• No results found

Fault Level Calculation_Methods

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Fault Level Calculation_Methods"

Copied!
46
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)
(2)

FAULT LEVEL AT ANY GIVEN

POINT OF THE ELECTRIC POWER

SUPPLY

NETWORK

IS

THE

MAXIMUM

CURRENT

THAT

WOULD FLOW IN CASE OF A

SHORT CIRCUIT FAULT AT THAT

POINT.

(3)

PURPOSE OF FAULT LEVEL

CALCULATIONS

FOR SELECTING SHORT CIRCUIT PROTECTIVE

DEVICES OF ADEQUATE SHORT CIRCUIT BREAKING CAPACITY.

FOR SELECTING CIRCUIT BREAKERS & SWITCHES

OF ADEQUATE SHORT CIRCUIT MAKING CAPACITY.

FOR SELECTING BUSBARS, BUSBAR SUPPORTS,

CABLE & SWITCHGEAR, DESIGNED TO WITHSTAND THERMAL & MECHANICAL STRESSES BECAUSE OF SHORT CIRCUIT.

TO DO CURRENT BASED DISCRIMINATION

(4)

TYPES OF SHORT CIRCUITS

L – E (SINGLE LINE TO EARTH)

L – L (LINE TO LINE)

L – L – E (LINE TO LINE TO EARTH)L – L – L (THREE PHASE)

(5)

SOURCES OF SHORT CIRCUIT

CURRENTS

IN-HOUSE SYNCHRONOUS

GENERATORS

SYNCHRONOUS MOTORS &

SYNCHRONOUS CONDENSERS

ASYNCHRONOUS INDUCTION MOTORSELECTRIC UTILITY SYSTEM THROUGH

(6)

NATURE OF SHORT CIRCUIT

CURRENT

THE SHORT CIRCUIT CURRENT WILL

CONSIST OF FOLLOWING

COMPONENTS :

 THE AC COMPONENT WITH CONSTANT

AMPLITUDE

 THE DECAYING DC COMPONENT

(7)

NATURE OF SHORT CIRCUIT

CURRENT

THE SHORT CIRCUIT CURRENT WILL

CONSIST OF FOLLOWING COMPONENTS :

 THE AC COMPONENT WITH DECAYING

AMPLITUDE

 THE DECAYING DC COMPONENT

SOURCE : SYNCHRONOUS GENERATORS &

MOTORS / INDUCTION MOTORS

(8)

NATURE OF SHORT CIRCUIT CURRENT

TOP ENVELOPE DECAYING DC COMPONENT CURRENT BOTTOM ENVELOPE TIME WAVEFORM

(9)

NATURE OF SHORT CIRCUIT

CURRENT

IK = INITIAL SYMMETRICAL RMS S/C CURRENT IK = STEADY STATE RMS S/C CURRENT

iP = PEAK S/C CURRENT

A = INITIAL VALUE OF DECAYING DC COMPONENT Note: FOR S/C FAR FROM GENERATOR (e.g. L.V.

SYSTEM GETTING POWER FROM UTILITY THROUGH TRANSFORMERS) : IK = IK

(10)

CALCULATION ASSUMPTIONS

SIMPLIFIES CALCULATION

ACCURACY IS NOT MUCH

AFFECTED

CALCULATED VALUES WILL BE

HIGHER THAN ACTUAL & HENCE

SAFE

(11)

CALCULATION ASSUMPTIONS

TYPE OF SHORT CIRCUIT : THREE PHASE

BOLTED SHORT CIRCUIT

IMPEDANCES OF BUSBAR/SWITCHGEAR/C.T.

