Conductance
fluctuations
in
systems
arith
a
random-magnetic-field
scattering
Vladimir
I.
Pal'koMax-PLanck-Institut fiir Festkorperforschung, Heisenbergstrusse
I,
70569Stuttgart, Germany and Institute ofSoLid State Physics, Russian Academy of Science, ChernogoLovka, I$9$89, Russia(Received 5August 1994)
The perturbation-theory study ofuniversal conductance fluctuations is generalized to systems with electron scattering ina static random magnetic field. Our calculation confirms the intuitive ex-pectation that the amplitude ofQuctuations coincides with the universal value typical for the unitary random-scattering ensemble. An application ofthis result to micrometer-size wires with the two-dlmensional electron liquid near 611ingfactor v
=
1/2q allows us topredict aperiodic Coulomb-type oscillations in this system beyond the Coulomb-blockade regime, which would manifest a correspon-dence between the Aharonov-Bohm and Aharonov-Casher efFects specific tocomposite fermions.I.
INTRODUCTION
The features
of
electron transport in a nonuniform or random magnetic field(RMF)
have been intensively studied during the past few years. Theoretical activi-ties in this direction have been stimulated partly by ex-perimental eKortsto
produce inhomogeneous magnetic fields in high-mobility two-dimensional (2D) semiconduc-tors using external means: surface superconducting or magnetic layers, or an application of a magnetic 6eld parallelto
a
slightly curved heteroboundary.But
mainly, attention has been drawnto
systems withRMF
scattering by recent ' single-particle formalismto
describe strongly correlated 2D electronsat
6lling fac-tors around v=
1/2q in terms offree quasiparticles mov-ing ina
renormalized built-in magnetic 6eld. Accordingto
the composite-fermion theoryof
the &actional quan-tum Hall eKect, ' in the region ofreal magnetic 6eldswhere v
—
2, the liquidof
electrons is equivalentto
an ideal Fermi gasof
quasiparticles (each associated with the charge e and two attached fiux quanta,24o)
moving in an effective magnetic fieldH,
tt=
H
—
HiL2(n,).
The latter is determined both by the external 6eld itself and by the local electron density (Hi~2=
4mn,hc/e), so that the real electron scattering ona
smooth screened ran-dom potential and in a high external magnetic field can be converted into the free quasiparticle scattering on a weak built-in effectiveRMF.
Recent theories
of
electrons in a RMF have concen-trated on the studiesof
the localization problem. Al-though diBerent authors propose diferent scenarios of the localization itself, conclusions drawn from the resultsof
all the methods ' agreeat
the following point: Evenif the particle states are localized
at
T
=
0, the localiza-tion lengthL,
can be long enough(L,
»
l»
Li/p~)to
expect
(at a
finite temperature)a
wide region ofmetallic conductivity where quantum localization corrections are reduced and the transport showsa
dominantly classical behavior.Nevertheless, it is known that, despite magnetic field suppression of the weak localization in macroscopic
systems, is quantum interference effects are still observ-able in small structures. The sample-specific interfer-ence pattern
of
electron waves produces universal con-ductance fiuctuationsii at
the scaleof a
quantum e2/h. One can assume that the same takes place ina
confined system with random-magnetic-field scattering. In what follows, we study conductance Quctuations in conduc-tors where all the disorder is dueto
an irregular mag-netic field. We consider the metallic regime since this one has been discussed in the application to theexist-ing experimental conditions; in particular, the authors of Refs. 15and
19
report the mean-free path /of
com-posite fermions consistent with the value
of
the metallic-ity paraineterpal/5
10—50.
These calculations are de-scribed inSec.
II.
The magneto-conductance Huctuations obtained look the same as universal Huctuations ' ' ina disordered metal subjected
to
a strong magnetic 6eld and confirm an intuitive expectation that the system witha RMF
scattering isa
typical representative ofthe gen-eralized unitary random scattering ensemble.On the other hand, the relation between the flux 240 and the electron charge assigned
to
a
quasiparticle in the composite-fermion liquid near the 6lling factor v=
hasto
be taken into account. The arguments as to howthat can be done are presented in
Sec.
