Town of Nags Head Planning Board Minutes June Town of Nags Head Planning Board June 16, 2015

Town of Nags Head Planning Board

June 16, 2015

The Planning Board of the Town of Nags Head met in regular session on Tuesday, June 16, 2015 in the Board Room at the Nags Head Municipal Complex.

Chairman Mark Cornwell called the meeting to order at 2:30 p.m. as a quorum was present.

Members Present

Mark Cornwell, Barbara Gernat, Ben Reilly, Clyde Futrell, Kate Murray, Jim Troutman, Pogie Worsley

Members Absent

None

Others Present

Andy Garman, Kelly Wyatt, Holly White, Lily Nieberding

Approval of Agenda

There being no changes, Clyde Futrell moved to approve the agenda as presented. Jim Troutman seconded the motion and it passed by unanimous vote.

Audience Response

There being no comments, Chairman Cornwell closed the Public Comment/Audience Response.

Approval of Minutes

There being no changes, Ben Reilly moved that the minutes be approved as presented; Kate Murray seconded the motion and the motion passed by unanimous vote.

Report of Board of Commissioners Actions

Deputy Planning Director Kelly Wyatt reported on recent Board Actions:

There was a Second Reading/Public Hearing to re-establish “Airboat Rental Passenger Operation” as a Conditional Use within the Commercial-Outdoor Recreation Overlay District. The zoning ordinance text amendment was adopted by 4-1 vote. Immediately following that there was a Public Hearing to consider a CUP/Site Plan Amendment submitted by James Moore of Outer Banks Adventures, to operate airboat tours and stand-up paddle board rentals at the property located at 7649 S. Virginia Dare Trail. The CUP/Site Plan was approved as presented.

There was a Public Hearing to consider a preliminary subdivision plat with subdivision variance/waiver request submitted by Shirley Weeks for the creation of a two-lot subdivision located at 109 E. Mall

Drive. After much discussion the Board decided to table the item until the September 2015 Commissioners meeting.

There was also a Public Hearing to consider amendments to the Town’s Stormwater Ordinance as it pertains to limitations on fill material and the relationship to the Town’s one-foot freeboard

requirement. These amendments were adopted; additionally the Board requested that Staff and the Planning Board consider “ring-wall” style construction. Ms. Wyatt noted that this would be discussed later on under Discussion Items in the agenda.

Finally there was a Public Hearing to consider a zoning ordinance text amendment prohibiting the removal/clearing of trees on vacant lots prior to site plan approval/building permit issuance for new construction. This amendment was adopted with language allowing for the removal of dead, diseased trees and trees posing imminent danger to persons or property.

Lastly, Ms. Wyatt noted that there will be a Drone Workshop held on June 17th, 2015. The workshop was originally advertised for 7:00 PM but will actually begin at 6:00 pm.

Town Updates

Action Items

Consideration of a Conditional Use/Site Plan Amendment application submitted by Quible & Associates on behalf of Verdad Real Estate and 7-Eleven, for proposed site redevelopment consisting of

retail/convenience store with fueling dispensers and canopy. The property is located at 3643 S.

Croatan Highway, Nags Head and is zoned C-2, General Commercial

Ms. Wyatt presented a Conditional Use/Site Plan Amendment submitted by Quible & Associates, P.C.

on behalf of Verdad Real Estate and 7-Eleven to redevelop the site located at 3643 S. Croatan Highway (formerly Jockeys Ridge Shell Station and repair garage) and construct a 3,085 square foot retail building with fuel dispensing stations and canopy. The property is currently zoned C-2, General Commercial District.

Staff has reviewed this request against two separate use categories. Within the C-2, the zoning code permits, via conditional use approval, “Automobile Service Station and Repair Garage”. Since the service station/repair garage is being eliminated, the use will be regulated as retail with gasoline service. Although retail is a permitted use, Staff has requested that the gasoline portion of the development meet the requirements of Town Code Section 48-407 (c)(1) which applies to automobile service stations and repair garages. In particular, this ordinance requires that gasoline pumps (in this case the fuel dispenser) be located at least 50 feet from all property lines. Based upon their review Staff has determined that the proposal is compliant with these use standards, however, due to the uniqueness of re-developing a non-conforming site there are some non-conformities.

