• No results found

Framework for Understanding & Improving Urban Environmental Sustainability

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Framework for Understanding & Improving Urban Environmental Sustainability"

Copied!
21
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Daniel M. Kammen

Framework for Understanding & Improving

Urban Environmental Sustainability

Presentation for the National Academies’ Workshop on Urban Environmental Sustainability

Co-Director of the

February 6 & 7, 2006

QuickTime™ and a TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor

(2)

The BIE works with

43 undergraduate programs

55 graduate programs

with foci and/or faculty in the environment

Cross cutting themes • Water & Society

• Climate Change & Society • Population & Environment • Genomics • Environmental Monitoring • Green Business • Governance • Media • Emerging Technologies Issue Areas • Air Quality • Water • Land Use

• Biological & natural sciences • Energy & Climate

• Public Health • Engineering

• Planning & Design • Policy, Law & Business • Environmental History

Dr. Sharima Rasanayagam Academic Coordinator

Formerly US West Coast Consul for Science, Technology, Energy and Environment for the UK Government

Inez Fung Co-Director

Professor

Department of Earth & Planetary Science

Environmental Science and Policy Management Director, Berkeley Atmospheric Sciences Center

Dan Kammen Co-Director

Class of 1935 Distinguished Professor Energy and Resources Group

Goldman School of Public Policy

Director, Renewable & Appropriate Energy Laboratory (RAEL)

Chris Jones, Specialist

Malini Ranganathan, Graduate Student ResearcherJessica Huang, Intern

QuickTime™ and a TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor

(3)
(4)

If cities continue to grow and industrialize

using existing technology & practices, the

Earth’s fundamental life-support systems will

be increasingly at risk and under stress.

Motivation: From Science & Best Practices

to Action and Evaluation

Global scientific capacity is not being

channeled to meet the unique challenges of

mid-sized cities, where the pressures of

growth are strongest and capacity is

weakest.

Action: target research on these issues

while partnering and building the

capacity to put these findings into

practice

(5)

1) Institutional Capacity

to capture benefits from existing technology,

policies & management practices

2) Technology, Policy & Management Options

appropriate for their populations & natural

environments

3) Financial Resources

which are frequently dependent upon points 1 & 2

What Cities Critically Need

(6)

Buildings Horvath/ Nazaroff Transportation Madanat/Deakin/ Schipper Sanitation Nelson/Ray Energy Kammen/Farrell Environmental Planning

Fraker, Howarth, Allen Consumption

Jones/Horvath

Land Use Policy Roy

Berkeley Interdisciplinarity & Project Teams

Rural areas Shapiro/Osborne Air quality Cohen Economics Norgaard Human Health Walsh/Bright Water quality Resh/Hayes/Dracup

Professor Harrison Fraker, Dean, College of Environmental Design

Professor Samer Mandant, Director, Institute of Transportation Studies Professor Kara Nelson, Department of Civil Engineering

(7)

Localized pollution & traffic congestion

Consumption of energy &

resources Household

sanitation

Generalized Model of “Sustainability” Priorities

(8)

Environmental Footprint

Localized pollution & traffic congestion

Consumption of energy & resources Household sanitation Household Sanitation + Pollution/congestion + Energy & resources

=

critical stage

(9)

Localized pollution & traffic congestion

Consumption of energy & resources Household sanitation Environmental Footprint Household Sanitation + Pollution/congestion + Energy & resources

=

MID-City

(10)
(11)

Environmental Footprint

(12)

Development w/ improved institutions w/ technology transfer w/ UCB technology w/ long-term investment in promising technology Environmental Footprint w/ global innovation & information network

(13)

Transportation*

Berkeley Research Teams

Water

Infrastructure

1. Drinking water/ Waste water/ Sanitation (Nelson/Ray) 2. Watershed processes/Ecological health/biological resources (Resh/ Hayes/Dracup/Harris) 3. Institutional capacity (Harris/Kocher) 1. Balancing mobility & accessibility 2. Sustainability of urban structures 3. Traffic safety 4. Green logistics 5. Congestion mitigation * Partner: EMBARQ 1. Green Buildings (Horvath/Nazaroff)

2. Air quality monitoring

(Cohen) 3. Environmental Footprinting (Jones/Horvath) 4. Human Health (Walsh/Bright/Banerjee) 5. Renewable Energy (Kammen) 6. Rural Linkages (Shapiro/Osborne)

7. Natural Disasters & Risk

(Allen)

8. Urban Settlements

(Fraker, Roy)