III.
The above-mentioned correspondence forces usto
expect Quctua-tions not only due to a change of real magnetic Auxthrough asample (as has been recently observed by Sim-mons eta/. inamicrostructure with
a
2Dgasat
v=
2),
but also under such gate voltage variation that implants each additional charge bQ 2e into the sample area. Roughly speaking, this could look like aperiodic Coulomb oscillations
if
one would forget that they take place be-yond the Coulomb-blockade regime. The conductance behavior near other higher even-denominator fractions, v=
1/2q, should be similar, but with an important cor-rection: The multiple Aux 2q@0 assignedto
composite fermionsat
v=
1/2q shortens the scale ofa
charge(i.
e.,gate voltage) dependence down
to
the value ofbQ We proposeto
use this feature as a testof
the nontrivial internal structure ofelementary quasiparticles predicted50 CONDUCTANCE FLUCTUATIONS IN SYSTEMS WITH RANDOM-.
.
.
17407by the composite-fermion model
of
the &actional quan-tum Hall effect.rate
r
which enters into the retarded (advanced)single-particle Green's function,
II.
PERTURBATION- THEORY CALCULATIONS
From the technical side, our analysis is based on the perturbation theory,
a
convenient toolto
study the trans-port in the metallic regime. As comparedto
the diagram-matic calculations described in Ref. 16, the technique hasto
be adopted in orderto
include the electron scattering ona
random vector potential (instead of usual impu-rity scattering) andto
account fora
strong anisotropyof
scattering amplitudes, in particular, the dominanceof
a
low-angle scattering. The main partof
what we do below consistsof
the derivation oftwo-particle Green's functions.As the first step, we replace scalar disordered poten-tial vortices in the perturbation-theory calculations~ by an interaction bu
=
v
—
'
witha
planar component ofa
random vector potentiala; v
is the velocity operator. In the plane-wave representation,v
=
(p
+
p')/2m.
The Buctuationsof
the random fielda
can be described us-ing the diagonal gauge,(a
ap)~=
8pf(q);2
it is easyto
show that the transverse part, q qp/q2, of the cor-relation function(a
ap)~ does not affect the transport propertiesof
electrons. In the case whena
random field in the 2D system is produced bya
thin film of amagnetic material sputtered on the semiconductor surfaceat
the distance d &om the 2D gas, the Huctuation ofa
gauge field isdescribed by the correlation function of the above form withf(q)
=
e 2'i"(p2). Whena
magnetic powder fills one half ofa
space,f(q)
=
qie
2'i"(p ) The cor-.relation function
f(q)
due toa
magnetic field frozen intoa
superconducting gate as a number of residual fIuxes corresponds tof(q)
=
q 2e 2'i(p2).
In the abovedefini-tions, (p2) is the quantity proportional
to
the rms valueof
distributed magnetic moments and could be referredto
asa
phenomenological parameter. Finally, abuilt-in magnetic disorder associated witha
sourceof
scattering inthe composite-fermion system can be described by the latter expression with d=
0.
After averaging over
a
magnetic disorder, the vertex1
&"'"(p)
=
=
2xvpI',
".
s—
E(p)6
zT /2Depending on the origin of
a
random magnetic field, this rate can strongly differ &om the momentum relaxation rate and, in some cases [whenf(q)
oc q],
it formally diverges. Nevertheless, this does not mean that the per-turbation theory is not applicableto
studiesof
the trans-port in this system. Even in the caseof
a
divergent 7the momentum relaxation rate,
7„=
27rvy (I'o(o)—
I'i
(o)),
is finite and the electron mean-&ee path l=
vI;7p can be long enoughto
providea
metallicity parameter pFt &)1.
In what follows, we operate with vertices I'p y as ifthey are finite and find that the quantity 7 cancels &om the transport coefficients, whereas only the convergent ~ remains, which approves this approach.
As we know &om the theories ofan ordinary potential scattering, there are two main constraints that play the dominant role in diagrammatic calculations ofsuch quan-tities as the conductivity, the localization corrections
to
it,
and the correlation functionof
mesoscopic conduc-tances. These are the renormalized disordered vertexI'
and the renormalized current vertexV,
both being the sums of the diagrams shown inFig.