The site is currently non-conforming with respect to lot coverage and stormwater management and has four driveway access points (two on US 158 and two on NC 12) which do not meet Town requirements. The Town’s ordinance allows the applicant to redevelop and maintain a nonconforming status as long as the degree of nonconformity is not increased. The applicant has met with Staff on several occasions to discuss the project and has been told that lot coverage does not have to be brought into compliance with the current ordinance as long as the existing paved surface is reused

and lot coverage is not increased. Additionally, if the applicant does not fill or increase lot coverage, the current stormwater regulations would not be applicable to the development.

In discussions with the applicant, staff has indicated that, although a nonconforming status does exist, efforts should be made to reduce nonconformities to the extent possible and provide some level of stormwater management.

Ms. Wyatt noted that allowable lot coverage for this site is 55% however it may be increased to no more than 65% if open-face paving block, TurfstoneTM, or porous concrete as approved by the town engineer, is used in place of surfaces such as concrete or asphalt. Existing lot coverage totals 79.1%

of the lot area, thus creating a nonconforming site conditions. The proposed re-development of this site would reduce the existing lot coverage to 72.3% of the total lot area. Based upon a reduction in overall lot coverage, staff submits that the nonconformity has not been increased and is compliant.

The maximum allowable height within the Town is 35 ft. however total height may be increased to 42 ft. with the use of an 8:12 roof pitch or greater. The proposed height of the retail/convenience structure is approximately 30 ft. therefore height is compliant.

A total of 125 architectural design points as required by Section 48-371 of the Town Code is necessary for the proposed structure. A total of 128 design points have been proposed through the use of a first floor porch, numerous bump outs, a pitched roof, simulated wood shingles and various other architectural elements therefore architecture is compliant.

Required parking for this project is being provided in compliance with the Retail standard of one parking space for each 250 square feet of gross floor area, plus one parking space for each employee, but no less than two spaces for each retail unit or establishment. A total of 16 parking spaces are required; 20 parking spaces have been provided therefore parking is compliant.

Town Code Section 48-163(12) requires that at minimum a buffer strip of at least five feet in width shall be provided between the parking lot and the street right-of-way line in accordance with section 48-482(3) buffer yard C. Additionally, Town Code Section 48-371(g), Open Space preservation/landscaping requirements requires that 10% of the lot’s total area be preserved or 15%

of the lot’s total area to be planted in new vegetation. These requirements shall be applied separately of any required buffer yard with the exception that preserved natural vegetation may be applied towards buffering and preservation/landscaping. A compliant 5 ft. wide buffer yard C has been provided between parking areas and street rights-of way.

There is no existing vegetation to be preserved on this site; therefore 5,222 square feet of the site must be planted. The developer is providing 5,442 square feet of planted area so the requirements of Town Code Section 48-371(g) have been met. Staff would further note that, while not required to do so by ordinance, the majority of the plantings are shown along the northern property boundary to separate and buffer the commercial use from the adjoining residential uses.

Ms. Wyatt noted that although a lighting plan was submitted, there was insufficient information on lighting to determine full compliance. A revised lighting plan was submitted and is currently being reviewed by Code Compliance Officer Kim Allen; approval shall be obtained prior to proceeding to the Board of Commissioners.

Ms. Wyatt also stated that proposed signage has not yet been submitted however any freestanding and wall signage shall be reviewed and approved prior to issuance of zoning and building permits.

With regards to water and sewage disposal Ms. Wyatt noted the applicant has obtained an improvement permit from the Dare County Health Department and passed around a copy to the Planning Board members for their review. The applicant is proposing to replace the existing wastewater system, which is partially in the Conch Street right-of-way, with a compliant on-site system.

Comments from the Town Engineer concerning Stormwater Management and Traffic Circulation were provided in a memorandum dated June 11, 2015. Ms. Wyatt noted that it is in these two areas where Staff found the most non conformities when it comes to redevelopment of a site. Ms. Wyatt stated that Town Engineer David Ryan was present and could speak in more detail about his comments.

Ms. Wyatt noted that the plan has been reviewed by the Fire Department; the project will be required to comply with all applicable NC Fire Prevention Code requirements as part of building permit application review and issuance.