/JOINTS ARE NEGLECTED

FAULT CURRENT FROM THE TRANSFORMER

WOULD BE LIMITED BY THE SOURCE FAULT LEVEL

TRANSFORMER TAP IS IN THE MAIN POSITIONSHORT CIRCUIT CURRENT WAVEFORM IS A

PURE SINE WAVE

DISCHARGE CURRENT OF CAPACITORS ARE

NEGLECTED

(12)

CALCULATION METHODS

* DIRECT METHOD * PER UNIT METHOD

(13)

ADVANTAGES OF DIRECT METHOD

# USES SYSTEM SINGLE LINE DIAGRAM

DIRECTLY

# USES SYSTEM & EQUIPMENT DATA

DIRECTLY

# USES BASIC ELECTRICAL EQUATIONS

DIRECTLY

(14)

STANDARD

T H E F A U L T L E V E L C A L C U L A T I O N P R O C E D U R E F O L L O W E D I N T H I S P R E S E N T A T I O N I S A S G I V E N I N IS 13234 – 1992 (Indian Standard Guide for Calculating Short Circuit Currents in AC Electrical Networks up to 220kV)

(15)

F

AULT

L

EVEL

C

ALCULATIONS

– D

IRECT

M

ETHOD

– A

STEP BY STEP APPROACH

Step 1: Prepare a single line diagram of the electrical power supply and

distribution network, clearly indicating all the significant network elements,

fault current contributors, short circuit protective devices, etc.

(16)

F

AULT

L

EVEL

C

ALCULATIONS

– D

IRECT

M

ETHOD

– A

STEP BY STEP APPROACH

Step 2: Get the following data:

i) Transformer rated kVA, rated secondary

voltage of the transformer (UrT), %R & %X

values.

ii) Generator rated kVA, rated voltage (UrG),

rated sub-transient reactance (%x”

d) &

(17)

F

AULT

L

EVEL

C

ALCULATIONS

– D

IRECT

M

ETHOD

– A

STEP BY STEP APPROACH

Step 2: Get the following data:

iii) Cable Resistance (RC) & Cable Reactance

(XC) per unit length and the actual length of

the cable used.

iv) Motors’ rated voltages (UrM), rated currents

(18)

F

AULT

L

EVEL

C

ALCULATIONS

– D

IRECT

M

ETHOD

– A

STEP BY STEP APPROACH

Step 3: Convert %R into Ohmic values,

to obtain RT.

10 x (%R) x (kV)2

RT (in Ω) =

(19)

F

AULT

L

EVEL

C

ALCULATIONS

– D

IRECT

M

ETHOD

– A

STEP BY STEP APPROACH

Step 4: Similarly, convert %X into

Ohmic values, to obtain XT.

10 x (%X) x (kV)2

XT (in Ω) =

(20)

F

AULT

L

EVEL

C

ALCULATIONS

– D

IRECT

M

ETHOD

– A

STEP BY STEP APPROACH

Step 5: Similarly, convert %x”

d of the

generator into Ohmic values, to obtain XG.

10 x (%x”

d ) x (kV)2

XG (in Ω) =

(21)

F

AULT

L

EVEL

C

ALCULATIONS

– D

IRECT

M

ETHOD

– A

STEP BY STEP APPROACH

Step 6: Now, the resistance of the

generator, ‘RG’ is normally given as a

% of ‘XG’. For LV Generators, it is:

(22)

F

AULT

L

EVEL

C

ALCULATIONS

– D

IRECT

M

ETHOD

– A

STEP BY STEP APPROACH

Step 7: Calculate a correction factor ‘KG’.

Un c

KG = ---

---UrG 1 + [(x”

d ) (Sin φrG)]

(23)

F

AULT

L

EVEL

C

ALCULATIONS

– D

IRECT

M

ETHOD

– A

STEP BY STEP APPROACH

KG = Generator Correction Factor

Un = Nominal System Voltage, in Volts

URG = Generator Rated Voltage, in Volts

c = Voltage Correction Factor = 1.05

x”

d = Sub-transient Reactance of the

Generator, in p.u. form

Sin φrG = √(1 – Cos2φ

rG)

(24)

F

AULT

L

EVEL

C

ALCULATIONS

– D

IRECT

M

ETHOD

– A

STEP BY STEP APPROACH

Step 8: Now find out the Corrected

Generator Resistance (RGK) & the

Corrected Generator Reactance (XGK):

RGK = KG x RG

(25)

F

AULT

L

EVEL

C

ALCULATIONS

– D

IRECT

M

ETHOD

– A

STEP BY STEP APPROACH

Step 9: Now find out the cable resistance & reactance for the actual length of cable used up to the point of fault:

RL = RC x LC

(26)

F

AULT

L

EVEL

C

ALCULATIONS

– D

IRECT

M

ETHOD

– A

STEP BY STEP APPROACH

where,

RL = Line or Lead Resistance, in Ω

XL = Line or Lead Reactance, in Ω

RC = Cable Resistance per km, in Ω

XC = Cable Reactance per km, in Ω

LC = Actual length of cable up to the

(27)

F

AULT

L

EVEL

C

ALCULATIONS

– D

IRECT

M

ETHOD

– A

STEP BY STEP APPROACH

Step 10: Now add all ‘R’ & all ‘X’ values;

find out ‘Zk’.