1.
Incalculating the renormalized vortex
I'(p,
p';
p",
p"')
we should distinguish particle-hole and particle-particle channels. The two-particle Green's function in the particle-hole channel (diffusion) is relatedto
the diffu-sionof
density and isexpectedisto
possessa
pole in the regionof
small transferred momenta. That is why we calculate the function I'q(p,p', Q)
=
I'(p
+
Q/2, p'
+
Q/2;p
—
Q/2,p'
—
Q/2) assuniing that Q«
p,p'p~.
The two-electron Green's function in the particle-particle channel (Cooperon) is related to the diffusion of a co-herent particle phaseis and (in systems with the tirne-reversal syminetry) isformed by the phase space region of small summed momenta:I',
(p, p', Q)
=
I'(p
+
Q/2,p'+
Q/2;—
p
+
Q/2,—
p'+
Q/2).
Since the electron scatter-ing by a RMF is strongly anisotropic and in the most interesting cases isa
dominantly low angle, we use the trick often appliedto
kinetic equations in systems with an anisotropic scattering. We representI'~(,
) in the formof a
multipolar expansion series,appears as
a
construction unitof
the perturbation-theory diagrams [tv=
(ev~)2]. In the figures below, this is shown by dashed lines. Dueto
the isotropyof
the sys-tem, which is held in average, one should distinguish two nonrenormalized dashed" vortices,I'op'
=
dO'
I'"'(p,
p',
p, p'),
dOI'"'(p,
p' p p')
27)
pF
The first I'p(o) plays the role in determining the collision
Yx
Y~
'l
+ ~l&
FIG.
1.
Diagrammatic representation of vorticesV
andI'~(
)(&)
=
I'~()o(&)+
I 2 l
I'~(-)i(&)
(p p'i
)
+
l"',
"
"lH,
(.
).
(~)
)
P
P
d(c)—
and integrate both sides
of
the Dyson equation onI'
over the orientationof p
andp'
with the multipolar weights. After keeping leading terms, we find that in the particle-hole channel2
I„=I,
("+
~-~~~
—
("",
~~I„,
+~"",
„~
II&,
,
(2)
IId+ ——
i
2rdp(,
+I'dy, ~+
—
~
~+
(D
iIId+,
and
(0)
,
Id,
=I
+Tv
7I'
(0)I'„, II„=O.
From these equations, one can easily conclude that the diffusion modes I'dp and IId+ are gapless and contain a pole in the space ofvariables Qand ur, whereas the mode
I'q does not show any long wavelength contribution, and
I's
=
2I'ei IT( /(I'e
—
T().
This immediatelyelimi-nates
I'i
from the first two equations inEq.
(2)and leads usto
the diffusion equation on the vertex I'dp,I'go ——
, (
—
i(u—
DQ2)P
=
I,
(3)
P()
2'
Vy72where
D
=
v&~/[4+v~(l'o—
I'(i))]
=
v&~r„/2 is adiffusion coeKcient andAt this stage, we can already calculate the transport coefFicients of the system. In particular, the Einstein relation between the diffusion coeKcient
D
due to the electron scattering on aRMF
and the conductivity~.
IT
=
e v~D=
'z'& (p~l/h), can be easily reproduced, aswell as the value of the Hall coefficient (s is the spin degeneracy of the Fermi surface). From the suppres-sion ofthe Cooperon channel, one can see that the first logarithmic quantum corrections
to
the conductivity2
[2'&In(Ly/l)] isabsent. After some algebra, one can find
that the logarithmic localization correction can appear only in the next order with respect to theinverse metallic-ity parameter 1/pr l as
ho~,
=
N;2 &—
& . Thisstate-ln(L/t)
ment repeats earlier predictions and manifests that the system has the localization properties of a unitary ran-dom scattering ensemble studied in general localization theories. The exact value of
a
coeKcient v can be de-rived much more elegantly after reducing the problem to the nonlinear supersymmetric o model.As we mentioned above, the suppression of localiza-tion corrections to conductivity does not mean that the electron transport in systems with RMF scattering nec-essarily loses all its quantum features. Just as in disor-dered conductors inastrong magnetic field, the sample-specific interference pattern formed by diffusive electron waves is still present if the temperature is low enough to prevent phase-breaking processes. Therefore, the 2D electron gas subjected to a random magnetic field has to show the conductance Huctuations, similarly to the electrons in disordered conductors. Within the frame of
a
perturbation theory, mesoscopic conductance Huctua-tions are described by the mean square ofthe deviation of a sample-specific conductance from the averaged value,(bG2). The set ofdiagrams that represent this quantity (see
Fig.
