• No results found

INTEGRAL TRANSFORMS OF (3 M)-PARAMETRIC MULTI-INDEX MITTAG- LEFFLER FUNCTION

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "INTEGRAL TRANSFORMS OF (3 M)-PARAMETRIC MULTI-INDEX MITTAG- LEFFLER FUNCTION"

Copied!
12
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

G LOBAL J OURNAL OF E NGINEERING S CIENCE AND R ESEARCHES

INTEGRAL TRANSFORMS OF (3 M)-PARAMETRIC MULTI-INDEX MITTAG- LEFFLER FUNCTION

Jitendra Daiya*1and Jeta Ram2

*1,2

Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur

ABSTRACT

The object of this paper is to evaluate the Euler, Laplace, Whittaker, K- transform and fractional Fourier transform of order α, 0 < α ≤ 1, of the (3m)-parametric multi-index Mittag-Leffler function defined by Paneva-Konovska [6].

The results established in this paper would provide extensions of those given in earlier works. The result obtained is useful applied problem of science and engineering.

Mathematics Subject Classification: 33E12, 33C40

Keywords- Parametric multi-index Mittag-Leffler function Euler transform, Laplace transform, Whittaker transform, k- transform, fractional Fourier transform, generalized wright function.

I. INTRODUCTION

The (3m)-parametric multi-index Mittag-Leffler function introduced by Paneva-Konovska [6] is defined as

( ), ( ),( )

0

( ) ( )

( ) ( ) ( !)

i i

i i i i

m k k

k m

E z z

k k

 

 

   

1

1 1

0

( ) . . . ( ) ( ) ( ). . . ( ) ( !)

m

m m

k k k

k m

z

k k k

 

   

     

(1)

; , ,

i i i

; Re( ) 0,

i

1, 1, 2, . . . . k R      C   mim

where

( ) 

k is the pochhammer symbol

1 ; ( 0; \{0})

( )

( )

k

( ) ( 1) . . . ( 1) ; ( ; )

k C

k

k k n N C

 

     

 

  

          

Particular cases

(i) For

m  1,

equation (1) reduces to the generalized Mittag-Leffler function [7]

,1

, ,

0

( ) ( )

( ) ( )

( ) !

k k

k

E z z E z

k k

 

   

 

 

 

(2)

(ii) For

  1,

equation (2) reduces to the Mittag-Leffler function [5]

(2)

1, , 0

(1) ( )

( ) ( )

( ) !

k k

k

E z z E z

k k  

   

 

 

(3)

(iii) For

  1,

equation (3) reduces to the Mittag-Leffler function [4]

,1 0

(1) ( )

( ) ( )

( 1) !

k k

k

E z z E z

k k

  

 

 

(4)

More detail about Mittag-Leffler function and their application can be found in the paper by Saxena et al [9, 10, and 11].

The following definitions are also needed in the analysis that follows:

Definition 1 Euler Transform

The Euler transform of the function

f z ( )

is defined as

1 1 1

0

{ ( ) ; , }

a

(1 )

b

( ) , , Re ( ) 0, Re ( ) 0

B f z a b   z

z

f z dz a b Cab

(5)

Definition 2:

Laplace Transform

The Laplace transform of the function

f t ( )

, denoted by F (s) is defined by the equation

0

( ) ( ) ( ) { ( ) ; }

st

( ) Re ( ) 0

F s Lf s L f t s e f t dt s

    

(6)

which may be symbolically written as

 

( ) { ( ) ; } ( )

1

( ) ; F sL f t s or f tL

F s t

provided that the function f t

( )

is continuous for

t  0

and if exponential order as

t   .

Definition 3 Let

u u t  ( )

be a function of the space

S R ( )

, the Schwartzian space of the function that decay rapidly at infinity together with all derivatives.

The Fourier transform is given by the integral

ˆ ( ) [ ] ( ) ( ) exp ( )

u    u   

U t i t dt

(7)

and the inverse Fourier transform can be defined as

(3)

 

1

ˆ ( ) 1 ˆ ( ) exp ( )

2

R

u t ui t d  

  

(8)

Definition 4 (Lizorkin space) : LetV R

( )

be the set of functions

( )

( ) ( ) :

n

(0) 0, 0,1,2,... .

