Dr. Kamran Moosa
Advisor & Past Chairman,
Quality & Productivity Society of Pakistan
T
OWARDS
S
UCCESSFUL
I
MPLEMENTATION
OF
TQM
PAKISTANPart 1
Overview and
State of TQM
in Pakistan
Part 2
TQM
Implementation
Challenges
Contents
2
Journey of Quality
Management in Pakistan
3
PART 1
PAKISTANPopulation
180 M
GDP Contribution
20 % Agriculture
26 % Industry
54 % Services
% Occupation
45 %
Agriculture
21 %
Industry
34 %
Services
Labor Force
60 Million
Capita Income
$ 1256 (2012)
Pakistan
PAKISTAN
Cont…
Literacy Rate
58 %
Primary Schools
155,500 ; Students 20.0 M
Middle & Secondary
70,000 ; Students 9.3 M
Colleges
1,558 ; Students 1.0 M
Universities
135 ; Students 1.4 M
______________________________________________
Overall
227,400 ; Students 31.7 M
5
(Source: Pakistan Economic Survey 2011-2012, GOP)
K. MOOSA, MEQA 2013 CONFERENCE, JEDDAH, SAUDI ARABIAPAKISTAN
PAKISTAN INDUSTRY
5000 Garments
1220 Ginning
750 Finishing
700 Knitwear
456 Spinning
400 Towels
200 Weaving
6
Textile
8800
Manufacturing Units
PAKISTAN
Cont…
725
Tanneries
460
Garments
524
Footwear
348
Gloves
302
Sports/Goods
7
Leather
2360
Manufacturing Units
K. MOOSA, MEQA 2013 CONFERENCE, JEDDAH, SAUDI ARABIA
PAKISTAN
Cont…
77
SUGAR PLANTS
11
FERTILIZERS PLANTS
25
CEMENT PLANTS
87
OIL MILLS
500
STEEL MILLS/RELATED
1129
CHEMICAL PLANTS
750
SOFTWARE
370
CONSTRUCTION
131
ISP’s
Others
Manufacturing
Units
PAKISTAN
Automobile
& Aircraft
Manufacturing Units
Cont…
47
MANUFACTURERS
6
CARS (1 LOCAL)
19
TRUCKS/BUSES
22
MOTORCYCLES
780
DIRECT VENDORS
3
AIRCRAFT OVERHAULING
1
LOCALLY DESIGNED
(JF Thunder)
9
K. MOOSA, MEQA 2013 CONFERENCE, JEDDAH, SAUDI ARABIA
Made in Pakistan
Made in Pakistan
PAKISTAN
10
TQM in Education & Certifications
Certification Bodies (ISO Stds)
20
Academic / Universities
135 universities
Accreditation Bodies (HEC, PEC, PMDC, etc)
TQM as a subject in MBA
SQC in BSc Engineering
MSc in QA/TQM by two institutions
PGD in QA by two institutions
Chambers of Commerce
TQM Bureau, Lahore Chamber of Commerce
& Industry
PAKISTAN 1980s
1990s
2000s
2010s
TQM Growth
TQM Journey in Pakistan
Inspection / Testing
ISO Stds
TQM / TPM
Six Sigma,
SQCC Schools
HEC’s Self Assessment
Big Industry
Automobile,
Defence, Engg.
Textile
Automobile,
Telecom
Banks, Software
Engineering,
Banks, Telecom
universities
11
K. MOOSA, MEQA 2013 CONFERENCE, JEDDAH, SAUDI ARABIA
PAKISTAN 1980s
1990s
2000s
2010s
TQM Growth
TQM Journey in Pakistan
Inspection / Testing
ISO 9000
TQM / TPM
Six Sigma,
SQCC Schools
HEC’s S.A.
Good Lab is good QC
ISO 9000 as a QA Model;
everyone took interest
Criticism on ISO 9000; goals
not met; serious concerns
Quality Circles in
Schools; Six Sigma
picked up; partial
Q’Award
PAKISTAN
•
20 years of outstanding TQM history
•
Quality Circles, Kaizen, JIT, 5S, TPM,
Statistical Process Control
•
50-60 Quality Circles / year
•
8000-9000 Kaizen per year
13
Case 1: Indus Motors Karachi
K. MOOSA, MEQA 2013 CONFERENCE, JEDDAH, SAUDI ARABIA
PAKISTAN
•
2007: Initiative of Quality Circles / TQM in
Education in Northern Region of Pakistan
•
70 institutions involved in SQC as extra
curricular activities
•
Objective: To produce Quality minded
Citizens
•
Annual Convention where students
participate
Case 2: TQM / Students Quality Circles in Schools
Modernage School, Abbottabad
14
PAKISTAN
•
Adopted Bloom’s Taxonomy as a Basic
Learning Quality; i.e. 6 Levels
–
Level 1: Remembering
–
Level 2: Understanding
–
Level 3: Applying
–
Level 4: Analyzing
–
Level 5: Evaluating
–
Level 6: Creating
•
Adopted TQM/SQC in curriculum, Exams,
and Teaching Methods
•
Personality Development
•
New Initiative ‘Industrial Kid’; industry
liaison at school level
Case 3: TQM in School:
SPS School & College, Swat
15
K. MOOSA, MEQA 2013 CONFERENCE, JEDDAH, SAUDI ARABIA
PAKISTAN
1.