Zk = √[(Re)2 + (X

e)2]

Re = RT or RGK + RL

(28)

F

AULT

L

EVEL

C

ALCULATIONS

– D

IRECT

M

ETHOD

– A

STEP BY STEP APPROACH

Step 11: Now find out the initial

symmetrical short circuit current, I”

k:

c Un

I”

k =

(29)

F

AULT

L

EVEL

C

ALCULATIONS

– D

IRECT

M

ETHOD

– A

STEP BY STEP APPROACH

where, I”

k = Initial Symmetrical short circuit

current, in Amperes

Un = Nominal System Voltage, in volts

c = Voltage Correction factor = 1.05

for LV (for HV it is 1.10)

Zk = Equivalent Impedance up to the

(30)

F

AULT

L

EVEL

C

ALCULATIONS

– D

IRECT

M

ETHOD

– A

STEP BY STEP APPROACH

Step 12: Determine the ‘X’/’R’ ratio up to the point of fault.

Step 13: Calculate the Asymmetry Factor

‘’ (pronounced as ‘KHI’).

(31)

F

AULT

L

EVEL

C

ALCULATIONS

– D

IRECT

M

ETHOD

– A

STEP BY STEP APPROACH

Step 14: Now, calculate the peak current,

‘ip’ =  √2 I”

k

Step 15: Calculate the aggregate of the

rated full load currents of all the motors at

(32)

F

AULT

L

EVEL

C

ALCULATIONS

– D

IRECT

M

ETHOD

– A

STEP BY STEP APPROACH

Step 16: If (ΣIrM) at a particular location is

less than 1% of the short circuit current contributed by other sources for a fault at that particular location, then contribution to the short circuit, from the motors in that

particular group, need not be considered. Or else, the motors’ contribution to short circuit has to be calculated.

(33)

F

AULT

L

EVEL

C

ALCULATIONS

– D

IRECT

M

ETHOD

– A

STEP BY STEP APPROACH

Step 17: Assuming that the motors’ contribution

has to be considered, the R.M.S. Current

contribution to the short circuit, from the group

of motors will be:

I

kM

=

c 6 ΣI

rM

, if the S/C is at the

motor terminals

I

kM

=

c 5 ΣI

rM

, if the S/C is away from

the motor terminals, involving a

cable

(34)

F

AULT

L

EVEL

C

ALCULATIONS

– D

IRECT

M

ETHOD

– A

STEP BY STEP APPROACH

Step 18: And, the peak current contribution from the motor group would be:

ipM =M √2 I” kM

where,

M = 1.3 for an R/X ratio of 0.42, as in the

(35)

F

AULT

L

EVEL

C

ALCULATIONS

– D

IRECT

M

ETHOD

– A

STEP BY STEP APPROACH

Step 19: Now, calculate the total fault level,

both R.M.S. (I”

KT) and the Peak (ipT) at the fault

location:

I”

KT = I”K + I”KM

and

(36)

F

AULT

L

EVEL

C

ALCULATIONS

– D

IRECT

M

ETHOD

A FEW

IFS

AND

BUTS

’.

What if the transformer’s ‘%R’ & ‘%X’ values are not known?

Need not worry! However, one can get to know the transformer’s ‘%Z’ from the name

plate. Now, convert this ‘%Z’, into ZT in Ω,

using the same formula:

(37)

F

AULT

L

EVEL

C

ALCULATIONS

– D

IRECT

M

ETHOD

A FEW

IFS

AND

BUTS

’.

