Astigmatism
in
cataract
surgery
MAURICE H. LUNTZ AND DESIREE G. LIVINGSTON
Fromthe Department ofOphthalmology, Universityofthe Witwatersrand andJohannesburgGeneral Hospital
SUMMARY Wereporton our
investigation
intoastigmatism
in 40eyesfollowing
acornealcataract
incision
closed with a continuous10/0 nylon
monofilament suture(Ethilon).
Immediately after
surgery therewas
astigmatism
causedby
thenylon
suture(suture-induced
astigmatism),
itsseverity
depending
on thetightness
ofthe suture. Itranged
from 1 to10
5dioptres,
the mean value4
09
dioptres
withastandard deviationof ±2 5.Removing
thenylon
suture eliminated thisastigmatism
and
within a few weeks the cornealastigmatism
correction in480%
ofeyes returned to thepre-operative level. In
80%
ofeyes thedifference between the finalpostoperative
cornealastigmatism
(4
monthsafterremoving
thecontinuoussuture)
andthepreoperative astigmatism
was0-75dioptres
or less and the maximum
change
was 1-5dioptres.
In40%
ofeyesthe axis of thecylinder
changed
from
ahorizontal to anoblique
axis but didnotchange
froma with-toagainst-the-rule
axis.
The
degree
ofastigmatism
remainedconstantwhile the suturewas inplace
and in 50%
ofeyeswas
equal
to orless than 3dioptres.
Themeanofthespherical equivalents
was 1131dioptres with
a standard deviation of +1 25. A
spectacle
correction 14days
afteroperation prescribed
either asthe
meanspherical equivalent (11-50
dioptres)
oraccording
to thepatient's
refraction willgive
satisfactory
vision until the suture is removed4 months after operation.The
degree
ofastigmatism
following
a corneal section and continuousnylon
suture comparesvery
favourably w-ith astigmatism following
othersuturing
techniques
for cataract.Improvements inthe surgical technique ofcataract
extraction and thedesiretominimise
complications
have focused attentiononthecataractincision andits closure. As aresult suture materials have been developed which can be more accurately placed
within the incision, allow excellent anatomical apposition, and cause less postoperative irritation andreaction.
The most suitable suture materials at present
available for cataract surgery are virgin silk and monofilamentnylon.Themonofilament nylon(10/0) is less irritating, the eye postoperatively is quieter,
and the irregular incisional scars associated with ulcerationandextrusionofvirgin silk areeliminated.
It has the added advantages that the material is
elasticandisnotextruded, so thatitcanbe used as
acontinuous suture. Tissue reaction to the nylon is minimised and scar formation is delayed, so that the nylon is left in the incision for 3 to 4 months. The prolonged, firm, and anatomically precise
apposition of the incision produces a neater scar.
A survey of the literature indicated that there is little knowledge of the amount of astigmatism
Address for reprints: Professor H. Luntz, University of
Witwatersrand, Medical School, Hospital Street,
Johannes-burg 20001,South Africa
caused by continuousnylon sutures(Lamckeet
al.,
1971; Boke etal., 1971; Troutman, 1973). Wehavedesigned a study to measure this and the factors
that influence it. A previous study (Luntz and
Livingston, 1976) showed that the type of suture
material and/or suturing technique does not signi-ficantlyinfluence the finalpostoperativeastigmatism.
This study and other studies ofpost-cataract
astig-matism do not include a corneal section with a continuous nylon suture and do not measure
'suture-induced' astigmatism.
We have investigated the effect of a continuous nylon suture in a corneal section on the final
post-operative astigmatism (afterremoval of sutures and
normalisation of suture-induced astigmatism) and
whether this is influenced by the level of suture-inducedastigmatism.
Subjectsand methods
We report a prospective study in 40 eyes of 32 patients. This number comprises all cataract patients operated on by one of us during 1975
(M.H.L.) inwhom a corneal section was closed by
a continuous 10/0 monofilament nylon suture
(Ethilon) in a running shoe-string configuration as
usedby Ryan and Maumenee
(1973)
but inalimbalincision undera
conjunctival
flap.
Keratometer(K)
readings
were takenpreoperatively
and at 6 weeksl0-after
operation.
The sutures were removed after 4months, the 'K'
readings
taken,
andrepeated
4months later. The last
reading
was taken for the purpose of thisstudy
as the finalpostoperative
B-corneal
astigmatism.
