• No results found

On the difference between the spectral radius and the maximum degree of graphs

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "On the difference between the spectral radius and the maximum degree of graphs"

Copied!
6
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Algebra and Discrete Mathematics RESEARCH ARTICLE Volume24(2017). Number 2, pp. 302–307

© Journal “Algebra and Discrete Mathematics”

On the difference between the spectral radius

and the maximum degree of graphs

Mohammad Reza Oboudi

Communicated by V. Mazorchuk

A b s t r a c t . LetGbe a graph with the eigenvaluesλ1(G)>

· · · > λn(G). The largest eigenvalue of G, λ1(G), is called the

spectral radius of G. Letβ(G) = ∆(G)−λ1(G), where ∆(G) is

the maximum degree of vertices of G. It is known that ifG is a

connected graph, thenβ(G)>0 and the equality holds if and only

ifGis regular. In this paper we study the maximum value and the

minimum value of β(G) among all non-regular connected graphs.

In particular we show that for every tree T with n> 3 vertices,

n−1−√n−1>β(T)>4 sin2( π

2n+2). Moreover, we prove that in

the right side the equality holds if and only ifT ∼=Pn and in the

other side the equality holds if and only ifT ∼=Sn, wherePn and

Sn are the path and the star onnvertices, respectively.

1. Introduction

Throughout this paper all graphs are simple, that is finite and undi-rected without loops and multiple edges. Let G = (V, E) be a simple graph. The order of G denotes the number of vertices of G. For two verticesuandv bye=uv we mean the edgeebetweenu andv. For two graphs G1 = (V1, E1) and G2 = (V2, E2), the disjoint union of G1 and G2 denoted by G1+G2 is the graph with vertex set V1∪V2 and edge set

This research was in part supported by a grant from IPM (No. 95050012). 2010 MSC:05C31, 05C50, 15A18.

(2)

E1∪E2. The graphrGdenotes the disjoint union of r copies of G. For every vertex vV(G), the degreeof v is the number of edges incident with v and is denoted by degG(v). A regular graph is a graph that all of its vertices have the same degree. By ∆(G) we mean the maximum degree of vertices ofG. For two verticesuandv of connected graphG, the distance betweenuandv in Gthat is denoted byd(u, v), is the length of a shortest path betweenu andv. The greatest distance between any two vertices of G is the diameter ofG, denoted by diam(G). Thecomplete graph, thecycle, and thepathof order n, are denoted by Kn, Cn and Pn, respectively. We denote thecomplete bipartite graph with part sizes m andn, byKm,n. Thestarof ordernthat is denoted bySnis the complete bipartite graphK1,n1.

LetGbe a graph with vertex set {v1, . . . , vn}. Theadjacency matrix ofG,A(G) = [aij], is ann×nmatrix such that aij = 1 ifvi andvj are adjacent, and otherwiseaij = 0. ThusA(G) is a symmetric matrix with zeros on the diagonal and all the eigenvalues of A(G) are real. By the eigenvalues ofGwe mean those of its adjacency matrix. We denote the eigenvalues ofG byλ1(G)>· · ·>λn(G). By thespectral radius ofG we meanλ1(G). We note thatλ1(G) is also called the index ofG. It is well known that|λi(G)|6λ1(G), fori= 1, . . . , n. Many papers are devoted to study the characteristic polynomials and spectra of the adjacency matrix of graphs, in particular characterization of graphs by their eigenvalues and finding the location of eigenvalues of graphs, see [1]–[17] and the references therein. Studying the spectral radius of graphs has always been of great interest to researchers in graph theory, for instance see [1], [3], [5], [6], [11] and [13]–[17].

LetGbe a graph. It is a well known fact thatλ1(G)6∆(G). Moreover if G is connected, then the equality holds if and only if G is regular. Therefore it is natural to ask about the value of ∆(G)λ1(G). For a graph G by β(G) we mean β(G) = ∆(G)λ1(G). Hence for every graph G, β(G) > 0. Also if G is connected, then G is regular if and only if β(G) = 0. One can regard β(G) as a parameter that indicates the measure of irregularity of G. There are some papers related this parameter. Cioabă [3] has proved that ifG is a non-regular connected graph of ordern, then ∆(G)λ1(G)> nd1 , where d=diam(G). In this paper we study the maximum value and the minimum value of β(G) among all non-regular graphs. We show among all non-regular graphs the stars have the maximum value ofβ. We prove that for every treeT with n >3 vertices, n1n1 > β(T) > 4 sin2

(3)

and in the other side the equality holds if and only if T ∼=Sn. Finally we conjecture that among all non-regular connected graph the paths have the minimum value ofβ.