2) has been derived in earlier works. Skip-ping the details, the magnitude of the effect is controlled by the gapless diffusive mode, and thus. the ladder partI
F
'
I &—,
IF("(P P)
2'
(
J2~)
is the momentum relaxation
rate.
Naturally, for systems with
a
broken time-reversal symmetry, the vortexI'
in the particle-particle channel does not show any singular contribution:t
/gp
'x'
jr)
gQ'x'
QpI l I I
I
—+
I I
I
l
—
+
t
This manifests in the fact that the coherence between two time-reversed trajectories is destroyed
at
the time scale ofa
scattering time v. and that, in average, the electronbehavior is more close
to
thatof
a classical particle, as has been discussed in Ref.1.
The renormalization of a current vortex
V(p)
=
U~,
PF can bederived &omits relation to the already calculated term I'qi, U=
vF(1+
Trv~rt'~i). After substituting the result of Eqs. (2) we arrive at(o)
I
0 V~~P~I
(0)I(0)
0 1
50 CONDUCTANCE FLUCTUATIONS IN SYSTEMS WITH RANDOM-.
. .
17409of
these graphs is dominated by the renormalized vertex I'ge(Q) given byEq.
(2).
The collision time 7 (which pri-marily entered into the expressions for I'p0 and the cur-rent vortexV)
cancels, and the rms valueof
conductance Buctuations ina RMF
expressed in terms ofa
difFusive modeP(Q),
2
takes exactly the same form as in
a
usual disordered conductor subjectedto
a
strong magnetic field, indepen-dentlyof
the specific form and originof
the disordered static vector potentiala.
The calculation of (6G~) needs the difFusion equation in
(3) to
be completed with the boundary conditions. Tobe consistent, the latter should be zeroat
hard walls(r
= r,
),
VP(r,
)=
0, and the loss ofa
coherent phase memory in bulk electrodes(r
=
r~)
givesP(rl,
)=
0.
24 To bespecific, we distinguisha
long (quasi-1D) wire and find(bG
)=
—
~s
/ez)
15
(h
which also would describe the amplitudes
of
aperiodic conductance oscillations under variations ofan additional external homogeneous magnetic field.In microstructures prepared from extremely pure 2D electron gas subjected
to a
combinationof a
random(a)
anda
homogeneous(H)
magnetic field,Eq.
(6)confirmsa
preliminary expectation that the transport in this sys-tem should show all the featuresof
a
typical representa-tive ofa
unitary random scattering ensemble (the spin-degeneracy factor 8 can be equalto
2 or 4, depending on the Zeeman splitting efficiency). On the other hand, the correlation propertiesof
magnetoconductance Buctu-ations in eachof
possible candidates for sucha
system would be difFerent. In mostof
them, any variationof
an external magnetic field brings,at
the first instance,a
variationof
a
random magnetic field,too.
As appliedto
theRMF
created bya
layerof
powdered ferromag-netic particles on the surfaceof a
semiconductor, this would come through their polarization. Whena
RMF is created by anumberof
Bux tubes penetrated througha
superconducting screen put overa
mesoscopic bridge, the efFectof
a homogeneous external field depends on the featuresof
the superconducting material. Therefore,if
theRMF
is created using external means, the corre-lations in magnetoconductance Buctuations are strongly affected by propertiesof
these "external means,"
which makesit
difficultto
estimate the correlation field in ad-vance. Only when the sourceof a
magnetic-field random-ness lies ina
roughness ora
curvatureof
the 2Delectron channel imposed on the parallel orstrongly inclined mag-netic Geld, ' can the correlation Geld be estimated &omthe direct change
of
a
mean squareof
a
Bux penetrated into the sample area:S(H2)i~2
40.