Refraction was done 6 weeksafter
operation
and 4 months and 8 months later. To follow the course ofpostoperative
corneal
astigmatism
in greater detail the 'K'readings
in 6,-5 eyes were takenpreoperatively
and 2 weeks and 4 monthspostoperatively
when sutures wereremoved. These were
repeated
at 4weeks,
6weeks,
o
and 4 months afterremoval of the sutures. a
A standardised
surgical
technique
was used. The4-eye
wasopened
by
cutting
agroove
extending
for1500
(from the 9 o'clockto 2 o'clockposition)
overthe upper half of the cornea
immediately
anteriorto the corneo-scleral limbus and to two-thirds of
2-the corneal
depth.
The anterior chamber wasperforated
at theright-hand
corner of the groove and the sectioncompleted
with corneal scissorscutting
to theleft,
the scissors heldvertically.
The 0resultwas a
2-plane
incisionwithacorneal bevel in Kreadings
Kreadings
Kreadings
thedeep
one-third. The incision was closed with abeforeroperation
befo re suturecontinuous
10/0
nylon
suture which resembled aremoval
closed boot-lace
(Fig.
1).
Thefirstsuturewasplaced
Fig.2 Cornealastigmatism('K'
readings) before andat the
right-sided
end ofthe incision tothe level of afteracorneal cataract incision closed by a 'boot-lace'Descemet's membrane and radial to the incision type of continuous
10/0
nylon (Ethilon) suture in 40 eyes.followed by 4 deep, radial bites across theincision, Postoperative astigmatism is recorded after 6 weeks with
followethd
byr4deep,mrainial
contesnuross.the
incisiwe
the suture in place and 4 monthsafter removing thethe thread
remaining
continuous. Loops were suture. The 3measurementsforeacheyeareseparatelymoved to either side of the incision to
keep
them plotted and each joined by a continuous line. Theout of the way, and the lens was extracted. astigmatism is significantly increased 6 weeks after
After extraction ofthe lens thecontinuous suture surgery owing tothe suture. Thefinal postoperative
astigmatism
(4
monthsafterremoving
thesuture)
7W.a.N/ approximatesthepreoperativevalues
was
completed
with 4 suturesplaced
from left to right across the lengthof the incision, each one atmidpoint
between thedeep
sutures,atalevel of half the cornealdepth
andparallel
to thesucceeding
deep
suture. The 2free ends weretied and theknot was buried in the cornea on the scleral side. Theuse of
deep
andsuperficial
bites ensuresgood
apposition
of the endothelial andepithelial
surfaces.It is
important
only
toapproximate
the incisionedges
withoutdrawing
the suture up tootightly.
The anterior chamber was filled with balanced salt
l~o~'
_ solutionto ensure awatertight
closure.Results
Fig. 1 Photographof'boot-lace'typeofcontinuous10/0 CORNEAL ASTIGMATISM
nylon (Ethilon)suture used to close a corneal cataract
Preoperative
corneal
astigmatism
and the6- 5-4 I) c.- 3-0 2-I 75+ 2-s
MeanofK readinqs MeanofKreadinqs MeanofKreadinqs withstondard withstandord withstondard
deviotionbefore deviationbefore deviation 4months
operation sutureremoval aftersutureremoval Fig. 3 Corneal astigmatism ('K'readings)in40eyes
withcataractincisionsclosed witha 'boot-lace'typeof continuous10/0 nylon (Ethilon)suture. Themeanvalues
andthestandard deviations of the preoperative 'K' readings (thefirstplot),the astigmatism caused bythe
suturemeasured 6weeksafteroperation(the second plot), andmeasured 4 monthsafter removal ofthesutures
(thirdplot)
40 eyes are recorded graphically in Figs. 2 and 3.
Thevalues for each eye are individually plotted in
Fig. 2, while Fig. 3 records the mean values and
their standard deviations. The graphs demonstrate
dramatically how cornealastigmatismwasincreased when measured 6 weeks after operation with the nylon sutures in place. Half the eyes had corneal
astigmatism ofbetween 0 and 3 dioptres. The higher readings, which ranged from 3 dioptres to 10-5 dioptres of cylinder, occurred early intheseriesand
resulted fromclosing thesuturetootightly, causing excessivedistortion of thecorneae.Wesubsequently corrected this fault and reduced the level of astig-matism. Themeanastigmatism before operationwas
0-75dioptres, SD±0-6,withthesuture inplace 4 09
dioptres, SD±2-5, and 4 months afterremoving the
suture 1-15 dioptres, SD+0-6.
