement Resource Management Risk Management Value Delivery IT Governance Framework ►Role of IT/Definition of IT Value ►Strategic Direction ►Performance Metrics ►Performance Monitoring ►Quality ►IT Resource & Asset Management ►Infrastructure Management ►IT & Business Risk Management Alignment ►Integrated IT ►IT Direction and Planning ►Enterprise IT Architecture ►Value ►Program Mission and Framework ►Program Oversight ►Communication ►Business, IT and Operations Alignment ►Investment Prioritization and Allocation y Improvement ►Continuous Process Improvement ►Scope of Potential g ►Technology Lifecycle Management ►Knowledge Management ►Strategic g Risk Management Framework ►IT Risk Oversight Measurement ►Program and Project Management ►Third-Party Relationship Strategy ►Corporate Alignment Allocation Potential Measurement ►Strategic Sourcing Relationship ManagementMaturity Model Scale
3.5 2 2.5 4 3 1.5
5 IT Governance Maturity Score Distribution
0 Processes are non-existent
1 Processes are ad-hoc and disorganized 2 Processes are repeatable but intuitive
3 Processes are defined, documented and intuitive 4 Processes are managed and measured
ITG SA VD RiM R M PM 1 2 3 4 0
22 September 2010 Page 21 IT governance: framework and case study
Example: IT Governance Executive
Stakeholder Questionnaire
Stakeholder Questionnaire
Degree of Agreement
(Max, Average, Min)
Strategic Alignment Strong ly Agree Agree Und ecided/ Neutra l Disagre e Strong ly Disagre e 5 4 3 2 1 Strategic Alignment 5 4 3 2 1
1 I am informed of the strategy of the business.
2 I understand the technology strategy of the organization.
3 I agree with how projects and initiatives are prioritized.
4 I understand how budgets are agreed upon. 5 Projects are aligned with organizational strategy.
6 Project alignment is periodically reevaluated.
7 IT t k h ld b ht i t th j t l i th l i h f th j t 7 IT stakeholders are brought into the project early in the planning phase of the project.
Value Delivery
8 I am realizing the full value of the investment in IT.
9 If and/or when I we upgrade software or infrastructure, I believe I have input into the decision.pg p
10 I am aware of the IT charges (and how the IT charges) are allocated.
11 The organization formally recognizes and measures the value delivered from a technology-enabled process.
Case study – Implication of IT governance on
internal audit
Link risk to IT objectives and processes
Inherent key IT risks IT processes
IT objectives and strategies
es
► IT Process Duplication and Inefficiencies ► Emerging Technologies Guidance and oversight Strategic planning IT governance and strategy Infrastructure and Asset Management o cesses ontrol Ac tivities o risks sk to IT objec tiv e ► Technology Direction ► System Disruptions
► Contracts/3rd Party Vendors -Outsourcing IT development and design Change Management Service Level Management Deliver superior systems and applications Technology enablement to achieve business k s to IT pr o ag em en t and C o b jectives t o fica nce of the
ris ► Records Retention
► Regulatory Compliance ► People Management ► Global Sourcing g Production Support to achieve business objectives Superior service support and delivery
Link ris k Evalua te Man a Link o b alua te the signi f ► Global Sourcing ► Business Continuity ► Asset and Portfolio
Management ► IT Infrastructure Capacity Problem and incident management Project/ program Optimize operating efficiency Continuity of services IT operations Protection of Ev a ► IT Infrastructure Capacity ► IT Security/Privacy ► Financial Reporting program management Protection of information Effectively manage security risk Information security and protection Customer Support
IT Audit (or IT Risk Management) can
bring more value to the organization
bring more value to the organization
►
Implementing measures for compliance has made organizational change
management a key skill of the IT auditor
►
The same skills used to facilitate compliance can now be used to facilitate
IT Effectiveness
IT Effectiveness
►
With the focus over the past five years on financial and compliance risk,
strategic and operational risk has been largely ignored
►
It is critical for organizations to refresh their IT risk universe to include all IT
risks
►
We are seeing a significant shift in the charter of IT auditors and a renewed
►
We are seeing a significant shift in the charter of IT auditors and a renewed
focus on assessing and reducing strategic and operational risk
What is the role of your IT Audit function?
►
Is IT Audit focused solely on financial and compliance risk?
►
What is needed to take IT Audit to the next level?
►
What is needed to take IT Audit to the next level?
►
CGEIT Certification
PMI/CMMI T i i
►
PMI/CMMI Training
►
ITIL Training
C
i
t ith k
l d
t
f
►
Co-sourcing agreement with knowledge transfer
►
How can IT Audit demonstrate more value to the organization?
M k
IT i k
t
l t
th
►
Make sure your IT risk assessment process evaluates the
impact of all major IT risks, including operational and
strategic risks
strategic risks
►
Measure the before and after impact of initiatives designed
to better manage strategic and operational risks
22 September 2010 Page 26 © Ernst & Young Corporate Services Limited 2010. All Rights Reserved. IT governance: framework and case study
Ernst & Young
Assurance | Tax | Transactions | Advisory
About Ernst & Young
Ernst & Young is a global leader in assurance, tax, transaction and advisory services. Worldwide, our 144,000 people are united by our shared values and an unwavering commitment to quality. We make a shared values and an unwavering commitment to quality. We make a difference by helping our people, our clients and our wider communities achieve potential.
For more information, please visit www.ey.com.
Ernst & Yo ng refers to the global organi ation of member firms of Ernst & Yo ng Global Ernst & Young refers to the global organization of member firms of Ernst & Young Global Limited, each of which is a separate legal entity. Ernst & Young Global Limited, a UK company limited by guarantee, does not provide services to clients.