Town Engineer David Ryan addressed the Board. Mr. Ryan reviewed what currently exists at the site and what is being proposed. Mr. Ryan noted that the only stormwater measure currently provided is a swale partially located in the right-of-way of Conch Street and reduction of the two driveway aprons along US 158 and NC 12. In lieu of providing a complete stormwater management plan for the site, it is recommended that the applicant provide permeable pavement around the periphery of the site to aid in onsite stormwater management. Additionally, to prevent runoff onto NC 12, it is recommended that the concrete valley gutter proposed at the S. Virginia Dare Trail driveway apron be revised so that it is offset 6 ft. from the edge of pavement with a 2-inch vertical fall draining back into the site.

As far as traffic circulation, it is recommended that the applicant provide siting of the loading zone in such a way that it does not impede the free movement of pedestrians and vehicles or conflict with the proposed “fire lane”. Staff is also recommending that they provide vehicular pathing for sanitation vehicles as well as adequate siting of front-loading dumpster access. Mr. Ryan explained that while the site can accommodate side loading dumpsters the Town is looking at going to front-loading dumpster vehicles in the future.

Staff is also recommending that modifications be made to the US 158 driveway to provide increased separation from the intersection with Conch Street and that justification be provided for maintain non- conformity for S. Virginia Dare Trail entrance. Additionally, to eliminate turning movement conflicts, it is recommended that the US 158 driveway be a right-out only configuration and that a “pork chop”

style raised concrete barrier be provided to enforce the required turning movement.

Mr. Ryan confirmed for Ms. Murray that the Hollowell beach access just north of the site was the closest pedestrian crosswalk. Ms. Murray stated that they will probably see an increase of pedestrian traffic due to the development of the site.

Michael Strader, an engineer with Quible & Associates spoke in front of the Board and addressed some of Staff’s concerns. With regards to the loading zone conflicting with the “fire lane”, Mr. Strader believes there is enough room for traffic circulation that it should not be a problem. Mr. Strader also stated the Fire Department had reviewed the site plan and did not have any concerns.

With regards to stormwater management, they are proposing to remove some coverage and re-grade it to promote stormwater infiltration, as well as remove two of the four existing access points. Mr.

Strader stated that they were agreeable in implementing Mr. Ryan’s suggestions related to the proposed flow gutter.

Mr. Strader stated due to the initial construction cost as well as the on-going maintenance costs associated with permeable pavements, the Developer had not intended to install permeable pavement but would be willing to place Turfstone pavers on the eastern most proposed parking spots if the Board recommends it.

With regards to the front loading dumpster, Mr. Strader that the dumpster pad was fully maneuverable and that they had left enough area on the north end of the drive aisle so that they can add front loader dumpster pad if and when the time comes.

As far as the non-conformity of the driveways, Mr. Strader noted that the access point on South Croatan Highway can be readily modified and would be agreeable to eliminating the non-conformity.

Mr. Strader also noted that it would be difficult to modify the access point on Virginia Dare Trail but they would be willing to look at that further if the Board feels strongly about it.

Mr. Strader confirmed that he was confident that they would have an NCDOT Encroachment Agreement prior to the Board of Commissioners meeting.

Mr. Strader stated that the developer would prefer not to install pork chops as recommended by Staff and did not recommend but it was open for discussion depending on Board preference.

Mr. Ryan confirmed for Mr. Worsley that the Board has not yet approved the front loaded dumpsters and it is something that is still in discussion; there is currently no timeline for the transition.

Mr. Strader confirmed for Mr. Troutman that the existing fire hydrant will not interfere with drainage and that they have been able to work around and protect it.

Mr. Strader confirmed for Mr. Futrell that the site could not be flipped and is pretty locked down based on the necessary fueling dispenser setbacks. The only way the fueling dispensers could be set and configured on the site is the way it is shown on the site plan.

Mr. Futrell stated that he agreed with Mr. Strader in that he did not agree with the addition of the pork chops. He gave the pork chops used at the entrance to the Kill Devil Hills Harris Teeter as an example to show how confusing their placement can be and the difficulty they could cause to a large truck.

Mr. Strader confirmed for Ms. Gernat that the fueling truck would access the tanks from the south side of the canopy so any customers could fuel up by accessing the pumps from the north side of the canopy.

Ms. Murray expressed concern with stormwater runoff going into the Conch Street ocean outfalls and encouraged the applicant to try and mitigate that as much as they can. The proposed swales will prevent some runoff but consider using permeable pavers as well.