QM / QA deals with improving process based approach to
organizational
performance improvement & standardization,
still at growth level at the
national level
2.
Used in Pakistani industries and organizations as voluntary programs since
1990’s;
20 years of experience in Pakistan
(e.g. ISO Stds).
3.
Only
10-30% success rate
is commonly reported in internal QA programs
(and even in external QA programs)
4.
Too many companies start these initiatives for 1-2 years and then
abandon;
very few cross the 3
rdyear.
Weak Sustainability
5.
Effective implementation of internal QA was found in 15% firms ,
satisfactory in 25%; poor in 60%. Ref: Moosa (2000)
6.
Role of ISO Certifications is weak, need some upgradation
7.
National Quality Award called Prime Minister Quality Award mobilized in
2012. Not yet awarded.
Quality and Productivity
Society of Pakistan
Building a World-Class Pakistan
QPSP Website
QPSP memberships
19
PAKISTAN
•
Forums (monthly Quality Forum)
•
Magazine (Quest for Excellence)
•
Biannual Exams (Certified Quality
Manager – 2 times/year)
•
Collaborations on
–
Conferences (ICQI, with PIQC)
–
Students Quality Circles (Modernage)
–
Prime Minister Quality Award (NPO)
Annual Magazines
21
Conference
Towards Successful
Implementation of TQM
PART 2
PAKISTANDimensions of TQM program
TQM
Tools & MethodsTQM
Cultural ValuesTQM
Models & Frameworks Customer Focus Leadership (for Quality) Vendors Relations Process Approach Systems Approach Data based Analysis Problem solving Continual Improvement Ethics & Social Norms CreativityISO Certifications Quality Awards Business Excellence Models Accreditation Models Quality Function Deployment Failure Mode & Effect Analysis Statistical Process Control Benchmarking Cost of Quality Business Process Reengineering Six Sigma GR&R Design of Experiments Total Productive Maintenance
TQM
Implementation Project Mgt McKinsey/s 4 Levels UMIST’s 5 Levels Crosby’s 5 Stages Ghobadian’s Model Oakland’s Model Technical CulturalPAKISTAN
TQM Culture – the ultimate goal
Successful
TQM Deployment
TQM
Project Management
TQM
Values/Culture
TQM
Frameworks
TQM
Tools
Learning
Processes
Project
Mgt
Processes
Leadership
& Cultural
Processes
25
K. MOOSA, MEQA 2013 CONFERENCE, JEDDAH, SAUDI ARABIA
PAKISTAN
TQM
DevelopmentDeployment
Sustainability
(Continuity)
TQM Development, Deployment & Sustainability
26
PAKISTAN
Studies on TQM Implementation
•
Success and Failure of TQM in Global scenario
–
Most studies confirm improvement in performance due to TQM but very
little on its sustainability;
Singhal’s study (2001) is most prominentOllila (1995), Terziovsk (1999),
–
10-30% success
reported in many studies ;
Oakland (2007), Yui (1995), Beer (2003), Hackman (1995), Caudron (1993), Harari (1993), Korukonda (1999)
•
Success and Failure of TQM in Pakistan
–
Effective implementation was found in 15% firms , satisfactory in 25%;
poor in 60%.
Moosa (2000)
–
100 Conference papers on TQM practices from 1995 to 2010; most
reported problems in implementation and integration with existing
organizational culture.
(Jamshed Khan 2000, lever Brother 2000, Habib Rafiqe (2000), Gillete (2000), saphire Textile (1998), Packages (2000), PTC (2000)
27
K. MOOSA, MEQA 2013 CONFERENCE, JEDDAH, SAUDI ARABIA
PAKISTAN
Success
25%
Failure
75%
Challenge: TQM Failure 75%
PAKISTAN EFFE C TI V EN ES S
1ST Year 2nd Year 3rd Year
Starter
Amateur
Mature
10-20%
80-90%
TQM Maturity over years
Development
Phase Starts
Deployment
Phase Starts
Sustainability
Phase Starts
29
K. MOOSA, MEQA 2013 CONFERENCE, JEDDAH, SAUDI ARABIA
PAKISTAN
How can you standardize an SOP ?