V R    S R   n

(9)

The Lizorkin space of function

 ( )

R is defined as

 

( ) R S R ( ) : [ ] V R ( ) .

      

(10)

Definition 5: Let u be a function belonging to

 ( ). R

The Fractional Fourier transform of the order

 , 0    1

is defined by

ˆ ( ) [ ]( )

i 1/ t

( )

u w   u   

R

e

u t dt

(11)

If put

  1,

equation (11) reduces to the conventional Fourier transform and for

  0,

it reduces to the Fractional Fourier Transform defined by Luchko et al [2].

Lemma 1 Let u be a function of the space

 ( ), R

let

be a real number,

0    1,

then

[ ]( ) u [ ]( ), u x for x 1/

  

  

(12)

The inverse Fractional Fourier transform of the order

 , 0    1, u   ( ) R

is defined as

 

1/ 1

1

ˆ ( ) ( ) 1 ˆ ( )

2

i t

u t

R

e u dw

      



 

  

(13)

The following result will be required in evaluating the integral (22).

1/2 1 , 0

(1/ 2 ) (1/ 2 )

( ) Re( ) 1/ 2.

(1 )

e t

W

 

t dt      

 

  

         

  

(14)

where the Whittaker function

W

 ,

( ) z

is defined in [1](see also Mathai et al [3])

(4)

, , ,

( 2 ) (2 )

1 1

2 2

( ) ( ) ( )

W

 

z M

 

z M

 

z

   

  

  

 

      

   

   

(15)

where

M  

,

( ) z

is defined as

1/2 1/2

, 1 1

1

( ) ; 2 1 ; .

2

M

 

zz

e

z

F         z  

Mathai et al [3, p. 54, Eq. 2.37] defined result will be used in evaluating the integral (27).

1 2

0

( ) 2 Re( ) 0.

t K a x dx a   2 a

 

        

(16)

The generalized Wright hypergeometric function p

q

  z

is defined by Wright [13-15] (also see [12, p 21]) in the following form:

   

   

1 1

1 1

, ,..., , , ,..., , ;

p p

q q

p q

a A a A

b B b B Z

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

Γ Γ a b A B n nz n

n

!

0

n q

1

j j j

p 1

i i i

 

 

 

 

(17)

where

a

i

, b

j

 C

and

A

i

, B

j

Ri 1 , .. .. , p ; j 1 , . .. , q

and the defining series (17) converges for

. p 1

1 i A i q

1

j B j  

 

Definition 6: Let

i

 0,  

i

,

i

C ; 

i

 0, 1, 2, . . .   for i  1, 2,..., . m

Then the multi-index Mittag- Leffler functions (1) are Wright’s generalized hypergeometric functions of the form given by [6, theorem 3, p 1093]

     

1 1

1

( ), 1 ( ),( ) 2 1

1

, 1 , . . . , , 1 ( ) ;

, , . . . , , , (1,1), . . . ,(1,1)

i i i i

m m

m m

m

m m

i

E z z

 

 

    

 

 

 

    

 

 

    

(18)

Theorem 1. (Euler Transform): If

k R m  ;  1;     

i

, , , ,

i i

C ;Re( ) 0, 

i

i  1,2,..., , m

then

1

 

1 1 ( ),

( ),( ) 0

(1 )

i

i i

z

z

E  

m

xz d z

(5)

 

     

1 1

1

 

1 2

1

, 1 ,. . . , 1 , ,

( ) ;

, ,. . . ,

m

,

m

, (1,1),. . . ,(1,1),( , )

i

m

m m

m

i

    x

      

 

    

  

 

 

(19)

Proof : - Using equation (1) and (5), it gives

1  

1 1 ( ),

( ),( ) 0

(1 )

i

i i

z z E

m

xz dz

1 1 1

0 0

( ) ( )

(1 )

( ) ( !)

i

i i

k k k m

z z xz dz

k k

   

 

  

 

 

 

1 1 1

0 0

( ) ( )

(1 ) ( ) ( !)

i

i i

k k

k k m

x z z dz

k k

  

 

   

 

 

 

0

( ) ( ) ( ) ( )

( ) ( !) ( )

i

i i

k k k m

x k

k k k

   

    

  

      

 

0

1

( ) ( )

( ) ( )

( ) ( ) ( !)

i

i i

i

k

m m

k i

k k x

k k k

  

    

   

 

    

 

This completes the proof of the Theorem 1.