The second point that these graphs demonstrate
is the dramatic drop in the magnitude of corneal astigmatismoncethesutureswereremoved. Inmost
eyesthefinal postoperative cornealastigmatism was
about the same as the preoperative measurement
and in 2 eyes less. It did not exceed 2-25 dioptres and was independent of the magnitude of the
astigmatism caused by the suture(Fig. 2).
ASTIGMATISM BY REFRACTION
Objective refraction togiveanaccurate estimate of astigmatism before operation was not possible in
all our cases because lens
opacities
interfered withor obstructed the reflect.
However,
objective
refractionsweredone2weeksafteroperation
(with
the continuous suture tied in the cornea) and at 2 and 4monthsafter removalof thecontinuoussuture.The results areplotted in Fig. 4 and are
expressed
as minuscylinders.
The firstplot
2 weeks afteroperation
represents the astigmatism measuredby
refractionand causedby the suture,in 55% ofeyesbetween 1-5 and 3 dioptres. Once the sutures were
removed astigmatism dropped within 4 weeks to
thefinal
postoperative
level and remainedconstant.SUTURE-INDUCED AND SURGICALLY INDUCED ASTIGMATISM
The above measurements reflect astigmatism
mea-suredwith the suture in place and after itsremoval.
10 8-4. .' 6 K-K -CL 0 0 - 4 E 0 E 0r 2-0
crAK-AK1 AK- AK1
5 Suture induced
Surqically
induced astiqmotism astiqmatismAK Kreadinqsbefore operation AK2-K readinqs4monthspostoperation
withsuture
AK3-Kreadinqs4monthsaftersuture
removal
Fig. 4 Astigmatism byrefractionin 40 eyeswith a cataract sectionclosed by a'boot-lace' type of 10/0 nylon (Ethilon) suture measured at 2 weeks
ajter
operation (first plot) and at 2 months (second plot) and 4 months (thirdplot) after removal of the sutures. Measurements are expressed as minuscylinders. The graph demonstrates theastigmatism caused bythe suture (firstplot)and the rapid return topreoperative levelsafterremoval of the suture(second and thirdplots)-600- sised in Fig. 6, which records the pre- and
post-operativecorneal astigmatism. In 48
%
of eyes therewas nochangefrom thepre-to postoperative level; in 2 eyes the astigmatism after operation was actually
-500- less than before operation. These two results are
plottedbelow the abscissa in Fig. 5.
In 5eyes the behaviour of thepre-suture-removal
and post-suture-removal corneal astigmatism was
-400- \ \ \ followed inmoredetail,and these resultsareplotted
inFig.7. The level of suture-inducedastigmatism is
reachedat 2 weeks aftersurgery and remains
con-stant after this. After removal of the sutures the
-300\
\ \astigmatism
drops rapidly to reach the finalpost-OL -3 co >\,\ \\operationlevel within 4 weeks and remains relatively
Q constant atthislevel.
CHANGES IN CYLINDER AXIS
-2c00- In
60%
of eyes thecylinder
axis measured afterremoval of the suture and
compared
to thepre-operative finding remained unchanged (Table 1).
If the
cylinder
axis didchange
itchanged
from a-ICo_
G_horizontal
to anoblique
direction,
but not fromwithto
against
therule.SPHERICAL EQUIVALENTS
o The
spherical equivalent
calculated from the 'K'Asti matism Aftjer 2monthsafter 4monthsafter -1dote
byr,fraction: operation
removinq
suture removingsuture readings with the sutures in place was 1131 dioptresFig. 5 Thesuture-induced cornealastigmatism ('K' (mean
value)
with a standard deviation of±1
-25.readingsbefore operation subtractedfromthe 'K' readings with the sutures in place read 6 weeksafter
operation) isplotted closest to the abscissa. It measures up to 2-0 dioptres in97% of eyes. Thesurgically
inducedastigmatism ('K'readingsbeforeoperation 2-00 A
subtractedfromthefinal 'K'measurement4monthsafter
removing the suture) is plotted farthest from the abscissa. There is no surgically induced astigmatism in about half the eyesanditdoesnotexceed1J5dioptres
They
do not,however,
reflect theactual amount of oo-astigmatism(orcorneal distortion) produced bythe
suture (suture-induced astigmatism) and by the scarringprocess oftheoperation(surgically induced astigmatism). The suture-induced astigmatism is
obtained by subtracting the astigmatism measured with the suture in
place
from thepreoperative
0measurementmeasurementand the surgically induced astigmatism
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~before
Kread9ings
operation 4 monthsKread
atr'eby subtractingthe astigmatism after removal of the sutureremoval
suturesfrom thepreoperative reading. These results Fig.6 The 'K'readings beforeandaftercataract
in terms of corneal astigmatism are recorded surgeryin40eyes. Cornealastigmatismbeforethe
graphically
inFig.