HANDWASHING
Sustainability = Quality x Time
31
Compliance to
Processes
Suppliers
Organization
Products & Services
IT
Part time faculty SoftwareMnt
PAKISTANExamples
Competency Rate Duration of vacant posts % of Poor Hiring Number of persons hiredNumber of Trainings
HRD
Error Rate Delays Cost of unit test Number of tests Types of Tests
TESTING
DEPT.
% Defectives/Rejected Cost of Production/item Number of items/unit time Number items producedTypes of products produced
PRODUCTION
DEPT.
Graduate Competency Rate Job Placement Rate % of Satisfied Graduates % of Satisfied Employers Number of Students Number of Teachers Number of Programs Number of Branches
UNIVERSITY
Delivery Rate Damage Rate Transactions/day/person Number of LettersNumber of Post Offices Number of Transactions
POST OFFICE
Quality
Objectives
TQM dashboard (Example)
33
PAKISTAN
Quality, QA and Org’l Culture
Quality
Outcomes
KPIs
Due to Poor Culture of Standardization Due to Poor Culture ofCreativity & Involvement Standardization Culture of
Needs improvement
Culture of Creativity & Involvement
Needs improvement
34
PAKISTAN
I
MPROVEMENT
To ImprovePERFORMANCE
S
TANDARDIZATION
To StrengthenSYSEMS
TQM
TQM Key Objectives
Effective Development,
Training, Enforcement
Auditing of
SOPs
Effective Development,
Training, Enforcement
Auditing of
KPIs
70-80%
20-30%
35
K. MOOSA, MEQA 2013 CONFERENCE, JEDDAH, SAUDI ARABIA
What TQM does 70/20/10
0
1
2
3
4
5
STOP
(Processes Not followed)1
PROCESS CONTROL Process Not effective2
PROCESS IMPROVEMENT WITH PROBLEM SOLVING Process Not suitable3
PROCESS CHANGEAnalysis
Incidences
PAKISTAN
A
C
B
3 6 9 12 18
Time (months)
Acceptable
Satisfactory
Good
Excellent
60%
15%
25%
37
ISO 9000 Survey
K. MOOSA, MEQA 2013 CONFERENCE, JEDDAH, SAUDI ARABIA
PAKISTAN 90 70 60 50 40 30 15 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
P
ro
d
u
ctio
n
S
ale
s
P rod. P la nni ngF
inan
ce
QA
M
ar
ke
ting
Desi
g
n
Quality Practices in Departments
%
38
ISO 9000 Survey (Cont.)
PAKISTAN 95 85 80 30 25 25 25 20 15 10 5 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 IS O 9 0 0 0 SPC C . S u rv e y QC C B e n c h m a rk ing R e e n g ine e ring Q. A w a rd Kaiz e n /5 S Q PD J IT Ne w M g t T o o ls
%
39
ISO 9000 Survey (Cont.)
Application of TQM Tools
K. MOOSA, MEQA 2013 CONFERENCE, JEDDAH, SAUDI ARABIA
PAKISTAN
TQM Aspects vs Intermediate & Final Impacts
40
(Final)
PAKISTAN
TQM survey 2010
Responses of Items with p<0.05
K. MOOSA, MEQA 2013 CONFERENCE, JEDDAH, SAUDI ARABIAPAKISTAN
42
Responses of Items with p<0.05
TQM survey 2010
PAKISTAN
43
Responses of Items with p<0.05
TQM survey 2010
K. MOOSA, MEQA 2013 CONFERENCE, JEDDAH, SAUDI ARABIA
PAKISTAN
PAKISTAN
45
TQM survey 2010
K. MOOSA, MEQA 2013 CONFERENCE, JEDDAH, SAUDI ARABIA
PAKISTAN
Categorization of Contextual Factors
•Leadership of TQM Program
•Size of Organization
A Category
Most Influencing
•Effectiveness of ISO 9000
•Formally Adoption of QA System in firm
•Job Positions
B Category
Medium Influencing •Export orientation •Location of Firms •Sectors •Type of FirmsC Category
Little influencing •Experiences of Employees •Background of Employees •Age of EmployeesD Category
Least influencing46
PAKISTAN
Making TQM Programs Sustainable
K. MOOSA, MEQA 2013 CONFERENCE, JEDDAH, SAUDI ARABIA