The resistance of the transformer in Ω (RT),

can be got from one of the following ways:

i) From the manufacturer’s test certificate

ii) By actual measurements, using either a low

resistance measuring meter or a Kelvin’s Double Bridge

(38)

F

AULT

L

EVEL

C

ALCULATIONS

– D

IRECT

M

ETHOD

A FEW

IFS

AND

BUTS

’.

iii) Or from the formula:

RT = [(PkrT)/(3I2

rT)], where,

PkrT = Transformer Full Load Copper Loss,

in Watts

IrT = Rated full load secondary current

(39)

F

AULT

L

EVEL

C

ALCULATIONS

– D

IRECT

M

ETHOD

A FEW

IFS

AND

BUTS

’.

Once you know ZT & RT, XT can be easily

calculated by:

XT = √[(ZT)2 – (R

(40)

F

AULT

L

EVEL

C

ALCULATIONS

– D

IRECT

M

ETHOD

A FEW

IFS

AND

BUTS

’.

What if I don’t have any of the above data

regarding R

T

?

Transformer manufacturers give guidance

values

of the

no-load loss, the full load loss & %

impedance for a wide range of transformers in

their catalogues. They can be taken as a guide

for the calculations.

(41)

F

AULT

L

EVEL

C

ALCULATIONS

– D

IRECT

M

ETHOD

A FEW

IFS

AND

BUTS

’.

For example, the following data is got from a

leading transformer manufacturer

kVA

NLL (W)

FLL (W)

%Z

160

450

3000

4.75

200

540

3200

4.75

250

630

3800

4.75

315

725

4400

5

400

850

5500

5

500

1040

6500

5

(42)

F

AULT

L

EVEL

C

ALCULATIONS

– D

IRECT

M

ETHOD

A FEW

IFS

AND

BUTS

’.

kVA

NLL (W)

FLL (W)

%Z

630

1200

8000

5

800

1450

9500

5

1000

1800

11500

5

1250

1900

13500

6.25

1600

2300

17000

6.25

(43)

FAULT LEVEL CALCULATIONS

- A CASE STUDY

(44)

STEP 1 : SINGLE LINE DIAGRAM

 )  )  )  ) )  ) F1 F3 PCC MCC BUSBAR U/G CABLE M2 M1 M3 M4 11 21 22 23 24 31 50HP 100HP 30HP 150HP  ) CB SDF STARTER      G  )  ) F2 12 13 STANDBY GENERATOR 1250kVA TRANSFORMER 1600kVA 350 A 300 A 300 A

(45)

STEP 2 : SYSTEM DATA

TRANSFORMER

: 11/0.433kV 1600kVA %R = 0.94 %X = 5.46 %Z = 5.54

STANDBY GENERATOR

: UrG = 415V 1250kVA %x d = 20 Cos rG = 0.8 Un = 415V

(46)

STEP 2 : SYSTEM DATA

CABLE :

R = 0.062 /kM

X = 0.079 /kM

LENGTH OF CABLE, 21 TO 31= 100M

INDUCTION MOTORS :

M1, IrM = 70A

M2, IrM = 135A M3, IrM = 40A M4, IrM = 200A (UrM = 415V; ILR = 6 IrM)

References

Related documents

H1 There is a difference in the impact of country-of-origin cues on consumer attitudes, purchasing intention, and country image between a local (Malaysian) and foreign (China

Clearwater Seafoods is based in Bedford, Nova Scotia, Canada and is recognized globally for its superior quality, food safety, diversity of species and reliable worldwide

Table 2 shows the median levels of serum ferritin in the three groups with normal lung function, a restrictive spirometric pattern, and airway obstruction, according to age

Other zones PLWS, PLS, and PLM landforms need construction of water harvesting structures like recharge pits and check dams for augmenting the water resource.

straight toward a creature and then hits it with a gore attack on the same turn, that target must succeed on a DC 12 Strength saving throw or be knocked prone.. If the target is

1) Create working definitions of diaspora communities in order to conduct comprehensive research on diaspora philanthropy to the continent. Both the literature review and

Encore que je sois en parfait accord avec sa vision et sa compréhension du rôle de la recherche, il semble essentiel de se demander si tous les membres de notre profession

Many of the above questions, under the “prioritization” and “integrated policy” challenges, imply a response in terms of “smart policy-making”. This can be