R E S E A R C H
Open Access
On certain univalent functions with missing
coefficients
Yi-Ling Cang
1and Jin-Lin Liu
2**Correspondence: [email protected] 2Department of Mathematics,
Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, 225002, P.R. China
Full list of author information is available at the end of the article
Abstract
The main object of the present paper is to show certain sufficient conditions for univalency of analytic functions with missing coefficients.
MSC: 30C45; 30C55
Keywords: analytic; univalent; subordination
1 Introduction
LetA(n) be the class of functions of the form
f(z) =z+anzn+an+zn++· · · (n= , , . . .), (.) which are analytic in the unit diskU={z:|z|< }. We writeA() =A.
A functionf(z)∈Ais said to be starlike in|z|<r(r≤) if and only if it satisfies
Rezf
(z)
f(z) >
|z|<r. (.)
A functionf(z)∈Ais said to be close-to-convex in|z|<r(r≤) if and only if there is a starlike functiong(z) such that
Rezf
(z)
g(z) >
|z|<r. (.)
Letf(z) andg(z) be analytic inU. Then we say thatf(z) is subordinate to g(z) inU, writtenf(z)≺g(z), if there exists an analytic functionw(z) inU, such that|w(z)| ≤ |z|
andf(z) =g(w(z)) (z∈U). Ifg(z) is univalent inU, then the subordinationf(z)≺g(z) is equivalent tof() =g() andf(U)⊂g(U).
Recently, several authors showed some new criteria for univalency of analytic functions (see,e.g., [–]). In this note, we shall derive certain sufficient conditions for univalency of analytic functions with missing coefficients.
For our purpose, we shall need the following lemma.
Lemma(see [, ]) Let f(z)and g(z)be analytic in U with f() =g().If h(z) =zg(z)is starlike in U and zf(z)≺h(z),then
f(z)≺f() + z
h(t)
t dt. (.)
2 Main results
Our first theorem is given by the following.
Now it follows from (.) and (.) that
Next we derive the following.
Theorem Let f(z) =z+anzn+· · · ∈Sn(β).Then,for z∈U,
Applying Lemma to (.), we get
z f(z)
(n–)
+ (n– )!an≺βz (z∈U). (.)
By using the lemma repeatedly, we finally have
z f(z)
+ (n– )anzn–≺βz (z∈U). (.)
According to a result of Hallenbeck and Ruscheweyh [, Theorem ], (.) gives
Finally, we discuss the following theorem.
Theorem Let f(z)∈Sn(β)and have the form
f(z) =z+an+zn++an+zn++· · · (z∈U). (.)
(i) If √
≤β≤,thenf(z)is starlike in|z|< n
β·
n√ ;
(ii) If√ – ≤β≤,thenf(z)is close-to-convex in|z|<n √–
β .
Proof If we put
p(z) =z f(z)
f(z) = +pnz
n+· · · (z∈U), (.)
then by (.) and the proof of Theorem withan= , we have
zp(z) = –z
z f(z)
≺βz. (.)
It follows from the lemma that
p(z)≺ +βz, (.)
which implies that
zff((zz))–
≤β|z|n (z∈U). (.)
(i) Let √
≤β≤ and
|z|<r= n
β ·
√n
. (.)
Then by (.), we have
argz
f(z)
f(z)
<arcsin√
. (.)
Also, from (.) in Theorem withan= , we obtain
f(zz)– <β r
n
(.)
and so arg z
f(z) <√
Therefore, it follows from (.) and (.) that
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
The authors have made the same contribution. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Author details
1Department of Mathematics, Suqian College, Suqian, Jiangsu 223800, P.R. China.2Department of Mathematics,
Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, 225002, P.R. China.
Acknowledgements
Dedicated to Professor Hari M Srivastava.
We would like to express sincere thanks to the referees for careful reading and suggestions, which helped us to improve the paper.
Received: 12 January 2013 Accepted: 23 March 2013 Published: 3 April 2013
References
1. Dziok, J, Srivastava, HM: Certain subclasses of analytic functions associated with the generalized hypergeometric function. Integral Transforms Spec. Funct.14, 7-18 (2003)
2. Nunokawa, M, Obradoviˇc, M, Owa, S: One criterion for univalency. Proc. Am. Math. Soc.106, 1035-1037 (1989) 3. Obradoviˇc, M, Pascu, NN, Radomir, I: A class of univalent functions. Math. Jpn.44, 565-568 (1996)
4. Owa, S: Some sufficient conditions for univalency. Chin. J. Math.20, 23-29 (1992) 5. Samaris, S: Two criteria for univalency. Int. J. Math. Math. Sci.19, 409-410 (1996) 6. Silverman, H: Univalence for convolutions. Int. J. Math. Math. Sci.19, 201-204 (1996) 7. Yang, D-G, Liu, J-L: On a class of univalent functions. Int. J. Math. Math. Sci.22, 605-610 (1999)
doi:10.1186/1687-1847-2013-89