Mr. Worsley expressed concern about the six southern proposed parking spots being used as overflow parking for the beach access and stated that area might be better used for stormwater management instead of parking. Mr. Worsley also stated that there is always a safety concern when using

Turfstone. Mr. Worsley also agreed with Mr. Futrell stating that using pork chops was a terrible idea for the site.

Mr. Strader confirmed for Chairman Cornwell that they were not opposed to adding the pork chop depending on Board preference but would prefer the plan to go forward without them.

Mr. Ryan confirmed that the Town does not have a set standard when it comes to pork chops and could work with the applicant regarding the size of the pork chop; Mr. Ryan also presented a pathing plan that demonstrated how a large truck could access the site without driving over the pork chop.

Mr. Ryan also stated that they have found with the new ABC store site that a ground painted pork chop does not work as well in deterring drivers from going left.

Planning Director Andy Garman confirmed that the pork chop that is being suggested for this site is different than the one that was put in Harris Teeter.

Mr. Reilly stated he would like to have seen a site plan with accesses from Conch Street instead of the bypass and the beach road as this would help with both traffic circulation and stormwater

management.

Ms. Gernat and Mr. Cornwell both agreed that the pork chop was a necessary addition to the site plan. A vote was taken and the Board agreed 4 to 2 to add the pork chop to the site with Clyde Futrell and Pogie Worsley casting the Nay vote.

After some discussion the Board also agreed that they would like to see permeable pavement for the six southern parking spots.

Chairman Cornwell suggested that they table the item until the next meeting to give the applicant time to make the recommended changes while still allowing them to go to consent agenda in July.

This would still give them the ability to have the Public Hearing in August.

Mr. Garman confirmed with the Board that their recommendations were to 1) add the pork chops, 2) reduce the width of the entrance from South Croatan Highway and increase the distance from the Conch Street right-of-way 3) replace the asphalt with permeable pavement on the southern parking spaces 10-16. The Board agreed and Ben Reilly moved to table with Barbara Gernat seconding the motion; the motion passed unanimously.

Chairman Cornwell suggested that, due to the number of people that were waiting to speak related to rental signs, the Action item be moved up in the agenda and discussed prior to cottage courts.

Consideration of zoning ordinance text amendments related to residential rental signs being posted along the roadway when the rental home is greater than 100 ft. from the roadway.

Deputy Town Manager/Planning Director Andy Garman explained that at its May meeting, the Planning Board discussed options to regulate freestanding rental signs at single-family vacation rental properties.

As background, the Town has an ordinance that allows a single-family dwelling to have a “for rent”

sign attached to the structure for the purpose of identifying the rental house number and the contact information for the property management company. The signs may be up to six square feet in area.

In cases where structures are located more than 100 feet from the street right-of-way, the ordinance allows a freestanding rental sign to be placed in the yard. There is no minimum height for these signs and no required setback. This allowance has been provided to increase the visibility of rental signs where they would be difficult to see from the road.

At a previous Board of Commissioner meeting there was concern expressed about the increase in number and proliferation of the signs around Town. Concerned that it might become a significant problem in the future, the Commissioners asked Staff and the Planning Board to look into the issue.

Staff did an analysis and presented the Planning Board with detailed information on the current number of these signs within the Town as well as the potential for additional signs based on lots that would qualify based on their configuration and use. Staff also presented a summary of public comments regarding these signs. Based on this information, Staff recommended several options to modify regulations for freestanding rental signs.

Mr. Garman stated that at their May meeting, the Planning Board voted to recommend an ordinance which would include the following provisions pertaining to freestanding rental signs:

• They would only be allowed if the dwelling is located 100 feet or more from the right-of-way.

• The size would be limited to 1.5 square feet in area and the height would be limited to two feet.

• Signs should consist of no more than one post and no visible frame.

• A compliance deadline would be established.

• Dwellings located more than 100 feet from the right-of-way could also have a six square foot sign attached to the wall of the dwelling.

Mr. Garman further stated that since that time, the Planning Board chair had suggested two additional provisions that he would like the Planning Board to consider:

• Signs should be placed parallel to the roadway

• That siting criteria be established considering the driveway location, setbacks, and right of way.

Mr. Garman stated that Staff had drafted an ordinance based on the recommendations and would be happy to answer any questions for the Board.

After a brief discussion related to the use of one post vs. two, the Board asked to hear from the public.