2. Results

In this section we obtain the maximum and the minimum value of the difference between the spectral radius and the maximum degree of non-regular connected graphs. We need the following result.

Theorem 1. [4] LetG be a connected graph. If H is a proper subgraph of G, then λ1(G)> λ1(H).

Now we show that among all graphs the stars attain the maximum value of β.

Theorem 2. Let Gbe a graph of order n. Then

β(G)6β(Sn) =n−1− √

n1. Moreover the equality holds if and only if G∼=Sn.

Proof. First we prove the theorem for connected graphs. Let H be a connected graph of ordert. Suppose thatHSt. We show that β(H)< β(St). Fort = 1, there is noting to prove. So lett >2. Let h = ∆(H). Hence h >1. Since Sh+1 is a proper subgraph of H, by Theorem 1 we obtain that

λ1(H)> λ1(Sh+1) = √

h. (1)

For every x >0, let f(x) =xx. This function is increasing on the interval [1

4,∞). Sincet−1>h>1 by (1), β(St) =t−1−

t1 =f(t1)>f(h) =hh > hλ1(H) =β(H). So for connected graphs the result follows. Now assume thatGSn be a non-connected graph of ordern. So ∆(G)6n2. If ∆(G) = 0, there is nothing to prove. Hence 16∆(G)6n2. On the other hand similar to above, one can see that λ1(G)>

p

(4)

Remark 1.For everyn>2, letHn=Kn+K1. Then ∆(Hn) =λ1(Hn) = n1. Therefore β(Hn) = 0 whileHn is not regular. This example shows that the minimum value ofβ(G) among all non-regular graphsGor order n>2 is zero.

In sequel we study the minim value of β(G) among the family of non-regular connected graphsG. We need the following nice upper bound on the spectral radius of trees.

Theorem 3. [14] Let T be a tree with maximum degree. Then λ1(T)<2

√ ∆1.

Theorem 4. Let T be a tree of order n>3. Then β(T)>β(Pn) = 4 sin2

π

2n+ 2

.

Moreover the equality holds if and only ifT ∼=Pn.

Proof. Let n > 3. Since λ1(Pn) = 2 cosnπ+1 and ∆(Pn) = 2, β(Pn) = 22 cosnπ+1 = 4 sin

2

(2+2). For every x > 1, let f(x) = x−2 √

x1. It is easy to see thatf is an increasing function on the interval [2,). Therefore for every x>3,f(x)>32√2. On the other hand it is not hard to see that for everyn>7, 32√2>4 sin2( π

2n+2). Hence for every x>3 andn>7 we obtain that

f(x)>4 sin2 π

2n+ 2

. (2)

One can check the result forn66. Now let n>7. Let TPn be a tree of ordern. We show that β(T) > β(Pn). Since TPn, ∆(T)>3. On the other hand by Theorem 3,λ1(T)<2

p

∆(T)1. Since ∆(T)>3 andn>7, by (2),

β(T) = ∆(T)λ1(T)>∆(T)−2 q

∆(T)1 =f(∆(T))>4 sin2 π

2n+ 2

=β(Pn). This completes the proof.

(5)

Theorem 5. Let T be a tree of order n. Then

β(Pn)6β(T)6β(Sn).

Moreover in the left side the equality holds if and only if T ∼=Pn and in

the other side the equality holds if and only if T ∼=Sn.

We think that among all non-regular connected graphs Gof order n the path Pn has the minimum value ofβ. Hence we pose the following conjecture.

Conjecture 1. Let G be a non-regular connected graph of order n. If GPn, thenβ(G)> β(Pn).

Now we show that the Conjecture 1 is valid for graphs with small diameter.

Theorem 6. [3]LetGbe a non-regular connected graph of ordern. Then ∆(G)λ1(G)>

1 nd,

where d is the diameter ofG.

Theorem 7. Let G be a non-regular connected graph of ordern>3. If d=diam(G)6 10n, then β(G)> β(Pn).