5. Suture-induced astigmatismis operation is plotted closesttothe abscissa and cornealplotted
closest to the abscissa, surgically induced astigmatism 4 months after the removal of the continuousastigmatism
farthest from it. The former was less10/0
nylon suture is plotted farthest from the abscissa.than 2
dioptres
in 97%
ofeyes;only
1 eyeexceeded Inthemajority
of
eyesthechange
from
preoperativetot 2dioptres2diptre.
Thin
Thre97ws nosurgcallnoeyes;only
1ie
indcedexcd
eedd
sti- postoperative astigmatism is minimal. In 2 eyes thepostoperative astigmatism wasless than thepreoperativematism in about half the eyes (these plots lie on the and the sum of the two becomes a plus instead of minus.
7- 6- 5.- "4.-Q.
03.-2-it;
t
Operation Suture removal
2 16 4 6 lb
Weeks Weeks
Kreodings Kreadings Kreadings
before before after
operation sutureremoval sutureremoval Fig.7 Acornealcataract section wasmadeinS eyes andclosedwith a continuous 'boot-lace'typeof 10/0 nylon (Ethilon)suture. Cornealastigmatism was
measuredat2weeksand16weeksaftertheoperation,
withthesuture inthe cornea, and at 4weeks,10weeks,
and 16 weeksafter removalofthesuture. Thegraph
demonstrates the relativestability oftheastigmatism
causedbythezsuturefrom2weeksafter the operation
The mean postoperative
spherical
equivalent (4 monthsafter removalofthesuture) calculated from the 'K' readingswas11'85
dioptres with astandard deviation of +1 8(Table 2).Discussion
Lack of knowledge about the degree andproperties of suture-induced astigmatism has deterred many surgeons from using nylon sutures in cataract surgery and inparticularacontinuousnylon suture,
Table 1 Change in directionofcylinder axisfrom
preoperative 'K' measurement to post-suture removal 'K' measurement
Change ofaxis Numberof eyes Percentage
Nochange 24 60
Zerotooblique(<45') 3 75 Zero towiththerule(<45') 1 2-5 Zero toagainstthe rule(<45°) 4 10
=45' 8 20
Withtoagainsttherule(900) 0 0
Total 40 100
Table2 Meanofpostoperativesphericalequivalents
Suture Number Mean SD
Nylon10/0interrupted 32 10-7 2-8 Virgin silk 8/0interrupted 17 11-7 1.9 Nylon 10/0 continuous under
conjunctival flap 22 10-6 0-58
Nylon10/0continuous incorneal
section 40 11-85 ±1-8
Nostatisticalsignificance (t test)
atechniquethathasanumberof obviousadvantages. Tension of thesutureisequallydistributed
through-outthedepth of theincision,ensuring
good
anatomi-cal apposition. Individual sutures can be moreaccurately placed in relationtoeach other.
Surgical
knots are kept to a minimum, thuseliminating
another source of postoperative irritation and reaction.As the nylon incites little tissue reaction and remains fixed in its suture bed, corneal
distortion
(astigmatism) produced when the suture is tied should remainconstantwhile the sutureis inplace.
Itshould disappear when thesutureis removed. Suture-inducedastigmatism isnot aproblem with virgin
silk
orabsorbablesutures which areplacedasedge-to-edge, interrupted sutures. Postoperative tissue oedema and even necrosis within individual
suturescausethemto cutout and releasetensionon
the incision, and virgin silk is extruded.
Conse-quently thecorneatendstoregainitsoriginal shape, minimising astigmatism. To eliminate
suture-induced astigmatism from nylon sutures requires their removal, whichis easierif theincisionis
corneal
rather than subconjunctival. Hence the preference for acorneal section.Every eye in this studydeveloped some degreeof suture-induced astigmatism. In half ofthem it did
notexceed 3dioptres(Fig. 2).