III.
CONDUCTANCE
PLUCTUATIONS
INCOMPOSITE-FERMION
LIQUIDS
AT v=—
To apply the results
of
the above calculationsto
the quant»m transport propertiesof
micrometer-size wires with the composite-fermion liquid (the 2D electron gas near the even-denominator filling factors) one should take into account the two following remarks.First,
accordingto
Refs. 14and 15, the transport due tocomposite quasi-particles is described by their (dissipative) conductivity 0 which is directly relatedto
observable resistivity p as 0=
1/p,
but not by usual inverse-tensor relations. The presenceof a
Hall term p„
isskipped, since the lat-ter isconsidered asa
quantity relatedto
the mean gauge field. Hence, once we discuss the fiuctuationof a
con-ductance Gdue tocomposite quasiparticles, it has to be imagined asa
fiuctuationof
the inverse resistanceR
measured in the four-terminal geometry. Therefore, an estimation in
Eq.
(6) gives only an order ofmagnitudeof
6G=
6(R
i)
and should be corrected by geometrical factors specificto
the multilead devices.~Second, an application
of Eq.
(6)to
thequant»m trans-port in the composite-fermion system interferes with the unusual correspondence between the Aharonov-Bohm and Aharonov-Casher efFects in itand brings usto
a
con-clusion that can beusedto
demonstrate the multiple Bux built up into the composite quasiparticle. Indeed, based on the ass~~mption ' that the electron system near thefilling factor v
=
2 is equivalentto
the Fermi gas of composite quasiparticles that live in an effective mag-netic fieldH,
s
=
H
—
Hiyz, we can conclude that the magnetoconductance Buctuations ina
microbridge can be equally affected both by the variation ofa
magnetic-field Buxthrough its area orby the changeof
the electron sheet density.Conductance fiuctuations around v
=
1/2 undera
di-rect variationof
a
magnetic field itself have already been observed bySi~~ons
et al.,zi though the regionof
in-terest for the present paper has not been analyzed in detail. On the other hand, the effective magnetic Bux through the sample can be varied indirectly, if it is true that each composite quasiparticle 3 ' incorporates
two Bux quanta attached
to
a
single chargee.
Therefore, the changeof
a total
effective Bux4,
g—
—
SH,
g encircled bya
pairof
characteristic difFusive trajectories that cor-respondsto
an additional quant»~40
can be converted intoa
density variation, that provides an implantation of an additional charge6q
~
2 into the contact areaS.
The resulting variationsof
the conductance versus the gate voltage should look like aperiodic Coulomb oscilla-tions, but this isexpected in the system that is open and is definitely beyond the Coulomb-blockade regime.compos-ite fermions. The above proposed experiment would be complementary
to
the measurementsof
an efFective Bux quantum in the &actional quantum Hall efFects discussed before.26Its
realization requires the temperatureT
to
be below the Thouless energyE,
mhD/2I, 2 for the com-posite quasiparticles. The latter would belower than the Thouless energy for real electrons in the same structure at low fields, but the reported valuesisis of
composite-fermion mean-free paths are long enoughto
expect pro-nounced features in pm-size samplesat
T
0.
1K.
tering on
a
static random magnetic Geld shows that this system possesses all the typical featuresof a
unitary ran-dom scattering ensemble. On the other hand, an applica-tionof
the obtained resultto
the electron liquid around v=
I/2q and the unusual correspondence between the Aharonov-Bohm and Aharonov-Casher effects specific to the composite fermions showsa
possibilityof
testingdi-rectly the multiple Aux structure
of
composite quasipar-ticles.ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
IV.
CONCLUSIONS
The above-presented perturbation-theory analysis of conductance Huctuations in systems with electron
scat-The author thanks
J.
Chalker,K.
Efetov,S.
Feng,K.
v. Klitzing,I.
Levy, andD.