Proof. Since 10> π2, for everyn>1, 10 π2 >(

n n+1)

2

. On the other hand for n > 1, 2+2 > sin(

π

2n+2). Hence for every n >1, 10

n2 >4(2+2) 2 >

4 sin2 ( π

2n+2). This shows that 1 nd >

10

n2 >4 sin

2 ( π

2n+2). Therefore for every n>3, by Theorem 6 we obtain that

∆(G)λ1(G)> 1

nd >4 sin 2 π

2n+ 2

=β(Pn). The proof is complete.

Remark 2. One can see that for everyn>2,λ1(Kn\e) = n−3+

n2+2n−7 2 where eis an edge ofKn, see [8]. Therefore limn→∞(β(Kn\e)) = 0.

References

[1] R.A. Brualdi, A.J. HoIman, On the spectral radius of a (0,1) matrix, Linear Algebra and its Applications,65(1985) 133–146.

(6)

[3] S.M. Cioabă, The spectral radius and the maximum degree of irregular graphs, The Electronic Journal of Combinatorics14(2007), #R38.

[4] D.Cvetković, P. Rowlinson, S. Simić, An introduction to the theory of graph spectra, London Mathematical Society Student Texts, 75, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2010.

[5] K.Ch. Das, P. Kumar, Some new bounds on the spectral radius of graphs, Discrete Mathematics281(2004) 149–161.

[6] G.J. Ming, T.Sh.Wang, On the spectral radius of trees, Linear Algebra and its Applications329(2001) 1–8.

[7] M.R. Oboudi, Bipartite graphs with at most six non-zero eigenvalues, Ars Mathematica Contemporanea11(2016) 315–325.

[8] M.R. Oboudi, Characterization of graphs with exactly two non-negative eigen-values, Ars Mathematica Contemporanea12(2017) 271–286.

[9] M.R. Oboudi, Cospectrality of complete bipartite graphs, Linear and Multilinear Algebra64(2016) 2491–2497.

[10] M.R. Oboudi, Energy and Seidel energy of graphs, MATCH Communications in Mathematical and in Computer Chemistry75(2016) 291–303.

[11] M.R. Oboudi, On the eigenvalues and spectral radius of starlike trees, Aequationes Mathematicae. DOI: 10.1007/s00010-017-0533-4.

[12] M.R. Oboudi, On the third largest eigenvalue of graphs, Linear Algebra and its Applications503(2016) 164–179.

[13] L. Shi, Bounds on the (Laplacian) spectral radius of graphs, Linear Algebra and its Applications422(2007) 755–770.

[14] D. Stevanović, Bounding the largest eigenvalue of trees in terms of the largest vertex degree, Linear Algebra and its Applications360(2003) 35–42.

[15] D. Stevanović, I. Gutman, M.U. Rehman, On spectral radius and energy of complete multipartite graphs, Ars Mathematica Contemporanea9(2015) 109– 113.

[16] B. Wu, E. Xiao,Y. Hong, The spectral radius of trees on kpendant vertices, Linear Algebra and its Applications395(2005) 343–349.

[17] A. Yu, M.Lu, F. Tian, On the spectral radius of graphs, Linear Algebra and its Applications387(2004) 41–49.

C o n ta c t i n f o r m at i o n

M. R. Oboudi Department of Mathematics, College of Sciences, Shiraz University, Shiraz, 71457-44776, Iran; School of Mathematics, Institute for Research in Fundamental Sciences (IPM), P.O. Box: 19395-5746, Tehran, Iran

E-Mail(s):[email protected], [email protected]

References

Related documents

Long term treatment with only metformin and pioglitazone and in combination with irbesartan and ramipril significantly ( P &lt;0.001) reduced elevated serum

It was decided that with the presence of such significant red flag signs that she should undergo advanced imaging, in this case an MRI, that revealed an underlying malignancy, which

It is expressed on a fraction of pro-B (pre-BI) cells and most large pre-B(II) cells, and has been implicated in IgH chain allelic exclusion and down-regulation of the

There are infinitely many principles of justice (conclusion). 24 “These, Socrates, said Parmenides, are a few, and only a few of the difficulties in which we are involved if

19% serve a county. Fourteen per cent of the centers provide service for adjoining states in addition to the states in which they are located; usually these adjoining states have

between such efforts as illiteracy eradication and the formal system of education. Communicative channels between both were not envisaged.. It clearly defines the

There shall be a total of five Board members representing Aboriginal organizations, one for Aboriginal organizations in each of British Columbia, Alberta,

Design parameters for pattern reconfigurable Quasi-Yagi Stacked ARMSP Antenna with broadband characteristics and improved