(6)

Corollary 1.1 For

m  1,

equation (19) reduces in the following form given by Saxena [8]

      

1 1 1

2 2 0 ,

, 1 , ,

( ) ;

(1 )

, ,( , )

z z E   xz dz     x

     

      

     

(20)

Theorem 2. (LaplaceTransform): If

k R m  ;  1;     

i

, , , ,

i i

C ; Re ( ) 0, Re ( ) 0, s  

i

1, 2,..., x 1,

i m and

s

 

then

 

1 ( ),

( ),( ) 0

i

i i

sz m

z e E x z dz

  

 

     

   

1

1 1

1 2 1

1

, 1 ,. . . , 1 , ,

, ,. . . ,

m

,

m

(1,1),. . . ,(1,1) ;

i

m

m m

m

i

s x

s

   

   

 

 

 

  

 

  

(21)

Proof : - Using equation (1) and (6) and gamma function formula, we obtain

 

1 ( ),

( ),( ) 0

i

i i

sz m

z e E   xz dz

    1

0 0

( ) ( )

( ) ( !)

i

i i

sz k k

k m

z e xz dz

k k

  

 

 

 

    

1

0 0

( ) ( ) ( ) ( !)

i

i i

k k sz

k k m

x z e dz

k k

  

 

 

  

    

(7)

0

( ) ( ) [ ]

( ) ( !)

i

i i

k k

m k

n

x k

k k s  

  

 

 

 

   

  0

1

( ) [ ] ( )

( ) ( !)

i

i i

i

k

m k m

n i

k k

s x

k s k

  

  

 

   

    

This completes the proof of the Theorem 2.

Corollary 2.1 For

m  1

equation (21) reduces in the following form given by Saxena [8]

       

1 ,

, 2 1 0

, 1 , , , ;

sz

a x

z e E x z dz s

s

 

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

        

(22)

Theorem 3. (Whittaker Transform): If

k R m  ;  1;     

i

, , , ,

i i

C ;Re( ) 0, 

i

i  1,2,..., , m Re ( ) 0, Re (      )   1 / 2 then

 

1 /2 ( ),

, ( ),( )

0

( )

i

i i

pt m

t e W   pt E wt dt

  

 

     

     

1

1 1

2 2

1

, 1 ,. . . , 1 , 1/ 2 ,

, ,. . . ,

m

,

m

,(1,1),. . . ,(1,1), 1 , ;

i

m

m m

m

i

p w

p

    

      

   

 

           

(23)

(8)

 

1 /2 ( ),

, ( ),( )

0

( )

i

i i

pt m

t e W   pt E wt dt

  

1 /2

, 0 0

( ) ( ) ( )

( ) ( ) ( !)

i

i i

k k

pt k

k m

w t

t e W pt dt

k k

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

It we set

pt  

, then above line is equal to

1

/ 2 ,

0 0

( ) ( ) 1

( ) ( ) ( !)

i

i i

k k k k m

e W w d

p k k p p

 

 

   

 

  

   

    

 

    

/ 2 1

,

0 0

( ) ( ) ( )

( ) ( !)

i

i i

k k k

k m

p w e W d

k k p

   

  

   

 

 

   

 

          

0

( ) (1/ 2 ) (1/ 2 )

(1 )

( ) ( !)

i

i i

k k

k m

k k w

p k k k p

 

      

  

 

 

 

       

             

 

0

1

( ) (1/ 2 ) (1/ 2 )

(1 )

( ) ( !)

i

i i

i

k

m m

k i

p k k k w

k k k p

      

  

  

 

 

         

              

This completes the proof of the Theorem 3.