Once established (14 days after operation) the degree of astigmatism remained constant until the suturewasremoved (Fig. 7), its magnitude being in
direct proportionto thetightness of the suture. The sutureshould betightened only enough to approxi-matethewoundedges. The fact thatsuture-induced astigmatism remained constant meant that patients could be fitted with a cataract spectacle 2 weeks after surgerythat tided them over the 3 to 4 months
postoperatively until the continuous suture was removed. The cataract correction was dispensed either according to the patient's refraction or as a +11 50 dioptre sphere, which was the mean of the
suture-induced spherical equivalents.
Once the suture was removed the astigmatism
Table 3 Differenceofpre-andpostoperative astigmatism
(keratometry)
Suture Number Mean SD
Nylon10/0interrupted 31 -1-6 1-2 Virgin silk8/0interrupted 18 -06 1-6 Nylon 10/0continuous under
conjunctival flap 11 -09 2-0
Nylon10/0 continuous in corneal
section 40 -115 0-6
No statisticalsignificance(t test)
postoperative astigmatism was not significantly changed from the preoperative value, nor was it
influenced by the magnitude of the astigmatism causedby thesuture(Figs. 2and3).In48%ofeyes thepre- and postoperative corneal astimatismwere
thesame,and in 80% thechangewasequaltoorless than075 dioptres (Figs. 5 and 6),testimonytothe fact that a continuous 10/0 nylon suture achieves and maintains excellent apposition ofthe incision.
In 40% ofeyes the axis was displaced obliquely,
probably the result ofatendencytotiltthe incision
to theright side (the incision was made from the
9 o'clock positiontothe2o'clockposition), allowing better use of the exposure for a right-handed surgeon when removing the lens. In none of them
did itchange from withtoagainst the rule(Table 1). The preponderance in this study of with-the-rule astigmatism following cataract surgery and of
oblique astigmatism, the flat meridian moved vertically, which can be explained by an obliquely
placed incision, confirms the findings ofan earlier
investigation (Bedrossian etal., 1969).
In a previous publication we compared the final
postoperative corneal astigrnatism and spherical equivalent in scleral cataract incisions closed by interrupted 8/0 virgin silk, interrupted 10/0 nylon (Ethilon), and a continuous 10/0 nylon (Ethilon)
under a conjunctival flap (Luntz and Livingston,
1976).
Adding
theseto ourpresently reported
resultsandcomparing them (Tables 2 and 3)onefindsthat
there isnostatistically significant difference.
Theconclusionis thatastigmatism resulting from cataract surgery is not influenced by the suturing technique within the framework of those used inour
studiesor by the choice of material (monofilament, nylon, or virgin silk). It may be influenced by the
typeofincision (Bedrossianetal., 1969). A standard incision was used in all thesestudies, although the site of the incision
changed
from the scleral side of the limbus to the corneal side of the limbus. This factor is at presentbeing investigated.This work was supported by a grant from the
University of the Witwatersrand Senate Research
Council.
Results reproduced in Tables 2 and 3 from
'Surgery ofAstigmatism', pp. 226-230 in Advances
in
Ophthalmology,
Vol. 33 (Kager, Basel) and reproduced with permission ofthe editors.References
Lamcke, B., Ehensen, H., and Thiel, H. J. (1971). Corneal
astigmatismafter cataractextraction withcorneal section
and continuoussuture.Berichte der Deutschen Ophthalmo-logischenGesesellschaft, 71, 242-245.
Boke, W.,Thiel,H.J.,Hubuer,H., andLamcke, B. (1971).
Further experiences with corneal section and continuous
suture in cataract operations. Berichte der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft, 71, 712-717.
Troutman, R. C. (1973). Microsurgical control of corneal
astigmatism incataract and keratoplasty. Transactions of the AmericanAcademy of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngol-ogy, 77,563-571.
Luntz, M. H., and Livingston,D. G. (1976). Astimatismin cataractsurgery.Advances inOphthalmology, 33, 226-230. Ryan, Stephen J., and Maumenee, Edward A. (1973). The
running shoestringsuturein cataract surgery. Ophthalmic
Surgery, 4, 12-14.
Bedrossian,P.B., Sabater, G., and Troutman, R. C. (1969). Inducedastigmatism as a result of surgery. Proceedings of the Ist South African International Ophthalmological Symposium, pp. 219-225. Edited by M. H. Luntz, Butterworth:Kent.