2:13-cv GAD-LJM Doc # 6 Filed 04/03/13 Pg 1 of 6 Pg ID 174 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Full text
Related documents
Respondents filed an objection to Petitioner’s exemptions on September 21, 2005, but did not file a proof of claim conforming to 3001(a) until December 21, 2005. The bankruptcy
It appears that the plaintiff decided to switch attorneys in late May or early June of 2011. The Feiger Firm and Dennis Dettmer filed a stipulation on June 2, 2011 to substitute
On or about October 2, 2009, Hamdan, through the forget1 email account and using the Internet Protocol address that resolved to the hotel Hamdan knew and used, sent text to
In order to prevail on its Motion for Summary Judgment, Plaintiff needs to show that: (1) Defendant signed the promissory note, (2) Plaintiff is the present owner or holder of the
In contrast to many other types of debts, § 523(a)(8)’s exclusion of student loans from discharge is self-executing in the sense that, unless the debtor affirmatively secures
The Court finds that even if the crack in the sidewalk was itself open and obvious, Plaintiff has created a genuine issue of fact by providing photographic evidence purportedly
Experts’ statutory and common law conversion claims are likewise subject to dismissal. A breach of a contractual obligation cannot support an action in tort absent the “violation of
determination persuasive. Furthermore, as Sunrise and Magistrate Judge Whalen point out, the language of Marko’s secured creditor agreement did not actually apply to his