Corollary 3.1 For

m  1,

equation (23) reduces in the following form given by Saxen [8]

(9)

        

1 /2

, , 3 2

0

, 1 , 1/ 2 , ( ) ;

, , 1 ,

pt

p w

t e W pt E wt dt p

 

 

    

   

    

 

 

   

 

          

(24)

Fractional Fourier Transform (FFT) of multi-index (3m-Parametric)Mittag-Leffler function

Theorem 4: If

k R m  ;  1;   

i

, ,

i i

C ;Re( ) 0, 

i

i  1,2,..., , 0 m    1,

for FFT of order

of the multi-index (3m parametric) Mittag-Leffler function

   

1 1 ( 1)/

( ), ( ),( )

1 0

( ) ( ) ( 1) ( 1)

( ) ( ) ( !)

i i

i i i

i i

k k k

m m

k m i

k i k

E t

k k

 

  

 

 

 

      

      

 

              

(25)

Proof : - Using equation (7) and (11) and gamma function formula, it gives

( ),  

(

i

),( ) ( )

i i

E

m

t

 

  

1/

( ),

( ),( )

i

( )

i i

i t m

R e

E t dt

 

1 /

0

( ) ( )

( ) ( !)

i

i i

i t k k

R m

k

e t d t

k k

 

    

1 /

0

( )

( ) ( !)

i

i i

i t k

k

m R

k

e t d t

k k

 

    

If we set

i  1/ t   

, then 0

1/ 1/

0

( )

( ) ( !)

i

i i

k

k m

k

e d

k k i i

  

  

   

 

 

     

                

(10)

1 ( 1) /

0 0

( )

( ) ( ) ( 1) ( !)

i

i i

k k

k k k m

k

e d

k i k

 

  

  

 

 

     

1 ( 1) / 0

( ) ( 1)

( ) ( ) ( 1) ( !)

i

i i

k

k k k m

k

k

k i k

  

 

 

    

1 ( 1) /

0

( ) ( ) ( 1) ( 1)

( ) ( !)

i

i i

k k k

k k m

i k

k k

  

 

    

  

   

This completes the proof of the Theorem 4.

Corollary 4.1 For

m  1,

equation (25) reduces in the following form

 

1 ( 1)/

( ) ( ),( )

0

1 ( ) ( ) ( 1)

( ) ( ) ( )

k k k

k

E t k i

k

 

  

 

   

    

  

 

       

(26)

Theorem 5. (K-Transform):

k R m  ;  1; , , , ,     

i i i

C ;Re( ) 0, 

i

i  1,2,..., , m

then

 

1 ( ), 2

( ),( ) 0

( )

i

i i

t K at E  

m

xt dt

 

 

   

   

1

1 1

2 2

2 2 1 2

1

, 1 ,. . . , 1 , ,

2 2 ; 2

, ,. . . , , ,(1,1),. . . ,(1,1),

i m m

m n

m m

m n

i

p

a x

a

 

   

    

 

 

    

 

   

 

 

 

  

 

(27)

Proof : - Using equation (1) and (16) , we obtain

(11)

 

1 ( ), 2

( ),( ) 0

( )

i

i i

t K at E  

m

xt dt

 

1 2

0 0

( ) ( ) ( )

( ) ( ) ( !)

i

i i

k k

k k m

x t

t K at dt

k k

 

 

 

 

    

2 1

0 0

( ) ( ) ( )( !) ( )

i

i i

k k

k k m

x t K at dt

k k

  

 

 

 

    

2 2 ( 2 )

0

( ) ( ) 2

2 2

( )( !)

i

i i

k k k

k k m

x k

k k a

   

   

 

    

   

        

2 2

0

( ) ( ) 2 2

2 ( )( !) 2

i

i i

k k

k m

k

x k

a k k a

      

 

  

     

            

This completes the proof of the Theorem 5.

Corollary 5.3 For

m  1,

equation (27) reduces in the following form given by Saxena [8]

     

 

1 2 2 2

3 1

, 2

0

,1 , ,

2 2

( ) ; 2

, ,

n n

a x

t K at E x t dt

a

 

  

  

   

  

  

    

 

   

 

 

 

  

 

(28)

II. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

This work is supported by Post-Doctoral Fellowship of the National Board of Higher Mathematics (NBHM) India to author (Jitendra Daiya).

