• No results found

Serotype Distribution, Population Structure, and Antimicrobial Resistance of Group B Streptococcus Strains Recovered from Colonized Pregnant Women

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Serotype Distribution, Population Structure, and Antimicrobial Resistance of Group B Streptococcus Strains Recovered from Colonized Pregnant Women"

Copied!
11
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

Loading

Figure

FIG 1 Serotype and MLST distribution of colonizing group B Streptococcus isolates from metropolitanToronto
FIG 2 Phylogenetic relationships of colonizing and invasive serotype IV ST459 group B Streptococcusisolates from metropolitan Toronto and regions of the United States
FIG 3 Recombination leading to serotype switching in colonizing group B Streptococcus strains
TABLE 1 Antibiotic susceptibility profiles of GBS colonizing isolates from metropolitanToronto

References

Related documents

Findings show that photorealistic rendering was rated highest for visual appeal, suitability, and accuracy of representation of the architectural style, design elements and

chapter, three power blocs, “the white supremacist power bloc,” “the patriarchy power bloc,” and “the class elitist power bloc,” are conceptualized as as an ever-shifting set

The stem diameter response of Gmelina seedlings to cassava peels organic fertilizer application as assessed from week 1 to week 8.. Similar findings have been reported

Overall, given the signs of the mean rounding and the corresponding skewness statistics for the categories of food products and beverages, cosmetic, soap and

Despite its success, the TBAFS had no formal engagement from the Indigenous communities that make up almost 13% of Thunder Bay’s population (the highest urban Indigenous

Specific actions should be taken for (i) growth and retention of IT industry in the city, (ii) attracting more participants to IT industry, (iii) attracting investments from

This study found a significant increase in the agricultural injury rate per 100,000 hired workers, ranchers, and farm operators who were treated at a Level I, II, or III