First, Mr. Webb Fuller spoke on behalf of Carolina Design Realty. Mr. Fuller read a note from Monica Thibodeau (Sp?) stating that the signs are beneficial to ID and locate a property; all signs have been kept in good repair and have been recently replaced at considerable expense – the proposed

ordinance would add to that expense. Mr. Fuller also stated that the current ordinance has been in place for almost 30 years or longer and the company has worked hard to comply with the regulations.

They would respectfully request that the Planning Board keep the existing ordinance in place.

Next Mr. Bob Oakes addressed the Board. Mr. Oakes lives in Nags Head and represents Village Realty.

Mr. Oakes stated that he shares common causes with the Town; vacation rentals provide about two million dollars to the Town through the occupancy tax. People come to Nags Head because it is a pretty place and he wants to keep the Town aesthetically pleasing. This sign issue is a very important issue for vacation rental companies. Mr. Oakes suggested that the Board sit with the stakeholders before making a recommendation to the Commissioners. The signs are necessary for locating the houses; it’s hard to see a sign from 100 feet away. They do give their guests the address and maps

is also a security aspect because they don’t put the address of the house on the key in case the key gets lost. Mr. Oakes also acknowledged that there is an element of advertising to the signs in that it helps identify houses in their rental program. If the Board does change the ordinance Mr. Oakes would ask for an incremental approach, one year is not a feasible timeframe. Mr. Oakes suggested doing some voluntary things, maybe starting with the height of the signs which could be easily

rectified. Mr. Oakes noted that changing the signs would be a large expense, both materials and labor and reiterated his suggestion that the Board sit down and discuss the issue further with the

stakeholders.

Mr. Oakes confirmed for Ms. Gernat that some of their signs are regulated due to the Village restricted covenants.

Dan Hardy with Joe Lamb Realty was next to address the Board. Mr. Hardy stated that they use the signs for advertising houses and to help their guests find the houses. The input they have received from their customers has been very positive. The current sign ordinance has been in place at least since 1987 and Mr. Hardy is not sure what the impetus is behind the change. He acknowledged that there have been more signs but also noted that there are other non-conforming signs around the Town and stated that if the Board is going to look at one type of sign they should look at all signs.

They spent a substantial amount of money on their new signs, they went with a very robust structure so that they wouldn’t blow away and they were expensive. If the Town were to make a change he would ask that they give a reasonable amount of time for compliance. They expect their signs to have a 3 to 5 year lifespan. Mr. Hardy noted that the Town is known for being aesthetically pleasing and he would like the opportunity to sit down and discuss the issue and come up with ideas that work with everyone. They would not like to see the new ordinance move forward and definitely does not agree with having the signs parallel to the road.

Mr. Hardy confirmed for Mr. Cornwell that the cost for sign was about $100, materials and labor. Mr.

Hardy also confirmed that they have 77 signs in Nags Head.

Dorie Fuller with Village Realty addressed the Board. Village Realty and other rental companies have developed signs in compliance with the Town ordinances and they have spent a lot of money

producing and installing them. Now there is a proposal to change the signs. A change of this

magnitude should include discussions with representatives from the industry. They have not seen any data or reasons for this proposed change. The current signs have aided their guests in safely locating their house and the industry deserves the chance to sit down and discuss the reasons for the

proposed change.

Ben Reilly stated that this was brought to the Planning Board’s attention by the Commissioners after receiving complaints about the aesthetics of the signs. Mr. Reilly asked if any of those present had any suggestions as to what can be done.

Mr. Fuller stated that he felt one industry has been singled out; there are other signs that are not in compliance. Real estate signs are in compliance with the ordinance.

Mr. Oakes suggested an incremental approach; maybe consider lowering height. Lowering the profile of the signs might improve the aesthetics.

Mr. Futrell stated that there had been some good points brought up; he would like the Board to take a step back and maybe do a workshop with stakeholders after the end of the season.

Mr. Worsley stated that it looked like companies had revamped the signs recently; that is probably what has brought them to forefront. Mr. Worsley agreed with tabling the issue and meeting with stakeholders.

Mr. Fuller reiterated that Stakeholders need to better understand the issue and that if the Town is going to look at the rental company signs they need to look at other sign issues as well.

Mr. Garman agreed that there are other issues related to signs in general and there have been some recommendations about signs that will be coming out as action items from the Small Business Committee, including tightening of some sign regulations. These regulations will also be looked at as part of the ordinance revision. Mr. Garman reiterated that the Town has been receiving complaints and Staff and the Planning Board were asked to look into the issue.