(12)

REFERENCES

1. A. Erdélyi, W. Magnus, F. Oberhettinger, F.G. Tricomi, Tables of Integral Transforms, Vol. 2 McGraw-Hill, New York - Toronto London 1954.

2. Y. Luchko, H. Martinez and J. Trujillo, Fractional Fourier transform and some of its applications. Fractional Calculus & Applied Analysis. An International Journal for Theory and Applications. Vol. 11 No. 4, (2008), 457- 470.

3. A. M. Mathai , R. K. Saxena and H.J. Haubold, The H-function, Theory and Applications, Springer, New York, 2010.

4. G .M. Mittag-leffler, Sur la nouvelle function

E

( x ) ,

C. R. Acad. Sci., Paris 137 (1903), 554-558.

5. G.M. Mittag-Leffler, Sur la representation analytique de’une branche uniforme une function monogene, Acta.

Math., 29(1905), 101-181.

6. J. Paneva-konovska, Multi-index (3m-parametric) Mittag-leffler functions and fractional calculuscomptes rendus de I’Académie bulgare des sciences (mathematiques functions spéciales) Tome 64, No. 8 (2011) 1089- 1098.

7. T.R. Prabhakar, A singular integral equation with a generalized Mittag-Leffler function in the kernel.

Yokohoma Math J. 19 (1971), 7-15.

8. R.K. Saxena, Certain properties of generalized Mittag-Leffler function, Conference of the Society of Special functions & their applications, 3rdannual Conference, 78-81, Chennai, India, 2002.

9. R. K. Saxena , J. Daiya and A Singh, Integral transforms of the k-generalized Mittag-Leffler function , ,,

( ),

E

k  

z

Le Matematiche. (accepted/ in press).

10. R.K. Saxena, T.K Pogany, J. Ram and J. Daiya, Dirichlet average of generalized multi-index Mlttag-Leffler functions, Armenrain J. Math Vol (3) (2010), Issue 4, 174-187.

11. R.K. Saxena, J. Ram and J. Daiya, Generalized fractional calculus of generalized multi-index Mittag-Leffler function, The journal of the Indian academy of mathematics, 34 (2), (2012), 373-385.

12. H. M. Srivastava and Z. Tomovski, Fractional calculus with an integral operator containing a generalized Mittag-Leffler function in the kernel, Appl. Math. Comput., 211 (2009), 198-210.

13. E. M. Wright , The asymptotic expansion of the generalized hypergeometric function. J. London Math. Soc. 10 (1935), 286-293.

14. E. M. Wright , The asympototic expansion of intergral functions defined by Taylor series. Philos. Trans. Roy.

Soc. London, Ser. A 238 (1940), 423-451.

15. E. M. Wright , The asymptotic expansion of the generalized hypergeometric function. Proc. London Math. Soc.

(2) 46 (1940), 389-408.

References

Related documents

This study therefore recommend that Ministry of Labour and Social Protection through the Department of Children Services in the study area should organize for

PDE at the territory formation stage or simply diluting cnrN ⫺ cells rescued the small-territory phenotype of cnrN ⫺ cells, which supports our hypothesis that the small territories

The importance of this research arises from this point, as it aims to cover the gap by analyzing this relationship between logistics performance indicator and its

In our study, radical surgery on extended lesions with bowel resec- tion—where normally the risk of recurrence appears to be higher than in small localised lesions—showed better

The assembly approved the second article which defines the government’s attitude in internal and external point of views, after the election of the Commission was approved that :I.

S ij is the performance score of region i on indicator j. The final RLC scores are listed in the following Table 5-14. It is obvious from Table 5-14 that the best performer in

Patil Amol, PG Student, Department of Quality Assurance, Gangamai College of Pharmacy, North Maharashtra University, Jalgaon (M.S.) India. Warude Kapil:

When bitter orange oil compared with olive oil that is important nutritional and medicinal oil in terms of fat’s index values, we couldn’t reach the result of using bitter