Nelson Madanat & Deakin Fraker & Cohen

Teams will begin a process of identifying other US-based resource teams to invite into the project

(14)

Training Tools Assessment Tools Planning and Action Tools

Remote sensing

software and real-time measurements

Lifecycle assessment tool, water, air, waste, and

economic planning tools

example example example

Examples from UCB MID-Cities Toolkit

Best-practices interactive

(15)

Training & Informational Tools

example

The Berkeley Urban Sustainability Science Toolkit

The Urban Sustainability Initiative

Best-practices map

• Promising Practices Case Studies Website (pictured)

• Sustainability science books, reports • Training manuals

• Instructional videos

(16)

Monitoring & Assessment Tools

example

The Berkeley Urban Sustainability Science Toolkit

The Urban Sustainability Initiative

Remote sensing software

1. Comprehensive set of sustainability indicators 2. Innovative water monitoring methods

• cost-effective stream invertebrates sampling 3. Remote pollution sensing

4. Urban sustainability indicators software • air pollution inventory

• societal cost of traffic accidents, congestion… • Lifecycle assessment software

(17)

Interactive Planning Tools

example

The Berkeley Urban Sustainability Science Toolkit

The Urban Sustainability Initiative

Lifecycle assessment tool

1. Allow users to test outcomes of planning scenarios 2. User-friendly, open-source models

3. A suite of tools for many applications

• Neighborhood development, transportation systems, buildings, water systems, etc.

4. Allows cities to weigh tradeoffs in single platform 5. Links to detailed information

6. Useful in local as well as national-level policy-making (with major potential in China)

(18)

Hypothetical Sequence of Events. Learning and Exchange in MID-Cities Launch & Visioning Conference Team formation Goal setting, Benchmarking International City Tour Year 2 Parallel Work Groups, national Work Group Seminars (International) Regional or international conference Year 4. Parallel Work Groups, national Year 3 Team review of Goals and Benchmarks

Urban Age Institute Capacity Building Programs

(19)
(20)

Resources

Urban Sustainbility Project, Berkeley Institute of the

Environment

http://bie.berkeley.edu

Urban Age Instiute

http://urbanage.com

Healty Communities Foundation

http://www.hcf.org

(21)

Towards a Project Process Model – “Living Laboratories”

Evaluation of information, capacity

and technologies

Expansion to other cities Integrated &

Participatory Management

Planning

Environmental Monitoring 1. Catalog existing data 2. Select UCB Indicators 4. Monitor sustainability

Technology (& practices) 1. Catalog existing tech. 2. Identify promising tech. 3. Develop emerging tech. 4. Invest in long-term tech.

Policy & Management 1. Identify barriers

2. Identify policy options 3. What works and why?

Resources

1. Monitoring tools 2. Improved Tech. 3. Mgt. Tools

Other Initiatives

Private & public finance City Networks NGOs, CBOs Multi-lateral Institutions UCB - HCN National Academies Global Network Information Network Web-based tools City Exchanges Networking

Health Com. Network Project Partners

Pilot cities

Berkeley Group Capacity Building

1. Catalog existing science, technology & policy

2. Identify priority areas 3. Capacity Building Prog.

UCB – Urban Age

Training & Info

1. Manuals/reports 2. Workshops 3. Exchanges 1. Funding 2. Information 3. Networking

References

Related documents

Finally, by running Hausman (1978) specification tests on the results, significant differences between the fixed effects and random.. fixed effects model specification provides

We selected the best variable star candidates and compiled them in the TSVSC1 ( TAROT Suspected Variable Star Catalog, ver. 1), which also contains Fourier- series coefficients that

The model for the islanded MG is developed in the MATLAB/SIMULINK software (version 2017a, MathWorks, MA, USA), while the GOA coding has been undertaken in the MATLAB command

Through two studies of fans who identified with the collective known as NASCAR (the National Association for Stock Car Auto Racing hereafter referred to as Nascar), we examine

or virtual host mobility on SEATTLE performance, we ran- domly move hosts between access switches. 0 and varying inter-arrival times. For high mobility rates, we found SEAT- TLE’s

tegangan keluaran sesuai dengan yang dibutuhkan, tegangan keluaran dari modul catu daya tetap stabil pada saat diberi beban maupun tanpa beban dan dapat dipakai untuk sumber

The way in which lead firms (cigarette manufacturers) demand a certain high grade quality of tobacco through leaf merchant-tobacco grower contract lines is a prime example o f

assess the scientific evidence of possible adverse health effects from electromagnetic fields. WHO will conduct a formal risk assessment of all studied health outcomes from