After some further discussion, Clyde Futrell moved to table the issue until after a workshop has taken place with the stakeholders in October. Staff was requested to clearly define the issues ahead of the workshop. Pogie Worsley seconded the motion, and the motion passed unanimously.

Consideration of zoning ordinance text amendments to Town Code Section 48-128, related to regulating minor additions/expansions to cottage courts.

Kelly Wyatt explained that the Planning Board discussed the issue of nonconforming cottage courts at its January, 2015 regular meeting. This issue was referred by the Board of Adjustment due to a variance case regarding the placement of a storage shed at an existing cottage court property. Since cottage courts are considered nonconforming by the ordinance, no expansions to these properties have been allowed except for general maintenance and repairs. While a variance for the shed was approved, the Board of Adjustment suggested that this type of improvement should be allowed by the ordinance. The Board of Adjustment asked the Planning Board and Board of Commissioners to review these rules and clarify the Town’s position on the maintenance and expansion of cottage courts.

Over the course several months, Staff then worked with the Planning Board to create a comprehensive list of cottage courts within the Town, to solicit feedback from cottage court owners about desired upgrades, and to formulate a revised ordinance that would essentially allow minor modifications such as detached storage sheds, on grade patios, decks, driveway additions where there is no increase in habitable area to be reviewed and approved administratively and to allow major modifications, where there would be an increase in habitable area, such as enclosing a porch to be considered for approval via the Conditional Use Permit process. With the draft language, under no circumstance could the existing degree of site or structural nonconformity, whether the proposed work is minor or major, be increased.

Barbara Gernat moved to recommend approval of the proposed zoning ordinance as presented. Jim Troutman seconded the motion and it passed unanimously.

Discussion Items

Discussion of “ring wall” style construction as it relates to the Town’s Stormwater Ordinance and retaining structural fill.

Andy Garman explained that at the last Board of Commissioner’s meeting during discussion of the revisions to the stormwater ordinance, when they were discussing the use of a turndown slab, the

style of construction be added as another option. Mr. Garman explained that “ring wall” uses a cinder block wall that would be a foot above BFE that you would then backfill and then pour a slab in

between. It’s just two ways to do something very similar and it would allow some more flexibility.

Mr. Worsley confirmed that a “ring wall” uses block to form a signet form which is then backfilled.

Mr. Cornwell was if favor if it gives builders another option and adds flexibility.

Mr. Garman confirmed for Mr. Reilly that there were no disadvantages as far as he could tell.

Chairman Cornwell asked that Staff bring back an amended proposed ordinance with a better definition of the “ring wall” style of construction.

Discussion of submittal packet and hard copies provided for large/substantial site plan proposals.

Chairman Cornwell asked that Staff add this item to the agenda. The Board currently receives digital copies of the Board Packet and proposed site plans and Mr. Cornwell asked if they are interested in receiving paper copies. After a brief discussion it was decided that if the Board members want paper copies they can request them from Ms. Wyatt as she will have some available. The Board will

continue to receive digital versions and Ms. Wyatt will only provide paper copies upon request.

Planning Board Members’ Agenda

Ms. Gernat stated that there are a lot of dumpsters in the Village at Nags Head in some very narrow streets. Ms. Gernat expressed concern about the possibility of the front loading dumpsters and their ability to service the narrow streets. Mr. Garman stated that the Town has just recently started

looking into them. They will probably start with the commercial establishments. The Town is getting a new side loader truck however they are becoming less practical, manufacturers are not making as many, and it is getting harder to find parts for them and to repair them. There will need to be more discussions about the residential implications.

Planning Board Chairman’s Agenda

Chairman Cornwell asked for an update on the Town Hall recycling bin. Ms. Gernat noted that she had spoken with Public Works Director Ralph Barile who is looking into some options.

Mr. Garman updated the Board regarding the traffic light at Carolista, stating that he had spoken about it with DOT. Chairman Cornwell directed Mr. Garman to ask DOT to look into the traffic light issue at the Post office.

Mr. Garman gave a brief update on the Town-wide recycling program.

Adjournment

There being no further business to discuss, a motion to adjourn was made by Barbara Gernat. Pogie Worsley seconded the motion and the motion passed unanimously. The time was 4:47 PM.

Respectfully submitted, Lily Campos Nieberding