Weiss for discussions and H. Stormer for useful information. Partial support fromISF
Grant No.REE-000
is also acknowledged.B.
L.Altshuler and L.B.
Ioffe, Phys. Rev. Lett. B9, 2979 (1992).J.
M. Wheatley andT.
M. Hong, Phys. Rev.B 43,
6288(1991);
D.Khveschenko andS.
V.Meshkov, ibid. 4T, 12051(1993).
T.
Sugiyama and N. Nagaosa, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1980 (1993);Y.
Avishai et aL, Phys. Rev.B
4'F, 9561(1993); P.A.Lee and D.S.
Fisher, Phys. Rev. Lett. 4T,882(1981).
V. Kalmeyer et al., Phys. Rev.B 48,
11095 (1993);V.Kalmeyer and S.C.Zhang, ibid. 46,9889 (1992).
D.
K.K.
Lee andJ.
T.
Chalker, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 1510 (1994).A.Aronov et al.,Phys. Rev.
B 49,
16609(1994).S.
J.
Bending,K.
v.Klitzing, and K.Ploog, Phys. Rev.Lett. B5,1060(1990); S.J.
Bending et al.,Phys. Rev.B
42,9859 (1990); G.H. Kruithof et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. B7, 2725(1991).
A.K. Geim et OL, Pis'ma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.
51,
107 (1990)[JETP
Lett.51,
121(1990)];Phys. Rev. Lett.69,
2252 (1992).A.K.Geim et al.,Solid State Commun.
82,
831(1992).R.Yagi and
Y.
Iye,J.
Phys. Soc. Jpn. 62, 1279(1993); D.Weiss (private communication).
V.
I.
Fal'ko,J.
Phys. Condens. Matter 2,3797(1990).
I.
V.Kukushkin (private communication).J.
K.
Jain, Phys. Rev. Lett.63,
199(1989).
B.
I.
Halperin, P.A. Lee, and N. Read, Phys. Rev.B
47, 7312(1993).
R.R.
Du et aL, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 2944 (1993); D.R.
Leadley et aL, ibid. 72, 1906(1994).P.A. Lee and
T.
V. Ramakrishnan, Rev. Mod. Phys.57,
287 (1985).C.P. Umbach et al, Phys..Rev.
B 30,
4048 (1984);J.
C.Licini et al,Phys. R. ev. Lett. 55, 2987(1985).
B.
L.Altshuler, Pis'ma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.41,
530(1985)[JETP
Lett.41,
648 (1985)]; P.A. Lee and A.D. Stone, Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 1622 (1985); A.D. Stone, ibid. 54,2692(1985);
B.
L.Altshuler and D.E.
Khmel'nitskii, Pis'ma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 42, 291 (1985)[JETP
Lett. 42, 359 (1985)].R.L. Willet et aL, Phys. Rev. Lett. 'Fl, 3846 (1993);W. Kang et al, ibid.
71,
.3850 (1993);V.J.
Goldman et al., ibid. 'F2, 2065 (1994).J.
W.C.Beenakker andB.
Rejaei, Phys. Rev.Lett.71,
3689 (1993);J.
Chalker and A. Macedo, ibid. T1,3693(1993).
J.
A.Simmons et al.,Phys. Rev.B
44, 12933(1991).
K.
B.
Efetov, Adv. Phys.32,
51(1983).
A.
I.
Larkin and D.E.
Khmel'nitskii, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.91,
1815(1986)[Sov.Phys.JETP
B4, 1075 (1986)]; P.A. Lee et al., Phys. Rev.B 35,
1039 (1987); V.I.
Fal'ko andD.
E.
Khmel'nitskii, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.95,
328 (1989) [Sov. Phys.JETP 68,
186(1989)].
It is possible that the formulation ofboundary conditions
to the diffusion ofcomposite fermions should be extended to some more general form,
VP(r,
)—
P(r,
)/A=
0.This accounts for a possible decay of a composite quasiparti-cle in those regions ofa sample where the electron density drops and the structure ofelementary excitations drasti-cally changes, which would reduce the amplitude of Suctu-atlons.C.